Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mechanisms of Resistance

First Molecular Characterization of Group B Streptococci with Reduced Penicillin Susceptibility

Kouji Kimura, Satowa Suzuki, Jun-ichi Wachino, Hiroshi Kurokawa, Kunikazu Yamane, Naohiro Shibata, Noriyuki Nagano, Haru Kato, Keigo Shibayama, Yoshichika Arakawa
Kouji Kimura
1Department of Bacterial Pathogenesis and Infection Control, National Institute of Infectious Disease, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Satowa Suzuki
1Department of Bacterial Pathogenesis and Infection Control, National Institute of Infectious Disease, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jun-ichi Wachino
1Department of Bacterial Pathogenesis and Infection Control, National Institute of Infectious Disease, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiroshi Kurokawa
1Department of Bacterial Pathogenesis and Infection Control, National Institute of Infectious Disease, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kunikazu Yamane
1Department of Bacterial Pathogenesis and Infection Control, National Institute of Infectious Disease, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Naohiro Shibata
1Department of Bacterial Pathogenesis and Infection Control, National Institute of Infectious Disease, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Noriyuki Nagano
1Department of Bacterial Pathogenesis and Infection Control, National Institute of Infectious Disease, Tokyo, Japan
2Medical Microbiology Laboratory, Funabashi Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Haru Kato
1Department of Bacterial Pathogenesis and Infection Control, National Institute of Infectious Disease, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keigo Shibayama
1Department of Bacterial Pathogenesis and Infection Control, National Institute of Infectious Disease, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoshichika Arakawa
1Department of Bacterial Pathogenesis and Infection Control, National Institute of Infectious Disease, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: yarakawa@nih.go.jp
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00185-08
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Group B streptococci (GBS; Streptococcus agalactiae) are the leading cause of neonatal invasive diseases and are also important pathogens for adults. Penicillins are the drugs of first choice for the treatment of GBS infections, since GBS have been regarded to be uniformly susceptible to penicillins so far. Here we characterize the first strains of GBS with reduced penicillin susceptibility (PRGBS) identified in Japan. Fourteen PRGBS strains were clinically isolated from the sputa of elderly patients from 1995 to 2005; and the MICs of penicillin, oxacillin, and ceftizoxime ranged from 0.25 to 1 μg/ml, 2 to 8 μg/ml, and 4 to 128 μg/ml, respectively. Moreover, some strains were also insusceptible to ampicillin, cefazolin, cefepime, and cefotaxime. All the PRGBS isolates tested possessed a few amino acid substitutions adjacent to the conserved SSN and KSG motifs (amino acids 402 to 404 and 552 to 554, respectively) of PBP 2X, and the amino acid substitutions could be classified into two types, Q557E and V405A. Western blotting analysis of the 14 clinical isolates with anti-PBP 2X-specific serum suggested that the amount of PBP 2X among the 14 PRGBS isolates was reduced, although the 2 ATCC strains produced a significant amount of PBP 2X. The introduction of PRGBS-derived PBP 2X genes into penicillin-susceptible strains through allelic exchange elevated their penicillin insusceptibility, suggesting that these altered PBP 2X genes are responsible for the penicillin insusceptibility in PRGBS strains. In this study, we characterized for the first time PRGBS strains on a molecular basis, although several reports have so far mentioned the existence of β-lactam-insusceptible GBS from a phenotypic standpoint.

Group B streptococci (GBS; Streptococcus agalactiae) are the leading cause of neonatal sepsis and meningitis. Because GBS cause high rates of mortality and morbidity in neonates and no licensed vaccines are available, the use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis has been recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and others (1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 14, 15, 16, 21, 22, 23), and the rate of early-onset GBS infections (during the first postnatal week) but the rate of not late-onset GBS infections has been lowered (20).

On the other hand, GBS are also important pathogens that infect both pregnant women and nonpregnant adults, especially elderly people and those with underlying medical disorders (2, 10, 15, 22). Elderly adults account for >40% of persons with invasive GBS disease and for >50% of GBS-associated deaths (9). Moreover, GBS disease in adults is frequently nosocomial and may be related to the placement of an intravenous catheter (11).

Penicillins, including penicillin G, are the first-line agents for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis and also the treatment of GBS infections in adults, since all clinically isolated GBS have been considered to be uniformly susceptible to β-lactams, including penicillins (2, 22). Actually, no criteria for “penicillin resistance” have been established so far by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI; formerly the NCCLS) (6), and no report of penicillin nonsusceptibility or insusceptibility in a GBS strain has been clearly confirmed on a molecular basis to date.

In this study, we identified and characterized 14 clinical GBS isolates that acquired reduced penicillin susceptibility (MICs, 0.25 to 1 μg/ml) and ceftizoxime insusceptibility (MICs, 4 to 128 μg/ml) and that were isolated in 12 geographically separate hospitals in Japan from 1995 to 1998 and in 2005 (17).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains and identification of GBS.The properties of 3 control strains and 14 strains of GBS with reduced penicillin susceptibility (PRGBS) isolated clinically are listed in Table 1. Nine PRGBS strains were isolated from 1995 to 1998 and were kept until this study. Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619 was a quality control strain used for measurement of the MICs of the antimicrobial agents tested. To obtain candidate PRGBS strains, we screened all 159 clinical isolates sent to a clinical laboratory from various Japanese clinical facilities over 3 days in 2005. We initially predicted that the PRGBS candidates would show reduced susceptibility to some β-lactams as a result of mutations in penicillin-binding protein (PBP) genes, since penicillin-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae usually demonstrate resistance to oxacillin. Thus, we selected from among the 159 clinical isolates 49 isolates which showed oxacillin MICs of >2 μg/ml by the microdilution method. We further selected from among the 49 isolates 5 isolates that demonstrated high levels of resistance to β-lactams. We analyzed both the nine clinical isolates stocked before 1998 and the five new clinical strains isolated in 2005. All 14 strains were isolated from the sputa of individual patients, most of whom were elderly patients, at 12 geographically separate hospitals in Japan from 1995 to 1998 and in 2005. None of the PRGBS candidates were isolated from sterile body sites such as blood or cerebrospinal fluid. All clinical isolates were subjected to multiple tests for the exact identification of GBS, including Gram staining, 16S rRNA PCR followed by restriction enzyme-digested fingerprinting, biochemical identification, surface antigen detection and the CAMP test, with Streptococcus agalactiae ATCC BAA-611 and S. agalactiae ATCC 12403 used as the positive controls. PCR amplification of 16S rRNA and restriction enzyme-digested fingerprinting were performed as described previously (18). Biochemical identification was performed with the API 20 Strep system (bioMérieux) and surface antigen detection was performed by the Slidex strep test (bioMérieux) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Serotyping was performed with anti-GBS serotype-specific serum (Denka Seiken). Notably, 8 of the 14 strains were serotype III (Table 1), a well-known major serotype found in strains causing neonatal meningitis in Western countries, although serotypes VI and VIII are the predominant types among Japanese clinical isolates.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Strains used in this study

Measurement of MICs.Measurement of the MICs of penicillin G, penicillin V, ampicillin, oxacillin, cefazolin, cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftizoxime, and meropenem were performed by the agar dilution method, as recommended by the CLSI (6). A penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae strain, ATCC 49619, was used as the quality control strain for measurement of the exact MICs.

PFGE.Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of the 14 clinical isolates of PRGBS was performed as described previously (13), with minor modifications. The restriction enzyme used in the PFGE experiment was ApaI. Run conditions were generated by the autoalgorithm mode of the CHEF Mapper PFGE system with a size range of 20 to 200 kb.

Sequencing of high-molecular-weight PBP genes.Five genes encoding high-molecular-weight PBPs (PBP 1A, PBP 1B, PBP 2A, PBP 2B, and PBP 2X) were amplified by DNA polymerase Pyrobest (Takara) by using genomic DNA as the template. The PCR conditions were as follows: 1 cycle of 98°C for 1 min; 30 cycles of 98°C for 10 s, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min 30 s; and 1 cycle of 72°C for 7 min. The mixture was then held at 4°C. Purified PCR products were obtained with a Wizard SV gel and PCR clean-up system (Promega), followed by sequencing reactions and analysis with an ABI Prism 3100 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems). The primers used for amplification of the PBP genes and sequencing are listed in Table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Primers used for PCR amplification and sequencing

Visualization and Western blotting analysis of PBPs.Membrane fractions were prepared from the ATCC strains and the clinical isolates as described previously (24). The membrane fraction (400 μg) was incubated with 12.5 mM of fluorescence-conjugated penicillin V (Bocillin FL; Molecular Probes) at 37°C for 30 min and a 3× sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer was added, followed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) analysis with a fluorescent image analyzer (LAS-3000 multicolor; Fuji).

Western blotting analysis was performed with rabbit anti-PBP 2X serum raised against a keyhole limpet hemocyanin-conjugated peptide corresponding to the 14 amino acid residues of PBP 2X (amino acids 237 to 250), which is a very conserved region that lacks mutations even in PRGBS.

Allelic exchange experiments.To generate S. agalactiae ATCC BAA-611 integrant strains harboring the chromosomally encoded PBP 2X genes derived from the clinically isolated PRGBS strains, we performed allelic exchange experiments, as described previously (4). A thermosensitive Escherichia coli-streptococcus shuttle vector, pG+host6, was modified by removing the Eam1105I-Aat II fragment to delete its penicillinase gene, and the resultant vector was designated pG+host6Δamp. To generate targeting vectors, fragments containing the nucleotide region from positions 295821 to 297819 of the GBS ATCC BAA-611 genome were amplified from the chromosomal DNA of clinical isolates B12 and B503 with Pyrobest DNA polymerase (Takara) and ligated into pG+host6Δamp. Several inserts were sequenced, and no additional mutation was found in the inserts. Electrocompetent cells were made from S. agalactiae ATCC BAA-611 as described previously (12). One microgram of the targeting vector was introduced into electrocompetent cells derived from GBS strain BAA-611, as described previously (12), and transformants were selected on agar plates containing 0.5 μg/ml of erythromycin at 30°C. To obtain integrant cells in which the targeting vectors had integrated into the chromosomes of the recipient GBS cells, transformants were incubated in liquid medium containing 5 μg/ml of erythromycin at 37°C, as described elsewhere (4). Such integrant strains were successively cultivated for 3 days in liquid medium at 30°C without erythromycin selection to facilitate the excision of vector pG+host6Δamp. Integrant strains were selected on an agar plate containing 4 μg/ml of ceftizoxime, and susceptibility to erythromycin was confirmed by use of an agar plate containing 5 μg/ml of erythromycin. The presence of the altered PBP 2X gene in each integrant strain was confirmed by sequencing, and the integrant strains were subjected to MIC measurements.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.All high-molecular-weight PBP genes derived from the 14 clinical isolates were deposited in the EMBL/GenBank database through the DDBJ database and were assigned accession numbers AB279794 to AB279863.

RESULTS

Confirmatory identification of GBS.From among the 159 clinical strains isolated in 2005, we selected 49 isolates for which the oxacillin MICs were >2 μg/ml by the microdilution method. We also selected from among these 49 isolates 5 isolates that demonstrated high-level resistance to β-lactams. We analyzed nine stocked from 1995 to 1998 and five clinical isolates isolated in 2005. The identities of the 14 clinical isolates were confirmed to be S. agalactiae by Gram staining, 16S rRNA PCR followed by restriction enzyme-digested fingerprinting (18), biochemical identification, surface antigen detection, and the CAMP test.

These 14 strains were gram-positive cocci, and no apparent morphological abnormalities were observed at the light microscopy level when the strains were cultured without penicillins (data not shown). The partial 16S RNA gene amplified from chromosomal DNA was fingerprinted with the HaeIII restriction enzyme. The fingerprinting patterns of the 14 strains were identical to those of the standard strains of S. agalactiae obtained from ATCC (ATCC BAA-611 and ATCC 12403) (data not shown). All 14 clinical isolates showed biochemical properties consistent with those of S. agalactiae. We further performed the streptococcus grouping latex agglutination test with anti-streptococcus-specific surface antigen serum and confirmed the validity of the identification. Finally, the CAMP test, a GBS-specific identification test which detects the production of GBS-specific CAMP factor, confirmed that all the clinical isolates showed the typical phenotype of GBS. The several assays mentioned above clearly showed that these strains must be S. agalactiae.

PFGE.We performed PFGE with the 14 clinical isolates (Fig. 1). All clinical isolates except B10 and B12 showed different DNA band patterns, suggesting that all clinical isolates except B10 and B12 were genetically nonrelated strains. Interestingly, B10 and B12, which were clinical isolates from the same hospital, showed very similar DNA band patterns, implying their clonal relatedness.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

PFGE of 14 clinical isolates (isolates in lanes B1 to B516). Lanes M, molecular markers.

Measurement of β-lactam MICs.We determined the MICs of several β-lactams for the 14 strains by the agar dilution method recommended by the CLSI (Table 3). The MICs for the control strain, S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619, fulfilled the criteria for “quality control” established by the CLSI. All 14 strains, however, showed reduced susceptibilities to penicillin G (0.25 to 1 μg/ml), oxacillin (2 to 8 μg/ml), and ceftizoxime (4 to 128 μg/ml). Some strains were also “insusceptible” to ampicillin (0.12 to 0.5 μg/ml), cefazolin (0.5 to 2 μg/ml), cefepime (0.25 to 1 μg/ml), and cefotaxime (0.12 to 2 μg/ml).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

MICs of nine β-lactams for clinical PRGBS isolates

Genes for high-molecular-weight PBPs.Alterations in the high-molecular-weight PBPs are widely acknowledged to be the leading molecular mechanisms of resistance to β-lactams in S. pneumoniae. To obtain deduced amino acid sequences of the PBPs of the 14 GBS strains, we analyzed the nucleotide sequences of the coding regions for five high-molecular-weight PBPs (PBP 1A, PBP 1B, PBP 2A, PBP 2B, and PBP 2X) (Fig. 2). Some of the 14 clinical isolates possessed a few mutations in PBP 1A (0 to 3 amino acid substitutions and 0 to 4 amino acid deletions and 0 to 10 nucleotide substitutions and 0 to 12 nucleotide deletions), PBP 1B (0 to 1 amino acid substitution and 0 to 4 nucleotide substitutions), PBP 2A (0 to 2 amino acid substitutions and 2 to 11 nucleotide substitutions), and PBP 2B (0 to 1 amino acid substitution and 0 to 2 nucleotide substitutions) (Fig. 2A). On the other hand, all 14 clinical isolates possessed several deduced amino acid substitutions in PBP 2X (2 to 7 amino acid substitutions and 2 to 10 nucleotide substitutions) adjacent to the conserved SSN and KSG motifs (amino acids 402 to 404 and 552 to 554, respectively), considered to form the active site of the enzyme (Fig. 2B and C). PBP 2X of PRGBS did not have a mosaic structure like that of the PBPs of penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae strains. The amino acid substitutions found in PBP 2X of PRGBS could be classified into two types, Q557E and V405A. Among the 14 clinical isolates, all isolates except isolate B7 possessed at least one of these two amino acid substitutions, which existed adjacent to the conserved active-site motifs of PBP 2X. The Q557E of PBP 2X in PRGBS corresponded to the Q552E of PBP 2X found in penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae strains because the amino acid sequence of PBP 2X in GBS showed 74% similarity to that in S. pneumoniae R6, and the three active-site motifs in PBP 2X were well conserved between the GBS strains and S. pneumoniae. These results indicate that alterations in PBP 2X existing around the regions corresponding to the active-site motifs are the critical determinants responsible for the reduced susceptibility to penicillin G, oxacillin, and ceftizoxime among the penicillin-insusceptible GBS strains.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Deduced amino acid sequences of high-molecular-weight PBPs of control strains (strains ATCC BAA-611 and ATCC 12403) and clinical isolates (isolates B1 to B516). (A and B) Deduced amino acid sequences of high-molecular-weight PBPs (PBP 1A, PBP 1B, PBP 2A, PBP 2B, and PBP 2X). The numbers above the sequences indicate the position number of the amino acid sequence. The blanks and dashes indicate no substitution and deletional change of amino acid, respectively. (C) Pattern diagram of PBP 2X. Common amino acid substitution types V405A and Q557E exist adjacent to active site motifs SSN and KSG, respectively.

Visualization and identification of PBPs.To elucidate the resistance mechanisms on a molecular basis, we next visualized the PBPs using fluorescent-conjugated penicillin V, Bocillin FL. Membrane fractions prepared from the 14 clinical strains and the 2 ATCC strains were incubated with Bocillin FL, followed by SDS-PAGE and detection with a fluorescent image analyzer (Fig. 3A and B). The two ATCC strains possessed six apparent PBPs, but one band was eliminated from among all 14 clinical strains, demonstrating penicillin insusceptibility. To identify the eliminated band, we generated rabbit anti-PBP 2X serum by immunization with a synthetic peptide corresponding to the 14 amino acid residues of PBP 2X (amino acids 237 to 250), which is a very conserved region lacking mutations even in PRGBS. Western blotting analysis of the membrane fraction prepared from the two ATCC strains revealed that the band that was commonly eliminated among the 14 clinical strains corresponded exactly to PBP 2X (data not shown).

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Visualization of PBPs and Western blotting of PBP 2X from control strains (strains ATCC BAA-611 and ATCC 12403) and clinical isolates (isolates B1 to B516). (A and B) Visualized PBPs. Membrane fractions derived from strains were incubated with fluorescent-conjugated penicillin, followed by SDS-PAGE on a 10% (A) or 6% (B) polyacrylamide gel. Arrows indicate the band corresponding to PBP 2X. (C) Western blotting of PBP 2X. Western blotting analysis was performed with membrane fractions derived from strains and rabbit anti-PBP 2X serum.

Western blotting analysis of the 14 clinical isolates with anti-PBP 2X-specific serum revealed that the level of production of PBP 2X among the 14 clinical isolates was reduced or eliminated, although the two ATCC strains possessed a significant amount of PBP 2X (Fig. 3C).

Allelic exchange with PRGBS-derived PBP 2X gene.Finally, to assess the contribution of the altered PBP 2X genes to the elevation of penicillin insusceptibility, the PBP 2X genes derived from penicillin-insusceptible clinical isolates were introduced into a β-lactam-susceptible GBS strain, strain ATCC BAA-611, through allelic exchange experiments. One clinical isolate with either type of altered PBP 2X, strain B12 for the Q557E type and strain B503 for the V405A type, was selected, because these strains showed the least number of alterations in the PBP 2X genes. Each type of altered PBP 2X gene from a penicillin-insusceptible strain was transformed into ATCC BAA-611 by integration (Table 4). The MICs for these integrated strains revealed that the reduced susceptibilities to penicillin G, oxacillin, and ceftizoxime were comparable to those of the parental clinical isolates. These results confirmed that both types of altered PBP 2X genes (types Q557E and V405A) are the major determinants of reduced susceptibility to penicillin G, oxacillin, and ceftizoxime in GBS.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4.

Elevation of MICs of nine β-lactams for integrants

DISCUSSION

According to the CLSI criteria, the existence of β-lactam-insusceptible strains of beta-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. other than S. pneumoniae has not been recognized so far (6). In the present study, however, the 14 clinical isolates, which were donated by geographically separate hospitals and which were not genetically related, obviously showed properties of “insusceptibility” to penicillin G. The MIC measurements revealed that the 14 clinical isolates investigated have MICs indicating penicillin-insusceptible properties (MICs, 0.25 to 1.0 μg/ml) greater than the MIC criteria for “susceptibility” to penicillin G (MICs, ≤0.12 μg/ml) for beta-hemolytic streptococci established by the CLSI. Previously, although several susceptibility test studies have indeed mentioned the existence of β-lactam-insusceptible GBS strains (3, 8, 19), none have intensively identified the GBS strains and investigated the resistance mechanisms on a molecular basis. Therefore, we definitely reidentified the GBS clinical isolates using several different methods, including Gram staining, 16S rRNA gene fingerprinting, biochemical analysis, the CAMP test, and surface antigen analysis. Thus, the present study is the first to confirm the existence of β-lactam-insusceptible strains of GBS (2. 6, 22).

In the present study, we obtained PRGBS candidates through screening using the oxacillin insusceptibility breakpoint of >2 μg/ml. However, the oxacillin MICs for the PRGBS strains were 2 to 8 μg/ml and the difference in the oxacillin MICs between the PRGBS and the penicillin-susceptible GBS strains was not as wide as we had expected. On the other hand, the ceftizoxime MICs for the PRGBS strains ranged from 4 to 128 μg/ml, and the difference in the ceftizoxime MICs for the PRGBS and the penicillin-susceptible GBS strains was much clearer than the difference in the oxacillin MICs. Therefore, we think that, at present, ceftizoxime would be a better agent for use for screening for PRGBS than oxacillin.

Interestingly, all PRGBS strains analyzed in this study were isolated from a nonsterile body site. Indeed, the possibility that PRGBS could lose the ability to cause invasive diseases may not be denied, but PRGBS strains colonizing a nonsterile body site may well translocate to a sterile body site, such as the bloodstream or cerebrospinal fluid. Therefore, it seems very important to screen GBS in clinical specimens taken even from a nonsterile body site, including both the upper respiratory and genital tracts, for reduced penicillin susceptibility.

In the present study, we confirmed through the allelic exchange experiments that the common substitutions found in PBP 2X, Q557E and/or V405A, in the 14 clinically isolated PRGBS strains were the crucial determinants of penicillin G insusceptibility in GBS. In addition, we found a reduced amount of PBP 2X in all PRGBS strains tested. While we consider that the amino acid substitutions in PBP 2X of PRGBS strains are necessary for penicillin insusceptibility in GBS, those amino acid substitutions might make PBP 2X unstable. Therefore, we assume that the amount of PBP 2X might have been reduced in the PRGBS strains due to the instability of the PBP 2X caused by amino acid substitutions. We assume that the reduction in the amount of PBP 2X is not necessarily responsible for penicillin insusceptibility in PRGBS and that the reduced binding ability of β-lactams to mutated PBP 2X of PRGBS would be a main cause of such penicillin insusceptibility. The reduction in the amount of PBP 2X found in PRGBS might simply be a secondary effect of amino acid substitutions in PBP 2X that might impair the stability of the tertiary structure of the altered PBP 2X molecule. Although the actual molecular mechanisms underlying the penicillin-insusceptible phenotype in GBS should be continuously investigated hereafter, the present study clearly demonstrated that the mutations in the PBP 2X gene are a leading cause of the penicillin-insusceptible phenotype in GBS.

Although the existence of β-lactam-insusceptible strains of GBS had not been confirmed until the present study, the collection of PRGBS strains identified in this study contained clinical isolates stocked from 1995 to 1998. Therefore, we consider that although PRGBS have indeed existed since the 1990s, it has not been confirmed and acknowledged to date. Actually, penicillin insusceptibility in GBS has not been identified thus far in daily clinical laboratory testing due to the absence of criteria for penicillin “resistance” for these microbes. Moreover, it would be difficult to detect PRGBS by routine laboratory testing with penicillin G and ampicillin because the levels of resistance of PRGBS to these agents are not very clear. Hence, the establishment of “resistance” criteria for GBS and the development of a feasible and reliable method for screening for reduced penicillin susceptibility in GBS are warranted.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by a grant (H18-Shinko-11) from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan. K.K. is a fellow of the Japan Health Sciences Foundation.

We thank Emmanuelle Maguin and Akihito Wada for providing thermosensitive shuttle vector pG+host6 and β-toxin-producing strain of S. aureus, respectively. We are grateful to Kumiko Kai, Yoshie Taki, and Fusako Yokokawa for technical assistance; Miyuki Asano, Hiroyuki Kidokoro, and Yoshiaki Sato for valuable advice regarding the clinical aspects; and Sayaka Takemoto-Kimura for constructive discussion and support.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 9 February 2008.
    • Returned for modification 8 March 2008.
    • Accepted 5 May 2008.
  • Copyright © 2008 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Disease, Committee on Fetus and Newborn. 1997. Revised guidelines for prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal (GBS) infection. Pediatrics99:489-496.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Baker, C. J. 2000. Group B streptococcal infections, p. 222-237. In D. L. Stevens and E. L. Kaplan (ed.), Streptococcal infections. Clinical aspects, microbiology, and molecular pathogenesis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
  3. 3.↵
    Berkowitz, K., J. A. Regan, and E. Greenberg. 1990. Antibiotic resistance patterns of group B streptococci in pregnant women. J. Clin. Microbiol.28:5-7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Biswas, I., A. Gruss, S. D. Ehrlich, and E. Maguin. 1993. High-efficiency gene inactivation and replacement system for gram-positive bacteria. J. Bacteriol.175:3628-3635.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2002. Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease. MMWR Recommend. Rep.51(RR-11):1-22.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2006. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, p. 138-140; 16th informational supplement M100-S16, vol. 26. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    Committee on Obstetric Practice. 1996. Prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal disease in newborns. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC.
  8. 8.↵
    De Azavedo, J. C. S., M. Mcgavin, C. Duncan, D. E. Low, and A. McGeer. 2001. Prevalence and mechanisms of macrolide resistance in invasive and noninvasive group B streptococcus isolates from Ontario, Canada. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.45:3504-3508.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Edwards, M. S., and C. J. Baker. 2005. Group B streptococcal infections in elderly adults. Clin. Infect. Dis.41:839-847.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Farley, M. M., R. C. Harvey, T. Stull, J. D. Smith, A. Schuchat, J. D. Wenger, and D. S. Stephens. 1993. A population-based assessment of invasive disease due to group B streptococcus in nonpregnant adults. N. Engl. J. Med.328:1807-1811.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Farley, M. M. 2001. Group B streptococcal disease in nonpregnant adults. Clin. Infect. Dis.33:556-561.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Framson, P. E., A. Nittayajarn, J. Merry, P. Youngman, and C. E. Rubens. 1997. New genetic techniques for group B streptococci: high-efficiency transformation, maintenance of temperature-sensitive pWV01 plasmids, and mutagenesis with Tn917. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.63:3539-3547.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Hansen, S. M., N. Uldbjerg, M. Kilian, and U. B. Skov Sorensen. 2004. Dynamics of Streptococcus agalactiae colonization in women during and after pregnancy and in their infants. J. Clin. Microbiol.42:83-89.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Heath, P. T., G. Balfour, A. M. Weisner, A. Efstratiou, T. L. Lamagni, H. Tighe, L. A. O'Connell, M. Cafferkey, N. Q. Verlander, A. Nicoll, A. C. McCartney, and PHLS Group B Streptococcus Working Group. 2004. Group B streptococcal disease in UK and Irish infants younger than 90 days. Lancet363:292-294.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Jackson, L. A., R. Hilsdon, M. M. Farley, L. H. Harrison, A. L. Reingold, B. D. Plikaytis, J. D. Wenger, and A. Schuchat. 1995. Risk factors for group B streptococcal disease in adults. Ann. Intern. Med.123:415-420.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Johri, A. K., L. C. Paoletti, P. Glaser, M. Dua, P. K. Sharma, G. Grandi, and R. Rappuoli. 2006. Group B streptococcus: global incidence and vaccine development. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.4:932-942.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Kimura, K., J.-I. Wachino, H. Kurokawa, S. Suzuki, K. Yamane, N. Shibata, and Y. Arakawa. 2006. Emergence of penicillin-resistant group B streptococci, abstr. C2-1286. Abstr. 46th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
  18. 18.↵
    Lu, J.-J., C.-L. Perng, S.-Y. Lee, and C.-C. Wan. 2000. Use of PCR with universal primers and restriction endonuclease digestions for detection and identification of common bacterial pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid. J. Clin. Microbiol.38:2076-2080.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Morikawa, Y., M. Kitazato, C. Katsukawa, and A. Tamaru. 2003. Prevalence of cefotaxime resistance in group B streptococcus isolates from Osaka, Japan. J. Infect. Chemother.9:131-133.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Schrag, S. J., S. Zywicki, M. M. Farley, A. L. Reingold, L. H. Harrison, L. B. Lefkowitz, J. L. Hadler, R. Danila, P. R. Cieslak, and A. Schuchat. 2000. Group B streptococcal disease in the era of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. N. Engl. J. Med.342:15-20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    Schuchat, A. 1998. Epidemiology of group B streptococcal disease in the United States: shifting paradigms. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.11:497-513.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    Schuchat, A. 1999. Group B streptococcus. Lancet353:51-56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Stoll, B. J., N. Hansen, A. A. Fanaroff, L. L. Wright, W. A. Carlo, R. A. Ehrenkranz, J. A. Lemons, E. F. Donovan, A. R. Stark, J. E. Tyson, W. Oh, C. R. Bauer, S. B. Korones, S. Shankaran, A. R. Laptook, D. K. Stevenson, L. A. Papile, and W. K. Poole. 2002. Changes in pathogens causing early-onset sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants. N. Engl. J. Med.347:240-247.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    Van Asselt, G. J., G. de Kort, and J. A. M. van de Klundert. 1995. Differences in penicillin-binding protein patterns of penicillin tolerant and non-tolerant group A streptococci. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.35:67-74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
First Molecular Characterization of Group B Streptococci with Reduced Penicillin Susceptibility
Kouji Kimura, Satowa Suzuki, Jun-ichi Wachino, Hiroshi Kurokawa, Kunikazu Yamane, Naohiro Shibata, Noriyuki Nagano, Haru Kato, Keigo Shibayama, Yoshichika Arakawa
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jul 2008, 52 (8) 2890-2897; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00185-08

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
First Molecular Characterization of Group B Streptococci with Reduced Penicillin Susceptibility
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
First Molecular Characterization of Group B Streptococci with Reduced Penicillin Susceptibility
Kouji Kimura, Satowa Suzuki, Jun-ichi Wachino, Hiroshi Kurokawa, Kunikazu Yamane, Naohiro Shibata, Noriyuki Nagano, Haru Kato, Keigo Shibayama, Yoshichika Arakawa
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jul 2008, 52 (8) 2890-2897; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00185-08
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacterial Proteins
penicillin-binding proteins
penicillins
Streptococcus agalactiae

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596