Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Epidemiology and Surveillance

Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Urinary Tract Infection following Solid Organ Transplantation

Kyle D. Brizendine, Sandra S. Richter, Eric D. Cober, David van Duin
Kyle D. Brizendine
aDepartment of Infectious Disease, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sandra S. Richter
bDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric D. Cober
aDepartment of Infectious Disease, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David van Duin
cDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.04284-14
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) is an emerging pathogen with a devastating impact on organ transplant recipients (OTRs). Data describing urinary tract infections (UTIs) due to CRKP, compared to extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing and susceptible K. pneumoniae, are lacking. We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing OTRs with a first episode of UTI due to CRKP, ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae, or susceptible K. pneumoniae. We identified 108 individuals; 22 (20%) had UTIs due to CRKP, 22 (20%) due to ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae, and 64 (60%) due to susceptible K. pneumoniae. Compared to susceptible K. pneumoniae (27%), patients with UTIs due to CRKP or ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae were more likely to have a ≥24-hour stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) before or after development of the UTI (64% and 77%, respectively; P < 0.001). Among 105/108 hospitalized patients (97%), the median lengths of stay prior to UTI with CRKP or ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae (7 and 8 days, respectively) were significantly longer than that for susceptible K. pneumoniae (1 day; P < 0.001). Clinical failure was observed for 8 patients (36%) with CRKP, 4 (18%) with ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae, and 9 (14%) with susceptible K. pneumoniae (P = 0.073). Microbiological failure was seen for 10 patients (45%) with CRKP, compared with 2 (9%) with ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae and 2 (3%) with susceptible K. pneumoniae (P < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression analyses, CRKP was associated with greater odds of microbiological failure (versus ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae: odds ratio [OR], 9.36, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.94 to 72.1; versus susceptible K. pneumoniae: OR, 31.4, 95% CI, 5.91 to 264). In conclusion, CRKP is associated with ICU admission, long length of stay, and microbiological failure among OTRs with UTIs. Greater numbers are needed to determine risk factors for infection and differences in meaningful endpoints associated with carbapenem resistance.

INTRODUCTION

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) is a serious emerging global pathogen with very limited therapeutic options. Its impact on organ transplant recipients (OTRs) in particular is potentially devastating, given their use of immunosuppression and the frequency of their exposure to the health care system, where Klebsiella spp. cause approximately 8% of health care-associated infections in the United States. Twenty-seven percent of health care-associated infections are catheter-associated urinary tract infections (UTIs) and, among facilities reporting these to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN), 20% observed that at least one Klebsiella sp. was carbapenem resistant (1). CRKP UTIs among OTRs present diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, and data addressing these issues are lacking. In particular, data describing the clinical significance of CRKP UTIs, compared to extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing and susceptible K. pneumoniae UTIs, are needed to provide new insights into the treatment and prevention of these complicated infections. Herein we review first episodes of UTI due to CRKP, ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae, or susceptible K. pneumoniae in all OTRs, with the aim of comparing microbiological and clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cases.We identified cases of UTI diagnosed at Cleveland Clinic, a 1,400-bed academic medical center in Cleveland, Ohio, between 2006 and 2012 through a retrospective review of microbiology reports and electronic medical records of every OTR with positive urine culture results for K. pneumoniae. Only the first episode of UTI following transplantation was considered. A standardized case report form was used to collect data on demographic characteristics, clinical features, treatments, and outcomes. This study was approved by the Cleveland Clinic institutional review board.

Definitions.UTIs were defined according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/NHSN surveillance definition (2). The date of diagnosis was the date on which the urine culture was obtained. Relapse was defined as the development of UTI with the same pathogen within 30 days after diagnosis of the initial episode. The time to adequate antibiotic therapy was the number of days between the date on which the urine culture was obtained and the date on which an appropriate agent with in vitro activity was administered. Intensive care unit (ICU) admission was defined by a stay of ≥24 h at any time during hospitalization, before or after development of the UTI. A urinary catheter was considered present if there was documentation of a catheter at the time the urine culture was obtained. Predictors of the primary outcomes included age, sex, transplant type, bacteremia, length of stay (LOS) prior to UTI, ICU admission at any time during hospitalization, and the presence of a urinary catheter. The primary outcomes were clinical failure and microbiological failure. Clinical failure was defined as continued fever or urgency, frequency, dysuria, suprapubic tenderness, or costovertebral angle pain or tenderness 72 h after receiving adequate antimicrobial therapy. Microbiological failure occurred if positive urine culture results of ≥105 CFU/ml of the original organism were found ≥72 h after appropriate antibiotic treatment (3).

Infections were categorized into 3 groups, i.e., CRKP, ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae, or susceptible K. pneumoniae, based on the results of susceptibility testing performed using the automated Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, NC) supplemented by manual methods. Isolates with ertapenem MICs of ≥4 μg/ml and positive modified Hodge test results were considered CRKP (4). ESBL production was determined by the Vitek 2 test detection of reduction of growth in wells containing cephalosporins with clavulanic acid, compared to wells with the cephalosporin alone. Isolates with positive ESBL test results were reported as resistant to penicillins, cephalosporins, and aztreonam regardless of the MICs. Fosfomycin susceptibility was determined by the Etest method (bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, NC) performed with Mueller-Hinton agar (BBL; Becton, Dickinson). This methodology represented the workflow in the microbiology laboratory and generated results incorporated by clinicians into the care of patients in a real-world setting at our institution.

Statistical analyses.Descriptive statistics were computed, and differences in characteristics across groups were analyzed by the chi-square test, analysis of variance techniques, and nonparametric median comparisons as appropriate. Multivariable analyses for factors associated with microbiological failure and clinical failure were performed using stepwise multiple logistic regression analyses. The criterion for entering the model was significance at the α = 0.20 level, while the criterion for remaining in the model was significance at the α = 0.05 level. Odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Model fits were assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic. All statistical tests were two-tailed and utilized a 5% significance level. Analyses were performed using JMP Pro 10 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

RESULTS

We identified 108 individuals; 22 (20%) had UTIs due to CRKP, 22 (20%) due to ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae, and 64 (60%) due to susceptible K. pneumoniae. There were 40 kidney-only transplants (37%) and 68 transplants of other solid organs (63%). The mean age was 53 years, and 42 patients (39%) were male. Overall, the median time from transplantation to UTI was 185 days (interquartile range [IQR], 38 to 712 days). As shown in Table 1, bacteremic UTI was found in 7 patients with CRKP (32%), 4 with ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae (18%), and 8 with susceptible K. pneumoniae (13%) (P = 0.150). Compared to susceptible K. pneumoniae (27%), patients with UTIs due to CRKP or ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae were more likely to have a ≥24-hour stay in the ICU before or after development of the UTI (64% and 77%, respectively; P < 0.001). Patients with UTIs due to susceptible K. pneumoniae were significantly less likely to have a urinary catheter. Relapse of UTI occurred for 7 patients with CRKP (32%), 4 with ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae (18%), and 7 with susceptible K. pneumoniae (11%) (P = 0.075). Among 105/108 hospitalized patients (97%), the median LOS prior to UTI for CRKP and ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae (7 and 8 days, respectively) were significantly longer than that for susceptible K. pneumoniae (1 day; P < 0.001). The mean time to adequate antibiotic therapy for CRKP (2.73 days) was significantly longer than those for ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae or susceptible K. pneumoniae (1.36 and 1.31 days, respectively; P = 0.006).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Characteristics of 108 OTRs with a first episode of UTI due to CRKP, ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae, or susceptible K. pneumoniae at Cleveland Clinic in 2006 to 2012

Clinical failure was observed for 8 patients with CRKP (36%), compared with 4 patients with ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae (18%) and 9 patients with susceptible K. pneumoniae (14%) (P = 0.073). Microbiological failure was seen for 10 patients with CRKP (45%), compared with 2 patients with ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae (9%) and 2 patients with susceptible K. pneumoniae (3%) (P < 0.001). The all-cause mortality rate during hospitalization was 8% (9/108 patients). There were 4 deaths among patients with CRKP and 4 among those with ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae. In multivariable logistic regression analyses controlling for age, sex, ICU admission, and transplant type, UTI caused by CRKP was independently associated with greater odds of microbiological failure (versus ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae: OR, 9.36 [95% CI, 1.94 to 72.1]; versus susceptible K. pneumoniae: OR, 31.4 [95% CI, 5.91 to 264]). Controlling for age, sex, ICU admission, and urinary catheters, there were greater odds of clinical failure associated with CRKP, but that finding did not reach statistical significance (versus ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae: OR, 2.26 [95% CI, 0.57 to 10.2]; versus susceptible K. pneumoniae: OR, 2.17 [95% CI, 0.61 to 7.53]).

With regard to treatment, considering only OTRs with UTIs due to CRKP, 10 patients (45%) received an antibiotic regimen containing colistin, 14 (64%) tigecycline, 1 (5%) a carbapenem, 6 (27%) an aminoglycoside, and 10 (45%) fosfomycin (Table 2). Fourteen patients (64%) received combination antibiotic therapy with at least 2 different classes of drugs. Notably, both clinical and microbiological responses occurred for 3/14 patients (21%) treated with tigecycline, 4/10 (40%) treated with colistin, 3/6 (50%) treated with aminoglycosides, and 5/10 (50%) treated with fosfomycin. Generally, too few patients received any specific agent to permit meaningful comparisons among drugs. Therefore, no individual agent could be shown to be associated with the primary outcomes in any of the multiple models evaluated (data not shown).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Treatment and outcomes for 22 OTRs with a first episode of UTI due to CRKP at Cleveland Clinic in 2006 to 2012

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, the present study is the largest detailed clinical characterization and comparison of OTRs with UTIs due to CRKP, ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae, or susceptible K. pneumoniae. We observed that UTIs caused by CRKP were associated with greater odds of microbiological failure. We documented that UTIs due to CRKP or ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae occurred significantly earlier after transplantation than those due to susceptible K. pneumoniae and were associated with a urinary catheter at diagnosis, a ≥24-hour stay in the ICU either before or after development of the UTI, and longer LOS prior to the UTI. These data support the idea that, during the study period, CRKP was largely a nosocomial pathogen. We further observed a trend toward an increased likelihood of patients with CRKP experiencing relapse within 30 days and continued fever or urgency, frequency, dysuria, suprapubic tenderness, or costovertebral angle pain or tenderness 72 h after receiving adequate antimicrobial therapy. The mean time to initiation of that therapy was significantly longer for CRKP.

UTI occurs more frequently in OTRs than in the nontransplant population. For example, UTI, estimated to be associated with approximately 44 to 47% of all infectious complications (5), is the most common infection following kidney transplantation, but published studies of UTI due to CRKP in OTRs are lacking. Simkins and colleagues compared 9 kidney transplant recipients with UTIs due to CRKP and 34 with carbapenem-susceptible K. pneumoniae (6). They observed a trend toward more bacteremia among cases of CRKP, as well as a significantly higher mortality rate at 6.5 months. Unfortunately, other investigations into CRKP among OTRs excluded UTIs (7–10). Still others included both OTRs and nontransplant patients but focused on a particular therapy (11), bacteremia (12, 13), or factors associated with the development of UTIs among patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria (14). Extrapolating from data for nontransplant patients is problematic. It has been shown that, among mostly (81%) nontransplant patients with UTIs due to CRKP, microbiological failure occurred in only 5 cases (24%) and bacteremia in 3 (14%) (15). In contrast, we observed microbiological failure for 45% of OTRs and bacteremic UTI due to CRKP for 32%. In addition, it was shown that aminoglycosides were associated with clearance of CRKP bacteriuria among nontransplant patients (16), but our data demonstrated that 3/6 aminoglycoside-exposed OTRs (50%) experienced microbiological failure. We hypothesize that immunosuppressive medication enhances the importance of early active antimicrobial therapy and accounts in part for the increased rates of microbiological failure and bacteremia.

Our results are generally in agreement with the other very limited published studies. In Brazil, Argentina, and Israel, 12 OTRs with UTIs due to CRKP have been described, 6 (50%) of whom were bacteremic (17–19). Mortality rates ranged from 0 to 33%. Finally, in a recent study of patients from the United States, there were 11 OTRs with UTIs due to CRKP (14). While detailed clinical characterizations were not provided, multivariate logistic regression analyses identified solid organ transplantation as independently associated with UTI among all patients with CRKP bacteriuria (OR, 4.50 [95% CI, 1.39 to 14.52]).

In the present study, we report an additional 22 OTRs with UTIs due to CRKP, with ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae and susceptible K. pneumoniae for comparison. As shown, many features of UTIs due to ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae were similar to those for CRKP; however, important differences emerged, particularly in the increased odds of microbiological failure associated with CRKP. Failure to include ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae would have placed the findings in an improper context, and the results would have been much less informative. Although our study provides some advantages, the observational design is limited by unmeasured confounders, such as the presence of ureteral stents and confounding by indication. Therefore, some of our observations should be interpreted cautiously. These data reflect the biases of the clinicians at our institution. For example, providers more often repeated urine cultures for OTRs with UTIs due to CRKP or ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae, which could bias the results with regard to microbiological failure, in comparison to susceptible K. pneumoniae. Finally, ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae and carbapenem resistance were defined phenotypically. During the study period, testing for K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) production through detection of blaKPC was not performed; however, subsequent PCR testing of the isolates with positive results from the modified Hodge test revealed the overwhelming majority to be blaKPC positive. While the phenotypic definitions may be somewhat limited, results reflect the information available to providers caring for these patients in a real-world setting. Therefore, our data incorporating these definitions remain largely informative and relevant.

In conclusion, CRKP is associated with microbiological failure among OTRs with UTIs and may be an important predictor of clinical outcomes. There are few therapeutic options for CRKP, and use of the available agents is limited by the parenteral route of administration and toxicity, particularly among patients with recent or ongoing organ failure syndromes, which are frequently encountered among OTRs. This underscores the importance of infection prevention. Additional studies with OTRs, with greater patient numbers and an emphasis on determining modifiable risk factors for the development of infection, are needed. These will permit discovery of significant differences in clinically meaningful endpoints associated with carbapenem resistance, which would be invaluable to clinicians caring for OTRs.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 11 September 2014.
    • Returned for modification 12 October 2014.
    • Accepted 2 November 2014.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 10 November 2014.
  • Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Sievert DM,
    2. Ricks P,
    3. Edwards JR,
    4. Schneider A,
    5. Patel J,
    6. Srinivasan A,
    7. Kallen A,
    8. Limbago B,
    9. Fridkin S
    . 2013. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009–2010. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 34:1–14. doi:10.1086/668770.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2014. CDC/NHSN surveillance definitions for specific types of infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/17pscNosInfDef_current.pdf.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Lautenbach E,
    2. Patel JB,
    3. Bilker WB,
    4. Edelstein PH,
    5. Fishman NO
    . 2001. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: risk factors for infection and impact of resistance on outcomes. Clin Infect Dis 32:1162–1171. doi:10.1086/319757.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lee K,
    2. Chong Y,
    3. Shin HB,
    4. Kim YA,
    5. Yong D,
    6. Yum JH
    . 2001. Modified Hodge and EDTA-disk synergy tests to screen metallo-β-lactamase-producing strains of Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species. Clin Microbiol Infect 7:88–91. doi:10.1046/j.1469-0691.2001.00204.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Alangaden GJ,
    2. Thyagarajan R,
    3. Gruber SA,
    4. Morawski K,
    5. Garnick J,
    6. El-Amm JM,
    7. West MS,
    8. Sillix DH,
    9. Chandrasekar PH,
    10. Haririan A
    . 2006. Infectious complications after kidney transplantation: current epidemiology and associated risk factors. Clin Transplant 20:401–409. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0012.2006.00519.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Simkins J,
    2. Muggia V,
    3. Cohen HW,
    4. Minamoto GY
    . 2014. Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in kidney transplant recipients: a case-control study. Transpl Infect Dis 16:775–782. doi:10.1111/tid.12276.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Patel G,
    2. Huprikar S,
    3. Factor SH,
    4. Jenkins SG,
    5. Calfee DP
    . 2008. Outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection and the impact of antimicrobial and adjunctive therapies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 29:1099–1106. doi:10.1086/592412.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Kalpoe JS,
    2. Sonnenberg E,
    3. Factor SH,
    4. del Rio Martin J,
    5. Schiano T,
    6. Patel G,
    7. Huprikar S
    . 2012. Mortality associated with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl 18:468–474. doi:10.1002/lt.23374.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Clancy CJ,
    2. Chen L,
    3. Shields RK,
    4. Zhao Y,
    5. Cheng S,
    6. Chavda KD,
    7. Hao B,
    8. Hong JH,
    9. Doi Y,
    10. Kwak EJ,
    11. Silveira FP,
    12. Abdel-Massih R,
    13. Bogdanovich T,
    14. Humar A,
    15. Perlin DS,
    16. Kreiswirth BN,
    17. Hong Nguyen M
    . 2013. Epidemiology and molecular characterization of bacteremia due to carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 13:2619–2633. doi:10.1111/ajt.12424.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Lübbert C,
    2. Becker-Rux D,
    3. Rodloff AC,
    4. Laudi S,
    5. Busch T,
    6. Bartels M,
    7. Kaisers UX
    . 2014. Colonization of liver transplant recipients with KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae is associated with high infection rates and excess mortality: a case-control analysis. Infection 42:309–316. doi:10.1007/s15010-013-0547-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Neuner EA,
    2. Sekeres J,
    3. Hall GS,
    4. van Duin D
    . 2012. Experience with fosfomycin for treatment of urinary tract infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:5744–5748. doi:10.1128/AAC.00402-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Nguyen M,
    2. Eschenauer GA,
    3. Bryan M,
    4. O'Neil K,
    5. Furuya EY,
    6. Della-Latta P,
    7. Kubin CJ
    . 2010. Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia: factors correlated with clinical and microbiologic outcomes. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 67:180–184. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.02.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Neuner EA,
    2. Yeh JY,
    3. Hall GS,
    4. Sekeres J,
    5. Endimiani A,
    6. Bonomo RA,
    7. Shrestha NK,
    8. Fraser TG,
    9. van Duin D
    . 2011. Treatment and outcomes in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 69:357–362. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.10.013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Qureshi ZA,
    2. Syed A,
    3. Clarke LG,
    4. Doi Y,
    5. Shields RK
    . 2014. Epidemiology and clinical outcomes of patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteriuria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3100–3104. doi:10.1128/AAC.02445-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Alexander BT,
    2. Marschall J,
    3. Tibbetts RJ,
    4. Neuner EA,
    5. Dunne WM, Jr,
    6. Ritchie DJ
    . 2012. Treatment and clinical outcomes of urinary tract infections caused by KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae in a retrospective cohort. Clin Ther 34:1314–1323. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.05.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Satlin MJ,
    2. Kubin CJ,
    3. Blumenthal JS,
    4. Cohen AB,
    5. Furuya EY,
    6. Wilson SJ,
    7. Jenkins SG,
    8. Calfee DP
    . 2011. Comparative effectiveness of aminoglycosides, polymyxin B, and tigecycline for clearance of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae from urine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:5893–5899. doi:10.1128/AAC.00387-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Bergamasco MD,
    2. Barroso Barbosa M,
    3. de Oliveira Garcia D,
    4. Cipullo R,
    5. Moreira JC,
    6. Baia C,
    7. Barbosa V,
    8. Abboud CS
    . 2012. Infection with Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae in solid organ transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis 14:198–205. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3062.2011.00688.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Cicora F,
    2. Mos F,
    3. Paz M,
    4. Allende NG,
    5. Roberti J
    . 2013. Infections with blaKPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in renal transplant patients: a retrospective study. Transplant Proc 45:3389–3393. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.07.064.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Raviv Y,
    2. Shitrit D,
    3. Amital A,
    4. Fox B,
    5. Bakal I,
    6. Tauber R,
    7. Bishara J,
    8. Kramer MR
    . 2012. Multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae acquisition in lung transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 26:E388–E394. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0012.2012.01671.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Urinary Tract Infection following Solid Organ Transplantation
Kyle D. Brizendine, Sandra S. Richter, Eric D. Cober, David van Duin
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Dec 2014, 59 (1) 553-557; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.04284-14

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Urinary Tract Infection following Solid Organ Transplantation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Urinary Tract Infection following Solid Organ Transplantation
Kyle D. Brizendine, Sandra S. Richter, Eric D. Cober, David van Duin
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Dec 2014, 59 (1) 553-557; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.04284-14
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596