Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mechanisms of Resistance

Mutant Selection Window and Characterization of Allelic Diversity for Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Mutants of Rhodococcus equi

Hidekazu Niwa, Brent A. Lasker
Hidekazu Niwa
1Microbiology Division, Epizootic Research Center, Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Shimotsuke, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brent A. Lasker
2Bacterial Zoonoses Branch, Division of Foodborne, Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Zoonotic, Vector-Borne and Enteric Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: blasker@cdc.gov
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01670-09
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The mutant prevention concentration (MPC) for ciprofloxacin was determined for two Rhodococcus equi strains. The MPC for both strains was 32 μg/ml, which is above the peak serum concentration of ciprofloxacin obtainable by oral administration in humans. Nine single nucleotide changes corresponding to eight amino acid substitutions in the quinolone resistance-determining regions of DNA gyrase subunits A and B were characterized. Only mutants with amino acid changes in Ser-83 of GyrA were highly resistant (≥64 μg/ml). Our results suggest that ciprofloxacin monotherapy against R. equi infection may result in the emergence of ciprofloxacin-resistant mutants.

Rhodococcus equi, a facultative intracellular Gram-positive coccobacillus phylogenetically related to the genus Mycobacterium, is a known cause of suppurative pneumonia and ulcerative enteritis in 1- to 3-month-old foals (24). R. equi is also known as an important pathogen of immunosuppressed human patients (27). Recently, fluoroquinolones have been used in humans and have also been used on an experimental basis to treat horses for R. equi infection (8, 17, 25). Although the majority of clinical isolates of R. equi from previous surveillance studies were reported to be susceptible to fluoroquinolones (1, 16, 21), treatment failures and fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates have been reported (12, 19, 22).

The development of bacterial resistance has been hypothesized to be due in part to the use of antibiotics at therapeutic doses that usually block only the growth of susceptible wild-type cells (5, 6). However, under these conditions, the concentration may be too low to eliminate the small numbers of spontaneous drug-resistant mutants in the population of infecting bacteria. Drug-resistant mutants in the infecting population were hypothesized to be enriched during growth within a drug concentration range known as the mutant selection window (MSW) (5, 6). The lower boundary of the MSW is the MIC99 of the drug. The upper boundary consists of the mutant prevention concentration (MPC), defined as the drug concentration that inhibits the growth of the subpopulation of cells that are the least susceptible due to spontaneous single-step mutants in the population. Experimentally, MPC is the lowest drug concentration that prevents mutant bacterial colony formation from ≥1010 CFU (4). This suggests that maintaining antibiotic concentrations above the MPC throughout therapy may reduce the chance for enrichment of single-step resistance mutants and selection of high-level resistance. A higher level of resistance would be a rare event since it would require the acquisition of two or more spontaneous mutations by bacterial cells.

Niwa et al. (20) previously reported on the association between fluoroquinolone resistance and a single amino acid substitution in the quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) of DNA gyrase subunit A gene (gyrA) of R. equi. However, susceptibility was determined only at a single drug concentration, and the diversity of the mutant population was not examined over a variable range of ciprofloxacin concentrations using a large number of cells. Therefore, in order to determine the risk of selecting for ciprofloxacin resistance and to correlate mutations with a resistance phenotype in R. equi, we determined the MPC and characterized the diversity of ciprofloxacin-resistant mutants by DNA sequence analysis of the QRDR in the target genes encoding DNA gyrase subunit A (gyrA) and subunit B (gyrB).

R. equi strain W5234 was isolated from an HIV-positive patient, and R. equi strain ATCC 6939T was isolated from a lung abscess of a foal (14). R. equi cells were grown in brain heart infusion broth (Becton Dickinson and Co., LePont de Claix, France) for 48 h at 35°C with vigorous shaking, harvested by centrifugation, and then resuspended in 20 ml of fresh brain heart infusion broth. The numbers of CFU/ml were determined by plating serial 10-fold dilutions on drug-free Columbia blood agar base plates (Becton Dickenson and Co.). At least 1 × 1010 cells were applied onto five Columbia blood agar base plates containing various concentrations of ciprofloxacin (USP, Rockville, MD). The agar plates were examined for the emergence of ciprofloxacin-resistant colonies after incubation at 35°C for 4 days. The MIC99 was determined after individual ciprofloxacin-resistant colonies were counted. The fraction of resistant colonies recovered from the agar plates was plotted against the drug concentration, and the MPC was determined. The MICs of ciprofloxacin for parent strains and mutants were determined by the broth microdilution method using cation-supplemented Mueller-Hinton broth (Difco, Detroit, MI) according to the guidelines of the current NCCLS/CLSI M24-A standard (2). At least two ciprofloxacin-resistant mutants were selected at each concentration. Mutants were confirmed by a combination of two passages on an agar plate whose drug concentration was the same as that upon which the mutant was selected and one passage on a drug-free agar plate. Each experiment was carried out twice.

Figure 1 shows the MSW of ciprofloxacin for two R. equi strains (double arrow). The number of colonies recovered dropped gradually until reaching a plateau at approximately 1 to 4 μg/ml and then dropped a second time at higher drug concentrations. The MIC, MIC99, and MPC (Fig. 1, vertical arrows) of both W5234 and ATCC 6939T were 0.5, 0.42, and 32 μg/ml, respectively. In comparison, the Cmax for ciprofloxacin, the maximum concentration that can be achieved in serum, is 2.5 to 4.4 μg/ml (4, 13). The AUC24, the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to 24 h, is 24 μg·h/ml (26). The AUC24/MPC and AUC24/MIC ratios for both strains of R. equi were 0.75 h and 48 h, respectively. In comparison, an increase in resistance was observed when the AUC24/MIC ratio ranged between 20 and 150 h in a rabbit model of infection by Staphylococcus aureus (3), and the greatest increase in fluoroquinolone resistance was observed at an AUC24/MIC ratio of 24 to 62 h (7). With fluoroquinolones, an AUC24/MPC ratio ranging between 20 and 70 restricts the emergence of resistance mutants (6). The low AUC24/MPC ratio of 0.75 obtained for both isolates of R. equi again indicates the potential to enrich the mutant population. Together, our results suggest that monotherapy using ciprofloxacin against R. equi infection may be of high risk for the emergence of ciprofloxacin-resistant mutants since the obtainable therapeutic doses clearly remain within the MSW. Similarly, resistance of Mycobacteriumtuberculosis during levofloxacin monotherapy has been reported (9, 23). These results indicate that careful use of fluoroquinolones for the treatment of infection with R. equi and monitoring of MICs during the administration of ciprofloxacin should be considered.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Effect of ciprofloxacin concentration on recovery of single-step ciprofloxacin-resistant mutants. R. equi ATCC strain W6939T (open squares) and R. equi strain W5234 (open circles) were applied to Columbia blood agar base agar plates supplemented with ciprofloxacin and then incubated for 4 days. Cell survival is shown as the fraction of ciprofloxacin-resistant colonies relative to the number of CFU applied to ciprofloxacin-free plates. The small downward arrow indicates the MIC99, whereas the larger downward arrow indicates the mutant prevention concentration (MPC) for ciprofloxacin. The horizontal double arrow shows the mutant selection window. Cmax is denoted by the thick horizontal line.

To determine the correlation between ciprofloxacin susceptibility and genetic variation, the parent strains and ciprofloxacin-resistant mutants were characterized by sequence analysis of the QRDR of gyrA and gyrB as described previously (20). Totals of 36 and 38 ciprofloxacin-resistant colonies were obtained from R. equi strains W5234 and ATCC 6939T, respectively, at the ciprofloxacin concentrations shown in Fig. 2. The correlation between each amino acid substitution and the ciprofloxacin concentration is presented in Table 1. Nine nucleotide mutants corresponding to seven different amino acid substitutions denoted as mutant types I to VII in gyrA were observed in 56 of 74 mutants. Importantly, high-level resistance (MIC of ≥64 μg/ml), was observed only for mutants harboring amino acid substitutions at Ser-83. These mutants were isolated from plates containing a relatively high level of ciprofloxacin (≥12 μg/ml) but not at a lower drug concentration. The high level of ciprofloxacin resistance in mutants with amino acid substitutions at Ser-83 suggests that this amino acid may play an important function in reducing the affinity of the active site of DNA gyrase to quinolones (11). Mutants with an intermediate level of resistance (8 μg/ml to 32 μg/ml) were also identified (Table 1). These mutants were obtained from plates with lower ciprofloxacin concentrations of 8 to 16 μg/ml. A single amino acid substitution, Asn-464 to Asp, was detected in the QRDR of gyrB. The Asn-464 to Asp mutation in the QRDR of gyrB has been previously observed in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18). In 18 of 74 resistant colonies, nucleotide changes were not observed in the QRDR of either the gyrA or gyrB gene of W5234 and ATCC 6939T (Table 1). Two of 18 non-gyrase mutants had an intermediate MIC of 16 to 32 μg/ml, whereas 16 of 18 mutants showed low levels of resistance. Resistance in non-gyrase mutants may be due to an alteration of membrane permeability or the activation of efflux pumps, whereas high levels of resistance were only associated with substitutions in the target enzyme (21, 29). Alternatively, resistance to ciprofloxacin in the non-gyrase mutants may be due to mutations in the genes for topoisomerase IV (parC and parE) that were previously identified as a target for fluoroquinolones (6, 11, 18, 26); however, parC and parE have not been identified in other mycolic acid-containing bacteria phylogenetically related to R. equi (10, 28). Overall, resistant mutants detected in the wild-type population were diverse and may be a clinically relevant reservoir following enrichment within the MSW.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Effect of ciprofloxacin concentration on the diversity of ciprofloxacin-resistant R. equi mutations. Each section shows the resistance mutation alleles recovered from agar plates supplemented with the indicated concentration of ciprofloxacin (μg/ml). Vertical bars indicate the number of mutants analyzed; black bars represent mutants derived from R. equi W5234, and gray bars represent mutants derived from R. equi ATCC 6939T. All amino acid substitutions were in GyrA except N464Da, derived from an amino acid substitution in GyrB.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Correlation among amino acid substitutions in GyrA and GyrB, concentrations of ciprofloxacin on which mutants were selected, and MICs

In this study, we investigated the potential risk for the emergence of ciprofloxacin resistance in R. equi by determining its MSW. Molecular characterization of the mutations associated with ciprofloxacin phenotypes may provide an important adjunct diagnostic tool for patient management to reduce the emergence of resistance. Although fluoroquinolones are still effective and requisite agents against most clinical strains of R. equi infection of humans and horses, further study will be needed for better dosing regimens of ciprofloxacin, or a combination of agents, to treat R. equi infection while preventing the emergence of resistant mutants.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The GenBank sequence accession numbers for the partial nucleotide sequences of the gyrA and gyrB ciprofloxacin-resistant mutants isolated in this study are GQ468775 to GQ468790 and GQ369761 to GQ369763, respectively.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 25 November 2009.
    • Returned for modification 1 March 2010.
    • Accepted 17 May 2010.
  • Copyright © 2010 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Bowersock, T. L., S. A. Salmon, E. S. Portis, J. F. Prescott, D. A. Robison, C. W. Ford, and J. L. Watts. 2000. MICs of oxazolidinone for Rhodococcus equi strains isolated from humans and animals. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.44:1367-1369.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    CLSI/NCCLS. 2003. Susceptibility testing for mycobacteria, nocardiae, and other aerobic actinomycetes. Approved standard M24-A. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA.
  3. 3.↵
    Cui, J., Y. Liu, R. Wang, W. Tong, K. Drlica, and X. Xhao. 2006. The mutant selection window in rabbits infected with Staphylococcus aureus. J. Infect. Dis.194:1601-1608.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Dong, Y., X. Zhao, B. N. Kreiswirth, and K. Drlica. 2000. Mutant protection concentration as a measure of antibiotic potency: studies with clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.44:2581-2584.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Drlica, K. 2003. The mutant selection window and antimicrobial resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.52:11-17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Drlica, K., and X. Zhao. 2007. Mutant selection window hypothesis updated. Clin. Infect. Dis.44:681-688.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Firsov, A. A., S. N. Vostrov, I. Y. Lubenko, K. Drlica, Y. A. Portnoy, and S. H. Zinner. 2003. In vitro pharmacodynamic evaluation of the mutant selection window hypothesis using four fluoroquinolones against Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.47:1604-1613.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Giguere, S., and J. F. Prescott. 1997. Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Rhodococcus equi infections in foals. Vet. Microbiol.56:313-334.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Ginsburg, A. S., S. C. Woowine, N. Hooper, W. H. Benjamin, Jr., W. R. Bishai, S. E. Dorman, and T. R. Sterling. 2003. The rapid development of fluoroquinolone resistance in M. tuberculosis. N. Engl. J. Med.349:1977-1978.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Guillemin, I., V. Jarlier, and E. Cambau. 1998. Correlation between quinolone susceptibility patterns and sequences in the A and B subunits of DNA gyrase in Mycobacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.42:2084-2088.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Hopkins, K. L., R. H. Davies, and E. J. Threlfall. 2005. Mechanisms of quinolone resistance in Escherichia coli and Salmonella: recent developments. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents25:358-373.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Hsueh, P. R., C. C. Hung, L. J. Teng, M. C. Yu, Y. C. Chen, H. K. Wang, and K. T. Luh. 1998. Report of invasive Rhodococcus equi infections in Taiwan, with an emphasis on the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains. Clin. Infect. Dis.27:370-375.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Israel, D., G. Gillum, M. Turik, K. Harvey, J. Ford, H. Dalton, M. Towle, R. Echols, A. H. Heller, and R. Polk. 1993. Pharmacokinetics and serum bactericidal titers of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin following multiple oral doses in healthy volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.37:2193-2199.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Magnusson, H. 1923. Spezifische infektiose Pneumonie beim Fohlen. Ein neuer Eiterreger beim Pferd. Arch. Wiss. Prakt. Tierhelkd.50:22-28.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.
    Reference deleted.
  16. 16.↵
    McNeil, M. M., and J. M. Brown. 1992. Distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of Rhodococcus equi from clinical specimens. Eur. J. Epidemiol.8:437-443.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Moretti, F., E. Quiros-Roldan, S. Casari, P. Viale, A. Chiodera, and G. Carosi. 2002. Rhodococcus equi: pulmonary cavitation lesion in patient infected with HIV cured by levofloxacin and rifampicin. AIDS16:1440-1442.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Mouneimne, H., J. Robert, V. Jarlier, and E. Cambau. 1999. Type II topoisomerase mutations in ciprofloxacin-resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.43:62-66.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Munoz, P., J. Palomo, J. Guinea, J. Yanez, M. Giannella, and E. Bouza. 2008. Relapsing Rhodococcus equi infection in a heart transplant recipient successfully treated with long-term linezolid. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.60:197-199.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Niwa, H., S. Hobo, and T. Anzai. 2006. A nucleotide mutation associated with fluoroquinolone resistance observed in gyrA of in vitro obtained Rhodococcus equi mutants. Vet. Microbiol.115:264-268.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Niwa, H., S. Hobo, T. Anzai, and T. Higuchi. 2005. Antimicrobial susceptibility of 616 Rhodococcus equi strains isolated from tracheobronchial aspirates of foals suffering from respiratory disease in Japan. J. Equine Sci.16:99-104.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    Nordmann, P., E. Rouveix, M. Guenounou, and M. H. Nicolas. 1992. Pulmonary abscess due to a rifampin and fluoroquinolone resistant Rhodococcus equi strain in a HIV infected patient. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.11:557-558.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    Perlman, D. C., W. M. El Sadr, L. B. Heifets, E. T. Nelson, J. P. Matts, K. Chirgwin, N. Salomon, E. E. Telzak, O. Klein, B. N. Kreiswirth, J. M. Musser, and R. Hafner for the Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS 019 and the AIDS Clinical Trials Group 222 Protocol Team. 1997. Susceptibility to levofloxacin of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from patients with HIV-related tuberculosis and characterization of a strain with levofloxacin monoresistance. AIDS11:1473-1478.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    Prescott, J. F. 1991. Rhodococcus equi: an animal and human pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.4:20-34.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    Scotton, P. G., E. Tonon, M. Giobbia, M. Gallucci, R. Rigoli, and A. Vaglia. 2000. Rhodococcus equi nosocomial meningitis cured by levofloxacin and shunt removal. Clin. Infect. Dis.30:223-224.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    Van Bambeke, F., J. M. Michot, J. Van Eldere, and P. M. Tulkens. 2005. Quinolones in 2005: an update. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.11:256-280.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    Weinstock, D. M., and A. E. Brown. 2002. Rhodococcus equi: an emerging pathogen. Clin. Infect. Dis.34:1379-1385.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Zhao, X., and K. Drlica. 2002. Restricting the selection of antibiotic-resistant mutant bacteria: measurement and potential use of the mutant selection window. J. Infect. Dis.185:561-565.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    Zhou, J., Y. Dong, X. Zhao, S. Lee, A. Amin, S. Ramaswamy, J. Domagala, J. M. Musser, and K. Drlica. 2000. Selection of antibiotic-resistant bacterial mutants: allelic diversity among fluoroquinolone-resistant mutations. J. Infect. Dis.182:517-525.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Mutant Selection Window and Characterization of Allelic Diversity for Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Mutants of Rhodococcus equi
Hidekazu Niwa, Brent A. Lasker
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jul 2010, 54 (8) 3520-3523; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01670-09

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mutant Selection Window and Characterization of Allelic Diversity for Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Mutants of Rhodococcus equi
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Mutant Selection Window and Characterization of Allelic Diversity for Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Mutants of Rhodococcus equi
Hidekazu Niwa, Brent A. Lasker
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jul 2010, 54 (8) 3520-3523; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01670-09
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

alleles
Anti-Bacterial Agents
ciprofloxacin
Drug Resistance, Bacterial
mutation
Rhodococcus equi
Selection, Genetic

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596