Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Susceptibility

Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance among Urinary Tract Infection Isolates of Escherichia coli from Female Outpatients in the United States

James A. Karlowsky, Laurie J. Kelly, Clyde Thornsberry, Mark E. Jones, Daniel F. Sahm
James A. Karlowsky
1Focus Technologies, Inc., Herndon, Virginia 20171
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jkarlowsky@focusanswers.com
Laurie J. Kelly
1Focus Technologies, Inc., Herndon, Virginia 20171
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clyde Thornsberry
2Focus Technologies, Inc.Franklin, Tennessee, 37064
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark E. Jones
3Focus Technologies, Inc., 1217 KP Hilversum, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel F. Sahm
1Focus Technologies, Inc., Herndon, Virginia 20171
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.8.2540-2545.2002
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The Infectious Diseases Society of America advocates trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) as initial therapy for females with acute uncomplicated bacterial cystitis in settings where the prevalence of SXT resistance does not exceed 10 to 20%. To determine trends in the activities of SXT, ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, and nitrofurantoin among urine isolates of Escherichia coli from female outpatients, susceptibility testing data from The Surveillance Network (TSN) Database-USA (n = 286,187) from 1995 to 2001 were analyzed. Resistance rates among E. coli isolates to ampicillin (range, 36.0 to 37.4% per year), SXT (range, 14.8 to 17.0%), ciprofloxacin (range, 0.7 to 2.5%), and nitrofurantoin (range, 0.4 to 0.8%) varied only slightly over this 7-year period. Ciprofloxacin was the only agent studied that demonstrated a consistent stepwise increase in resistance from 1995 (0.7%) to 2001 (2.5%). In 2001, SXT resistance among E. coli isolates was >10% in all nine U.S. Bureau of the Census regions. At institutions testing ≥100 urinary isolates of E. coli (n = 126) in 2001, ampicillin (range, 27.3 to 98.8%) and SXT (range, 7.5 to 47.1%) resistance rates varied widely while ciprofloxacin (range, 0 to 12.9%) and nitrofurantoin (range, 0 to 2.8%) resistance rates were more consistent. In 2001, the most frequent coresistant phenotypes were resistance to ampicillin and SXT (12.0% of all isolates; 82.3% of coresistant isolates) and resistance to ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, and SXT (1.4% of all isolates; 9.9% of coresistant isolates). Coresistance less frequently included resistance to nitrofurantoin (3.5% of coresistant isolates) than resistance to ciprofloxacin (15.8%), SXT (95.7%), and ampicillin (98.1%). In conclusion, among urinary isolates of E. coli from female outpatients in the United States, national resistance rates to SXT were relatively consistent (14.8 to 17.0%) from 1995 to 2001 but demonstrated considerable regional and institutional variation in 2001. Therapies other than SXT may need to be considered in some locations.

There are an estimated 150 million urinary tract infections per annum worldwide (26). In the United States, urinary tract infections result in approximately 8 million physician visits per year (30). Urinary tract infections are the most common bacterial infections in women and account for significant morbidity and health care costs (4, 26). A limited and predictable spectrum of organisms cause urinary tract infections in young, otherwise healthy females. Among both outpatients and inpatients, Escherichia coli is the primary urinary tract pathogen, accounting for 75 to 90% of uncomplicated urinary tract infection isolates (4, 21). Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Klebsiella spp., Proteus spp., Enterococcus spp., and Enterobacter spp. are pathogens less commonly isolated from outpatients.

The currently recommended empirical antimicrobial regimen for treating acute uncomplicated bacterial cystitis in otherwise healthy adult nonpregnant females is a 3-day course of double-strength trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) in settings where the prevalence of SXT resistance is <10 to 20% (1, 30). Investigators studying the economic impact of SXT and ciprofloxacin therapies have presented data supporting the empirical use of SXT when the local rate of resistance to SXT does not exceed 22% (14). Alternative therapy for uncomplicated urinary tract infections in settings with >10 to 20% SXT resistance may include a fluoroquinolone, nitrofurantoin, or fosfomycin (30).

The Infectious Diseases Society of America also recommends that physicians obtain information on local resistance rates and that ongoing surveillance be conducted to monitor changes in susceptibility of uropathogens (30). Surveillance at the institutional and regional level is particularly important given that previous studies have reported that the activity of SXT against urinary isolates of E. coli can vary considerably by geographic region (6, 25). The prevalence of SXT resistance among urinary pathogens appears considerable in the United States, and it seems inevitable that SXT will eventually need to be replaced by alternative therapies, at least in some areas (5-7, 11, 26).

In vitro studies specifically describing the antimicrobial susceptibilities of urinary isolates of E. coli from female outpatients are limited (5-7, 9, 12, 18). In these studies, SXT resistance increased from 7 to 9% in 1989 to 1992 (5, 7, 18, 28) to 17 to 18% in 1995 to 1999 (5-7, 12). Fluoroquinolone resistance was ≤1% in each of the aforementioned studies, and nitrofurantoin resistance was reported to be ≤2% on national and regional levels in the United States. The 1998 SENTRY surveillance program, reporting on isolates of E. coli collected from 26 U.S. centers, found the overall prevalence of SXT resistance to be 23.3% (17), very similar to the resistance rate found a year earlier (25.2%) by the same surveillance program (11).

The present study was conducted to determine national, regional, and institutional in vitro susceptibilities for ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and SXT among urine isolates of E. coli from female outpatients from across the United States in 2001. In addition, the rate of change in susceptibilities to these four commonly tested antimicrobial agents over 7 years, from 1995 to 2001, was also determined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing results.The Surveillance Network (TSN) Database-USA (Focus Technologies, Herndon, Va.) was used as the source of antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for this study. TSN Database-USA is a real-time database that can be queried and that electronically assimilates antimicrobial susceptibility testing and patient demographic data from a network of hospitals in the United States (24). The number of laboratories participating in TSN Database-USA increased from 43 in 1995 to 58 in 1996, 122 in 1997, 186 in 1998, 232 in 1999, 258 in 2000, and 270 in 2001. Laboratories are included in TSN based on factors such as hospital bed size, patient population, geographic location, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods used (24). Susceptibility testing of patient isolates is conducted on site by each participating laboratory as a part of their routine diagnostic testing. Only data generated using Food and Drug Administration-approved testing methods with MIC results interpreted according to NCCLS recommendations (20) are included in TSN. In addition, a series of quality control filters (i.e., critical rule sets) are used to screen susceptibility test results for patterns indicative of testing error; suspect results are removed from analysis for laboratory confirmation.

The antimicrobial susceptibility testing results included in the analysis were restricted to the first urine isolate of E. coli submitted per calendar year by female outpatients of all ages. Data from patients in nursing facilities were not included. Urine specimen sources other than clean catch (e.g., catheterized urine or catheter tip cultures) were excluded from the analysis. Ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and SXT susceptibility data were analyzed nationally from 1995 to 2001 and in 2001 for the nine U.S. Bureau of the Census regions and for institutions (n = 126) testing ≥100 isolates of E. coli from unique female outpatients. All isolates were tested against all four antimicrobial agents. Additional analyses were performed to determine levels of coresistance and coresistant phenotypes for isolates tested in 2001.

RESULTS

Ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and SXT susceptibilities for urine isolates of E. coli from female outpatients during the years 1995 through 2001 are presented in Table 1. Ampicillin susceptibility (yearly range, 61.8 to 63.2%), SXT susceptibility (yearly range, 83.1 to 85.2%), ciprofloxacin susceptibility (yearly range, 97.4 to 99.3%), and nitrofurantoin susceptibility (yearly range, 98.3 to 99.1%) were generally unchanged or decreased marginally over the 7 years studied. Ciprofloxacin was the only agent studied that demonstrated a consistent stepwise increase in resistance from 1995 (0.7%) to 2001 (2.5%). Resistance rates to ampicillin (range, 36.0 to 37.4% per year), SXT (range, 14.8 to 17.0%), and nitrofurantoin (range, 0.4 to 0.8%) varied only slightly over this 7-year period.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Antimicrobial susceptibilities of E. coli urinary isolates from female outpatients in the United States from 1995 to 2001

In 2001, significant regional variations in resistance rates for ampicillin (range, 29.4 [New England region] to 43.5% [West South Central region]), SXT (range, 11.8 [East North Central region] to 21.8% [West South Central region]), and ciprofloxacin (range, 1.3 [West North Central region] to 6.0% [South Atlantic region]) were observed (Fig. 1). Nitrofurantoin resistance rates were the most regionally consistent, with a narrow range from 0.4% (New England region) to 0.9% (South Atlantic region).

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Antimicrobial resistances (percent) among urinary isolates of E. coli in the nine U.S. Bureau of the Census regions in 2001.

All 126 institutions in 2001 that tested ≥100 urinary isolates of E. coli had nitrofurantoin resistance rates of 0 to 5% (Fig. 2). The majority (>90%) of institutions also reported resistance rates of 0 to 5% for ciprofloxacin. Resistance to nitrofurantoin ranged from 0 to 2.8% and from 0 to 12.9% for ciprofloxacin. Resistance rates for ampicillin and SXT, however, varied widely across the institutions studied. Institutions most commonly (35%) had ampicillin resistance rates of between 36 and 40%, with an overall range of 27.3 to 98.8% resistant. Approximately 46% of the 126 institutions reported SXT resistance rates between 11 and 15%, with a range of 7.5 to 47.1% resistant.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Antimicrobial resistances at 126 institutions in the United States testing 100 or more urinary isolates of E. coli against four antimicrobials in 2001.

Among the 58,065 isolates that were studied from 2001, the majority (n = 34,846; 60.0%) were susceptible to all four agents. Resistance to a single agent (n = 14,793; 25.5% of all isolates) was predominantly attributable to ampicillin (n = 13,219; 89.4%), followed by resistance to only SXT (n = 1,300; 8.8%), ciprofloxacin (n = 151; 1.0%), or nitrofurantoin (n = 123; 0.8%) (data not shown).

The coresistance analyses are summarized in Table 2. Concurrent resistance to ampicillin and SXT was the most prevalent coresistance phenotype (12.0% of all isolates; 82.3% of all coresistant isolates), followed by resistance to ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, and SXT (1.4% of all isolates; 9.9% of coresistant isolates). Ciprofloxacin (2.5%) and nitrofurantoin (0.7%) resistances, although rare overall in 2001, were for each agent more commonly found in isolates resistant to at least one other class of antimicrobial agent than among isolates susceptible to the other three agents studied. There were 8,426 isolates of E. coli (14.5% of all isolates) with a coresistant phenotype: 82 isolates (0.1% of all isolates) were resistant to all four agents.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Coresistant phenotypes (n = 8,426) among 58,065 E. coli urinary isolates tested against ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and SXT in 2001

DISCUSSION

Recent regional and national studies in the United States have reported resistance to SXT among urinary isolates of E. coli to be approaching or to exceed 20% (4-7, 11-13, 17, 23, 25). Given that E. coli is the principal pathogen in urinary tract infections, particularly among outpatients, resistance to SXT in E. coli is an important indicator of whether SXT should continue to be used empirically. The present study of 286,187 urine isolates of E. coli from female outpatients across the United States confirms that resistance to SXT is approaching 20% nationally but also that this rate (14.8 to 17.0%) changed only marginally in the 7 years studied, from 1995 to 2001 (Table 1). Previous studies documented significant increases in SXT resistance over the decade preceding 1995, from rates of <10% to the present levels of approximately 16 to 20% (4, 5, 7, 9, 12, 13, 23, 25, 28).

In 2001, all regions of the United States had SXT resistance rates that exceeded 10%. In five of the nine regions, resistance was >15%, and in two regions, resistance exceeded 20%. Resistance to SXT exceeded 10% in >90% of institutions and was >20% in approximately 45% of institutions (Fig. 2). A recent report suggesting that the dissemination of a single clonal group may have accounted for nearly half of the SXT-resistant isolates of E. coli from community-acquired infections in women in three geographically diverse communities (California, Michigan, and Minnesota) implies that rapid changes in susceptibility rates may be possible (15). The report of Manges et al. (15) is interesting given that urinary tract infections are generally considered to be the result of infection by endogenous fecal flora (11).

Approximately 14% of all isolates in 2001 were coresistant to at least ampicillin and SXT (Table 2). Two previous studies have also reported coresistance in urinary isolates of E. coli (25, 31). Zhanel et al. demonstrated a correlation between ampicillin and SXT resistances in E. coli, as well as reporting maximal rates of ampicillin (90%) and SXT (100%) resistance for ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli (31). Specifically, the study (31) found that 80% of SXT-resistant E. coli isolates were concurrently ampicillin resistant, while nitrofurantoin resistance appeared unrelated to ampicillin, SXT, or ciprofloxacin resistance, an observation confirmed by the present study. Sahm et al. reported that in the United States in 2000, 7.1% of urinary isolates of E. coli were multidrug resistant (MDR) (resistant to three or more of the following drugs: ampicillin, cephalothin, ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and SXT) and that among the MDR isolates, 97.8% were resistant to ampicillin, 92.8% were resistant to SXT, 86.6% were resistant to cephalothin, 38.8% were resistant to ciprofloxacin, and 7.7% were resistant to nitrofurantoin (25).

Most antimicrobials used to treat urinary tract infections, including SXT, can achieve high urinary concentrations. Nevertheless, preliminary data suggest that clinical cure rates may be lower among outpatient women with uncomplicated urinary tract infections (cystitis and pyelonephritis) treated with SXT when the infecting pathogen is resistant to SXT (4, 16, 19, 22, 27). For example, in a study of women with acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis, Talan et al. reported that ≤50% of patients infected with SXT-resistant isolates were clinically or microbiologically cured (4 to 11 days posttherapy) when treated with SXT compared with a >90% clinical and microbiological cure rate in women who received SXT for SXT-susceptible isolates (27). Similarly, Raz et al. demonstrated that 5 to 9 days following cessation of SXT therapy, microbiological cure rates for women with uncomplicated urinary tract infections were twice as high among patients infected with SXT-susceptible pathogens (86%) than among patients infected with SXT-resistant strains (42%) (22). Clinical cure rates 5 to 9 days following SXT therapy were similar to microbiological cure rates for patients infected with SXT-susceptible (88%) and SXT-resistant (54%) isolates in the study conducted by Raz et al. (22).

It has been suggested that fluoroquinolones are a logical choice for empirical therapy of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (29). The data presented in this study appear to validate this supposition; however, the widespread use of fluoroquinolones for such a common infection raises concerns regarding the possibility of accelerated development of resistance (30). Also, the present study noted ciprofloxacin to be the only agent that demonstrated a stepwise, >3-fold increase in resistance from 1995 (0.7%) to 2001 (2.5%) (Table 1). Given that fluoroquinolone resistance among gram-negative bacteria is found predominantly among MDR isolates suggests that fluoroquinolone resistance will be maintained and perhaps accelerate even if other antimicrobials are used (2). While fluoroquinolones have maintained an excellent level of activity against commonly occurring uropathogens, the ability of these organisms to acquire fluoroquinolone resistance, its linkage with SXT and β-lactam resistances (25), and the presence of MDR isolates in every clinically important gram-negative species are important considerations. A gradual decrease in the susceptibility of E. coli to fluoroquinolones (approximately 1% per annum) has also been reported by the U.S. arm of the SENTRY surveillance program, with no change in susceptibility to nitrofurantoin (11, 17). Increasing fluoroquinolone resistance among urinary E. coli has also been documented in studies conducted outside the United States (3).

The rate of resistance to nitrofurantoin (0.4 to 0.8%) remained low across the United States from 1995 to 2001, with rates similar to those published in earlier studies (5, 7). Nitrofurantoin is bactericidal in urine at therapeutic doses, and its multiple mechanisms of action appear to have enabled it to retain potent activity against E. coli despite nearly 50 years of use (19). The consistent and high-level susceptibility of E. coli to nitrofurantoin may be influenced by nitrofurantoin's narrow spectrum of activity, limited indication (treatment of acute cystitis), narrow tissue distribution (low or undetectable serum concentrations), and limited contact with bacteria outside the urinary tract (8).

The results of our laboratory-based investigation must be interpreted in light of the following considerations. The management of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections has changed dramatically in the past few years. Attempts to manage reimbursable medical costs have led to a decrease in physician orders for routine urine cultures and subsequent susceptibility testing for patients with acute cystitis. Because the treatment of acute cystitis in otherwise healthy adult females is now largely empirical, isolates that are tested in laboratory-based studies may be predominantly from patients for whom previous antimicrobial treatment failed or from patients with other underlying risk factors. Therefore, traditional surveillance data, such as those studied here and elsewhere, may bias towards an overreporting of resistance in patients with acute uncomplicated cystitis (26). Performing patient-based studies would be an optimal alternative but would be costly and likely not practical for regional and national data assimilation.

The consistently high prevalence of resistance to SXT (14.8 to 17.0% per annum) from 1995 to 2001 and an increasing pattern of resistance to ciprofloxacin require ongoing surveillance to identify further changes among urinary tract isolates of E. coli. Resistance to ciprofloxacin (2.5% in 2001), although still relatively low, appears to be increasing in a stepwise manner and was higher than reported in previous U.S. surveillance studies (5, 7, 11). An increase in fluoroquinolone prescribing practices for uncomplicated urinary tract infections in recent years may be contributing to this observation, according to a report by Huang et al. (10). The in vitro activities of ciprofloxacin and nitrofurantoin found in the present study suggest that they would provide adequate alternative therapy in locations where SXT use is no longer prudent because of elevated (>10 to 20%) rates of resistance.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the institutions participating in TSN Database-USA, each of which permits surveillance data collection. We are grateful to David Diakun of Focus Technologies for his technical assistance.

Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals financially supported the study.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 7 March 2002.
    • Returned for modification 3 April 2002.
    • Accepted 1 May 2002.
  • Copyright © 2002 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Echols, R. M., R. L. Tosiello, D. C. Haverstock, and A. D. Tice. 1999. Demographic, clinical, and treatment parameters influencing the outcome of acute cystitis. Clin. Infect. Dis.29:113-119.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    Friedrich, L. V., R. L. White, and J. A. Bosso. 1999. Impact of use of multiple antimicrobials on changes in susceptibility of gram-negative aerobes. Clin. Infect. Dis.28:1017-1024.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Goettsch, W., W. van Pelt, N. Nagelkerke, M. G. R. Hendrix, A. G. M. Buiting, P. L. Petit, L. J. M. Sabbe, A. J. A. van Griethuysen, and A. J. de Neeling. 2000. Increasing resistance to fluoroquinolones in Escherichia coli from urinary tract infections in The Netherlands. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.46:223-228.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Gupta, K., T. M. Hooten, and W. E. Stamm. 2001. Increasing antimicrobial resistance and the management of uncomplicated community-acquired urinary tract infections. Ann. Intern. Med.135:41-50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Gupta, K., T. M. Hooten, C. L. Wobbe, and W. E. Stamm. 1999. The prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens causing acute uncomplicated cystitis in young women. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents11:305-308.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Gupta, K., D. F. Sahm, D. Mayfield, and W. E. Stamm. 2001. Antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens that cause community-acquired urinary tract infections in women: a nationwide analysis. Clin. Infect. Dis.33:89-94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Gupta, K., D. Scholes, and W. E. Stamm. 1999. Increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens causing acute uncomplicated cystitis in women. JAMA281:736-738.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Hooper, D. C. 2000. Urinary tract agents: nitrofurantoin and methenamine, p. 423-428. In G. L. Mandell, J. E. Bennett, and R. Dolin (ed.), Principles and practice of infectious diseases, 5th ed., vol. 1. Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, Pa.
  9. 9.↵
    Hooton, T. M., and W. E. Stamm. 1997. Diagnosis and treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am.11:551-581.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Huang, E. S., et al. 2002. Many United States physicians do not follow established urinary tract infection antibiotic guidelines. Arch. Int. Med.162:41-47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Jones, R. N., K. C. Kugler, M. A. Pfaller, and P. L. Winokur. 1999. Characteristics of pathogens causing urinary tract infections in hospitals in North America: results from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program, 1997. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.35:55-63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Karlowsky, J. A., M. E. Jones, C. Thornsberry, I. Critchley, L. J. Kelly, and D. F. Sahm. 2001. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among urinary tract pathogens isolated from female outpatients across the US in 1999. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents18:121-127.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Karlowsky, J. A., L. J. Kelly, C. Thornsberry, M. E. Jones, A. T. Evangelista, I. A. Critchley, and D. F. Sahm. 2002. Susceptibility to fluoroquinolones among commonly isolated Gram-negative bacilli in 2000: TRUST and TSN data for the United States. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents19(Suppl. 1):21-31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Le, T. P., and L. G. Miller. 2001. Empirical therapy for uncomplicated urinary tract infections in an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance: a decision and cost analysis. Clin. Infect. Dis.33:615-621.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Manges, A. R., J. R. Johnson, B. Foxman, T. T. O'Bryan, K. E. Fullerton, and L. W. Riley. 2001. Widespread distribution of urinary tract infections caused by a multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli clonal group. N. Engl. J. Med.345:1007-1013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Masterton, R. G., and J. A. Bochsler. 1995. High-dosage co-amoxiclav in a single dose versus 7 days of co-trimoxazole as treatment of uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection in women. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.35:129-137.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Mathai, D., R. N. Jones, M. A. Pfaller, and the SENTRY Participant Group North America. 2001. Epidemiology and frequency of resistance among pathogens causing urinary tract infections in 1,510 hospitalized patients: a report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (North America). Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.40:129-136.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    McCarty, J. M., G. Richard, W. Huck, R. M. Tucker, R. L. Tosiello, M. Shan, A. Heyd, R. M. Echols, et al. 1999. A randomized trial of short-course ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of acute urinary tract infection in women. Am. J. Med.106:292-299.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    McOsker, C. C., and P. M. Fitzpatrick. 1994. Nitrofurantoin mechanisms of action and implications for resistance development in common uropathogens. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.33(Suppl. A):23-30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2001. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 11th informational supplement, vol. 21, number 1. M100-S11. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  21. 21.↵
    Nicolle, L. E. 2001. Epidemiology of urinary tract infection. Infect. Med.18:153-162.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    Raz, R., B. Chazan, Y. Kennes, R. Colodner, E. Rottensterich, M. Dan, I. Lavi, W. Stamm, and the Israeli Urinary Tract Infection Group. 2002. Empiric use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) in the treatment of women with uncomplicated urinary tract infections, in a geographical area with a high prevalence of TMP-SMX-resistant uropathogens. Clin. Infect. Dis.34:1165-1169.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Sahm, D. F., I. A. Critchley, L. J. Kelly, J. A. Karlowsky, D. C. Mayfield, C. Thornsberry, Y. R. Mauriz, and J. Kahn. 2001. Evaluation of current activities of fluoroquinolones against gram-negative bacilli using centralized in vitro testing and electronic surveillance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.45:267-274.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    Sahm, D. F., M. K. Marsilio, and G. Piazza. 1999. Antimicrobial resistance in key bloodstream bacterial isolates: electronic surveillance with the surveillance network database-USA. Clin. Infect. Dis.29:259-263.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    Sahm, D. F., C. Thornsberry, D. C. Mayfield, M. E. Jones, and J. A. Karlowsky. 2001. Multidrug-resistant urinary tract isolates of Escherichia coli: prevalence and patient demographics in the United States in 2000. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.45:1402-1406.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    Stamm, W. E., and S. R. Norrby. 2001. Urinary tract infections: disease panorama and challenges. J. Infect. Dis.183(Suppl. 1):S1-S4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    Talan, D. A., W. E. Stamm, T. M. Hooton, G. J. Moran, T. Burke, A. Iravani, J. Reuning-Scherer, and D. A. Church. 2000. Comparison of ciprofloxacin (7 days) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (14 days) for acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis in women—a randomized trial. JAMA283:1583-1590.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Thomson, K. S., W. E. Sanders, and C. C. Sanders. 1994. USA resistance patterns among UTI pathogens. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.33(Suppl. A):9-15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    Tice, A. D. 1999. Short-course therapy of acute cystitis: a brief review of therapeutic strategies. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.43(Suppl. A):85-93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    Warren, J. W., E. Abrutyn, J. R. Hebel, J. R. Johnson, A. J. Schaeffer, and W. E. Stamm. 1999. Guidelines for antimicrobial treatment of uncomplicated acute bacterial cystitis and acute pyelonephritis in women. Clin. Infect. Dis.29:745-758.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    Zhanel, G. G., J. A. Karlowsky, G. K. M. Harding, A. Carrie, T. Mazzulli, D. E. Low, The Canadian Urinary Isolate Study Group, and D. J. Hoban. 2000. A Canadian national surveillance study of urinary tract isolates from outpatients: comparison of the activities of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ampicillin, mecillinam, nitrofurantoin, and ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.44:1089-1092.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance among Urinary Tract Infection Isolates of Escherichia coli from Female Outpatients in the United States
James A. Karlowsky, Laurie J. Kelly, Clyde Thornsberry, Mark E. Jones, Daniel F. Sahm
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Aug 2002, 46 (8) 2540-2545; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.8.2540-2545.2002

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance among Urinary Tract Infection Isolates of Escherichia coli from Female Outpatients in the United States
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance among Urinary Tract Infection Isolates of Escherichia coli from Female Outpatients in the United States
James A. Karlowsky, Laurie J. Kelly, Clyde Thornsberry, Mark E. Jones, Daniel F. Sahm
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Aug 2002, 46 (8) 2540-2545; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.8.2540-2545.2002
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Anti-Infective Agents, Urinary
Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli Infections
urinary tract infections

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596