Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Analytical Procedures

The Composition of the Culture Medium Influences the β-1,3-Glucan Metabolism of Aspergillus fumigatus and the Antifungal Activity of Inhibitors of β-1,3-Glucan Synthesis

Cécile Clavaud, Anne Beauvais, Lise Barbin, Hélène Munier-Lehmann, Jean-Paul Latgé
Cécile Clavaud
aUnité des Aspergillus and Unité de Chimie et Biocatalyse, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Beauvais
aUnité des Aspergillus and Unité de Chimie et Biocatalyse, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lise Barbin
aUnité des Aspergillus and Unité de Chimie et Biocatalyse, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hélène Munier-Lehmann
bCNRS URA 2128, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Paul Latgé
aUnité des Aspergillus and Unité de Chimie et Biocatalyse, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.05661-11
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

In vitro testing of Aspergillus fumigatus susceptibility to echinocandins has always been a challenge. Using a simple and quick colorimetric method to analyze the activity of inhibitors of β-1,3-glucan synthesis, we found that the composition of the culture medium significantly influences glucan synthesis and consequently the antifungal properties of inhibitors of β-1,3-glucan synthesis when they are tested alone or in combination with chitin synthase inhibitors.

TEXT

In vitro susceptibility testing of fungal pathogens is commonly used to evaluate the efficacy of new antifungals but also to test the emergence of antifungal resistance of clinical isolates. In vitro susceptibility of fungal pathogens to chemicals is usually determined by measuring the MIC by using 2-fold microdilution in 96-well plates. The MIC is usually defined as the concentration resulting in the absence of visible growth after 48 h in the presence of the antifungals. This method is based on the recommendation of the CLSI document M38-A (13) or the EUCAST-AFST recommendations (8). However, MIC determination is difficult when one has to test the effect of echinocandins (cell wall β-1,3-glucan synthesis inhibitors) on the growth of filamentous fungi such as Aspergillus fumigatus. In vitro, caspofungin does not cause complete inhibition of the mycelial growth but induces only morphological changes that result in short and branched hyphae (3, 10). The concentration resulting in this type of growth is commonly defined as the minimal effective concentration (MEC). Determination of the MEC is not easy to perform in routine tests, since it has to be validated under a light microscope (3). In addition, the unexplained paradoxical effect seen with echinocandins (increase of drug concentration does not better inhibit mycelial growth) complicates this determination (1, 11).

Better methods are required for estimating the impact of echinocandins on filamentous fungi. Among these, colorimetric methods are an attractive alternative to CLSI or EUCAST-AFST methods. Two main colorimetric methods based on metabolic activity have been proposed to measure MICs of antifungals against A. fumigatus isolates. MTT and XTT methods use tetrazolium salts and menadione as electron coupling agents followed by optical density (OD) measurement (1, 15). In the alamarBlue method, the resazurin colorimetric reagent changes color from deep blue (absorbance maximum at 600 nm) to bright pink (due to the production of resofurin resulting from the reduction of resazurin by electron transfer reactions associated with respiration with an absorbance maximum at 569 nm) when the fungus grows. Resazurin has been used in the past to test the in vitro susceptibility of A. fumigatus to antifungals (7, 17).

Although RPMI medium is recommended by the CLSI for in vitro susceptibility testing, RPMI medium is more suitable for yeast and dimorphic fungi than for A. fumigatus, since the growth of filamentous fungi in RPMI is extremely poor (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). The medium that is recommended by the EUCAST-AFST is very similar (RPMI supplemented with 2% glucose) (8) and did not induce better growth (data not shown). A. fumigatus grew better on protein hydrolysate-based media such as peptone-glucose, peptone-yeast extract-glucose, and 1% yeast extract (YE) than on RPMI-based media (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material; also data not shown). Such protein hydrolysate-based media have been used successfully to test the sensitivity of mutants of A. fumigatus to antifungal drugs but are not used routinely to test drug efficacy (12). Here we present an easy and rapid colorimetric resazurin-based method to calculate MECs of inhibitors of β-1,3-glucan synthesis tested alone and MICs of combinations of drugs inhibiting glucan and chitin synthesis. Changes in the composition of the culture medium induced modifications of the glucan synthase activity and cell wall composition, resulting in changes in the sensitivity of the fungus to the inhibitors of β-1,3-glucan synthesis tested alone and in combination.

Susceptibility testing was undertaken in a 96-well microtiter format with three clinical isolates of A. fumigatus, CBS14489, Af293, and ATCC 46645, the echinocandin-resistant mutant EMFR-S678P (14) (a kind gift from D. Perlin), and its parental strain CBS14489 akuBΔKu80. The method is described in the supplemental material. Antifungal agents tested were micafungin (kindly provided by Astellas), caspofungin, the enfumafungin analog MK3118 (kindly provided by Merck), anidulafungin (Lilly 303366; kindly provided by D. Denning), and nikkomycin (Sigma-Aldrich). Amphotericin B (bioMérieux, Paris, France) was used as a control. Two culture media were used: 1% YE (BD) and RPMI 1640 (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 0.3 g/liter glutamine (buffered to pH 7.0 with 0.165 M morpholinepropanesulfonic acid [MOPS] [Sigma-Aldrich]). Both media were supplemented with 0.1% Tween 20. MECs measured using resazurin conversion were defined for all echinocandins as the lowest drug concentration giving the maximal fungistatic transient growth inhibition, whereas MICs were based exclusively on fungicidal effect. For the Etest, strips with concentration gradients from 0.004 to 32 mg/liter of caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin, and amphotericin B were used in 1% yeast extract agar plates as recommended by the manufacturer (bioMérieux, Lyon, France). Glucan synthase activity was measured in membrane extracts by the quantification of the incorporation of radiolabeled UDP-[U-14C]glucose into β-1,3-glucan as described in reference 4. Carbohydrate composition of the cell wall was determined as described in reference 12. A two-dimensional colorimetric checkerboard assay using resazurin is described in the supplemental material. Often used to estimate the combinatorial effects of drugs, fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC), defined as the MIC of drug A in the presence of drug B divided by the MIC of drug A alone (6) cannot be calculated properly in the case of echinocandins because only MECs can be identified when echinocandins are tested alone, whereas true MICs are seen when the combinations are tested.

MECs of A fumigatus strains obtained with echinocandins were lower in 1% YE than in RPMI (Table 1). This result was verified using different strains as well as different batches of yeast extract (Table 1; also data not shown). Although MECs were lower in 1% YE, the residual growth was higher in this medium than in RPMI (Fig. 1). This increased sensitivity in the YE medium also occurred with enfumafungin (Table 1; also, see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Light microscopy confirmed that the concentration of echinocandin inducing a change of slope in OD values in Fig. 1 truly represented the MEC, as confirmed by the hyperbranching phenotype of the mycelium. Strain EMRF-S678P, the fks1(S678P) mutant strain of Ku80, was resistant to echinocandin in both media. It was sensitive to amphotericin B (MIC = 1.0 to 7.7 μg/ml obtained by Etest) and, interestingly, to enfumafungin (which also targets β-1,3-glucan synthase inhibition) in 1% YE but not in RPMI. Echinocandin MICs estimated by Etest assays were similar to the MECs calculated from the liquid resazurin test in a 96-well format. The effect of the medium composition on the fungistatic and fungicidal activity of polyenes and azoles against A. fumigatus had been demonstrated (16), but the effect had not been studied with echinocandins.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Inhibitory effect of β-1,3-glucan synthase inhibitors on the mycelial growth of clinical isolates and mutant strains of A. fumigatus grown in RPMI and 1% yeast extract

Fig 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1

Growth of A. fumigatus CBS14489 akuBΔKu80 and EMFR-S678P in the presence of increasing concentrations of caspofungin. Mycelial growth is estimated from OD readings with the resazurin method after 24 h of growth in 1% yeast extract or after 48 h of growth in RPMI.

The effect of caspofungin and nikkomycin Z combinations was tested under the same culture conditions, since a synergistic effect of these drugs was previously reported (9). The combined effect of caspofungin with nikkomycin Z was measured by the resazurin checkerboard broth microdilution assay (Fig. 2). In spite of a lower sensitivity to drugs of the fungus grown in RPMI, the combinations of caspofungin and nikkomycin were more efficient in this medium than in the YE medium. In addition, when the microtiter plates containing RPMI-based medium were incubated for an additional 24 h at 37°C, there was no change in the OD after 48 h in the wells with a blue color (corresponding to a 100% inhibition [Fig. 2]). In addition, no germination of the conidia (estimated by light microscopy or CFU counts) was seen when the conidia of these wells were inoculated into fresh liquid or agar-based culture medium. These data confirmed that the fungus in the wells showing no change in OD compared to the control wells without fungus was killed by the caspofungin-nikkomycin Z drug combinations, whereas these drugs alone did not kill the fungus in RPMI. In contrast, in 1% yeast extract-based medium, all wells that were negative after the first 24 h (blue color) became positive (pink color) after an additional 24 h of incubation. These results showed that combinations of nikkomycin and caspofungin were fungicidal in RPMI, while in YE they were only fungistatic.

Fig 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2

Checkerboard assays. (a) Effect of various concentrations of caspofungin, enfumafungin, and micafungin in combination with various concentrations of nikkomycin Z on the growth of A. fumigatus CBS 144-89 in RPMI (A) (48 h growth) and in 1% YE (B) (24 h growth). Note that in the data obtained with RPMI, all the combinations indexed with black squares correspond to drug combinations that kill the fungus, whereas in the data for 1% YE, none of the combinations tested killed the fungus. (b) Effect of various concentrations of caspofungin in combination with various concentrations of nikkomycin Z on the growth of A. fumigatus Af293 and ATCC 46645 and the caspofungin-resistant strain EMFRS678P in RPMI (A) and on Af293 and ATCC 46645 in 1% YE (B). Conditions for estimating mycelial growth are the same as for Fig. 1.

To investigate the reasons for these differences in drug sensitivity, the cell wall composition and the β-1,3-glucan synthase activity were monitored. First, there was a significant (30%) reduction in the β-1,3-glucan content of the cell wall of wild-type strain CBS14489 cultivated in 1% yeast extract compared to RPMI medium (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). This reduction in the β-1,3-glucan content was also concomitant with a 3-fold reduction in α-1,3-glucan and a 4-fold increase in chitin levels. Second, the specific glucan synthase activity was lower (P < 0.01, two-way analysis of variance [ANOVA] with Student's t test) in 1% yeast extract compared to RPMI (see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material). The reduction in β-1,3-glucan synthase activity and the small amount of β-1,3-glucan in the cell wall logically explained the increased sensitivity of A. fumigatus to the echinocandins in the 1% YE medium (5). Similarly, the fungicidal effect of the caspofungin-nikkomycin combination in RPMI may be due to a lower chitin content seen in the cell wall of the mycelium grown in this medium. Alternatively, two mechanisms may govern the echinocandin effect: an immediate fungistatic growth inhibition due to the noncompetitive inhibition of target 1 seen in both culture media and a fungicidal effect due to the inhibition of target 2 that is revealed only after the addition of nikkomycin. The resazurin method that has been used in the past and was modified here is simple, can be used with all antifungals as demonstrated here with echinocandins and amphotericin B (but also azoles [data not shown]), and should be reintroduced for routine testing. Also, microscopic observations to confirm the effect of echinocandins are not required. The method is easy to perform and can be used for high-throughput screening to test libraries of chemical compounds or to monitor the appearance of clinical strains resistant to echinocandins.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was partly supported by an Institut Carnot Pasteur Maladies Infectieuses grant (FUNGI), an education grant from Merck (1007005/00), and the Era-Pathogenomic grant Antifun.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 2 September 2011.
    • Returned for modification 8 November 2011.
    • Accepted 19 February 2012.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 5 March 2012.
  • Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.05661-11.

  • Copyright © 2012, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Antachopoulos C,
    2. Meletiadis J,
    3. Sein T,
    4. Roilides E,
    5. Walsh TJ
    . 2007. Concentration-dependent effects of caspofungin on the metabolic activity of Aspergillus species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:881–887.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.
    1. Antachopoulos C,
    2. Meletiadis J,
    3. Sein T,
    4. Roilides E,
    5. Walsh TJ
    . 2008. Comparative in vitro pharmacodynamics of caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin against germinated and nongerminated Aspergillus conidia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:321–328.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Arikan S,
    2. Lozano-Chiu M,
    3. Paetznick V,
    4. Rex JH
    . 2001. In vitro susceptibility testing methods for caspofungin against Aspergillus and Fusarium isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:327–330.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Beauvais A,
    2. Drake R,
    3. Ng K,
    4. Diaquin M,
    5. Latge JP
    . 1993. Characterization of the 1,3-beta-glucan synthase of Aspergillus fumigatus. J. Gen. Microbiol. 139:3071–3078.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Beauvais A,
    2. et al
    . 2005. Two alpha(1–3) glucan synthases with different functions in Aspergillus fumigatus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:1531–1538.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ben-Ami R,
    2. Lewis RE,
    3. Kontoyiannis DP
    . 2011. In vitro interactions among echinocandins against Aspergillus fumigatus: lack of concordance among methods. Med. Mycol. 49:285–288.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Bowman JC,
    2. et al
    . 2002. The antifungal echinocandin caspofungin acetate kills growing cells of Aspergillus fumigatus in vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:3001–3012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Chryssanthou EM,
    2. Cuenca-Estrella M
    . 2006. Comparison of the EUCAST-AFST broth dilution method with the CLSI reference broth dilution method (M38-A) for susceptibility testing of posaconazole and voriconazole against Aspergillus spp. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 12:901–904.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Fortwendel JR,
    2. et al
    . 2009. Differential effects of inhibiting chitin and 1,3-β-d-glucan synthesis in Ras and calcineurin mutants of Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:476–482.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Kurtz MB,
    2. et al
    . 1994. Morphological effects of lipopeptides against Aspergillus fumigatus correlate with activities against (1,3)-β-d-glucan synthase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:1480–1489.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Lewis RE,
    2. Albert ND,
    3. Kontoyiannis DP
    . 2008. Comparison of the dose-dependent activity and paradoxical effect of caspofungin and micafungin in a neutropenic murine model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 61:1140–1144.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Mouyna I,
    2. et al
    . 2010. Members of protein O-mannosyltransferase family in Aspergillus fumigatus differentially affect growth, morphogenesis and viability. Mol. Microbiol. 76:1205–1221.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2002. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi. Approved standard M38-A. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA.
  14. 14.↵
    1. Rocha EM,
    2. Garcia-Effron G,
    3. Park S,
    4. Perlin DS
    . 2007. A Ser678Pro substitution in Fks1p confers resistance to echinocandin drugs in Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:4174–4176.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Te Dorsthorst DT,
    2. Zwaaftink RB,
    3. Rijs AJ,
    4. Meletiadis J,
    5. Verweij PE
    . 2007. A colorimetric and spectrophotometric method for in vitro susceptibility testing of Aspergillus species against caspofungin. Med. Mycol. 45:351–355.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Tortorano AM,
    2. et al
    . 2002. Effect of medium composition on static and cidal activity of amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole and terbinafine against Aspergillus fumigatus: a multicenter study. J. Chemother. 14:246–252.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Yamaguchi H,
    2. Uchida K,
    3. Nagino K,
    4. Matsunaga T
    . 2002. Usefulness of a colorimetric method for testing antifungal drug susceptibilities of Aspergillus species to voriconazole. J. Infect. Chemother. 8:374–377.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
The Composition of the Culture Medium Influences the β-1,3-Glucan Metabolism of Aspergillus fumigatus and the Antifungal Activity of Inhibitors of β-1,3-Glucan Synthesis
Cécile Clavaud, Anne Beauvais, Lise Barbin, Hélène Munier-Lehmann, Jean-Paul Latgé
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy May 2012, 56 (6) 3428-3431; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.05661-11

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Composition of the Culture Medium Influences the β-1,3-Glucan Metabolism of Aspergillus fumigatus and the Antifungal Activity of Inhibitors of β-1,3-Glucan Synthesis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The Composition of the Culture Medium Influences the β-1,3-Glucan Metabolism of Aspergillus fumigatus and the Antifungal Activity of Inhibitors of β-1,3-Glucan Synthesis
Cécile Clavaud, Anne Beauvais, Lise Barbin, Hélène Munier-Lehmann, Jean-Paul Latgé
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy May 2012, 56 (6) 3428-3431; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.05661-11
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • TEXT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596