Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mechanisms of Resistance

Haemophilus influenzae bla ROB-1 Mutations in Hypermutagenic ΔampC Escherichia coli Conferring Resistance to Cefotaxime and β-Lactamase Inhibitors and Increased Susceptibility to Cefaclor

Juan-Carlos Galán, María-Isabel Morosini, María-Rosario Baquero, Milagro Reig, Fernando Baquero
Juan-Carlos Galán
Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jgalanm.hrc@salud.madrid.org
María-Isabel Morosini
Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
María-Rosario Baquero
Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Milagro Reig
Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fernando Baquero
Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.8.2551-2557.2003
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The clinical use of cefaclor has been shown to enrich Haemophilus influenzae populations harboring cefaclor-hydrolyzing ROB-1 β-lactamase. Such a selective process may lead to the increased use of extended-spectrum cephalosporins or β-lactams plus β-lactamase inhibitors and, eventually, resistance to these agents, which has not previously been observed in H. influenzae. In order to establish which blaROB-1 mutations, if any, could confer resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins and/or to β-lactamase inhibitors, a plasmid harboring blaROB-1 was transformed into hypermutagenic strain Escherichia coli GB20 (ΔampC mutS::Tn10), and this construct was used in place of H. influenzae blaROB-1. Strain GB20 with the cloned gene was submitted to serial passages in tubes containing broth with increasing concentrations of selected β-lactams (cefotaxime or amoxicillin-clavulanate). Different mutations in the blaROB-1 gene were obtained during the passages in the presence of the different concentrations of the selective agents. Mutants resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins harbored either the Leu169→Ser169 or the Arg164→Trp164 substitution or the double amino acid change Arg164→Trp164 and Ala237→Thr237. ROB-1 mutants that were resistant to β-lactams plus β-lactamase inhibitors and that harbored the Arg244→Cys244 or the Ser130→Gly130 replacement were also obtained. The cefaclor-hydrolyzing efficiencies of the ROB-1 variants were strongly decreased in all mutants, suggesting that if blaROB-1 mutants were selected by cefaclor, this drug would prevent the further evolution of this β-lactamase toward molecular forms able to resist extended-spectrum cephalosporins or β-lactamase inhibitors.

The introduction of conjugate vaccines effective against Haemophilus influenzae type b has influenced both the prevalence of infections caused by this respiratory pathogen (50) and the rates of antibiotic resistance. Nevertheless, H. influenzae is still an important causative agent of acute otitis media, pneumonia, and chronic bronchitis. Different surveillance programs have pointed out the constant increase in the proportions of ampicillin-resistant H. influenzae strains due to β-lactamase production from the mid-1970s to the end of the 1990s (14, 19, 35, 42), when the frequency of β-lactamase-producing strains reached 30 to 35% in countries such as the United States and Spain (2, 13, 15, 43, 44). In the postvaccination era, ampicillin resistance has dropped to apparently stable levels of 20 to 25% in the United States and 10 to 15% in Spain (18). Only two β-lactamases have been identified in H. influenzae, TEM-1 and ROB-1. The simultaneous presence of both of these enzymes in the same strain is extremely unusual (they are both found in about 0.5% of β-lactamase-positive strains) (36). The global prevalence of H. influenzae harboring ROB-1 is 7 to 11% among β-lactamase-producing isolates (12, 21, 26, 36). This enzyme has a particularly high level of hydrolytic activity against cefaclor, and about 70% of cefaclor-resistant H. influenzae strains are ROB-1 producers (21). High levels of consumption of this drug in the United States and Mexico may explain the high local prevalence of ROB-1 among β-lactamase-producing strains in both countries (21 and 26%, respectively) (D. J. Farrel, I. Morrissey, S. Bakker, E. Winsor, and D. Felmingham, Abstr. 42nd Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. C2-1888, 2002). ROB-1 also hydrolyzes cefprozil, but it does not affect the oxyimino-cephalosporins (ceftriaxone or cefotaxime) and is effectively inhibited by β-lactamase inhibitors, such as clavulanate (8). The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible risk of emergence of ROB-1 molecular variants able to hydrolyze oxyimino-cephalosporins such as ceftriaxone or cefotaxime or to develop resistance to β-lactamase inhibitors. For this purpose, we used a novel approach, cloning of the blaROB-1 gene from H. influenzae in an engineered Escherichia coli hypermutable strain (GB20) lacking the ampC gene encoding chromosomal β-lactamase. Hypermutation increases the rate of emergence of possible β-lactamase mutants, and the lack of the ampC gene ensures that these resistance mutations do not occur in the chromosomal β-lactamase gene but in blaROB-1.

(This work was presented in part at the 41st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Chicago, Ill., 2001 [J. C. Galán, M. R. Baquero, and F. Baquero, Abstr. 41st Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. C1-1490, 2001].)

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and GB20 construction. E. coli MI1443 (11) was used as the recipient for plasmids and for the determination of antibiotic susceptibilities. Phage P1 was grown on hypermutable E. coli strain AB1157 mutS::Tn10 with a defective mutS gene (32). Recovered phage P1 was then used to transduce E. coli MI1443 with a defective ampC gene, giving rise to E. coli GB20. Detailed descriptions of the strains are provided in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

Plasmids.Plasmid pMON401 (Ampr Chlr) harboring the blaROB-1 gene (20) is a pACYC184 (Tetr Chlr) derivative (9). Plasmids pMON410, pMON411, pMON420, pMON421, and pMON422 are pMON401 derivatives obtained in different serial passage experiments in this work. Plasmid pBGS18− (Kanr) (39) was used in subcloning experiments, giving rise to recombinant plasmids pBB1 (wild-type blaROB-1 gene); pBB10 and pBB11, which carry mutations in the blaROB-1 gene that confer resistance to β-lactam plus β-lactamase inhibitor combinations; as well as pBB20, pBB21, and pBB22, which have mutations that lead to increased cefotaxime-hydrolyzing activity. Plasmid pBB120 harbors the blaROB-1 gene with the changes that confer both clavulanate and cefotaxime resistance. Detailed descriptions of the plasmids are included in Table 1.

Determination of mutation frequencies.To ascertain the hypermutable nature of the E. coli GB20 construction, 50 μl of a 10−4 dilution of overnight cultures of each of the strains MI1443, GB20 (with and without pMON401), and AB1157 mutS::Tn10 was inoculated into five independent flasks containing Luria-Bertani (LB) broth; and the flasks were incubated overnight at 37°C under high agitation. A total of 100 μl of each overnight culture was plated onto LB agar plates containing 100 μg of rifampin per ml or 40 μg of nalidixic acid per ml. Simultaneously, 100 μl of a 10−6 dilution of each of the same cultures was plated on LB agar plates without antibiotics. The number of rifampin-resistant or nalidixic acid-resistant mutants was counted at 48 h, and the number of viable cells was counted at 24 h. The mutation frequency was defined as the ratio of rifampin- or nalidixic acid-resistant colonies versus the number of viable cells in antibiotic-free medium.

Serial passage experiments.Aliquots (5 μl) of an overnight culture of E. coli GB20(pMON401) were inoculated into five tubes containing 5 ml of LB broth with tetracycline (20 μg/ml) and chloramphenicol (30 μg/ml) to ensure the maintenance of Tn10 and pMON401, respectively. The cultures were grown at 37°C under normal agitation and were submitted to daily serial passages with increasing concentrations of cefotaxime alone or amoxicillin plus a fixed concentration of a β-lactamase inhibitor (2 μg of clavulanate per ml). The β-lactam concentrations ranged from 2 dilutions below to 6 dilutions above the MIC for GB20(pMON401). Plasmid DNA was extracted from each of the five bacterial populations that grew at 4 to 5 and 6 dilutions above the MIC of cefotaxime or 4 to 5 dilutions above the MIC of amoxicillin-clavulanate. DNA was introduced into MI1443 by transformation; transformants were selected on LB agar plates containing chloramphenicol (30 μg/ml) and cefotaxime or amoxicillin-clavulanate at 2, 3, or 4 dilutions above the MIC. Ten transformants from each population were chosen; and different phenotypes were identified by disk diffusion tests with cephalothin, cefazolin, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ampicillin, and amoxicillin-clavulanate. The plasmid DNA of transformants corresponding to each phenotype was reintroduced by transformation into MI1443, with only chloramphenicol used as a selector. The DNA of derivatives of strain MI1443(pMON401) with possible blaROB-1 gene variants was sequenced. Finally, each blaROB-1 gene variant was subcloned into plasmid pBGS18− to ascertain the specificities of the phenotypic changes independently from the host plasmid.

Construction of plasmids pBB1, pBB10, pBB20, and pBB120.To avoid the possible interference of putative mutations in the bacterial resistance phenotype that could arise in other sites of plasmid pMON401 during serial passage experiments, the blaROB-1 gene was amplified from plasmids pMON401, pMON410, pMON411, pMON420, pMON421, and pMON422 by PCR and subcloned into pBGS18−, giving rise to recombinant plasmids pBB1, pBB10, pBB11, pBB20, pBB21, and pBB22, respectively. Plasmid pBB120 was constructed as described below.

Susceptibility testing.The MICs of amoxicillin, ampicillin, piperacillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate (2:1 ratio), ampicillin-sulbactam (2:1 ratio), piperacillin-tazobactam (fixed concentration of tazobactam, 4 μg/ml), cephalothin, cefuroxime, cefaclor, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and imipenem were determined as recommended by the NCCLS (27).

Amplification and sequencing procedures.The primers used to amplify the blaROB-1 gene were ROBFE (5′-GGGGAATTCGATCAGAGTAATAATTTCTGAT-3′), which recognizes a region immediately upstream of the −35 region of the putative promoter, and ROBRH (5′-CGGCAAGCTTGAAAGCAAGTTTCAACGGCTT-3′), which hybridizes to a region 42 bp downstream of the stop codon containing an EcoRI and a HindIII restriction site (the respective restriction sites are underlined). The internal primers used to sequence the gene in both directions were ROBd1 (5′-CGTTTATGTATGGGATACAGAA-3′), which hybridizes to a region 185 bp from the beginning of the gene, and ROBr (5′-GGGTTACGTTATCGCCTAATT-3′), which hybridizes to a region 390 bp from the end of the gene. Amplification was performed in a mixture containing (per 50 μl) 2 mM MgCl2, 1× PCR buffer II (Applied Biosystems, Weiterstadt, Germany), 200 μM (each) deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 25 pmol of each primer, and 2.5 U of Taq-Gold DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems). The following PCR program was used: 94°C for 12 min and 35 amplification cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 60 s, annealing at 56°C for 60 s, and elongation at 72°C for 60 s. The amplification product was analyzed by electrophoresis on a 0.8% agarose gel predyed with ethidium bromide. The primers were removed from the PCR product with the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, GmbH, Hilden, Germany) before the product was sequenced or cloned into a new plasmid.

Construction of β-lactamases with triple mutations.The enzyme with the triple mutation Ser130Gly, Arg164Trp, and Ala237Thr was constructed by using the new primers ROBArg164Trp (5′-CTAGCCA∗ATTGGTATGGGTT-3′), which harbors the mutation G532→A532 (asterisk) and which results in the Arg164Trp substitution, and ROBd2 (5′-TTGGCAAAGGCATGACGATTG-3′), which hybridizes to nucleotide positions 380 to 400 in the blaROB-1 gene, together with primers ROBFE and ROBRH described above. A first PCR was performed with primers ROBFE and ROBArg164Trp by using DNA from the amoxicillin-clavulanate-resistant mutant as the template. A second PCR was performed with primers ROBd2 and ROBRH by using DNA from the cefotaxime-resistant mutant. A third PCR was carried out with primers ROBFE and ROBRH by using the PCR products obtained in the previous amplifications as the templates. The final amplification product was digested with EcoRI and HindIII, ligated to pBGS18−, digested with the same restriction enzymes, and transformed into MI1443. Transformants were selected on LB agar plates containing kanamycin (50 μg/ml), and the blaROB gene of recombinant plasmid pBB120 was sequenced to confirm the presence of the three desired changes.

Enzyme kinetics.The β-lactamases extracted from E. coli MI1443(pBB1), MI1443(pBB10), MI1443(pBB11), MI1443(pBB20), MI1443(pBB21), and MI1443(pBB22) were prepared from 1 liter of an overnight culture of LB broth with kanamycin (50 μg/ml) at 37°C. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4,500 × g for 20 min, washed twice with 5 ml of 0.05 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), and resuspended in 2 ml of the same buffer. The suspension was sonicated for 10 min with 2-s pulses (Sonicator Heat system; Ultrasonics Inc.). Debris was removed by centrifugation (17,500 × g for 30 min at 4°C), and the β-lactamase activity of the supernatant was assayed by nitrocefin hydrolysis.

The β-lactamase activities of the extracts against different β-lactam antibiotics were measured spectrophotometrically (Uvikon-940 spectrophotometer). Km and Vmax values were obtained by double-reciprocal (Lineweaver-Burk) plots of the initial steady-state rates at different substrate concentrations. The inhibitor concentrations required to inhibit 50% of the β-lactamase activity (IC50s) were determined by incubating the β-lactamase extracts with different concentrations of the inhibitors for 10 min at room temperature, and then 100 μM nitrocefin was added as the substrate (5).

RESULTS

Mutation frequency of constructed strain E. coli GB20.The mutation frequency of the constructed variant, E. coli GB20 (ΔampC, mutS defective), was compared with those of its isogenic strain, E. coli MI1443 (ΔampC), and strain E. coli AB1157 mutS::Tn10. The frequencies of mutation to rifampin (100 μg/ml) and nalidixic acid (40 μg/ml) resistance for E. coli GB20 were 2.7 ± 0.9 × 10−7 and 5.5 ± 3.2 × 10−7, respectively. Identical values were also obtained when the strain harbored plasmid pMON401 (data not shown). These mutation frequency values are similar to those for E. coli AB1157 mutS::Tn10 strain from which the mutS allele was derived, which were 4.5 ± 1.4 × 10−7 and 2.6 ± 0.5 × 10−7, respectively. For wild-type strain E. coli MI1443, the mutation frequencies were 2.6 ± 3.3 × 10−9 and 5.7 ± 2.9 × 10−9, respectively. These results showed that the mutation frequency for E. coli GB20 was 100-fold higher than that for its isogenic strain, E. coli MI1443. These results, which reflect the means of five replicate experiments in each case, coincided with those expected for hypermutable strains with a defective mutS gene (25).

Serial passage experiments.The original cefotaxime MIC for E. coli GB20(pMON401) was 0.06 μg/ml. After a week of daily passages with increasing cefotaxime concentrations, the strain was able to grow in the presence of cefotaxime at a concentration of up to 4 μg/ml. Transformants obtained from populations growing in five different tubes containing 2 or 4 μg of cefotaxime per ml exhibited a single phenotypic pattern of antibiotic resistance. Conversely, transformants from populations recovered from tubes containing only 1 μg of cefotaxime per ml yielded two different phenotypic patterns. This observation suggests that different cefotaxime-resistant mutational variants were selected in the presence of low antibiotic concentrations but were replaced by a more effective mutant in the presence of higher concentrations.

The original amoxicillin-clavulanate MIC for E. coli GB20 was 4/2 μg/ml, and after serial passages, growth was obtained in the presence of 64/2 μg/ml. Transformants obtained from all tubes containing this highly resistant population had a single phenotypic pattern of resistance. As in the case of cefotaxime, when transformants were obtained from cultures growing in tubes with only 16/2 μg of amoxicillin-clavulanate per ml, three different phenotypic patterns of antibiotic resistance were found. Again, the interpretation is that mutational variants were selected at low amoxicillin-clavulanate concentrations; however, only the more effective mutant (that with the “winner” genotype) was able to survive in the presence of the higher concentration.

Genetic characterization of mutants.Both strands of the blaROB-1 gene from E. coli strains that achieved the highest levels of amoxicillin-clavulanate or cefotaxime resistance after antibiotic challenge were fully sequenced. The mutations found are shown in Table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Mutants of ROB-1 β-lactamase conferring resistance to cefotaxime and/or amoxicillin-clavulanate

Three types of mutant variants were obtained in the cefotaxime challenge experiments. Mutant ES1 was the only transformant found in all five tubes with the highest cefotaxime concentration. This variant showed two nucleotide substitutions, C436→T436 and G656→A656, resulting in the amino acid substitutions Arg164Trp (near the Ω loop) and Ala237Thr (next to the KSG motif, according to the numbering scheme of Ambler et al. [1]). Other extended-spectrum ROB (ES-ROB) variants were found only in the presence of lower cefotaxime concentrations. One of the mutants had the single mutation C436→T436, which gave rise to the Arg164Trp substitution; and the other mutant had the single change T452→C452, which resulted in the amino acid substitution Leu169Ser.

Two types of resistant mutants were detected in the amoxicillin-clavulanate challenge experiments. In the case of transformants from five of five tubes growing in the presence of high amoxicillin-clavulanate concentrations, a single type of inhibitor-resistant ROB (IR-ROB) mutant was detected. The mutant had the single mutation A335→G335, which results in the amino acid change Ser130Gly, located in the SDN motif of the β-lactamase molecule. A second type of IR-ROB mutant was detectable only among transformants growing in some tubes with low amoxicillin-clavulanate concentrations. That mutant had a single mutation, C674→T674, that conferred the amino acid change Arg244Cys.

Antibiotic susceptibilities of E. coli MI1443 containing pBB1 pBB10, pBB11, pBB20, pBB21, pBB22, and pBB120 recombinant plasmids.The MICs of the different β-lactam antibiotics for E. coli MI1443 harboring plasmid pBGS18− and the recombinant plasmids (pBGS18− derivatives with the blaROB variants) are shown in Table 3.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Susceptibilities to β-lactams of E. coli MI1443 and derivatives producing wild-type ROB-1 and mutant ROB-1 β-lactamases

The E. coli strain with pBB20, which harbors the ES-ROB mutant enzyme with the substitutions Arg164Trp and Ala237Thr (the winner genotype in cefotaxime challenge experiments), had increased levels of resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins, ranging from 16-fold increased levels of resistance to ceftazidime to about 60-fold increased levels of resistance to cefotaxime, the selector antibiotic. However, this mutant was more susceptible to penicillins and, surprisingly, to cefaclor (16-fold) than the E. coli strain harboring the wild-type enzyme. The E. coli strain with pBB21, which carries Arg164Trp as the sole change, was 16 times more resistant to ceftazidime and cefotaxime than the E. coli strain harboring the wild-type enzyme; and the level of resistance of the E. coli strain with pBB21 to cefaclor was reduced 256-fold. For the E. coli strain with pBB22 (Leu169Ser), the ceftazidime MIC increased eightfold and the cefotaxime MIC increased fourfold, while the cefaclor MIC decreased eightfold.

The E. coli strain with pBB10, which harbors the IR-ROB enzyme with the Ser130Gly replacement (the winner genotype in amoxicillin-clavulanate challenge experiments), was eightfold more resistant to β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations than the E. coli strain with pBB1 and the wild-type enzyme. Interestingly, the susceptibilities to all cephalosporins tested increased, particularly that to cefaclor (≥1,024-fold). In the case of the E. coli strain with pBB11, which harbors the second IR-ROB variant with the Arg244Cys amino acid change, the level of resistance to the inhibitors increased 4-fold, but again, the level of resistance to cefaclor decreased dramatically (≥1,024-fold).

The E. coli strain with the hybrid mutant enzyme (IR-ES-ROB) showed a phenotype of reduced levels of resistance to both amoxicillin-clavulanate (8 μg/ml, versus 4 μg/ml for the wild type) and ceftazidime (32 μg/ml, versus 8 μg/ml for the wild type). Other investigators have observed this trend with other β-lactamases (34, 40), once more revealing the difficulty in obtaining both resistance phenotypes in the same enzyme molecule.

Kinetic parameters.The kinetics of substrate hydrolysis by the ROB-1 β-lactamase in comparison with those by the ROB-1 mutants with a single mutation (IR-ROB or ES-ROB) or double mutations (mutant ES1) are shown in Table 4. With respect to cefotaxime, the catalytic efficiencies (Vmax/Km values) of the β-lactamases of the ES-ROB mutants with the single Leu169Ser or Arg164Trp change or the double Ala237Thr and Arg164Trp changes were 3.5, 5.5, and 1,000 times higher, respectively, than that of the ROB-1 β-lactamase. On the contrary, the catalytic efficiency toward cefaclor in these mutants was decreased 3, 17, and 6 times, respectively. The catalytic efficiency of the β-lactamase of the more efficient mutant (with double Ala237Thr and Arg164Trp mutations) toward ampicillin was reduced 27.5-fold.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4.

Kinetics parameters for ROB-1 β-lactamase and mutant derivativesa

The catalytic efficiencies (Vmax/Km values) of the IR-ROB β-lactamases with the Ser130Gly and the Arg244Cys changes toward cefaclor were reduced 23 and 95 times, respectively, in comparison with that of the wild-type enzyme. The catalytic efficiency toward ampicillin was also reduced 6.5-fold.

Activities of β-lactam inhibitors against ROB-1 β-lactamase variants.The IC50s of clavulanate, sulbactam, and tazobactam for the wild-type ROB-1 β-lactamase and the different ROB-1 variants are shown in Table 5. The IC50s of tazobactam for the variants compared with that for the wild-type enzyme increased the least: 70-fold for the ROB-1 variant carrying the Ser130Gly change and only 1.5-fold for the mutant with the Arg244Cys substitution. The IC50s of clavulanate, sulbactam, and tazobactam increased the least for the ES-ROB mutant with the double Arg164Trp and Ala237Thr mutations, with the IC50s being 30, 8.5, and 60 times lower, respectively, than the IC50 for ROB-1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 5.

β-Lactamase inhibitor IC50s for ROB-1 β-lactamase and ROB-1 mutant enzymes

DISCUSSION

Several methods for prediction of the evolution of an enzyme that increases the catalytic activity toward its substrate have been described (22, 41, 47, 49). It is expected that in vitro evolution models could yield the same mutants as in vivo processes of evolution (3, 17). In this sense, the use of hypermutable strains is a good means of prediction of natural evolution (30; A. J. O'Neill, I. Chopra, J. L. Martínez, and F. Baquero, Letter, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1599-1600, 2001). Nevertheless, the use of E. coli mutant strains for prediction of the evolution of plasmid-mediated β-lactamases has been hindered by the frequent emergence of chromosomal mutants, particularly those involving the AmpC β-lactamase (22). Host strain E. coli GB20 (ΔampC) was used in this work to overcome this problem, and use of this strain can be recommended for prediction by simple serial challenge procedures of a number of mutations in β-lactamases leading to the extension of the hydrolytic spectrum, including β-lactams and β-lactamase inhibitors.

In this study, different resistance genotypes were obtained in the presence of low antibiotic concentrations, but a single genotype was recovered in each experiment in the presence of the highest antibiotic concentration. This result supports the hypothesis that the variability of resistant mutants may be higher in the presence of lower antibiotic concentrations (23). This, in fact, is what is suggested by experiments for the concentration-dependent selection of mutants (28). Beyond a critical concentration, the allele that conferred the greatest fitness advantage eliminated all others (clonal displacement) (3). Our results indicate the need for exploration for the presence of mutants in the presence of low antibiotic concentrations, as some of them will be impossible to detect in the presence of higher ones.

The substitutions most frequently observed among TEM-derived extended-spectrum β-lactamases occur at position Arg164 and imply the presence of smaller amino acids in both TEM laboratory-derived mutants (Ser, Gly, Asn, Cys) and clinical isolates (Ser, Hys, Cys) (31, 48; http://www.lahey.org ). In the case of the laboratory-derived ROB-1 variants obtained in this study, Arg164 was replaced by the larger molecule Trp. Vakulenko et al. (48) have described that the mutant enzyme with the Arg164Trp change is responsible for the same cefotaxime or cefepime MICs as those for the wild-type enzyme but that the change drastically increases the susceptibility to ampicillin. The same substitution in ROB-1 increased the MIC for extended-spectrum β-lactams when a single mutation or double mutations were present (16- and 60-fold, respectively). This fact suggests that both the TEM-1 and the ROB-1 enzymes have different structures around the active site, which may reflect the distant phylogenetic relationship between them (24).

The second substitution observed in the ES-ROB winner genotype, Ala237Thr, is frequently found in TEM variants able to hydrolyze cefotaxime or ceftazidime (TEM-5 or TEM-24). Nevertheless, this change does not increase the level of resistance to β-lactams in the absence of other mutations and has been considered a resistance modulator (6). A third ES-ROB mutant carried the single substitution Leu169Ser. Replacements at this position have been already studied in TEM-1 by random mutagenesis or the DNA shuffling technique, with increased activity against ceftazidime being detected (31, 46).

A single nucleotide change in the blaROB-1 gene, A335→G, which leads to the amino acid substitution Ser130Gly in the conservative domain SDN (7), confers a fourfold increase in the level of resistance to β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. This substitution has previously been described in several β-lactamases such as IRT-17 (4), SHV-10 (33), OXY-2 (37), and ACI-1 variant (J. C. Galán, M. R. Baquero, M. Reig, F. Baquero, and J. Blázquez, Abstr. 40th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. 1919, 2000). The Arg244Cys variant with the IR-ROB phenotype has been described in TEM derivatives such as IRT-1, IRT-16, and IRT-18 (http://www.lahey.org ). These mutants, like the one obtained in this work, maintained their susceptibilities to tazobactam.

The hybrid IR-ES-ROB β-lactamase was constructed, and each mutation (Ser130Gly and Arg164Trp plus Ala237Thr) conferred the most efficient phenotype. This hybrid mutant showed weak activities against amoxicillin-clavulanate and ceftazidime and showed even weaker activities against ampicillin and cefotaxime. The possibility that this mutant could be selected in the clinical environment is low. It is known that, despite some exceptions (16, 29, 38), there is frequent incompatibility between the IR and ES phenotypes (34, 40).

Serial passage experiments with H. influenzae in the presence of amoxicillin-clavulanate apparently yielded a few variants for which the MIC was increased, but the increase was not more than fourfold and the variants were not analyzed further (10). It is noteworthy that inhibitor-resistant β-lactamases or extended-spectrum β-lactamases have never been reported in H. influenzae. It is also noteworthy that when extended-spectrum β-lactamases were introduced into H. influenzae, the strains remained susceptible, according to NCCLS criteria, while the MICs for the strains increased significantly (45).

The emergence in H. influenzae of resistant ES-ROB or IR-ROB enzymes could cause important clinical problems. When E. coli was used as the host for these enzymes, the cefotaxime and amoxicillin-clavulanate MICs increased 128 and 64 times, respectively. Considering that similar increases may occur in a typical H. influenzae strain for which basal cefotaxime and amoxicillin-clavulanate MICs are 0.03 and 0.5 μg/ml, respectively, the MIC of cefotaxime could reach 4 μg/ml and that of amoxicillin-clavulanate could reach 32 μg/ml. Interestingly, in the IR-ROB and ES-ROB mutants obtained in this work, the susceptibility to cefaclor was increased significantly (1,024 times for IR-ROB and from 4 to 256 times for ES-ROB) with respect to that for the E. coli strain harboring the wild-type ROB-1 enzyme. The cefaclor MIC for a typical H. influenzae isolate with ROB-1 is 32 μg/ml, but those for strains harboring the IR-ROB mutants are expected to be less than 0.125 μg/ml and those for ES-ROB mutants are expected to range from 0.125 to 8 μg/ml. Although treatment with cefaclor could select for H. influenzae strains harboring the ROB-1 β-lactamase (21), the same antibiotic could have prevented the evolution of this enzyme to IR-ROB or ES-ROB enzymatic variants.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

E. coli(pMON401) was kindly provided by A. Medeiros.

This work was supported in part by European Project QLK2-CT-2001-00873 and REIPI C03/14. Juan-Carlos Galán was a recipient of a fellowship (BEFI 98/9060) from the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias de la Seguridad Social of Spain.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 17 January 2003.
    • Returned for modification 25 March 2003.
    • Accepted 17 May 2003.
  • Copyright © 2003 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Ambler, R. P., F. W. Coulson, J. M. Frère, J. M. Ghuysen, B. Joris, M. Forsman, R. C. Levesque, G. Tyraby, and S. G. Waley. 1991. A standard numbering scheme for class A β-lactamases. Biochem. J.276:269-272.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Baquero, F., R. Cantón, and F. Baquero-Artigao. 1997. Current patterns and evolution of antibiotic resistance among bacterial pathogens involved in acute otitis media. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.3(Suppl. 3):S26-S33.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    Barlow, M., and B. G. Hall. 2002. Predicting evolutionary potential: in vitro evolution accurately reproduces natural evolution of the TEM β-lactamase. Genetics160:823-832.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Bermudes, H., F. Jude, E. B. Chaïbi, C. Arpin, C. Bebear, R. Labia, and C. Quentin. 1999. Molecular characterization of TEM-59 (IRT-17), a novel inhibitor-resistant TEM-derived β-lactamase in a clinical isolate of Klebsiella oxytoca.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.43:1657-1661.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Blázquez, J., M. R. Baquero, R. Cantón, I. Alós, and F. Baquero. 1993. Characterization of the new TEM-type β-lactamase resistant to clavulanate, sulbactam, and tazobactam in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.33:2059-2063.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    Blázquez, J., M. C. Negri, M. I. Morosini, J. M. Gómez-Gómez, and F. Baquero. 1998. A237T as a modulating mutation in naturally occurring extended-spectrum TEM-type β-lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.42:1042-1044.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Brown, R. P., R. T. Aplin, and C. J. Schofield. 1996. Inhibition of TEM-2 β-lactamase from Escherichia coli by clavulanic acid: observation of intermediates by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Biochemistry35:12421-12432.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Bush, K., G. A. Jacoby, and A. A. Medeiros. 1995. A functional classification scheme for β-lactamases and its correlation with molecular structure. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.39:1211-1233.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Chang, A. C. Y., and S. N. Cohen. 1978. Construction and characterization of amplifiable multicopy DNA cloning vehicles derived from the P15A cryptic miniplasmid. J. Bacteriol.134:1141-1156.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Clark, C., B. Bozdogan, M. Peric, B. Dewasse, M. R. Jacobs, and P. C. Appelbaum. 2002. In vitro selection of resistance in Haemophilus influenzae by amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefpodoxime, cefprozil, azithromycin, and clarithromycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.46:2956-2962.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Condon, C., and J. H. Weiner. 1988. Fumarate reductase of Escherichia coli: an investigation of function and assembly using in vivo complementation. Mol. Microbiol.2:43-52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Daum, R. S., M. Murphey-Corb, E. Shapira, and S. Dipp. 1988. Epidemiology of ROB β-lactamase among ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae isolated in the United States. J. Infect. Dis.157:450-455.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Doern, G., R. N. Jones, M. A. Pfaller, K. Kugler, and the SENTRY Participants Group. 1999. Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis from patients with community-acquired respiratory tract infections: antimicrobial susceptibility patterns from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (United States and Canada, 1997). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.43:385-389.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Doern, G. V., et al. 1996. Antimicrobial resistance among lower respiratory tract isolates of Haemophilus influenzae: results of a 1992-93 Western Europe and USA collaborative surveillance study. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.38(Suppl. A):59-69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Felmingham, D., and R. N. Gruneberg. 2000. The Alexander Project 1996-1997: latest susceptibility data from this international study of bacterial pathogens from community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.45:191-203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Fiett, J., A. Palucha, B. Miaczynska, M. Stankiewicz, H. Przondo-Mordarska, W. Hryniewicz, and M. Gniadkowski. 2000. A novel complex mutant β-lactamase, TEM-68, identified in a Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate from an outbreak of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing klebsiellae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.44:1499-1505.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Hall, B. G. 2002. Predicting evolution by in vitro evolution requires determining evolutionary pathways. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.46:3035-3038.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Hoban, D., and D. Felmingham. 2002. The PROTEKT surveillance study: antimicrobial susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis from community-acquired respiratory tract infections. J. Antimicrob. Agents50(Suppl. S1):49-59.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    Howard, A. J., C. J. Hince, and J. D. Williams. 1978. Antibiotic resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae. Report of a study group on bacterial resistance. Br. Med. J. i:1657-1660.
  20. 20.↵
    Juteau, J. M., and R. C. Levesque. 1990. Sequence analysis and evolutionary perspectives of ROB-1 β-lactamase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.34:1354-1359.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    Karlowsky, J. A., G. Verma, G. G. Zhanel, and D. J. Hoban. 2000. Presence of ROB-1 β-lactamase correlates with cefaclor resistance among recent isolates of Haemophilus influenzae.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.45:871-875.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Long-McGie, J., A. D. Liu, and V. Schellenberger. 2000. Rapid in vivo evolution of a β-lactamase using phagemids. Biotechnol. Bioeng.68:121-125.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Martínez, J. L., and F. Baquero. 2000. Mutation frequencies and antibiotic resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.44:1771-1777.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    Massova, I., and S. Mobashery. 1998. Kinship and diversification of bacterial penicillin-binding proteins and β-lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.42:1-17.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    Modrich, P. 1991. Mechanism and biological effects of mismatch repair. Annu. Rev. Genet.25:229-253.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    Molina, J. M., J. Córdoba, R. Esteban, B. Laínez, A. Monsoliu, V. Gregori, A. Hernandez, N. Diosdado, and M. Gobernado. 2002. Estudio de resistencia a β-lactámicos de Haemophilus influenzae conferida por el gen blaROB-1. Rev. Esp. Quimioter.15:148-151.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2000. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 5th ed. Approved standard M7-A5. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  28. 28.↵
    Negri, M. C., M. Lipsitch, J. Blázquez, B. R. Levin, and F. Baquero. 2000. Concentration-dependent selection of small phenotypic differences in TEM β-lactamase-mediated antibiotic resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.44:2485-2491.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    Neuwirth, C., S. Madec, E. Siebor, A. Pechinot, J. M. Duez, M. Pruneaux, M. Foucheareau-Peron, A. Kazmierczak, and R. Labia. 2001. TEM-89 β-lactamase produced by a Proteus mirabilis clinical isolate: new complex mutant (CMT-3) with mutations of both TEM-59 (IRT-17) and TEM-3. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.45:3591-3594.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    Orencia, M. C., J. S. Yoon, J. E. Ness, W. P. Stemmer, and R. C. Stevens. 2001. Predicting the emergence of antibiotic resistance by directed evolution and structural analysis. Nat. Struct. Biol.8:238-242.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    Palzkill, T., Q. Q. Le, K. V. Venkatachalam, M. LaRocco, and H. Ocera. 1994. Evolution of antibiotic resistance: several different amino acid substitutions in an active site loop alter the substrate profile of β-lactamase. Mol. Microbiol.12:217-229.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    Pang, P. P., A. S. Lundberg, and G. C. Walker. 1985. Identification and characterization of the mutL and mutS gene products of Salmonella typhimurium.J. Bacteriol.163:1007-1015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    Prinarakis, E. E., V. Miriagou, E. Tzelepi, M. Gazouli, and L. S. Tzouvelekis. 1997. Emergence of an inhibitor-resistant β-lactamase (SHV-10) derived from an SHV-5 variant. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.41:838-840.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    Randegger, C. C., and H. Hächler. 2001. Amino acid substitutions causing inhibitor resistance in TEM β-lactamases compromise the extended-spectrum phenotype in SHV extended-spectrum β-lactamases. J. Antimicrob. Agents47:547-554.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    Schito, G. C., E. A. Debbia, and A. Marchese. 2000. The evolving threat of antibiotic resistance in Europe: new data from the Alexander Project. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.46(Suppl. T1):3-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    Scriver, S. R., S. L. Walmsley, C. L. Kau, D. L. Hoban, J. Brunton, A. McGeer, T. C. Moore, E. Witwicki, Canadian Haemophilus Study Group, and D. E. Low. 1994. Determination of antimicrobial susceptibilities of Canadian isolates of Haemophilus influenzae and characterization of their β-lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.38:1678-1680.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    Sirot, D., R. Labia, P. Pouedras, C. Chanal-Claris, C. Cerceau, and J. Sirot. 1998. Inhibitor-resistant OXY-2-derived β-lactamase produced by Klebsiella oxytoca.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.42:2184-2187.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    Sirot, D., C. Recule, E. B. Chaïbi, L. Bret, J. Croizé, C. Chanal-Claris, R. Labia, and J. Sirot. 1997. A complex mutant of TEM-1 β-lactamase with mutations encountered in both IRT-4 and extended-spectrum TEM-15 produced by an Escherichia coli clinical isolate. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.41:1322-1325.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    Spratt, B. G., P. J. Hedge, S. T. Heesen, A. Edelman, and J. K. Broome-Smith. 1986. Kanamycin-resistant vectors that are analogues of plasmids pUC8, pUC9, pEMBL8 and pEMBL9. Gene41:337-342.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    Stapleton, P. D., K. P. Shannon, and G. L. French. 1999. Construction and characterization of mutants of the TEM-1 β-lactamase containing amino acid substitutions associated with both extended-spectrum resistance and resistance to β-lactamase inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.43:1881-1887.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    Stemmer, W. P. C. 1994. Rapid evolution of a protein in vivo by DNA shuffling. Nature370:389-391.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    Syriopoulou, V., D. Scheifele, V. Howie, J. Ploussard, J. Sloyer, and A. L. Smith. 1976. Incidence of ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae in otitis media. J. Pediatr.89:839-841.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    Thornsberry, C., M. E. Jones, M. L. Hickey, Y. Mauriz, J. Kahn, and D. F. Sahm. 1999. Resistance surveillance of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis isolated in the United States, 1997-1998. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.44:749-759.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    Thornsberry, C., P. Ogilvie, J. Kahn, Y. Mauriz, et al. 1997. Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae,Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis in the United States in 1996-1997 respiratory season. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.29:249-257.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    Tristram, S. G. 2003. Effect of extended-spectrum β-lactamases on the susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to cephalosporins. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.51:39-43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. 46.↵
    Vakulenko, S., and D. Golemi. 2002. Mutant TEM β-lactamase producing resistance to ceftazidime, ampicillins, and β-lactamase inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.46:646-653.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    Vakulenko, S. B., B. Geryk, P. K. Lakshmi, S. Mobashery, and S. A. Lerner. 1998. Selection and characterization of β-lactam-β-lactamase inactivator- resistant mutants following PCR mutagenesis of the TEM-1 β-lactamase gene. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.42:1542-1548.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    Vakulenko, S. B., P. Taibi-Tronche, M. Tóth, I. Massova, S. A. Lerner, and S. Mobashery. 1999. Effects on substrate profile by mutational substitutions at positions 164 and 179 of the class A TEM pUC19 β-lactamase from Escherichia coli.J. Biol. Chem.274:23052-23060.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    Zaccolo, M., and E. Gherardi. 1999. The effect of high-frequency random mutagenesis on in vitro protein evolution: a study on TEM-1 β-lactamase. J. Mol. Biol.285:775-783.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. 50.↵
    Zhou, F., K. M. Bisgard, H. R. Yusuf, R. R. Deuson, S. K. Bath, and T. V. Murphy. 2002. Impact of universal Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccination starting at 2 months of age in the United States: an economic analysis. Pediatrics110:653-661.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Haemophilus influenzae bla ROB-1 Mutations in Hypermutagenic ΔampC Escherichia coli Conferring Resistance to Cefotaxime and β-Lactamase Inhibitors and Increased Susceptibility to Cefaclor
Juan-Carlos Galán, María-Isabel Morosini, María-Rosario Baquero, Milagro Reig, Fernando Baquero
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jul 2003, 47 (8) 2551-2557; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.8.2551-2557.2003

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Haemophilus influenzae bla ROB-1 Mutations in Hypermutagenic ΔampC Escherichia coli Conferring Resistance to Cefotaxime and β-Lactamase Inhibitors and Increased Susceptibility to Cefaclor
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Haemophilus influenzae bla ROB-1 Mutations in Hypermutagenic ΔampC Escherichia coli Conferring Resistance to Cefotaxime and β-Lactamase Inhibitors and Increased Susceptibility to Cefaclor
Juan-Carlos Galán, María-Isabel Morosini, María-Rosario Baquero, Milagro Reig, Fernando Baquero
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jul 2003, 47 (8) 2551-2557; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.8.2551-2557.2003
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacterial Proteins
Cefaclor
cefotaxime
cephalosporins
Enzyme Inhibitors
Escherichia coli
Haemophilus influenzae
mutation
beta-lactamase inhibitors
beta-lactamases

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596