Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Susceptibility

Overcoming Drug Resistance with Alginate Oligosaccharides Able To Potentiate the Action of Selected Antibiotics

Saira Khan, Anne Tøndervik, Håvard Sletta, Geir Klinkenberg, Charlotte Emanuel, Edvar Onsøyen, Rolf Myrvold, Robin A. Howe, Timothy R. Walsh, Katja E. Hill, David W. Thomas
Saira Khan
aWound Biology Group, Tissue Engineering and Reparative Dentistry, Cardiff University School of Dentistry, Cardiff, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Tøndervik
bSINTEF Materials and Chemistry, Trondheim, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Håvard Sletta
bSINTEF Materials and Chemistry, Trondheim, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Geir Klinkenberg
bSINTEF Materials and Chemistry, Trondheim, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charlotte Emanuel
aWound Biology Group, Tissue Engineering and Reparative Dentistry, Cardiff University School of Dentistry, Cardiff, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edvar Onsøyen
cAlgiPharma AS, Sandvika, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rolf Myrvold
cAlgiPharma AS, Sandvika, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robin A. Howe
dMicrobiology Cardiff (Velindre NHS Trust), UHW, Heath Park, Cardiff, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy R. Walsh
eDepartment of Medical Microbiology, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katja E. Hill
aWound Biology Group, Tissue Engineering and Reparative Dentistry, Cardiff University School of Dentistry, Cardiff, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David W. Thomas
aWound Biology Group, Tissue Engineering and Reparative Dentistry, Cardiff University School of Dentistry, Cardiff, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00525-12
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The uncontrolled, often inappropriate use of antibiotics has resulted in the increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens, with major cost implications for both United States and European health care systems. We describe the utilization of a low-molecular-weight oligosaccharide nanomedicine (OligoG), based on the biopolymer alginate, which is able to perturb multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria by modulating biofilm formation and persistence and reducing resistance to antibiotic treatment, as evident using conventional and robotic MIC screening and microscopic analyses of biofilm structure. OligoG increased (up to 512-fold) the efficacy of conventional antibiotics against important MDR pathogens, including Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, and Burkholderia spp., appearing to be effective with several classes of antibiotic (i.e., macrolides, β-lactams, and tetracyclines). Using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), increasing concentrations (2%, 6%, and 10%) of alginate oligomer were shown to have a direct effect on the quality of the biofilms produced and on the health of the cells within that biofilm. Biofilm growth was visibly weakened in the presence of 10% OligoG, as seen by decreased biomass and increased intercellular spaces, with the bacterial cells themselves becoming distorted and uneven due to apparently damaged cell membranes. This report demonstrates the feasibility of reducing the tolerance of wound biofilms to antibiotics with the use of specific alginate preparations.

INTRODUCTION

The evolution of multidrug resistance (MDR) represents an increasingly formidable challenge in the developed and developing worlds, having a colossal clinical and economic impact (26). This escalating problem is a major world-health issue, compounded by the lack of new antibiotics in development, particularly for Gram-negative MDR bacteria. The need for new strategies to improve the diagnosis and treatment of these infections is, therefore, acute (15, 16).

In vivo, the inability to eradicate bacteria from a diverse number of clinical situations ranging from the periodontal pocket to the cystic fibrosis (CF) lung has been attributed to the acquisition of a biofilm state (12, 13). Antimicrobial resistance can also arise by a plethora of mechanisms involving chromosomal mutations or horizontal gene transfer. Resistance may result from destruction of the antibiotic by, e.g., β-lactamases, typified by the recently described New-Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-1 (NDM-1) (21); mutations in specific antibiotic target sites, e.g., RNA polymerase and DNA gyrase (22); limitation of local antibiotic concentrations due to outer membrane lipid bilayer modifications or porin-mediated permeability (5); the action of specific multidrug efflux pump mechanisms, e.g., MexAB-OrpM (28); acquisition of resistance genes such as mecA in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (22); or the sequestration of antibiotics within the bacterial biofilm (25).

Attempts to develop (and screen) alternative antibacterial strategies to potentiate the activity of conventional antibiotics are becoming increasingly important. Antibacterial strategies have included use of antimicrobial cationic peptides (AMPs) (7); cell membrane permeabilization (7); molecular chaperones (e.g., heat shock proteins) (4); inhibitors of RecA-mediated strand exchange (34); inhibitors of DNA synthesis (6); inhibitors of penicillin-binding protein production (18); and use of efflux pump inhibitors or inhibitors of beta-lactamase expression (27). Despite almost 20 years of intense research, none of these agents deemed useful in vitro have progressed to clinical use.

Alginate is a biopolymer which is found in brown algae and bacterial extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) and is a linear polymer composed of (1–4)-linked α-l-guluronate (G) and β-d-mannuronate (M) residues. It is extensively utilized in foods and medicines (e.g., wound dressings) due to its physical cross-linking and gel-forming properties (30). Sodium alginate is recognized as safe by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (reference no. 21CFR184.1724). While naturally occurring alginate is polydispersed in relation to molecular weight and G/M composition, it is possible to generate polymers of defined molecular weight and also G/M composition (11), which have been employed to modulate immunological responses in vivo (35). Previous workers have highlighted the potential of nanoscale biosensor-based diagnostics for the detection of life-threatening bacterial infections (16). We describe here the development of the first polymer therapeutics (based on alginate oligosaccharides) designed to specifically modulate bacterial responses and treat infections of MDR bacteria, with phase IIa human clinical studies under way.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains.The strains used for susceptibility testing are shown in Table 1. They include both culture collection strains and clinical isolates: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 4), Burkholderia spp. (n = 4), Acinetobacter spp. (n = 4), Enterobacteriaceae spp. (n = 4), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 3), and Streptococcus oralis (n = 1). These isolates represent the most frequently encountered resistance types (aminoglycosides, carbapenems, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, monobactams, and penicillins).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Strains used for susceptibility testing and their known relevant genotypesa

Bacterial media and culture conditions.Bacterial colonies were grown on blood agar base no. 2 (BA; LabM) supplemented with 5% horse blood and tryptone soya broth (TSB; Oxoid) for liquid cultures. Biofilms were generated in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton (MH) broth (LabM). Biofilms were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). All antibiotics (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, United Kingdom, or Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd.) used were pharmaceutical grade and included the major classes of antibiotics (β-lactams, aminoglycosides, macrolides, tetracyclines, carbapenems, and polymyxins) employed in the treatment of these organisms. Ultrapurified pig gastric mucin glycoprotein (purified by Jeff Pearson, Newcastle University) and OligoG (2,600 Da, 90 to 95% G) were provided by AlgiPharma AS, Sandvika, Norway.

Synthesis of alginate oligosaccharides.OligoG was generated from alginate extracted from the stem of the locally sourced brown seaweed Laminaria hyperborea. Purification and fractionation of the resulting material yielded an oligomer with a high content of guluronate and a relatively narrow molecular-weight distribution. Final purification using charcoal filters was followed by spray drying. The test OligoG had 90% to 95% of the monomer residues as G residues (mean, 2,600 Mw; Fig. 1A). Purified OligoG was characterized by hydrogen-1 nuclear magnetic resonance (H-NMR) (Fig. 1B) and high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD; Fig. 1C). OligoG is anionic and highly soluble, although its solubility is limited by viscosity at higher concentrations (>15%), the rise in viscosity being offset to a degree by an increase in temperature. OligoG was tested at working concentrations of 2% to 10%, phase 1 studies having demonstrated that these concentrations are safe for clinical use (clinical phase 1 safety and toxicology studies; www.clinicaltrials.gov [identifier, NCT00970346]).

Fig 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1

Structure, purification, and quality control of OligoG. (A) Structures of α-l-guluronate (G) and β-d-manuronate (M); OligoG has at least 90% to 95% of the monomer residues as G residues. (B) NMR spectrum of OligoG containing 96% G. (C) Characterization of OligoG with high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD).

Alginate oligosaccharides of similar molecular weights but altered M content were generated via epimerisation technology and also tested. M-rich alginates (pure mannuronan) from a nonpathogenic high-expressing mutant (P. fluorescens NCIMB10525) were used as a substrate for mannuronan C-5-epimerase AlgE4, converting alternating M residues on the alginate backbone into G residues. These were developed with similar molecular-weight profiles and defined, based on G:M composition, as OligoM (100% M; 3,000 to 3,500 Mw) (11) and OligoMG (46% G; 4,000 to 4,500 Mw) (3).

Effects of OligoG on bacterial growth in liquid culture.The effects of alginate oligosaccharide OligoG on a collection of clinically relevant human Gram-negative and Gram-positive MDR and non-MDR pathogens (Table 1) were studied using robotic high-throughput screening (HTS; Beckman-Coulter) and conventional screening and a range (0% to 10%) of OligoG concentrations. Overnight (O/N) bacterial cultures grown in tryptone soya broth (TSB) were inoculated into Mueller-Hinton (MH) broth with increasing concentrations (0%, 2%, 6%, and 10%) of OligoG in microtiter plates. After cultivation for 19 h, cell densities were determined by measuring optical density at 600 nm (OD600). The OligoG-induced reduction in optical density observed in these assays correlates directly with reduced bacterial dry weight/biomass (data not shown).

Growth of biofilms for SEM imaging or LIVE/DEAD staining.The ability of OligoG to modulate the development of biofilms as well as their effect on 24-h biofilms in vitro was investigated. Overnight cultures of P. aeruginosa PAO1 were grown in TSB. After dilution of the bacterial cultures to 0.5 McFarland in MH broth with mucin (2.5 g/liter), 1 ml was transferred to the wells of a flat-bottom 12-well plate containing sterile plastic Thermanox coverslips (Agar Scientific, Essex, United Kingdom) for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) or glass coverslips (Fisher Scientific) for confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Plates were then wrapped in parafilm to prevent dehydration and incubated at 37°C for 6 h to allow biofilm formation. Planktonic cells and supernatant were removed and biofilms washed with 1 ml sterile PBS. Cells then were treated with a combination of OligoG (0%, 2%, 6%, and 10%) and mucin (2.5 g/liter) in 1 ml MH broth. Plates were then wrapped in parafilm and incubated at 37°C for 24 h with gentle agitation.

SEM of OligoG-treated Pseudomonas biofilms.Glutaraldehyde was added to OligoG-treated biofilms at a final concentration of 1.25% and fixed at room temperature for 24 h. The samples were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol concentrations, dried in a critical point dryer (CPD 030; Balzers, Germany), mounted on aluminum stubs, coated with gold in a sputter-coater (model AE 1231; EMscope, United Kingdom), and then viewed on a scanning electron microscope (XL-20; FEI-Philips, The Netherlands).

LIVE/DEAD staining and CLSM of OligoG-treated biofilms.The effect of OligoG on cell membrane integrity (a measure of cell death) was investigated using LIVE/DEAD BacLight stain (bacterial viability kit; Invitrogen). A 2-μl volume of each stain (green fluorescent SYTO9 and red-fluorescent propidium iodide) was added to 1 ml NaCl (0.85% [wt/vol]) and mixed and 100 μl added to each test sample. The preparation was incubated in the dark for 15 min and then analyzed by CLSM using a Leica TCS SP2 AOBS spectral confocal microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).

OligoG-treated gfp-labeled Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 biofilms and staining of biofilm matrix for CLSM.A gfp (green fluorescent protein)-labeled P. aeruginosa PAO1 derivative (20) was also used for CLSM. Overnight cultures of gfp-PAO1 were grown in TSB, and 10 μl was used to inoculate 1 ml MH broth with or without 2%, 6%, or 10% OligoG. Then, 200 μl of each was transferred to individual Coverwell incubation chamber gaskets (Invitrogen) with the addition of 40 μl BODIPY 630/650-X SE stain (Invitrogen), which stains extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) matrix components. The chamber gaskets were then sealed with a Histobond (R. A. Lamb Ltd., Eastbourne, United Kingdom) positively charged slide. Each unit was inverted and incubated for 18 h at 37°C to allow biofilm formation on the Histobond slide. Coverwell incubation chamber gaskets and any supernatant and planktonic cells were removed from the Histobond slide and replaced with a glass coverslip. Undisturbed biofilms were then visualized by CLSM as described above.

Susceptibility testing by MIC assay.Potentiation of alginate oligomers was studied using standard MICs (19) and confirmed by robotic HTS using a range of international MDR (i.e., resistant to 3 or more classes of antibiotics) and non-MDR Gram-negative and Gram-positive clinical isolates (Table 1). Isolates were grown overnight in TSB and then diluted in PBS until the OD625 was between 0.08 and 0.10 (equivalent to 0.5 McFarland standard; approximately 108 CFU/ml). Two-fold antibiotic serial dilutions were prepared in MH broth or MH broth with OligoG at 2%, 6%, or 10% in flat-bottom 96-well microtiter plates (100 μl in each well). The diluted bacterial cultures were diluted 10-fold in MH broth, and 5 μl was added to the microtiter plates containing the antibiotic serial dilutions to give a final concentration of 5 × 105 CFU/ml. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 16 to 20 h and MICs determined as the lowest concentration at which there was no visible growth. As well as conventional culture, a robotic high-throughput screening system (see below) was used to determine MICs.

Robotic HTS.Serial dilutions for MIC determinations were performed with a Tecan Genesis RSP 200 liquid-handling workstation equipped with an 8-channel pipetting tool using sterile disposable 200-μl barrier tips. The optical density of the cultures was measured using a Beckman Coulter Robotic Core system with an integrated Beckman Coulter Biomek NXP robotic liquid-handling unit, a Thermo Cytomat 2 450 S robotic incubator, and a Beckman Coulter Paradigm microplate reader. The 384-well microplates were incubated at 37°C for 19 h. The microplates were shaken at 1,800 rpm (2.5-mm amplitude) for 120 s prior to taking absorbance readings at 600 nm. HTS was used for determining the growth curves obtained at various concentrations of OligoG as well as for confirming the results from the conventional MIC testing.

Effect of pulmonary surfactant on antimicrobial efficacy of OligoGs.Previous studies have shown that surfactants in the lung can interact with antibiotics, for example, with daptomycin (33), resulting in an inhibition of antibacterial activity. Here, beractant (Survanta) (a natural bovine lung extract) was used to mimic lung surfactant to determine whether it interfered with the ability of the OligoG to enhance antibiotic antimicrobial activity. In these experiments, 10% beractant was incorporated into the MIC test with OligoG.

When beractant was added to MH broth, a white precipitate formed and persisted, even after incubation of the MIC plate at 37°C overnight. It was unclear if this apparent cloudiness was due to the beractant precipitating or to bacterial growth. As this obscured reading of the plates, to determine the MIC values for beractant, it was necessary to subculture 5 μl from each well of the MIC plate into fresh MH broth with overnight incubation at 37°C prior to determining the correct cutoff points between regrowth and clear wells.

Effect of OligoG on MexAB-OrpM efflux pump mutants.MIC assays were carried out as described above with or without OligoG using efflux pump P. aeruginosa PAO1 mutant strains alongside the wild-type strain. These included strain K1169, a mexB knockout lacking MexAB-OprM, and a nalB hyperexpression mutant of MexAB-OprM (10).

Effect of OligoG on bacterial motility.Two methods of motility testing were used. For the plate assay, overnight (O/N) cultures of Proteus mirabilis (NSM6) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PAO1) were grown in TSB at 37°C. Cultures were diluted 1:100 in MH broth supplemented with 0%, 0.2%, 0.5%, 2%, 6%, or 10% OligoG and reincubated for 18 h at 37°C. Iso-sensitest (ISO) agar plates (Oxoid) containing 0%, 0.5%, 2%, or 6% OligoG were prepared and inoculated with 10 μl of the MH cultures. (ISO plates with 10% OligoG were not used, as they did not set at that concentration.) Plates were incubated for 23 h at 37°C and values for distance of bacterial spread recorded at 2, 5, 7, 13, and 23 h.

For the stab assay, overnight cultures of P. mirabilis (NSM6) and P. aeruginosa PAO1 and control isolates of P. mirabilis (NCTC 11938), Staphylococcus aureus (NCTC 6571), P. aeruginosa (NCTC 10662), and Escherichia coli (NCTC 10418) were prepared in MH broth with or without OligoG as described above. Motility Test Agar (MTA; Mast Group Ltd., Bootle, United Kingdom) was supplemented with 0%, 0.2%, 0.5%, 2%, and 6% OligoG, with 5 ml pipetted into sterile bijou tubes. (MTA containing 10% OligoG also did not set.) The MTA was stab inoculated with the prepared MH broth cultures and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Motility appeared as a progressive lateral diffuse pink/red color in the MTA and was scored from 0 to 4 as previously described (2). Absence of growth beyond the track of inoculation was scored as 0, and growth throughout the medium was scored as 4.

Testing development of resistance to OligoG.Daily subculturing of P. aeruginosa PAO1 in MH broth or MH broth with 10% OligoG was carried out over a 16-day period (>160 generations). Serial passage in escalating concentrations (0.1%, 1%, and 10%) of OligoG was also undertaken (n = 7 days for each concentration). MIC assays of the control and test cultures (on day 16 and day 21, respectively) were then performed to see if there were any apparent differences.

RESULTS

Effects of OligoG on growth of MDR bacteria.OligoG was found to reduce bacterial proliferation in liquid culture at 19 h (Fig. 2). This effect was dose dependent for the concentration range investigated (0%, 2%, 6%, and 10%), showing a general decrease in percent change (compared to the control) with increasing OligoG concentration. These effects were particularly striking for the Gram-negative pathogens P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii and Burkholderia spp., and Enterobactericeae.

Fig 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2

Effect of increasing concentrations of OligoG (0%, 2%, 6%, and 10%) on cell densities after cultivation for 19 h for various Gram-negative bacterial species. (*, data not significantly different from control results; P > 0.05).

Effects of OligoG on biofilms generated by MDR Gram-negative bacteria examined using conventional light, scanning electron, and confocal laser scanning microscopy.SEM, LIVE/DEAD BacLight staining of PAO1 biofilms, and CLSM of gfp-labeled PAO1 biofilms generated in the presence of OligoG revealed dose-related changes (Fig. 3). Increasing concentrations (0% to 10%) of OligoG resulted in disruption of established 24-h biofilms (demonstrable by cell damage and disruption of cellular content as visualized by SEM), increased cell death (LIVE/DEAD staining), and decreased cellular density (CLSM) in the developed biofilm. CLSM showed that OligoG was able to considerably reduce gfp-labeled PAO1 biofilm formation, with clear dose-dependent alterations in the 3-dimensional structural organization of cells in the biofilm. These changes were also associated with increasing numbers of nonviable bacteria seen by LIVE/DEAD staining.

Fig 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3

Growth of 24-h Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 biofilms in 0%, 2%, 6%, or 10% OligoG visualized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) or confocal laser scanning microscopy (CSLM) of LIVE/DEAD staining (green, live; red, dead) or CSLM of green fluorescent protein (Gfp)-labeled PAO1 with counterstaining using BODIPY 630/650-X SE extracellular polysaccharide dye.

The ability of alginate oligomers to potentiate the effect of existing antibiotics on Gram-negative MDR pathogens.The ability of alginate oligomers to potentiate the activity of the principal classes of antibiotics commonly employed in clinical practice in the treatment of Gram-negative infections (cephalosporins, macrolides, quinolones, monobactams, tetracyclines, and carbapenems) was assessed, with selected results for three antibiotic classes shown in Table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

MICs of antibiotics alone and with increasing concentrations (2%, 6%, and 10%) of OligoG for a range of MDR clinical isolates

OligoG treatment reduced (by up to 512-fold) the MICs of a range of antibiotics, including macrolides (azithromycin, erythromycin, spiromycin, and clarithromycin), aztreonam, ceftazidime, oxytetracycline, and ciprofloxacin. For example, P. aeruginosa V2 showed a ceftazidime MIC reduction from 16 to 0.5 μg/ml, representing a change from untreatable (>8 μg/ml) (9) to treatable (<8 μg/ml) levels (0% and 10% OligoG, respectively; Table 2). This potentiation effect was particularly marked for the genus Burkholderia. Interestingly, while this potentiation was not seen in the control OligoMG oligomer, a similar, although smaller, effect (up to 32-fold reduction for P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii; data not shown) was evident in part for OligoM. Specific antibiotic combination effects (using two antibiotics) were also particularly evident (data not shown); for example, using A. baumannii and ceftazidime or ciprofloxacin with azithromycin at 1 μg/ml and 10% OligoG resulted in a reduction in the MIC of these combination antibiotics to <1 μg/ml or <0.25 μg/ml, respectively (representing a >512-fold reduction). Similar potentiation, although a lesser effect, was observed with Gram-positive isolates (Table 2). OligoG-antibiotic synergy was not evident for every combination studied. Moreover, no potentiation was seen for the aminoglycoside (tobramycin and amikacin) or the polymyxin (colistin) antibiotics for any bacteria tested.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, performed in the presence and absence of artificial surfactant (to mimic the lung environment and investigate any potential nonspecific inhibition which may occur in vivo), showed no apparent effect of OligoG at any tested concentration (0% to 10%; data not shown).

Mechanistic cellular and molecular studies to determine the mode of action of OligoG.The addition of OligoG appeared to modulate cellular structure. However, this did not appear to correlate with increased bacterial cell membrane permeability, as the effect contrasted with that observed with an EDTA control (data not shown). Longitudinal studies employing P. aeruginosa PAO1 MexAB-OrpM mutants also demonstrated that the effect of OligoG was not mediated via interaction with this efflux pump system, as no differences in MIC determinations with OligoG were noted using wild-type strains or knockout or hyperexpression mutants of MexAB-OrpM, showing that OligoG was not a substrate of MexAB-OrpM (data not shown). Interestingly, motility test agar stabs showed that OligoG (6%) was able to almost completely inhibit motility in P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and P. mirabilis (Fig. 4A). Furthermore, swarming motility in Proteus sp. was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner with increasing concentrations of OligoG (0% to 6%), but the effect was predominant in the presence of OligoG (Fig. 4B). Importantly, when the bacteria were exposed to OligoG only in the initial liquid growth medium (and not in the agar plate onto which they were then inoculated), the effect of OligoG was almost, but not quite, completely lost, showing a slight “carryover” of effect after exposure to OligoG was removed (Fig. 4C).

Fig 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4

Motility testing. (A) Motility test agar with or without OligoG inoculated with S. aureus (negative control; NCTC 6571), P. aeruginosa (PAO1), E. coli (NCTC 10418), or P. mirabilis (NSM6). (B) Broth cultures of P. mirabilis (NSM6) grown in MH broth (no OligoG) and plated on ISO agar containing 0%, 0.5%, 2%, or 6% OligoG. (C) Broth cultures of P. mirabilis (NSM6) grown in MH broth with 0%, 0.5%, 2%, 6%, or 10% OligoG and plated on ISO agar (no OligoG).

Resistance to OligoG.MIC determinations of P. aeruginosa PAO1 grown in OligoG for prolonged serial subculture and in escalating concentrations of OligoG showed that there was no difference between the test (with OligoG) and control results, indicating no buildup of resistance to OligoG in this time period (data not shown).

DISCUSSION

The functional properties of alginates are strongly correlated with their M/G ratio and with their uronic acid sequence (31). Initial experiments showed that treatment with OligoG impaired bacterial growth. These observed effects were bacteriostatic and may be related to the ability of alginates to chelate cations, particularly iron (32). G subunits are known to show preferential binding to cations such as Ca2+, although not all cations appear to utilize the G subunits as preferred binding sites (24). The magnitude of the antimicrobial effect was considerably potentiated using these low-molecular-weight OligoG oligomers. This inhibition was evident in the studies on bacterial biofilms, where OligoG not only inhibited biofilm formation and resulted in disruption of established 24-h biofilms but also potentiated antibiotic treatment. This observation was at first counterintuitive, as alginate per se is an important component of the EPS of certain bacterial biofilms and therapies targeting alginate, e.g., alginate lyases are currently being developed as antibiofilm therapies (23). However, unlike alginates derived from algae, bacterial alginates from most bacteria, such as P. aeruginosa, differ considerably structurally, having an absence of G blocks (homopolymeric regions of poly-l-guluronate) (31), which may be a contributing factor in these observed antimicrobial effects.

Structural analysis of the biofilms indicated that OligoG treatment was associated with increased cellular “clumping” and disruption of cellular contents. Hence, the mechanism by which OligoG exerts its effect could simply have been the result of permeabilization of the bacterial membrane, which is the mode of action of a number of antibiotics. However, permeabilization does not appear to be responsible for the cellular membrane changes induced by OligoG treatment, since they contrasted markedly with those observed with permeabilizing agents (EDTA; data not shown). This membrane effect, independent of permeability changes, was reassuring, as, while a number of “permeabilizing” antimicrobial agents have been developed, progress to clinical utility has been hampered by formulation difficulties and nonspecific permeabilization-toxicity concerns (14). The lack of permeabilization reflected the bacteriostatic activity of the oligomers observed in the HTS growth assay. OligoG treatment (both alone and in combination with antibiotics) clearly altered the bacterial membrane. Membrane disruption in AMPs, via the ionic displacement of divalent cations (Mg2+ and Ca2+), has been previously described and is a recognized mechanism by which the action of antibiotics may be potentiated (8). While many antimicrobials act on the biosynthetic pathways of growing cells, the bacterial membrane represents an important target in the treatment of quiescent nonreplicating bacteria in recalcitrant infection such as the CF lung (17). A number of agents have been developed that modulate changes in the bacterial membrane (via alterations in NADH2 and ATP synthase and, indirectly, via generation of lethal reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide in the bacterial membrane). The observation of the putative, but as-yet-unidentified, membrane effect seen with OligoG is supported by the observed failure to develop resistance during prolonged treatment in longitudinal experiments. Weakened swarming motility has been shown to lead to an impaired ability to form simple biofilms (29). The impairment of bacterial motility by OligoG may, at least in part, explain its mode of action in motile bacteria. The finding that OligoG exhibits activity against a number of nonmotile bacterial species indicates, however, that other mechanisms are undoubtedly involved.

The potentiation of antibiotic therapy in the treatment of MDR organisms in persistent infections is a major goal of anti-infective therapy (17). Indeed, synergistic combined therapies appear to have increasing potential for future antibacterial therapies (1). In characterizing the ability of OligoG to potentiate the activity of conventional antibiotics against MDR organisms, we utilized conventional microbiological MIC assays. These experiments demonstrated that exposure to OligoG was able to decrease the MIC values of Gram-negative pathogens up to 512-fold in a range of MDR organisms tested. Moreover, the MIC levels were significantly reduced for a number of important Gram-negative and, to a lesser extent, Gram-positive pathogens (including MRSA). Furthermore, OligoG proved effective against a variety of multi- and pan-drug-resistant pathogens for which there are currently no or only limited treatments available and hence are often associated with mortality in infected individuals or which represent potential agents of bioterrorism (e.g., Burkholderia spp.). EUCAST MIC breakpoint tables (11) describe the use of azithromycin for the treatment of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi infections with an MIC of ≤16 mg/liter (for wild-type isolates). In this study, other Enterobacteriacae (encoding NDM-1) such as Escherichia coli (V7) showed an 8-fold MIC decrease for azithromycin, indicative that potentiation with OligoG had moved the MIC from >16 μg/ml in the resistance category (i.e., above the breakpoint) to ≤16 μg/ml in the sensitive category (i.e., below the breakpoint). Synergistic activity for organisms such as Burkholderia spp. is encouraging, since Burkholderia infection is associated with a fatality rate of almost 50% in infected cystic fibrosis patients. Overall, OligoG provides a major advancement in therapeutic development for the treatment of Gram-negative infections such as those caused by Burkholderia and Acinetobacter spp. for which effective treatment is currently extremely limited.

OligoG has been screened and proven for safety and tolerability in a series of animal and human experiments. Due to their physicochemical properties, alginates are widely employed in the food and pharmaceutical industry, and the lack of toxicity of inhaled (nebulized) OligoG in the animal and human phase 1 studies was, therefore, unsurprising (data not shown). While a number of in vitro antibiotic-potentiating agents have been cited in the literature, in vivo many have problems with potential safety and toxicity issues. The advantage of OligoG is that it is effectively inert and resists enzymatic degradation. The toxicity and pK studies demonstrate that the putative doses at which OligoG is effective in vitro are safely attainable in the lung in vivo.

OligoG represents a novel target nanomedicine for future clinical use. Its suitability for formulation in isotonic solution and safety-pharmacokinetic profiles all favor human use. Furthermore, phase IIa human clinical studies in CF patients are now ongoing.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by AlgiPharma AS, Sandvika, Norway.

We thank W. Rowe for SEM, A. Hayes for CLSM, and G. Skjåk-Bræk for the altered OligoM/OligoMG alginate oligosaccharide controls generated by epimerization technology. For bacterial strains, we thank M. Wootton (various clinical isolates), K.A. Krogfelt (gfp-labeled PAO1), and E. Mahenthiralingam (Burkholderia spp.).

D.W.T. and K.E.H. contributed equally to this work in both devising and directing the research, in analyzing the data, and in writing the manuscript.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 3 April 2012.
    • Returned for modification 10 May 2012.
    • Accepted 13 July 2012.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 23 July 2012.
  • Copyright © 2012, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ammons MCB,
    2. Ward LS,
    3. Fishera ST,
    4. Wolcott RD,
    5. James GA
    . 2009. In vitro susceptibility of established biofilms composed of a clinical wound isolate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa treated with lactoferrin and xylitol. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 33:230–236.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Aziz MA,
    2. Cabral JD,
    3. Brooks HJL,
    4. Moratti SC,
    5. Hanton LR
    . 2012. Antimicrobial properties of a chitosan dextran-based hydrogel for surgical use. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56:280–287.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Campa C,
    2. et al
    . 2004. Biochemical analysis of the processive mechanism for epimerization of alginate by mannuronan C-5 epimerase AlgE4. Biochem. J. 381:155–164.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Cardoso K,
    2. et al
    . 2010. DnaK and GroEL are induced in response to antibiotic and heat shock in Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Med. Microbiol. 59:1061–1068.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Delcour AH
    . 2009. Outer membrane permeability and antibiotic resistance. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1794:808–816.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Dutta NK,
    2. Mazumdar K,
    3. Park JH
    . 2009. In vitro synergistic effect of gentamicin with the anti-inflammatory agent diclofenac against Listeria monocytogenes. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 48:783–785.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Eckert R,
    2. et al
    . 2006. Enhancement of antimicrobial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa by coadministration of G10KHc and tobramycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:3833–3838.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Estrela AB,
    2. Heck MG,
    3. Abraham W-R
    . 2009. Novel approaches to control biofilm infections. Curr. Med. Chem. 16:1512–1530.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 2011. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 1.3, January 5, 2011. EUCAST, Växjö, Sweden. http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Disk_test_documents/EUCAST_breakpoints_v1.3_pdf.pdf.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Evans K,
    2. et al
    . 1998. Influence of the MexAB-OprM multidrug efflux system on quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 180:5443–5447.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Gimmestad M,
    2. et al
    . 2003. The Pseudomonas fluorescens AlgG protein, but not its mannuronan c-5-epimerase activity, is needed for alginate polymer formation. J. Bacteriol. 185:3515–3523.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Hall-Stoodley L,
    2. Costerton JW,
    3. Stoodley P
    . 2004. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2:95–108.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Hall-Stoodley L,
    2. Stoodley P
    . 2009. Evolving concepts in biofilm infections. Cell. Microbiol. 11:1034–1043.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Hancock REW,
    2. Sahl HG
    . 2006. Antimicrobial and host-defense peptides as new anti-infective therapeutic strategies. Nat. Biotechnol. 24:1551–1557.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Ho J,
    2. Tambyah PA,
    3. Paterson DL
    . 2010. Multiresistant Gram-negative infections: a global perspective. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 23:546–553.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Huber F,
    2. Lang HP,
    3. Gerber C
    . 2008. Biosensors: new leverage against superbugs. Nat. Nanotech. 3:645–646.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    1. Hurdle JG,
    2. O'Neill AJ,
    3. Chopra I,
    4. Lee RE
    . 2011. Targeting bacterial membrane function: an underexploited mechanism for treating persistent infections. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9:62–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Inoue M,
    2. et al
    . 2006. Synergistic effect of polyoxometalates in combination with oxacillin against methicillin-resistant and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a high initial inoculum of 1 × 108 cfu/ml for in vivo test. Biomed. Pharmacother. 60:220–226.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Jorgensen JH,
    2. Turnidge JD,
    3. Washington JA
    . 1999. Antibacterial susceptibility tests: dilution and disk diffusion methods, p 1526–1543. In Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Jorgensen JH, Yolken RH (ed), Manual of clinical microbiology, 7th ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
  20. 20.↵
    1. Klausen M,
    2. et al
    . 2003. Biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa wild type, flagella and type IV pili mutants. Mol. Microbiol. 48:1511–1524.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Kumarasamy KK,
    2. et al
    . 2010. Emergence of a new antibiotic resistance mechanism in India, Pakistan, and the UK: a molecular, biological, and epidemiological study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 10:597–602.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Lambert PA
    . 2005. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics: modified target sites. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 57:1471–1485.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Lamppa JW,
    2. Ackerman ME,
    3. Lai JI,
    4. Scanlon TC,
    5. Griswold KE
    . 2001. Genetically engineered alginate lyase-PEG conjugates exhibit enhanced catalytic function and reduced immunoreactivity. PLoS One 6:e17042. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017042.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    1. Lattner D,
    2. Flemming HC,
    3. Mayer C
    . 2003. C-13-NMR study of the interaction of bacterial alginate with bivalent cations. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 3:81–88.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Mah TF,
    2. et al
    . 2003. A genetic basis for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm antibiotic resistance. Nature 426:306–310.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Maragakis LL,
    2. Perencevich EN,
    3. Cosgrove SE
    . 2008. Clinical and economic burden of antimicrobial resistance. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 6:751–763.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Mark BL,
    2. Vocadlo DJ,
    3. Oliver A
    . 2011. Providing beta-lactams a helping hand: targeting the AmpC beta-lactamase induction pathway. Future Microbiol. 6:1415–1427.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Nehme D,
    2. Poole K
    . 2007. Assembly of the MexAB-OprM multidrug pump of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: component interactions defined by the study of pump mutant suppressors. J. Bacteriol. 189:6118–6127.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Overhage J,
    2. Lewenza S,
    3. Marr AK,
    4. Hancock REW
    . 2007. Identification of genes involved in swarming motility using a Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 Mini-Tn5-lux mutant library. J. Bacteriol. 189:2164–2169.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Rehm BHA
    . 2010. Bacterial polymers: biosynthesis, modifications and applications. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8:578–592.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Schürks N,
    2. Wingender J,
    3. Flemming HC,
    4. Mayer C
    . 2002. Monomer composition and sequence of alginates from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 30:105–111.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Shi XW,
    2. et al
    . 2005. Ionically crosslinked alginate/carboxymethyl chitin beads for oral delivery of protein drugs. Macromol. Biosci. 5:881–889.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Silverman JA,
    2. Mortin LI,
    3. VanPraagh ADG,
    4. LI TC,
    5. Alder J
    . 2005. Inhibition of daptomycin by pulmonary surfactant: in vitro modelling and clinical impact. J. Infect. Dis. 191:2149–2152.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. Wigle TJ,
    2. et al
    . 2009. Inhibitors of RecA activity discovered by high-throughput screening: cell-permeable small molecules attenuate the SOS response in Escherichia coli. J. Biomol. Screen. 14:1092–1101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Yan GL,
    2. Guo YM,
    3. Yuan JM,
    4. Liu D,
    5. Zhang BK
    . 2011. Sodium alginate oligosaccharides from brown algae inhibit Salmonella enteritidis colonization in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 90:1441–1448.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Overcoming Drug Resistance with Alginate Oligosaccharides Able To Potentiate the Action of Selected Antibiotics
Saira Khan, Anne Tøndervik, Håvard Sletta, Geir Klinkenberg, Charlotte Emanuel, Edvar Onsøyen, Rolf Myrvold, Robin A. Howe, Timothy R. Walsh, Katja E. Hill, David W. Thomas
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Sep 2012, 56 (10) 5134-5141; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00525-12

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Overcoming Drug Resistance with Alginate Oligosaccharides Able To Potentiate the Action of Selected Antibiotics
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Overcoming Drug Resistance with Alginate Oligosaccharides Able To Potentiate the Action of Selected Antibiotics
Saira Khan, Anne Tøndervik, Håvard Sletta, Geir Klinkenberg, Charlotte Emanuel, Edvar Onsøyen, Rolf Myrvold, Robin A. Howe, Timothy R. Walsh, Katja E. Hill, David W. Thomas
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Sep 2012, 56 (10) 5134-5141; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00525-12
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596