Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Susceptibility

Antifungal Susceptibilities of the Species of the Pseudallescheria boydii Complex

Fèlix Gilgado, Carolina Serena, Josep Cano, Josepa Gené, Josep Guarro
Fèlix Gilgado
Unitat de Microbiologia, Facultat de Medicina i Ciencies de la Salut, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carolina Serena
Unitat de Microbiologia, Facultat de Medicina i Ciencies de la Salut, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Josep Cano
Unitat de Microbiologia, Facultat de Medicina i Ciencies de la Salut, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Josepa Gené
Unitat de Microbiologia, Facultat de Medicina i Ciencies de la Salut, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Josep Guarro
Unitat de Microbiologia, Facultat de Medicina i Ciencies de la Salut, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: josep.guarro@urv.cat
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00981-06
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Eighty-four isolates belonging to eight species that constitute the Pseudallescheria boydii complex were tested against 11 antifungal agents by using the microdilution method. There were significant differences among the species, with Scedosporium aurantiacum being the most resistant. In general, voriconazole was the most active drug, followed by posaconazole.

In the last few decades, Pseudallescheria boydii sensu lato has been emerging as an important human pathogen, particularly in immunocompromised hosts (8). The optimal treatment for these infections is unknown, and the mortality rate is very high despite aggressive antifungal treatment (8). It has been repeatedly demonstrated that P. boydii sensu lato has low in vitro (6) and in vivo (3, 4, 9) susceptibilities to traditional antifungal drugs. However, the new triazoles, such as voriconazole (VRC), ravuconazole (RVC), and posaconazole (PSC), have shown some in vitro activities against this fungus (5). VRC has also shown efficacy both in animal models (3, 4) and in the clinical setting (1, 13). However, not all the strains of P. boydii tested responded equally to VRC. For instance, Capilla and Guarro (3) demonstrated that one strain that showed a VRC MIC of 0.5 to 1 μg/ml was susceptible to this drug in a guinea pig model, while another strain with a VRC MIC of 8 μg/ml was resistant. Similarly, some human infections have responded to treatment with this drug (1) and others have not (15). This could be explained by the fact that P. boydii does not represent a single species but instead is a complex comprising at least six known species (P. boydii, Pseudallescheria angusta, Pseudallescheria ellipsoidea, Pseudallescheria fusoidea, Pseudallescheria minutispora, and Scedosporium aurantiacum) and two cryptic species represented by clades 3 and 4 as described by Gilgado et al. (7). Since the antifungal susceptibilities of these species are unknown, we have evaluated the in vitro activities of 11 drugs against strains representing all of them.

Eighty-four isolates were tested (Table 1). The isolates were stored in slant cultures of potato dextrose agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) covered with paraffin oil, subcultured on potato dextrose agar plates, and incubated at 30°C for 5 to 6 days. Candida krusei ATCC 6258 and Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 were included as quality controls. Antifungal agents were obtained as pure powders. Amphotericin B (AMB) (USP, Rockville, MD), itraconazole (ITC) and ketoconazole (KTC) (Janssen Pharmaceutica, Beerse, Belgium), albaconazole (J. Uriach & Cía, Barcelona, Spain), VRC (Pfizer Inc., Madrid, Spain), PSC (Schering-Plough Ltd., Hertfordshire, United Kingdom), RVC (Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, New Brunswick, NJ), and terbinafine (Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) were diluted in dimethyl sulfoxide (Panreac Química S.A., Barcelona, Spain), and micafungin (MFG) (Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan), flucytosine (5FC) (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO), and fluconazole (FLC) (Pfizer Inc., Madrid, Spain) were diluted in sterile distilled water. Microplates were prepared as described in the NCCLS M38-A document (11). Final drug concentrations ranged from 32 to 0.06 μg/ml for MFG, from 64 to 0.12 μg/ml for FLC and 5FC, and from 16 to 0.03 μg/ml for the other drugs. The microplates were incubated at 35°C and read at 48 h. The MIC endpoints for the triazoles and AMB were defined as the lowest concentrations that produced complete inhibition of growth, and those for FLC, KTC, 5FC, and MFG were defined as the lowest concentrations that produced 50% growth inhibition. Approximately 80% of the tests were repeated, and the results showed the same tendencies (data not shown). However, when the results did not coincide, the test was repeated and the mode of the three MIC values was considered.

Results are shown in Table 1. VRC was the most active drug, showing a total geometric mean (GM) MIC of 0.61 μg/ml. S. aurantiacum was the species that was most resistant to this drug (GM MIC of 1.48 μg/ml). PSC was the second most active drug, with a total GM MIC of 0.89 μg/ml, although this drug was not active against species such as S. aurantiacum (GM MIC of 3.62 μg/ml) and P. fusoidea (GM MIC of 2 μg/ml). The activity of PSC was more variable than that of VRC and depended on the species tested.

AMB was not active against any of the isolates tested, but important differences were noticed between the MICs for the two species more commonly involved in human infections (7; F. Gilgado, J. Cano, J. Gené, and J. Guarro, Abstr. 16th Congr. Int. Soc. Hum. Anim. Mycol., abstr. P-0750, 2006). Thus, against the isolates of clade 4, this drug had a GM MIC of 4.33, whereas against P. boydii, it was 14.92 μg/ml. 5FC MICs were always >64 μg/ml.

In some works (5, 17), drugs like ITC and RVC showed good in vitro activities, but in our study, they showed poor activities against most of the strains tested. This could be explained by the fact that we have tested a greater number of isolates than previous studies. The poor activity of ITC agrees with the failure of this drug to resolve some clinical cases (9, 13). The treatment of Pseudallescheria infections is often challenging and complex. This study confirms VRC as the recommended treatment for scedosporiosis (8, 12), since it is the drug that showed the lowest MIC against the eight species tested. PSC has also shown good activity, but there is little clinical experience with this drug. Therapy with this drug resolved completely a brain abscess in a leukemia patient (10). Since MFG showed poor activities against all the species tested in our study, candins, in general, would be expected to have low levels of activity against Pseudallescheria species. However, Yustes and Guarro (18) demonstrated that the combination of MFG with AMB has potential for the treatment of scedosporiosis.

The application of genealogical concordance phylogenetic species recognition, which is an operational method based on the analysis of multigene sequences, on numerous pathogenic fungi (16) revealed the existence of numerous cryptic species. As with the P. boydii complex, among other important pathogenic fungi, such as Candida albicans or Aspergillus fumigatus, several cryptic species with different antifungal susceptibilities have been detected (2, 14).

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the proper identification of the species of the P. boydii complex involved in a given infection could be important for appropriate treatment. For instance, if the species causing the infection is S. aurantiacum, it is likely that the response to the treatment with VRC would be poorer than if the species was P. boydii.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Activities of conventional and new antifungal drugs against 84 isolates belonging to species of the P. boydii complex

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 7 August 2006.
    • Returned for modification 5 September 2006.
    • Accepted 19 September 2006.
  • Copyright © 2006 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Apostolova, L. G., E. K. Johnson, and J. P. Adams. 2005. Disseminated Pseudallescheria boydii infection successfully treated with voriconazole. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry76:1741-1742.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Balajee, S. A., J. L. Gribskov, E. Hanley, D. Nickle, and K. A. Marr. 2005. Aspergillus lentulus sp. nov., a new sibling species of A. fumigatus. Eukaryot. Cell4:625-632.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Capilla, J., and J. Guarro. 2004. Correlation between in vitro susceptibility of Scedosporium apiospermum to voriconazole and in vivo outcome of scedosporiosis in guinea pigs. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.48:4009-4011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Capilla, J., C. Serena, F. J. Pastor, M. Ortoneda, and J. Guarro. 2003. Efficacy of voriconazole in the treatment of systemic scedosporiosis in neutropenic mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.47:3976-3978.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Carrillo, A. J., and J. Guarro. 2001. In vitro activities of four novel triazoles against Scedosporium spp. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.45:2151-2153.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Cuenca-Estrella, M., B. Ruiz-Diez, J. V. Martinez-Suarez, A. Monzon, and J. L. Rodriguez-Tudela. 1999. Comparative in-vitro activity of voriconazole (UK-109,496) and six other antifungal agents against clinical isolates of Scedosporium prolificans and Scedosporium apiospermum. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.43:149-151.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Gilgado, F., J. Cano, J. Gené, and J. Guarro. 2005. Molecular phylogeny of the Pseudallescheria boydii species complex: proposal of two new species. J. Clin. Microbiol.43:4930-4942.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Guarro, J., A. S. Kantarcioglu, R. Horre, J. L. Rodriguez-Tudela, M. Cuenca-Estrella, J. Berenguer, and S. de Hoog. 2006. Scedosporium apiospermum: changing clinical spectrum of a therapy-refractory opportunist. Med. Mycol.44:295-327.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Kowacs, P. A., C. E. Soares-Silvado, S. Monteiro, M. Ramos, K. Abrao, L. E. Madaloso, R. L. Pinheiro, and L. C. Werneck. 2006. Infection of the CNS by Scedosporium apiospermum after near drowning. Report of a fatal case and analysis of its confounding factors. J. Clin. Pathol.57:205-207.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    Mellinghoff, I. K., D. J. Winston, G. Mukwaya, and G. J. Schiller. 2002. Treatment of Scedosporium apiospermum brain abscesses with posaconazole. Clin. Infect. Dis.34:1648-1650.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2002. References method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi. Approved standard M38-A. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  12. 12.↵
    Pfaller, M. A., P. G. Pappas, and J. R. Wingard. 2006. Invasive fungal pathogens: current epidemiological trends. Clin. Infect. Dis.43:S3-S14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Porte, L., L. El Hajj, S. Cassaing, A. Berry, P. Massip, M. D. Linas, J. F. Magnaval, N. Sans, and B. Marchou. 2006. Scedosporium apiospermum mycetoma with bone involvement successfully treated with voriconazole. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg.100:891-894.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Pujol, C., M. A. Pfaller, and D. R. Soll. 2004. Flucytosine resistance is restricted to a single genetic clade of Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.48:262-266.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Symoens, F., C. Knoop, M. Schrooyen, O. Denis, M. Estenne, N. Nolard, and F. Jacobs. 2006. Disseminated Scedosporium apiospermum infection in a cystic fibrosis patient after double-lung transplantation. J. Heart Lung Transplant.25:603-607.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Taylor, J. W., D. J. Jacobson, S. Kroken, T. Kasuga, D. M. Geiser, D. S. Hibbett, and M. C. Fisher. 2000. Phylogenetic species recognition and species concepts in fungi. Fungal Genet. Biol.31:21-32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Walsh, T. J., J. Peter, D. A. McGough, A. W. Fothergill, M. G. Rinaldi, and P. A. Pizzo. 1995. Activities of amphotericin B and antifungal azoles alone and in combination against Pseudallescheria boydii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.39:1361-1364.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Yustes, C., and J. Guarro. 2005. In vitro synergistic interaction between amphotericin B and micafungin against Scedosporium spp. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.49:3498-3500.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Antifungal Susceptibilities of the Species of the Pseudallescheria boydii Complex
Fèlix Gilgado, Carolina Serena, Josep Cano, Josepa Gené, Josep Guarro
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Nov 2006, 50 (12) 4211-4213; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00981-06

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Antifungal Susceptibilities of the Species of the Pseudallescheria boydii Complex
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Antifungal Susceptibilities of the Species of the Pseudallescheria boydii Complex
Fèlix Gilgado, Carolina Serena, Josep Cano, Josepa Gené, Josep Guarro
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Nov 2006, 50 (12) 4211-4213; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00981-06
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

antifungal agents
Pseudallescheria
Scedosporium

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596