Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mechanisms of Action: Physiological Effects

Antibiotic Streptolydigin Requires Noncatalytic Mg2+ for Binding to RNA Polymerase

Savva Zorov, Yulia Yuzenkova, Vadim Nikiforov, Konstantin Severinov, Nikolay Zenkin
Savva Zorov
aCentre for Bacterial Cell Biology, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
bWaksman Institute, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
cFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yulia Yuzenkova
aCentre for Bacterial Cell Biology, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vadim Nikiforov
dPublic Health Research Institute Center, New Jersey Medical School at UMDNJ, Newark, New Jersey, USA
fSt. Petersburg State Polytechnical University, St. Petersburg, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Konstantin Severinov
bWaksman Institute, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
eSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Skolkovo, Russia
fSt. Petersburg State Polytechnical University, St. Petersburg, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nikolay Zenkin
aCentre for Bacterial Cell Biology, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02248-13
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Multisubunit RNA polymerase, an enzyme that accomplishes transcription in all living organisms, is a potent target for antibiotics. The antibiotic streptolydigin inhibits RNA polymerase by sequestering the active center in a catalytically inactive conformation. Here, we show that binding of streptolydigin to RNA polymerase strictly depends on a noncatalytic magnesium ion which is likely chelated by the aspartate of the bridge helix of the active center. Substitutions of this aspartate may explain different sensitivities of bacterial RNA polymerases to streptolydigin. These results provide the first evidence for the role of noncatalytic magnesium ions in the functioning of RNA polymerase and suggest new routes for the modification of existing and the design of new inhibitors of transcription.

INTRODUCTION

DNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RNAP) is a potent target for antibiotics. At present, two specific inhibitors of bacterial RNAPs, rifampin and lipiarmycin (fidaxomicin), are in clinical use as antibiotics, and there is still great potential for other known inhibitors of bacterial RNAPs (or their derivatives) to be used in the clinic in the future.

The antibiotic streptolydigin (Stl) is a derivative of 3-acetyltetramic acid (Fig. 1A), and it has been known for a long time to specifically inhibit bacterial RNAPs (1–3). Stl does not inhibit eukaryotic RNAPs, although their structural similarity with bacterial RNAPs is high (4–6). Stl demonstrates only partial cross-resistance with the antibiotic rifampin, which is in wide clinical use (7), and some other known inhibitors of bacterial RNAPs, such as microcin J25 (8–10), CBR703 (11), and sorangicin (12). Besides being of interest for drug development, Stl as an inhibitor of the RNAP active center (below) is useful for a fundamental understanding of the catalytic mechanisms of transcription.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Inhibition of elongation and intrinsic cleavage of RNA by Stl. (A) Chemical structure of Stl. (B) Close-up view of Stl bound in the active center in the crystal structure of the T. thermophilus RNAP elongation complex (Protein Data Bank [PDB] code 2PPB). The β subunit was removed for clarity. The amino acids of the TL (orange), mutated in this study, are shown as orange sticks. (C and D) Schemes of the elongation complexes (EC1 and EC2) used and representative phosphorimaging scans of the products of the reactions separated in denaturing polyacrylamide gels are shown above the plots. T, template strands; NT, nontemplate strands. RNA (red) was radiolabeled at the 5′ end. (C) Kinetics of GTP incorporation (1 mM GTP and 10 mM Mg2+) in EC1 in the presence of different concentrations of Stl. (D) Kinetics of intrinsic (endonucleolytic) cleavage (10 mM MgCl2) in EC2 in the presence of different concentrations of Stl. Note that the addition of nonsaturating Stl before the reactants results in two fractions (fast and slow) of the elongation complexes. (E to G). Kinetics of NMP incorporation in the presence of different concentrations of Stl, preincubated with or without Mg2+, were fitted in a single-exponent equation. Note the clearly double exponential nature of the kinetics data in panel E.

The crystal structures of Stl complexed with the Thermus thermophilus core RNAP (13, 14) and the T. thermophilus elongation complex (15) revealed that the antibiotic binds along the bridge helix (BH) about 20 Å away from the catalytic Mg2+ ions of the active center (Fig. 1B), which participate in catalysis of all the reactions performed by the RNAPs (16, 17). Structural and biochemical analyses showed that Stl freezes the unfolded conformation of a flexible domain of the active center, the trigger loop (TL) (Fig. 1B). The TL was later shown to be essential for catalysis of all reactions by the active center (18–20), explaining the ability of Stl to inhibit all RNAP catalytic activities (13).

The two largest subunits, β and β′, are involved in the binding of Stl (13, 21–24). The binding site is formed on the “DNA side” of the bridge helix (Fig. 1B); the streptolol moiety of Stl interacts with regions STL1 (positions 538 to 552 of the second-largest subunit; β538–552 [Escherichia coli numbering]) and STL2 (β557–576) and the N-terminal portion of the BH (β′769–788) (13), while the tetramic acid groups interact with the central portion of the BH (β′789–795) and with the ordered segment of the TL (13). The acetamide group of the tetramic acid moiety of Stl and β′D792 of the BH are critical for Stl binding (13, 24). Here we provide evidence that the binding of Stl to RNAP strictly requires a noncatalytic Mg2+ ion, which apparently bridges the Stl tetramic acid moiety to β′D792 of the BH. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first direct evidence for the role of noncatalytic Mg2+ ions in RNAP functioning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

WT and mutant RNAPs.Recombinant wild-type (WT) and mutant Thermus aquaticus core RNAPs were constructed and purified as described previously (25).

Transcription essays.Elongation complexes (ECs) were assembled with WT and mutant (H936A/R933A and M932A [E. coli numbering]) RNAPs as described previously (18) and placed in transcription buffer containing 40 mM KCl and 20 mM Tris (pH 7.9). Prior to complex assembly, RNA was 32P labeled at the 5′ end by using [γ-32P]ATP (PerkinElmer). All reactions were carried out at 40°C. Stl (Sigma) with or without 10 mM MgCl2 was added before the reactions for 10 min at 40°C. Elongation reactions were initiated by addition of 1 mM GTP or 1 mM GTP with 10 mM MgCl2; endonucleolytic cleavage reactions were initiated by the addition of 10 mM MgCl2. Reactions were stopped by the addition of formamide-containing buffer, and products were analyzed as described previously (18). Fast kinetics experiments were performed as described previously (18). The kinetics data that were described well by a single exponent were fitted into a single-exponent equation using the nonlinear regression procedure in SigmaPlot software. Plots were normalized to the predicted maximum, which was taken as 100. The rates were then fitted in a hyperbolic equation to determine the Ki[Stl]. When the kinetics was described by a double exponent, the predicted maxima of the fast fractions were used for the fit to determine the Stl concentration that inhibited half of the complexes (equivalent of the Ki).

Mg2+ binding to Stl.The spectra of Stl were recorded using a UV160U UV-visible (UV-Vis) recording spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc.) in a fused silica measuring cell in the presence of the indicated concentrations of the MgCl2 in 20 mM HEPES buffer (pH 8.0).

RESULTS

In order to investigate the details of the effects of Stl on RNAP active center functioning, we used artificially assembled elongation complexes (ECs). These complexes are assembled with Thermus aquaticus RNAP, fully complementary synthetic template and nontemplate DNA oligonucleotides, and an RNA oligonucleotide (Fig. 1C and D). The complexes are indistinguishable from “native” elongation complexes obtained by transcription from a promoter (19, 26, 27). We analyzed the kinetics of nucleoside monophosphate (NMP) addition in the presence of different concentrations of Stl in the elongation complex EC1, containing a 13-nucleotide-long RNA (Fig. 1C). Note that Stl was preincubated with the EC for 10 min before the addition of nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) with Mg2+, which initiated synthesis. Curiously, at lower concentrations of Stl, we observed a clear separation of the kinetics curve into two phases, fast and slow (Fig. 1C and E, the latter as an example of the fit of the data into a single-exponent equation). At higher concentrations, the division was less obvious, and the kinetics can be described by a single-exponent equation (Fig. 1F).

Next, we tested the effects of increasing concentrations of Stl on the hydrolysis of the phosphodiester bond, a reaction also catalyzed by the RNAP active center. As seen from Fig. 1D, Stl also divided the ECs into sensitive (slow) and resistant (fast) fractions. Interestingly, however, the concentration of Stl required to inhibit half of the ECs (the inhibition constant Ki cannot be used in this case, given that the kinetics cannot be described by a single-exponent equation) during hydrolysis was ∼8 times lower than that during NTP addition (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Correlation of the rate of the reaction and efficiency of inhibition by Stl preincubated with or without Mg2+

The rate of phosphodiester bond hydrolysis is much lower than that of NMP incorporation (Table 1). We hypothesized that, upon the start of the reaction by addition of reactants, Stl requires time to manifest its inhibitory activity (note that complexes were preincubated with Stl before the start of the reaction), which would explain the more successful inhibition of the slower reaction of hydrolysis by Stl. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the inhibition of RNA extension by mutant RNAPs (β′H936A/R933A and β′M932A) with strongly decreased rates of phosphodiester bond formation (18). β′H936/R933 of the TL participates in the catalysis of the phosphodiester bond formation by stabilizing the transition state of the reaction (18). β′M932 of the TL stacks on the base of the NTP bound in the active center and stabilizes the TL in the folded state, which is required for catalysis (18). Accordingly, the alanine substitutions of either β′H936/R933 or β′M932 drastically slow down NMP incorporation, although through different mechanisms (18). Neither of these amino acids participates in the Stl binding (Fig. 1B) (13, 18). We argued that, upon addition of Mg2+ and NTP, Stl would have enough time to inhibit ECs before the reaction had started. Indeed, as shown in Table 1, the half-inhibitory concentrations of Stl for NMP incorporation by β′H936A/R933A and β′M932A RNAPs were 15 to 20 times lower than that for WT RNAP. Given that the mutations slow down the reaction via different ways, the result suggests that the slowness of the mutant RNAPs leads to their Stl sensitivity. Note also a correlation between the inhibitory effects of Stl and the rates of the reactions in Table 1.

The above results suggest that the inhibition by Stl begins to establish itself only after the addition of the reactants. The only common component added to start the NMP incorporation and hydrolysis is Mg2+. We hypothesized that Mg2+ is required for Stl binding to RNAP. According to this proposal, when Mg2+ is added together with NTP, Stl does not have time to bind to all WT ECs before the reaction in them has already finished, thus giving birth to the fast and slow fractions of ECs. The hypothesis predicts that the preincubation of ECs with Mg2+ and Stl before the addition of NTPs would result in more efficient inhibition. To test this prediction, we preincubated WT ECs with Stl and Mg2+ prior to the addition of NTP (a similar experiment cannot be duplicated for phosphodiester bond hydrolysis because the addition of Mg2+ would initiate the reaction). Indeed, as seen from Fig. 1G, the kinetics in the presence of even small concentrations of Stl can be described by a single-exponent equation. Accordingly, when Stl was preincubated with Mg2+, the half-inhibitory concentration of Stl was ∼15 times lower than that when Mg2+ was added together with NTP (Table 1). We therefore conclude that Stl binding to RNAP requires the Mg2+ ion.

We attempted to directly visualize if Stl can bind Mg2+. Stl has a distinct UV absorption spectrum. As seen from Fig. 2A, the spectrum undergoes marked changes upon titration with Mg2+. Together with the above results, this suggests that Stl may indeed chelate Mg2+, although whether the observed change in the Stl spectrum indeed accounts for Mg2+ binding requires further investigation.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Inhibition of RNAP by Stl requires Mg2+. (A). Titration of Mg2+ onto Stl analyzed by UV absorption of Stl. (B) Unassigned electron density between the β′D792 (gray) and hydroxyl of the tetramic acid moiety of Stl (yellow) in the crystal structure of the T. thermophilus RNAP elongation complex (PDB code 2PPB), which can be attributed to Mg2+ (red circle).

DISCUSSION

The principal finding of this study is that Stl requires Mg2+ to establish its inhibitory effect on RNAP. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first observation of a small-molecular-weight inhibitor of RNAP requiring an additional agent for its action. For example, the inhibitor tagetitoxin also binds in the vicinity of the active center and is known to chelate Mg2+ but does not require addition of external Mg2+, while the kinetics of NMP addition in the presence of tagetitoxin does not exhibit behavior similar to that observed with Stl (Fig. 1C and E) (28). The apparent affinity of Stl for Mg2+, as can be deduced from our titration experiment (Fig. 2A), is around 1 mM, which is close to the Mg2+ concentration in the bacterial cell. It is likely, however, that RNAP also provides binding determinants for the Mg2+ ion. Stl binds too far from the catalytic Mg2+ ions of the active site and is unlikely be influenced by them (Fig. 1B). However, careful examination of the crystal structure of the elongation complex bound to Stl reveals an electron density that is unaccounted for between the hydroxyl of the tetramic acid moiety of Stl and β′D792 of the BH, which can be attributed to Mg2+ (15) (Fig. 2B). This observation is consistent with the fact that the Stl analog tirandamycin, which lacks the acetamide group, is a significantly weaker inhibitor than Stl (29). Also, there are some other observations that point to the importance of the β′792 residue in Stl binding. Mutation β′D792G confers strong resistance to Stl (24). Furthermore, RNAPs that have aspartic acid at position β′792 (including T. thermophilus and T. aquaticus RNAPs) are much more sensitive to Stl than the RNAPs that have asparagine at this position (including E. coli RNAP). Finally, the β′N792D substitution in E. coli RNAP leads to a significant enhancement of the enzyme sensitivity to Stl (13). Taken together with our results, these facts suggest that Mg2+ bridges β′N792D and Stl, leading to tighter binding of the latter. This scenario also raises an intriguing possibility of a role for noncatalytic Mg2+ ions in the functioning/inhibition of the enzyme.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Arkady Mustaev for providing the absorbance measurement data.

This work was supported by a Royal Society University Research Fellowship (to Y.Y.), research grants from the United Kingdom Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, the European Research Council (ERC-2007-StG 202994-MTP), the Russian Ministry of Education and Science (8817) (to N.Z.), the Russian Foundation for Basic Research grant 12-04-32062 (to S.Z.), and NIH grant GM59295 and the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation project 14.B25.31.0004 grant (to K.S.).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 17 October 2013.
    • Returned for modification 9 November 2013.
    • Accepted 9 December 2013.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 16 December 2013.
  • Copyright © 2014 Zorov et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Siddhikol C,
    2. Erbstoeszer JW,
    3. Weisblum B
    . 1969. Mode of action of streptolydigin. J. Bacteriol. 99:151–155.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Cassani G,
    2. Burgess RR,
    3. Goodman HM,
    4. Gold L
    . 1971. Inhibition of RNA polymerase by streptolydigin. Nat. New Biol. 230:197–200. doi:10.1038/newbio230197a0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. McClure WR
    . 1980. On the mechanism of streptolydigin inhibition of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. J. Biol. Chem. 255:1610–1616.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Ebright RH
    . 2000. RNA polymerase: structural similarities between bacterial RNA polymerase and eukaryotic RNA polymerase II. J. Mol. Biol. 304:687–698. doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.4309.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Darst SA
    . 2001. Bacterial RNA polymerase. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11:155–162. doi:10.1016/S0959-440X(00)00185-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Cramer P
    . 2002. Multisubunit RNA polymerases. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12:89–97. doi:10.1016/S0959-440X(02)00294-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Campbell EA,
    2. Korzheva N,
    3. Mustaev A,
    4. Murakami K,
    5. Nair S,
    6. Goldfarb A,
    7. Darst SA
    . 2001. Structural mechanism for rifampicin inhibition of bacterial RNA polymerase. Cell 104:901–912. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00286-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Yuzenkova J,
    2. Delgado M,
    3. Nechaev S,
    4. Savalia D,
    5. Epshtein V,
    6. Artsimovitch I,
    7. Mooney RA,
    8. Landick R,
    9. Farias RN,
    10. Salomon R,
    11. Severinov K
    . 2002. Mutations of bacterial RNA polymerase leading to resistance to microcin j25. J. Biol. Chem. 277:50867–50875. doi:10.1074/jbc.M209425200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Adelman K,
    2. Yuzenkova J,
    3. La Porta A,
    4. Zenkin N,
    5. Lee J,
    6. Lis JT,
    7. Borukhov S,
    8. Wang MD,
    9. Severinov K
    . 2004. Molecular mechanism of transcription inhibition by peptide antibiotic microcin J25. Mol. Cell 14:753–762. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2004.05.017.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Mukhopadhyay J,
    2. Sineva E,
    3. Knight J,
    4. Levy RM,
    5. Ebright RH
    . 2004. Antibacterial peptide microcin J25 inhibits transcription by binding within and obstructing the RNA polymerase secondary channel. Mol. Cell 14:739–751. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2004.06.010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Artsimovitch I,
    2. Chu C,
    3. Lynch AS,
    4. Landick R
    . 2003. A new class of bacterial RNA polymerase inhibitor affects nucleotide addition. Science 302:650–654. doi:10.1126/science.1087526.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Campbell EA,
    2. Pavlova O,
    3. Zenkin N,
    4. Leon F,
    5. Irschik H,
    6. Jansen R,
    7. Severinov K,
    8. Darst SA
    . 2005. Structural, functional, and genetic analysis of sorangicin inhibition of bacterial RNA polymerase. EMBO J. 24:674–682. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600499.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  13. 13.↵
    1. Temiakov D,
    2. Zenkin N,
    3. Vassylyeva MN,
    4. Perederina A,
    5. Tahirov TH,
    6. Kashkina E,
    7. Savkina M,
    8. Zorov S,
    9. Nikiforov V,
    10. Igarashi N,
    11. Matsugaki N,
    12. Wakatsuki S,
    13. Severinov K,
    14. Vassylyev DG
    . 2005. Structural basis of transcription inhibition by antibiotic streptolydigin. Mol. Cell 19:655–666. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.07.020.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Tuske S,
    2. Sarafianos SG,
    3. Wang X,
    4. Hudson B,
    5. Sineva E,
    6. Mukhopadhyay J,
    7. Birktoft JJ,
    8. Leroy O,
    9. Ismail S,
    10. Clark AD Jr,
    11. Dharia C,
    12. Napoli A,
    13. Laptenko O,
    14. Lee J,
    15. Borukhov S,
    16. Ebright RH,
    17. Arnold E
    . 2005. Inhibition of bacterial RNA polymerase by streptolydigin: stabilization of a straight-bridge-helix active-center conformation. Cell 122:541–552. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.017.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Vassylyev DG,
    2. Vassylyeva MN,
    3. Zhang J,
    4. Palangat M,
    5. Artsimovitch I,
    6. Landick R
    . 2007. Structural basis for substrate loading in bacterial RNA polymerase. Nature 448:163–168. doi:10.1038/nature05931.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Sosunov V,
    2. Sosunova E,
    3. Mustaev A,
    4. Bass I,
    5. Nikiforov V,
    6. Goldfarb A
    . 2003. Unified two-metal mechanism of RNA synthesis and degradation by RNA polymerase. EMBO J. 22:2234–2244. doi:10.1093/emboj/cdg193.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  17. 17.↵
    1. Sosunov V,
    2. Zorov S,
    3. Sosunova E,
    4. Nikolaev A,
    5. Zakeyeva I,
    6. Bass I,
    7. Goldfarb A,
    8. Nikiforov V,
    9. Severinov K,
    10. Mustaev A
    . 2005. The involvement of the aspartate triad of the active center in all catalytic activities of multisubunit RNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:4202–4211. doi:10.1093/nar/gki688.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Yuzenkova Y,
    2. Bochkareva A,
    3. Tadigotla VR,
    4. Roghanian M,
    5. Zorov S,
    6. Severinov K,
    7. Zenkin N
    . 2010. Stepwise mechanism for transcription fidelity. BMC Biol. 8:54. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-8-54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Yuzenkova Y,
    2. Zenkin N
    . 2010. Central role of the RNA polymerase trigger loop in intrinsic RNA hydrolysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:10878–10883. doi:10.1073/pnas.0914424107.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Zhang J,
    2. Palangat M,
    3. Landick R
    . 2010. Role of the RNA polymerase trigger loop in catalysis and pausing. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17:99–104. doi:10.1038/nsmb.1732.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Severinov K,
    2. Soushko M,
    3. Goldfarb A,
    4. Nikiforov V
    . 1993. Rifampicin region revisited. New rifampicin-resistant and streptolydigin-resistant mutants in the beta subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. J. Biol. Chem. 268:14820–14825.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Heisler LM,
    2. Suzuki H,
    3. Landick R,
    4. Gross CA
    . 1993. Four contiguous amino acids define the target for streptolydigin resistance in the beta subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. J. Biol. Chem. 268:25369–25375.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Severinov K,
    2. Markov D,
    3. Severinova E,
    4. Nikiforov V,
    5. Landick R,
    6. Darst SA,
    7. Goldfarb A
    . 1995. Streptolydigin-resistant mutants in an evolutionarily conserved region of the beta′ subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. J. Biol. Chem. 270:23926–23929. doi:10.1074/jbc.270.41.23926.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Yang X,
    2. Price CW
    . 1995. Streptolydigin resistance can be conferred by alterations to either the beta or beta′ subunits of Bacillus subtilis RNA polymerase. J. Biol. Chem. 270:23930–23933. doi:10.1074/jbc.270.41.23930.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Kuznedelov K,
    2. Minakhin L,
    3. Severinov K
    . 2003. Preparation and characterization of recombinant Thermus aquaticus RNA polymerase. Methods Enzymol. 370:94–108. doi:10.1016/S0076-6879(03)70009-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Sidorenkov I,
    2. Komissarova N,
    3. Kashlev M
    . 1998. Crucial role of the RNA:DNA hybrid in the processivity of transcription. Mol. Cell 2:55–64. doi:10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80113-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Zenkin N,
    2. Yuzenkova Y,
    3. Severinov K
    . 2006. Transcript-assisted transcriptional proofreading. Science 313:518–520. doi:10.1126/science.1127422.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Yuzenkova Y,
    2. Roghanian M,
    3. Bochkareva A,
    4. Zenkin N
    . 2013. Tagetitoxin inhibits transcription by stabilizing pre-translocated state of the elongation complex. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:9257–9265. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt708.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Reusser F
    . 1976. Tirandamycin, an inhibitor of bacterial ribonucleic acid polymerase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 10:618–622. doi:10.1128/AAC.10.4.618.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Antibiotic Streptolydigin Requires Noncatalytic Mg2+ for Binding to RNA Polymerase
Savva Zorov, Yulia Yuzenkova, Vadim Nikiforov, Konstantin Severinov, Nikolay Zenkin
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Feb 2014, 58 (3) 1420-1424; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02248-13

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Antibiotic Streptolydigin Requires Noncatalytic Mg2+ for Binding to RNA Polymerase
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Antibiotic Streptolydigin Requires Noncatalytic Mg2+ for Binding to RNA Polymerase
Savva Zorov, Yulia Yuzenkova, Vadim Nikiforov, Konstantin Severinov, Nikolay Zenkin
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Feb 2014, 58 (3) 1420-1424; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02248-13
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596