Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mechanisms of Resistance

High Prevalence of Metallo-β-Lactamase and 16S rRNA Methylase Coproduction among Imipenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates in Brazil

Yohei Doi, Angela C. R. Ghilardi, Jennifer Adams, Doroti de Oliveira Garcia, David L. Paterson
Yohei Doi
1Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: doiy@dom.pitt.edu
Angela C. R. Ghilardi
2Instituto Adolfo Lutz, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Adams
1Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Doroti de Oliveira Garcia
2Instituto Adolfo Lutz, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David L. Paterson
1Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00443-07
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Rates of metallo-β-lactamase and 16S rRNA methylase production were investigated in 51 imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates collected from hospitals in São Paulo, Brazil. Of them, 57% and 75% produced SPM-1 and RmtD, respectively. Of note, 51% produced both enzymes, suggesting that their coproduction is already common in this geographic area.

Treatment of infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa is becoming increasingly complicated by its tendency to acquire resistance to multiple classes of antimicrobials (12). The agents typically used to treat these infections include antipseudomonal penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides. The production of metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) contributes substantially to panresistant phenotypes in P. aeruginosa because they confer resistance to all classes of β-lactam antimicrobials except aztreonam (10). Various MBLs including IMP, VIM, SPM, and GIM types have been reported for P. aeruginosa (12). Of note, SPM-type MBLs have been found only in Brazil thus far (13).

Methylation of 16S rRNA has emerged as a mechanism of high-level aminoglycoside resistance among gram-negative pathogens in recent years (3). Five such methylases, ArmA and RmtA through RmtD, have been reported to date. The most recently identified methylase is RmtD, which we reported previously for a panresistant P. aeruginosa strain isolated near São Paulo, Brazil (4). This enzyme confers high-level resistance to most aminoglycosides in clinical use. In this particular strain, the coproduction of RmtD and SPM-1 played a substantial role in the panresistant phenotype. The present study was conducted to determine the prevalence of coproduction of these enzymes among P. aeruginosa clinical isolates in Brazil.

Nonrepetitive imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates from a total of 49 patients hospitalized at seven hospitals in the São Paulo area in 2005 and 2006 were collected. One patient had two isolates with different pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns, and another patient had two isolates with identical PFGE patterns but markedly different susceptibility patterns. Thus, 51 imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates were included in the study. Sites of the specimens were as follows: 28 from urine, 8 from blood, 7 secretions from various sites, 3 from cerebrospinal fluid, 2 from catheter tip, 1 from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, 1 from ascitic fluid, and 1 from nasal swab.

The MICs of imipenem, meropenem, aztreonam, amikacin, gentamicin, arbekacin, ciprofloxacin, and colistin were obtained using either the standard agar dilution method or Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) (2). The MICs of imipenem were 32 μg/ml or higher for all the isolates, verifying the high degree of resistance to this agent in this collection. For meropenem, MICs were 8 μg/ml or higher. When the phenotypic test using sodium mercaptoacetic acid was performed to detect MBL production (1), 29 of 51 isolates (57%) yielded a positive result.

PFGE was performed with SpeI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) as the restriction enzyme for the genomic DNA. Electrophoresis was performed with the CHEF III DR system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The pulses were increased linearly from 5.3 to 34.9 s for 24 h at 14°C. Seventeen pulsotypes were observed among the 51 isolates by PFGE. Eight of the pulsotypes comprising 32 isolates from six hospitals were possibly related to each other (“pulsotype A,” consisting of subtypes A1 through A8), whereas the other nine pulsotypes were unrelated (pulsotypes B through J) according to criteria described previously by Tenover et al. (Table 1 and Fig. 1) (14). Pulsotype A was thus the most prevalent genotype in hospitals in this area.

PCR was conducted to detect the MBL gene blaSPM (6) and the 16S rRNA methylase gene rmtD. PCR for blaIMP-1, blaIMP-2, and blaVIM-2 was performed for all the blaSPM-negative isolates (11). For rmtD, the following primers were used to produce a 401-bp amplicon: rmtD-F (5′-CGGCACGCGATTGGGAAGC-3′) and rmtD-R (5′-CGGAAACGATGCGACGAT-3′). The thermal cycle conditions included an initial denaturation step at 96°C for 5 min followed by 30 cycles at 96°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min, with a final extension step at 72°C for 5 min. All the 29 isolates that produced a positive phenotypic test for MBL production yielded an amplicon consistent with blaSPM. When representative amplicons from different PFGE pulsotypes were sequenced, their deduced amino acid sequences matched that of SPM-1 within the amplicons (15). PCR results for blaIMP-1, blaIMP-2, and blaVIM-2 were all negative. These results suggested that SPM-1 is indeed the most predominant MBL among P. aeruginosa isolates in this geographic area. The median MIC of imipenem was greater than 256 μg/ml for blaSPM-positive isolates and 64 mg/ml for blaSPM-negative isolates (Table 2). For rmtD, 38 isolates (75%) yielded an amplicon. Deduced amino acid sequences of representative amplicons from different PFGE profiles were identical to that of RmtD within the amplicons. The MICs of arbekacin, amikacin, and gentamicin for the rmtD-positive isolates were always greater than 256 μg/ml. Of the 29 blaSPM-positive isolates, 26 were positive for rmtD as well. Thus, the prevalence of coproduction of SPM-1 and RmtD in this collection of imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates was 51% (26/51), and that among the SPM-1-producing isolates reached 90% (26/29). All of the blaSPM-positive isolates belonged to pulsotype A. Most of the rmtD-positive strains were also observed within pulsotype A, whereas some belonged to pulsotypes E, H, and J. These results suggest that the rmtD and blaSPM genes are spreading in São Paulo hospitals mostly by means of interhospital transmission of strains belonging to pulsotype A.

When the MICs of aminoglycosides were stratified according to the PCR results for rmtD, the sensitivities of arbekacin, amikacin, and gentamicin MICs greater than 256 μg/ml in predicting the presence of rmtD were all 100% (Table 3). On the other hand, the specificities of their MICs equal to or less than 256 μg/ml were 77%, 100%, and 54%, respectively. Therefore, amikacin was the best single agent to predict aminoglycoside resistance mediated by the production of RmtD. This result is in contrast with a previous finding with a collection of Acinetobacter sp. strains, where arbekacin displayed better specificity than amikacin (8). Although arbekacin generally retains better activity than amikacin in the presence of an aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme among gram-negative bacteria, this advantage may be lost when multiple modifying enzymes with different substrate specificities are produced simultaneously in a bacterium (5). Both agents are also known to be substrates of efflux pumps in P. aeruginosa (9). A combination of these resistance mechanisms may thus lead to high aminoglycoside MICs even in the absence of 16S rRNA methylase. The MICs of imipenem, meropenem, aztreonam, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, and colistin were then stratified depending on the PCR results for blaSPM (Table 2). Higher MICs of the carbapenems and lower MICs of aztreonam were observed in blaSPM-positive isolates, as expected, reflecting the substrate specificities of the MBL (10). High-level amikacin resistance was more frequent in blaSPM-positive isolates due to the frequent coproduction of RmtD. MICs of ciprofloxacin were variable regardless of the presence or absence of blaSPM. Some isolates with elevated colistin MICs (8 to 16 μg/ml) were observed in both groups, which differed from a previous study that reported 100% susceptibility to this agent for imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates in Brazil (6).

In summary, our study demonstrates that the coproduction of SPM-1 and RmtD is a common phenomenon observed in half of the imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates in hospitals in São Paulo, Brazil. A recent nationwide surveillance study from Brazil reported that as many as 37% of P. aeruginosa isolates recovered in Brazilian hospitals were resistant to imipenem (7). Furthermore, it was also reported that MIC90s of amikacin, tobramycin, and gentamicin against P. aeruginosa were all greater than 256 μg/ml. Our findings, coupled with those surveillance data, suggest that high-level aminoglycoside resistance mediated by the production of 16S rRNA methylase may already be disseminated in Brazilian hospitals.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

PFGE patterns of the study isolates. The pulsotypes were aligned using Bionumerics software version 4.0 (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Characteristics of study isolates

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

MICs of imipenem, meropenem, aztreonam, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, and colistin in the presence or absence of blaSPM

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

MICs of aminoglycosides in the presence or absence of rmtD

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported in part by a Fogarty International Center Global Infectious Diseases Research Training Program grant from the National Institutes of Health (grant 5D43TW006592; principal investigator, Lee H. Harrison). Y.D. was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grant T32 AI007333.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 30 March 2007.
    • Returned for modification 13 May 2007.
    • Accepted 11 June 2007.
  • Copyright © 2007 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Arakawa, Y., N. Shibata, K. Shibayama, H. Kurokawa, T. Yagi, H. Fujiwara, and M. Goto. 2000. Convenient test for screening metallo-β-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacteria by using thiol compounds. J. Clin. Microbiol.38:40-43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2006. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard, M7-A7. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  3. 3.↵
    Doi, Y., and Y. Arakawa. 2007. 16S ribosomal RNA methylation: emerging resistance mechanism against aminoglycosides. Clin. Infect. Dis.45:88-94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Doi, Y., D. de Oliveira Garcia, J. Adams, and D. L. Paterson. 2007. Coproduction of novel 16S rRNA methylase RmtD and metallo-β-lactamase SPM-1 in a panresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate from Brazil. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.51:852-856.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Doi, Y., J. Wachino, K. Yamane, N. Shibata, T. Yagi, K. Shibayama, H. Kato, and Y. Arakawa. 2004. Spread of novel aminoglycoside resistance gene aac(6′)-Iad among Acinetobacter clinical isolates in Japan. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.48:2075-2080.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Gales, A. C., L. C. Menezes, S. Silbert, and H. S. Sader. 2003. Dissemination in distinct Brazilian regions of an epidemic carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing SPM metallo-β-lactamase. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.52:699-702.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Kiffer, C., A. Hsiung, C. Oplustil, J. Sampaio, E. Sakagami, P. Turner, C. Mendes, and the MYSTIC Brazil Group. 2005. Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-negative bacteria in Brazilian hospitals: the MYSTIC Program Brazil 2003. Braz. J. Infect. Dis.9:216-224.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Lee, H., D. Yong, J. H. Yum, K. H. Roh, K. Lee, K. Yamane, Y. Arakawa, and Y. Chong. 2006. Dissemination of 16S rRNA methylase-mediated highly amikacin-resistant isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii in Korea. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.56:305-312.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Mao, W., M. S. Warren, A. Lee, A. Mistry, and O. Lomovskaya. 2001. MexXY-OprM efflux pump is required for antagonism of aminoglycosides by divalent cations in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.45:2001-2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Nordmann, P., and L. Poirel. 2002. Emerging carbapenemases in gram-negative aerobes. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.8:321-331.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Pitout, J. D., D. B. Gregson, L. Poirel, J. A. McClure, P. Le, and D. L. Church. 2005. Detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing metallo-β-lactamases in a large centralized laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol.43:3129-3135.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Rossolini, G. M., and E. Mantengoli. 2005. Treatment and control of severe infections caused by multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.11(Suppl. 4):17-32.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    Sader, H. S., A. O. Reis, S. Silbert, and A. C. Gales. 2005. IMPs, VIMs and SPMs: the diversity of metallo-β-lactamases produced by carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Brazilian hospital. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.11:73-76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Tenover, F. C., R. D. Arbeit, R. V. Goering, P. A. Mickelsen, B. E. Murray, D. H. Persing, and B. Swaminathan. 1995. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J. Clin. Microbiol.33:2233-2239.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Toleman, M. A., A. M. Simm, T. A. Murphy, A. C. Gales, D. J. Biedenbach, R. N. Jones, and T. R. Walsh. 2002. Molecular characterization of SPM-1, a novel metallo-β-lactamase isolated in Latin America: report from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance programme. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.50:673-679.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
High Prevalence of Metallo-β-Lactamase and 16S rRNA Methylase Coproduction among Imipenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates in Brazil
Yohei Doi, Angela C. R. Ghilardi, Jennifer Adams, Doroti de Oliveira Garcia, David L. Paterson
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Aug 2007, 51 (9) 3388-3390; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00443-07

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
High Prevalence of Metallo-β-Lactamase and 16S rRNA Methylase Coproduction among Imipenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates in Brazil
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
High Prevalence of Metallo-β-Lactamase and 16S rRNA Methylase Coproduction among Imipenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates in Brazil
Yohei Doi, Angela C. R. Ghilardi, Jennifer Adams, Doroti de Oliveira Garcia, David L. Paterson
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Aug 2007, 51 (9) 3388-3390; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00443-07
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Drug Resistance, Bacterial
imipenem
Methyltransferases
Pseudomonas Infections
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
beta-lactamases

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596