Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mechanisms of Resistance

Characterization of tet(32) Genes from the Oral Metagenome

Philip Warburton, Adam P. Roberts, Elaine Allan, Lorna Seville, Holli Lancaster, Peter Mullany
Philip Warburton
Division of Microbial Diseases, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, 256 Gray's Inn Road, University College London, London WC1X 8LD, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adam P. Roberts
Division of Microbial Diseases, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, 256 Gray's Inn Road, University College London, London WC1X 8LD, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elaine Allan
Division of Microbial Diseases, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, 256 Gray's Inn Road, University College London, London WC1X 8LD, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lorna Seville
Division of Microbial Diseases, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, 256 Gray's Inn Road, University College London, London WC1X 8LD, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Holli Lancaster
Division of Microbial Diseases, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, 256 Gray's Inn Road, University College London, London WC1X 8LD, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Mullany
Division of Microbial Diseases, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, 256 Gray's Inn Road, University College London, London WC1X 8LD, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: p.mullany@eastman.ucl.ac.uk
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00788-08
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

tet(32) was identified in three bacterial isolates and in metagenomic DNA from the human oral cavity. The regions immediately flanking the gene were found to have similarities to the mobile elements TnB1230 from Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens, ATE-3 from Arcanobacterium pyogenes, and CTn5 from Clostridium difficile.

Tetracycline resistance in the oral cavity is primarily mediated through the acquisition of genes encoding ribosomal protection proteins (RPPs) (5, 10, 13), which are often associated with mobile elements (9).

The RPP gene tet(32) was initially reported in the Clostridium-related human colonic anaerobe K10 (4) but was subsequently reported to be a mosaic, tet(O/32/0) (12). Recently, the proposed nonmosaic sequence of tet(32) has been reported (6). In this study we characterize two variants of tet(32) and their immediate flanking regions.

The strains and plasmids used in this study are shown in Table 1. Streptococcus salivarius FStet12 was isolated from a Finnish volunteer as part of a European study investigating antibiotic resistance in oral bacteria (ARTRADI; http://www.microfun.u-psud.fr/microfun/ ) and is the same isolate investigated by Patterson et al. (6). A tet(32) gene was cloned into pCC1BAC (Epicentre, Madison, WI) from metagenomic DNA isolated from saliva from healthy English volunteers (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and transposons used in this studya

The sequences of tet(32) and its flanking regions were obtained using single-specific-primer PCR and a primer-walking strategy (Table 2). Analysis of the predicted amino acid sequences revealed two variants of Tet(32). The first, carried by 41.2T.2 and FStet12, shares 98% amino acid identity with the second variant carried by both 41.1T and ES2-K21. Interestingly, 41.1T and 41.2T.2A were isolated from the same subject (3), indicating that variants of Tet(32) can coexist. Tet(32) shows 69% amino acid identity with its closest relatives, Tet(M) in Tn916 and Tet(O) from Streptococcus pneumoniae (Fig. 1).

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Phylogenetic relationship between tet(32) and the other tetracycline-resistant RPPs. The Bacillus subtilis Fus protein for translation elongation factor EF-G was used as the outgroup. The protein names and their origins and GenBank accession numbers are as follows: Streptococcus salivarius FStet12, Tet(32), DQ647324; Bacteroides sp. strain 139, Tet(36), AJ514254; Clostridium acetobutylicum, TetB (P), AAK78830; Enterococcus faecalis Tn916, Tet(M), U09422; Streptococcus pneumoniae, Tet(O), P72533; Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, Tet(Q), X58717; Listeria monocytogenes BM4210 pIP811, Tet(S), Q48791; Streptococcus pyogenes A498, Tet(T), L42544; Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens, Tet(W), AJ222769; Streptomyces coelicolor A3, Tet, CAC14348; Streptomyces rimosus, OtrA, CAA37477; Bacillus subtilis, Fus, P80868.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Oligonucleotides used in the sequencing of tet(32) and its flanking regions

Genomic DNA from the three isolates, together with the DNA of pPJW1, was used as template in a PCR using the degenerate RPP primers RPP-F and RPP-R (see Fig. 2 for the primer binding sites). Sequence analysis of the PCR products showed that only tet(32) was amplified, indicating the absence of other RPP genes.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Organization of the regions flanking tet(32) in 41.1T, ES2-K21, FStet12, and 41.2T.2 and similar regions from TnB1230 and ATE-3. ORFs are represented by arrows, with those conserved between species represented in the same shading. The dotted line indicates a region not present in FStet12/41.2T.2.

The presence of both variants of tet(32) in metagenomic DNA from Finland, Norway, and Scotland was demonstrated (data not shown) by PCR with specific primers, Tet(32) 21-F and Tet(32) 1898-R (Table 2). In addition, the input DNA used to make the clone ES2-K21 plus strains 41.1T and 41.2T.2 was derived from saliva taken from volunteers from England, demonstrating that tet(32) is present in different geographical locations within Europe.

Analysis of the flanking regions revealed that those from 41.2T.2 and FStet12 are identical, suggesting that tet(32) may be contained on a region of mobile DNA. The flanking regions in 41.1T and ES2-K21 shared 99% nucleotide homology over the majority of sequence, diverging at 1,164 bp upstream of tet(32) (Fig. 2). The region immediately flanking tet(32) is conserved in all four strains, suggesting a possible core structure surrounding the gene; a similar observation was reported for tet(W) (2).

The region immediately upstream of tet(32) shares 95% nucleotide identity with the region upstream of tet(W) in TnB1230 and ATE-3 (AJ222769 and DQ519395, respectively). The novel open reading frame (ORF) orf23, identified upstream of tet(32), is truncated upstream of tet(W) due to base pair substitutions resulting in an early stop codon.

Orf173, identified upstream of Orf23 in 41.1T and ES2-K21, shows 50% amino acid identity to a phosphotransferase (YP_001512320) reported to encode aminonucleoside antibiotic resistance, although strains 41.1T and ES2-K21 are not resistant to puromycin (data not shown). orf173 was not present in 41.2T.2 or FStet12 as a result of a deletion (dotted line, Fig. 2); however, the 200-bp region upstream was homologous to the sequences upstream of orf173 in 41.1T and ES2-K21.

Upstream of orf173, the sequences of 41.1T and ES2-K21 diverge, but two putative ORFs are identified in each sequence. In ES2-K21 one shared 97% amino acid identity with MafF (CAJ43240) from TnB1230, while Orf153 was not homologous to anything in the database. The two ORFs in 41.1T, Orf46 and Orf103, share conserved gene order with ORFs within the conjugal transfer region of CTn5 from Clostridium difficile 630 (11) and show homology with a putative conjugative transposon membrane protein (CAJ68724) and a single-stranded DNA binding protein (CAJ68723), respectively.

A single ORF was identified downstream of tet(32) with a predicted TTG start codon and an appropriately spaced Shine-Dalgarno sequence. In ES2-K21 and 41.1T, Orf151 has 96% amino acid identity to a hypothetical DNA binding protein from Bacteroides capillosus (ZP_02036259) and 83% identity to a helix-turn-helix domain protein from the ATE-3 element of Arcanobacterium pyogenes (ABF72130) (checked box in Fig. 2), although Orf151 has 102 amino acids more than Orf49. However, in 41.2T.2 and FStet12, a −1 frameshift within this ORF, at base pair 246, results in a stop codon and is designated orf114 to reflect this change. Orf114 still contains this initial homologous region, but no significant homology was seen after the deletion.

Recently, a genome fragment of Clostridium scindens ATCC 35704 (NZ_ABFY02000002), recovered from a human fecal sample (14), was reported to contain a tet(M)-like gene. However, tet(32) from ES2-K21 is identical to this gene, and the surrounding region from mafF to orf151 inclusive shows 98% nucleotide homology to the same region in C. scindens.

All three isolates were mated with rifampin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis JH2-2 or Streptococcus pyogenes ATCC 12202 as described previously (8). An average of 3.3 × 1010 donor and 5.7 × 1010 recipient cells were screened per mating, but no transconjugants were isolated. Bacillus subtilis BS34A carrying Tn916 was mated with E. faecalis JH2-2 as a control, and transconjugants arose at a frequency of 1 × 10−9 per donor. Although transfer of tet(32) could not be demonstrated, the presence of identical genes and flanking regions in Streptococcus and Eubacterium species suggests that transfer may have occurred between them or via one or more intermediates. The homology of these flanking regions to other conjugative transposons suggests that the resistance gene may be located on a mobile element. More work is required to understand how this gene is disseminated in bacterial populations.

In summary, we have characterized two variants of tet(32) from the oral cavity. Although transfer could not be demonstrated, the DNA flanking tet(32) revealed similarities to proven and putative conjugative transposons, in particular ATE-3, TnB1230 and CTn5.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The sequences of tet(32) and flanking regions from the following strains were deposited in GenBank: 41.1T (EF626941), 41.2T.2 (EF626942), FStet12 (EF626943), and ES2-K21 (EU722333).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study has been carried out with financial support from the Wellcome Trust, Commission of the European Communities, specifically the RTD program “Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources,” QLK2-CT-2002-00843, “Antimicrobial resistance transfer from and between Gram positive bacteria of the digestive tract and consequences for virulence,” and the Wolfson Trust.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 16 June 2008.
    • Returned for modification 20 August 2008.
    • Accepted 20 October 2008.
  • Copyright © 2009 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Jacob, A. E., and S. J. Hobbs. 1974. Conjugal transfer of plasmid-borne multiple antibiotic resistance in Streptococcus faecalis var. zymogenes. J. Bacteriol.117:360-372.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Kazimierczak, K. A., H. J. Flint, and K. P. Scott. 2006. Comparative analysis of sequences flanking tet(W) resistance genes in multiple species of gut bacteria. Antimcrob. Agents Chemother.50:2632-2639.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Lancaster, H., R. Bedi, M. Wilson, and P. Mullany. 2005. The maintenance in the oral cavity of children of tetracycline-resistant bacteria and the genes encoding such resistance. J. Antimcrob. Chemother.56:524-531.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Melville, C. M., P. S. Scott, D. K. Mercer, and H. J. Flint. 2001. Novel tetracycline resistance gene, tet(32), in the Clostridium-related human colonic anaerobe K10 and its transmission in vitro to the rumen anaerobe Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.45:3246-3249.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Olsvik, B., and F. C. Tenover. 1993. Tetracycline resistance in periodontal pathogens. Clin. Infect. Dis.16(Suppl. 4):S310-S313.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Patterson, A. J., M. T. Rincon, H. J. Flint, and K. P. Scott. 2007. Mosaic tetracycline resistance genes are widespread in human and animal fecal samples. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.51:1115-1118.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.
    Roberts, A. P., C. Hennequin, M. Elmore, A. Collignon, T. Karjalainen, N. Minton, and P. Mullany. 2003. Development of an integrative vector for the expression of antisense RNA in Clostridium difficile. J. Microbiol. Methods55:617-624.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Roberts, A. P., P. Mullany, and M. Wilson. 2001. Gene transfer in bacterial biofilms. Methods Enzymol.336:60-65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Roberts, M. C. 2003. Tetracycline therapy: update. Clin. Infect. Dis.36:462-467.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Roberts, M. C., and B. J. Moncla. 1988. Tetracycline resistance and TetM in oral anaerobic bacteria and Neisseria perflava-N. sicca. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.32:1271-1273.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Sebaihia, M., B. W. Wren, P. Mullany, N. F. Fairweather, N. Minton, R. Stabler, N. R. Thomson, A. P. Roberts, A. M. Cerdeño-Tárraga, H. Wang, M. T. G. Holden, A. Wright, C. Churcher, M. A. Quail, S. Baker, N. Bason, K. Brooks, T. Chillingworth, A. Cronin, P. Davis, L. Dowd, A. Fraser, T. Feltwell, Z. Hance, S. Holroyd, K. Jagels, S. Moule, K. Mungall, C. Price, E. Rabbinowitsch, S. Sharp, M. Simmonds, K. Stevens, L. Unwin, S. Whithead, B. Dupuy, G. Dougan, B. Barrell, and J. Parkhill. 2006. The multidrug-resistant human pathogen Clostridium difficile has a highly mobile, mosaic genome. Nat. Genet.38:779-786.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Stanton, T. B., S. B. Humphrey, K. P. Scott, and H. J. Flint. 2005. Hybrid tet genes and tet gene nomenclature: request for opinion. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.49:1265-1266.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Villedieu, A., M. L. Diaz-Torres, N. Hunt, R. McNab, D. A. Spratt, M. Wilson, and P. Mullany. 2003. Prevalence of tetracycline resistance genes in oral bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.47:878-882.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Winter, J., G. N. Morris, S. O'Rourke-Locascio, V. D. Bokkenheuser, E. H. Mosbach, B. I. Cohen, and P. B. Hylemon. 1984. Mode of action of steroid desmolase and reductase synthesized by Clostridium “scindens” (formerly Clostridium strain 19). J. Lipid. Res.25:1124-1131.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  15. 15.
    Yanisch-Perron, C., J. Vieira, and J. Messing. 1985. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strain: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene33:103-119.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Characterization of tet(32) Genes from the Oral Metagenome
Philip Warburton, Adam P. Roberts, Elaine Allan, Lorna Seville, Holli Lancaster, Peter Mullany
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Dec 2008, 53 (1) 273-276; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00788-08

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Characterization of tet(32) Genes from the Oral Metagenome
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Characterization of tet(32) Genes from the Oral Metagenome
Philip Warburton, Adam P. Roberts, Elaine Allan, Lorna Seville, Holli Lancaster, Peter Mullany
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Dec 2008, 53 (1) 273-276; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00788-08
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Mouth
Repressor Proteins

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596