Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Clinical Therapeutics

Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Tafenoquine versus Mefloquine for Malaria Prophylaxis in Nonimmune Subjects

Peter E. Nasveld, Michael D. Edstein, Mark Reid, Leonard Brennan, Ivor E. Harris, Scott J. Kitchener, Peter A. Leggat, Philip Pickford, Caron Kerr, Colin Ohrt, William Prescott
and and the Tafenoquine Study Team
Peter E. Nasveld
Australian Army Malaria Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaCentre for Military and Veterans' Health, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: P.Nasveld@uq.edu.au
Michael D. Edstein
Australian Army Malaria Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Reid
Australian Army Malaria Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leonard Brennan
Australian Army Malaria Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaCentre for Military and Veterans' Health, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ivor E. Harris
Australian Army Malaria Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott J. Kitchener
Australian Army Malaria Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaCentre for Military and Veterans' Health, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter A. Leggat
Australian Army Malaria Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip Pickford
GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development Limited, Harlow, Essex, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caron Kerr
GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development Limited, Harlow, Essex, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Colin Ohrt
Division of Experimental Therapeutics, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William Prescott
U.S. Army Medical Materiel Development Activity, Frederick, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00354-09
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Drug administration and safety analysis schedule for tafenoquine and mefloquine. metHb, methemoglobin.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    Flow diagram of subject accountability during the study.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1.

    Baseline demographic characteristics and previous malarial histories of subjects on tafenoquine and mefloquine for malaria prophylaxis

    CharacteristicValue for subjects who received:
    Tafenoquine (n = 492)Mefloquine (n = 162)
    No. (%) of subjects
        Gender
            Male478 (97.2)154 (95.1)
            Female14 (2.8)8 (4.9)
        Age (yr)
            18-25286 (58.1)97 (59.9)
            26-35178 (36.2)48 (29.6)
            36-4527 (5.5)16 (9.9)
            46-551 (0.2)1 (0.6)
        Race
            White484 (98.4)160 (98.8)
            Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander4 (0.8)1 (0.6)
            Other4 (0.8)1 (0.6)
        Previous history of malaria15 (3.0)4 (2.5)
        Having malaria attacks in 6 mo prior to deployment9 (1.8)1 (0.6)
    Age
        Mean (SD)25.4 (5.3)26.0 (6.5)
        Range18-4718-51
    Weight (kg)
        Mean (SD)80.9 (11.9)81.3 (12.2)
        Range50-13553-135
    Height (cm)
        Mean (SD)177.8 (7.0)177.1 (6.7)
        Range155-198157-192
  • TABLE 2.

    Ophthalmic assessments of a subgroup of subjects on tafenoquine or mefloquine

    ActivityScreeningPosttreatment assessment
    Visual field testsAmsler gridAmsler grid
    Humphrey perimetry
    Visual acuitySnellen chartSnellen chart
    Color visionIshihara testIshihara test
    Standard pseudoisochromatic plates part 2
    Farnsworth-Munsell 100 hue test
    Physical examinationFundoscopyFundoscopy
    Corneal examinationCorneal examination
    Digital retinal photography
    Digital corneal photography
    Fundus fluorescein angiograma
    • ↵a Small number of subjects with possible retinal findings only.

  • TABLE 3.

    Adverse events occurring in >5% of subjects on tafenoquine or mefloquine (prophylactic phase)a

    Adverse eventNo. (%) of subjects by AE severity and treatment group
    MildModerateSevereTotal
    TafenoquineMefloquineTafenoquineMefloquineTafenoquineMefloquineTafenoquineMefloquine
    At least one AE431 (88)140 (86)194 (39)46 (28)18 (4)3 (2)454 (92)143 (88)
    Gastrointestinal
        Gastroenteritis109 (22)36 (22)80 (16)17 (11)6 (1)0182 (37)51 (32)
        Diarrhea77 (16)28 (17)02 (1)1 (<1)077 (16)30 (19)
        Nausea27 (6)13 (8)1 (<1)00028 (6)13 (8)
        Abdominal pain19 (4)11 (7)5 (1)3 (2)1 (<1)024 (5)13 (8)
        Vomiting19 (4)8 (5)2 (<1)1 (<1)0021 (4)8 (5)
    Musculoskeletal
        Injury149 (30)46 (28)45 (9)4 (3)3 (<1)2 (1)178 (36)49 (30)
        Back pain65 (13)24 (15)12 (2)2 (1)0074 (15)26 (16)
        Arthralgia52 (11)17 (11)9 (2)1 (<1)0055 (11)18 (11)
    Respiratory
        URTI97 (20)30 (19)6 (1)2 (1)00101 (21)32 (20)
        Pharyngitis24 (5)2 (1)2 (<1)1 (<1)0025 (5)3 (2)
    Dermatological
        Rash70 (14)20 (12)1 (<1)1 (<1)0070 (14)21 (13)
        Fungal dermatitis43 (9)8 (5)1 (<1)00044 (9)8 (5)
    Headache (constitutional AE)59 (12)18 (11)2 (<1)2 (1)0061 (12)20 (12)
    Viral infection23 (5)7 (4)16 (3)6 (4)1 (<1)039 (8)13 (8)
    • ↵a In total, there were 492 tafenoquine subjects and 162 mefloquine subjects. AE, adverse event; URTI, upper respiratory tract infection.

  • TABLE 4.

    Neuropsychiatric events in subjects on tafeoquine or mefloquine (prophylactic phase)a

    Adverse eventNo. (%) of subjects by AE severity and treatment group
    MildModerateTotal
    TafenoquineMefloquineTafenoquineMefloquineTafenoquineMefloquine
    Vertigo22 (5)7 (4)01 (<1)22 (5)8 (5)
    Somnolence12 (2)6 (4)0012 (2)6 (4)
    Abnormal dreams7 (1)2 (1)007 (1)2 (1)
    Dizziness5 (1)2 (1)005 (1)2 (1)
    Insomnia4 (<1)3 (2)1 (<1)05 (1)3 (2)
    Abnormal coordination2 (<1)1 (<1)002 (<1)1 (<1)
    Anxiety2 (<1)0002 (<1)0
    Agitation2 (<1)0002 (<1)0
    Euphoria2 (<1)0002 (<1)0
    Tremor2 (<1)0002 (<1)0
    Depression001 (<1)1 (<1)1 (<1)1 (<1)
    Paroniria1 (<1)0001 (<1)0
    Amnesia1 (<1)0001 (<1)0
    • ↵a In total, there were 492 tafenoquine subjects and 162 mefloquine subjects. There were no severe adverse events (AEs) of this type.

  • TABLE 5.

    Table of adverse events attributed as related to study drug during prophylactic phase in the safety populationa

    Adverse eventNo. (%) of patients in treatment group
    Tafenoquine (n = 492)Mefloquine (n = 162)
    At least one AE66 (13.4)19 (11.7)
    Nausea14 (2.8)4 (2.5)
    Vertigo10 (2.0)2 (1.2)
    Diarrhea9 (1.8)3 (1.9)
    Abdominal pain7 (1.4)2 (1.2)
    Abnormal dreaming6 (1.2)1 (0.6)
    Somnolence6 (1.2)1 (0.6)
    Headache3 (0.6)2 (1.2)
    Insomnia3 (0.6)2 (1.2)
    • ↵a Events occurring in >1% of subjects are shown. AE, adverse event.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Tafenoquine versus Mefloquine for Malaria Prophylaxis in Nonimmune Subjects
Peter E. Nasveld, Michael D. Edstein, Mark Reid, Leonard Brennan, Ivor E. Harris, Scott J. Kitchener, Peter A. Leggat, Philip Pickford, Caron Kerr, Colin Ohrt, William Prescott and the Tafenoquine Study Team
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jan 2010, 54 (2) 792-798; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00354-09

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Tafenoquine versus Mefloquine for Malaria Prophylaxis in Nonimmune Subjects
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
Share
Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Tafenoquine versus Mefloquine for Malaria Prophylaxis in Nonimmune Subjects
Peter E. Nasveld, Michael D. Edstein, Mark Reid, Leonard Brennan, Ivor E. Harris, Scott J. Kitchener, Peter A. Leggat, Philip Pickford, Caron Kerr, Colin Ohrt, William Prescott and the Tafenoquine Study Team
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jan 2010, 54 (2) 792-798; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00354-09
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596