Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Experimental Therapeutics

Inhaled Voriconazole for Prevention of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis

Justin A. Tolman, Nathan P. Wiederhold, Jason T. McConville, Laura K. Najvar, Rosie Bocanegra, Jay I. Peters, Jacqueline J. Coalson, John R. Graybill, Thomas F. Patterson, Robert O. Williams III
Justin A. Tolman
1The University of Texas at Austin College of Pharmacy, Austin, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathan P. Wiederhold
1The University of Texas at Austin College of Pharmacy, Austin, Texas
2The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Pharmacotherapy Education and Research Center, San Antonio, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: wiederholdn@uthscsa.edu williro@mail.utexas.edu
Jason T. McConville
1The University of Texas at Austin College of Pharmacy, Austin, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura K. Najvar
3The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, San Antonio, Texas
4South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rosie Bocanegra
3The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, San Antonio, Texas
4South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jay I. Peters
4South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas
5The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Diseases/Critical Care Medicine, San Antonio, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacqueline J. Coalson
6The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Department of Pathology, San Antonio, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John R. Graybill
3The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, San Antonio, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas F. Patterson
3The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, San Antonio, Texas
4South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert O. Williams III
1The University of Texas at Austin College of Pharmacy, Austin, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: wiederholdn@uthscsa.edu williro@mail.utexas.edu
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01657-08
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Targeted airway delivery of antifungals as prophylaxis against invasive aspergillosis may lead to high lung drug concentrations while avoiding toxicities associated with systemically administered agents. We evaluated the effectiveness of aerosolizing the intravenous formulation of voriconazole as prophylaxis against invasive pulmonary aspergillosis caused by Aspergillus fumigatus in an established murine model. Inhaled voriconazole significantly improved survival and limited the extent of invasive disease, as assessed by histopathology, compared to control and amphotericin B treatments.

Invasive aspergillosis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in heavily immunocompromised patients and is associated with significant hospital costs and therapy complications in those with multiple comorbidities (3, 5, 9). Targeted pulmonary delivery by aerosolization of antifungals has recently gained attention, as this strategy may lead to high local concentrations at the primary site of infection (1, 4, 6). Our objective was to assess an inhaled aqueous solution of voriconazole as prophylaxis against invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. We hypothesized that this strategy would prevent invasive disease and improve survival in an established murine model.

This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, and all animals were handled in accordance with the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care. Outbred ICR mice (Harlan) were immunosuppressed by cyclophosphamide and cortisone acetate and inoculated via an aerosol chamber with Aspergillus fumigatus clinical isolate Af293 as previously described (7, 8). Mice were assigned to the following groups: (i) inhaled voriconazole (5 ml of a 6.25-mg/ml formulation of commercially available voriconazole IV containing 100 mg/ml sulfobutyl ether-β-cyclodextrin sodium via 20 min of aerosolization twice daily; Pfizer, Inc.) or aerosolized sulfobutyl ether-β-cyclodextrin sodium as a control (5 ml of a 100-mg/ml solution via 20 min of aerosolization twice daily; Captisol, CyDex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) as prophylaxis begun 2 days prior to pulmonary inoculation or (ii) amphotericin B deoxycholate treatment (1 mg/kg intraperitoneally daily) begun 1 day after inoculation. Voriconazole and control mice received aerosolized solutions in a nose-only dosing chamber by an Aeroneb Pro micropump nebulizer system. All agents were continued until day 7 postinoculation. Mice were then monitored off therapy until day 12. Animals that appeared moribund were euthanized, and death was recorded as occurring the next day.

For fungal burden analysis, 12 mice from each group were euthanized on day 8 and the lung tissue was harvested. Lungs were homogenized in sterile saline, and serial dilutions were plated onto potato dextrose agar. Following 24 h of incubation at 37°C, colonies were enumerated and numbers of CFU per gram of lung tissue were calculated. Pulmonary fungal burdens were also quantified by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) as previously described (2). DNA was extracted from 90 μl of lung homogenate with a commercially available kit (DNeasy Tissue Kit; Qiagen), and fungal DNA was measured by qPCR with a probe and primers specific for the A. fumigatus FKS gene (GenBank accession no. U79728) and reported as the number of conidial equivalents (CE) per gram of tissue (11). Two additional mice per group were selected and euthanized on days 8 and 12 for histopathology. Lungs were placed into 10% (vol/vol) formaldehyde, processed, and embedded in paraffin wax, and coronal sections were obtained. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and viewed by light microscopy. Survival was plotted by Kaplan-Meier analysis, with differences in median and percent survival analyzed by the log rank and chi-square tests, respectively. Differences in fungal burden (numbers of CFU and CE per gram) were assessed by analysis of variance with Tukey's posttest for multiple comparisons. A P value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Mice that received aerosolized voriconazole had a survival advantage over controls and those treated with amphotericin B, with survival on therapy significantly improved in the aerosolized voriconazole prophylaxis group (92%) compared to that of controls (25%; P < 0.05) and those treated with amphotericin B (31%; P < 0.05) (Fig. 1). This survival benefit was maintained once therapy was discontinued, with 67% of the animals that received voriconazole surviving until day 12, compared to 17% of the controls (P < 0.05) and 23% of those treated with amphotericin B (P < 0.05). No survival difference was observed between the control and amphotericin B groups. The median survival time of mice that received aerosolized voriconazole (>12 days) was also significantly longer than that of mice that received the control or amphotericin B, 7.5 and 7 days, respectively (P < 0.01). Although survival in the amphotericin B treatment group was poor, the survival at day 4 is consistent with previously reported data after 4 days of treatment with the same dose (12). Furthermore, survival rates have only reached 50% when the dose of amphotericin B deoxycholate has been increased to 3 mg/kg/day or when high-dose liposomal amphotericin B (10 mg/kg/day) has been used in this animal model (11). These results demonstrate the difficulty in achieving favorable treatment outcomes in heavily immunocompromised hosts once disease is established.

Although survival was improved in animals that received aerosolized voriconazole, this benefit was not explained by reductions in tissue burden. As shown in Table 1, no significant differences in median tissue burden, as measured by CFU count or qPCR, were observed between any of the groups (Table 1). However, marked differences in lung histopathology were found (Fig. 2). Animals that received the control or amphotericin B had more severe invasive disease and marked abnormalities within the lungs compared to those administered aerosolized voriconazole. Specifically, lungs from control and amphotericin B-treated animals had increased epithelial disruption, congestion, necrosis, angioinvasion, and vascular lesions within the small airways on day 8. The extent of pulmonary lesions was variable in mice that received amphotericin B, indicating inconsistent in vivo activity (Fig. 3). In contrast, mice that received aerosolized voriconazole had fewer signs of invasive disease and markedly improved histological findings. Similar findings were also noted on day 12 postinoculation, supporting the finding that the protective effects of aerosolized voriconazole are maintained once prophylaxis is stopped. Thus, the improved survival may be attributed to reductions in the extent of invasive disease following aerosolized voriconazole. Furthermore, both aerosolized voriconazole and sulfobutyl ether-β-cyclodextrin sodium are well tolerated, with no lung injury or inflammatory changes on histology in uninfected mice (data not shown).

Our results suggest that aerosolized voriconazole may be effective for targeted delivery to the lungs. This is encouraging, as we adapted the commercially available intravenous formulation with adjustments to ensure that the osmolality (293.2 mosM/kg) and pH (6.4 to 6.8) were within physiologically acceptable ranges for pulmonary delivery (10). Furthermore, peak lung voriconazole concentrations of 6.73 μg/g have been achieved in uninfected mice following multiple inhaled doses, with lower peak values observed in serum (2.32 μg/ml) (10). Although these results are promising, additional studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy of inhaled voriconazole as prophylaxis and treatment to further support its therapeutic use.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Survival curves of immunosuppressed mice that received aerosolized voriconazole (VRC; 6.25 mg/ml twice daily), amphotericin B deoxycholate (AMB), or a control (aerosolized sulfobutyl ether-β-cyclodextrin sodium, 100 mg/ml twice daily) and were challenged by pulmonary inoculation with A. fumigatus. (A) Survival on therapy (day 7; n = 24 per study group). (B) Survival after therapy was discontinued (n = 12 per study group).

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Representative histopathology, on days 8 and 12 postinoculation, of lungs from mice that received a control (aerosolized sulfobutyl ether-β-cyclodextrin sodium), intraperitoneal amphotericin B deoxycholate, or aerosolized voriconazole. Lung sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and viewed by light microscopy at ×20 magnification.

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Box plots of the numbers of necrotic foci observed by histopathology in lungs per animal (A) and per lung field (B) in mice that received a control (aerosolized sulfobutyl ether-β-cyclodextrin sodium), prophylaxis with aerosolized voriconazole (VRC), or treatment with intraperitoneal amphotericin B deoxycholate (AMB). Boxes represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, and horizontal lines within the boxes represent the median values.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Pulmonary fungal burdens of the mice used in this study

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We gratefully acknowledge Destiny Molina and Marcos Olivo for their assistance in the animal studies.

We thank CyDex Pharmaceuticals Inc. for their financial support.

N.P.W. has received research support from CyDex Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, and Schering-Plough. J.I.P. has served on the speaker's bureau for Merck and Boehringer-Ingelheim. J.R.G. has received research support from Pfizer, Schering-Plough, Merck, and Astellas and has served on the speaker's bureau for Merck and Schering-Plough and as a consultant for Merck, Schering-Plough, Indevus, Vicuron, Nektar, and F2G. T.F.P. has received research support from Merck, Pfizer, Schering-Plough, and Nektar Therapeutics and has served on the speaker's bureau for Merck and Pfizer and as a consultant for Astellas, Basilea, Merck, Nektar, Pfizer, Schering-Plough, and Stiefel Laboratories. R.O.W. has received research support from CyDex Pharmaceuticals. J.A.T., J.T.M., L.K.N., R.B., and J.J.C. have no disclosures to report.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 17 December 2008.
    • Returned for modification 19 January 2009.
    • Accepted 6 March 2009.
  • Copyright © 2009 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Alexander, B. D., E. S. Dodds Ashley, R. M. Addison, J. A. Alspaugh, N. J. Chao, and J. R. Perfect. 2006. Non-comparative evaluation of the safety of aerosolized amphotericin B lipid complex in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Transpl. Infect. Dis.8:13-20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    Bowman, J. C., G. K. Abruzzo, J. W. Anderson, A. M. Flattery, C. J. Gill, V. B. Pikounis, D. M. Schmatz, P. A. Liberator, and C. M. Douglas. 2001. Quantitative PCR assay to measure Aspergillus fumigatus burden in a murine model of disseminated aspergillosis: demonstration of efficacy of caspofungin acetate. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.45:3474-3481.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Denning, D. W. 1998. Invasive aspergillosis. Clin. Infect. Dis.26:781-805.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Dummer, J. S., N. Lazariashvilli, J. Barnes, M. Ninan, and A. P. Milstone. 2004. A survey of anti-fungal management in lung transplantation. J. Heart Lung Transplant.23:1376-1381.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Lin, S. J., J. Schranz, and S. M. Teutsch. 2001. Aspergillosis case-fatality rate: systematic review of the literature. Clin. Infect. Dis.32:358-366.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Rijnders, B. J., J. J. Cornelissen, L. Slobbe, M. J. Becker, J. K. Doorduijn, W. C. Hop, E. J. Ruijgrok, B. Lowenberg, A. Vulto, P. J. Lugtenburg, and S. de Marie. 2008. Aerosolized liposomal amphotericin B for the prevention of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis during prolonged neutropenia: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Clin. Infect. Dis.46:1401-1408.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Sheppard, D. C., J. R. Graybill, L. K. Najvar, L. Y. Chiang, T. Doedt, W. R. Kirkpatrick, R. Bocanegra, A. C. Vallor, T. F. Patterson, and S. G. Filler. 2006. Standardization of an experimental murine model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.50:3501-3503.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Sheppard, D. C., G. Rieg, L. Y. Chiang, S. G. Filler, J. E. Edwards, Jr., and A. S. Ibrahim. 2004. Novel inhalational murine model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.48:1908-1911.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Slobbe, L., S. Polinder, J. K. Doorduijn, P. J. Lugtenburg, A. el Barzouhi, E. W. Steyerberg, and B. J. Rijnders. 2008. Outcome and medical costs of patients with invasive aspergillosis and acute myelogenous leukemia-myelodysplastic syndrome treated with intensive chemotherapy: an observational study. Clin. Infect. Dis.47:1507-1512.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Tolman, J. A., N. A. Nelson, Y. J. Son, S. Bosselmann, N. P. Wiederhold, J. T. McConville, and R. O. Williams III. 2009. Characterization and pharmacokinetic analysis of aerosolized aqueous voriconazole solution. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.72:199-205.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Wiederhold, N. P., L. K. Najvar, A. C. Vallor, W. R. Kirkpatrick, R. Bocanegra, D. Molina, M. Olivo, J. R. Graybill, and T. F. Patterson. 2008. Assessment of serum (1→3)-β-d-glucan concentration as a measure of disease burden in a murine model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.52:1176-1178.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Wiederhold, N. P., V. H. Tam, J. Chi, R. A. Prince, D. P. Kontoyiannis, and R. E. Lewis. 2006. Pharmacodynamic activity of amphotericin B deoxycholate is associated with peak plasma concentrations in a neutropenic murine model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.50:469-473.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Inhaled Voriconazole for Prevention of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis
Justin A. Tolman, Nathan P. Wiederhold, Jason T. McConville, Laura K. Najvar, Rosie Bocanegra, Jay I. Peters, Jacqueline J. Coalson, John R. Graybill, Thomas F. Patterson, Robert O. Williams III
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy May 2009, 53 (6) 2613-2615; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01657-08

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inhaled Voriconazole for Prevention of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Inhaled Voriconazole for Prevention of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis
Justin A. Tolman, Nathan P. Wiederhold, Jason T. McConville, Laura K. Najvar, Rosie Bocanegra, Jay I. Peters, Jacqueline J. Coalson, John R. Graybill, Thomas F. Patterson, Robert O. Williams III
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy May 2009, 53 (6) 2613-2615; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01657-08
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

antifungal agents
invasive pulmonary aspergillosis
Pyrimidines
triazoles

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596