Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Epidemiology and Surveillance

In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of a Siderophore Cephalosporin, S-649266, against Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Isolates, Including Carbapenem-Resistant Strains

Naoki Kohira, Joshua West, Akinobu Ito, Tsukasa Ito-Horiyama, Rio Nakamura, Takafumi Sato, Stephen Rittenhouse, Masakatsu Tsuji, Yoshinori Yamano
Naoki Kohira
aDiscovery Research Laboratory for Core Therapeutic Areas, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joshua West
bGlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Akinobu Ito
aDiscovery Research Laboratory for Core Therapeutic Areas, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tsukasa Ito-Horiyama
aDiscovery Research Laboratory for Core Therapeutic Areas, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rio Nakamura
aDiscovery Research Laboratory for Core Therapeutic Areas, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takafumi Sato
aDiscovery Research Laboratory for Core Therapeutic Areas, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen Rittenhouse
bGlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masakatsu Tsuji
aDiscovery Research Laboratory for Core Therapeutic Areas, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoshinori Yamano
aDiscovery Research Laboratory for Core Therapeutic Areas, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01695-15
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

S-649266 is a novel siderophore cephalosporin antibiotic with a catechol moiety on the 3-position side chain. Two sets of clinical isolate collections were used to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of S-649266 against Enterobacteriaceae. These sets included 617 global isolates collected between 2009 and 2011 and 233 β-lactamase-identified isolates, including 47 KPC-, 49 NDM-, 12 VIM-, and 8 IMP-producers. The MIC90 values of S-649266 against the first set of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Serratia marcescens, Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter aerogenes, and Enterobacter cloacae isolates were all ≤1 μg/ml, and there were only 8 isolates (1.3%) among these 617 clinical isolates with MIC values of ≥8 μg/ml. In the second set, the MIC values of S-649266 were ≤4 μg/ml against 109 strains among 116 KPC-producing and class B (metallo) carbapenemase-producing strains. In addition, S-649266 showed MIC values of ≤2 μg/ml against each of the 13 strains that produced other types of carbapenemases such as SME, NMC, and OXA-48. The mechanisms of the decreased susceptibility of 7 class B carbapenemase-producing strains with MIC values of ≥16 μg/ml are uncertain. This is the first report to demonstrate that S-649266, a novel siderophore cephalosporin, has significant antimicrobial activity against Enterobacteriaceae, including strains that produce carbapenemases such as KPC and NDM-1.

INTRODUCTION

According to a recent global report of the World Health Organization (WHO), antibiotic resistance is now defined as a major threat to public health (1). Frequent occurrences of resistance to third-generation cephalosporins and carbapenems are reported for Enterobacteriaceae especially in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, which have various antibiotic-resistant mechanisms, such as β-lactamases, decreased outer membrane permeability, efflux pumps, and target modification (2–7). Of these, distinct β-lactamases such as extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and carbapenemases are the most important resistance mechanisms that cause the greatest impact to public health (8, 9). As ESBLs confer resistance to penicillins, oxyimino-cephalosporins, and monobactams, treatment options for infections by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae are limited, even though β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (i.e., piperacillin-tazobactam), carbapenems, tigecycline, and colistin are available treatment options. Carbapenems, which show robust antimicrobial activity against ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, are considered a last-resort therapy, and there are concerns that their increased consumption will lead to the spread of carbapenem resistance (10).

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) have been identified in many countries. According to the 2013 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report on the threat of drug-resistant bacteria and the related statement of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), CRE have been recognized as a serious and emergent problem and are defined as an urgent risk (11, 12). The increase of CRE, such as KPC- or NDM-type carbapenemase-producing strains, is of great concern, as there are few antibiotics that are active against CRE. Therefore, there is an urgent need for novel antibiotics that are active against Enterobacteriaceae, including carbapenemase-producing strains.

S-649266 (see Fig. 1) is a new siderophore cephalosporin antibiotic with a catechol moiety on the 3-position side chain and binds mainly to PBP 3, which is similar to other cephalosporins (13). This catechol moiety contributes to potent antimicrobial activity against Gram-negative bacteria by functioning as a siderophore to form a chelating complex with ferric iron (14). As reported for other β-lactam antibiotics with iron chelating siderophore moiety, the enhanced antimicrobial activity is related to the active outer membrane transport into the periplasmic space where the β-lactam antibiotic efficiently inhibits cell wall synthesis (15–18). In addition, S-649266 is more stable against various β-lactamases, including KPC-3 and NDM-1 carbapenemases, than β-lactam agents such as cefepime (FEP) and meropenem (MEM) (19). In this study, the antimicrobial activities of S-649266 against a variety of Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates, including carbapenemase-producers, were examined.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Chemical structure of S-649266.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains.Two sets of strain collections, a total of 850 clinical Enterobacteriaceae isolates, were used to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of S-649266. The first set included 617 clinical isolates collected by International Health Management Associates (IMHA) (Schaumburg, IL) between 2009 and 2011. These isolates were obtained from the clinical specimens of hospitalized patients from diverse regions, including North America, Europe, Africa, Asia, Latin America, the South Pacific, and the Middle East. Each isolate was a unique, nonreplicate isolate, with no more than one isolate per patient represented. They consisted of 106 E. coli isolates, 105 K. pneumoniae isolates, 103 Serratia marcescens isolates, 100 Citrobacter freundii isolates, 100 Enterobacter aerogenes isolates, and 103 Enterobacter cloacae isolates. Another set included 233 strains collected by JMI Laboratories (North Liberty, IA) and IHMA, which were obtained from diverse regions, including North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America, between 2000 and 2009. These strains are characterized by their resistance to various β-lactam antibiotics with defined mechanisms related to the production of class A ESBL, noncarbapenemase OXA-type β-lactamases, or various types of carbapenemases. This set consisted of 78 E. coli strains, 81 K. pneumoniae strains, 20 S. marcescens strains, 9 C. freundii strains, and 45 E. cloacae strains. These strains included 129 carbapenemase-producing strains, consisting of 47 KPC-producing strains, 49 NDM-1-producing strains, 12 VIM-producing strains, 8 IMP-producing strains, 6 OXA-48-producing strains, 6 SME-producing strains, and 1 NMC-A-producing strain. There were 92 strains producing noncarbapenemase class A ESBLs, including 62 CTX-M types, 25 SHV types, 3 TEM types, 1 PER-2, and 1 GES-1. Finally, there were 12 strains that produced noncarbapenemase OXA-type β-lactamases.

MIC determination.MICs were determined by a broth microdilution method according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations; however, to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of S-649266, the cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) was supplemented with 20 μM human apo-transferrin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) (20). The apo-transferrin was added to mimic the ferric-iron-limiting condition in human biological fluids in which free iron is tightly bound to proteins such as transferrin (21). Determination of MIC values in iron-deficient conditions has been used to evaluate the activities of other siderophore antibiotics (14, 16, 17, 22). S-649266 was synthesized at Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). Other antimicrobial agents used in this study were obtained from U.S. Pharmacopeia (Rockville, MD) and include FEP, ceftazidime (CAZ), and MEM and from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO), including levofloxacin (LVX). FEP, CAZ, MEM, and LVX were used as reference compounds for MIC determinations against the first set of isolates, while FEP and MEM were used for MIC comparison against the second set of strains. All of the MIC values of the compounds except for S-649266 were measured by a broth microdilution method using CAMHB. The resistance breakpoints of these compounds were defined as recommended by CLSI—16 μg/ml for FEP and CAZ, 4 μg/ml for MEM, and 8 μg/ml for LVX (23).

RESULTS

Antimicrobial activity against global clinical isolates collected from 7 regions between 2009 and 2011.The MIC50, MIC90, and MIC ranges of S-649266 and the reference compounds against 617 global clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae collected from 2009 to 2011 are summarized in Table 1. The overall rates of resistance to FEP, CAZ, MEM, and LVX were 9.2%, 24.5%, 2.6%, and 13.3%, respectively. The MIC90 values of S-649266 against these 6 species were ≤1 μg/ml, and there were only 8 isolates (1.3%) among the 617 isolates tested with S-649266 MICs of ≥8 μg/ml. Among the 16 MEM-resistant isolates, 9 isolates (7 K. pneumoniae isolates, 1 E. aerogenes isolate, and 1 C. freundii isolate) were resistant to FEP and CAZ, and 2 isolates (2 E. aerogenes isolates) were resistant to only CAZ; all isolates showed MIC values to S-649266 of ≤2 μg/ml. The other 5 MEM-resistant isolates (5 S. marcescens isolates) were susceptible to S-649266 as well as to FEP and CAZ with MIC values ranging from ≤0.063 to 1 μg/ml. All of the 5 isolates of S. marcescens and the single isolates of C. freundii, E. aerogenes, and E. cloacae that showed S-649266 MICs of ≥8 μg/ml were resistant to FEP and CAZ but were susceptible to MEM, with the exception of 2 S. marcescens isolates where the FEP MIC values were 1 and 8 μg/ml. The MICs of LVX against the 8 isolates with S-649266 MICs of ≥8 μg/ml ranged from 0.125 to >8 μg/ml, and 4 of them (2 S. marcescens isolates, 1 C. freundii isolate, 1 E. cloacae isolate) were LVX-resistant isolates.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

MICs and resistance rates of S-649266 and other antimicrobial agents against 617 clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceaea

Antimicrobial activity against β-lactamase-producing strains.Since there were few multidrug-resistant strains in the first set of 617 clinical isolates, the second set was used to investigate the antimicrobial activity of S-649266 against various β-lactamase-producing strains, including carbapenemase-producing strains such as KPC- and NDM producers. The MIC distributions and resistance rates against each β-lactamase type by species of E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and other Enterobacteriaceae, including S. marcescens, C. freundii, and E. cloacae, are shown in Table 2. Most of the strains producing class A carbapenemase KPC and class B carbapenemases, such as NDM-1, VIM, and IMP, were resistant to MEM and FEP. On the other hand, S-649266 showed MIC values ranging from ≤0.125 to 4 μg/ml against all of the KPC-producing strains regardless of species. Also, the MIC values of S-649266 were ≤4 μg/ml against 62 of 69 class B carbapenemase-producing strains, including NDM-1, VIM, and IMP. Among these 233 clinical strains, only 7 strains showed an S-649266 MIC of ≥16 μg/ml; these included 5 NDM-1-producing E. coli strains, 1 IMP-1-producing S. marcescens strain, and 1 VIM-1-producing E. cloacae strain. Against class A carbapenemases-producing strains such as the 6 SME-producing S. marcescens strains and 1 NMC-A-producing E. cloacae strain, S-649266 and FEP showed MIC values of ≤0.25 μg/ml while the MIC values of MEM were ≥16 μg/ml. S-649266 also showed activity against class D carbapenemase OXA-48-producing strains of K. pneumoniae and E. cloacae with MIC values of ≤0.125 to 2 μg/ml. The cumulative distributions of the MIC values of S-649266, FEP, and MEM against all of the MEM-resistant carbapenemase-producing strains are summarized in Fig. 2. Against these strains, S-649266 showed antimicrobial activity with MIC50 and MIC90 values of 0.25 and 2 μg/ml, respectively, which were significantly lower than those of FEP and MEM (MIC50 and MIC90 values of these two antimicrobial agents were >16 μg/ml). Against the 92 ESBL-producing strains that were mainly CTX-M-type or SHV-type producers, the MIC values of S-649266 were ≤4 μg/ml, including 3 strains with MEM MIC values of ≥16 μg/ml. The MIC values of S-649266 against 12 strains producing OXA-type class D β-lactamases other than OXA-48 ranged from ≤0.125 to 0.5 μg/ml, while the MIC values of FEP ranged from 1 to >16 μg/ml.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

MIC distributions of S-649266, cefepime, and meropenem against various β-lactamase-producing strainsa

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Cumulative percentage of MICs against meropenem-resistant carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. The test strains were 110 E. coli, K. pneumoniae, S. marcescens, C. freundii, and E. cloacae isolates that consisted of 40 KPC-type-, 47 NDM-1-, 7 VIM-type-, 7 IMP-type-, 6 SME-type-, 1 NMC-A-, and 2 OXA-48-producing strains. Cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth was used as a medium, but 20 μM human apo-transferrin was supplemented for the MIC determination of S-649266 to obtain a free iron-deficient condition. The broken lines represent 50% and 90% lines.

DISCUSSION

The breadth of clinically relevant β-lactamase enzymes in a wide range of Enterobacteriaceae species continues to contribute to a growing global clinical challenge, where even drugs of last resort such as the carbapenems are no longer predictably reliable. S-649266 is a novel siderophore cephalosporin antibiotic with a catechol moiety on the 3-position side chain. The addition of the catechol moiety enables the active transport of S-649266 into bacterial cells via iron transport systems. This molecular technique of harnessing the cell's own essential survival mechanisms to increase the penetration of the antimicrobial agent has been described as a Trojan horse approach (14). Since the iron transporters are strongly regulated by the surrounding iron concentrations (24), the culture medium for the MIC determination of S-649266 was supplemented with an iron chelator (human apo-transferrin) to mimic the limited free iron condition present in human biological fluids (21).

In the first susceptibility study using 617 global clinical isolates, the resistance rates of CAZ, FEP, and MEM against Enterobacteriaceae isolates were similar to those recently reported in United States/North American and European surveillance studies where the resistance rates of CAZ, FEP, MEM, and LVX ranged from 9.3% to 21.4%, 6.0% to 14.9%, 1.5% to 2.6%, and 15.8% to 80.6%, respectively (25–27). Although the number of isolates used in our study was less than that of these large surveillance studies, S-649266 showed potent antimicrobial activity with MIC90 values of ≤1 μg/ml against clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae regardless of species.

With regard to the characterized β-lactamase-producing strains, S-649266 has excellent antimicrobial activity against problematic strains that produce carbapenemases such as KPC and class B metallo-β-lactamases, including NDM-1, as well as ESBL-producing strains. In addition to the novel mechanism of cell entry provided by the siderophore moiety, S-649266 has been found to be quite stable to various β-lactamases, including ESBLs and class B (NDM-1, VIM, and IMP) and class A (KPC, NMC, and SME) carbapenemases (19). To overcome the threat of KPC-producing CREs, novel β-lactamase inhibitors such as avibactam and RPX7009, broad-spectrum inhibitors for class A, C, and D β-lactamases, have been strategically selected for clinical development as combination therapy with β-lactam agents; however, these β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors do not have antimicrobial activity against strains producing class B β-lactamases such as NDM-1 (28). BAL30072, a siderophore-conjugated monosulfactam, displays antimicrobial activity against class B β-lactamase-producing strains, including P. aeruginosa, but BAL30072 shows weak antimicrobial activity against KPC-producing K. pneumoniae (29). Importantly, S-649266 showed potent antimicrobial activity against various types of carbapenemase-producing strains without the addition of a β-lactamase inhibitor.

Several strains with reduced susceptibility to S-649266 were found among the first set of global clinical isolates and among the second set of β-lactamase-producing strains tested. There were 5 NDM-1-producing E. coli strains with reduced susceptibility to S-649266, but most of the NDM-1-producing Enterobacteriaceae, including E. coli strains were susceptible to S-649266. The reason why some strains of NDM-1-producing E. coli strains have reduced susceptibility to S-649266 is unclear, but the deficiency or loss of the influx routes relating to iron transport systems may contribute to the reduced susceptibility to S-649266 as has been reported with other siderophore β-lactams (15, 18). These resistance mechanisms to S-649266 need to be evaluated in the further studies.

This study reveals the potent antimicrobial activity of S-649266 especially against many of the problematic multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. The striking features of S-649266 are the Trojan horse transport and the high stability against hydrolysis by β-lactamases, including ESBLs and carbapenemases (19). To better understand the relationship of MICs and efficacy, S-649266 has shown potent in vivo efficacy against ESBL-producing or KPC-producing strains in various animal infection models (30). In conclusion, S-649266 is a promising siderophore cephalosporin to treat bacterial infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae, including CRE such as KPC- and NDM-1-producing strains.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We declare no conflicts of interest.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 15 July 2015.
    • Returned for modification 11 August 2015.
    • Accepted 6 November 2015.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 16 November 2015.
  • Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    World Health Organization. 2014. Antimicrobial resistance global report on surveillance. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.thehealthwell.info/node/763364.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Babic M,
    2. Hujer AM,
    3. Bonomo RA
    . 2006. What's new in antibiotic resistance? Focus on beta-lactamases. Drug Resist Updat 9:142–156. doi:10.1016/j.drup.2006.05.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hopkins JM,
    2. Towner KJ
    . 1990. Enhanced resistance to cefotaxime and imipenem associated with outer membrane protein alterations in Enterobacter aerogenes. J Antimicrob Chemother 25:49–55. doi:10.1093/jac/25.1.49.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Jacoby GA,
    2. Mills DM,
    3. Chow N
    . 2004. Role of beta-lactamases and porins in resistance to ertapenem and other beta-lactams in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:3203–3206. doi:10.1128/AAC.48.8.3203-3206.2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Oteo J,
    2. Delgado-Iribarren A,
    3. Vega D,
    4. Bautista V,
    5. Rodriguez MC,
    6. Velasco M,
    7. Saavedra JM,
    8. Perez-Vazquez M,
    9. Garcia-Cobos S,
    10. Martinez-Martinez L,
    11. Campos J
    . 2008. Emergence of imipenem resistance in clinical Escherichia coli during therapy. Int J Antimicrob Agents 32:534–537. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.06.012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Poole K
    . 2004. Efflux-mediated multiresistance in Gram-negative bacteria. Clin Microbiol Infect 10:12–26. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.00763.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Yang YL,
    2. Lauderdale TL,
    3. Lo HJ
    . 2004. Molecular mechanisms of fluoroquinolone resistance in Klebsiella. Curr Drug Targets Infect Disord 4:295–302. doi:10.2174/1568005043340623.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Glasner C,
    2. Albiger B,
    3. Buist G,
    4. Tambić Andrasević A,
    5. Canton R,
    6. Carmeli Y,
    7. Friedrich AW,
    8. Giske CG,
    9. Glupczynski Y,
    10. Gniadkowski M,
    11. Livermore DM,
    12. Nordmann P,
    13. Poirel L,
    14. Rossolini GM,
    15. Seifert H,
    16. Vatopoulos A,
    17. Walsh T,
    18. Woodford N,
    19. Donker T,
    20. Monnet DL,
    21. Grundmann H, European Survey on Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae (EuSCAPE) Working Group
    . 2013. Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Europe: a survey among national experts from 39 countries, February 2013. Euro Surveill 18:pii=20525. http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20525.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Pitout JD,
    2. Laupland KB
    . 2008. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: an emerging public-health concern. Lancet Infect Dis 8:159–166. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70041-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Lee HS,
    2. Loh YX,
    3. Lee JJ,
    4. Liu CS,
    5. Chu C
    . 2014. Antimicrobial consumption and resistance in five Gram-negative bacterial species in a hospital from 2003 to 2011. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 48:647–654. doi:10.1016/j.jmii.2014.04.009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2013. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/.
  12. 12.↵
    European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. 2013. ECDC reviews-US CDC report on antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2013. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden. http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/activities/sciadvice/_layouts/forms/Review_DispForm.aspx?List=a3216f4c-f040-4f51-9f77-a96046dbfd72&ID=752.
  13. 13.↵
    1. Ito A,
    2. Nishikawa T,
    3. Oota M,
    4. Kanazawa S,
    5. Fukuhara N,
    6. Yamaguchi T,
    7. Nakamura R,
    8. Tsuji M,
    9. Yamano Y
    . 2015. S-649266, a novel siderophore cephalosporin: Binding affinity to PBP and bactericidal activity, abstr ECCMID-1871. Abstr 25th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.
  14. 14.↵
    1. Mollmann U,
    2. Heinisch L,
    3. Bauernfeind A,
    4. Kohler T,
    5. Ankel-Fuchs D
    . 2009. Siderophores as drug delivery agents: application of the “Trojan horse” strategy. Biometals 22:615–624. doi:10.1007/s10534-009-9219-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Ferguson AD,
    2. Deisenhofer J
    . 2004. Metal import through microbial membranes. Cell 116:15–24. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(03)01030-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. McPherson CJ,
    2. Aschenbrenner LM,
    3. Lacey BM,
    4. Fahnoe KC,
    5. Lemmon MM,
    6. Finegan SM,
    7. Tadakamalla B,
    8. O'Donnell JP,
    9. Mueller JP,
    10. Tomaras AP
    . 2012. Clinically relevant Gram-negative resistance mechanisms have no effect on the efficacy of MC-1, a novel siderophore-conjugated monocarbam. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:6334–6342. doi:10.1128/AAC.01345-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Page MG,
    2. Dantier C,
    3. Desarbre E
    . 2010. In vitro properties of BAL30072, a novel siderophore sulfactam with activity against multiresistant gram-negative bacilli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:2291–2302. doi:10.1128/AAC.01525-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Tatsumi Y,
    2. Maejima T,
    3. Mitsuhashi S
    . 1995. Mechanism of tonB-dependent transport of KP-736, a 1,5-dihydroxy-4-pyridone-substituted cephalosporin, into Escherichia coli K-12 cells. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 39:613–619. doi:10.1128/AAC.39.3.613.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Ishii Y,
    2. Tateda K,
    3. Horiyama T,
    4. Tsuji M,
    5. Yamano Y,
    6. Shimada J,
    7. Yamaguchi K
    . 2014. S-649266, a novel siderophore cephalosporin: III. Stability against clinically relevant β-lactamases, abstr F-1557. Abstr 54th Intersci Conf Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
  20. 20.↵
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2009. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard—8th ed. CLSI document M07-A8. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  21. 21.↵
    1. Bruhn KW,
    2. Spellberg B
    . 2015. Transferrin-mediated iron sequestration as a novel therapy for bacterial and fungal infections. Curr Opin Microbiol 27:57–61. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2015.07.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Gill AE,
    2. Taylor K,
    3. Lewendon A,
    4. Unemi N,
    5. Uji T,
    6. Nishida K,
    7. Salama S,
    8. Singh R,
    9. Micetich RG
    . 2003. Comparative in vitro activity of PTX2416, a dihydroxypyridone monobactam, against Gram-negative clinical isolates, abstr F-552. Abstr 43rd Intersci Conf Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
  23. 23.↵
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2015. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 25th informational supplement. CLSI M100-S25. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  24. 24.↵
    1. Curtis NA,
    2. Eisenstadt RL,
    3. East SJ,
    4. Cornford RJ,
    5. Walker LA,
    6. White AJ
    . 1988. Iron-regulated outer membrane proteins of Escherichia coli K-12 and mechanism of action of catechol-substituted cephalosporins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 32:1879–1886. doi:10.1128/AAC.32.12.1879.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Biedenbach DJ,
    2. Kazmierczak K,
    3. Bouchillon SK,
    4. Sahm DF,
    5. Bradford PA
    . 2015. In vitro activity of aztreonam-avibactam against a global collection of Gram-negative pathogens from 2012 and 2013. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:4239–4248. doi:10.1128/AAC.00206-15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Castanheira M,
    2. Mills JC,
    3. Costello SE,
    4. Jones RN,
    5. Sader HS
    . 2015. Ceftazidime-avibactam activity tested against Enterobacteriaceae isolates from U.S. hospitals (2011 to 2013) and characterization of beta-lactamase-producing strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:3509–3517. doi:10.1128/AAC.00163-15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Sader HS,
    2. Castanheira M,
    3. Flamm RK,
    4. Mendes RE,
    5. Farrell DJ,
    6. Jones RN
    . 2015. Tigecycline activity tested against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae from 18 European nations: results from the SENTRY surveillance program (2010-2013). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 83:183–186. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.06.011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Butler MS,
    2. Blaskovich MA,
    3. Cooper MA
    . 2013. Antibiotics in the clinical pipeline in 2013. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 66:571–591. doi:10.1038/ja.2013.86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Landman D,
    2. Singh M,
    3. El-Imad B,
    4. Miller E,
    5. Win T,
    6. Quale J
    . 2014. In vitro activity of the siderophore monosulfactam BAL30072 against contemporary Gram-negative pathogens from New York City, including multidrug-resistant isolates. Int J Antimicrob Agents 43:527–532. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.02.017.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Nakamura R,
    2. Toba S,
    3. Tsuji M,
    4. Yamano Y,
    5. Shimada J
    . 2014. S-649266, a novel siderophore cephalosporin: IV. In vivo efficacy in various murine infection models, abstr F-1558. Abstr 54th Intersci Conf Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of a Siderophore Cephalosporin, S-649266, against Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Isolates, Including Carbapenem-Resistant Strains
Naoki Kohira, Joshua West, Akinobu Ito, Tsukasa Ito-Horiyama, Rio Nakamura, Takafumi Sato, Stephen Rittenhouse, Masakatsu Tsuji, Yoshinori Yamano
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jan 2016, 60 (2) 729-734; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01695-15

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of a Siderophore Cephalosporin, S-649266, against Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Isolates, Including Carbapenem-Resistant Strains
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of a Siderophore Cephalosporin, S-649266, against Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Isolates, Including Carbapenem-Resistant Strains
Naoki Kohira, Joshua West, Akinobu Ito, Tsukasa Ito-Horiyama, Rio Nakamura, Takafumi Sato, Stephen Rittenhouse, Masakatsu Tsuji, Yoshinori Yamano
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jan 2016, 60 (2) 729-734; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01695-15
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596