Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mechanisms of Resistance

Inducible Metronidazole Resistance and nim Genes in Clinical Bacteroidesfragilis Group Isolates

Sonja Löfmark, Hong Fang, Maria Hedberg, Charlotta Edlund
Sonja Löfmark
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Bacteriology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm
2Södertörns Högskola, Huddinge, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hong Fang
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Bacteriology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Hedberg
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Bacteriology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charlotta Edlund
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Bacteriology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm
2Södertörns Högskola, Huddinge, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: charlotta.edlund@labmed.ki.se
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.49.3.1253-1256.2005
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Nitroimidazole resistance (nim) genes were detected in 2% of 1,502 clinical Bacteroidesfragilis group strains isolated from 19 European countries, and a novel nim gene was identified. High metronidazole resistance could be induced in nim-positive strains, which emphasizes the importance of acknowledging metronidazole resistance in the clinical setting.

Anaerobic infections are common and can cause diseases associated with severe morbidity but are easily overlooked in the clinical setting. Bacteroidesfragilis group species are opportunistic pathogens that constitute a dominating bacterial group in the normal intestinal microflora. In particular, B. fragilis is among the most clinically relevant anaerobic species. Interspecies lateral transfer of resistance genes among anaerobes has been shown for several clinically important antimicrobial agents such as beta-lactam agents, clindamycin, tetracycline, and metronidazole (3, 17, 19, 22, 24). Metronidazole, a 5-nitroimidazole agent, is particularly useful against Bacteroides spp. that tend to be resistant to a wide range of antimicrobial agents (1, 2). Although the rate of resistance remains low, at <1%, metronidazole-resistant organisms are beginning to emerge (8, 11, 15, 16, 21). Five nitroimidazole resistance genes, nimA to -E, have been identified that confer reduced susceptibility to 5-nitroimidazole antibiotics on species of the B. fragilis group (10, 23, 26). The proposed resistance mechanism conferred by the nim genes is that they encode a 5-nitroimidazole reductase (4). Four of the nim genes have been shown to be associated with different mobile insertion sequence (IS) elements flanked by inverted repeats (10, 25). There is strong evidence that these IS elements carry regulatory signals for expression of certain resistance genes, including the nim genes (10, 13, 15, 21, 25).

A total number of 1,502 clinical B. fragilis group isolates were surveyed for the prevalence and distribution of various nim genes. The strains, originating from a previous surveillance study of antimicrobial susceptibility including 19 European countries (11), were collected during 1999 to 2001. The different Bacteroides species had previously been identified by conventional biochemical tests, and the MIC of metronidazole was determined by the agar dilution method as recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) (14).

The strains were screened for nim genes by PCR with specific primers (26) and cleaved with the restriction enzyme Hsp92II for determination of the nim type. In addition, HpaII and TacI were used for selected strains. One strain (HUN19) was sequenced after it was found to have unique and novel restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) patterns. All nim-positive strains were further investigated by PCR for associated IS elements and the locations of the elements with respect to the nim gene (17) with specific primers newly designed or previously described (10).

Twelve nim-positive clinical strains for which the initial MICs were relatively low (0.25 to 8.0 μg/ml), representing different species and nim types, were tested for induction of metronidazole resistance by a broth microdilution technique. The nim genes, as well as the region directly upstream including the IS element-borne promoter, were sequenced both pre- and postinduction.

Thirty (2%) of the 1,502 B. fragilis strains studied turned out to be positive for nim genes. The RFLP analyses of the different nim genes resulted in unique fragment patterns (Fig. 1). All five previously described nim genes were detected, and a novel nim gene (nimF) was detected that showed a significant difference in its DNA sequence (EMBL nucleotide sequence database accession no. AJ515145 ). Pairwise alignment and comparison by ClustalW/EMBL revealed 69 to 78% identity between the different nim genes. The highest identity to the novel nimF gene was shown by nimD at 78%, followed by nimB (75%), nimA and -C (71%), and nimE (69%).

Twenty-three of the 30 nim-positive strains each harbored one detectable IS element (Table 1). It was also demonstrated that in 11 of the 12 nim-positive strains tested that were susceptible or had reduced susceptibility to metronidazole (MIC, 0.25 to 8.0 μg/ml) a high level of resistance (MIC, ≥256 μg/ml) could be induced after three passages in subinhibitory concentrations of metronidazole, whereas this phenomenon could not be induced in strains lacking nim genes or in the nimF-positive strain.

Less than 1% of the strains (6 of 1,502), of which 2 carried a nim gene, were resistant to metronidazole according to the breakpoint recommended by the NCCLS. The distribution of the MICs for nim-negative and nim-positive strains indicates that these two groups constitute two distinct populations (Fig. 2). Although the relative risk of metronidazole resistance for strains harboring a nim gene was significant (odds ratio of 26 [95% confidence interval, 4.6 to 149]), the relative risk for reduced susceptibility with a MIC of at least 8.0 μg/ml, a clinically relevant breakpoint, was even higher (odds ratio of 53 [95% confidence interval, 19 to 147]), further emphasizing the relevance of nim genes in conferring resistance to metronidazole. These results are supported by a previous study by Stubbs et al. (23). The finding of four highly metronidazole-resistant strains (MIC, >64 μg/ml) and one strain with borderline resistance (MIC, 16 μg/ml), all lacking nim genes, indicates the importance of additional mechanisms of resistance.

The most common nim identity in the present study was nimA, which was detected in 53% of the strains (Table 1), which is in agreement with the findings of Stubbs et al. (23). According to Lubbe et al., there is an indication of a potential nimA gene source in anaerobic environments (12). In 20 of the 23 isolates harboring IS elements, the transposable genes were shown to be situated directly upstream of the corresponding nim gene. None of the susceptible nim-negative type strains harbored any of the IS elements investigated. No correlation was shown between the species or MICs and the presence of IS elements among the 30 nim-positive strains. One highly resistant strain, GBR13, lacked known IS elements, suggesting the possible presence of an unknown IS element, involvement of other ways of activating the nim gene, or other resistance mechanisms.

Of the 12 strains tested for susceptibility to induction, high-level resistance was induced in 9 carrying nim genes and IS elements (Table 2), irreversibly in 2 of them. High-level resistance (MIC, 256 μg/ml) was reversibly induced in two strains, AUT85 and DNK5, in which no IS element was detected. This either indicates the presence of an unknown IS element not detected by the primers used or puts into question the notion that IS elements are mandatory for induction. No alterations of IS element position or mutational events in the nim genes or promoter region of the sequence were recorded in the strains with the induced high-resistance phenotypes compared to their preinduction state.

The fact that a high level of resistance could be reversibly induced in susceptible strains or strains with slightly reduced susceptibility indicates that under clinical conditions, metronidazole treatment could select for a nim-positive subpopulation with potential resistance to the drug. Similar observations were recently reported by Gal and Brazier (9). Together with the reported transferability of the nim genes (17, 24), this indicates the clinical importance of the B. fragilis group in the human colon as a reservoir of metronidazole resistance. Metronidazole treatment may also lead to other unwanted effects in addition to selection for resistance, such as increased virulence, as demonstrated by Diniz et al. (5).

It is important to acknowledge the emerging resistance to metronidazole within the B. fragilis group. Clinical failures following metronidazole treatment due to Bacteroides strains with reduced susceptibility have been reported (7, 18, 20). Different mechanisms of resistance have been proposed (4, 6), and the importance of nim genes has been reported by several groups (3, 10, 25). Knowledge of the resistance status and the mechanisms of resistance is critical for the choice of antimicrobial therapy and the design of new antimicrobial agents, as well as in prevention of dissemination of resistant strains in clinical medicine. The reliance upon the metronidazole susceptibility tests used in many clinical bacteriology laboratories for detection of anaerobes in primary cultures may have contributed to an underreporting of metronidazole-resistant strains (2, 23). The NCCLS-recommended breakpoint of 32 μg/ml is high, which means that strains with reduced susceptibility are easily overlooked by conventional methods.

In this large surveillance study including 1,502 clinical B. fragilis group strains, we have shown that only a low number of strains were judged resistant but 2% of the strains constituted a subpopulation of nim-positive strains with decreased susceptibility to metronidazole. The fact that high levels of resistance were easily induced in nim-positive strains is of great clinical concern and emphasizes the importance of acknowledging metronidazole resistance in the clinical setting.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

PCR-RFLP patterns of the nimA to -F genes cleaved with restriction enzyme Hsp92II. A 100-bp marker was used on the agarose gel, which was stained with ethidium bromide. The expected and obtained fragment sizes were 347 and 69 bp for nimA; 297, 94, 80, and 77 bp for nimB; 364 and 94 bp for nimC; 193, 94, 80, and 70 bp for nimD; 441 bp for nimE; and 250, 94, and 80 bp for nimF.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Distribution of MICs for nim-positive (n = 30) and nim-negative (n = 1,472) clinical B. fragilis group strains isolated from 19 European countries (1999 to 2001).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

MICs of metronidazole, nim loci, and presence of IS elements in nim-positive Bacteroides sp. strains

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

MICs of metronidazole before and after exposure to subinhibitory concentrations of metronidazole for three passages and after three additional passages without metronidazole

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to G. Reysset for the reference strains for nimA to -D (B. fragilis 638R/pIP417, BF8, 638R/pIP419, and 638R/pIP421, respectively) and to J. Stubbs and J. S. Brazier for the reference strain for nimE (B. fragilis R6881).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 24 June 2004.
    • Returned for modification 11 September 2004.
    • Accepted 14 November 2004.
  • Copyright © 2005 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Aldridge, K. E. 1995. The occurrence, virulence, and antimicrobial resistance of anaerobes in polymicrobial infections. Am. J. Surg.169:2S-7S.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Brazier, J. S., S. L. Stubbs, and B. I. Duerden. 1999. Metronidazole resistance among clinical isolates belonging to the Bacteroidesfragilis group: time to be concerned? J. Antimicrob. Chemother.44:580-581.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Breuil, J., A. Dublanchet, N. Truffaut, and M. Sebald. 1989. Transferable 5-nitroimidazole resistance in the Bacteroidesfragilis group. Plasmid21:151-154.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Carlier, J. P., N. Sellier, M. N. Rager, and G. Reysset. 1997. Metabolism of a 5-nitroimidazole in susceptible and resistant isogenic strains of Bacteroidesfragilis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.41:1495-1499.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Diniz, C. G., R. M. Arantes, D. C. Cara, F. L. Lima, J. R. Nicoli, M. A. Carvalho, and L. M. Farias. 2003. Enhanced pathogenicity of susceptible strains of the Bacteroidesfragilis group subjected to low doses of metronidazole. Microbes Infect.5:19-26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Edwards, D. I. 1993. Nitroimidazole drugs—action and resistance mechanisms. II. Mechanisms of resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.31:201-210.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Elsaghier, A. A., J. S. Brazier, and E. A. James. 2003. Bacteraemia due to Bacteroidesfragilis with reduced susceptibility to metronidazole. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.51:1436-1437.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Fang, H., C. Edlund, G. Zhang, and M. Hedberg. 1999. Detection of imipenem-resistant and metronidazole-resistant Bacteroidesfragilis group strains in fecal samples. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.5:753-758.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    Gal, M., and J. S. Brazier. 2004. Metronidazole resistance in Bacteroides spp. carrying nim genes and the selection of slow-growing metronidazole-resistant mutants. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.54:109-116.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Haggoud, A., G. Reysset, H. Azeddoug, and M. Sebald. 1994. Nucleotide sequence analysis of two 5-nitroimidazole resistance determinants from Bacteroides strains and of a new insertion sequence upstream of the two genes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.38:1047-1051.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Hedberg, M., and C. E. Nord. 2003. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacteroidesfragilis group isolates in Europe. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.9:475-488.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Lubbe, M. M., K. Stanley, and L. J. Chalkley. 1999. Prevalence of nim genes in anaerobic/facultative anaerobic bacteria isolated in South Africa. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.172:79-83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Nagy, E., J. Soki, E. Urban, I. Szoke, E. Fodor, and R. Edwards. 2001. Occurrence of metronidazole and imipenem resistance among Bacteroidesfragilis group clinical isolates in Hungary. Acta Biol. Hung.52:271-280.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2000. Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria—5th edition: approved standards M11-A5. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, Pa.
  15. 15.↵
    Podglajen, I., J. Breuil, A. Rohaut, C. Monsempes, and E. Collatz. 2001. Multiple mobile promoter regions for the rare carbapenem resistance gene of Bacteroidesfragilis. J. Bacteriol.183:3531-3535.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Rasmussen, B. A., K. Bush, and F. P. Tally. 1997. Antimicrobial resistance in anaerobes. Clin. Infect. Dis.24(Suppl. 1):S110-S120.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Reysset, G. 1996. Genetics of 5-nitroimidazole resistance in Bacteroides species. Anaerobe2:59-69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Rotimi, V. O., M. Khoursheed, J. S. Brazier, W. Y. Jamal, and F. B. Khodakhast. 1999. Bacteroides species highly resistant to metronidazole: an emerging clinical problem? Clin. Microbiol. Infect.5:166-169.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Salyers, A. A., and N. B. Shoemaker. 1996. Resistance gene transfer in anaerobes: new insights, new problems. Clin. Infect. Dis.23(Suppl. 1):S36-S43.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Schapiro, J. M., R. Gupta, E. Stefansson, F. C. Fang, and A. P. Limaye. 2004. Isolation of metronidazole-resistant Bacteroidesfragilis carrying the nimA nitroreductase gene from a patient in Washington State. J. Clin. Microbiol.42:4127-4129.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    Sebald, M. 1994. Genetic basis for antibiotic resistance in anaerobes. Clin. Infect. Dis.18(Suppl.)4:S297-S304.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    Shoemaker, N. B., H. Vlamakis, K. Hayes, and A. A. Salyers. 2001. Evidence for extensive resistance gene transfer among Bacteroides spp. and among Bacteroides and other genera in the human colon. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.67:561-568.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    Stubbs, S. L., J. S. Brazier, P. R. Talbot, and B. I. Duerden. 2000. PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis for identification of Bacteroides spp. and characterization of nitroimidazole resistance genes. J. Clin. Microbiol.38:3209-3213.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    Trinh, S., A. Haggoud, and G. Reysset. 1996. Conjugal transfer of the 5-nitroimidazole resistance plasmid pIP417 from Bacteroidesvulgatus BV-17: characterization and nucleotide sequence analysis of the mobilization region. J. Bacteriol.178:6671-6676.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    Trinh, S., A. Haggoud, G. Reysset, and M. Sebald. 1995. Plasmids pIP419 and pIP421 from Bacteroides: 5-nitroimidazole resistance genes and their upstream insertion sequence elements. Microbiology141(Pt. 4):927-935.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    Trinh, S., and G. Reysset. 1996. Detection by PCR of the nim genes encoding 5-nitroimidazole resistance in Bacteroides spp. J. Clin. Microbiol.34:2078-2084.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Inducible Metronidazole Resistance and nim Genes in Clinical Bacteroidesfragilis Group Isolates
Sonja Löfmark, Hong Fang, Maria Hedberg, Charlotta Edlund
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Feb 2005, 49 (3) 1253-1256; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.49.3.1253-1256.2005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inducible Metronidazole Resistance and nim Genes in Clinical Bacteroidesfragilis Group Isolates
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Inducible Metronidazole Resistance and nim Genes in Clinical Bacteroidesfragilis Group Isolates
Sonja Löfmark, Hong Fang, Maria Hedberg, Charlotta Edlund
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Feb 2005, 49 (3) 1253-1256; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.49.3.1253-1256.2005
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacteroides fragilis
Drug Resistance, Bacterial
metronidazole

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596