Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mechanisms of Resistance

Potential Basis for Amphotericin B Resistance in Aspergillus terreus

Gerhard Blum, Susanne Perkhofer, Hubertus Haas, Markus Schrettl, Reinhard Würzner, Manfred P. Dierich, Cornelia Lass-Flörl
Gerhard Blum
1Department of Hygiene, Microbiology and Social Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susanne Perkhofer
1Department of Hygiene, Microbiology and Social Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hubertus Haas
2Division of Molecular Biology, Innsbruck Biocenter, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Markus Schrettl
2Division of Molecular Biology, Innsbruck Biocenter, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Reinhard Würzner
1Department of Hygiene, Microbiology and Social Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manfred P. Dierich
1Department of Hygiene, Microbiology and Social Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cornelia Lass-Flörl
1Department of Hygiene, Microbiology and Social Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: cornelia.lass-floerl@i-med.ac.at
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01280-07
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

This study investigated the basis for intrinsic amphotericin B (AMB) resistance in Aspergillus terreus. The ergosterol content, cell wall composition, and lipid peroxidation level had no influence on AMB resistance. The level of catalase production in A. terreus was significantly higher than that in A. fumigatus (P < 0.05). This higher-level production may contribute to AMB resistance in A. terreus since oxidative damage has been implicated in AMB action.

Invasive aspergillosis has emerged as a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients (7). Aspergillus terreus in particular is an amphotericin B (AMB)-resistant mold that has been recognized as a cause of frequently lethal infections (25). The exact mechanism of AMB action is still incompletely understood. Previous work has shown that AMB binds to the ergosterol in the fungal cell membrane; this step introduces aqueous pores into the lipid bilayers, and thus small ions leak out, causing a disruption of the proton gradient (24). Others have demonstrated AMB to cause cell death by oxidative damage (21). AMB is active against a wide range of fungi, yet certain species, such as A. terreus and Pseudallescheria boydii, are intrinsically resistant to AMB (7, 17, 22, 23). Manavathu et al. (14) generated AMB-resistant mutants of Aspergillus fumigatus by UV radiation. Alternatively, resistant isolates have been collected by repeated subculturing on agar containing increasing amounts of polyene compounds (24). It has been suggested previously that for Aspergillus flavus and Candida albicans, the ergosterol content, the composition of the fungal cell wall, and the ability to produce catalase may play a role in AMB resistance (15, 20, 21). So far, the reason for the in vitro and in vivo AMB resistance in A. terreus is not known. This study examined the basis for AMB resistance in A. terreus.

Clinical isolates of AMB-sensitive A. fumigatus (n = 10) and AMB-resistant A. terreus (n = 10) were used in this study. AMB susceptibility testing was performed according to the CLSI (formerly NCCLS) M38-A technique (16). In parallel, we prepared cell wall-free Aspergillus protoplasts that were AMB sensitive (MIC < 1 μg/ml) and resistant (MIC > 2 μg/ml); protoplast preparation, including the determination of the regeneration rate, was done according to a protocol of Hearn et al. (10). MIC testing with protoplasts was performed in RPMI 1640 containing 0.55 M sorbitol as a stabilizer. Our results provide evidence that AMB resistance in A. terreus is not associated with the cell wall, as MICs for conidia and cell wall-free fungi did not differ. The mean AMB MICs for conidia and protoplasts of A. fumigatus were 0.21 ± 0.06 and 0.19 ± 0.05 μg/mg, and those for conidia and protoplasts of A. terreus were 1.70 ± 0.58 and 1.41 ± 0.38 μg/mg, respectively.

Fungal ergosterol was analyzed by a previously published method with slight modifications (2, 4). Fifty milliliters of Sabouraud medium (Merck, Vienna, Austria) was inoculated with 106 conidia and incubated for 24 h with shaking (200 rpm) at 35°C. Subsequently, fungi were harvested by vacuum filtration, and the wet weight was determined; the pellet was minced with a blade, 6 ml of 25% alcoholic potassium hydroxide solution was added and mixed for 2 min, and the mixture was incubated at 85°C for 3 h. Sterols were extracted by adding 2 ml of sterile water and 6 ml of n-heptane, mixing for 4 min, and allowing the layers to separate for 2 h. The n-heptane layer was used for spectrophotometric analysis between 240 and 300 nm with a Beckmann spectrophotometer, and the ergosterol content was calculated as previously described (2). Overall, the data on fungal ergosterol contents and AMB resistance are contradictory: Sterling and Merz (22) and Dick et al. (9) showed that AMB resistance in yeasts is based on the absence or the reduction of fungal ergosterol; changes in the sterols and phospholipids affect membrane fluidity and, thus, decrease AMB impact (19). By contrast, Joseph-Horne et al. proposed non-sterol-related mechanisms of AMB resistance in Ustilago maydis (11); the ergosterol contents do not vary between sensitive and resistant strains. Based on in vivo and biochemical in vitro studies, Dannaoui et al. (7) and Walsh et al. (25) suggested that the AMB resistance of A. terreus is not related to a lack of fungal ergosterol. Our data also suggested that the ergosterol content does not explain AMB resistance. The mean ergosterol contents for A. fumigatus and A. terreus were 4.4 ± 1.4 and 5.1 ± 2.4 μg/mg, respectively.

It is speculated that AMB leads to cell death by acting as an oxidizing agent (21, 24). Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which permeates freely through biological membranes, potentially causes cell damage by lipid peroxidation (12). Therefore, hyphal lipid peroxidation and endogenous catalase levels were measured using the thiobarbituric acid test for malonaldehyde (6, 18) and the H2O2 degradation test (1); the decrease in absorbance at a wavelength of 240 nm over 30 s was recorded (5), and the protein concentration was determined with the Bradford method (3). There were no clear differences in lipid peroxidation levels at moderate AMB concentrations between A. fumigatus and A. terreus (Fig. 1A). However, the addition of 5 and 10 μg of AMB/ml resulted in significantly higher levels of lipid peroxidation in A. fumigatus than in A. terreus. Catalases are ubiquitous metalloenzymes in aerobic organisms and protect cells from oxidative damage by converting H2O2 into 2H2O and O2. Sokol-Anderson et al. demonstrated oxidative damage to be involved in the AMB-induced killing of C. albicans (21). This effect was stopped by the addition of exogenous catalase. Our results show that A. terreus produced significantly more catalase than A. fumigatus (Fig. 1B), a finding which may play a role in the AMB resistance. A. terreus may be able to catch toxic H2O2 and transform it into less toxic substances before H2O2 can harm the fungus. Differences in oxidative-stress-buffering capacity may underlie the differential susceptibilities to AMB.

This study shows that ergosterol content and cell wall composition do not play a crucial role in the AMB resistance of A. terreus. In contrast, catalase activity in A. terreus was significantly stronger than that in A. fumigatus (P < 0.05). The level of lipid peroxidation was higher in A. fumigatus, yet only at very high AMB concentrations. Catalase may be one of the several reactive-oxidant scavengers playing a role in AMB resistance in A. terreus.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

(A) Lipid peroxidation induced by increasing concentrations of AMB in A. fumigatus (black columns) and A. terreus (gray columns) hyphae (24-h culture), as measured by the quantification of malonaldehyde (MDA) after 8 h of incubation. Significant differences were seen at high AMB concentrations (5 and 10 μg/ml) (P < 0.01). (B) Hyphal catalase activity of A. fumigatus (black columns) and A. terreus (gray columns). Fungi were incubated at 37°C for 24 and 48 h and tested for catalase activity (*, P < 0.01; **, P < 0.05). Differences between means were analyzed by Student's t test. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 3 October 2007.
    • Returned for modification 29 November 2007.
    • Accepted 30 January 2008.
  • Copyright © 2008 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Aebi, H. 1984. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol.105:121-126.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    Arthington-Skaggs, B. A., H. Jradi, T. Desai, and C. J. Morrison. 1999. Quantitation of ergosterol content: novel method for determination of fluconazole susceptibility of Candida albicans. J. Clin. Microbiol.37:3332-3337.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem.72:248-254.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Breivik, O. N., and J. L. Owades. 1957. Spectrophotometric semi-microdetermination of ergosterol in yeast. Agric. Food Chem.5:360-363.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    Buckova, M., J. Godocikova, A. Simonovicova, and B. Polek. 2005. Production of catalases by Aspergillus niger isolates as a response to pollutant stress by heavy metals. Curr. Microbiol.50:175-179.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Buege, J. A., and S. D. Aust. 1978. Microsomal lipid peroxidation. Methods Enzymol.52:302-310.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Dannaoui, E., E. Borel, F. Persat, M. A. Piens, and S. Picot. 1999. Amphotericin B resistance of Aspergillus terreus in a murine model of disseminated aspergillosis. J. Med. Microbiol.49:601-606.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.
    Dannaoui, E., F. Persat, M. F. Monier, E. Borel, M. A. Piens, and S. Picot. 1999. In-vitro susceptibility of Aspergillus spp. isolates to amphotericin B and itraconazole. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.44:553-555.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Reference deleted.
  10. 10.↵
    Hearn, V. M., E. V. Wilson, and D. W. Mackenzie. 1980. The preparation of protoplasts from Aspergillus fumigatus mycelium. Sabouraudia18:75-77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Joseph-Horne, T., N. Manning, D. Holoman, and S. Kelly. 1996. Nonsterol related resistance in Ustilago maydis to the polyene antifungals, amphotericin B and nystatin. Phytochemistry42:637-639.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Kagan, V. E. 1988. Lipid peroxidation in biomembranes. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL.
  13. 13.
    Kawasaki, L., D. Wysong, R. Diamond, and J. Aguirre. 1997. Two divergent catalase genes are differentially regulated during Aspergillus nidulans development and oxidative stress. J. Bacteriol.179:3284-3292.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Reference deleted.
  15. 15.↵
    Moore, C. B., D. Law, and D. W. Denning. 1993. In-vitro activity of the new triazole D0870 compared with amphotericin B and itraconazole against Aspergillus spp. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.32:831-836.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2002. Reference methods for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi. Approved standard M38-A. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA.
  17. 17.↵
    Oakley, K. L., C. B. Moore, and D. W. Denning. 1999. Comparison of in vitro activity of liposomal nystatin against Aspergillus species with those of nystatin, amphotericin B (AB) deoxycholate, AB colloidal dispersion, liposomal AB, AB lipid complex, and itraconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.43:1264-1266.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Peever, T. L., and V. J. Higgins. 1989. Electrolyte leakage, lipoxygenase, and lipid peroxidation induced in tomato leaf tissue by specific and nonspecific elicitors from Cladosporium fulvum. Plant Physiol.90:867-875.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Pierce, A. M., H. D. Pierce, A. M. Unrau, and A. C. Oehlschlager. 1978. Lipid composition and polyene antibiotic resistance of Candida albicans mutants. Can. J. Biochem.56:135-142.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    Seo, K., H. Akiyoshi, and Y. Ohnishi. 1999. Alteration of cell wall composition leads to amphotericin B resistance in Aspergillus flavus. Microbiol. Immunol.43:1017-1025.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    Sokol-Anderson, M. L., J. Brajtburg, and G. Medoff. 1986. Amphotericin B-induced oxidative damage and killing of Candida albicans. J. Infect. Dis.154:76-83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Sterling, T. R., and W. G. Merz. 1998. Resistance to amphotericin B: emerging clinical and microbiological patterns. Drug Resist. Updat.1:161-165.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    Sutton, D. A., S. E. Sanche, S. G. Revankar, A. W. Fothergill, and M. G. Rinaldi. 1999. In vitro amphotericin B resistance in clinical isolates of Aspergillus terreus, with a head-to-head comparison to voriconazole. J. Clin. Microbiol.37:2343-2345.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    Vanden Bossche, H., D. W. Warnock, B. Dupont, D. Kerridge, S. Sen Gupta, L. Improvisi, P. Marichal, F. C. Odds, F. Provost, and O. Ronin. 1994. Mechanisms and clinical impact of antifungal drug resistance. J. Med. Vet. Mycol.32:189-202.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    Walsh, T. J., V. Petraitis, R. Petraitiene, A. Field-Ridley, D. Sutton, M. Ghannoum, T. Sein, R. Schaufele, J. Peter, J. Bacher, H. Armstrong, A. Espinel-Ingroff, M. G. Rinaldi, and C. A. Lyman. 2003. Experimental pulmonary aspergillosis due to Aspergillus terreus: pathogenesis and treatment of an emerging fungal pathogen resistant to amphotericin B. J. Infect. Dis.188:305-319.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Potential Basis for Amphotericin B Resistance in Aspergillus terreus
Gerhard Blum, Susanne Perkhofer, Hubertus Haas, Markus Schrettl, Reinhard Würzner, Manfred P. Dierich, Cornelia Lass-Flörl
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Mar 2008, 52 (4) 1553-1555; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01280-07

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Potential Basis for Amphotericin B Resistance in Aspergillus terreus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Potential Basis for Amphotericin B Resistance in Aspergillus terreus
Gerhard Blum, Susanne Perkhofer, Hubertus Haas, Markus Schrettl, Reinhard Würzner, Manfred P. Dierich, Cornelia Lass-Flörl
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Mar 2008, 52 (4) 1553-1555; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01280-07
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

amphotericin B
antifungal agents
Aspergillus
catalase
Drug Resistance, Fungal

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596