In Vitro Activities of Dalbavancin and Nine Comparator Agents against Anaerobic Gram-Positive Species and Corynebacteria

The development of resistance in gram-positive organisms, including Staphylococcus aureus strains that are resistant to both oxacillin and vancomycin (9), has accentuated the need for new antimicrobial agents. Dalbavancin (BI 397) is a novel semisynthetic amide derivative of the glycopeptide MDL 62,476 that has enhanced activity against aerobic gram-positive species (2, 4, 5). Due to its very long half-life (9 to 12 days), it is under investigation at a dosage interval of 1 week. Little has been published regarding its activity against either fastidious aerobic bacteria or anaerobes. In order to evaluate the potential efficacy of dalbavancin against this broad spectrum of isolates, we determined its comparative in vitro activity against 290 recent aerobic and anaerobic clinical isolates.

Strains were recently isolated from clinical specimens obtained from adult patients between 1996 and 2002 and were identified by standard criteria (6, 10). The strains were consecutive isolates, except when needed to make at least 10 isolates per species. Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 and Eubacterium lentum ATCC 43055 were tested simultaneously with the appropriate plates and environments. The numbers and species of clinical isolates tested are given in Table 1.

The suppliers of standard laboratory powders were as follows: dalbavancin, Versicor, Inc. (King of Prussia, Pa.); vancomycin, Eli Lilly & Co. (Indianapolis, Ind.); linezolid and clindamycin, Pharmacia (Kalamazoo, Mich.); quinupristin-dalfopristin, Aventis Pharmaceuticals (Somerset, N.J.); imipenem, Merck & Co. (West Point, Pa.); piperacillin-tazobactam, Wyeth-Ayerst (Philadelphia, Pa.); and metronidazole, Searle (Skokie, Ill.).

Susceptibility testing was performed according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) standards (7, 8) by using an agar dilution method with (i) Mueller-Hinton agar and an inoculum of 10⁴ CFU per spot for corynebacteria or (ii) brucella agar supplemented with hemin, vitamin K₁, and 5% laked sheep blood and an inoculum of 10⁵ CFU per spot for anaerobic species. Daptomycin was supplemented with Ca²⁺ (50 mg/liter) as suggested by the manufacturer.

The results of the study are shown in Table 1. Overall, 263 of 290 (91%) of isolates tested were inhibited by ≤1 μg of dalbavancin/ml. Dalbavancin exhibited excellent in vitro activity against the gram-positive strains tested with the exception of several Lactobacillus species. Dalbavancin was typically 1 to 3 dilutions more active than vancomycin against most of the strains and fivefold more active against C. innocuum. Dalbavancin (MIC₉₀ [MIC at which 90% of the isolates tested are inhibited], 8 μg/ml) was less active than vancomycin (MIC₉₀, 1 μg/ml) against C. clostridioforme, a gram-negative-appearing species, but had MICs similar to those of daptomycin and linezolid. Against three strains of C. difficile for which the MICs of linezolid and quinupristin-dalfopristin were 8 μg/ml, dalbavancin had MICs of 0.125 to 0.25 μg/ml.

Dalbavancin inhibited all Corynebacterium species, including Corynebacteriumamycolatum and Corynebacteriumjeikeium, at ≤1 μg/ml (MIC₉₀, 0.5 μg/ml). Vancomycin, linezolid, and quinupristin-dalfopristin had similar activities against corynebacteria; daptomycin was more active against Corynebacteriumamycolatum (MIC₉₀, 0.06 μg/ml) but was markedly less active against other Corynebacterium spp. (MIC₉₀, 8 μg/ml). Actinomyces israelii strains that were resistant to daptomycin and linezolid were susceptible to dalbavancin, which was two- to sixfold more active than vancomycin. Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei strains that were resistant to vancomycin also required >32 μg of dalbavancin/ml for inhibition. One strain of Lactobacillus oris required 4 μg of dalbavancin/ml for inhibition. One strain of Eubacterium saburreum required 2 μg of dalbavancin/ml for inhibition. Overall, 263 of 290 (91%) of isolates tested were inhibited by doses of ≤1 μg of dalbavancin/ml.

Dalbavancin demonstrated potent activity (<1 μg/ml) against a broad spectrum of gram-positive anaerobes and fastidious aerobes including Actinomyces species, Propionibacterium spp., Peptostreptococcus spp., and Clostridium species, including Clostridiumperfringens and Clostridiumdifficile but excluding Clostridiumclostridioforme. Dalbavancin was typically 1 to 3 dilutions more active than vancomycin against most of the strains, and fivefold more active against Clostridiuminnocuum. Dalbavancin was less active than vancomycin against Clostridiumclostridioforme, a gram-negative-appearing species, but had MICs similar to those of daptomycin and linezolid. Dalbavancin had MICs of 0.125 to 0.25 μg/ml against three strains of Clostridiumdifficile with linezolid and quinupristin-dalfopristin MICs of 8 μg/ml. Its overall activity compared favorably with that of the other agents tested.

Lactobacilli have been associated with vaginal health, whereas depletion has been associated with an increased risk of urinary tract infections and bacterial vaginosis (1, 11). Many patients self-medicate and take probiotic products containing Lactobacillus acidophilus whenever placed on antimicrobial agents. Glycopeptides have variable activity against Lactobacillus species; this appears to be due to the pentapeptide structure in nascent cell wall peptidoglycan (3). Goldstein et al. (4) reported on the activity of MDL 63,246, a precursor to dalbavancin, against a very limited number of Lactobacillus strains and found it to be active against Lactobacillusacidophilus, whereas Lactobacilluscasei, Lactobacillus fermentans, and Lactobacillusplantarum required higher concentrations for inhibition. In the present study, dalbavancin had limited activity (MICs ≥ 32 μg/ml) against Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacilluscasei but was active against Lactobacillusfermentans (MICs ≤ 0.25 μg/ml); this finding could be viewed as a positive health factor allowing maintenance of the normal vaginal flora. Its activity against other Lactobacillus spp., such as Lactobacilluscatenaforme, Lactobacillusfermentans, and Lactobacillusplantarum, showed inhibition at ≤1 μg/ml and, given appropriate pharmacokinetics, might allow its use in the therapy of infections caused by those species.

The activity of dalbavancin against our corynebacteria isolates was generally equivalent to that of vancomycin. Dalbavancin inhibited all Corynebacterium spp., including Corynebacteriumamycolatum and Corynebacterium jeikeium, at ≤1 μg/ml (MIC₉₀ = 0.5 μg/ml). Linezolid and quinupristin-dalfopristin also had similar activities. In a previous study (3), the dalbavancin MIC range for a smaller number of Corynebacterium isolates was found to be <0.03 to 0.13 μg/ml. These differences may be due to actual differences in activity against various strains or species or to the different methodologies used (agar dilution in the present study versus broth microdilution in the earlier study).

In conclusion, dalbavancin exhibited excellent in vitro activity against most of the gram-positive strains tested, with 263 of 290 (91%) of isolates inhibited by ≤1 μg/ml. Dalbavancin warrants clinical evaluation against infections caused by anaerobic gram-positive bacteria and corynebacteria.

• Copyright © 2003 American Society for Microbiology