Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Susceptibility

Molecular Characteristics and In Vitro Susceptibility to Antimicrobial Agents, Including the Des-Fluoro(6) Quinolone DX-619, of Panton-Valentine Leucocidin-Positive Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from the Community and Hospitals

Tatsuo Yamamoto, Soshi Dohmae, Kohei Saito, Taketo Otsuka, Tomomi Takano, Megumi Chiba, Katsuko Fujikawa, Mayumi Tanaka
Tatsuo Yamamoto
1Division of Bacteriology, Department of Infectious Disease Control and International Medicine, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tatsuoy@med.niigata-u.ac.jp
Soshi Dohmae
1Division of Bacteriology, Department of Infectious Disease Control and International Medicine, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kohei Saito
1Division of Bacteriology, Department of Infectious Disease Control and International Medicine, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Taketo Otsuka
1Division of Bacteriology, Department of Infectious Disease Control and International Medicine, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tomomi Takano
1Division of Bacteriology, Department of Infectious Disease Control and International Medicine, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Megumi Chiba
2Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katsuko Fujikawa
2Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mayumi Tanaka
2Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00847-06
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Highly virulent, community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains with Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL) genes have been found increasingly worldwide. Among a total of 2,101 MRSA strains isolated from patients in hospitals in Japan, two were positive for PVL genes. One strain was identified as a community-acquired MRSA strain with genotype sequence type 30 (ST30) and spa (staphylococcal protein A gene) type 19 from Japan and was resistant only to β-lactam antimicrobial agents. The other strain was closely related to PVL+ multidrug-resistant, hospital-acquired MRSA strains (ST30, spa type 43) derived from nosocomial outbreaks in the 1980s to 1990s in Japan but with a divergent sequence type, ST765 (a single-locus variant of ST30). Twenty-two PVL+ MRSA strains, including those from Japan and those from other countries with various sequence types (ST1, ST8, ST30, ST59, and ST80) and genotypes, were examined for susceptibility to 31 antimicrobial agents. Among the agents, DX-619, a des-fluoro(6) quinolone, showed the greatest activity, followed by rifampin and sitafloxacin, a fluoroquinolone. The data suggest that DX-619 exhibits a superior activity against PVL+ MRSA strains with various virulence genetic traits from the community as well as from hospitals.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), alternatively called hospital-acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA), has been a major cause of nosocomial infections since 1961 (5). Besides this, since 1997 to 1999 (6), infection due to new highly virulent MRSA, called community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA), has become a major concern worldwide (52, 56). CA-MRSA infection is associated with skin and soft tissue infection in young, otherwise healthy people (33, 52, 56) and with more severe diseases, such as osteomyelitis or necrotizing pneumonia (preceded by influenza or influenza-like prodromes) (11, 16, 56).

CA-MRSA carries genes for Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL) (52, 56), which causes apoptosis and necrosis in human polymorphonuclear cells (19), and possesses limited types of methicillin resistance locus (staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec [SCCmec]), such as SCCmecIV or SCCmecV (10, 52, 56). There are geographically two types of CA-MRSA: one being rather continent specific (e.g., multilocus sequence type 1 [ST1] and ST8, found mostly in the United States, and ST80, found mostly in Europe [30, 52]) and the other worldwide (ST30, found in the United States, Europe, Oceania, Japan, and Brazil [12, 31, 41, 48, 52]). CA-MRSA is also isolated from hospitals (2, 37, 44).

In Japan, MRSA strains at the time of nosocomial outbreaks (“hospital MRSA panics”) in the late 1980s and early 1990s were largely PVL+ (49). In this study, we surveyed and characterized PVL+ strains of MRSA isolated from patients in hospitals. We also examined the in vitro susceptibilities of PVL+ MRSA strains, including those isolated in this study and (with various sequence types) from other countries, to 31 antimicrobial agents, including DX-619, a des-fluoro(6) [des-F(6)] quinolone, and sitafloxacin, a fluoroquinolone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains.A total of 2,101 MRSA strains isolated from patients in hospitals in Japan from 1996 through 2002 by a levofloxacin surveillance group (led by Keizo Yamaguchi) were examined for PVL genes in this study. CA-MRSA ST30 strains used included SCCmecIVc strains NN1, NN12, NN31A, and NN31D isolated from Japan (48) and HT20030336 isolated from The Netherlands and SCCmecIVa strains USA1100 isolated from the United States (30) and HT20010466 isolated from Australia. PVL+ MRSA ST30 strains 80s-1 (SCCmecIVx; x, subtype unknown), 80s-2 (SCCmecIVc), 80s-3 (SCCmecIVa), 80s-4 (SCCmecIVa), 90s-1 (SCCmecIVx), and 90s-2 (SCCmecIVc) were isolated from “hospital MRSA panics” in the 1980s or 1990s in Japan (49). PVL-positive CA-MRSA strains with sequence types other than ST30 used included strains USA400 (MW2; ST1, SCCmecIVa), USA300 (ST8, SCCmecIVa), and USA1000 (ST59, SCCmecIV) from the United States; strains SSF17 (ST59, SCCmecIV) and Ce7 (ST59) from Taiwan; strain HT20030345 (ST80) from The Netherlands; and strain HT20030442 (ST80) from France. Strains HT20030336, HT20010466, HT20030345, and HT20030442 were kindly provided by Jerome Etienne; strains US1100, USA400, USA300, and USA1000 by L. K. McDougal and L. L. McDonald; and strains SSF17 and Ce7 by Ma Ling and Leung K. Siu as strains representative of different sequence types.

Media and bacterial growth.For bacterial growth, we used LB broth (Difco, Sparks, MD), which was inoculated and incubated at 37°C to log phase with agitation, as the liquid medium. Nutrient agar (Eiken Chemical, Tokyo) was used as the solid medium.

Molecular typing.Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was performed using seven housekeeping genes, as previously described (13). An allelic profile (allele number) was obtained from the MLST website (http://www.mlst.net/ ), and the ST data were further analyzed using eBURST software (14) to determine a clonal complex to which each ST belonged. spa (staphylococcal protein A gene) typing was performed as previously described (46). The spa type was determined using a public spa type database (http://tools.egenomics.com/ ). Detection of the accessory gene regulator (agr) allele group was done by PCR with the reported primers, as previously described (47). The SCCmec types (I to V) were analyzed by PCR as previously described (38) by use of reference strains. In the case of SCCmecIV, three subtypes (IVa, IVb, and IVc) were further analyzed by PCR with the reported primers, as previously described (24).

Virulence gene analysis.Forty-one staphylococcal virulence genes were detected by PCR using the previously reported primers. The targeted genes were three leucocidin genes (26, 34), five hemolysin genes (26), 16 staphylococcal enterotoxin genes (3, 23, 25, 39, 57), one putative staphylococcal enterotoxin gene (28), three exfoliative toxin genes (3, 55), an exotoxin-like gene cluster (54), the epidermal cell differentiation inhibitor gene (26), and 14 adhesin genes (32, 40, 50, 51, 53).

Drug resistance gene analysis.Resistance genes were detected by PCR. They included genes for penicillin resistance (29), aminoglycoside resistance (7, 8, 29), and macrolide and lincosamide resistance (29).

Coagulase typing.MRSA and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus strains were examined for coagulase type by use of a staphylococcal coagulase antiserum kit (Denka Seiken, Tokyo, Japan) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

PFGE and computer analysis.For pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis, total bacterial DNA was extracted from MRSA or methicillin-susceptible S. aureus strains and digested with SmaI (21). The digested DNA was applied on PFGE (1.2% agarose). Computer-assisted analysis of the PFGE patterns was performed using a program called Molecular Analyst Finger Printing PLUS (Bio-Rad, Tokyo, Japan), according to a clustering algorithm for the unweighted-pair group method using average linkages (36).

Plasmid analysis.Plasmid DNA was isolated using a QIAGEN Plasmid Midi kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) and lysostaphin (Wako Pure Chemicals, Osaka, Japan) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Plasmid DNA was then introduced into S. aureus RN2677 (49) by electroporation using a Gene Pulser II electroporator (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, RN2677 cells were grown at 37°C in brain heart infusion broth (Difco) to log phase (optical density at 600 nm of 0.3). Bacterial cells from 100 ml of culture were harvested, washed with 40 ml of cold sterilized water twice, and suspended in 10 ml of cold 10% (vol/vol) glycerol and finally in 0.5 ml of cold 10% (vol/vol) glycerol. Competent cells (50 μl) thus made were mixed with 1 μl of plasmid DNA, and the mixture was subjected to electroporation in a 0.2-cm electrode spacing cuvette (Bio-Rad) (setting, 100 Ω, 2.5 kV, 25 μF). One milliliter of brain heart infusion broth was then added, and the mixture was incubated for 90 min at 37°C. Resistance plasmid-containing clones were selected on agar plates containing cadmium acetate at 10 μg/ml, kanamycin at 10 μg/ml, or erythromycin at 10 μg/ml. Plasmid was isolated using a QIAGEN Plasmid Midi kit (QIAGEN) and lysostaphin (Wako Pure Chemicals) according to the instructions of the manufacturer and analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis.

Antimicrobial agents.DX-619, a novel des-F(6) quinolone (17), and sitafloxacin, a novel fluoroquinolone (1), were described previously. Other antimicrobial agents were gifts from their manufacturers.

Susceptibility testing.Susceptibility testing of bacterial strains was done by agar dilution method with Mueller-Hinton agar (Difco) according to previously described procedures (9, 35). The final concentrations of antimicrobial agents ranged from 0.001 to 128 μg/ml.

RESULTS

Isolation of PVL+ MRSA.Among a total of 2,101 MRSA strains examined, two were PVL+ (0.1%). One strain (strain EB00449) was isolated from the pus of an outpatient (male) aged 27 years in 2002. The other strain (strain DB00319) was isolated from centesis of an inpatient (male) aged 61 years in 2000.

Characteristics of PVL+ MRSA.To investigate the evolutionary relationships and the characteristics of virulence and drug resistance, strains EB00449 and DB00319 were examined for genotypes, virulence genes, penicillinase (PCase) plasmids, and drug resistance genes (Table 1). Strain EB00449 belonged to ST30, while strain DB00319 possessed a novel sequence type (ST765, a single-locus variant of the founder [ST30] of clonal complex 30 [CC30]). The two strains were also distinguishable from each other in terms of spa type, i.e., spa type 19 for EB00449 and spa type 43 for DB00319. In addition, EB00449 was negative for hlb (which codes for β-hemolysin), sea (which codes for staphylococcal enterotoxin A), and icaA (which codes for biofilm formation), while DB00319 was positive for hlb, sea, and icaA.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Characteristics of PVL+ MRSA strains isolated in this study compared with characteristics of nosocomial-outbreak-derived PVL+ MRSA ST30 strains and PVL+ CA-MRSA ST30 strains from Japan and CA-MRSA ST30 strains from other countriesa

Moreover, EB00449 was resistant only to β-lactam antimicrobial agents and carried a 32-kb simple PCase plasmid coding for resistance to ampicillin (and penicillin G) and cadmium (Table 1; Fig. 1); EB00449 carried an additional, 46-kb plasmid of unknown function (Fig. 1). In contrast, DB00319 was resistant to multiple drugs and carried a 44-kb multidrug-resistant PCase plasmid coding for resistance not only to ampicillin (and penicillin G) and cadmium but also to kanamycin, streptomycin, erythromycin, and clindamycin (Table 1; Fig. 1); DB00319 carried an additional, 5.4-kb plasmid of unknown function (Fig. 1).

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Plasmid analysis of PVL+ MRSA strains DB00319 and EB00449 and S. aureus RN2677 carrying a PCase plasmid. Plasmid DNA from each bacterial strain was electrophoresed in 0.7% agarose. Lanes: 1, strain DB00319; 2, RN2677 carrying a PCase plasmid (pAC00s7) from strain DB00319; 3, strain EB00449; 4, RN2677 carrying a PCase plasmid (pAC00s8) from strain EB00449; 5, RN2677 (strain without plasmid). Plasmid sizes were determined by using reference plasmids with known molecular sizes. The plasmid sizes thus determined are indicated to the left of the gel.

The data for strains EB00449 and DB00319 were compared with data for PVL+ MRSA strains (strains 80s-1 to -4 and 90s-1 and -2) isolated during the nosocomial outbreaks in the 1980s and 1990s, recent PVL+ CA-MRSA strains (strains NN1 and NN12) from Japan, and PVL+ CA-MRSA ST30 strains from other countries (Table 1). Strain EB00449 was very similar to PVL+ CA-MRSA strain NN1 from Japan; there was a divergence in that EB00449 carried an additional 46-kb plasmid compared with NN1, which carried only PCase plasmid. Moreover, DB00319 closely resembled nosocomial-outbreak-derived PVL+ HA-MRSA strains, especially strain 90s-1, except for the sequence type.

Cluster analysis of PFGE patterns.A computer-assisted comparison of PFGE patterns obtained with PVL+ HA-MRSA strains (80s-1 to -4 and 90s-1 and -2) isolated during the nosocomial outbreaks in the 1980s and 1990s, strains DB00319 and EB00449, recent PVL+ CA-MRSA strains (NN1 and NN12) from Japan, and PVL+ CA-MRSA ST30 strains from other countries is shown in Fig. 2. Consistent with the spa typing, PVL+ HA-MRSA and DB00319 (spa type 43) strains constituted subclusters, which were distinguished from subclusters of PVL+ CA-MRSA and EB00449 (spa type 19 or 654) strains.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

PFGE analysis of PVL+ MRSA strains (DB00319 and EB00449) isolated in this study, nosocomial-outbreak-derived PVL+ MRSA ST30 strains (80s-1 to -4 and 90s-1 to -2) isolated in the 1980s and 1990s, PVL+ CA-MRSA ST30 strains (NN1 and NN12) from Japan, and PVL+ CA-MRSA ST30 strains (USA1100, HT20030336, and HT20010466) from other countries (right side) and dendrogram constructed by computer-assisted comparison (left side). The characteristics of each bacterial strain are listed in Table 1.

Characteristics of PVL+ MRSA strains not of ST30.Characteristics of global PVL+ MRSA strains belonging to U.S. sequence types (ST1 and ST8), a Taiwanese (or U.S.) sequence type (ST59), and a European sequence type (ST80) are summarized in Table 2. A remarkable difference in adhesive properties (genes) was observed between strains of ST30 and strains not of ST30. In contrast to ST30 strains, strains not of ST30 were negative for bbp (which codes for bone sialoprotein adhesin). Moreover, many strains not of ST30 (except for the U.S. ST1 strain) were negative for cna (which codes for collagen adhesin).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Characteristics of global PVL+ MRSA strains not of ST30

Regarding toxin genes, the U.S. strains (ST1 and ST8) were positive for sea, just like nosocomial-outbreak-derived PVL+ HA-MRSA strains from Japan. U.S. ST1 and European ST80 strains, but not ST8, ST30, or ST59 strains, were positive for seh.

In vitro susceptibility.Next, PVL+ MRSA strains (22 strains) were examined for susceptibility to 31 antimicrobial agents. They included the two strains DB00319 (ST765) and EB00449 (ST30), six PVL+ HA-MRSA (ST30) strains isolated from nosocomial outbreaks in the 1980s and 1990s, four PVL+ CA-MRSA (ST30) strains from Japan, and 10 PVL+ CA-MRSA (ST1, ST8, ST30, ST59, and ST80) strains from other countries. The data are summarized in Table 3.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

In vitro activities of DX-619 and other antimicrobial agents against PVL+ MRSA strainsa

DX-619 showed the greatest activity among the antimicrobial agents tested (MIC50, 0.008 μg/ml; MIC90, 0.008 μg/ml). This activity was followed by those of rifampin (MIC50, 0.008 μg/ml; MIC90, 0.016 μg/ml) and sitafloxacin or tosufloxacin (MIC50, 0.031 μg/ml; MIC90, 0.063 μg/ml). Sitafloxacin showed a better MIC range than tosufloxacin (0.016 to 0.125 μg/ml versus 0.016 to 0.25 μg/ml, respectively).

Gentamicin resistance (MICs, 8 to ≥256 μg/ml) was found only in Japanese PVL+ MRSA ST30 strains (in two of four PVL+ CA-MRSA strains, in five of six nosocomial-outbreak-derived PVL+ HA-MRSA strains, and in one [strain DB00319] of two PVL+ MRSA strains isolated in this study) (Tables 1, Table 2, and Table 3). Minocycline resistance (MIC, 8 μg/ml) was also found only in Japanese PVL+ MRSA ST30 strains (nosocomial-outbreak-derived PVL+ HA-MRSA strain 80s-1) (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3). Fusidic acid resistance (MIC, 8 μg/ml) was found only in European PVL+ CA-MRSA ST80 strains (Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3).

Resistance to some other drugs was distributed among different sequence types: kanamycin resistance (MICs, ≥256 μg/ml) among ST8, ST30, ST59, and ST80; streptomycin resistance (MICs, 128 to ≥256 μg/ml) among ST30, ST59, and ST80; erythromycin resistance (MICs, ≥256 μg/ml) among ST8, ST30, and ST59; clindamycin resistance (MICs, ≥256 μg/ml) among ST30 and ST59; and tetracycline resistance (MICs, ≥16 μg/ml) among ST1, ST8, ST30, ST59, and ST80.

DISCUSSION

PVL+ CA-MRSA strains in Japan are of a worldwide sequence type (ST30) (48). No cases of ST1 and ST8, found mainly in the United States (30, 52), ST80, found mainly in Europe (52), or ST59, found mainly in Taiwan and the United States (4, 12), have been found in Japan.

There were nosocomial MRSA outbreaks (“hospital MRSA panics”) in Japan in the late 1980s and early 1990s. At that time, decubitus, pneumonia, bacteremia, and postoperative MRSA enteritis were found frequently (18, 27, 45), but they have drastically decreased recently. Interestingly, MRSA strains isolated during the nosocomial outbreaks were largely PVL+ (49). Although these PVL+ HA-MRSA strains belonged to ST30, similarly to present PVL+ CA-MRSA strains, they had unique features (49), e.g., they exhibited spa type 43, possessed hlb, sea (which is associated with severity of infection [sepsis and shock] [15]), and icaA, were multidrug resistant, and carried a multidrug-resistant PCase plasmid, in contrast to present PVL+ CA-MRSA ST30 strains (spa type 19). The possibility of high virulence of hlb+sea+ multidrug-resistant PVL+ HA-MRSA strains remains to be clarified.

In this study, we further surveyed PVL+ MRSA strains from patients in hospitals, and two PVL+ MRSA strains were studied. One PVL+ MRSA strain, strain DB00319, from an inpatient aged 61 years, shared common features (CC30, spa type 43, hlb, sea, icaA, and multidrug-resistant PCase plasmid) with multidrug-resistant PVL+ HA-MRSA strains from the “hospital MRSA panics” but with a genetic divergence in sequence type (novel ST765). ST765 is a single-locus variant (single base substitution in tpi) of the founder type, ST30, of CC30. This suggests that a “hospital MRSA panic” clone continues to exist in hospitals in Japan, with a slight divergence.

The other PVL+ MRSA strain, strain EB00449, from an outpatient aged 27 years, was a PVL+ CA-MRSA ST30 strain. EB00449 was, however, slightly divergent in terms of plasmid profile from previously characterized PVL+ CA-MRSA ST30 strains, i.e., strain NN1, isolated from an infant (aged 11 months) with bullous impetigo (48), and strain NN12, carrying a conjugative drug resistance plasmid, isolated from a high school student (a basketball player aged 18 years) with bacteremia and osteomyelitis (40, 48). Thus far, PVL+ CA-MRSA ST30 strains found in Japan have been distributed among individuals below 30 years of age.

Both types of PVL+ MRSA strains of CC30 present in Japan, PVL+hlb+sea+ HA-MRSA ST30/765 spa type 43 strains (continuing from the 1980s) and PVL+ CA-MRSA spa type 19 strains (emerged in the community recently), are highly adhesive (bbp+ and cna+). bbp codes for bone sialoprotein adhesin, which leads to hematogenously spread osteomyelitis and arthritis (20, 42, 43). cna codes for collagen adhesin, which is correlated with pulmonary manifestations (22). Such highly adhesive characteristics may be a cause of continuous infection in hospitals and in the community in Japan.

Twenty-two PVL+ MRSA strains, including PVL+ HA-MRSA ST30/765 strains and recent PVL+ CA-MRSA ST30 strains from Japan and PVL+ CA-MRSA strains with various global sequence types (ST1, ST8, ST30, ST59, and ST80) from other countries, were examined for their susceptibilities to 31 antimicrobial agents. Some drug resistance is associated with sequence type, e.g., fusidic acid resistance with ST80 (52). In Japan, gentamicin has been widely used not only in hospitals but also in the community as an ointment for skin infection, and due to this, gentamicin-resistant PVL+ MRSA ST30/765 strains are notable.

Antimicrobial agents tested in this study included DX-619, a des-F(6) quinolone, which has shown an in vitro activity against gram-positive bacteria (17), and sitafloxacin, a fluoroquinolone (1). DX-619 showed the greatest activity against PVL+ MRSA among the antimicrobial agents tested (MIC90, 0.008 μg/ml; MIC50, 0.008 μg/ml). This activity was eightfold greater than that of sitafloxacin (MIC90, 0.063 μg/ml), 32-fold greater than that of levofloxacin (MIC90, 0.25 μg/ml), and 125-fold greater than that of vancomycin (MIC90, 1 μg/ml). It was even twofold greater than that of rifampin (MIC90, 0.016 μg/ml). Among fluoroquinolones tested, sitafloxacin showed the greatest activity, e.g., it showed a better MIC range than tosufloxacin (0.016 to 0.125 μg/ml versus 0.016 to 0.25 μg/ml, respectively).

The effects of DX-619 (or sitafloxacin) on severe diseases due to PVL+ CA-MRSA strains (such as bacteremia, osteomyelitis, or necrotizing pneumonia) remain to be investigated.

In conclusion, there exist two types of highly adhesive (bbp+cna+) PVL+ MRSA strains in Japan: hlb+sea+, multidrug-resistant HA-MRSA ST30/765 strains (spa type 43) (originating from “hospital MRSA panics”) and CA-MRSA ST30 strains (spa type 19) carrying or not carrying the conjugative drug resistance plasmid (emerged recently in the community). DX-619 showed higher activity than other anti-MRSA agents against those PVL+ MRSA strains as well as global PVL+ CA-MRSA strains with ST1, ST8, ST30, ST59, and ST80. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the anti-PVL+ MRSA activity of DX-619 (or sitafloxacin) in vivo, such as in animal infection models.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Jerome Etienne, L. K. McDougal, L. L. McDonald, Ma Ling, and Leung K. Siu for PVL+ MRSA strains.

This study was supported by a grant from Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 12 July 2006.
    • Returned for modification 17 August 2006.
    • Accepted 4 October 2006.
  • Copyright © 2006 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Akasaka, T., S. Kurosaka, Y. Uchida, M. Tanaka, K. Sato, and I. Hayakawa. 1998. Antibacterial activities and inhibitory effects of sitafloxacin (DU-6859a) and its optical isomers against type II topoisomerases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.42:1284-1287.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Andersen, B. M., K. Bergh, M. Steinbakk, G. Syversen, B. Magnaes, H. Dalen, and J. N. Bruun. 1999. A Norwegian nosocomial outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus resistant to fusidic acid and susceptible to other antistaphylococcal agents. J. Hosp. Infect.41:123-132.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Becker, K., R. Roth, and G. Peters. 1998. Rapid and specific detection of toxigenic Staphylococcus aureus: use of two multiplex PCR enzyme immunoassays for amplification and hybridization of staphylococcal enterotoxin genes, exfoliative toxin genes, and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 gene. J. Clin. Microbiol.36:2548-2553.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Boyle-Vavra, S., B. Ereshefsky, C.-C. Wang, and R. S. Daum. 2005. Successful multiresistant community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus lineage from Taipei, Taiwan, that carries either the novel staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec (SCCmec) type VT or SCCmec type IV. J. Clin. Microbiol.43:4719-4730.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Brumfitt, W., and J. Hamilton-Miller. 1989. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.N. Engl. J. Med.320:1188-1196.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1999. Four pediatric deaths from community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus—Minnesota and North Dakota, 1997-1999. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.48:707-710.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Choi, S. M., S. H. Kim, H. J. Kim, D. G. Lee, J. H. Choi, J. H. Yoo, J. H. Kang, W. S. Shin, and M. W. Kang. 2003. Multiplex PCR for the detection of genes encoding aminoglycoside modifying enzymes and methicillin resistance among Staphylococcus species. J. Korean Med. Sci.18:631-636.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Clark, N. C., O. Olsvik, J. M. Swenson, C. A. Spiegel, and F. C. Tenover. 1999. Detection of a streptomycin/spectinomycin adenylyltransferase gene (aadA) in Enterococcus faecalis.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.43:157-160.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2005. Performance standard for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 15th informational supplement. M100-S15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, Pa.
  10. 10.↵
    Coombs, G. W., G. R. Nimmo, J. M. Bell, F. Huygens, F. G. O'Brien, M. J. Malkowski, J. C. Pearson, A. J. Stephens, P. M. Giffard, and the Australian Group for Antimicrobial Resistance. 2004. Genetic diversity among community methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains causing outpatient infections in Australia. J. Clin. Microbiol.42:4735-4743.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Crum, N. F. 2005. The emergence of severe, community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Scand. J. Infect. Dis.37:651-656.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Diep, B. A., G. F. Sensabaugh, N. S. Somboona, H. A. Carleton, and F. Perdreau-Remington. 2004. Widespread skin and soft-tissue infections due to two methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains harboring the genes for Panton-Valentine leucocidin. J. Clin. Microbiol.42:2080-2084.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Enright, M. C., N. P. Day, C. E. Davies, S. J. Peacock, and B. G. Spratt. 2000. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus.J. Clin. Microbiol.38:1008-1015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Feil, E. J., B. C. Li, D. M. Aanensen, W. P. Hanage, and B. G. Spratt. 2004. eBURST: inferring patterns of evolutionary descent among clusters of related bacterial genotypes from multilocus sequence typing data. J. Bacteriol.186:1518-1530.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Ferry, T., D. Thomas, A. L. Genestier, M. Bes, G. Lina, F. Vandenesch, and J. Etienne. 2005. Comparative prevalence of superantigen genes in Staphylococcus aureus isolates causing sepsis with and without septic shock. Clin. Infect. Dis.41:771-777.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Francis, J. S., M. C. Doherty, U. Lopatin, C. P. Johnston, G. Sinha, T. Ross, M. Cai, N. N. Hansel, T. Perl, J. R. Ticehurst, K. Carroll, D. L. Thomas, E. Nuermberger, and J. G. Bartlett. 2005. Severe community-onset pneumonia in healthy adults caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying the Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes. Clin. Infect. Dis.40:100-107.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Fujikawa, K., M. Chiba, M. Tanaka, and K. Sato. 2005. In vitro antibacterial activity of DX-619, a novel des-fluoro(6) quinolone. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.49:3040-3045.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Fukayama, M., and T. Inamatsu. 1988. Current situation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in elderly patients. Clin. Microbiol.15:174-177. (In Japanese).
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    Genestier, A. L., M. C. Michallet, G. Prévost, G. Bellot, L. Chalabreysse, S. Peyrol, F. Thivolet, J. Etienne, G. Lina, F. M. Vallette, F. Vandenesch, and L. Genestier. 2005. Staphylococcus aureus Panton-Valentine leukocidin directly targets mitochondria and induces Bax-independent apoptosis of human neutrophils. J. Clin. Investig.115:3117-3127.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    Gillespie, W. J. 1990. Epidemiology in bone and joint infection. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am.4:361-376.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Goering, R. V., and M. A. Winters. 1992. Rapid method for epidemiological evaluation of gram-positive cocci by field inversion gel electrophoresis. J. Clin. Microbiol.30:577-580.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    Gonzalez, B. E., K. G. Hulten, M. K. Dishop, L. B. Lamberth, W. A. Hammerman, E. O. Mason., Jr., and S. L. Kaplan. 2005. Pulmonary manifestations in children with invasive community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus infection. Clin. Infect. Dis.41:583-590.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Holtfreter, S., K. Bauer, D. Thomas, C. Feig, V. Lorenz, K. Roschack, E. Friebe, K. Selleng, S. Lövenich, T. Greve, A. Greinacher, B. Panzig, S. Engelmann, G. Lina, and B. M. Bröker. 2004. egc-encoded superantigens from Staphylococcus aureus are neutralized by human sera much less efficiently than are classical staphylococcal enterotoxins or toxic shock syndrome toxin. Infect. Immun.72:4061-4071.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    Ito, T., K. Kuwahara, K. Hisata, K. Okuma, L. Cui, and K. Hiramatsu. 2004. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: current status and molecular epidemiological perspective. Kansenshogaku Zasshi78:459-469. (In Japanese.)
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Jarraud, S., G. Cozon, F. Vandenesch, M. Bes, J. Etienne, and G. Lina. 1999. Involvement of enterotoxins G and I in staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome and staphylococcal scarlet fever. J. Clin. Microbiol.37:2446-2449.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    Jarraud, S., C. Mougel, J. Thioulouse, G. Lina, H. Meugnier, F. Forey, X. Nesme, J. Etienne, and F. Vandenesch. 2002. Relationships between Staphylococcus aureus genetic background, virulence factors, agr groups (alleles), and human disease. Infect. Immun.70:631-641.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    Konishi, T. 1994. MRSA enteritis. Nippon RinshoSuppl. 6:45-48. (In Japanese.)
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Letertre, C., S. Perelle, F. Dilasser, and P. Fach. 2003. Identification of a new putative enterotoxin SEU encoded by the egc cluster of Staphylococcus aureus.J. Appl. Microbiol.95:38-43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    Martineau, F., F. J. Picard, N. Lansac, C. Ménard, P. H. Roy, M. Ouellette, and M. G. Bergeron. 2000. Correlation between the resistance genotype determined by multiplex PCR assays and the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.44:231-238.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    McDougal, L. K., C. D. Steward, G. E. Killgore, J. M. Chaitram, S. K. McAllister, and F. C. Tenover. 2003. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the United States: establishing a national database. J. Clin. Microbiol.41:5113-5120.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    Miklasevics, E., S. Haeggman, A. Balode, B. Sanchez, A. Martinsons, B. Olsson-Liljequist, and U. Dumpis. 2004. Report on the first PVL-positive community acquired MRSA strain in Latvia. Euro. Surveill.9:29-30.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    Mongodin, E., O. Bajolet, J. Cutrona, N. Bonnet, F. Dupuit, E. Puchelle, and S. de Bentzmann. 2002. Fibronectin-binding proteins of Staphylococcus aureus are involved in adherence to human airway epithelium. Infect. Immun.70:620-630.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    Naimi, T. S., K. H. LeDell, K. Como-Sabetti, S. M. Borchardt, D. J. Boxrud, J. Etienne, S. K. Johnson, F. Vandenesch, S. Fridkin, C. O'Boyle, R. N. Danila, and R. Lynfield. 2003. Comparison of community- and health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. JAMA290:2976-2984.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    Nakagawa, S., I. Taneike, D. Mimura, N. Iwakura, T. Nakayama, T. Emura, M. Kitatsuji, A. Fujimoto, and T. Yamamoto. 2005. Gene sequences and specific detection for Panton-Valentine leukocidin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.328:995-1002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2003. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 6th ed. Approved standard M7-A6. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  36. 36.↵
    Nei, M., and W. H. Li. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA76:5269-5273.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    O'Brien, F. G., T. T. Lim, F. N. Chong, G. W. Coombs, M. C. Enright, D. A. Robinson, A. Monk, B. Said-Salim, B. N. Kreiswirth, and W. B. Grubb. 2004. Diversity among community isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Australia. J. Clin. Microbiol.42:3185-3190.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    Oliveira, D. C., and H. de Lencastre. 2002. Multiplex PCR strategy for rapid identification of structural types and variants of the mec element in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.46:2155-2161.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    Orwin, P. M., D. Y. Leung, H. L. Donahue, R. P. Novick, and P. M. Schlievert. 2001. Biochemical and biological properties of staphylococcal enterotoxin K. Infect. Immun.69:360-366.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    Otsuka, T., K. Saito, S. Dohmae, T. Takano, W. Higuchi, Y. Takizawa, T. Okubo, N. Iwakura, and T. Yamamoto. 2006. Key adhesin gene in community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.346:1234-1244.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    Ribeiro, A., C. Dias, M. C. Silva-Carvalho, L. Berquó, F. A. Ferreira, R. N. S. Santos, B. T. Ferreira-Carvalho, and A. M. Figueiredo. 2005. First report of infection with community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in South America. J. Clin. Microbiol.43:1985-1988.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    Rydén, C., I. Maxe, A. Franzén, Å. Ljungh, D. Heinegård, and K. Rubin. 1987. Selective binding of bone matrix sialoprotein to Staphylococcus aureus in osteomyelitis. Lancetii:515.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    Rydén, C., H. S. Tung, V. Nikolaev, Å. Engström, and Å. Oldberg. 1997. Staphylococcus aureus causing osteomyelitis binds to a nonapeptide sequence in bone sialoprotein. Biochem. J.327:825-829.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    Saiman, L., M. O'Keefe, P. L. Graham III, F. Wu, B. Said-Salim, B. Kreiswirth, A. LaSala, P. M. Schlievert, and P. Della-Latta. 2003. Hospital transmission of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among postpartum women. Clin. Infect. Dis.37:1313-1319.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    Shimada, K. 1986. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Nippon Rinsho44:2112-2121. (In Japanese.)
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    Shopsin, B., M. Gomez, S. O. Montgomery, D. H. Smith, M. Waddington, D. E. Dodge, D. A. Bost, M. Riehman, S. Naidich, and B. N. Kreiswirth. 1999. Evaluation of protein A gene polymorphic region DNA sequencing for typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains. J. Clin. Microbiol.37:3556-3563.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    Strommenger, B., C. Cuny, G. Werner, and W. Witte. 2004. Obvious lack of association between dynamics of epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in central Europe and agr specificity groups. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.23:15-19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. 48.↵
    Takizawa, Y., I. Taneike, S. Nakagawa, T. Oishi, Y. Nitahara, N. Iwakura, K. Ozaki, M. Takano, T. Nakayama, and T. Yamamoto. 2005. A Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL)-positive community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain, another such strain carrying a multiple-drug resistance plasmid, and other more-typical PVL-negative MRSA strains found in Japan. J. Clin. Microbiol.43:3356-3363.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    Taneike, I., T. Otsuka, S. Dohmae, K. Saito, K. Ozaki, M. Takano, W. Higuchi, T. Takano, and T. Yamamoto. 2006. Molecular nature of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus derived from explosive nosocomial outbreaks of the 1980s in Japan. FEBS Lett.580:2323-2334.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. 50.↵
    Tristan, A., L. Ying, M. Bes, J. Etienne, F. Vandenesch, and G. Lina. 2003. Use of multiplex PCR to identify Staphylococcus aureus adhesins involved in human hematogenous infections. J. Clin. Microbiol.41:4465-4467.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    Vancraeynest, D., K. Hermans, and F. Haesebrouck. 2004. Genotypic and phenotypic screening of high and low virulence Staphylococcus aureus isolates from rabbits for biofilm formation and MSCRAMMs. Vet. Microbiol.103:241-247.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    Vandenesch, F., T. Naimi, M. C. Enright, G. Lina, G. R. Nimmo, H. Heffernan, N. Liassine, M. Bes, T. Greenland, M. E. Reverdy, and J. Etienne. 2003. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes: worldwide emergence. Emerg. Infect. Dis.9:978-984.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.↵
    Vasudevan, P., M. K. Nair, T. Annamalai, and K. S. Venkitanarayanan. 2003. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of bovine mastitis isolates of Staphylococcus aureus for biofilm formation. Vet. Microbiol.92:179-185.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    Williams, R. J., J. M. Ward, B. Henderson, S. Poole, B. P. O'Hara, M. Wilson, and S. P. Nair. 2000. Identification of a novel gene cluster encoding staphylococcal exotoxin-like proteins: characterization of the prototypic gene and its protein product, SET1. Infect. Immun.68:4407-4415.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    Yamaguchi, T., K. Nishifuji, M. Sasaki, Y. Fudaba, M. Aepfelbacher, T. Takata, M. Ohara, H. Komatsuzawa, M. Amagai, and M. Sugai. 2002. Identification of the Staphylococcus aureus etd pathogenicity island which encodes a novel exfoliative toxin, ETD, and EDIN-B. Infect. Immun.70:5835-5845.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. 56.↵
    Zetola, N., J. S. Francis, E. L. Nuermberger, and W. R. Bishai. 2005. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an emerging threat. Lancet Infect. Dis.5:275-286.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. 57.↵
    Zhang, S., J. J. Iandolo, and G. C. Stewart. 1998. The enterotoxin D plasmid of Staphylococcus aureus encodes a second enterotoxin determinant (sej). FEMS Microbiol. Lett.168:227-233.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Molecular Characteristics and In Vitro Susceptibility to Antimicrobial Agents, Including the Des-Fluoro(6) Quinolone DX-619, of Panton-Valentine Leucocidin-Positive Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from the Community and Hospitals
Tatsuo Yamamoto, Soshi Dohmae, Kohei Saito, Taketo Otsuka, Tomomi Takano, Megumi Chiba, Katsuko Fujikawa, Mayumi Tanaka
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Nov 2006, 50 (12) 4077-4086; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00847-06

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Molecular Characteristics and In Vitro Susceptibility to Antimicrobial Agents, Including the Des-Fluoro(6) Quinolone DX-619, of Panton-Valentine Leucocidin-Positive Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from the Community and Hospitals
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Molecular Characteristics and In Vitro Susceptibility to Antimicrobial Agents, Including the Des-Fluoro(6) Quinolone DX-619, of Panton-Valentine Leucocidin-Positive Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from the Community and Hospitals
Tatsuo Yamamoto, Soshi Dohmae, Kohei Saito, Taketo Otsuka, Tomomi Takano, Megumi Chiba, Katsuko Fujikawa, Mayumi Tanaka
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Nov 2006, 50 (12) 4077-4086; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00847-06
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Bacterial Toxins
community-acquired infections
Exotoxins
Hospitals
Leukocidins
methicillin resistance
Pyrrolidines
quinolones
Staphylococcus aureus

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596