Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Experimental Therapeutics

Establishment of a Superficial Skin Infection Model in Mice by Using Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes

Elisabeth Kugelberg, Tobias Norström, Thomas K. Petersen, Tore Duvold, Dan I. Andersson, Diarmaid Hughes
Elisabeth Kugelberg
1Department of Bacteriology, Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, S-171 82 Solna, Sweden
2Microbiology and Tumor Biology Center, Karolinska Institute, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tobias Norström
3Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Box 596, The Biomedical Center, Uppsala University, S-751 24 Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas K. Petersen
4LEO Pharma, DK-2750 Ballerup, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tore Duvold
4LEO Pharma, DK-2750 Ballerup, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dan I. Andersson
1Department of Bacteriology, Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, S-171 82 Solna, Sweden
2Microbiology and Tumor Biology Center, Karolinska Institute, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diarmaid Hughes
3Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Box 596, The Biomedical Center, Uppsala University, S-751 24 Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: diarmaid.hughes@icm.uu.se
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.49.8.3435-3441.2005
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

A new animal model for the purpose of studying superficial infections is presented. In this model an infection is established by disruption of the skin barrier by partial removal of the epidermal layer by tape stripping and subsequent application of the pathogens Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes. The infection and the infection route are purely topical, in contrast to those used in previously described animal models in mice, such as the skin suture-wound model, where the infection is introduced into the deeper layers of the skin. Thus, the present model is considered more biologically relevant for the study of superficial skin infections in mice and humans. Established topical antibiotic treatments are shown to be effective. The procedures involved in the model are simple, a feature that increases throughput and reproducibility. This new model should be applicable to the evaluation of novel antimicrobial treatments of superficial infections caused by S. aureus and S. pyogenes.

An important stage in testing the potential of chemicals as antimicrobial drug candidates is establishment of their effectiveness in an animal model system (12, 30). A useful animal model system should be clinically relevant, experimentally robust, ethically acceptable, and convenient to perform and should provide reliable and reproducible results. We report here on a new model in mice that fulfills these criteria. The tape-stripping model has been developed to test the effectiveness of topical antibiotic treatments of superficial skin infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus or Streptococcus pyogenes. S. aureus and S. pyogenes are the most common causative agents of primary skin infections in humans (11, 17).

The existing mouse models for topical treatment of skin infections are the burnt skin model (1, 32, 36) and the skin suture-wound model (5, 14). Either the bacteria are introduced into the skin by injection in a traumatized skin area, as in the burnt skin model, or a bacterium-impregnated nylon suture is implanted into an artificial wound (a scalpel incision through all skin layers), which is then sewn or stapled shut, as in the skin suture-wound model. The area of infection in these models is usually dorsally located to hinder grooming or cleaning by the animal itself. Antibiotics dissolved in cream or ointment can be applied to the wound during the course of the experiment. At the experimental end point, the animal is killed, the infected area of the skin is cut out, and the number of bacteria in the sample is assayed (1, 5, 14, 32, 36). These mouse models for skin infections have some disadvantages in relation to superficial infections. The burnt skin model has been developed for studying issues related to infections in burn patients and is ethically unacceptable from an animal welfare perspective for the study of localized skin infections, such as impetigo and erysipelas. The skin suture-wound model involves cutting into the deeper layers of the skin and is thus not clinically relevant to purely topical conditions. Here we describe a new mouse model for superficial infections, the tape-stripping model. In this model a way of entry for the infectious agent is created by stripping off the fur and epidermis in a region on the back of the mouse by successive applications of an adhesive bandage.

In the development of this model, we used S. aureus and S. pyogenes as the infectious agents. Both bacteria are endemic in human populations and are regarded as opportunistic bacteria, usually causing infections in children, immunocompromised patients, or patients suffering from the effects of medical surgery (11, 22, 35). S. aureus can be isolated from throat or nasal swab samples from approximately one-third of the population (2, 16, 26, 33, 34) and is also commonly found in the skin flora, together with related species, such as Staphylococcus epidermidis (6, 7). Topical infections due to S. aureus and S. pyogenes are clinically relevant and cause a variety of serious symptoms, including toxic shock syndrome and skin lesions (17, 31), that can progress to sepsis and systemic shock if they are left untreated (3, 10, 24). These bacterial species are also the most common causes of impetigo in humans (13, 17). The antibiotic used to test the model was 2% fusidic acid in ointment (FAO; Fucidin ointment). In vitro FAO shows high levels of activity against several gram-positive organisms and species of staphylococci in particular (19, 20, 23).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and growth media. Staphylococcus aureus FDA486 is a laboratory strain previously used to study wound infections in rats (25). Streptococcus pyogenes 301 is a clinical dermal infection isolate obtained from the University Hospital in Uppsala, Sweden. The Dry SPOT Streptococcal Grouping kit (DR0400 M; Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, United Kingdom) was used to determine the Lancefield type of the streptococcal strain. The streptococcal bacteria were grown overnight anaerobically at 37°C on defibrinated horse blood agar before they were tested according to the manufacturer's instructions. S. pyogenes 301 belongs to Lancefield serological group type A. The in vitro MICs of fusidic acid for these strains, as determined by Etest (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden), were as follows: S. aureus FDA486, 0.125 μg/ml and S. pyogenes 301, 4 μg/ml. S. aureus was grown in Luria broth and on Luria agar plates (Oxoid Ltd.). S. pyogenes was grown in Todd-Hewitt broth (Sigma Aldrich, Stockholm, Sweden) and on blood agar plates made by mixing 5% (wt/vol) defibrinated horse blood (National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden) with Luria agar. S. aureus was grown aerobically at 37°C, and S. pyogenes was grown anaerobically (10% CO2) at 37°C.

Tape-stripping infection model.Animal infection experiments were performed at the Microbiology and Tumor Biology Center, Karolinska Institute (Stockholm, Sweden), in accordance with institutional and national guidelines (ethical permit N154/02). Six- to 8-week-old female BALB/c mice (Taconic M&B, Ry, Denmark) were used for all experiments. The mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of 10 ml/kg of body weight of a 1:1:2 (vol/vol) mixture of Hypnorm (fentanyl/fluanisone; Janssen-Cilag Ltd., Saunderton, United Kingdom)-Dormicum (midazolam; Hoffman-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland)-distilled water. The fur was stripped from the mice with Tensoplast (Smith & Nephew Medical, Hull, United Kingdom), an elastic adhesive bandage. An area of ca. 2 cm2 was tape stripped. In order to standardize the degree of barrier disruption elicited by the tape stripping, the transepidermal water loss (TEWL) was measured by using a DermaLab TEWL probe (Cortex Technology, Hadsund, Denmark). Measurements were made according to the guidelines of the Standardization Group of the European Dermatitis Society (27). TEWL is calculated automatically and is expressed in g/m2 h. By tape stripping the back of the mice 7 to 10 times in succession, the TEWL reached approximately 70 g/m2 h. Following this procedure, the skin became visibly damaged and was characterized by reddening and glistening but no regular bleeding. Microscopically, this procedure resulted in the controlled removal of most of the epidermal layer, with only a few basal epidermal cells remaining. After stripping of the skin, a bacterial infection was initiated by placing on the skin a 5-μl droplet containing 107 cells concentrated from an overnight bacterial culture in stationary phase. In each experiment, a group of mice were killed 4 h after infection to control the infectious dose (Table 1). The mice were treated with FAO (LEO Pharma, Ballerup, Denmark) on a regular basis, as described here. This dose gave a significant reduction in the numbers of CFU in preliminary dose-finding studies (0.5%, 1%, and 2% fusidic acid) and is the dose recommended by the manufacturer for human use. The first application of antibiotic to the stripped skin of the mice was at 4 h postinfection. Thereafter, beginning at 16 h after the first treatment, additional antibiotic applications were made twice daily (in the morning and the evening, with an 8-h interval) for a period of 4 days. For each treatment 25 to 30 mg of ointment was applied (estimated by weighing the pellet of ointment on a spatula). After each day the ointment tube was weighed to determine the average amount of ointment used for each mouse. Two infection control groups were included for each experiment: one consisted of untreated mice and the other consisted of mice treated with placebo ointment. The placebo ointment was identical to FAO except for the lack of the 2% fusidic acid. For all experiments in which untreated or topically treated groups were included, the experiments were terminated 18 h after the last topical treatment in order to avoid carryover effects in vitro. The addition of fucidinase (2.5 units per sample) to the homogenized samples did not influence the numbers of CFU, showing that 18 h is sufficient to avoid a carryover effect. Immediately after the mice were killed, the wounds, approximately 2 cm2, were excised and homogenized together with 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline in stomacher lab system bags by using a Stomacher 80 machine (Seward Ltd., Thetford, United Kingdom) set at 260 strokes per min for 120 s. The homogenates were washed once in phosphate-buffered saline to decrease the concentration of ointment. Suitable dilutions of the homogenates were plated on Luria agar (S. aureus) or blood agar (S. pyogenes) plates to determine the number of living bacteria (CFU). In order to investigate the reproducibility of the infection with S. aureus and S. pyogenes, three independent experiments that included untreated and placebo-treated groups were performed. In each experiment the mean CFU was calculated by using log10-transformed data. Based on the averages of these three experiments, the mean, range, and coefficient of variation were calculated.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Bacterial counts obtained in the various treatment groups

Suture-wound model.The established skin suture-wound model was carried out as described previously (14).

Histological examinations.In order to characterize the histopathology of the model, biopsy specimens were taken after the following treatments: immediately after tape stripping, 4 days after tape stripping, and 4 days after inoculation with S. aureus and S. pyogenes with and without treatment with placebo ointment. Immediately after the animals were killed, 5-mm punch biopsy specimens of excised skin were taken and immediately fixed in phosphate-buffered (pH 7.4) formalin (4%). The formalin-fixed biopsy specimens were embedded in paraffin and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. For identification of the bacteria, the biopsy specimens were stained with Gram's crystal violet solution (94448; Sigma-Aldrich). The following parameters and semiquantitative scoring system were used to describe the inflammatory response: for scoring of the inflammation (in the dermis, subcutis, muscular tissue, and connective tissues), 0, no inflammation present; 1, little inflammation present; 2, moderate inflammation present; and 3, severe inflammation present; for scoring of the presence of neutrophils, 0, no neutrophils present; 1, a few neutrophils present; 2, moderate occurrence of neutrophils; and 3, abundant occurrence of neutrophils; for scoring of the presence of mononuclear leukocytes, 0, no mononuclear leukocytes present; 1, a few mononuclear leukocytes present; 2, moderate occurrence of mononuclear leukocytes; and 3, abundant occurrence of mononuclear leukocytes; for scoring of presence of bacteria, 0, no bacteria; 1, scattered bacteria; 2, moderate numbers of bacteria; and 3, many large collections of bacteria. The observer was blinded to the treatments for all biopsy specimens.

Behavioral responses of mice.The mice were observed at least twice each day for signs of fatigue, stress, and aggressiveness. The mice were weighed before and after each experiment.

Statistical analysis.Statistical analysis of the log10-transformed data was performed to ensure variance homogeneity and normality. Thus, an analysis of variance (generalized linear models [8]) was applied, followed by four predefined pairwise treatment comparisons adjusted for multiplicity by the Bonferroni method (18), yielding a statistical ranking. Furthermore, to ensure robustness in the analysis performed, the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis approach (21) was used. The method showed no conclusive dissimilarities to the generalized linear models approach. All testing was performed on an overall 5% significance level, meaning that P values less than 0.05 were considered a statistically significant difference. All calculations and analyses were performed with SAS version 8.2 (SAS OnlineDoc; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Log10-transformed data are presented as the mean and standard deviation (SD) in Table 1, whereas actual values and corresponding median values are presented in the figures.

RESULTS

Establishment of staphylococcal infection.The number of CFU recoverable from the wound 4 h after application of 107 CFU of S. aureus FDA486 was 7.03 ± 0.37 log10 (Table 1). The different treatment regimens were begun after this initial 4-h period. There was no significant difference (P = 0.05) in the numbers of CFU per wound when 4 h versus 4 days of placebo treatment were compared (6.05 ± 0.31 log10). This is evidence of the successful establishment of a staphylococcal infection in this model. There was a slightly greater reduction in the numbers of CFU per wound that was statistically significant (P = 0.01) when 4 h versus 4 days of no treatment (5.89 ± 0.64 log10) were compared. The differences between the 4-day placebo treatment and 4 days of no treatment were not statistically significant (P = 1.00).

Effect of fusidic acid treatment on staphylococcal infection.Tape-stripped mice infected with S. aureus FDA486 were treated with FAO to test the efficacy of a topical antibiotic treatment in the new model (Fig. 1). Comparison of placebo (6.05 ± 0.31 log10) and FAO (4.68 ± 0.78 log10) treatment of the staphylococcal infection revealed a reduction in the numbers of CFU per wound that was statistically significant (P < 0.001).

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Tape-stripped mice infected with S. aureus FDA486. The number of bacteria (CFU) extracted from each mouse is represented by the symbol for the corresponding experimental group. The median value of the data for each group is shown as a horizontal bar. The number of mice in each experimental group was as follows: 4 h postinfection, n = 7; untreated, n = 8; placebo, n = 8; FAO, n = 12.

Establishment of streptococcal infection.The numbers of CFU recoverable from the wound 4 h after application of approximately 107 CFU of S. pyogenes 301 was 6.48 ± 0.29 log10 (Table 1). Comparison of the numbers of CFU after 4 h and 4 days of placebo treatment (6.15 ± 0.57 log10) revealed no significant difference (P = 1.00). In contrast, comparison of the numbers of CFU at 4 h and 4 days without treatment (3.21 ± 1.62 log10) revealed a significant reduction (P < 0.001). Comparison of the placebo and the untreated groups 4 days after infection confirmed the significance of the reduction in the numbers of CFU in the latter group (P < 0.001).

Effect of fusidic acid treatment on streptococcal infection.Comparison of placebo and fusidic acid treatments for the streptococcal infection (Fig. 2; Table 1) revealed a very significant effect (P < 0.001) of the antibiotic in clearing the infection. Thus, the mean CFU count after the 4-day FAO treatment (2.04 ± 1.31 log10) was reduced more than 4 log10 compared with that after the 4-day placebo treatment (6.15 ± 0.57 log10). Statistical comparison of the 4-day FAO treatment group and the 4-day untreated group showed that there was no significant difference (P > 0.05).

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Tape-stripped mice infected with S. pyogenes 301. The number of bacteria (CFU) extracted from each mouse is represented by the symbol for the corresponding experimental group. The median value of the data for each group is shown as a horizontal bar. The number of mice in each experimental group was as follows: 4 h postinfection, n = 16; untreated, n = 16; placebo, n = 16; FAO, n = 8.

Reproducibility of the model.The reproducibility of the model was assessed in three independent experiments, each of which included both S. aureus and S. pyogenes, with untreated and placebo-treated mice. The coefficients of variance (CVs) for the untreated mice were 18% (mean, 6.09 log10; SD, 1.10 log10) for those infected with S. aureus and 36% (mean, 3.96 log10; SD, 1.41 log10) for those infected with S. pyogenes. The CVs for the placebo-treated mice were 30% (mean, 6.21 log10; SD, 1.86) for those infected with S. aureus and 12% (mean, 6.62 log10; SD, 0.81 log10) for those infected with S. pyogenes.

Histological examination of infected and noninfected mice.The results for the scores of the inflammatory response, infiltrating neutrophils and mononuclear leukocytes, and the presence of bacteria are presented in Table 2. The tape-stripping procedure removed most of the epidermis, although a single layer of epidermal cells or scattered epidermal cells remained. Most of the remaining epidermal cells were necrotic. A minimal inflammatory response was evident immediately after tape stripping, and except for the missing epidermis, the skin appeared normal. Four days after tape stripping an acute subcutaneous phlegmonous inflammation with fibrin deposition and edema was observed with the infiltration of a few neutrophils. The inflammation was most pronounced in the subcutaneous and connective tissues. Inoculation of both S. aureus and S. pyogenes induced a late stage of subcutaneous fibrinoid necrosis after 4 days, with a few neutrophils mainly seen as nuclear dust deep in the subcutis (Fig. 3). In addition to neutrophils, the inflammatory cell infiltrate consisted of mononuclear cells, including lymphocytes and histiocytes. The inflammatory response was most intense in the subcutaneous tissues. For both mice infected with S. aureus and mice infected with S. pyogenes, the presence of bacteria (Fig. 4) was less evident in the untreated mice than in placebo-treated mice and the skin appeared dry compared to the skin of the placebo-treated mice. In some of the infected animals, fibrosis and remarkable regeneratory changes were observed in the subcutaneous tissue.

FIG.3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG.3.

Histological appearance of normal dorsal skin of mice (A; magnification, ×100) and Staphylococcus aureus-infected skin lesion (B, magnification, ×100; C [boxed area in panel B], magnification, ×200; D [boxed area in panel C], magnification, ×1,000) on day 4. Biopsy specimens were taken immediately after the termination of the experiment, fixed in formalin, and embedded in paraffin. The biopsy specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The inflammatory cell infiltrate consists of mononuclear cells, including lymphocytes, histiocytes, and, to lesser extent, neutrophils. The inflammatory response is associated with marked fibrosis, edema, and fibrin deposition. Coccoid bacteria are present. The epidermal layer is absent in the infected lesions. Numbered arrows indicate the following: 1, epidermis; 2, dermis; 3, muscular layer; 4, bacteria; 5, fibrin deposition; 6, inflammatory cell infiltrate.

FIG. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 4.

Staining of gram-positive bacteria in Staphylococcus aureus-infected skin (magnification, ×1,000) on day 4. Biopsy specimens were taken immediately after the termination of the experiment, fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin, and stained with Gram's crystal violet solution. Coccoid bacteria are present in the superficial layers of the dermis (arrows).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Scores for inflammatory response, infiltrating neutrophils and mononuclear leukocytes, and presence of bacteria

Behavioral responses of the mice.No abnormal behavioral patterns, such as fatigue, stress, or aggressiveness, were observed among the mice at any time during the course of these experiments. The mice gained, on average, 0.5 g of weight during the experiment, with no differences between the various test groups. A small fraction (2 of 48) of the mice displayed signs of deeper infections, with necrotized tissue and softening of the backbone skeletal structure (data not shown).

DISCUSSION

We have established a new model for superficial skin infections caused by S. aureus and S. pyogenes which we suggest to be a relevant and useful model for localized skin infections in humans. In contrast to previously described models for skin infection (1, 5, 14, 32, 36), the infection route in our model is topical. Partial removal of the epidermal layer of the skin allowed both S. aureus and S. pyogenes to colonize the skin and to elicit a profound inflammatory response. TEWL, which is a measure of skin barrier integrity, was used in order to ensure that the same degree of barrier disruption was achieved in all the mice and, thereby, to increase the reproducibility of the model.

The infection was maintained throughout the 4-day duration of the experiment (placebo groups). Thus, in the placebo groups, from an initial infection with 107 bacteria of either species, the number of CFU recovered from each wound dropped by less than 1 log10 over the course of the 4-day treatment. Topical treatment with FAO significantly reduced the numbers of S. aureus and S. pyogenes CFU recoverable after the 4-day treatment (Fig. 1 and 2; Table 1), showing that an established topical treatment is effective in the model. For both S. aureus and S. pyogenes, the numbers of recoverable CFU were different when the mice were left untreated for 4 days and when the mice were left untreated for 4 h (Table 1). For S. aureus this number was significantly higher (1.2 log10; P < 0.001) than that for the fusidic acid-treated group. For S. pyogenes the number of bacteria was also 1.2 log10 higher in the untreated groups than in the fusidic acid-treated animals, although this difference was not significantly different (P > 0.05). A plausible explanation for this is that S. pyogenes grows best under microanaerobic conditions (17) and that such conditions are more closely approximated by the presence of ointment in this assay. The genetic background of the BALB/c mice may also explain the reduced number of streptococci in the untreated group, as BALB/c mice have been shown to be much more resistant to group A streptococci than C3H/HeN mice (15). However, the use of more susceptible mouse strains may lead to an unacceptably high mortality rate, as observed in C3H/HeN when they are exposed to streptococci. In our model, BALB/c mice were used because the dominating agent in superficial infections, S. aureus (11, 17), colonized these mice well. BALB/c mice are also considered relevant because they respond immunologically to the superantigens (staphylococcal enterotoxin B) produced by S. aureus (29).

A pronounced and significant reduction in the numbers of CFU was achieved following 4 days of treatment with FAO. However, complete eradication of the staphylococci and streptococci was not reached after 4 days of treatment. This was expected, as superficial infections normally should be treated for 7 to 10 days in order to obtain a successful outcome (13). The fact that the infection was not cleared after this time allows the model to be used to compare various antimicrobial treatments with FAO.

Histologically, inoculation with S. aureus and S. pyogenes induced a pronounced acute inflammatory response characterized by the presence of neutrophils, lymphocytes, histiocytes, and fibrin deposition. The inflammatory response included most of the layers of the skin. Considering the histology of the infection caused by the staphylococci and streptococci, it most resembles that of human erysipelas, except that our model lacks the epidermal layer. Erysipelas is an acute bacterial infection of the dermis and subcutaneous tissues that is associated with clinical inflammation. Erysipelas is generally caused by group A streptococci (4). The model has less resemblance to the histology of impetigo, which is a contagious superficial pyogenic infection of the skin caused by S. aureus and S. pyogenes. In impetigo, the epidermis splits just below the stratum granulosum and large subcorneal pustules are formed, and these may also contain bacteria. The upper dermis contains an inflammatory infiltrate of neutrophils and lymphocytes (9). In our murine model, the formation of subcorneal pustules does not occur. We propose that our model would be a relevant disease model for localized skin structure infections caused by S. aureus or S. pyogenes, which can occur following skin barrier disruption.

The disruption of the barrier by using tape stripping resulted in a homogeneous removal of the upper epidermal layers in all the biopsy specimens examined immediately after tape stripping. Considering the numbers of CFU, the reproducibility of the model is acceptable, in that it has CVs that ranged from 12% to 36%, depending on the strain and the treatment.

The tape-stripping model presented here is relatively painless and nonintrusive for the animal. It is technically quick and simple to perform, with only a few uncomplicated steps involved in preparing the animals for treatment. In the process of validating this new model, we also performed some preliminary experiments using the established skin suture-wound model (14). In our hands, the throughput time per mouse (the total time taken to prepare a wound and inoculate it with bacteria) was approximately 2 min for the tape-stripping model, whereas it was at least 20 min for the skin suture-wound model. The reduction in the time required to process each animal by use of the tape-stripping model relative to that required by use of the skin suture-wound model provides a significant advantage when one is dealing with many animals. Considering the reduction of the numbers of CFU following treatment with FAO, the efficacy of fusidic acid is in agreement with those detected in previous investigations of FAO, e.g., by use of the skin suture-wound model (14, 28). Also, the variability in the model appears to be comparable to that detected in previous studies with the skin suture-wound model (14).

In conclusion, partial removal of the epidermal layer of BALB/c mouse skin by tape stripping allows S. aureus and S. pyogenes to colonize the skin, and this colonization is associated with an inflammatory host response, as determined by histology. Infections with both S. aureus and S. pyogenes can be treated by topical administration of FAO. The model is simple and reproducible and can be used for the evaluation of new antibiotic treatments for superficial skin infections. The model may also be advantageous for studies of the mechanisms involved in superficial skin infections.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge financial support from the Swedish Research Council (to D.I.A. and D.H.), the Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease control (to D.I.A.), the EU (to D.H.), and LEO Pharma (to D.I.A. and D.H.).

Dorthe Sandvang and Niels Frimodt-Møller, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, are gratefully acknowledged for their help in preparing samples for histological analysis. Jonas Wiedemann, LEO Pharma, is acknowledged for helpful assistance with the statistical analysis.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 9 August 2004.
    • Returned for modification 18 September 2004.
    • Accepted 27 April 2005.
  • Copyright © 2005 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Akiyama, H., H. Kanzaki, Y. Abe, J. Tada, and J. Arata. 1994. Staphylococcus aureus infection on experimental croton oil-inflamed skin in mice. J. Dermatol. Sci.8:1-10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Alghaithy, A. A., N. E. Bilal, M. Gedebou, and A. H. Weily. 2000. Nasal carriage and antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from hospital and non-hospital personnel in Abha, Saudi Arabia. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg.94:504-507.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Alouf, J. E., and H. Muller-Alouf. 2003. Staphylococcal and streptococcal superantigens: molecular, biological and clinical aspects. Int. J. Med. Microbiol.292:429-440.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Bonnetblanc, J. M., and C. Bedane. 2003. Erysipelas: recognition and management. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol.4:157-163.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Boon, R. J., and A. S. Beale. 1987. Response of Streptococcus pyogenes to therapy with amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid in a mouse model of mixed infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.31:1204-1209.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Brook, I. 2002. Microbiology of polymicrobial abscesses and implications for therapy. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.50:805-810.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Brook, I. 2002. Secondary bacterial infections complicating skin lesions. J. Med. Microbiol.51:808-812.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Brown, H., and R. Prescott. 1999. Applied mixed models in medicine. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, United Kingdom.
  9. 9.↵
    Champion, R. H., J. L. Burton, and F. J. G. Ebling. 1992. Textbook of dermatology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  10. 10.↵
    Chang, F. Y., J. E. Peacock, Jr., D. M. Musher, P. Triplett, B. B. MacDonald, J. M. Mylotte, A. O'Donnell, M. M. Wagener, and V. L. Yu. 2003. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: recurrence and the impact of antibiotic treatment in a prospective multicenter study. Medicine (Baltimore)82:333-339.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Chiller, K., B. A. Selkin, and G. J. Murakawa. 2001. Skin microflora and bacterial infections of the skin. J. Investig. Dermatol. Symp. Proc.6:170-174.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Craig, W. 1993. Relevance of animal models for clinical treatment. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.12(Suppl. 1):S55-S57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    George, A., and G. Rubin. 2003. A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatments for impetigo. Br. J. Gen. Pract.53:480-487.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Gisby, J., and J. Bryant. 2000. Efficacy of a new cream formulation of mupirocin: comparison with oral and topical agents in experimental skin infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.44:255-260.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Goldmann, O., G. S. Chhatwal, and E. Medina. 2003. Immune mechanisms underlying host susceptibility to infection with group A streptococci. J. Infect. Dis.187:854-861.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Grundmann, H., A. Tami, S. Hori, M. Halwani, and R. Slack. 2002. Nottingham Staphylococcus aureus population study: prevalence of MRSA among elderly people in the community. BMJ324:1365-1366.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Guay, D. R. 2003. Treatment of bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Expert Opin. Pharmacother.4:1259-1275.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    Hochberg, Y., and A. C. Tanmhane. 1987. Multiple comparison procedures. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, United Kingdom.
  19. 19.↵
    Hurdle, J. G., A. J. O'Neill, and I. Chopra. 2004. Anti-staphylococcal activity of indolmycin, a potential topical agent for control of staphylococcal infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.54:549-552.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    Kim, H. B., H.-C. Jang, H. J. Nam, Y. S. Lee, B. S. Kim, W. B. Park, K. D. Lee, Y. J. Choi, S. W. Park, M.-D. Oh, E.-C. Kim, and K. W. Choe. 2004. In vitro activities of 28 antimicrobial agents against Staphylococcus aureus isolates from tertiary-care hospitals in Korea: a nationwide survey. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.48:1124-1127.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    Lehmann, E. L. 1975. Nonparametrics. McGraw-Hill International Book Company, New York, N.Y.
  22. 22.↵
    Manders, S. M. 1998. Toxin-mediated streptococcal and staphylococcal disease. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.39:383-398.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Mason, B. W., and A. J. Howard. 2004. Fusidic acid resistance in community isolates of methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and the use of topical fusidic acid: a retrospective case-control study. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents23:300-303.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    McCormick, J. K., J. M. Yarwood, and P. M. Schlievert. 2001. Toxic shock syndrome and bacterial superantigens: an update. Annu. Rev. Microbiol.55:77-104.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    Nagaev, I., J. Bjorkman, D. I. Andersson, and D. Hughes. 2001. Biological cost and compensatory evolution in fusidic acid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Microbiol.40:433-439.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    Perl, T. M., and J. E. Golub. 1998. New approaches to reduce Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial infection rates: treating S. aureus nasal carriage. Ann. Pharmacother.32:S7-S16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    Pinnagoda, J., R. A. Tupker, T. Agner, and J. Serup. 1990. Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis22:164-178.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Roholt, I. 1992. Comparative efficacy of sodium fusidate ointment and two formulations of mupiricin ointment against experimentally induced wound infections in mice. Curr. Ther. Res.51:390-395.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.↵
    Saloga, J., and J. Knop. 1999. Superantigens in skin diseases. Eur. J. Dermatol.9:586-590.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Soriano, F., L. Aguilar, and C. Ponte. 1997. In vitro antibiotic sensitivity testing breakpoints and therapeutic activity in induced infections in animal models. J. Chemother.9(Suppl. 1):36-46.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    Spelman, D. 1999. Fusidic acid in skin and soft tissue infections. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents12(Suppl. 2):S59-S66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    Stieritz, D. D., A. Bondi, D. McDermott, and E. D. Michaels. 1982. A burned mouse model to evaluate anti-Pseudomonas activity of topical agents. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.9:133-140.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    Uehara, Y., H. Nakama, K. Agematsu, M. Uchida, Y. Kawakami, A. S. Abdul Fattah, and N. Maruchi. 2000. Bacterial interference among nasal inhabitants: eradication of Staphylococcus aureus from nasal cavities by artificial implantation of Corynebacterium sp. J. Hosp. Infect.44:127-133.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    Uemura, E., S. Kakinohana, N. Higa, C. Toma, and N. Nakasone. 2004. Comparative chracterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from throats and noses of healthy volunteers. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis.57:21-24.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    Wilcox, M. H., J. Hall, H. Pike, P. A. Templeton, W. N. Fawley, P. Parnell, and P. Verity. 2003. Use of perioperative mupirocin to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) orthopaedic surgical site infections. J. Hosp. Infect.54:196-201.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    Yamakawa, T., J. Mitsuyama, and K. Hayashi. 2002. In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activity of T-3912, a novel non-fluorinated topical quinolone. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.49:455-465.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Establishment of a Superficial Skin Infection Model in Mice by Using Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes
Elisabeth Kugelberg, Tobias Norström, Thomas K. Petersen, Tore Duvold, Dan I. Andersson, Diarmaid Hughes
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jul 2005, 49 (8) 3435-3441; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.49.8.3435-3441.2005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Establishment of a Superficial Skin Infection Model in Mice by Using Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Establishment of a Superficial Skin Infection Model in Mice by Using Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes
Elisabeth Kugelberg, Tobias Norström, Thomas K. Petersen, Tore Duvold, Dan I. Andersson, Diarmaid Hughes
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jul 2005, 49 (8) 3435-3441; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.49.8.3435-3441.2005
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Disease Models, Animal
Skin Diseases, Bacterial
Staphylococcal Skin Infections
Staphylococcus aureus
Streptococcal Infections
Streptococcus pyogenes

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596