Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mechanisms of Resistance

CMY-16, a Novel Acquired AmpC-Type β-Lactamase of the CMY/LAT Lineage in Multifocal Monophyletic Isolates of Proteus mirabilis from Northern Italy

Marco M. D'Andrea, Elisabetta Nucleo, Francesco Luzzaro, Tommaso Giani, Roberta Migliavacca, Francesca Vailati, Vesselina Kroumova, Laura Pagani, Gian Maria Rossolini
Marco M. D'Andrea
Dipartimento di Biologia Molecolare, Laboratorio di Fisiologia e Biotecnologia dei Microrganismi, Università di Siena, I-53100 Siena
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elisabetta Nucleo
Dipartimento di Scienze Morfologiche Eidologiche e Cliniche, Sezione di Microbiologia, Università di Pavia, I-27100 Pavia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesco Luzzaro
Laboratorio di Microbiologia, Ospedale di Circolo, Università dell'Insubria, I-21100 Varese
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tommaso Giani
Dipartimento di Biologia Molecolare, Laboratorio di Fisiologia e Biotecnologia dei Microrganismi, Università di Siena, I-53100 Siena
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roberta Migliavacca
Dipartimento di Scienze Morfologiche Eidologiche e Cliniche, Sezione di Microbiologia, Università di Pavia, I-27100 Pavia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesca Vailati
Ospedali Riuniti, I-24128 Bergamo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vesselina Kroumova
Ospedale Maggiore, I-28100 Novara, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Pagani
Dipartimento di Scienze Morfologiche Eidologiche e Cliniche, Sezione di Microbiologia, Università di Pavia, I-27100 Pavia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gian Maria Rossolini
Dipartimento di Biologia Molecolare, Laboratorio di Fisiologia e Biotecnologia dei Microrganismi, Università di Siena, I-53100 Siena
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rossolini@unisi.it
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.50.2.618-624.2006
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

We report multifocal detection (four different cities in northern Italy) of Proteus mirabilis isolates resistant to both oxyimino- and 7-α-methoxy-cephalosporins and producing a novel acquired AmpC-like β-lactamase. The enzyme, named CMY-16, is a variant of the CMY/LAT lineage, which differs from the closest homologues, CMY-4 and CMY-12, by a single amino acid substitution (A171S or N363S, respectively) and from CMY-2 by two substitutions (A171S and W221R). Expression of the cloned blaCMY-16 gene in Escherichia coli decreased susceptibility to penicillins, cephalosporins, and aztreonam. Tazobactam was more effective than clavulanate at antagonizing the enzyme activity. Genotyping, by random amplification of polymorphic DNA and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of genomic DNA digested with SfiI, showed that isolates were clonally related to each other, although not identical. The blaCMY-16 gene was not transferable to E. coli by conjugation or transformation. In all isolates, it was chromosomally located and inserted in a conserved genetic environment. PCR mapping experiments revealed that the blaCMY-16 was flanked by ISEcp1 and the blc gene, similar to other genes of this lineage from plasmids of Salmonella enterica, Klebsiella spp., and E. coli. Overall, these results revealed multifocal spreading of a CMY-16-producing P. mirabilis clone in northern Italy. This finding represents the first report of an acquired AmpC-like β-lactamase in Proteus mirabilis from Italy and underscores the emergence of similar resistance determinants in the European setting.

AmpC-type β-lactamases (CBLs), belonging to Ambler's molecular class C and group 1 of the Bush-Jacoby-Medeiros functional classification (6), are a large group of enzymes of broad substrate specificity. They can degrade penicillins and most cephalosporins (including 7-α-methoxy derivatives), usually being poorly inhibited by serine β-lactamase inactivators. CBLs are usually not active or very poorly active on aztreonam, the zwitterionic oxyimino-cephalosporins (such as cefepime and cefpirome), and imipenem but can contribute to decreased susceptibility or even resistance to these compounds, especially when enzyme overproduction is associated with permeability defects or drug efflux (13, 15).

A number of CBLs are encoded by chromosomal genes resident in some gram-negative pathogens (e.g., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp., and several members of the family Enterobacteriaceae), while others are encoded by genes associated with mobile DNA elements that can be acquired by horizontal gene transfer (15, 23). These acquired CBLs, which are usually plasmid mediated and belong to at least five different lineages, are emerging worldwide in various species of Enterobacteriaceae, such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., and Proteus mirabilis (2, 14, 16-19, 23, 34). Although the prevalence of the acquired CBLs is not really known, they have become an important cause of resistance to expanded-spectrum β-lactams in some settings (2, 14, 17).

P. mirabilis, which lacks resident chromosomal β-lactamase genes, is entirely dependent upon acquisition of heterologous β-lactamase genes to express a β-lactamase-mediated resistance phenotype (15). A broad repertoire of acquired β-lactamases have been reported in this species, including broad- and extended-spectrum enzymes of molecular class A/functional group 2 (4, 15, 20, 22, 25, 26) and CBLs (8, 14, 23).

Acquired CBLs have been reported in P. mirabilis isolates from several geographic areas (France, Tunisia, Poland, and Korea) and include enzymes of the ACC, CMY/LAT, and DHA/MOR lineages, although members of the CMY/LAT lineage (derived from the chromosomal AmpC enzyme of Citrobacter freundii) are most frequently reported (3, 8, 12, 14, 23, 24, 34). Production of such enzymes is usually responsible for a broad-spectrum β-lactam resistance phenotype, including penicillins, narrow-spectrum cephalosporins, and expanded-spectrum cephalosporins (except the zwitterionic oxyimino-cephalosporins) (23).

In this report, we describe the identification and characterization of a new acquired AmpC-type β-lactamase of the CMY/LAT lineage, CMY-16, in clinical isolates of P. mirabilis from different cities of northern Italy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical isolates.The P. mirabilis isolates investigated in this work were isolated at the clinical microbiology laboratories of four hospitals located in different cities of northern Italy (Bergamo, Milan, Novara, and Varese) during the period August 2003 to June 2004. Identification of isolates was carried out by the systems routinely used in each laboratory and confirmed using the Phoenix automated system (BD Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, Md.).

In vitro susceptibility testing.MICs for clinical isolates of P. mirabilis and for E. coli DH5α(pBC-CMY16) were determined using the E test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). Results were interpreted according to the criteria of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (7). E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as a reference strain for quality control of in vitro susceptibility testing.

β-Lactamase assays.The double-disk diffusion test for extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) detection was carried out as described previously (21) by placing clavulanate- or tazobactam-containing disks at a distance of 25 mm (center to center) from disks containing the expanded-spectrum β-lactams. Analytical isoelectric focusing (IEF) of crude cell extracts, detection of β-lactamase bands by nitrocefin, and detection of the activities of the β-lactamase bands separated by IEF against β-lactams by a substrate-overlaying procedure were carried out as described previously (21). Reference strains producing TEM-1, TEM-2, TEM-12, SHV-1, SHV-5, and MIR-1 were used as controls, as described previously (21).

DNA analysis and manipulation methodology.PCR was always carried out in a 50-μl volume, with 30 pmol of each primer, 200 μM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 1.5 mM MgCl2, and 0.5 U of the Expand High-Fidelity PCR system (Roche Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) in the reaction buffer provided by the enzyme manufacturer. The PCR primers used in this study for amplification of plasmid-mediated CBL genes and mapping of flanking regions, and the cycling conditions, are reported in Table 1. PCR for amplification of blaTEM alleles was carried out as described previously (21). Nucleotide sequences were determined on both strands directly on PCR amplification products at an external sequencing facility (Macrogen Inc., Seoul, South Korea). Plasmid pBC-CMY16 was constructed by amplification of the blaCMY-16 coding sequence with primers CMY-Exp_Fw and CMY-Exp_Rev (Table 1) and by cloning the amplification product, digested with XbaI and BamHI, into the E. coli plasmid vector pBC-SK(+) (Stratagene, Inc., La Jolla, Calif.) digested with the same enzymes. The authenticity of the cloned fragment was confirmed by sequencing. The E. coli DH5α strain (27) was used as the host for this plasmid. Total DNA from P. mirabilis was extracted as described previously (27). Southern blot hybridizations were carried out on dried gels as described previously (30), using as a probe an amplification product containing the blaCMY-2 gene generated with primers CMY/F and CMY/R (Table 1) or a 16S rRNA probe obtained by PCR using primers EubA and EubB as described previously (11). The probes were labeled with 32P by the random-priming technique (Rediprime II DNA Labeling system; Amersham Biosciences).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Oligonucleotide primers used in this work

Genotyping methodology.Random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) fingerprinting was carried out using primer 1254 (5′-CCGCAGCCAA) (1) or AP12h (5′-CGGCCCCTGT) (32). Reactions were carried out in a 25-μl volume with 40 pmol of primer 1254 or AP12h, 240 μM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 1.5 mM MgCl2, and 0.5 U of the Expand High-Fidelity PCR system in the reaction buffer provided by the enzyme manufacturer. Cycling parameters were as follows: 5 min at 94°C; 35 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 37°C, and 1 min at 72°C; and a final extension step of 10 min at 72°C. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profiles of genomic DNA were analyzed by means of the Gene Path procedure (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, Calif.) using the no. 5 pathogen group reagent kit and the restriction enzyme SfiI (Bio-Rad) or I-CeuI (New England Biolabs, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom). DNA fragments were electrophoresed in 1% agarose gels in 0.5× Tris-borate-EDTA buffer at 14°C and 6 V/cm for 20 h, with pulse times ranging from 5 to 50 s (following SfiI digestion), or in 1% agarose gels in 1× Tris-borate-EDTA buffer at 14°C and 4 V/cm for 48 h, with pulse times ranging from 90 to 325 s (following I-CeuI digestion), using the Gene Path system (Bio-Rad). Bacteriophage λ concatemers (Bio-Rad) or Yeast Chromosome PFG (New England Biolabs) were used as DNA size markers. Clonal relationships based on PFGE patterns were interpreted according to the criteria proposed by Tenover et al. (29).

Gene transfer experiments.Conjugation experiments were performed on a solid medium (Mueller-Hinton agar; Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) using E. coli J53 (F− met pro Rifr) as the recipient strain. The initial donor/recipient ratio was 0.1. Mating plates were incubated at 37°C for 12 h. Transconjugants were selected on Mueller-Hinton agar containing ampicillin (50 μg/ml) plus rifampin (300 μg/ml). The detection sensitivity of the assay was ≤1 × 10−10 transconjugants/recipient. Electroporation of total-DNA preparations of P. mirabilis in E. coli DH5α was carried out using a Gene Pulser apparatus (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Transformants were selected on LB agar containing ampicillin (100 mg/liter).

Nucleotide sequence accession number.The GenBank accession number for blaCMY-16 is AJ781421.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Multifocal detection of P. mirabilis isolates resistant to oxyimino- and 7-α-methoxy-cephalosporins.During the period August 2003 to June 2004, eight nonreplicate clinical isolates of P. mirabilis resistant to oxyimino-cephalosporins (including ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, and ceftazidime) and cefoxitin were detected at the clinical microbiology laboratories of four hospitals located in four different cities of northern Italy. Most isolates were from inpatients in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) or in geriatric or rehabilitation wards, but one isolate (BG-073/03) was from an outpatient (Table 2). Most isolates were from urinary tract infections (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Antimicrobial susceptibility to β-lactams and epidemiological features of the eight P. mirabilis isolates

The resistance profiles of the eight isolates, including ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cephalothin, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefoxitin, and fluoroquinolones, were overall similar. All isolates were intermediate to piperacillin and susceptible to piperacillin-tazobactam, aztreonam, cefepime, carbapenems, and aminoglycosides (except one that was resistant to gentamicin) (Table 2). A double-disk synergy test did not reveal any detectable synergy between clavulanate and cefotaxime, ceftazidime, or aztreonam. However, a synergy pattern was detectable between tazobactam or clavulanate and cefepime (data not shown).

Analysis of the β-lactam resistance determinants.Analytical IEF revealed, in all isolates, the presence of two β-lactamase bands, of pI 5.4 and >8.4, respectively (data not shown). In a substrate overlay assay, the pI 5.4 band was unable to hydrolyze cefoxitin, cefotaxime, and ceftazidime, suggesting the presence of a non-ESBL TEM-like enzyme. On the other hand, the alkaline pI band was able to hydrolyze cefoxitin, cefotaxime, and ceftazidime, suggesting the presence of an acquired CBL.

Molecular analysis confirmed the presence of a blaTEM-1b allele in all isolates. Multiplex PCR for detection of plasmid-mediated CBL genes using the AmpC/I-IV set of primers (Table 1) yielded, from all isolates, an amplicon whose size (760 bp) was consistent with the presence of a gene of the blaCMY/LAT lineage. Sequencing the entire gene, amplified with the CMY/F and CMY/R primers (Table 1), revealed the presence in all isolates of identical alleles, which encoded a new CMY variant named CMY-16. Compared with either CMY-4 (31) or CMY-12 (8), which are the closest homologues, CMY-16 has a single amino acid substitution: A171S or N363S, respectively, according to the numbering scheme used by Decre et al. (8). Compared with CMY-2 (CAA62957.1), CMY-16 has two amino acid substitutions: A171S and W221R. At the nucleotide sequence level, blaCMY-16 exhibits two point mutations compared with blaCMY-4 (T511G and G1140A), blaCMY-12 (G1088A and G1140A), or blaCMY-2 (T511G and C661T). In the first two cases, the G1140A transition is silent.

PCR mapping using primers ISEcp1_Fw and blc-Rev (Table 1), designed based on the flanking regions of other blaCMY-2-like genes, yielded amplification products of about 1.7 kb from all isolates, suggesting that in all of them the blaCMY-16 gene was located between ISEcp1 and the blc gene, i.e., in the same genetic context reported for other genes of this lineage from plasmids of Salmonella enterica (10), Klebsiella spp. (33), and E. coli (9).

Functional characterization of CMY-16.The functional properties of CMY-16 were investigated by expression of the enzyme in E. coli DH5α and by testing susceptibility to several β-lactams. Analytical IEF of DH5α(pBC-CMY16) revealed the presence of a β-lactamase band with a pI of >8.4 (data not shown), confirming the expression of the CMY-16 enzyme in this strain. Compared to DH5α, DH5α(pBC-CMY16) exhibited decreased susceptibility to a broad array of β-lactams (Table 3). The impact was higher for penicillins, narrow-spectrum cephalosporins, cephamycins, oxyimino-cephalosporins (except cefepime), and aztreonam. However, some reduction of susceptibility was also observed for cefepime. Serine β-lactamase inhibitors showed a variable effect, with tazobactam being significantly more active than clavulanate at antagonizing the enzyme activity.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

β-Lactam susceptibilities of E. coli DH5α(pBC-CMY16) producing the CMY-16 enzyme and DH5α(pBC-SK)

Clonal relatedness of the P. mirabilis isolates.Genotyping by RAPD fingerprinting yielded identical or almost identical profiles with all isolates (Fig. 1). PFGE profiles of genomic DNAs digested with SfiI were identical or clearly related (Fig. 2). Overall, these results indicated that the eight isolates were clonally related to each other.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

RAPD fingerprinting of isolates investigated in this work, carried out with primer 1254 (A) or AP12h (B). Lanes 1, BG-073/03; lanes 2, NO-080/03; lanes 3, VA-1017/03; lanes 4, NO-051/03; lanes 5, PM207RED; lanes 6, PM208RED; lanes 7, PM209RED; lanes 8, PM210RED. DNA size standards are indicated in bp on the left.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

PFGE profiles of genomic DNAs of the eight P. mirabilis isolates producing CMY-16 after digestion with SfiI. Lane 1, PM207RED; lane 2, PM208RED; lane 3, PM209RED; lane 4, PM210RED; lane 5, NO-051/03; lane 6, VA-1017/03; lane 7, NO-080/03; lane 8, BG-073/03. DNA size standards, expressed in kbp, are indicated on the left.

Clonal relatedness was not unexpected for isolates from the same ward of the same hospital (e.g., NO-051/03 and NO-080/03 or the four isolates from the LTCF), while it could be more surprising for isolates from different settings. However, the four cities are located at relatively small distances (65 to 90 km) from each other, and subsequent admissions of the same patient in different hospitals, which are not uncommon (especially for elderly patients attending LTCFs), might facilitate interhospital dissemination of resistant clones.

Transferability and genetic support of the blaCMY-16 gene.Transfer of β-lactam resistance to E. coli was not detected with any of the P. mirabilis isolates, either in conjugation assays with E. coli J53 as a recipient or following electroporation of total-DNA preparations into E. coli DH5α. Since ampicillin was used for the selection of transconjugants and transformants, neither the blaTEM-1b nor the blaCMY-16 determinant carried by the P. mirabilis isolates was apparently transferable to E. coli.

Agarose gel electrophoresis of total-DNA preparations of the eight P. mirabilis isolates revealed the presence of plasmid DNA bands in one isolate (BG-073/03) (data not shown), but a Southern blot analysis using a blaCMY-2 probe revealed a single hybridization signal corresponding to the band of chromosomal DNA with all isolates (Fig. 3 and data not shown). An identical hybridization pattern, resulting in a single band of approximately 15 kb with all isolates, was observed in a Southern blot analysis of total DNAs of the P. mirabilis isolates digested with XbaI, using the blaCMY-2 probe (Fig. 3).

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Lanes 1 to 9, results of Southern blot hybridization of genomic DNAs of the eight P. mirabilis isolates producing CMY-16 digested with XbaI and hybridized to the blaCMY-2 probe. Lane 1, PM207RED; lane 2, PM208RED; lane 3, PM209RED; lane 4, PM210RED; lane 5, BG-073/03; lane 6, NO-080/03; lane 7, NO-051/03; lane 8, VA-1017/03. DNA size standards, expressed in kbp, are indicated on the left. The hybridization signal obtained with undigested genomic DNA of one isolate (VA-1017/03) and the corresponding agarose gel electrophoresis images are shown in lanes 9 and 10.

Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA restricted with I-CeuI and separated by PFGE, using either a 16S rRNA probe or a blaCMY-16 probe, showed a hybridization signal on the same band (of approximately 280 kb) in all isolates (Fig. 4).

FIG. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 4.

PFGE profiles of genomic DNAs of the eight P. mirabilis isolates after digestion with I-CeuI (left) and Southern blot analysis of the same gel following hybridization with the blaCMY-16 probe (right). All bands visible in the gel and an additional band of smaller size (indicated by the asterisk) were recognized by the 16S rRNA gene probe. Lanes 1, PM207RED; lanes 2, PM208RED; lanes 3, PM209RED; lanes 4, PM210RED; lanes 5, NO-051/03; lanes 6, NO-080/03; lanes 7, BG-073/03; lanes 8, VA-1017/03. DNA size standards, expressed in kbp, are indicated on the left.

Altogether, these findings showed that the blaCMY-16 gene was inserted in the chromosome and that its genetic environment was conserved in all isolates, supporting the view that all the CMY-16-producing P. mirabilis isolates were derived from an original ancestor that had acquired blaCMY-16.

A chromosomal location was also previously reported for P. mirabilis isolates carrying blaCMY-3, blaCMY-4, blaCMY-12, blaCMY-14, and blaCMY-15 (5, 8, 14). A similar arrangement could be due to the fact that plasmids carrying these CBL genes and circulating among other Enterobacteriaceae are unable to replicate in P. mirabilis, and upon transfer to the species, this could result in recombination of β-lactamase genes in the chromosome of the new host.

Concluding remarks.Resistance of P. mirabilis to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins is an increasing problem in several epidemiological settings (8, 14, 21, 28). A similar resistance phenotype is usually mediated by the production of class A/group 2be ESBLs. In that case, resistance is usually reversible by clavulanate and other β-lactamase inhibitors, while susceptibility to cephamycins is not affected. The CBLs are overall less common than class A ESBLs as acquired resistance determinants, but emergence of these enzymes in P. mirabilis has been reported in several areas (3, 8, 12, 14, 23, 24, 34). To our knowledge, this is the first report of an acquired CBL in P. mirabilis from Italy.

As previously observed elsewhere (14), even in this case, the population of CBL-producing P. mirabilis isolates appeared to be monophyletic, likely reflecting the spread of a single clone after the event of acquisition of the β-lactamase determinant. It will be interesting to compare the Italian isolates with those from other countries to ascertain their potential clonal relationships.

CMY-16 is a new variant of the CMY/LAT lineage that might have evolved from either CMY-4 or CMY-12. Based on expression studies, its substrate profile and susceptibility to inhibitors seem to be overall similar to those of other members of the lineage, including CMY-2, CMY-4, CMY-12, CMY-14, and CMY-15 (14, 23). Comparative kinetic analyses of purified enzymes of this group to ascertain potential functional roles of the variable amino acid residues that characterize the different variants will be interesting.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by grants from the European Commission (LSHM-CT-2003-503335, COBRA Specific Targeted Research Project).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 21 July 2005.
    • Returned for modification 7 September 2005.
    • Accepted 17 November 2005.
  • American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Akopyanz, N., N. O. Bukanov, T. U. Westblom, S. Kresovich, and D. E. Berg. 1992. DNA diversity among clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori detected by PCR-based RAPD fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 20:5137-5142.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    Alvarez, M., J. H. Tran, N. Chow, and G. A. Jacoby. 2004. Epidemiology of conjugative plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:533-537.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Bidet, P., C. Verdet, V. Gautier, E. Bingen, and G. Arlet. 2005. First description of DHA-1 ampC β-lactamase in Proteus mirabilis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 11:591-592.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Bradford, P. A. 2001. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases in the 21st century: characterization, epidemiology, and detection of this important resistance threat. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 14:933-951.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Bret, L., C. Chanal-Claris, D. Sirot, E. B. Chaibi, R. Labia, and J. Sirot. 1998. Chromosomally encoded AmpC-type β-lactamase in a clinical isolate of Proteus mirabilis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:1110-1114.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Bush, K., G. A. Jacoby, and A. A. Medeiros. 1995. A functional classification scheme for β-lactamases and its correlation with molecular structure. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:1211-1233.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2005. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 15th informational supplement. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, Pa.
  8. ↵
    Decre, D., C. Verdet, L. Raskine, H. Blanchard, B. Burghoffer, A. Philippon, M. J. Sanson-Le-Pors, J. C. Petit, and G. Arlet. 2002. Characterization of CMY-type β-lactamases in clinical strains of Proteus mirabilis and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated in four hospitals in the Paris area. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 50:681-688.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Fosberry, A. P., D. J. Payne, E. J. Lawlor, and J. E. Hodgson. 1994. Cloning and sequence analysis of blaBIL-1, a plasmid-mediated class C β-lactamase gene in Escherichia coli BS. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:1182-1185.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Giles, W. P., A. K. Benson, M. E. Olson, R. W. Hutkins, J. M. Whichard, P. L. Winokur, and P. D. Fey. 2004. DNA sequence analysis of regions surrounding blaCMY-2 from multiple Salmonella plasmid backbones. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:2845-2852.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Giovannoni, S. 1991. Polymerase chain reaction, p. 177-204. In E. Stackebrandt and M. Goodfellow (ed.), Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. Wiley, New York, N.Y.
  12. ↵
    Girlich, D., A. Karim, C. Spicq, and P. Nordmann. 2000. Plasmid-mediated cephalosporinase ACC-1 in clinical isolates of Proteus mirabilis and Escherichia coli. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 19:893-895.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    Hanson, N. D. 2003. AmpC β-lactamases: what do we need to know for the future? J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 52:2-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Literacka, E., J. Empel, A. Baraniak, E. Sadowy, W. Hryniewicz, and M. Gniadkowski. 2004. Four variants of the Citrobacter freundii AmpC-type cephalosporinases, including novel enzymes CMY-14 and CMY-15, in a Proteus mirabilis clone widespread in Poland. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:4136-4143.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Livermore, D. M. 1995. β-Lactamases in laboratory and clinical resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 8:557-584.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Miriagou, V., L. S. Tzouvelekis, L. Villa, E. Lebessi, A. C. Vatopoulos, A. Carattoli, and E. Tzelepi. 2004. CMY-13, a novel inducible cephalosporinase encoded by an Escherichia coli plasmid. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:3172-3174.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Mulvey, M. R., E. Bryce, D. A. Boyd, M. Ofner-Agostini, A. M. Land, A. E. Simor, and S. Paton. 2005. Molecular characterization of cefoxitin-resistant Escherichia coli from Canadian hospitals. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:358-365.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. Nakano, R., R. Okamoto, Y. Nakano, K. Kaneko, N. Okitsu, Y. Hosaka, and M. Inoue. 2004. CFE-1, a novel plasmid-encoded AmpC β-lactamase with an ampR gene originating from Citrobacter freundii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:1151-1158.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Navarro, F., E. Perez-Trallero, J. M. Marimon, R. Aliaga, M. Gomariz, and B. Mirelis. 2001. CMY-2-producing Salmonella enterica, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Proteus mirabilis and Escherichia coli strains isolated in Spain (October 1999-December 2000). J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 48:383-389.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    Pagani, L., E. Dell'Amico, R. Migliavacca, M. M. D'Andrea, E. Giacobone, G. Amicosante, E. Romero, and G. M. Rossolini. 2003. Multiple CTX-M-type extended-spectrum β-lactamases in nosocomial isolates of Enterobacteriaceae from a hospital in northern Italy. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:4264-4269.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Pagani, L., R. Migliavacca, L. Pallecchi, C. Matti, E. Giacobone, G. Amicosante, E. Romero, and G. M. Rossolini. 2002. Emerging extended-spectrum β-lactamases in Proteus mirabilis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1549-1552.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Perilli, M., E. Dell'Amico, B. Segatore, M. R. de Massis, C. Bianchi, F. Luzzaro, G. M. Rossolini, A. Toniolo, G. Nicoletti, and G. Amicosante. 2002. Molecular characterization of extended-spectrum β-lactamases produced by nosocomial isolates of Enterobacteriaceae from an Italian nationwide survey. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:611-614.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Philippon, A., G. Arlet, and G. A. Jacoby. 2002. Plasmid-determined AmpC-type β-lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:1-11.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Rhimi-Mahjoubi, F., M. Bernier, G. Arlet, Z. B. Jemaa, P. Jouve, A. Hammami, and A. Philippon. 2002. Identification of plasmid-encoded cephalosporinase ACC-1 among various enterobacteria (Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Salmonella) isolated from a Tunisian hospital (Sfax 997-2000). Pathol. Biol. 50:7-11.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    Rodriguez, C., M. Radice, B. Perazzi, S. Castro, J. Juarez, P. Santini, C. Vay, A. Famiglietti, and G. Gutkind. 2005. Enzymatic resistance to β lactam antibiotics within the genus Proteus and evaluation of Proteus mirabilis phenotypes and genotypes for resistance to third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 23:122-126.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Saladin, M., V. T. Cao, T. Lambert, J. L. Donay, J. L. Herrmann, Z. Ould-Hocine, C. Verdet, F. Delisle, A. Philippon, and G. Arlet. 2002. Diversity of CTX-M β-lactamases and their promoter regions from Enterobacteriaceae isolated in three Parisian hospitals. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 209:161-168.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    Sambrook, J., and D. W. Russell. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
  28. ↵
    Spanu, T., F. Luzzaro, M. Perilli, G. Amicosante, A. Toniolo, and G. Fadda. 2002. Occurrence of extended-spectrum β-lactamases in members of the family Enterobacteriaceae in Italy: implications for resistance to β-lactams and other antimicrobial drugs. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:196-202.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Tenover, F. C., R. D. Arbeit, R. V. Goering, P. A. Mickelsen, B. E. Murray, D. H. Persing, and B. Swaminathan. 1995. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2233-2239.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Tsao, S. G., C. F. Brunk, and R. E. Pearlman. 1983. Hybridization of nucleic acids directly in agarose gels. Anal. Biochem. 131:365-372.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    Verdet, C., G. Arlet, R. S. Ben, H. A. Ben, P. H. Lagrange, and A. Philippon. 1998. Characterisation of CMY-4, an AmpC-type plasmid-mediated β-lactamase in a Tunisian clinical isolate of Proteus mirabilis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 169:235-240.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    Williams, J. G., A. R. Kubelik, K. J. Livak, J. A. Rafalski, and S. V. Tingey. 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:6531-6535.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    Wu, S. W., K. Dornbusch, G. Kronvall, and M. Norgren. 1999. Characterization and nucleotide sequence of a Klebsiella oxytoca cryptic plasmid encoding a CMY-type β-lactamase: confirmation that the plasmid-mediated cephamycinase originated from the Citrobacter freundii AmpC β-lactamase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1350-1357.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Yong, D., Y. Lim, W. Song, Y. S. Choi, D. Y. Park, H. Lee, J. H. Yum, K. Lee, J. M. Kim, and Y. Chong. 2005. Plasmid-mediated, inducible AmpC β-lactamase (DHA-1)-producing Enterobacteriaceae at a Korean hospital: wide dissemination in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella oxytoca and emergence in Proteus mirabilis. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 53:65-70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
CMY-16, a Novel Acquired AmpC-Type β-Lactamase of the CMY/LAT Lineage in Multifocal Monophyletic Isolates of Proteus mirabilis from Northern Italy
Marco M. D'Andrea, Elisabetta Nucleo, Francesco Luzzaro, Tommaso Giani, Roberta Migliavacca, Francesca Vailati, Vesselina Kroumova, Laura Pagani, Gian Maria Rossolini
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jan 2006, 50 (2) 618-624; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.50.2.618-624.2006

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CMY-16, a Novel Acquired AmpC-Type β-Lactamase of the CMY/LAT Lineage in Multifocal Monophyletic Isolates of Proteus mirabilis from Northern Italy
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
Share
CMY-16, a Novel Acquired AmpC-Type β-Lactamase of the CMY/LAT Lineage in Multifocal Monophyletic Isolates of Proteus mirabilis from Northern Italy
Marco M. D'Andrea, Elisabetta Nucleo, Francesco Luzzaro, Tommaso Giani, Roberta Migliavacca, Francesca Vailati, Vesselina Kroumova, Laura Pagani, Gian Maria Rossolini
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jan 2006, 50 (2) 618-624; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.50.2.618-624.2006
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596