Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Susceptibility

Resazurin Microtiter Assay Plate Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Susceptibilities to Second-Line Drugs: Rapid, Simple, and Inexpensive Method

Anandi Martin, Mirtha Camacho, Françoise Portaels, Juan Carlos Palomino
Anandi Martin
1Mycobacteriology Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp 2000, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: amartin@itg.be
Mirtha Camacho
2Tuberculosis Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Laboratorios de Salud, Miraflores, La Paz, Bolivia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Françoise Portaels
1Mycobacteriology Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp 2000, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juan Carlos Palomino
1Mycobacteriology Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp 2000, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.11.3616-3619.2003
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The emergence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis calls for new, rapid drug susceptibility tests. We have tested 150 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates against the second-line drugs ethionamide, kanamycin, capreomycin, ofloxacin, and para-aminosalicylic acid by the colorimetric resazurin microtiter assay and the proportion method. By visual reading, MICs were obtained after 8 days. A very good correlation between results by the colorimetric resazurin microtiter assay and the proportion method was obtained. The colorimetric resazurin microtiter assay is inexpensive, rapid, and simple to perform, and implementation of the assay is feasible for low-resource countries.

The global situation with respect to tuberculosis (TB) has worsened with the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB worldwide (5, 36). MDR TB, defined by resistance to at least isoniazid and rifampin, is ubiquitous (12) and is most prevalent in some countries of Eastern Europe as well as China and India (14, 47). Immigration from areas where TB is endemic, human immunodeficiency virus infection (2, 16, 23, 28), homelessness, poor socioeconomic situations (6, 21), and prison populations (10, 39, 41) are among the responsible factors. Some patients with MDR TB do not respond to treatment with first-line drugs (isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol, pyrazinamide, and streptomycin) (17). Several studies have shown that MDR TB can be cured by a combination of second-line drugs under DOTS-Plus, the treatment strategy proposed by the World Health Organization to address the management of MDR TB in settings with good control programs (15, 18, 22, 30, 35, 48). However, these drugs are expensive, have to be taken for long periods, and can cause adverse reactions (48). Drug susceptibility testing (DST) with Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium or Middlebrook agar requires 3 to 6 weeks to obtain results (7, 8). Critical drug concentrations for second-line drugs have not been completely established. The development of new, rapid DST which is easy to use and inexpensive is thus an urgent priority for determining the susceptibility to second-line drugs (29, 32). A rapid and inexpensive colorimetric method based on the oxidation-reduction indicators Alamar blue and MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium] have been successfully used for determining MICs of first-line drugs in DST of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (1, 9, 20, 31, 38, 49). Since resazurin has been recently identified as the main component of Alamar blue (34, 43), we recently developed a resazurin microtiter assay (REMA) plate (37) for detecting MDR TB and demonstrated a very good correlation between results by this method and the proportion method (PM). In this study we evaluated the second-line drugs ethionamide (ETH), kanamycin monosulfate (KAN), capreomycin sulfate (CAP), ofloxacin (OFX), and para-aminosalicylic acid (PAS) with clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis by the colorimetric method using the REMA plate, and we compared the results with those of the PM.

One hundred fifty clinical isolates from Bolivia, Peru, and countries in Eastern Europe were studied. Fifty percent of the strains were MDR TB, 14% were polyresistant to first-line drugs, and 36% were susceptible. M. tuberculosis H37Rv (ATCC 27294) was used as the susceptible control.

ETH, OFX, and CAP were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Mo.); KAN was obtained from ICN Biomedicals, Inc. (Aurora, Ohio); and PAS (4-aminosalicylic acid sodium salt hydrate, 98%) was obtained from Acros Organic NV (Geel, Belgium). Stock solutions at 1 mg/ml were filter sterilized and stored at −20°C. Working solutions were prepared at four times the final higher concentration in 7H9-S broth (Middlebrook 7H9 supplemented with 0.1% Casitone, 0.5% glycerol, and 10% OADC [oleic acid, albumin, dextrose, and catalase]; Becton-Dickinson). The final drug concentrations tested were as follows: for PAS and OFX, 8 μg/ml; for ETH and KAN, 20 μg/ml; and for CAP, 10 μg/ml. Resazurin sodium salt powder from Acros Organic NV was prepared at 0.02% (wt/vol) in distilled water, sterilized by filtration, and stored at 4°C for up to 1 week.

Isolates were freshly subcultured on LJ medium. The inoculum was prepared in 7H9-S broth, adjusted spectrophotometrically to a no. 1 McFarland tube standard, and further diluted 1:10 in 7H9-S broth for the test.

The REMA plate assay was carried out as described by Palomino et al. (37). Briefly, 100 μl of 7H9-S broth was dispensed in each well of a sterile flat-bottom 96-well plate, and serial twofold dilutions of each drug were prepared directly in the plate. One hundred microliters of inoculum was added to each well. A growth control and a sterile control were also included for each isolate. Sterile water was added to all perimeter wells to avoid evaporation during the incubation. The plate was covered, sealed in a plastic bag, and incubated at 37°C under a normal atmosphere. After 7 days of incubation, 30 μl of resazurin solution was added to each well, and the plate was reincubated overnight. A change in color from blue to pink indicated the growth of bacteria, and the MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of drug that prevented this change in color. The drug concentration ranges used were as follows: for ETH and KAN, 0.62 to 20 μg/ml; for OFX and PAS, 0.25 to 8 μg/ml; and for CAP, 0.3 to 10 μg/ml.

The PM was performed with 7H11 agar or LJ medium (for PAS) (7, 8) with the following recommended critical drug concentrations: for PAS, 0.5 μg/ml; for ETH and CAP, 10 μg/ml; for OFX, 2 μg/ml; and for KAN, 6 μg/ml (3, 7, 8, 33).

To study the sensitivity of resistance detection by the REMA plate method and assuming similar growth kinetics, mixed populations of resistant and susceptible strains were prepared and tested. For each drug and in separate experiments, an increasing proportion (0 to 16%) of the resistant strain was added to the susceptible H37Rv strain, keeping the number of bacteria to a no. 1 McFarland tube standard. We determined the percentage of resistance by visual reading of the MICs.

The tentative breakpoints for each drug were based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (50) and calculated by using MedCalc (Mariakerke, Belgium) software, which gives the corresponding cutoff point with the best separation by the dot plot diagram. To evaluate the performance of the test, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values were calculated.

By visual reading of the assay plates, the MICs of the second-line drugs OFX, KAN, CAP, ETH, and PAS for 150 isolates of M. tuberculosis were determined, and the results were obtained after 8 days of incubation. Results of testing by the PM were available after 3 weeks. Isolates with discordant results were reevaluated by both methods. Table 1 shows the results of DST obtained by the PM and the REMA plate method. Among the 150 isolates, 31 were resistant to ETH, 29 were resistant to KAN, 9 were resistant to PAS, 8 were resistant to OFX, and 19 were resistant to CAP by the PM.

Complete agreement in results was found for KAN, PAS, and OFX by the two methods. Tentative breakpoint concentrations were defined as follows: for PAS and OFX, 2.0 μg/ml; and for KAN, 2.5 μg/ml. The tentative breakpoint concentration of ETH was 2.5 μg/ml. One discordant result was a finding of resistance by the PM and a finding of susceptibility by the REMA plate method at drug MICs of 1.25 μg/ml. The strain with these results was MDR. For CAP we propose a tentative breakpoint concentration of 2.5 μg/ml. Three isolates gave discordant results, as they were resistant by the PM and susceptible by the REMA plate method at drug MICs of 1.25 and 2.5 μg/ml, respectively. These strains were also MDR. The overall performance of the REMA plate method for the five antimicrobial agents in comparison with that of the PM was very good. The specificity was 100% for the five drugs, and the sensitivity ranged from 96.8 to 100%; for CAP the sensitivity was 84.2%. The accuracy of the REMA plate method was very good.

To determine if the REMA plate method could detect small populations of drug-resistant strains in the presence of a large proportion of susceptible strains by visual reading, we mixed increasing concentrations of the resistant strain (0 to 16%) with the susceptible H37Rv strain and tested it with the relevant drug. Figure 1 shows that the REMA plate method was able to detect small populations of each resistant strain. Bacterial populations containing 1% or more of drug-resistant bacilli could easily be detected by visual reading of MICs of KAN, ETH, OFX, and CAP that were higher than their cutoff values. When PAS was used, we were able to detect 4% of the resistant bacteria.

In this study, for the first time, DST of 150 M. tuberculosis isolates has been performed with five second-line drugs by the REMA plate method. With the spread of MDR TB, there is an increasing demand for DST for second-line drugs. The development of better and faster diagnostic assays is an urgent priority for the management of MDR TB (32). The turnaround time is important for the patient to receive an early start of appropriate treatment. Standard laboratory methods are slow, with results not available before 4 to 8 weeks after testing. An inexpensive and rapid method for MDR TB detection and for DST of second-line drugs is desirable for low-resource countries. One of the few studies of MDR TB detection was a multicenter study by Pfyffer et al. (40), who examined second-line drugs and other antibiotics by using the BACTEC 460 system. This system is rapid and reliable (45, 46), but it requires heavy equipment and the use of radioisotopes, which limits its application. Preliminary studies of DST of MDR TB isolates using MTT, Alamar blue, or resazurin showed a good correlation with the conventional PM (1, 13, 19, 20, 31, 37, 49). The limitation of some proprietary dyes is the lack of knowledge of their compositions (27). Recently, resazurin, a nonproprietary product, has been identified as the main component of Alamar blue (34, 43). The REMA plate method has proven to be, in recent experience, a reliable method for the detection of MDR TB (37). In this study, the REMA plate method has also shown a high level of agreement with the conventional PM. Results are easily determined visually by reading the change to a stable color from blue to pink. The results can be also determined by spectophotometry or fluorometry, but the cost of equipment is high and would limit its application in low-resource countries. By using populations of each resistant strain mixed with the susceptible strain H37Rv, the REMA plate method could detect the presence of the resistant population at a level as low as 1%. Our proposed breakpoint values fully agree with the drug MICs of previous studies (Table 2). An advantage of the microtiter format is that it allows the screening of several isolates in a short period of time. One disadvantage, however, is biosafety, since the plates require the use of liquid medium and could generate aerosols. It has recently been shown that this format can be adapted for screw-cap tubes to avoid this situation (1, 19, 31). Cost is an important factor for low-resource countries. Resazurin greatly reduces the cost of this method, to approximately $3 for each strain; it is even cheaper than MTT. Therefore, it would be feasible to implement this method in laboratories with limited resources. Tests like the REMA plate method described here have the potential in the future to be the method of choice for DST of M. tuberculosis and other mycobacteria. Our study helps to optimize the critical concentrations of second-line drugs for establishing this type of test.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Sensitivity of detection of resistant strains by visual reading. For each resistant strain (ETH, strain 99-1877; PAS, 99-3304; CAP, 00-1071; OFX, 01-2613; and KAN, 01-2614), a culture of H37Rv containing various proportions of the resistant strain (0 to 16%) was tested by the REMA plate method for MIC determination.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Susceptibility testing of 150 isolates of M. tuberculosis by the PM and the REMA plate method

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Comparison of MICs obtained by different studies with M. tuberculosis

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the European Commission RDG (INCO-DEV Programme), project No. ICA4-CT-2001-10087, and by the Damien Foundation, Brussels, Belgium.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 17 April 2003.
    • Returned for modification 18 June 2003.
    • Accepted 1 July 2003.
  • Copyright © 2003 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Abate, G., R. N. Mshana, and H. Miorner. 1998. Evaluation of a colorimetric assay based on 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) for rapid detection of rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis.2:1011-1016.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    Barnes, P. F., D. L. Lakey, and W. J. Burman. 2002. Tuberculosis in patients with HIV infection. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am.16:107-126.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Bastian, I., and R. Colebunders. 1999. Treatment and prevention of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Drugs58:633-661.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.
    Bastian, I., L. Rigouts, J. C. Palomino, and F. Portaels. 2001. Kanamycin susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis using Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tube and a colorimetric method. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.45:1934-1936.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Bloch, A. B., G. M. Cauthen, I. M. Onorato, K. G. Dansbury, G. D. Kelly, C. R. Driver, and D. E. Snider, Jr. 1994. Nationwide survey of drug-resistant tuberculosis in the United States. JAMA271:665-671.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Brudney, K., and J. Dobkin. 1991. Resurgent tuberculosis in New York City. Human immunodeficiency virus, homelessness, and the decline of tuberculosis control programs. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis.144:745-749.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Canetti, G., F. Froman, J. Grosset, P. Hauduroy, M. Langerova, H. T. Mahler, G. Meissner, D. A. Mitchison, and L. Sula. 1963. Mycobacteria: laboratory methods for testing drug sensitivity and resistance. Bull. W. H. O.29:565-578.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Canetti, G., W. Fox, A. Khomenko, H. T. Mahler, N. K. Menon, D. A. Mitchison, N. Rist, and N. A. Smelev. 1969. Advances in techniques of testing mycobacterial drug sensitivity, and the use of sensitivity tests in tuberculosis control programmes. Bull. W. H. O.41:21-43.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Caviedes, L., J. Delgado, and R. H. Gilman. 2002. Tetrazolium microplate assay as a rapid and inexpensive colorimetric method for determination of antibiotic susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol.40:1873-1874.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Chaves, F., F. Dronda, M. D. Cave, M. Alonso-Sanz, A. Gonzalez-Lopez, K. D. Eisenach, A. Ortega, L. Lopez-Cubero, I. Fernandez-Martin, S. Catalan, and J. H. Bates. 1997. A longitudinal study of transmission of tuberculosis in a large prison population. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.155:719-725.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.
    Chen, C. H., J. F. Shih, P. J. Lindholm-Levy, and L. B. Heifets. 1989. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of rifabutin, ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated before treatment of patients in Taiwan. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis.140:987-989.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Cohn, D. L., F. Bustreo, M. C. Raviglione, et al. 1997. Drug-resistant tuberculosis: review of the worldwide situation and the WHO/IUATLD Global Surveillance Project. Clin. Infect. Dis.24(Suppl. 1):S121-S130.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Collins, L. A., and S. G. Franzblau. 1997. Microplate Alamar blue assay versus BACTEC 460 system for high-throughput screening of compounds against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.41:1004-1009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Espinal, M. A., A. Laszlo, L. Simonsen, F. Boulahbal, S. J. Kim, A. Reniero, S. Hoffner, H. L. Rieder, N. Binkin, C. Dye, R. Williams, M. C. Raviglione, et al. 2001. Global trends in resistance to antituberculosis drugs. N. Engl. J. Med.344:1294-1303.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Espinal, M. A., C. Dye, M. Raviglione, and A. Kochi. 1999. Rational ‘DOTS plus’ for the control of MDR-TB. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis.3:561-563.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Espinal, M. A., K. Laserson, M. Camacho, Z. Fusheng, S. J. Kim, R. E. Tlali, I. Smith, P. Suarez, M. L. Antunes, A. G. George, N. Martin-Casabona, P. Simelane, K. Weyer, N. Binkin, and M. C. Raviglione. 2001. Determinants of drug-resistant tuberculosis: analysis of 11 countries. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis.5:887-893.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Espinal, M. A., S. J. Kim, P. G. Suarez, K. M. Kam, A. G. Khomenko, G. B. Migliori, J. Baez, A. Kochi, C. Dye, and M. C. Raviglione. 2000. Standard short-course chemotherapy for drug-resistant tuberculosis: treatment outcomes in 6 countries. JAMA283:2537-2545.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Farmer, P., and J. Y. Kim. 1998. Community based approaches to the control of multidrug resistant tuberculosis: introducing “DOTS-plus.” BMJ317:671-674.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Foongladda, S., D. Roengsanthia, W. Arjrattanakool, C. Chuchottaworn, A. Chaiprasert, and S. G. Franzblau. 2002. Rapid and simple MTT method for rifampicin and isoniazid susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis.6:1118-1122.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    Franzblau, S. G., R. S. Witzig, J. C. McLaughlin, P. Torres, G. Madico, A. Hernandez, M. T. Degnan, M. B Cook, V. K. Quenzer, R. M. Ferguson, and R. H. Gilman. 1998. Rapid, low-technology MIC determination with clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates by using the microplate Alamar Blue assay. J. Clin. Microbiol.36:362-366.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    Frieden, T. R., T. Sterling, A. Pablos-Mendez, J. O. Kilburn, G. M. Cauthen, and S. W. Dooley. 1993. The emergence of drug-resistant tuberculosis in New York City. N. Engl. J. Med.328:521-526.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Gupta, R., M. C. Raviglione, and M. A. Espinal. 2001. Should tuberculosis programmes invest in second-line treatments for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB)? Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis.5:1078-1079.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Harries, A. D., D. Maher, B. Mvula, and D. Nyangulu. 1995. An audit of HIV testing and HIV serostatus in tuberculosis patients, Blantyre, Malawi. Tuber. Lung Dis.76:413-417.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.
    Heifets, L. B., and P. J. Lindholm-Levy. 1987. Bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium complex. Tubercle68:267-276.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.
    Heifets, L. B., P. J. Lindholm-Levy, and M. Flory. 1991. Comparison of bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of isoniazid and ethionamide against Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis.143:268-270.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.
    Heifets, L., and P. Lindholm-Levy. 1989. Comparison of bactericidal activities of streptomycin, amikacin, kanamycin, and capreomycin against Mycobacterium avium and M. tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.33:1298-1301.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    Horobin, R. W. 2001. The problem of proprietary dyes, with special reference to Alamar blue, a proprietary dye revealed. Biotech. Histochem.76:163-164.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Kazionny, B., C. D. Wells, H. Lue, N. Gusseynova, and V. Molotilov. 2002. Implications of the growing HIV-1 epidemic for tuberculosis control in Russia. Lancet358:1513-1514.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    Loddenkemper, R., D. Sagebiel, and A. Brendel. 2002. Strategies against multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Eur. Respir. J. Suppl.36:66s-77s.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Mitnick, C., J. Bayona, E. Palacios, S. Shin, J. Furin, F. Alcantara, E. Sanchez, M. Sarria, M. Becerra, M. C. Fawzi, S. Kapiga, D. Neuberg, J. H. Maguire, J. Y. Kim, and P. Farmer. 2003. Community-based therapy for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Lima, Peru. N. Engl. J. Med.348:119-128.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    Mshana, R. N., G. Tadesse, G. Abate, and H. Miörner. 1998. Use of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide for rapid detection of rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol.36:1214-1219.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    Nachega, J. B., and R. E. Chaisson. 2003. Tuberculosis drug resistance: a global threat. Clin. Infect. Dis.36:S24-S30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    NCCLS. 2000. Susceptibility testing of Mycobacteria, Nocardia, and other aerobic actinomycetes; tentative standard, 2nd ed. Document M24-T2. NCCLS, Wayne, Pa.
  34. 34.↵
    O'Brien, J., I. Wilson, T. Orton, and F. Pognan. 2000. Investigation of the Alamar blue (resazurin) fluorescent dye for the assessment of mammalian cell cytotoxicity. Eur. J. Biochem.267:5421-5426.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    Pablos-Mendez, A., D. K. Gowda, and T. R. Frieden. 2002. Controlling multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and access to expensive drugs: a rational framework. Bull. W. H. O.80:489-495.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    Pablos-Mendez, A., M. C. Raviglione, A. Laszlo, N. Binkin, H. L. Rieder, F. Bustreo, D. L. Cohn, C. S. Lambregts-van Weezenbeek, S. J. Kim, P. Chaulet, P. Nunn, et al. 1998. Global surveillance for antituberculosis-drug resistance, 1994-1997. N. Engl. J. Med.338:1641-1649.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    Palomino, J.-C., A. Martin, M. Camacho, H. Guerra, J. Swings, and F. Portaels. 2002. Resazurin microtiter assay plate: simple and inexpensive method for detection of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.46:2720-2722.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    Palomino, J. C., and F. Portaels. 1999. Simple procedure for drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis using a commercial colorimetic assay. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.18:380-383.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    Pfyffer, G. E., A. Strassle, T. Van Gorkum, F. Portaels, L. Rigouts, C. Mathieu, F. Mirzoyev, H. Traore, and J. D. Van Embden. 2001. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in prison inmates, Azerbaijan. Emerg. Infect. Dis.7:855-861.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    Pfyffer, G. E., D. A. Bonato, A. Ebrahimzadeh, W. Gross, J. Hotaling, J. Kornblum, A. Laszlo, G. Roberts, M. Salfinger, F. Wittwer, and S. Siddiqi. 1999. Multicenter laboratory validation of susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis against classical second-line and newer antimicrobial drugs by using the radiometric BACTEC 460 technique and the proportion method with solid media. J. Clin. Microbiol.37:3179-3186.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    Portaels, F., L. Rigouts, and I. Bastian. 1999. Addressing multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in penitentiary hospitals and in the general population of the former Soviet Union. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis.3:582-588.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.
    Pracharktam, R., K. Angkananukool, and A. Vibhagool. 2001. In vitro susceptibility testing of levofloxacin and ofloxacin by microtiter plate Alamar blue against multidrug and non multidrug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Thailand. J. Med. Assoc. Thail.84:1241-1245.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    Rasmussen, E. V. 1999. Use of fluorescent redox indicators to evaluate cell proliferation and viability. In Vitro Mol. Toxicol.12:47-58.
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.
    Rastogi, N., V. Labrousse, and K. S. Goh. 1996. In vitro activities of fourteen antimicrobial agents against drug susceptible and resistant clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and comparative intracellular activities against the virulent H37Rv strain in human macrophages. Curr. Microbiol.33:167-175.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    Roberts, G. D., N. L. Goodman, L. Heifets, H. W. Larsh, T. H. Lindner, J. K. McClatchy, M. R. McGinnis, S. H. Siddiqi, and P. Wright. 1983. Evaluation of the BACTEC radiometric method for recovery of mycobacteria and drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from acid-fast smear-positive specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol.18:689-696.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    Siddiqi, S. H., J. P. Libonati, and G. Middlebrook. 1981. Evaluation of rapid radiometric method for drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol.13:908-912.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    World Health Organization. 2001. Global tuberculosis control. WHO. report WHO/CDS/B2001.287. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  48. 48.↵
    World Health Organization. 2000. Guidelines for establishing DOTS-Plus pilot projects for the management of multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDRTB). WHO report WHO/ODS/TB/2000.279. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  49. 49.↵
    Yajko, D. M., J. J. Madej, M. V. Lancaster, C. A. Sanders, V. L. Cawthon, B. Gee, A. Babst, and W. K. Hadley. 1995. Colorimetric method for determining MICs of antimicrobial agents for Mycobacterium tuberculosis.J. Clin. Microbiol.33:2324-2327.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    Zeig, M. H., and G. Campbell. 1993. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin. Chem.39:561-577.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Resazurin Microtiter Assay Plate Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Susceptibilities to Second-Line Drugs: Rapid, Simple, and Inexpensive Method
Anandi Martin, Mirtha Camacho, Françoise Portaels, Juan Carlos Palomino
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Oct 2003, 47 (11) 3616-3619; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.11.3616-3619.2003

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Resazurin Microtiter Assay Plate Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Susceptibilities to Second-Line Drugs: Rapid, Simple, and Inexpensive Method
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Resazurin Microtiter Assay Plate Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Susceptibilities to Second-Line Drugs: Rapid, Simple, and Inexpensive Method
Anandi Martin, Mirtha Camacho, Françoise Portaels, Juan Carlos Palomino
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Oct 2003, 47 (11) 3616-3619; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.11.3616-3619.2003
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

antitubercular agents
microbial sensitivity tests
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Oxazines
Xanthenes

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596