Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Susceptibility

In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibilities of Trichosporon Species

Niki I. Paphitou, Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner, Victor L. Paetznick, Jose R. Rodriguez, Enuo Chen, John H. Rex
Niki I. Paphitou
Laboratory for Mycology Research, Center for the Study of Emerging and Re-Emerging Pathogens, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Texas—Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas 77030
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Elpida-Niki.I.Paphitou@uth.tmc.edu
Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner
Laboratory for Mycology Research, Center for the Study of Emerging and Re-Emerging Pathogens, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Texas—Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas 77030
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victor L. Paetznick
Laboratory for Mycology Research, Center for the Study of Emerging and Re-Emerging Pathogens, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Texas—Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas 77030
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jose R. Rodriguez
Laboratory for Mycology Research, Center for the Study of Emerging and Re-Emerging Pathogens, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Texas—Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas 77030
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Enuo Chen
Laboratory for Mycology Research, Center for the Study of Emerging and Re-Emerging Pathogens, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Texas—Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas 77030
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John H. Rex
Laboratory for Mycology Research, Center for the Study of Emerging and Re-Emerging Pathogens, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Texas—Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas 77030
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.4.1144-1146.2002
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The in vitro activities of amphotericin B, itraconazole, fluconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and ravuconazole against 39 isolates of Trichosporon spp. were determined by the NCCLS M27-A microdilution method. The azoles tested appeared to be more potent than amphotericin B. Low minimal fungicidal concentration/MIC ratios were observed for voriconazole, posaconazole, and ravuconazole, suggesting fungicidal activity.

Trichosporon spp. are well recognized as pathogens capable of causing invasive disease (1, 2, 8). Trichosporonosis, the deep-seated infection caused by this fungus, is an often fatal disease affecting mostly immunocompromised hosts (1, 3, 4, 8, 10, 12). Mortality is as high as 80% (8, 9, 12, 19), and it has been reported as the most common cause of noncandidal yeast infection in patients with hematological malignancies (9). Since the taxonomic revision of the genus Trichosporon in 1992 (6), it has been recognized that the formerly used designation Trichosporon beigelii includes several genetically distinct species. T. asahii is the species most often implicated in deep-seated infections in humans.

Despite the increased frequency and severity of trichosporonosis, data on the antifungal susceptibilities of Trichosporon spp . are limited (5, 7, 11, 15-18) and recommendations for in vitro testing of this fungus are not included in the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) guidelines. Treatment of this infection with the currently available antifungal agents has generally been unrewarding, and clinical failures of amphotericin B (AMB), fluconazole (FLU), and a combination of the two have been reported (1, 3, 8, 12, 13, 20). Investigational triazoles such as voriconazole (VOR), posaconazole (POS), and ravuconazole (RAV) are attractive candidates for the treatment of this infection. With this study, we sought to determine the in vitro activities of various antifungals against Trichosporon spp ., as well as to gain experience with the NCCLS M27-A method application for this organism, utilizing the largest number of isolates tested so far in one setting.

A total of 39 Trichosporon sp. clinical isolates were evaluated. These consisted of 24 strains of T. asahii, 10 of T. mucoides, and 5 of T. inkin, which were identified twice by API 20C AUX system (BioMérieux Vitek Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.) testing. The isolates were maintained in water stocks and subcultured twice on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) plates with incubation at 35°C for 24 to 48 h. Four quality control Candida strains (Candida krusei ATCC 6258, C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019, C. lusitaniae 5W31, and C.lusitaniae CL524) were also included in the experiments. VOR and FLU (Pfizer Central Research, Sandwich, United Kingdom), RAV and AMB (Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Princeton, N.J.), ITRA (Janssen Pharmaceutica, Beerse, Belgium), and POS (Schering-Plough Research Institute, Bloomfield, N.J.) were obtained from the manufacturers as defined powders. The NCCLS M27-A microdilution broth-based method (14) was used to determine MICs. Drug stocks and dilutions were prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.), except for FLU, which was prepared in sterile distilled water. Final drug concentrations in the microdilution plates ranged from 64 to 0.125 μg/ml for FLU and from 16 to 0.031 μg/ml for all of the other drugs. The microdilution plates were prepared by using the synthetic medium RPMI 1640 (Sigma Chemical Co.) buffered to pH 7.0 with 0.165 M morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS; Sigma Chemical Co.). In addition, AMB was also tested in Antibiotic Medium 3 buffered to pH 7.0 by addition of 0.01 M phosphate (AM3; Becton Dickinson and Co., Cockeysville, Md.). Yeast suspensions were spectrophotometrically prepared after vortexing and adjustment to a 0.5 McFarland standard transmittance at a wavelength of 530 nm. After serial dilution of the above-described suspensions, the final inoculum yielded was 0.5 × 103 to 2.5 × 103 cells/ml, which was confirmed by performing colony counts on SDA plates. MICs were visually determined at 24 and 48 h of incubation at 35°C. As accurate spectrophotometric MIC determinations were not possible due to the speckled growth pattern that the organisms exhibited in the microdilution plates, the visually determined MIC was defined as the lowest drug concentration at which there was complete absence of growth (MIC-0) or a prominent growth reduction (MIC-2) in comparison with that of controls. Minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) determinations were done for VOR, POS, and RAV by plating 20 μl of each clear well on SDA plates after 48 h of incubation at 35°C. The MFC was the lowest drug concentration giving no growth on the SDA plates (≥98% killing). Experiments were repeated in duplicate, and when discordant MICs were found, the higher one was reported. As a means by which to estimate concordance between MICs and MFCs, MIC/MFC ratios were calculated for each strain and the range and median of these ratios are reported (Table 1).

AMB, FLU, and ITRA MICs against the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) quality control Candida strains were within the acceptable limits determined by the NCCLS. Fungal growth was readily visible by 24 h of incubation and somewhat increased by 48 h. Results are shown in Table 1. The MIC-0 was the endpoint used for AMB MIC determination, whereas both the MIC-0 and the MIC-2 are reported for the azoles. MICs at 24 and 48 h were within 1 or 2 dilutions of each other. AMB MICs were relatively high for both T. asahii and non-T. asahii isolates and were eightfold higher when AM 3 was the medium used for AMB testing. High AMB MFC/MIC ratios were previously reported by Walsh et al. and correlated with poor clinical outcomes in neutropenic patients (20). Other investigators have also reported relatively high AMB MICs for limited numbers of isolates tested (7, 16-18). Our results confirm these previous observations, suggesting that AMB treatment alone for trichosporonosis is unlikely to be rewarding, especially when host defenses are lacking.

FLU MICs were relatively low, confirming previous findings of in vitro activity of FLU against Trichosporon sp . isolates (7, 15, 16, 18). Unfortunately the in vitro observation of FLU activity has not correlated well with good clinical outcomes. ITRA MICs were similarly relatively low. Our results confirm the previous observation of Perparim et al. (16), as well as of other authors (7, 11, 15, 17, 18), that the azoles, in general, appear to be more active in vitro against this pathogen compared to AMB. However, high MFCs of both FLU (MFC50 [MFC for 50% of the strains tested], >80 μg/ml) and ITRA (MFC50, >10 μg/ml) have been previously reported (20). Animal data have also shown superiority of FLU, compared to AMB, in prolonging survival time and reducing the fungal burden in the kidneys of neutropenic mice (21).

RAV, POS, and VOR appeared to be more active than AMB and FLU and similar to ITRA. The MIC-0 and MIC-2 of the investigational triazoles were often similar, but some isolates did show significant trailing. The MIC-0 and MFC correlated closely for some isolates, suggesting fungicidal activity, but the MICs and MFCs for other isolates were high. Based on the MIC-0 and MFC, the non-T. asahii isolates appeared more resistant to the investigational triazoles than did the T. asahii isolates but more susceptible to AMB. VOR and POS appeared to be slightly more potent in vitro than RAV. Although there are no established breakpoints to define antifungal susceptibility for Trichosporon spp., our study suggests a superiority of the azoles to AMB and a potential fungicidal effect of POS, VOR, and RAV. Further studies for in vivo correlation of these findings seem worthwhile.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

MICs and MFCs of various antifungal agents against 39 clinical Trichosporon sp. isolatesa

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by a grant from Pfizer, Inc.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 10 October 2001.
    • Returned for modification 12 December 2001.
    • Accepted 15 January 2002.
  • Copyright © 2002 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Anaissie, E., and G. P. Bodey. 1991. Disseminated trichosporonosis: meeting the challenge. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis10:711-713.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Anaissie, E. J., G. P. Bodey, and M. G. Rinaldi. 1989. Emerging fungal pathogens. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis8:323-330.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Cawley, M. J., G. R. Braxton, L. R. Haith, K. J. Reilly, R. E. Guilday, and M. L. Patton. 2000. Trichosporon beigelii infection: experience in a regional burn center. Burns26:483-486.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Ebright, J. R., M. R. Fairfax, and J. A. Vazquez. 2001. Trichosporon asahii, a non-candida yeast that caused fatal septic shock in a patient without cancer or neutropenia. Clin. Infect. Dis.33:E28-E30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Espinel-Ingroff, A. 1998. Comparison of In vitro activities of the new triazole SCH56592 and the echinocandins MK-0991 (L-743,872) and LY303366 against opportunistic filamentous and dimorphic fungi and yeasts. J. Clin. Microbiol.36:2950-2956.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Gueho, E., G. S. de Hoog, and M. T. Smith. 1992. Neotypification of the genus Trichosporon.Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek61:285-288.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Hata, K., J. Kimura, H. Miki, T. Toyosawa, T. Nakamura, and K. Katsu. 1996. In vitro and in vivo antifungal activities of ER-30346, a novel oral triazole with a broad antifungal spectrum. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.40:2237-2242.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Hoy, J., K. C. Hsu, K. Rolston, R. L. Hopfer, M. Luna, and G. P. Bodey. 1986. Trichosporon beigelii infection: a review. Rev. Infect. Dis.8:959-967.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Krcmery, V., I. Krupova, and D. W. Denning. 1999. Invasive yeast infections other than Candida spp. in acute leukaemia. J. Hosp. Infect.41:181-194.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Lo Passo, C., I. Pernice, A. Celeste, G. Perdichizzi, and F. Todaro-Luck. 2001. Transmission of Trichosporon asahii oesophagitis by a contaminated endoscope. Mycoses44:13-21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    McGinnis, M. R., L. Pasarell, D. A. Sutton, A. W. Fothergill, C. R. Cooper, Jr., and M. G. Rinaldi. 1998. In vitro activity of voriconazole against selected fungi. Med. Mycol.36:239-242.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Mooty, M. Y., S. S. Kanj, M. Y. Obeid, G. Y. Hassan, and G. F. Araj. 2001. A case of Trichosporon beigelii endocarditis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.20:139-142.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Moretti-Branchini, M. L., K. Fukushima, A. Z. Schreiber, K. Nishimura, P. M. Papaiordanou, P. Trabasso, R. Tanaka, and M. Miyaji. 2001. Trichosporon species infection in bone marrow transplanted patients. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.39:161-164.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved standard NCCLS document M27-A. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  15. 15.↵
    Nenoff, P., U. Oswald, and U. F. Haustein. 1999. In vitro susceptibility of yeasts for fluconazole and itraconazole. Evaluation of a microdilution test. Mycoses42:629-639.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Perparim, K., H. Nagai, A. Hashimoto, Y. Goto, T. Tashiro, and M. Nasu. 1996. In vitro susceptibility of Trichosporon beigelii to antifungal agents. J. Chemother.8:445-448.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    Uchida, K., Y. Nishiyama, N. Yokota, and H. Yamaguchi. 2000. In vitro antifungal activity of a novel lipopeptide antifungal agent, FK463, against various fungal pathogens. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo)53:1175-1181.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    Uzun, O., S. Arikan, S. Kocagoz, B. Sancak, and S. Unal. 2000. Susceptibility testing of voriconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole and amphotericin B against yeast isolates in a Turkish University Hospital and effect of time of reading. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.38:101-107.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    Walsh, T. J. 1989. Trichosporonosis. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am.3:43-52.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Walsh, T. J., G. P. Melcher, M. G. Rinaldi, J. Lecciones, D. A. McGough, P. Kelly, J. Lee, D. Callender, M. Rubin, and P. A. Pizzo. 1990. Trichosporon beigelii, an emerging pathogen resistant to amphotericin B. J. Clin. Microbiol.28:1616-1622.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    Yamamoto, K., K. Makimura, T. Sudo, K. Shibuya, K. Uchida, and H. Yamaguchi. 1997. Experimental disseminated trichosporonosis in mice: tissue distribution and therapy with antifungal agents. J. Med. Vet. Mycol.35:411-418.
    OpenUrlPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibilities of Trichosporon Species
Niki I. Paphitou, Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner, Victor L. Paetznick, Jose R. Rodriguez, Enuo Chen, John H. Rex
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Apr 2002, 46 (4) 1144-1146; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.4.1144-1146.2002

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibilities of Trichosporon Species
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibilities of Trichosporon Species
Niki I. Paphitou, Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner, Victor L. Paetznick, Jose R. Rodriguez, Enuo Chen, John H. Rex
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Apr 2002, 46 (4) 1144-1146; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.4.1144-1146.2002
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

antifungal agents
Trichosporon

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596