Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mechanisms of Resistance

β-Lactamase Gene Expression in a Penicillin-Resistant Bacillus anthracis Strain

Yahua Chen, Fred C. Tenover, Theresa M. Koehler
Yahua Chen
1Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, The University of Texas—Houston Health Science Center Medical School, Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fred C. Tenover
2Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Theresa M. Koehler
1Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, The University of Texas—Houston Health Science Center Medical School, Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: theresa.m.koehler@uth.tmc.edu
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4873-4877.2004
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Expression of the bla1 and bla2 genes in an archetypal Bacillus anthracis strain is insufficient for penicillin resistance. In a penicillin-resistant clinical isolate, both genes are highly transcribed, but bla1 is the major contributor to high-level resistance to ampicillin. Differential expression of the bla genes is dependent upon strain background.

Ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, and penicillin G are currently recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration as therapeutics for inhalation and cutaneous anthrax (16). Prototypical Bacillus anthracis strains are susceptible to all three of these antibiotics. There have been no reports of naturally occurring ciprofloxacin- or doxycycline-resistant B. anthracis strains, but naturally occurring penicillin-resistant B. anthracis isolates have been reported (5, 19, 20, 32), and surveys of clinical and soil-derived strains have revealed penicillin G resistance in up to 16% of isolates tested (3, 6, 8, 10, 21, 25, 26).

Bacterial resistance to β-lactam antibiotics is most commonly attributed to the synthesis of β-lactamases, which are enzymes that hydrolyze amides, amidines, and other carbon-nitrogen bonds in cyclic amides (29). The presence of two β-lactamase genes, bla1 and bla2, in the penicillin-susceptible Sterne strain of B. anthracis was reported previously (7). Sterne is a well-studied attenuated strain that serves as a live vaccine for animals (33). Sterne is toxigenic due to the presence of pXO1, which carries the toxin genes, but is capsule deficient because it lacks pXO2, which harbors the capsule biosynthesis genes (Table 1). With the exception of being pXO2 negative, Sterne is considered to be a prototypical B. anthracis strain (34). The bla genes of Sterne, located approximately 900 kb apart on the chromosome, encode functional β-lactamases. Escherichia coli clones containing either gene exhibit penicillinase activity. Bla1 appears to be a group 2a penicillinase. Bla2 is similar to a group 3 Bacillus cereus metalloenzyme (23). Nevertheless, the low level of bla gene expression in Sterne is insufficient for resistance to ampicillin (7, 23), and induction of β-lactamase activity has not been observed following growth in sublytic levels of penicillin G or cefoxitin (Y. Chen and T. M. Koehler, unpublished data).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Plasmids and strains used in this study

B. anthracis 32 is a highly β-lactamase-positive clinical isolate for which the penicillin MIC is between 64 and 128 μg/ml (21, 32). PCRs employing strain 32 DNA and oligonucleotide primers corresponding to bla1 and bla2 sequences from the penicillin-susceptible UM44 (Sterne) strain (Tables 1 and 2) resulted in amplicons of the expected sizes for the bla1 and bla2 genes (data not shown), indicating that strain 32 harbors both bla genes. Although all experiments described here were performed in facilities that met Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines, in the interest of maximum safety, we created a toxin-deficient derivative of strain 32 by curing it of pXO1 by culturing the strain in a medium containing a sublethal concentration of novobiocin (14). Results of PCR experiments testing for the presence of the toxin genes (17) and immunoblots testing for the presence of the anthrax toxin protein-protective antigen and lethal factor in culture supernates (15) revealed a cured strain, UT223, that was pXO1 negative and pXO2 positive (Table 1). UT223, like its parent, produced high-level β-lactamase activity and was able to grow in media containing ampicillin (100 μg/ml). Nucleotide sequences of amplified DNAs indicated that the coding sequence of bla1 from the β-lactamase-positive strain UT223 is identical to that of bla1 from UM44. The coding sequences of the bla2 genes from UT223 and UM44 differ by one nucleotide, which is predicted to result in a single-amino-acid substitution (Y62C). Both bla2 genes conferred ampicillin resistance to E. coli, indicating that the sequence difference does not dramatically affect protein function.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Primers used in this study

To compare levels of bla gene expression in the penicillin-resistant and -susceptible strains, RNA was isolated from UT223 and UM44 cultures grown to exponential phase and subjected to reverse transcription-PCR and Northern hybridization (7). Both bla genes were transcribed in UT223 but not in UM44 (Fig. 1A). Transcript sizes corresponded to gene lengths: 1.0 kb for bla1 and 0.8 kb for bla2 (Fig. 1B). Thus, the bla genes of UT223 are expressed as monocistronic transcripts.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

bla gene transcription in penicillin-resistant (Penr) and penicillin-susceptible (Pens) B. anthracis strains. Total RNA was extracted from B. anthracis strains during exponential growth in Luria-Bertani medium. (A) Reverse transcription-PCR analysis of bla transcripts. Lane M, molecular size markers. (B) Northern blot analysis of bla transcripts. Internal DNA probes for bla1 and bla2 were generated by using primers listed in Table 2. Sizes of transcripts are indicated.

The comparison of bla1 and bla2 upstream regions (up to 500 nucleotides [nt]) in UM44 and UT223 revealed differences at specific sites (Fig. 2A). However, the first 351 nt upstream of bla1 and the first 180 nt upstream of bla2 are identical in the two strains. To determine if differential expression of the bla genes was due to sequence differences in upstream regions, common regions were cloned adjacent to a promoterless lacZ gene in pUTE546 (Table 1 and Fig. 2A). The reporter constructs were electroporated into B. anthracis strains (18), and promoter activity of the transcriptional fusions was assessed by measuring β-galactosidase activity (7). UM44 harboring either pUTE547 (Pbla1-lacZ) or pUTE548 (Pbla2-lacZ) produced a low level of β-galactosidase activity (Fig. 2B). In contrast, the enzyme activity of UT223 harboring either Pbla1-lacZ or Pbla2-lacZ was 100- to 1,000-fold higher. Both transcriptional fusions were expressed throughout growth. The bla2 promoter was more strongly expressed (about fourfold) than the bla1 promoter. These data indicate that differential expression of the bla genes in UM44 and UT223 is dependent upon strain background rather than differences in the promoter regions of the genes.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Promoter activity of bla genes in Penr and PensB. anthracis strains. (A) Schematic representation of sequence differences in bla genes. Cloned DNA regions for lacZ fusions are indicated. Loci of nucleotide differences are shown as asterisks. (B) Promoter activities of bla genes in Penr (UT223) (filled symbols) and Pens (UM44) (open symbols) strains. Isolates harbored pUTE546 (vector), pUTE547 (Pbla1), or pUTE548 (Pbla2) as indicated. β-Galactosidase activity was determined following growth in Luria-Bertani medium at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm. Data shown are representative of at least three experiments.

To determine the contribution of each bla gene to β-lactam antibiotic resistance in UT223, bla-null mutants were constructed by using the delivery vector pUTE583 and a method described previously (31). UT247 (bla1), UT248 (bla2), UT249 (bla1 bla2) (Table 1), and the parent strain grew at similar rates in Luria-Bertani broth, and bla gene transcripts were not detected in RNA preparations from cultures of the respective mutants (data not shown). β-Lactamase activity of UT223 was defined as 100 arbitrary units. UT247 (bla1) and UT248 (bla2) exhibited approximately one-half of the β-lactamase activity of the parent, while UT249 (bla1 bla2) produced no detectable β-lactamase activity (Fig. 3).

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

β-Lactamase production by B. anthracis strains. β-Lactamase activity was determined following incubation for 7 h at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm, when the cultures were in late log phase. The strains used were UT223 (Penr), UT247 (bla1), UT248 (bla2), UT249 (bla1 bla2), and UM44 (Pens).

The MICs of β-lactam antibiotics were determined for the mutants by use of the broth microdilution method (NCCLS) and Mueller-Hinton broth (BD BioSciences, Sparks, Md.) (25). Results indicate that bla1 is the major contributor to resistance to ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and piperacillin (Table 3), a finding consistent with our previous study of bla function in E. coli (7). We reported previously that Bla2 is a cephalosporinase and that E. coli harboring the cloned bla2 gene is resistant to all but one of these antibiotics (7). However, the contribution of bla2 to cephalosporin resistance is difficult to assess given the high level of intrinsic resistance in B. anthracis. UT249 lacks bla1 and bla2 but is still resistant to cefepime, ceftazidime, and cefpodoxime.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

MICs of antibiotics for B. anthracis strains

B. anthracis is a member of the closely related B. cereus group species. Other members of this group, B. cereus and B. thuringiensis, are generally penicillin resistant, producing inducible β-lactamases. Constitutive β-lactamase-producing mutants of B. cereus have also been reported (4). These mutants produce multiple β-lactamases, but the genetic basis has not been investigated. Our study was limited to single isolates of penicillin-resistant and -susceptible strains, but considering the monomorphic nature of B. anthracis, it is likely that other penicillin-susceptible strains harbor transcriptionally silent bla genes. It is possible that penicillin-resistant and -susceptible B. anthracis strains differ in the functions or levels of expression of their trans-acting bla regulators. Regulation of β-lactamase synthesis has been studied in certain other gram-positive bacteria (11, 36). In Streptomyces cacaoi, the expression of β-lactamase genes is controlled by a regulatory protein, BlaB (22), and mutations in blaB can lead to silencing or constitutive expression of β-lactamase genes (30). Homologs of bla regulators are present in the B. anthracis genome, but they are not linked to either bla gene. Future investigations will address the potential relationship of these genes to bla gene control in B. anthracis.

It is notable that the treatment of anthrax with penicillin is not always successful (13, 24) and the use of penicillin for prophylaxis and treatment of anthrax in experimental animals has had various outcomes (12). Considering reports of naturally occurring penicillin-resistant isolates and the increased concern regarding human anthrax, it is likely that guidelines for antibiotic treatment will continue to be revised. If the various penicillin-resistant isolates are determined to harbor a common mutation, this information may provide a rapid method for determining penicillin resistance at the DNA sequence level.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

DNA sequences of bla1 and bla2 from strain UT223 were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers AY453161 and AY453162 .

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Jasmine Chaitram for assistance with MIC testing.

This work was supported by Public Health Service grant AI33537 from the National Institutes of Health.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 6 April 2004.
    • Returned for modification 16 June 2004.
    • Accepted 13 August 2004.
  • Copyright © 2004 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Agaisse, H., and D. Lereclus. 1994. Structural and functional analysis of the promoter region involved in full expression of the cryIIIA toxin gene of Bacillus thuringiensis. Mol. Microbiol.13:97-107.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.
    Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl. 1996. Current protocols in molecular biology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y.
  3. 3.↵
    Bakici, M. Z., N. Elaldi, M. Bakir, I. Dokmetas, M. Erandac, and M. Turan. 2002. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus anthracis in an endemic area. Scand. J. Infect. Dis.34:564-566.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Bernstein, A., K. W. Nickerson, and R. A. Day. 1967. Thermal penicillinase derepression and temperature dependence of penicillinase production: inducible and constitutive strains of Bacillus cereus. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.119:50-54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Bradaric, N., and V. Punda-Polic. 1992. Cutaneous anthrax due to penicillin-resistant Bacillus anthracis transmitted by an insect bite. Lancet340:306-307.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Cavallo, J.-D., F. Ramisse, M. Girardet, J. Vaissaire, M. Mock, and E. Hernandez. 2002. Antibiotic susceptibilities of 96 isolates of Bacillus anthracis isolated in France between 1994 and 2000. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.46:2307-2309.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Chen, Y., J. Succi, F. C. Tenover, and T. M. Koehler. 2003. β-Lactamase genes of the penicillin-susceptible Bacillus anthracis Sterne strain. J. Bacteriol.185:823-830.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Coker, P. R., K. L. Smith, and M. E. Hugh-Jones. 2002. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of diverse Bacillus anthracis isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.46:3843-3845.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.
    Dai, Z., J.-C. Sirard, M. Mock, and T. M. Koehler. 1995. The atxA gene product activates transcription of the anthrax toxin genes and is essential for virulence. Mol. Microbiol.16:1171-1181.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Doganay, M., and N. Aydin. 1991. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus anthracis. Scand. J. Infect. Dis.23:333-335.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Filee, P., K. Benlafya, M. Delmarcelle, G. Moutzourelis, J. M. Frere, A. Brans, and B. Joris. 2002. The fate of the BlaI repressor during the induction of the Bacillus licheniformis BlaP beta-lactamase. Mol. Microbiol.44:685-694.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Friedlander, A. M., S. L. Welkos, M. L. Pitt, J. W. Ezzell, P. L. Worsham, K. J. Rose, B. E. Ivins, J. R. Lowe, G. B. Howe, P. Mikesell, et al. 1993. Postexposure prophylaxis against experimental inhalation anthrax. J. Infect. Dis.167:1239-1243.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Gold, H. 1967. Treatment of anthrax. Fed. Proc.26:1563-1568.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Green, B. D., L. Battisti, T. M. Koehler, C. B. Thorne, and B. E. Ivins. 1985. Demonstration of a capsule plasmid in Bacillus anthracis. Infect. Immun.49:291-297.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Hoffmaster, A. R., and T. M. Koehler. 1999. Autogenous regulation of the Bacillus anthracis pag operon. J. Bacteriol.181:4485-4492.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Inglesby, T. V., T. O'Toole, D. A. Henderson, J. G. Bartlett, M. S. Ascher, E. Eitzen, A. M. Friedlander, J. Gerberding, J. Hauer, J. Hughes, J. McDade, M. T. Osterholm, G. Parker, T. M. Perl, P. K. Russell, and K. Tonat. 2002. Anthrax as a biological weapon, 2002: updated recommendations for management. JAMA287:2236-2252.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Jackson, P. J., M. E. Hugh-Jones, D. M. Adair, G. Green, K. K. Hill, C. R. Kuske, L. M. Grinberg, F. A. Abramova, and P. Keim. 1998. PCR analysis of tissue samples from the 1979 Sverdlovsk anthrax victims: the presence of multiple Bacillus anthracis strains in different victims. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA95:1224-1229.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Koehler, T. M., Z. Dai, and M. Kaufman-Yarbray. 1994. Regulation of the Bacillus anthracis protective antigen gene: CO2 and a trans-acting element activate transcription from one of two promoters. J. Bacteriol.176:586-595.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Koshimizu, K., M. Ogata, and K. Ishida. 1972. Penicillin-resistant anthrax bacilli isolated from a dead dairy cow. Jpn. Vet. Soc. J.25:184-189.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    Lalitha, M. K., and M. K. Thomas. 1997. Penicillin resistance in Bacillus anthracis. Lancet349:1522.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    Lightfoot, N. F., R. J. D. Scott, and P. C. B. Turnbull. 1990. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus anthracis: proceedings of the International Workshop on Anthrax. Salisbury Med. Bull.68(Suppl.):95-98.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    Magdalena, J., C. Gerard, B. Joris, M. Forsman, and J. Dusart. 1997. The two β-lactamase genes of Streptomyces cacaoi,blaL and blaU, are under the control of the same regulatory system. Mol. Gen. Genet.255:187-193.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Materon, I. C., A. M. Queenan, T. M. Koehler, K. Bush, and T. Palzkill. 2003. Biochemical characterization of β-lactamases Bla1 and Bla2 from Bacillus anthracis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.47:2040-2042.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    McSwiggan, D. A., K. K. Hussain, and I. O. Taylor. 1974. A fatal case of cutaneous anthrax. J. Hyg.73:151-156.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    Mohammed, M. J., C. K. Marston, T. Popovic, R. S. Weyant, and F. C. Tenover. 2002. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Bacillus anthracis: comparison of results obtained by using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth microdilution reference and Etest agar gradient diffusion methods. J. Clin. Microbiol.40:1902-1907.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    Odendaal, M. W., P. M. Pieterson, V. de Vos, and A. D. Botha. 1991. The antibiotic sensitivity patterns of Bacillus anthracis isolated from the Kruger National Park. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res.58:17-19.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.
    Palmer, B. R., and M. G. Marinus. 1994. The dam and dcm strains of Escherichia coli—a review. Gene143:1-12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.
    Perez-Casal, J., M. G. Caparon, and J. R. Scott. 1991. Mry, a trans-acting positive regulator of the M protein gene of Streptococcus pyogenes with similarity to the receptor proteins of two-component regulatory systems. J. Bacteriol.173:2617-2624.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    Philippon, A., J. Dusart, B. Joris, and J. M. Frere. 1998. The diversity, structure and regulation of β-lactamases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.54:341-346.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    Raskin, C., C. Gerard, S. Donfut, E. Giannotta, G. Van Driessche, J. Van Beeumen, and J. Dusart. 2003. BlaB, a protein involved in the regulation of Streptomyces cacaoi β-lactamases, is a penicillin-binding protein. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.60:1460-1469.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    Saile, E., and T. M. Koehler. 2002. Control of anthrax toxin gene expression by the transition state regulator abrB. J. Bacteriol.184:370-380.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    Severn, M. 1976. A fatal case of pulmonary anthrax. Br. Med. J.1:748.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    Sterne, M. 1939. The use of anthrax vaccines prepared from avirulent (uncapsulated) variants of Bacillus anthracis. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. Anim. Ind.13:307-312.
    OpenUrl
  34. 34.↵
    Thorne, C. B. 1993. Bacillus anthracis, p. 113-124. In A. L. Sonenshein, J. A. Hoch, and R. Losick (ed.), Bacillus subtilis and other gram-positive bacteria: biochemistry, physiology, and molecular genetics. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
  35. 35.
    Thorne, C. B. 1985. Genetics of Bacillus anthracis, p. 56-62. In L. Leive (ed.), Microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
  36. 36.↵
    Zhang, H. Z., C. J. Hackbarth, K. M. Chansky, and H. F. Chambers. 2001. A proteolytic transmembrane signaling pathway and resistance to β-lactams in staphylococci. Science291:1962-1965.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
β-Lactamase Gene Expression in a Penicillin-Resistant Bacillus anthracis Strain
Yahua Chen, Fred C. Tenover, Theresa M. Koehler
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Nov 2004, 48 (12) 4873-4877; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4873-4877.2004

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
β-Lactamase Gene Expression in a Penicillin-Resistant Bacillus anthracis Strain
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
β-Lactamase Gene Expression in a Penicillin-Resistant Bacillus anthracis Strain
Yahua Chen, Fred C. Tenover, Theresa M. Koehler
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Nov 2004, 48 (12) 4873-4877; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4873-4877.2004
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacillus anthracis
Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial
Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic
penicillin resistance
beta-lactamases

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596