Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Experimental Therapeutics

Peptide Nucleic Acid Antisense Oligomer as a Therapeutic Strategy against Bacterial Infection: Proof of Principle Using Mouse Intraperitoneal Infection

Xin-Xing Tan, Jeffrey K. Actor, Yin Chen
Xin-Xing Tan
1Cytogenix, Inc., 3100 Wilcrest Dr., Suite 140, Houston, Texas 77042
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: xxtan@cytogenix.com
Jeffrey K. Actor
2Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Medical School, 6431 Fannin St., Houston, Texas 77030
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yin Chen
1Cytogenix, Inc., 3100 Wilcrest Dr., Suite 140, Houston, Texas 77042
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.49.8.3203-3207.2005
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) and their analogs have been successfully utilized to inhibit gene expression and bacterial growth in vitro or in cell culture. In this study, acpP-targeting antisense peptide nucleic acid (PNA) and its peptide conjugate were tested as potential antibacterial agents in two groups of experiments using a mouse model. In the first group, Escherichia coli mutant strain SM101 with a defective outer membrane was used to induce bacteremia and peritonitis in BALB/c mice by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection. The resulting bacteremia was fatal within 48 h. A single i.p injection of 5 nmol (or more) of PNA administered 30 min before bacterial challenge significantly reduced the bacterial load in mouse blood. Reductions in serum concentrations of the proinflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, and IL-12 were also observed. PNA treatment was effective in rescuing 100% of infected animals. In the second group, bacteremia in BALB/c mice was induced by i.p. injection of E. coli wild-type strain K-12. The infected mice were treated by a single intravenous injection of peptide-PNA conjugate 30 min after bacterial challenge. Treatment with the peptide-PNA conjugate significantly reduced the K-12 load, with modest reduction in cytokine concentrations. The conjugate treatment was also able to rescue up to 60% of infected animals. This report is the first demonstration of ODNs' antibacterial efficacy in an animal disease model. The ability of PNA and its peptide conjugate to inhibit bacterial growth and to prevent fatal infection demonstrates the potential for this new class of antibacterial agents.

The use of oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) has been successful in a variety of applications to silence gene expression in eukaryotic systems for drug target validation and therapeutic purposes (3-5, 11). With the development of ODN analogs such as phosphorothioate, peptide nucleic acid (PNA), and phosphodiamidate morpholino oligomer (PMO) (for reviews, see references 6 and 19), the ODN gene silencing technology has been increasingly utilized to down-regulate target genes that are critical for bacterial viability, thus inhibiting bacterial growth (14, 15, 31). Antisense ODNs (AS-ODNs) have also been used to interfere with the expression of resistance genes so as to increase the bactericidal action of existing antibiotics (12, 26, 35). A range of expression plasmids have been developed to generate oligonucleotide molecules endogenously in bacterial cells, and these expression systems have been utilized to screen oligonucleotide libraries for identification of essential bacterial genes and to facilitate isolation of bactericidal oligonucleotide agents (18, 32).

A major challenge for the utilization of ODN gene silencing technology is the inefficient entry of sufficient numbers of ODNs into the targeted bacterial pathogen due to restrictions imposed by the outer membrane barrier. Methods have been recently developed to overcome this membrane barrier resistance. For example, some cell-permeabilizing peptides, when covalently attached to ODNs, enable the resulting peptide-ODN conjugate to traverse the outer membrane and have been shown to greatly improve antisense activity (10, 13, 23). Negatively charged liposomes have been successfully used to encapsulate and deliver ODNs into bacterial cells (7).

Given the critical role of fatty acid biosynthesis (FAB) in bacterial survival and the difference between bacterial and mammalian FAB pathways, the exploration of FAB for novel antibacterial agents has increased significantly in the last several years (21, 24). In particular, the FAB protein ACP encoded by the acpP gene has been shown to be a valid target for developing novel antibacterial agents (10, 13). Bacteria such as Escherichia coli normally synthesize fatty acids in three stages: initiation, cyclic elongation, and transfer to the membrane bilayer. The ACP protein acts early in the pathway and is required throughout the process (8, 21). Bacterial ACP protein also has important functions as a donor of activated fatty acyl groups during biosynthesis of phospholipids, lipid A, lipoteichoic acid, and acylated homoserine lactones (1, 2, 16, 17, 25, 27, 28). Therefore, depletion of the ACP pool will interfere with these diverse physiological processes, leading to cell dysfunction and death. It has been shown that acpP-targeting PNA-ODN and PMO-ODN are both bactericidal in vitro (10, 13).

In this work, the ability of the acpP-targeting antisense PNA and its peptide conjugate to inhibit bacterial growth in vivo and to rescue mice from infection was tested. The results show that treatment of infected mice with PNA and the peptide-PNA conjugate significantly reduced the bacterial load in the blood and effectively prevented fatal infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and growth conditions. E. coli strain SM105 [thr-1 araC14 tsx-78 Δ(galK-attλ)99 hisG4 rfbD1 rpsL136 sylA5 mtl-1 thi-1] and its isogenic derivative SM101 (9) with a defective outer membrane were purchased from the E. coli Genetic Stock Center (New Haven, CT). SM101 is deficient in the UDP-N-acetylglucosamine acyltransferase, and its lipid A content is only one-third of that of wild-type SM105. The low lipid A content causes the outer membrane of SM101 to be permeable to high-molecular-weight substances like PNA. SM101 and SM105 cells were grown at 30°C in Luria-Bertani (LB; Becton Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD) medium containing 50 μg/ml streptomycin. E. coli strain K-12 was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC 29425) and grown at 37°C in nutrient broth.

Chemical synthesis of PNA and peptide-PNA conjugate.PNA and peptide-PNA conjugate were synthesized by Bio-Synthesis (Dallas, TX). Briefly, PNA with the sequence CTCATACTCT and peptide-PNA conjugate with the sequence KFFKFFKFFK-CTCATACTCT were synthesized manually on a solid phase by following the procedures described by Good et al. (13) using PNA monomers from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA) and amino acid residues from Novabiochem (San Diego, CA). The crude PNA or conjugate was then purified using high-performance liquid chromatography and identified and confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry.

Inhibition of bacterial growth in vitro. E. coli SM101, SM105, or K-12 isolates were grown as described above (9, 22). Cell cultures were diluted to ∼105 CFU/ml, and PNA or the peptide-PNA conjugate was added to a final concentration of 0, 4, 40, or 400 μM as described by Good and Nielsen (12). After incubation with shaking at 37°C for various times, aliquots of cell cultures were collected for cell growth assay by measuring viable cell counts. Viable cell counting was done by diluting the cultures and plating them in triplicate on LB plates. The plates were then incubated overnight at 37°C, and the colonies were enumerated by visual inspection.

Mouse intraperitoneal model of E. coli infection.Mice were infected intra-abdominally to induce peritonitis according to the established protocols (20, 29, 30) under University of Texas—Houston Health Science Center animal welfare guidelines (HSC-AWC-02-059). BALB/c mice were used for infection experiments due to genetic control of the endotoxic response linked to lipopolysaccharide and CD14 (33, 34). For each infection experiment, 6- or 8-week-old female BALB/c mice in groups of six to eight were used. Mice were housed four to a cage and kept in a laminar-flow cabinet under specific-pathogen-free conditions for 2 weeks before use and monitored throughout experimentation under Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee-approved guidelines. Bacterial cells of log-phase cultures (optical density at 600 nm = ∼1.0) were collected by centrifugation and then resuspended in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 4°C. This log-phase preparation of bacteria was serially diluted in PBS, and a 70% lethal dose (LD70) of strain SM101 (approximately 1.2 × 109 CFU) or an LD90 of strain K-12 (approximately 8 × 108 CFU) was injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) into mice in 500-μl aliquots. Infected mice were observed for up to 9 days. Blood samples (up to 300 μl) were collected at 24 h after bacterial challenge by puncturing the orbital plexus with a heparinized capillary tube. The collected blood samples were used for bacterial titer analysis and proinflammatory cytokine (tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-α], interleukin-1β [IL-1β], IL-6, and IL-12) determination as described below.

PNA or peptide-PNA conjugate treatment.The therapeutic efficacy of PNA or peptide-PNA conjugate was evaluated using the mouse model above. Groups of mice were challenged by i.p. injection of E. coli SM101 or K-12. SM101-infected mice were treated with a single injection of PNA administered i.p. 30 min before the bacterial challenge. K-12-infected mice were treated with a single injection of peptide-PNA conjugate administered intravenously 30 min after the bacterial challenge. The control groups included mice treated with PBS alone.

Bacterial titer analysis.Blood samples collected at 24 h postinfection were serially diluted, plated onto LB agar plates, and incubated overnight at 37°C. The colonies on the plates were enumerated by visual inspection.

ELISA evaluation for proinflammatory cytokines.Blood was collected using heparinized tubes at 24 h postinfection. Cells were removed by centrifugation, and the remaining serum was assessed for production of proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-12. Evaluation was accomplished using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) DuoSet kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, Costar 96-well vinyl assay plates were coated with capture antibody overnight (e.g., TNF-α at 0.5 μg/ml, IL-6 at 1 μg/ml). Plates were washed three times with wash buffer (0.05% Tween 20 in PBS). Blocking buffer (1% bovine serum albumin, 5% sucrose, 0.05% NaN3 in PBS) was added for a 3-h incubation. After three washings, 10 μl serum (final dilution of 1:20 in PBS) was added for a 2-h incubation. Biotin-conjugated secondary antibodies were added, incubated for 2 h, washed, and then developed using streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and TMB Microwell peroxidase substrate (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). Absorbance was read at 570 nm and 450 nm on an ELISA plate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). Means of duplicate or triplicate wells were calculated based on a standard curve constructed for each assay, using recombinant murine cytokines (R&D Systems). The limit of sensitivity for these assays is 5 pg/ml.

RESULTS

Inhibition of SM101 growth in vitro by acpP-targeting PNA.Inhibition of E. coli SM101 growth was evaluated by examining the effects of various PNA concentrations. As shown in Fig. 1, compared with the cell culture without PNA, the viable cells in cultures with PNA were significantly reduced. The inhibition of bacterial growth was both time and concentration dependent. However, this inhibition was not observed in wild-type E. coli SM105 cells (data not shown).

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Inhibition of E. coli mutant SM101 growth in vitro by acpP-targeting PNA. PNA was added to cell cultures containing 5 × 105 CFU/ml SM101 to a final concentration of 4, 40, or 400 μM as indicated on the graph, with addition of an equal volume of water as a control (0 μM). Cultures were incubated as described in Materials and Methods. Aliquots of each culture were collected at 2 and 4 h, diluted, and plated for viable cell determination. Error bars indicate standard deviations of the results from three experiments (*, P < 0.01 relative to 2 h control; **, P < 0.001 relative to 4-h control [as determined by Student's t test]).

Rescue of SM101-infected mice by acpP-targeting PNA.SM101 (LD70) was i.p. introduced into mice, and animals were observed for 1 week. All mice showed evidence of infection soon after bacterial administration (6 h), with characteristics such as lethargy, warmth to the touch, and scruffiness. Of the control (untreated) mice, 62.5% succumbed to infection within 48 h after receipt of SM101 (Fig. 2). Untreated mice (four of six) demonstrated high levels of bacteria in serum at 24 h postinfection, while treatment of mice with 5 nmol or 50 nmol PNA led to complete absence of bacteria at that time (Table 1). Of significance, all of the six mice treated with PNA at either dose level survived (Fig. 2).

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Survival of SM101-infected mice due to PNA treatment. Six-week-old BALB/c were infected and treated as described in the text. The infected mice (LD70) were monitored every 4 to 6 h for survival through 7 days. Six to eight mice were infected per group, and the experiments were repeated with nearly identical results.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Reduction of SM101 inoculum in mouse blood by acpP-targeting PNAa

As shown in Table 2, untreated mice exhibited marked increases in IL-6 and IL-12 and minor elevations in TNF-α and IL-1β. Treatment with PNA at a 5-nmol level led to significant reductions (P < 0.05) in serum IL-6 and IL-12. At a dose of 50 nmol, significant and substantial reductions were seen in TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-12.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Reduction of proinflammatory cytokines in serum by acpP-targeting PNAa

Inhibition of K-12 growth in vitro by peptide-PNA conjugate.The cationic peptide with the sequence KFFKFFKFFK was previously shown to be effective in carrying PNA (as peptide-PNA conjugate) across the membrane barrier (13). The acpP-targeting peptide-PNA conjugate was produced to examine antibacterial efficacy against wild-type E. coli (strain K-12). As shown in Fig. 3, compared with the cell cultures in the absence of the conjugate, the viable cells in culture were significantly reduced in the presence of the conjugate; no viable K-12 cell was detected in the cultures with 40 μM or 400 μM conjugate. This inhibition was not observed in cell cultures with addition of peptide alone; after incubation for 4 h, 2.1 × 107 CFU/ml and 1.4 × 107 CFU/ml K-12 cells were detected in the cultures with 40 μM and 400 μM peptide, respectively (data not shown in Fig. 3).

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Inhibition of E. coli wild-type K-12 growth in vitro by acpP-targeting peptide-PNA conjugate. Peptide-PNA conjugate was added to cell cultures containing 5 × 105 CFU/ml E. coli strain K-12 to a final concentration of 0, 4, 40, or 400 μM as indicated on the graph. Cell cultures were grown, and viable cells were determined as described in the legend to Fig. 1. Error bars indicate standard deviations of the results from two experiments (*, P < 0.001 relative to 2-h control; **, P < 0.005 relative to 4-h control [as determined by Student's t test]).

Rescue of K-12-infected mice by the peptide-PNA conjugate.As shown in Fig. 4, untreated mice (90%) succumbed to infection within 48 h. Mice treated with the low PNA conjugate dose (100 nmol) succumbed to infection in a manner similar to controls. However, all mice treated with 500 nmol peptide-PNA conjugate exhibited a survival benefit. Treatment with peptide-PNA conjugate also significantly reduced the bacterial load; serum collected at 24 h postinfection showed significantly reduced levels of bacteria for the groups treated with 100 or 500 nmol (P < 0.05) (Table 3).

FIG. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 4.

Survival of K-12-infected mice due to treatment with acpP-targeting peptide-PNA conjugate. Six-week-old BALB/c mice were i.p. infected with 8 × 108 CFU E. coli strain K-12 in 500 μl PBS (LD90). Infected mice were treated with the peptide-PNA conjugate (100 or 500 nmol) 30 min postinfection; comparisons are made to untreated mice. Survival and general health of these animals was monitored every 6 to 12 h through 9 days.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Reduction of E. coli K-12 bacteremia in mice following treatment with peptide-PNA conjugatea

Although the level of bacteremia correlated well with survival, there was only a modest reduction in the concentrations of the proinflammatory cytokines; TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-12 were all marginally reduced, but not significantly (Table 4).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4.

Reduction of proinflammatory mediators in serum by peptide-PNA conjugatea

DISCUSSION

AS-ODNs and their analogs have been demonstrated to be effective in inhibiting bacterial gene expression and cell growth (10, 12-15, 26, 31), making this technology attractive for developing highly specific and efficacious antibacterial agents. Inhibition of bacterial growth by AS-ODN analogs was well established in vitro or in cell culture, but evidence of their biological effect in vivo is lacking. In this work, we tested the acpP-targeting antisense PNA and its peptide conjugate for their abilities to inhibit bacterial growth in vivo, using a mouse model of bacterial infection. Previous studies have shown that acpP-targeting AS-PMO and AS-PNA can significantly inhibit bacterial growth by specifically silencing acpP expression (10, 13). Our results further confirm the inhibition of bacterial growth in vitro by acpP-targeting AS-ODN. More importantly, treatment of the bacterium-infected mice with the acpP-targeting PNA or its peptide conjugate can significantly reduce the bacterial load in mouse blood (Tables 1 and 3), with concomitant reductions in the concentrations of the proinflammatory cytokines in serum (Tables 2 and 4). acpP-targeting PNA and its peptide conjugate were also able to rescue more than 60% (up to 100%) of the infected animals (Fig. 2 and 4).

Although the therapeutic application of the acpP-targeting AS-ODN was examined, it should be feasible to utilize AS-ODNs targeted toward any critical bacterial gene. Due to the genetic nature of antisense technology, it holds promise for the development of both broad-spectrum and specific-spectrum antibacterial agents. AS-ODNs designed to target the conserved regions of highly conserved genes are more likely to be useful as broad-spectrum agents. A cocktail of AS-ODNs targeting many disparate genes is another strategy to pursue broad-spectrum activity, as it has been demonstrated that the effects of AS-ODNs against different genes are cumulative (15). In contrast, AS-ODNs targeting genes unique to certain organisms are less likely to cross-react with others.

In conclusion, the results presented here demonstrate that AS-ODNs, when conjugated to membrane-permeabilizing peptides, can effectively inhibit bacterial growth in vivo and may be useful as therapeutic agents. Furthermore, additional research should be accomplished so that the carrier peptide and its cross-linker to ODN may be optimized for clinical application.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Harilyn McMicken and Shen-An Hwang for technical support and Samuel Kaplan, Malcolm Skolnick, and Kurt Berens for reviewing the manuscript and consultation on data interpretation.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 16 February 2005.
    • Returned for modification 17 April 2005.
    • Accepted 14 May 2005.
  • Copyright © 2005 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Anderson, M. S., and C. R. Raetz. 1987. Biosynthesis of lipid A precursors in Escherichia coli. A cytoplasmic acyltransferase that converts UDP-N-acetylglucosamine to UDP-3-O-(R-3-hydroxymyristoyl)-N-acetylglucosamine. J. Biol. Chem.262:5159-5169.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Cao, J. G., and E. A. Meighen. 1993. Biosynthesis and stereochemistry of the autoinducer controlling luminescence in Vibrio harveyi. J. Bacteriol.175:3856-3862.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Chen, Y., Y. J. Ji, R. Roxby, and C. Conrad. 2000. In vivo expression of single-stranded DNA in mammalian cells with DNA enzyme sequences targeted to C-raf. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev.10:415-422.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.
    Chen, Y., and H. W. McMicken. 2003. Intracellular production of DNA enzyme by a novel single-stranded DNA expression vector. Gene Ther.10:1776-1780.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Datta, H. J., and P. M. Glazer. 2001. Intracellular generation of single-stranded DNA for chromosomal triplex formation and induced recombination. Nucleic Acids Res.29:5140-5147.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Dias, N., and C. A. Stein. 2002. Antisense oligonucleotides: basic concepts and mechanisms. Mol. Cancer Ther.1:347-355.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Fillion, P., A. Desjardins, K. Sayasith, and J. Lagace. 2001. Encapsulation of DNA in negatively charged liposomes and inhibition of bacterial gene expression with fluid liposome-encapsulated antisense oligonucleotides. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1515:44-54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Flaman, A. S., J. M. Chen, S. C. van Iderstine, and D. M. Byers. 2001. Site-directed mutagenesis of acyl carrier protein (ACP) reveals amino acid residues involved in ACP structure and acyl-ACP synthetase activity. J. Biol. Chem.276:35934-35939.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Galloway, S. M., and C. R. Raetz. 1990. A mutant of Escherichia coli defective in the first step of endotoxin biosynthesis. J. Biol. Chem.265:6394-6402.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Geller, B. L., J. D. Deere, D. A. Stein, A. D. Kroeker, H. M. Moulton, and P. L. Iversen. 2003. Inhibition of gene expression in Escherichia coli by antisense phosphodiamidate morpholino oligomers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.47:3233-3239.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Gewirtz, A. M., D. L. Sokol, and M. Z. Ratajczak. 1998. Nucleic acid therapeutics: state of the art and future prospects. Blood92:712-736.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Good, L., and P. E. Nielsen. 1998. Antisense inhibition of gene expression in bacteria by PNA targeted to mRNA. Nat. Biotechnol.16:355-358.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Good, L., S. K. Awasthi, R. Dryselius, O. Larsson, and P. E. Nielsen. 2001. Bactericidal antisense effects of peptide-PNA conjugates. Nat. Biotechnol.19:360-364.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Harth, G., P. C. Zamecnik, J. Y. Tang, D. Tabatadze, and M. A. Horwitz. 2000. Treatment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with antisense oligonucleotides to glutamine synthetase mRNA inhibits glutamine synthetase activity, formation of the poly-l-glutamate/glutamine cell wall structure and bacterial replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA97:418-423.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Harth, G., M. A. Horwitz, D. Tabatadze, and P. C. Zamecnik. 2002. Targeting the Mycobacterium tuberculosis 30/32-kDa mycolyl transferase complex as therapeutic strategy against tuberculosis: proof of principle by using antisense technology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA99:15614-15619.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Heaton, M. P., and F. C. Neuhaus. 1994. Role of the d-alanyl carrier protein in the biosynthesis of d-alanyl-lipoteichoic acid. J. Bacteriol.176:681-690.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Issartel, J. P., V. Koronakis, and C. Hughes. 1991. Activation of Escherichia coli prohaemolysin to the mature toxin by acyl carrier protein-dependent fatty acylation. Nature351:759-761.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Ji, Y., B. Zhang, S. F. van Horn, P. Warren, G. Woodnutt, M. K. Burnham, and M. Rosenberg. 2001. Identification of critical staphylococcal genes using conditional phenotypes generated by antisense RNA. Science293:2266-2269.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Kurreck, J. 2003. Antisense Technologies: improvement through novel chemical modifications. Eur. J. Biochem.270:1628-1644.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    Laine V. J., D. S. Grass, and T. J. Nevalainen. 2000. Resistance of transgenic mice expressing human group II phospholipase A2 to Escherichia coli infection. Infect. Immun.68:87-92.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    Magnuson, K., S. Jackowski, C. O. Rock, and J. E. Cronan. 1993. Regulation of fatty acid biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Rev.57:522-542.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    Mohan, S., T. M. Kelly, S. S. Eveland, C. R. Raetz, and M. S. Anderson. 1994. An Escherichia coli gene (fabZ) encoding (3R)-hydroxymyristoyl acyl carrier protein dehydrase. Relation to fabA and suppression of mutations in lipid A biosynthesis. J. Biol. Chem.269:32896-32903.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    Nekhotiaeva, N., S. K. Awasthi, P. E. Nielsen, and L. Good. 2004. Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus gene expression and growth using antisense peptide nucleic acids. Mol. Ther.10:652-659.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    Rock, C. O., and J. E. Cronan. 1996. Escherichia coli as a model for the regulation of dissociable (type II) fatty acid biosynthesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1302:1-16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    Rumley, M. K., H. Therisod, A. C. Weissborn, and E. P. Kennedy. 1992. Mechanisms of regulation of the biosynthesis of membrane-derived oligosaccharides in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem.267:11806-11810.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    Sarno, R., H. Ha, N. Weinsetel, and M. E. Tolmasky. 2003. Inhibition of aminoglycoside 6′-N-acetyltransferase type Ib-mediated amikacin resistance by antisense oligodeoxynucleotides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.47:3296-3304.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    Schaefer, A. L., D. L. Val, B. L. Hanzelka, J. E. Cronan, Jr., and E. P. Greenberg. 1996. Generation of cell-to-cell signals in quorum sensing: acyl homoserine lactone synthase activity of a purified Vibrio fischeri Luxl protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA93:9505-9509.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    Shen, B., R. G. Summers, H. Gramajo, M. J. Bibb, and C. R. Hutchinson. 1992. Purification and characterization of the acyl carrier protein of the Streptomyces glaucescens tetracenomycin C polyketide synthase. J. Bacteriol.174:3818-3821.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    Somerville, J. E., Jr., L. Cassiano, and R. P. Darveau. 1999. Escherichia coli msbB gene as a virulence factor and a therapeutic target. Infect. Immun.67:6583-6590.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    Sugita-Konishi, Y., S. Shimura, T. Nishikawa, F. Sunaga, H. Naito, and Y. Suzuki. 2003. Effect of bisphenol A on non-specific immunodefenses against non-pathogenic Escherichia coli. Toxicol. Lett.136:217-227.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    Tan, X.-X., K. Rose, W. Margolin, and Y. Chen. 2004. DNA enzyme generated by a novel single-stranded DNA expression vector inhibits expression of the essential bacterial cell division gene ftsZ. Biochemistry43:1111-1117.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    Tan, X.-X., and Y. Chen. 2005. A novel genomic approach identifies bacterial DNA-dependent RNA polymerase as the target of an antibacterial oligodeoxynucleotide, RBL-1. Biochemistry44:6708-6714.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    Watson, J., M. Largen, and K. P. McAdam. 1978. Genetic control of endotoxic responses in mice. J. Exp. Med.147:39-49.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    Watson, J., R. Riblet, and B. A. Taylor. 1977. The response of recombination inbred strains of mice to bacterial lipopolysaccharides. J. Immunol.118:2088-2093.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    White, D. G., K. Maneewannakul, E. von Hofe, M. Zillman, W. Eisenberg, A. K. Field, and S. B. Levy. 1997. Inhibition of the multiple antibiotic resistance (mar) operon in Escherichia coli by antisense DNA analogs. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.41:2699-2704.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Peptide Nucleic Acid Antisense Oligomer as a Therapeutic Strategy against Bacterial Infection: Proof of Principle Using Mouse Intraperitoneal Infection
Xin-Xing Tan, Jeffrey K. Actor, Yin Chen
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jul 2005, 49 (8) 3203-3207; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.49.8.3203-3207.2005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Peptide Nucleic Acid Antisense Oligomer as a Therapeutic Strategy against Bacterial Infection: Proof of Principle Using Mouse Intraperitoneal Infection
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Peptide Nucleic Acid Antisense Oligomer as a Therapeutic Strategy against Bacterial Infection: Proof of Principle Using Mouse Intraperitoneal Infection
Xin-Xing Tan, Jeffrey K. Actor, Yin Chen
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jul 2005, 49 (8) 3203-3207; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.49.8.3203-3207.2005
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Acyl Carrier Protein
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Apoproteins
Escherichia coli Proteins
Oligonucleotides, Antisense
Peptide Nucleic Acids
Peritonitis

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596