Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mechanisms of Resistance

Identification of a Plasmid-Borne Resistance Gene Cluster Comprising the Resistance Genes erm(T), dfrK, and tet(L) in a Porcine Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 Strain

Kristina Kadlec, Stefan Schwarz
Kristina Kadlec
Institute of Farm Animal Genetics, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (FLI), Höltystr. 10, 31535 Neustadt-Mariensee, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan Schwarz
Institute of Farm Animal Genetics, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (FLI), Höltystr. 10, 31535 Neustadt-Mariensee, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: stefan.schwarz@fli.bund.de
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01091-09
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

A novel plasmid-borne resistance gene cluster comprising the genes erm(T) for macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance, dfrK for trimethoprim resistance, and tet(L) for tetracycline resistance was identified in a porcine methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 398 (ST398) strain. This erm(T)-dfrK-tet(L) region was flanked by copies of the novel IS element ISSau10. The erm(T) region resembled that of Streptococcus pyogenes plasmid pRW35. The erm(T) gene of pKKS25 was expressed constitutively due to a 57-bp deletion in the erm(T) translational attenuator.

In recent years, methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains of sequence type 398 (ST398) have gained particular attention as a new clonal lineage associated with livestock (7, 22, 23, 28, 30). MRSA ST398 strains have been mainly found in pigs (7, 22, 23) but are also able to colonize and cause infections in other animal species and humans (13, 21, 28, 30). Recent studies have shown that virtually all MRSA ST398 strains are resistant to β-lactam antibiotics and tetracyclines (7, 13, 21, 22, 28) but vary in their patterns of resistance to other antimicrobial agents, including macrolides, lincosamides, and/or streptogramins (MLS). Resistance to MLS antibiotics in staphylococci is mediated by a number of different resistance genes which specify either target site-modifying enzymes, efflux pumps, or drug-inactivating enzymes (16). The latest update of MLS resistance genes (http://faculty.washington.edu/marilynr ) listed the rRNA methylase genes erm(A), erm(B), erm(C), erm(F), erm(G), erm(Q), erm(Y), and erm(33) as occurring in staphylococci. Among these, erm(A), erm(B), and erm(C) have been found most frequently among staphylococci of animal origin (5, 11, 12). In MRSA ST398, macrolide-lincosamide (ML) resistance has been detected at various levels (7, 17, 21, 22, 28). In the few cases in which the genes responsible for ML resistance have been determined, the rRNA methylase genes erm(A), erm(B), and/or erm(C) have been identified (7, 10, 17, 28). In the present study, we investigated a porcine MRSA ST398 strain for the presence of the ML resistance gene, its location on a plasmid, and its association with other resistance genes.

MRSA ST398 strain 25 was obtained in 2008 from the nasal swab of a young sow in the GERM-Vet monitoring program. MIC determination by broth microdilution following the recommendations and using the clinical breakpoints given in CLSI documents M31-A3 (1) and M100-S19 (2) confirmed that this strain was resistant to β-lactam antibiotics, tetracycline, macrolides, lincosamides, and trimethoprim (Table 1). PCR analysis (9, 14, 15, 18) confirmed the presence of the genes mecA and blaZ for β-lactam resistance, the tetracycline resistance genes tet(K), tet(L), and tet(M), and the novel trimethoprim resistance gene dfrK. PCR screening for the most predominant ML resistance genes in staphylococci (11, 12) did not yield positive results. To investigate whether ML resistance was plasmid borne, plasmids were prepared and transformed into S. aureus RN4220 with subsequent selection on medium containing erythromycin (15 μg/ml) (8-10). A plasmid of ca. 40 kb, designated pKKS25, was identified and shown to confer not only combined resistance to macrolides and lincosamides but also tetracycline resistance via tet(L) and trimethoprim resistance via dfrK. Plasmid pKKS25 was subjected to restriction analysis with EcoRI, HindIII, and BglII, and the resulting fragments were cloned into the plasmid vector pBlueScript II SK+. Recombinant plasmids were transformed into macrolide-susceptible Escherichia coli strain AS19, and transformants were selected on erythromycin-containing Luria-Bertani agar (15 μg/ml).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Comparative analysis of the MICs of original pKKS25-carrying MRSA strain 25, S. aureus RN4220, and the S. aureus RN4220 transformant carrying plasmid pKKS25

A 6,229-bp segment of pKKS25 was sequenced by primer walking on both strands from overlapping clones. A schematic representation of the genes found in this segment is shown in Fig. 1. ML resistance proved to be due to the rRNA methylase gene erm(T), which has previously been found in lactobacilli (6, 19, 27), streptococci (3, 4, 20, 29), and enterococci (4) but has not yet been identified in staphylococci. The erm(T) gene coded for a 244-amino-acid (aa) protein which was indistinguishable from the chromosomal Erm(T) protein of Streptococcus pasteurianus (20) but differed by 2 aa from the plasmid-encoded Erm(T) proteins of Lactobacillus sp. (27), Lactobacillus reuteri (19), and Streptococcus pyogenes (29). A detailed analysis of the erm(T) gene region of plasmid pKKS25 revealed identity to the erm(T) region of plasmid pRW35 from S. pyogenes in a stretch of 123 bp upstream and 139 bp downstream of erm(T) (Fig. 1). Previous studies identified a complete translational attenuator immediately upstream of the erm(T) gene which consisted of two pairs of inverted-repeat sequences of 12 bp each and a reading frame for a regulatory peptide of 19 aa (19, 20, 29). This translational attenuator closely resembled the erm(C)-associated translational attenuator in staphylococci. A complete translational attenuator is required for inducible erm gene expression, while constitutive erm gene expression is often based on deletions or duplications in this regulatory region (24). Strains carrying constitutively expressed erm genes are resistant to noninducers such as lincosamides and 16-membered macrolides (24, 26). A truncated attenuator had been identified upstream of the erm(T) gene of plasmid p121BS from a tylosin-resistant Lactobacillus sp. (27). Plasmid pKKS25 was isolated from an MRSA strain that exhibited a resistance phenotype indicative of constitutive erm gene expression, namely, resistance to clindamycin and tylosin. Analysis of the pKKS25-associated translational attenuator revealed a 57-bp deletion which comprised the initial 40 bp of the reading frame for the 19-aa regulatory peptide, including the upstream part with the ribosome binding site (Fig. 2a). Based on the knowledge of structural changes in the translational attenuators of erm(C) genes, limited areas of homology are sufficient to allow recombinational events that account for deletions (26). Hence, it is most likely that the observed 57-bp deletion was also due to such a recombination (Fig. 2b). The remaining part of the resistance gene region of plasmid pKKS25, including the dfrK and tet(L) genes, corresponded closely (>99% nucleotide sequence identity) to that of plasmid pKKS2187 (9).

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Comparison of plasmid pKKS25 (accession no. FN390947), identified in the present study, with the tet(L)-dfrK segment of plasmid pKKS2187 (accession no. FM207105) and erm(T)-carrying plasmid pRW35 (accession no. EU192194). The arrows indicate the extents and directions of transcription of the genes rep, repU (plasmid replication), tet(L) (tetracycline resistance), dfrK (trimethoprim resistance), pre/mob (plasmid recombination/mobilization), and erm(T) (combined resistance to macrolides and lincosamides). The IS257 elements in the map of pKKS2187 and the ISSau10 elements in the map of pKKS25 are shown as black boxes with the white arrow indicating the transposase gene tnp. The regions with >99% homology between pKKS25 and plasmids pKKS2187 and pRW35 are marked by gray shading.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

(a) Comparison of the complete erm(T) regulatory region of pRW35 with the truncated region of pKKS25. The 57-bp deletion in pKKS25 is indicated by dashes. Vertical bars indicate bases that are identical in the two sequences. The two pairs of inverted-repeat sequences, IR1-IR2 and IR3-IR4, are marked by arrows. The reading frames for the 19-aa regulatory peptide and the 5′-terminal part of the erm(T) gene are indicated by gray shading; translational start and stop codons are underlined. Ribosomal binding sites RBS 1 and RBS 2 are displayed in boldface letters. (b) Possible site for recombination in the erm(T) translational attenuator of plasmid pKKS25 leading to the observed 57-bp deletion. The sequence determined in the pKKS25-associated translational attenuator is displayed in boldface capital letters. The lowercase letters represent the beginning and end of the deleted sequence. Important structural elements with respect to panel a, such as the ribosomal binding site RBS 1 and the IR1 sequence, are indicated. Vertical bars mark identical bases in the sequences involved in the recombinational events.

This erm(T)-dfrK-tet(L) resistance gene region was flanked by two copies of the novel insertion sequence ISSau10 oriented in the same direction (Fig. 1). This insertion sequence consisted of 793 bp and showed 87 to 88% identity to IS431 or IS257. The 224-aa transposase of ISSau10 exhibited 92 and 93% amino acid identity to the transposases of IS431 and IS257, respectively. The novel IS element carried 16-bp perfect inverted repeats (5′-GGTTCTGTTGCAAAGT-3′) at both termini. IS257 elements were shown to be involved in the integration of tet(L)-dfrK-carrying, as well as tet(K)-carrying, plasmids into larger plasmids (9, 25), and IS1216V-like elements were shown to be involved in the integration of the erm(T) gene into the chromosome of S. pasteurianus (20). It is likely that the novel ISSau10 insertion sequences played a role in the formation of the resistance gene cluster detected on plasmid pKKS25.

In conclusion, this is the first description of the gene erm(T) in staphylococci. Taking into account that tetracyclines, trimethoprim, and macrolides are among the most frequently sold antimicrobial agents in veterinary medicine worldwide, a gene cluster consisting of erm(T), dfrK, and tet(L) offers excellent options for coselection under the selective pressure imposed by the use of any of these antimicrobial agents. Moreover, the finding of erm(T) in an MRSA ST398 strain points toward the gene acquisition capacities of such strains and possible partners for gene exchange processes beyond the genus Staphylococcus.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The sequence of the resistance gene region of plasmid pKKS25 has been deposited in the EMBL database under accession number FN390947.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Kerstin Meyer and Vera Nöding for excellent technical assistance and Heike Kaspar and Ulrike Steinacker for providing MRSA strain 25.

This study was financially supported by internal funding from the Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 3 August 2009.
    • Returned for modification 13 November 2009.
    • Accepted 4 December 2009.
  • Copyright © 2010 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2008. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals; approved standard—third edition. CLSI document M31-A3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  2. 2.↵
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2009. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; nineteenth informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S19. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  3. 3.↵
    DiPersio, L. P., and J. R. DiPersio. 2007. Identification of an erm(T) gene in strains of inducibly clindamycin-resistant group B Streptococcus. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.57:189-193.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    DiPersio, L. P., J. R. DiPersio, K. C. Frey, and J. A. Beach. 2008. Prevalence of the erm(T) gene in clinical isolates of erythromycin-resistant group D Streptococcus and Enterococcus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.52:1567-1569.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Eady, E. A., J. I. Ross, J. L. Tipper, C. E. Walters, J. H. Cove, and W. C. Noble. 1993. Distribution of genes encoding erythromycin ribosomal methylases and an erythromycin efflux pump in epidemiologically distinct groups of staphylococci. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.31:211-217.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Egervärn, M., S. Roos, and H. Lindmark. 2009. Identification and characterization of antibiotic resistance genes in Lactobacillus reuteri and Lactobacillus plantarum. J. Appl. Microbiol.107:1658-1668.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Kadlec, K., R. Ehricht, S. Monecke, U. Steinacker, H. Kaspar, J. Mankertz, and S. Schwarz. 2009. Diversity of antimicrobial resistance pheno- and genotypes of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 from diseased swine. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.64:1156-1164.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Kadlec, K., and S. Schwarz. 2009. Identification of a novel ABC transporter gene, vga(C), located on a multiresistance plasmid from a porcine methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 strain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.53:3589-3591.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Kadlec, K., and S. Schwarz. 2009. Identification of a novel trimethoprim resistance gene, dfrK, in a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 strain and its physical linkage to the tetracycline resistance gene tet(L). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.53:776-778.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Kehrenberg, C., C. Cuny, B. Strommenger, S. Schwarz, and W. Witte. 2009. Methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains of clonal lineages ST398 and ST9 from swine carry the multidrug resistance gene cfr. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.53:779-781.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Lüthje, P., and S. Schwarz. 2007. Molecular basis of resistance to macrolides and lincosamides among staphylococci and streptococci from various animal sources collected in the resistance monitoring program BfT-GermVet. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents29:528-535.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Lüthje, P., and S. Schwarz. 2006. Antimicrobial resistance of coagulase-negative staphylococci from bovine subclinical mastitis with particular reference to macrolide-lincosamide resistance phenotypes and genotypes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.57:966-969.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Nienhoff, U., K. Kadlec, I. F. Chaberny, J. Verspohl, G.-F. Gerlach, S. Schwarz, D. Simon, and I. Nolte. 2009. Transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains between humans and dogs: two case reports. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.64:660-662.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Pang, Y., T. Bosch, and M. C. Roberts. 1994. Single polymerase chain reaction for the detection of tetracycline-resistant determinants Tet K and Tet L. Mol. Cell. Probes8:417-422.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Roberts, M. C., Y. Pang, D. E. Riley, S. L. Hillier, R. C. Berger, and J. N. Krieger. 1993. Detection of Tet M and Tet O tetracycline resistance genes by polymerase chain reaction. Mol. Cell. Probes7:387-393.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Roberts, M. C., J. Sutcliffe, P. Courvalin, L. B. Jensen, J. Rood, and H. Seppala. 1999. Nomenclature for macrolide and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance determinants. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.43:2823-2830.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Schwarz, S., K. Kadlec, and B. Strommenger. 2008. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius detected in the BfT-GermVet monitoring programme 2004-2006 in Germany. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.61:282-285.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Strommenger, B., C. Kehrenberg, C. Kettlitz, C. Cuny, J. Verspohl, W. Witte, and S. Schwarz. 2006. Molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains from pet animals and their relationship to human isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.57:461-465.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    Tannock, G. W., J. B. Luchansky, L. Miller, H. Connell, S. Thode-Andersen, A. A. Mercer, and T. R. Klaenhammer. 1994. Molecular characterization of a plasmid-borne (pGT633) erythromycin resistance determinant (ermGT) from Lactobacillus reuteri 100-63. Plasmid31:60-71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Tsai, J. C., P. R. Hsueh, H. J. Chen, S. P. Tseng, P. Y. Chen, and L. J. Teng. 2005. The erm(T) gene is flanked by IS1216V in inducible erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. pasteurianus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.49:4347-4350.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    van den Eede, A., A. Martens, U. Lipinska, M. Struelens, A. Deplano, O. Denis, F. Haesebrouck, F. Gasthuys, and K. Hermans. 2009. High occurrence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in equine nasal samples. Vet. Microbiol.133:138-144.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    van Duijkeren, E., M. D. Jansen, S. C. Flemming, H. de Neeling, J. A. Wagenaar, A. H. W. Schoormans, A. van Nes, and A. C. Fluit. 2007. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pigs with exudative epidermitis. Emerg. Infect. Dis.13:1408-1410.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Voss, A., F. Loeffen, J. Bakker, C. Klaassen, and M. Wulf. 2005. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pig farming. Emerg. Infect. Dis.11:1965-1966.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    Weisblum, B. 1995. Insights into erythromycin action from studies of its activity as inducer of resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.39:797-805.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    Werckenthin, C., S. Schwarz, and M. C. Roberts. 1996. Integration of pT181-like tetracycline resistance plasmids into large staphylococcal plasmids involves IS257. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.40:2542-2544.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    Werckenthin, C., S. Schwarz, and H. Westh. 1999. Structural alterations in the translational attenuator of constitutively expressed ermC genes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.43:1681-1685.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    Whitehead, T. R., and M. A. Cotta. 2001. Sequence analyses of a broad host-range plasmid containing ermT from a tylosin-resistant Lactobacillus sp. isolated from swine feces. Curr. Microbiol.43:17-20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Witte, W., B. Strommenger, C. Stanek, and C. Cuny. 2007. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in humans and animals, Central Europe. Emerg. Infect. Dis.13:255-258.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    Woodbury, R. L., K. A. Klammer, Y. Xiong, T. Bailiff, A. Glennen, J. M. Bartkus, R. Lynfield, C. Van Beneden, and B. W. Beall for the Active Bacterial Core Surveillance Team. 2008. Plasmid-borne erm(T) from invasive, macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.52:1140-1143.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    Wulf, M. W., A. Markestein, F. T. van der Linden, A. Voss, C. Klaassen, and C. M. Verduin. 2008. First outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in a Dutch hospital, June 2007. Euro Surveill.13:8051.
    OpenUrlPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Identification of a Plasmid-Borne Resistance Gene Cluster Comprising the Resistance Genes erm(T), dfrK, and tet(L) in a Porcine Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 Strain
Kristina Kadlec, Stefan Schwarz
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jan 2010, 54 (2) 915-918; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01091-09

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Identification of a Plasmid-Borne Resistance Gene Cluster Comprising the Resistance Genes erm(T), dfrK, and tet(L) in a Porcine Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 Strain
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Identification of a Plasmid-Borne Resistance Gene Cluster Comprising the Resistance Genes erm(T), dfrK, and tet(L) in a Porcine Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 Strain
Kristina Kadlec, Stefan Schwarz
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jan 2010, 54 (2) 915-918; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01091-09
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Nucleotide sequence accession number.
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Anti-Bacterial Agents
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Multigene Family
plasmids
Tetracycline Resistance

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596