Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Clinical Therapeutics

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of a Weight-Based Dosing Regimen of Cefoxitin for Perioperative Surgical Prophylaxis in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients

Pierre Moine, Scott W. Mueller, Jonathan A. Schoen, Kevin B. Rothchild, Douglas N. Fish
Pierre Moine
aUniversity of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Aurora, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott W. Mueller
bDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan A. Schoen
cUniversity of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Surgical Weight Loss Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin B. Rothchild
cUniversity of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Surgical Weight Loss Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Douglas N. Fish
bDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, Colorado, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00585-16
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • TABLE 1

    Subject demographics

    Patient characteristicValue fora:P valueb
    All patients(n = 30)Patients with BMIs of <40 kg/m2 (n = 5)Patients with BMIs of ≥40 kg/m2 (n = 25)
    Age (yr)40.6 ± 11.448.8 ± 6.338.9 ± 11.60.02
    Sex (no. of females/no. of males)26/43/223/20.12
    Ht (cm)166 ± 10174 ± 8164 ± 90.04
    Total body wt (kg)125.6 ± 22.4112.4 ± 10.4128.2 ± 23.40.03
    Ideal body wt (kg)58.6 ± 9.467.0 ± 8.256.9 ± 8.80.06
    Lean body wt, Hume (kg)63.6 ± 9.564.1 ± 6.363.5 ± 10.10.87
    Lean body wt, LBW2005 (kg)59.9 ± 9.663.6 ± 9.659.1 ± 9.60.38
    Adjusted body wt (kg)85.4 ± 11.985.2 ± 8.285.4 ± 12.60.96
    BMI (kg/m2)45.9 ± 8.037.0 ± 2.247.6 ± 7.6<0.0001
    Baseline serum creatinine (mg/dl)0.86 ± 0.280.97 ± 0.130.84 ± 0.300.14
    Surgical procedure (no. of patients)Laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass (29)
    Laparoscopic gastric band placement (1)
    Dose (mg)5,020 ± 8544,500 ± 5005,124 ± 8780.06
    Duration of infusion (min)5.1 ± 0.95.0 ± 0.75.1 ± 1.10.80
    Time from end of drug infusion to incision (min)1.2 ± 1.61.6 ± 0.91.3 ± 1.70.58
    • ↵a Values are means ± SDs or numbers.

    • ↵b Comparison of patients with BMIs of <40 kg/m2 and those with BMIs of ≥40 kg/m2.

  • TABLE 2

    Cefoxitin serum and tissue pharmacokinetic parameters in obese surgical patients with BMIs of >30 kg/m2

    ParameterValue fora:P valueb
    All patients(n = 30)Patients with BMIs of <40 kg/m2 (n = 5)Patients with BMIs of ≥40 kg/m2 (n = 25)
    Serum pharmacokinetics
        Observed Cmax (mg/liter)216.15 ± 41.80205.35 ± 27.60218.31 ± 44.210.42
        Observed Cmax/D (mg/liter/g)44.29 ± 12.1146.35 ± 10.1443.88 ± 12.620.65
        Observed Tmax (min)12.9 ± 4.611.6 ± 2.613.1 ± 4.90.34
        AUC0-∞ (μg · h/ml)266.92 ± 97.51328.30 ± 34.03254.64 ± 101.750.009
        CL (ml/min)349.02 ± 118.22232.11 ± 48.28372.40 ± 114.37<0.001
        CL/TBW (ml/min/kg)2.80 ± 0.912.05 ± 0.282.94 ± 0.92<0.001
        CL/IBW (ml/min/kg)6.04 ± 2.093.44 ± 0.376.56 ± 1.89<0.001
        CL/LBW2005 (ml/min/kg)5.88 ± 1.993.65 ± 0.456.33 ± 1.88<0.001
        CL/AdjBW (ml/min/kg)4.09 ± 1.332.70 ± 0.314.37 ± 1.28<0.001
        V (liters)29.28 ± 9.8321.34 ± 9.1231.12 ± 9.440.08
        V/TBW (liters/kg)0.23 ± 0.070.19 ± 0.060.24 ± 0.070.25
        V/IBW (liters/kg)0.51 ± 0.190.32 ± 0.120.55 ± 0.180.01
        V/LBW2005 (liters/kg)0.49 ± 0.170.34 ± 0.140.53 ± 0.160.05
        V/AdjBW (liters/kg)0.34 ± 0.110.25 ± 0.090.36 ± 0.110.08
        t1/2 (h)1.05 ± 0.541.06 ± 0.381.05 ± 0.580.96
        kel (h)0.75 ± 0.200.71 ± 0.180.75 ± 0.210.33
    Tissue pharmacokinetics
        Observed Cmax (mg/liter)12.62 ± 5.8911.08 ± 2.3512.93 ± 6.360.28
        Observed Tmax (min)16.7 ± 5.916.8 ± 6.616.7 ± 6.00.97
        AUC0-∞ (μg · h/ml)15.35 ± 6.2413.09 ± 3.5815.80 ± 6.610.22
        t1/2 (h)1.73 ± 0.731.66 ± 0.651.74 ± 0.750.81
        kel (h)0.45 ± 0.150.49 ± 0.260.44 ± 0.130.70
    Serum concns
        Surgical opening (mg/liter)174.41 ± 38.07168.48 ± 36.58175.60 ± 38.980.71
        60 min postinfusion (mg/liter)93.13 ± 23.6997.31 ± 31.8092.30 ± 22.480.75
        180 min postinfusion/surgical closure (mg/liter)37.62 ± 24.3450.73 ± 34.2535.00 ± 21.840.38
    Tissue concns
        Surgical opening (mg/liter)12.62 ± 5.8911.08 ± 2.3512.93 ± 6.360.28
        60 min postinfusion (mg/liter)6.33 ± 2.016.97 ± 3.266.21 ± 1.740.64
        180 min postinfusion/surgical closure (mg/liter)4.26 ± 1.804.49 ± 2.214.22 ± 1.750.81
    Tissue/serum concn ratios
        Surgical opening (mg/liter)0.08 ± 0.050.07 ± 0.020.08 ± 0.050.37
        60 min postinfusion (mg/liter)0.07 ± 0.020.07 ± 0.010.07 ± 0.021.00
        180 min postinfusion/surgical closure (mg/liter)0.14 ± 0.070.10 ± 0.040.14 ± 0.070.09
        Ratio of tissue/blood AUCs from surgical opening to closure0.08 ± 0.030.07 ± 0.050.08 ± 0.040.28
    • ↵a Values are means ± SDs.

    • ↵b Comparison of patients with BMIs of <40 kg/m2 and those with BMIs of ≥40 kg/m2.

  • TABLE 3

    MIC frequency distribution for Escherichia coli, Bacteroides fragilis, and Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected from the EUCAST database

    OrganismNo. of isolates% of isolates with indicated cefoxitin MIC (mg/liter)a
    <0.1250.1250.250.51248163264>64
    E. coli66,874000.12.16.934.337.112.83.81.71.10.1
    B. fragilis1,898000.80.10.22.227.534.417.48.83.65.1
    S. aureus85600.11.07.832.427.819.53.41.61.90.83.6
    • ↵a Current CLSI susceptibility MIC breakpoints are indicated by distribution percentages that are underlined.

  • TABLE 4

    PTA of single-dose cefoxitin regimens in obese patients with BMIs of >30 kg/m2 against Escherichia coli, Bacteroides fragilis, and Staphylococcus aureus

    Compartment and pharmacodynamic targetCefoxitin dosePTA by pathogen (%)a
    E. coli at indicated time after dose (h)B. fragilis at indicated time after dose (h)S. aureus at indicated time after dose (h)
    123412341234
    Serum
        fT>MIC of 100%40 mg/kg97957646927947181001007836
    2 g89683714743610210068193
    2 g in nonobese patients (from reference 34)98351246913309835124
        fT>MIC of 70%40 mg/kg98959180949077541001009984
    2 g9284664282603213100956226
    Tissue
        fT>MIC of 100%40 mg/kg277210000552682
    2 g4100000017310
        fT>MIC of 70%40 mg/kg381663000063442610
    2 g62000000251030
    • ↵a Values meeting the desired goal of PTA of ≥90% at each time point are in bold.

  • TABLE 5

    PTA at fT>MIC of 100% of single-dose cefoxitin regimens in obese patients with BMIs of <40 kg/m2 and ≥40 kg/m2 against Escherichia coli, Bacteroides fragilis, and Staphylococcus aureus using EUCAST susceptibility data

    Compartment and BMICefoxitin dosePTA by pathogen (%)a
    E. coli at indicated time after dose (h)B. fragilis at indicated time after dose (h)S. aureus at indicated time after dose (h)
    123412341234
    Serum
        BMI < 40 kg/m240 mg/kg989588688575532894939282
        BMI ≥ 40 kg/m240 mg/kg979482658672513194938777
        BMI < 40 kg/m22 g95856234704520692897959
        BMI ≥ 40 kg/m22 g91765031613416792866950
    Tissue
        BMI < 40 kg/m240 mg/kg37130041006339160
        BMI ≥ 40 kg/m240 mg/kg35153200006438198
        BMI < 40 kg/m22 g7200000030900
        BMI ≥ 40 kg/m22 g5100000019700
    • ↵a Values meeting the desired goal of PTA of ≥90% at each time point are in bold.

  • TABLE 6

    PTA of single-dose cefoxitin surgical prophylaxis regimens according to pathogen MIC at different time points after dosing in obese patients with BMIs of >30 kg/m2

    fT>MIC and cefoxitin doseTime (h)PTA (%) at indicated MIC (mg/liter)a
    0.51248b16c3264128
    fT>MIC of 100%
        40 mg/kg110010010010010090250
    2100100100100822510
    310010097753020
    49992713450
        2 g11001001001007390
    21001009767120
    31009364170
    487612220
    fT>MIC of 70%
        40 mg/kg1100100100100100984510
    2100100100100996590
    310010010099772310
    410010099844040
        2 g110010010010091220
    2100100100954120
    31001009660100
    410096722510
    • ↵a Values meeting the desired goal of PTA of ≥90% at each time point are in bold.

    • ↵b Current CLSI breakpoints = 8 mg/liter for E. coli and S. aureus.

    • ↵c Current CLSI breakpoint = 16 mg/liter for B. fragilis.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of a Weight-Based Dosing Regimen of Cefoxitin for Perioperative Surgical Prophylaxis in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients
Pierre Moine, Scott W. Mueller, Jonathan A. Schoen, Kevin B. Rothchild, Douglas N. Fish
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Sep 2016, 60 (10) 5885-5893; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00585-16

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of a Weight-Based Dosing Regimen of Cefoxitin for Perioperative Surgical Prophylaxis in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of a Weight-Based Dosing Regimen of Cefoxitin for Perioperative Surgical Prophylaxis in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients
Pierre Moine, Scott W. Mueller, Jonathan A. Schoen, Kevin B. Rothchild, Douglas N. Fish
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Sep 2016, 60 (10) 5885-5893; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00585-16
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596