Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Pharmacology

Preparation and Stability of Voriconazole Eye Drop Solution

Antoine Dupuis, Nicolas Tournier, Gwenaël Le Moal, Nicolas Venisse
Antoine Dupuis
1Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
2Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Antoine.Dupuis@univ-poitiers.fr
Nicolas Tournier
1Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gwenaël Le Moal
1Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicolas Venisse
1Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01126-08
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The combined systemic and topical administration of voriconazole has successfully been used to treat keratomycosis. Because no voriconazole eye drop product is commercially available, we prepared a sterile eye drop solution (10 mg/ml). Voriconazole remains stable over 30 days, providing an eye drop solution suitable for use for the topical treatment of fungal keratitis.

Voriconazole is a recent triazole antifungal agent that is highly effective against Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Candida species. Furthermore, voriconazole is one of the few drugs active against Scedosporium apiospermum (10). These fungi may cause severe keratomycosis, a rare but sight-threatening infection of the cornea (4).

The conventional management of keratomycosis includes the local application, with or without systemic administration, of antifungal drugs. The use of voriconazole for the treatment of visually devastating disease due to Scedosporium apiospermum has been proposed (7, 14). The treatment combines the systemic and the topical administration of voriconazole (6). More recently, voriconazole has successfully been used for the treatment of keratitis caused by a variety of fungi, most commonly, Aspergillus species, Fusarium species, and Candida species (2, 8, 9, 11).

As is the case for many antimicrobial agents, no voriconazole eye drop solution is commercially available. Although several authors have reported on the potential of voriconazole for use for topical ophthalmic administration, none of them focused on the stability or the storage of voriconazole. This paper describes how we prepared a voriconazole ophthalmic solution. In addition, we performed a study in order to assess the stability of this solution over 1 month. Finally, the sterility of the preparation was evaluated.

On the basis of information available in the literature (8, 9, 11), a 1% (10-mg/ml) voriconazole eye drop solution was prepared by using the branded product: voriconazole powder for solution for intravenous infusion (Vfend; Pfizer). Voriconazole powder (200 mg) was reconstituted with 19 ml of water for injections in order to obtain 20 ml of a 10-mg/ml voriconazole solution. Sterile filtration through a 0.20-μm-pore-size filter was then performed. Finally, the voriconazole solution was packaged in a specific sterile vial for use as an eye drop solution. In order to keep the solution sterile, reconstitution was performed according to recommendations for aseptic preparation.

In order to cure keratomycosis, antifungal eye drops must be administered over a long period (at least 6 weeks). Although the eye drop solution needs to be kept for several days after preparation for its use by a patient, its stability was unknown. Therefore, in order to assess the stability of the voriconazole eye drop solution, three batches of the formulation were stored for up to 30 days under different projected conditions suitable for its routine use. Under condition A, the solutions (n = 6) were kept at room temperature (24 ± 3°C) and were not protected from light (colorless type I glass vial). Under condition B, the solutions (n = 6) were kept at room temperature (24 ± 3°C) and were protected from light (colored type I glass vial). Under condition C, the solutions (n = 6) were kept refrigerated (4 ± 2°C) and were protected from light (colored type I glass vial).

After storage under the different appropriate conditions, the solutions were inspected visually. An osmolarity assay was performed, and the pH of the solutions was determined. Finally, the voriconazole contents of the solutions were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 7, 10, 15, and 30. A previously described HPLC assay (5) was used, with minor modifications. Briefly, separation was performed with a Kromasil C18 column (5 μm, 150 by 3 mm). The mobile phase consisted of 0.04 M aqueous phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) containing 50% (vol/vol) methanol, and the flow rate was 1 ml ·min−1. The retention time of voriconazole was equal to 7.5 min. The wavelength of the UV absorbance detector was set at 225 nm. The method was linear over a concentration range of 0 of 20 μg ·ml−1 (r2 ≥ 0.9997), and the limit of quantitation of voriconazole was equal to 1.25 μg ·ml−1. The intraday and interday coefficients of variation calculated with two concentrations were equal to or less than 5.7%. To ensure that the method can suitably indicate the stability of the solution, we checked that the decomposition products obtained from the voriconazole solution subjected to severe stress (100°C, pH 1) did not coelute with the intact drug (12).

Sterility tests were performed by the use of a closed-membrane filtration method (Steritest; Millipore). Samples were incubated for 14 days, and the results were read daily. Bacterial growth was determined by visual examination. A test for sterility was performed on days 0 and 30, and the requirements for sterility were met only when no growth was observed.

The mean recovery of the voriconazole content in the eye drop preparation was more than 99%, demonstrating that almost no drug was lost during preparation. The solution was clear, and no color was detected just after preparation or during storage. In addition, the sterility of the sealed preparation was preserved throughout the storage period.

Whatever storage condition was used, no significant degradation of voriconazole occurred (Fig. 1). Indeed, during the period of testing, the proportion of the initial voriconazole concentration remaining was >90%, the limit set by the U.S. Pharmacopeia (13). Voriconazole was stable under regular storage temperatures (+4°C and room temperature). Furthermore, exposure to light did not cause the degradation of voriconazole.

During storage, the pH of the voriconazole solution remained stable (7.0 ± 0.1), and no significant variation in the osmolarity occurred (562 ± 10 mosmol/liter). These results indicate that the voriconazole in the solution is chemically stable for at least 30 days, and the amount of intact drug remaining suggests that the microbiological activity of the solution is preserved.

The parenteral formulation of the commercial product (Vfend) contains a new excipient, sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin sodium (SBEβCD), that enhances the solubility of voriconazole. Cyclodextrin facilitates the formulation of the eye drop solution and improves its clinical properties (1). SBEβCD has already been used for ocular drug delivery, with success, at final concentrations ranging from 5 to 15% (1). The SBEβCD concentration in our eye drop solution was equal to 160 mg/ml, leading to a hyperosmolar ophthalmic solution compared to the physiological osmolarity of tears. Nevertheless, several anti-infectious eye drop preparations commonly used to treat infectious keratitis have similarly high osmolarities (3) but do not cause significant side effects. Therefore, the osmolarity of our preparation was considered to be safe and compatible with ocular administration. Finally, the voriconazole preparation provided a neutral pH solution close to the physiological pH of tears (about 7.4); because tears have a wide buffering capacity, no pH adjustment was made.

The recent increasing use of topical voriconazole by patients with severe keratomycosis raises the issue of eye drop stability and storage. Several authors recommend that topical voriconazole solution be kept refrigerated for no longer than 48 h, as recommended by the manufacturer (2, 9). These storage conditions are highly constraining, in particular, for outpatient treatment. Therefore, according to the findings of this work, the stability of the voriconazole eye drop solution prepared under our conditions could be extended to up to 30 days.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Stability of voriconazole eye drop solution under the three storage conditions, conditions A to C, as described in the text. All values are the means of six independent determinations ± standard deviations (symbols without bars correspond to values for which the standard deviation is smaller than the symbol size).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Regis Lubat for helpful discussions.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 22 August 2008.
    • Returned for modification 10 September 2008.
    • Accepted 29 October 2008.
  • Copyright © 2009 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Bourlais, C. L., L. Acar, H. Zia, P. A. Sado, T. Needham, and R. Leverge. 1998. Ophthalmic drug delivery systems—recent advances. Prog. Retin. Eye Res.17:33-58.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    Bunya, V. Y., K. M. Hammersmith, C. J. Rapuano, B. D. Ayres, and E. J. Cohen. 2007. Topical and oral voriconazole in the treatment of fungal keratitis. Am. J. Ophthalmol.143:151-153.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Chédru-Legros, V., M. Fines-Guyon, A. Chérel, A. Perdriel, F. Albessard, D. Debruyne, and F. Mouriaux. 2007. Fortified antibiotic (vancomycin, amikacin and ceftazidime) eye drop stability assessment at −20 degrees C. J. Fr. Ophtalmol.30:807-813.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Díaz-Valle, D., J. M. Benitez del Castillo, E. Amor, N. Toledano, M. M. Carretero, and T. Díaz-Valle. 2002. Severe keratomycosis secondary to Scedosporium apiospermum. Cornea21:516-518.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Gage, R., and D. A. Stopher. 1998. A rapid HPLC assay for voriconazole in human plasma. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.17:1449-1453.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Hernández Prats, C., F. Llinares Tello, A. Burgos San José, J. Selva Otaolaurruchi, and J. P. Ordovás Baines. 2004. Voriconazole in fungal keratitis caused by Scedosporium apiospermum. Ann. Pharmacother.38:414-417.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Lai, T. F., R. Malhotra, R. Esmail-Zaden, A. Galanopoulas, M. Chehade, and D. Selva. 2003. Use of voriconazole in Scedosporium apiospermum keratitis. Cornea22:391-392.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Lau, D., M. Fedinands, L. Leung, R. Fullinfaw, D. Kong, G. Davies, and M. Daniell. 2008. Penetration of voriconazole, 1%, eyedrops into human aqueous humor: a prospective open-label study. Arch. Ophthalmol.126:343-346.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Mehta, H., H. B. Mehta, P. Garg, and H. Kodial. 2008. Voriconazole for the treatment of refractory Aspergillus fumigatus keratitis. Indian J. Ophthalmol.56:238-240.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    Scott, L. J., and D. Simpson. 2007. Voriconazole: a review of its use in the management of invasive fungal infections. Drugs67:269-298.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Thiel, M. A., A. S. Zinkernagel, J. Burhenne, C. Kaufmann, and W. E. Haefeli. 2007. Voriconazole concentration in human aqueous humor and plasma during topical or combined topical and systemic administration for fungal keratitis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.51:239-244.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Trissel, L. A. 1983. Avoiding common flaws in stability and compatibility studies of injectable drugs. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm.40:1159-1160.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention. 1995. Pharmacopeia of the United States of America (the national formulary). U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention, Rockville, MD.
  14. 14.↵
    Wu, Z., H. Ying, S. Yiu, J. Irvine, and R. Smith. 2002. Fungal keratitis caused by Scedosporium apiospermum: report of two cases and review of treatment. Cornea21:519-523.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Preparation and Stability of Voriconazole Eye Drop Solution
Antoine Dupuis, Nicolas Tournier, Gwenaël Le Moal, Nicolas Venisse
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jan 2009, 53 (2) 798-799; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01126-08

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Preparation and Stability of Voriconazole Eye Drop Solution
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Preparation and Stability of Voriconazole Eye Drop Solution
Antoine Dupuis, Nicolas Tournier, Gwenaël Le Moal, Nicolas Venisse
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jan 2009, 53 (2) 798-799; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01126-08
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

antifungal agents
Pyrimidines
triazoles

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596