Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Susceptibility

Enfumafungin Derivative MK-3118 Shows Increased In Vitro Potency against Clinical Echinocandin-Resistant Candida Species and Aspergillus Species Isolates

Cristina Jiménez-Ortigosa, Padmaja Paderu, Mary R. Motyl, David S. Perlin
Cristina Jiménez-Ortigosa
aPublic Health Research Institute, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Padmaja Paderu
aPublic Health Research Institute, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary R. Motyl
bMerck, Sharp & Dohme Corp., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David S. Perlin
aPublic Health Research Institute, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02145-13
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

MK-3118 is as an orally active new antifungal in the early stage of clinical development that inhibits the biosynthesis of β-(1,3)-glucan. We evaluated the in vitro activity of this compound against wild-type and echinocandin-resistant (ER) isolates containing mutations in the FKS gene(s) of Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. MK-3118 demonstrated enhanced efficacy for most C. albicans and C. glabrata ER isolates relative to caspofungin, with decreased MICs and half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50s).

TEXT

The echinocandins are first-line agents for treating severe invasive fungal infections (IFIs) (1), being fungicidal against yeast and fungistatic against molds. They alter the integrity of the fungal cell wall via the inhibition of the synthesis of the β-(1,3)-glucan, its major component (2). Specifically, echinocandins target the catalytic subunit of the enzymatic complex β-(1,3)-glucan synthase, encoded by the FKS genes. Reduced susceptibility to echinocandins is associated with mutations in two specific regions in the FKS genes known as hot spots (HS) 1 and 2 that lead to clinical failure or poor response to the therapy (3). The three echinocandins approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of IFIs (caspofungin, anidulafungin, and micafungin) are available only in intravenous formulation, which limits their use in the treatment of less-severe infections or as oral step-down agents. Enfumafungin is one among several new fungal triterpenoid glycosides isolated from the fermentation of Hormonema sp. (4) that present potent in vitro antifungal activity by inhibiting the β-(1,3)-glucan synthase (5). Recently, a semisynthetic derivative of enfumafungin, MK-3118 (Fig. 1), which is being evaluated as an oral therapy for fungal infections, was described (6). This new compound showed MIC values of ≤1 μg/ml and ≤0.015 μg/ml against 160 strains of 7 Candida spp. and 40 Aspergillus spp., respectively (7). Moreover, MK-3118 showed promising in vivo efficacy in murine models of candidiasis and aspergillosis (7, 8). To better understand the antifungal efficacy of MK-3118, we evaluated this new compound against a well-characterized panel of echinocandin-resistant (ER) fks mutants derived from patients who failed echinocandin therapy.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Structures of enfumafungin and MK-3118, a semisynthetic enfumafungin derivative.

Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed in triplicate for a collection of 95 Candida strains (20 C. albicans, 20 C. glabrata, 2 C. dubliniensis, 15 C. krusei, 19 C. parapsilosis, and 19 C. tropicalis) that included 30 isolates showing an echinocandin resistance (ER) phenotype (caspofungin [CAS] MIC ≥ 0.5 μg/ml) and for a panel of 40 Aspergillus strains (14 A. fumigatus, 10 A. flavus, 10 A. niger, and 6 A. terreus) that included 1 isolate showing an ER phenotype (9) in accordance with the guidelines described in CLSI documents M27-A3 and M38-A2 (10, 11). In the case of the Candida isolates, MICs were also determined in the presence of 50% human serum (Sigma-Aldrich) (from human male blood, type AB) or mouse serum (Millipore) for C. glabrata isolates. C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and C. krusei ATCC 6258 were used as quality control strains. Caspofungin and MK-3118 were obtained as standard powders from their manufacturer (Merck & Co. Inc., Rahway, NJ), and stock solutions were prepared by dissolving the compounds in water or 100% dimethyl sulfoxide (MK-3118).

The MIC distributions of the Candida isolates after 48 h of growth at 35°C for CAS and MK-3118 are shown in Table 1. MK-3118 did not show significant differences in MIC values for the wild-type (WT) isolate population, although overall it presented enhanced in vitro efficacy compared to that of CAS for nearly all echinocandin-resistant isolates, especially among the C. albicans and C. glabrata isolates, where the MIC values decreased by 1- to 8-fold and 4- to 32-fold, respectively. C. tropicalis isolates showed a 4-fold decrease in MIC, while the fold change for C. krusei ER isolates was 2 to 4 times lower. Specifically, 50% of the ER isolates of C. albicans showed MIC values for CAS of ≥2 mg/liter whereas 70% of the ER isolates showed an MIC value of ≤0.5 mg/liter for MK-3118 after 48 h of growth (4- to 8-fold change). Moreover, only 30% of the ER strains showed MIC values of ≤0.25 mg/liter for CAS, while 60% were below this level for MK-3118. The decrease in the MIC values was genotype dependent. Thus, prominent mutations conferring modification of Ser 645 within hot spot (HS) 1 of Fks1p for C. albicans showed a 4- to 16-fold reduction in MIC values whereas strains containing modifications at Phe 641 showed results for CAS and MK-3118 that were similar. In addition, 64% of C. glabrata ER strains showed MIC values of ≤0.5 mg/liter for MK-3118 after 48 h of growth whereas all ER isolates showed MIC values of ≥1 mg/liter for CAS. The decrease in the MIC values was not genotype dependent in C. glabrata, as mutations in either the FKS1 gene or the FKS2 gene showed comparable results (8- to 32-fold reduction in both cases) (Table 2). Similar results were described by Pfaller and collaborators (12), who found that, in a cohort of wild-type clinical isolates (without FKS mutations), there was little or no difference in MIC values between MK-3118 and CAS by broth microdilution for C. albicans, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis. The only exception was C. glabrata, where MK-3118 was 8-fold more potent than CAS. Moreover, 71% of clinical isolates harboring mutations in the FKS gene(s) were inhibited by MK-3118 at ≤1 mg/liter (12), which correlates well with our data.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

MIC distributions of CAS and MK-3118 in the presence or absence of serum for the Candida isolates included in this study

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

MIC distributions of CAS and MK-3118 for the C. albicans and C. glabrata isolates harboring mutations in the FKS genes included in this study

The echinocandins are highly bound to serum proteins, with a rate of 98% reported for caspofungin (13), which alters its antifungal properties. In fact, it has been reported that the addition of 50% of human serum increased caspofungin MICs an average of 2-fold with a range of 1- to 16-fold (14). In order to ascertain if the relative in vitro potency of MK-3118 was affected by serum, 50% (wt/vol) human serum was added to the MIC plates, as previously described (13). In the case of C. glabrata isolates, 50% mouse serum was used because human serum can inhibit the growth of this organism (15). The addition of serum to the plates increased the MIC of MK-3118 an average of 16-fold with a range of 8- to 64-fold, four times higher than the values obtained for CAS (Table 1). The reduced antifungal properties of this compound in the presence of serum suggested that protein binding was having a direct effect on the drug, perhaps by altering its ability to inhibit glucan synthase, as was observed previously for the echinocandins (14, 16).

Abnormal growth morphology was used to establish a minimum effective concentration (MEC) for Aspergillus spp. after 24 h and 48 h of growth at 35°C. MK-3118 and caspofungin were quite active against the four species of filamentous fungi analyzed, including eight A. fumigatus strains with an azole-resistant phenotype. Interestingly, the growth of all Aspergillus isolates was completely inhibited by treatment with high concentrations (8 to 16 μg/ml) of MK-3118. These data are in accord with those of Pfaller et al. (17), who showed that MK-3118 was active against 71 Aspergillus isolates, including 8 itraconazole-resistant isolates (MIC ≥ 4 μg/ml). Since echinocandin-resistant isolates from Aspergillus spp. have rarely been observed, MK-3118 was tested against the only ER strain of A. fumigatus available to date, which presents the amino acid substitution S678P, equivalent to that of the S654P of C. albicans (9). In this isolate, MK-3118 showed prominent increased potency with an MIC that was 133 times less than that of CAS after 24 h of growth (Table 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

MEC distributions of CAS and MK-3118 for the Aspergillus isolates included in this study

To better assess direct inhibition of MK-3118 on glucan synthase, the kinetic inhibition parameter IC50 (half-maximal inhibitory concentration) was determined for glucan synthases from wild-type and fks-containing strains. Product-entrapped 1,3-β-d-glucan synthase complexes (GS) were extracted from wild-type and ER strains containing fks mutations from C. albicans (1 WT and 3 fks mutant strains), C. glabrata (1 WT and 2 fks mutant strains), and A. fumigatus (1 WT strain and 1 fks mutant strain), as described previously (18, 19). As expected, evaluation of kinetic inhibition of product-entrapped enzymes isolated from ER strains yielded lower IC50s for MK-3118 than for CAS in Candida albicans (3- to 5.5-fold) and Candida glabrata (3.5- to 62-fold) (Fig. 2A and Table 4). An exception was observed for glucan synthase harboring the mutation F641S, as inhibition of GS activity did not exhibit any variation in the percentage of incorporation even after exposure to high doses of the drugs (10 μg/ml); it was not possible to obtain an in-range IC50 for MK-3118 (Fig. 2A). In the case of A. fumigatus, a decrease of 28-fold was detected in the IC50 of a prominent ER strain (Fks1p-S678P) compared to that of the WT for MK-3118 (Fig. 2B and Table 4), indicating a potential advantage of MK-3118 over echinocandin drugs for certain echinocandin-resistant strains.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Antifungal inhibition profiles for product-entrapped 1,3-β-glucan synthase enzyme complexes (GS) for caspofungin (CAS) and MK-3118 for wild-type and ER clinical isolates. GS inhibition was assessed by the incorporation of [3H]glucose into radiolabeled product. (A) Candida albicans. (B) Aspergillus fumigatus.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4

In vitro whole-cell susceptibility and 1,3-β-glucan synthase inhibition profiles of caspofungin and MK-3118 for representative strains included in the studya

In summary, MK-3118 was highly active on most fks-mediated echinocandin-resistant strains, especially those from C. albicans and C. glabrata. It was also active on Aspergillus spp. at high concentrations of the drug and was active against a highly ER strain. As observed previously with echinocandin drugs, serum shifted the relative efficacy of the new compound MK-3118, which was most effective against echinocandin-resistant strains.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by a grant from Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp. to D.S.P.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 1 October 2013.
    • Returned for modification 17 October 2013.
    • Accepted 1 December 2013.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 9 December 2013.
  • Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Pappas PG,
    2. Kauffman CA,
    3. Andes D,
    4. Benjamin DK Jr,
    5. Calandra TF,
    6. Edwards JE Jr,
    7. Filler SG,
    8. Fisher JF,
    9. Kullberg BJ,
    10. Ostrosky-Zeichner L,
    11. Reboli AC,
    12. Rex JH,
    13. Walsh TJ,
    14. Sobel JD; Infectious Diseases Society of America
    . 2009. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 48:503–535. doi:10.1086/596757.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Denning DW
    . 2003. Echinocandin antifungal drugs. Lancet 362:1142–1151. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14472-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Perlin DS
    . 2007. Resistance to echinocandin-class antifungal drugs. Drug Resist. Updat. 10:121–130. doi:10.1016/j.drup.2007.04.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Onishi J,
    2. Meinz M,
    3. Thompson J,
    4. Curotto J,
    5. Dreikorn S,
    6. Rosenbach M,
    7. Douglas C,
    8. Abruzzo G,
    9. Flattery A,
    10. Kong L,
    11. Cabello A,
    12. Vicente F,
    13. Pelaez F,
    14. Diez MT,
    15. Martin I,
    16. Bills G,
    17. Giacobbe R,
    18. Dombrowski A,
    19. Schwartz R,
    20. Morris S,
    21. Harris G,
    22. Tsipouras A,
    23. Wilson K,
    24. Kurtz MB
    . 2000. Discovery of novel antifungal (1,3)-beta-D-glucan synthase inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:368–377. doi:10.1128/AAC.44.2.368-377.2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Peel M,
    2. Fan W,
    3. Mamai A,
    4. Hong J,
    5. Orr M,
    6. Ouvry G,
    7. Perrey D,
    8. Liu H,
    9. Jones M,
    10. Nelson K,
    11. Ogbu C,
    12. Lee S,
    13. Li K,
    14. Kirwan R,
    15. Noe A,
    16. Sligar J,
    17. Martensen P,
    18. Balkove J,
    19. Greenlee CM,
    20. Meng D,
    21. Parker D,
    22. Wildonger K,
    23. Liberator P,
    24. Abruzzo G,
    25. Flattery A,
    26. Galgoci A,
    27. Giacobbe R,
    28. Gill C,
    29. Hsu MJ,
    30. Misura A,
    31. Nielsen J,
    32. Powles M,
    33. Racine F,
    34. Dragovic J,
    35. Habulihaz B,
    36. Balkovec J
    . 2010. Enfumafungin derivatives: orally active glucan synthase inhibitors, abstr F1-845. Abstr. Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., Boston, MA.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Motyl MR,
    2. Tan C,
    3. Liberator P,
    4. Giacobbe R,
    5. Racine F,
    6. Hsu MJ,
    7. Nielsen-Kahn,
    8. Bowman JJ,
    9. Douglas C,
    10. Hammond M,
    11. Balkovec JM,
    12. Greenlee ML,
    13. Meng D,
    14. Parker D,
    15. Peel M,
    16. Fan W,
    17. Mamai A,
    18. Hong J,
    19. Orr M,
    20. Ouvry G,
    21. Perrey D,
    22. Liu H,
    23. Jones M,
    24. Nelson K,
    25. Ogbu C,
    26. Lee S,
    27. Li K,
    28. Kirwan R,
    29. Noe A,
    30. Sligar J,
    31. Martensen P
    . 2010. Abstr. Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., Boston, MA, abstr F1-847.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Flattery A,
    2. Abruzzo G,
    3. Gill C,
    4. Powles M,
    5. Misura A,
    6. Galgoci A,
    7. Colwell L,
    8. Dragovic J,
    9. Tong X,
    10. Wolff M,
    11. Liberator P
    . 2010. Abstr. Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., Boston, MA, abstr F1-848.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Flattery A,
    2. Abruzzo G,
    3. Gill C,
    4. Powles M,
    5. Misura A,
    6. Galgoci A,
    7. Douglas C,
    8. Hawkins J,
    9. Galuska S,
    10. Pereira T,
    11. Tong S,
    12. Wolff M,
    13. Song Q,
    14. Liberator P
    . 2010. Abstr. Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., Boston, MA, abstr F1-849.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Rocha EM,
    2. Garcia-Effron G,
    3. Park S,
    4. Perlin DS
    . 2007. A Ser678Pro substitution in Fks1p confers resistance to echinocandin drugs in Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:4174–4176. doi:10.1128/AAC.00917-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2008. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; approved standard. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute document M27-A3, 3rd ed, vol 28. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA.
  11. 11.↵
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2008. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi; approved standard. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute document M38-A2, 2nd ed, vol 28. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA.
  12. 12.↵
    1. Pfaller MA,
    2. Messer SA,
    3. Motyl MR,
    4. Jones RN,
    5. Castanheira M
    . 2013. Activity of MK-3118, a new oral glucan synthase inhibitor, tested against Candida spp. by two international methods (CLSI and EUCAST). J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 68:858–863. doi:10.1093/jac/dks466.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Hajdu R,
    2. Thompson R,
    3. Sundelof JG,
    4. Pelak BA,
    5. Bouffard FA,
    6. Dropinski JF,
    7. Kropp H
    . 1997. Preliminary animal pharmacokinetics of the parenteral antifungal agent MK-0991 (L-743,872). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:2339–2344.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Paderu P,
    2. Garcia-Effron G,
    3. Balashov S,
    4. Delmas G,
    5. Park S,
    6. Perlin DS
    . 2007. Serum differentially alters the antifungal properties of echinocandin drugs. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:2253–2256. doi:10.1128/AAC.01536-06.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Garcia-Effron G,
    2. Park S,
    3. Perlin DS
    . 2011. Improved detection of Candida sp. fks hot spot mutants by using the method of the CLSI M27-A3 document with the addition of bovine serum albumin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55:2245–2255. doi:10.1128/AAC.01350-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Odabasi Z,
    2. Paetznick V,
    3. Rex JH,
    4. Ostrosky-Zeichner L
    . 2007. Effects of serum on in vitro susceptibility testing of echinocandins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:4214–4216. doi:10.1128/AAC.01589-06.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Pfaller MA,
    2. Messer SA,
    3. Motyl MR,
    4. Jones RN,
    5. Castanheira M
    . 2013. In vitro activitity of a new oral glucan synthase inhibitor (MK-3118) tested against Aspergillus spp. by CLSI and EUCAST broth microdilution methods. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57:1065–1068. doi:10.1128/AAC.01588-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Garcia-Effron G,
    2. Lee S,
    3. Park S,
    4. Cleary JD,
    5. Perlin DS
    . 2009. Effect of Candida glabrata FKS1 and FKS2 mutations on echinocandin sensitivity and kinetics of 1,3-beta-D-glucan synthase: implication for the existing susceptibility breakpoint. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:3690–3699. doi:10.1128/AAC.00443-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Garcia-Effron G,
    2. Park S,
    3. Perlin DS
    . 2009. Correlating echinocandin MIC and kinetic inhibition of fks1 mutant glucan synthases for Candida albicans: implications for interpretive breakpoints. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:112–122. doi:10.1128/AAC.01162-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Enfumafungin Derivative MK-3118 Shows Increased In Vitro Potency against Clinical Echinocandin-Resistant Candida Species and Aspergillus Species Isolates
Cristina Jiménez-Ortigosa, Padmaja Paderu, Mary R. Motyl, David S. Perlin
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jan 2014, 58 (2) 1248-1251; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02145-13

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Enfumafungin Derivative MK-3118 Shows Increased In Vitro Potency against Clinical Echinocandin-Resistant Candida Species and Aspergillus Species Isolates
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Enfumafungin Derivative MK-3118 Shows Increased In Vitro Potency against Clinical Echinocandin-Resistant Candida Species and Aspergillus Species Isolates
Cristina Jiménez-Ortigosa, Padmaja Paderu, Mary R. Motyl, David S. Perlin
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jan 2014, 58 (2) 1248-1251; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02145-13
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • TEXT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596