Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Susceptibility

In Vitro Activities of Garenoxacin (BMS-284756) against Haemophilus influenzae Isolates with Different Fluoroquinolone Susceptibilities

María Pérez-Vázquez, Federico Román, Belen Aracil, Rafael Cantón, José Campos
María Pérez-Vázquez
1Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Federico Román
1Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Belen Aracil
1Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rafael Cantón
2Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
José Campos
1Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jcampos@isciii.es
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.11.3539-3541.2003
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The in vitro activity of garenoxacin (BMS-284756) against 62 clinical Haemophilus influenzae isolates with different fluoroquinolone susceptibilities was determined by the microdilution susceptibility testing method and compared with the activities of other oral quinolones and nonquinolone oral antimicrobial agents. Cefixime presented the highest intrinsic activity (MIC at which 50% of the isolates tested were inhibited [MIC50], 0.01 μg/ml), followed by garenoxacin, moxifloxacin, and ciprofloxacin (MIC50, 0.06 μg/ml), levofloxacin (MIC50, 0.12 μg/ml), cefuroxime (MIC50, 1.0 μg/ml), and amoxicillin-clavulanate (MIC50, 1.0/0.5 μg/ml), amoxicillin (MIC50, 2 μg/ml), azithromycin (MIC50, 4 μg/ml), and erythromycin (MIC50, 8 μg/ml). In strains with ciprofloxacin MICs of ≤0.06 μg/ml, ciprofloxacin and garenoxacin displayed similar MIC50s and MIC90s, one dilution lower than those of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin. For strains for which ciprofloxacin MICs were ≥0.12 μg/ml, MIC50s were similar for the four quinolones tested, although garenoxacin presented the widest activity range (0.03 to 32 μg/ml) and the highest MIC at which 90% of the isolates tested were inhibited (16.0 μg/ml). For strains without amino acid changes in the quinolone resistance determining region (QRDR) of GyrA and ParC, garenoxacin MICs were ≤0.03 μg/ml; with a single amino acid change in GyrA, garenoxacin MICs were 0.06 to 0.12 μg/ml; with one amino acid change each in GyrA and ParC, garenoxacin MICs were 0.5 to 2.0 μg/ml; one amino acid change in ParC combined with two amino acid changes in GyrA increased the MICs to ≥4 μg/ml for all assayed quinolones. We conclude that garenoxacin has excellent activity against H. influenzae, although progressive acquired resistance was observed by step-by-step mutation in the QRDR of gyrA and parC.

Garenoxacin is a novel des-fluoro(6)-quinolone that differs from earlier quinolones in its lack of a fluorine atom at the C-6 position and an isoindolin-5-yl substitution at the 7 position (17). It has reportedly shown increased activity relative to the other quinolones against gram-positive organisms (3, 15), including methicillin (oxacilin)-resistant staphylococci and some Enterococcus spp. (5). Broad antianaerobic coverage and superior activity against fastidious organisms has also been described (9). The difluoromethoxy substituent at position 8, instead of a methoxy group, has been shown to improve bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity and decrease the selection of resistant mutants (10). Garenoxacin has good oral bioavailability (11), and toxicological findings indicate low chondrotoxicity in juvenile rats, making it a potentially suitable therapy for children and adolescents (12).

Little is known about the activity of this compound against Haemophilus influenzae strains whether or not they have reduced susceptibility to other fluoroquinolones. Although fluoroquinolones remain among the most powerful in vitro antimicrobial agents against H. influenzae and are also highly effective as oral treatments of respiratory tract infections (6), resistance to them has been recognized (4, 7, 16). Therapeutic failure in community-acquired pneumonia associated with levofloxacin resistance has recently been described for H. influenzae (2). We have previously shown that strains with ciprofloxacin MICs of ≤0.06 μg/ml remain free of quinolone resistance determining region (QRDR) mutations in both gyrA and parC, while the first mutation in gyrA appears in strains with ciprofloxacin MICs of ≥0.12 μg/ml (M. Pérez-Vázquez et al., submitted for publication).

On the other hand, it is of interest to study the activities of new compounds that are to be introduced onto the market against well-characterized collections of resistant organisms (8). These studies are useful for defining the intrinsic activities of new drugs, even when resistance mechanisms may compromise these compounds.

Our study was designed to determine the comparative activity of garenoxacin (BMS-284756) and those of other orally administered quinolones and of other nonquinolone antimicrobial agents tested against H. influenzae isolates displaying different fluoroquinolone susceptibility values. It also aimed to ascertain the influence of GyrA and/or ParC QRDR amino acid changes on the activity of garenoxacin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Test isolates.A total of 62 clinical H. influenzae isolates and two reference strains from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC 49247 and ATCC 51907) were studied. This batch of strains was distributed into two different groups: (i) group I included two American clinical strains and 30 Spanish clinical isolates from the collection of the Haemophilus Reference Laboratory. They were selected on the basis of their reduced susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (MIC, ≥0.12 μg/ml). This group comprised respiratory specimens from patients with cystic fibrosis or chronic respiratory infections, obtained as part of antibiotic resistance surveillance in Spanish clinical isolates. (ii) Group II, which included a fully susceptible control group of 30 strains with ciprofloxacin MICs of ≤0.06 μg/ml, was selected and matched according to the following criteria: similar date of isolation, geographical area, clinical diagnosis, anatomical source, capsulation status, and biotype. The majority of strains were collected between 1994 and 2002 from patients living in the central area of Spain.

Susceptibility testing.Reference broth microdilution method was performed according to the NCCLS guidelines (13, 14). Haemophilus test medium was prepared with Mueller-Hinton broth (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom) supplemented with HTM supplement (Oxoid) and yeast extract (5‰) (Difco, Detroit, Mich.). Microtiter plates were inoculated to produce a final inoculum density of approximately 5 × 105 CFU/ml. This density was monitored at regular intervals by making colony counts. The inoculated plates were incubated at 35°C for 20 to 24 h in ambient air before results were interpreted. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of antibiotic that inhibited growth.

Antimicrobial agents.Garenoxacin (BMS-284756) was supplied by Bristol-Myers Squibb laboratories (Madrid, Spain). The other antimicrobial agents, including a β-lactamase inhibitor compound (amoxicillin, azithromycin, cefixime, cefuroxime, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, nalidixic acid, and clavulanate), were provided by their respective manufacturers or purchased from Sigma (Madrid, Spain).

Amplification and sequence analysis of the QRDR regions of gyrA and parC genes.One isolate was randomly selected for QRDR analysis from each group of strains with identical garenoxacin MICs (MIC range, 0.007 to 32 μg/ml). Amplification was performed in a 50-μl final volume: 5 μl of DNA template, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 μM (each) primer (Pharmacia), 200 μM (each) deoxynucleoside triphosphate, and 2.5 U of Taq polymerase (Roche). The PCR program applied was as follows: denaturation at 94°C for 5 min; 30 amplification cycles of 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 54°C for 1 min, and polymerization at 72°C for 1 min; and a final 10-min cycle at 72°C to extend amplicons fully.

A 400-bp fragment including the QRDR of gyrA and ParC was amplified. Specific primers used were the following: GYRA-F (5′-CCGCCGCGTACTATTCTCAAT-3′), GYRA-R (5′-GTTGCCATCCCCACCGCAATACCA-3′), PARC-F (5′-TCTGAACTTGGCTTAATTGCC-3′), and PARC-R (5′-GCCACGACCTTGCTCATAAAT-3′). PCR products were purified with a PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Sequencing of fragments was done on both DNA strands with the Big DyeTM terminator cycle sequencing kit (Perkin-Elmer) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The products were resolved and analyzed with an ABI PRISMR 377 DNA sequencer. Nucleotide sequences were analyzed using the DNAstar (Madison, Wis.) program.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

When we compare in vitro activities of different antimicrobial agents against the 62 selected H. influenzae isolates in terms of the MICs at which 50% of the isolates tested were inhibited (MIC50s), which normally represent modal MICs, cefixime had the highest intrinsic activity (0.01 μg/ml). This value was similar to that obtained with ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and garenoxacin (0.06 μg/ml). Amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and cefuroxime presented similar MIC50s of 1 to 2 μg/ml, and erythromycin and azitromycin were the less active agents, with MIC50s of 8 and 4 μg/ml, respectively. However, a substantial difference was observed in the MICs at which 90% of the isolates tested were inhibited (MIC90s): 0.25 μg/ml for cefixime and 2, 2, and 4 μg/ml for ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and garenoxacin, respectively. For amoxicillin, the MIC90 was 128 μg/ml; for amoxicillin-clavulanate, 8 μg/ml; for cefuroxime, 16 μg/ml; for erythromycin, 32 μg/ml; and for azithromycin, 8 μg/ml.

Table 1 shows the activity of the assayed antimicrobial agents against H. influenzae isolates of groups I and II. Levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and garenoxacin displayed similar MIC50s and MIC90s in group I of H. influenzae. For the group II strains, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and garenoxacin had markedly decreased activities. Nevertheless, for four isolates belonging to group II, MICs of garenoxacin were lower than those for ciprofloxacin; the MIC for one of them was 0.03 μg/ml for garenoxacin and 0.12 μg/ml for ciprofloxacin, while the MICs for the three additional isolates were 0.06 μg/ml for garenoxacin and 0.12 μg/ml (two strains) and 0.25 μg/ml (one strain) for ciprofloxacin.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

In vitro activities of four quinolones and different nonquinolone antimicrobials against H. influenzae isolates with different levels of susceptibility to ciprofloxacin

Table 2 shows the gyrA and parC QRDR mutations leading to amino acid substitutions in selected H. influenzae isolates of the study collection. These isolates are representative of different garenoxacin MICs from group I and group II. For comparative purposes, other quinolone MICs are also included in this table.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Quinolone susceptibility and amino acid changes in GyrA and ParC QRDR fragments from representative H. influenzae isolatesa

Garenoxacin displayed high intrinsic activity against isolates without gyrA or parC mutations, with MICs ranging from 0.007 to 0.03 μg/ml, similar to ciprofloxacin, while the moxifloxacin and levofloxacin MIC range was 0.03 to 0.12 μg/ml (Table 2). Garenoxacin displayed MICs of 0.06 to 0.12 μg/ml for isolates with a first step in the resistance mechanisms for quinolones (one amino acid change in GyrA). This value was slightly lower than that obtained with ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and levofloxacin (0.12 μg/ml). However, the existence of one amino acid change in ParC combined with two amino acid changes in GyrA drastically diminished the in vitro activity of the four assayed quinolones (Table 2).

Garenoxacin is a desfluoroquinolone with a broad spectrum of activity against both gram-positive and -negative pathogens, including fastidious strains that commonly cause community-acquired respiratory tract infections (5). The SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program (2000) demonstrated that the activity of garenoxacin against H. influenzae was similar to that of other quinolones, such as ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin (MIC90, ≤0.016 to 0.03 μg/ml) (1), consistent with data obtained in the present study for strains without amino acid changes in the QRDRs of gyrA and/or parC.

The H. influenzae population tested in our study includes both strains with and without resistance mechanisms for quinolones. The overall activity of garenoxacin was similar to that of ciprofloxacin (MIC90, 4.0 μg/ml), but it was slightly lower than those of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin. To gain insight into garenoxacin activity, we separated our H. influenzae collection according to its susceptibility to ciprofloxacin; for fully ciprofloxacin-susceptible isolates (group I), ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and garenoxacin MIC90s were similar (0.03 μg/ml), and for moxifloxacin the MIC90 was one log2 dilution higher. In group II, garenoxacin was the quinolone with the lowest activity, since its MIC90 was at least two log2 dilutions higher than that of the other tested quinolones, although in this group, the garenoxacin MIC range included lower values (0.03 μg/ml for garenoxacin, 0.06 μg/ml for moxifloxacin, and 0.12 μg/ml for ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin). This result is concordant with the fact that the older generation of quinolones (ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin) have relatively low gram-positive activity, and other new generation quinolones (including desquinolone) were modified to enhance mainly gram-positive activity.

We have shown that the primary target of garenoxacin in H. influenzae is DNA gyrase, the same as that of ciprofloxacin (7). A first amino acid modification in the QRDR of GyrA increased the garenoxacin MIC to 0.06 to 0.12 μg/ml; a second amino acid change in the QRDR of ParC enhanced its MIC to 0.5 to 2 μg/ml; and a double amino acid change in GyrA yielded the highest MICs for the strains in this collection (4.0 to 32 μg/ml). This increase in MICs was similar for ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and levofloxacin, suggesting a step-by-step resistance mechanism common to the four quinolones tested.

In summary, we conclude that there was excellent garenoxacin activity against H. influenzae strains lacking quinolone resistance mechanisms. However, some amino acid changes in the QRDR region of GyrA and ParC clearly decreased the susceptibility of H. influenzae to garenoxacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin, reaching a MIC of 32 μg/ml for strains with two modifications in the QRDR region of GyrA and one modification in the QRDR of ParC.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Janet Hinder for providing us with two quinolone-resistant H. influenzae isolates.

M. Pérez-Vázquez is a recipient of grant 02/0056 from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Spain. This study was funded by a research grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb and a fellowship (99/0304) from the Spanish FIS agency.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 5 May 2003.
    • Returned for modification 29 July 2003.
    • Accepted 1 August 2003.
  • Copyright © 2003 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Biedenbach, D. J., R. N. Jones, and M. A. Pfaller. 2001. Activity of BMS284756 against 2,681 recent clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis: report from The SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2000) in Europe, Canada and the United States. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.39:245-250.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Bastida, T., M. Pérez-Vázquez, J. Campos, M. C. Cortés-Lletget, F. Román, F. Tubau, A. G. de la Campa, and C. Alonso-Tarrés. Therapeutic failure in a case of pneumonia due to levofloxacin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae.Emerg. Infect. Dis., in press.
  3. 3.↵
    Boswell, F. J., J. M. Andrews, and R. Wise. 2001. Comparison of the in vitro activities of BMS-284756 and four fluoroquinolones against Streptococcus pneumoniae.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.48:446-447.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Campos, J., F. Román, M. Georgiou, C. García, R. Gómez-Lus, R. Cantón, H. Escobar, and F. Baquero. 1996. Long-term persistence of ciprofloxacin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae in patients with cystic fibrosis. J. Infect. Dis.174:1345-1347.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Fung-Tomc, J. C., B. Minassian, B. Kolek, E. Huczko, L. Aleksunes, T. Stickle, T. Washo, E. Gradelski, L. Valera, and D. P. Bonner. 2000. Antibacterial spectrum of a novel des-fluoro(6) quinolone, BMS-284756. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.44:3351-3356.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    García-Rodriguez, J. A., F. Baquero, J. Garcia de Lomas, and L. Aguilar. 1999. Antimicrobial susceptibility of 1,422 H. influenzae isolates from respiratory tract infections in Spain. Results of 1-year (1996-97) multicenter surveillance study. Infection27:265-267.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Georgiou, M., R. Muñoz, F. Roman, R. Cantón, R. Gómez-Lus, J. Campos, and A. De la Campa. 1996. Ciprofloxacin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae strains possess mutations in analogous positions of GyrA and ParC. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.40:1741-1744.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Hartman-Neumann, S., K. DenBleyker, L. A. Pelosi, L. E. Lawrence, J. F. Barrett, and T. J. Dougherty. 2001. Selection and genetic characterization of Streptococcus pneumoniae mutants resistant to Des-F(6) quinolone BMS-284756. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.45:2865-2870.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Hoellman, D. B., L. M. Kelley, M. A. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 2001. Comparative antianaerobic activity of BMS-284756. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.45:589-592.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Ince, D., X. Zang, L. C. Silver, and D. C. Hooper. 2002. Dual targeting of DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV: target interactions of garenoxacin (BMS-284756, T-3811ME), a new desfluoroquinolone. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.46:3370-3380.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Lister, P. D. 2003. Impact of AUC/MIC ratios on the pharmacodynamics of the des-F(6) quinolone garenoxacin (BMS-284756) is similar to other fluoroquinolones. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.51:199-202.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Nagai, A., M. Miyazaki, T. Morita, S. Furubo, K. Kizawa, H. Fukumoto, T. Sanzen, H. Hayakawa, and Y. Kawamura. 2002. Comparative articular toxicity of garenoxacin, a novel quinolone antimicrobial agent, in juvenile beagle dogs. J. Toxicol. Sci.27:219-228.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2001. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 6th ed. Approved standard M7-A6. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  14. 14.↵
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2001. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: eleventh informational supplement. NCCLS document M100-S11. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  15. 15.↵
    Pankuch, G. A., K. Nagai, T. A. Davies, M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 2002. Antipneumococcal activity of BMS 284756 compared to those of six other agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.46:251-254.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Pérez-Vázquez, M., F. Román, M. C. Varela, R. Cantón, and J. Campos. 2003. Activities of thirteen quinolones by three susceptibility testing methods against a collection of Haemophilus influenzae isolates with different levels of susceptibility to ciprofloxacin: evidence for cross-resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.51:147-151.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Takahata, M., J. Mitsuyama, Y. Yamashiro, M. Yonezawa, H. Araki, Y. Todo, S. Minami, Y. Watanabe, and H. Narita. 1999. In vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activities of ME, a novel des-F(6)-quinolone. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.43:1077-1084.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
In Vitro Activities of Garenoxacin (BMS-284756) against Haemophilus influenzae Isolates with Different Fluoroquinolone Susceptibilities
María Pérez-Vázquez, Federico Román, Belen Aracil, Rafael Cantón, José Campos
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Oct 2003, 47 (11) 3539-3541; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.11.3539-3541.2003

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Vitro Activities of Garenoxacin (BMS-284756) against Haemophilus influenzae Isolates with Different Fluoroquinolone Susceptibilities
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
In Vitro Activities of Garenoxacin (BMS-284756) against Haemophilus influenzae Isolates with Different Fluoroquinolone Susceptibilities
María Pérez-Vázquez, Federico Román, Belen Aracil, Rafael Cantón, José Campos
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Oct 2003, 47 (11) 3539-3541; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.11.3539-3541.2003
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

anti-infective agents
fluoroquinolones
Haemophilus influenzae
quinolones

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596