Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mechanisms of Resistance

CTX-M-190, a Novel β-Lactamase Resistant to Tazobactam and Sulbactam, Identified in an Escherichia coli Clinical Isolate

Zhen Shen, Baixing Ding, Yingmin Bi, Shi Wu, Su Xu, Xiaogang Xu, Qinglan Guo, Minggui Wang
Zhen Shen
aInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
bKey Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Baixing Ding
aInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
bKey Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yingmin Bi
aInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
bKey Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shi Wu
aInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
bKey Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Su Xu
aInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
bKey Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaogang Xu
aInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
bKey Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qinglan Guo
aInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
bKey Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Qinglan Guo
Minggui Wang
aInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
bKey Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01848-16
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

A novel β-lactamase, CTX-M-190, derived from CTX-M-55 by a single substitution of Ser for Thr at position 133 (Ser133Thr), was identified in a natural Escherichia coli clinical isolate. CTX-M-190 exhibited potent hydrolytic activity against cefotaxime, with a kcat/Km ratio of 14.5 μM−1 s−1, and was highly resistant to inhibition by the β-lactamase inhibitors tazobactam and sulbactam, whose 50% inhibitory concentrations were 77- and 55-fold higher, respectively, for CTX-M-190 than for CTX-M-55. blaCTX-M-190 was located within the genetic platform ISEcp1-blaCTX-M-orf477, which was harbored by a 70-kb IncI1 plasmid.

INTRODUCTION

The high prevalence of CTX-M extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) genes in Enterobacteriaceae, particularly in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, has been documented worldwide (1, 2). Since CTX-M-producing Enterobacteriaceae often confer resistance to many other antimicrobial agents, they constitute one of the most worrying problems in modern medical practice (2, 3). On the basis of the available evidence, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs), such as piperacillin-tazobactam, remain active in vitro against a high proportion of CTX-M-producing Enterobacteriaceae and may provide a reasonable carbapenem-sparing option for ESBL producers (4). A recent surveillance program conducted across China, which included 196 ESBL-producing E. coli and 124 ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae strains, found blaCTX-M occurrence in 99.5% of E. coli strains and 91.1% of K. pneumoniae strains and indicated resistance rates of 2.6% and 4.8% to piperacillin-tazobactam in these two kinds of ESBL producers (5). BLBLI resistance in CTX-M-producing Enterobacteriaceae is frequently associated with the coexistence of OXA-1 β-lactamases (6), whereas no natural CTX-M variants have been reported to confer resistance to BLBLIs.

Isolation of a clinical E. coli strain resistant to piperacillin-tazobactam.A clinical strain of E. coli HS37 was isolated from a urine specimen of a 56-year-old female outpatient with urinary tract infection in July 2015 at a university hospital in Shanghai, China. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)-recommended double-disk synergy test confirmed the production of an ESBL by this isolate (7), while it displayed resistance to both piperacillin-tazobactam and ampicillin-sulbactam. The presence of a CTX-M-like β-lactamase in E. coli strain HS37 was confirmed by CTX-M-1 group-specific PCR and sequencing as previously described (8). The new CTX-M-1 group β-lactamase was derived from CTX-M-55 by a single substitution of Ser for Thr at position 133 (Ser133Thr) and was designated CTX-M-190 (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Amino acid alterations of CTX-M-190 and IC50s of tazobactam, sulbactam, and clavulanate for CTX-M-15, CTX-M-55, and CTX-M-190

Cloning of blaCTX-M-190.Plasmid DNA was extracted from HS37 with the Qiagen plasmid midikit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and was introduced by electroporation into E. coli strain DH5α (Tiangen, Beijing, China). Transformants harboring the plasmid with blaCTX-M-190 (pHS37) were selected on LB agar containing 50 μg/ml of ampicillin through specific PCR screening. E. coli DH5α clones producing CTX-M-190, CTX-M-55, and CTX-M-15 were obtained using the cloning vector pHSG396 (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), with PCR carried out using primers C1-BamHI-F (5′-CGGGATCCATGGTTAAAAAATCACTGCG-3′) and C1-EcoRI-R (5′-CGGAATTCTTACAAACCGTCGGTGACGAT-3′), containing BamHI and EcoRI restriction sites and protective bases (indicated by underlining). PCR was performed with HS37 and other E. coli isolates that had been confirmed to produce CTX-M-55 or CTX-M-15. PCR products were purified with the TIANquick mini-purification kit (TIAGEN, Beijing, China), digested with BamHI and EcoRI (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), and then ligated into a BamHI-EcoRI-digested pHSG396 vector, which was then introduced by electroporation into E. coli DH5α. Transformants harboring the recombinant plasmids were selected on LB agar containing 50 μg/ml of chloramphenicol and were confirmed through PCR screening with the pair of cloning primers mentioned above.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for clinical isolate HS37, the corresponding DH5α transformant, and CTX-M-producing DH5α clones was performed by the CLSI reference broth microdilution method (7). The MICs are presented in Table 2. E. coli HS37, the corresponding pHS37 transformant, and CTX-M-190- and CTX-M-55-producing DH5α clones all were resistant to penicillins (ampicillin, amoxicillin, and piperacillin) and cephalosporins (cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and cefepime), except that the CTX-M-55-producing DH5α clone was intermediate to cefepime, while all strains were susceptible to cefoxitin, imipenem, and ertapenem.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

MICs for the clinical isolate HS37, the corresponding DH5α transformant, and CTX-M-producing DH5α clones

Interestingly, tazobactam and sulbactam did not restore the susceptibility of E. coli HS37, the corresponding pHS37 transformant, and the CTX-M-190-producing DH5α clone to penicillins, and their MICs of piperacillin-tazobactam and ampicillin-sulbactam were 8- to 32-fold higher than those of the CTX-M-55- and CTX-M-15-producing clones (Table 2). In contrast, clavulanate did significantly reduce the MICs of amoxicillin, ceftazidime, and cefotaxime in E. coli HS37 and all of the DH5α clones.

Fifty-percent inhibitory concentration (IC50) determination and β-lactamase kinetic analysis.Recombinant pET28a(+) (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany) expression derivatives were constructed for CTX-M-190, CTX-M-55, and CTX-M-15 β-lactamases. The above-mentioned BamHI-EcoRI-digested PCR products were ligated into a BamHI-EcoRI-digested pET28a(+) expression vector, which was then introduced by electroporation into E. coli BL21(DE3) (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany). The expression of the three kinds of CTX-M β-lactamases was induced by 0.75 mM IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside) as previously described (9), and proteins were purified by using nickel magnetic beads for His tag protein purification (Biotool, Houston, TX, USA), following the manufacturer's instructions. Purity was confirmed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis.

The concentration of each β-lactamase inhibitor required to attain 50% enzyme inhibition (IC50) was determined after incubation of the purified CTX-M enzymes and inhibitors for 10 min at 30°C. The reporter substrate was ampicillin, which was used at a concentration of 100 μM (10). The IC50s of tazobactam and sulbactam for CTX-M-190 were 77- and 55-fold higher than those of CTX-M-55 (Table 1). In contrast, CTX-M-190 shared a similar IC50 for clavulanate with CTX-M-55, and the IC50 of clavulanate for CTX-M-190 was sevenfold lower than that of CTX-M-15.

The wild-type CTX-M-190 and CTX-M-55 β-lactamases, each with a molecular mass of 32.7-kDa by mass spectrometry analysis, were obtained after thrombin digestion for His tag removal. The hydrolysis of β-lactam compounds by CTX-M-190 and CTX-M-55 was monitored by absorbance variation at the appropriate wavelengths in phosphate-buffered saline (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 1.8 mM KH2PO4, 10 mM Na2HPO4) at 30°C using a UV-2700 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), and steady-state kinetic parameters (Km, kcat, and kcat/Km) were determined as previously described (9, 10). As shown by the results in Table 3, the highest catalytic efficiency of CTX-M-190 was observed toward ampicillin and cefotaxime, with kcat/Km ratios of 2.2 and 14.5 μM−1 s−1, respectively. For cefepime, the kcat/Km value of CTX-M-190 was eightfold higher than that of CTX-M-55, indicating that CTX-M-190 might have an elevated hydrolytic activity toward cefepime.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Kinetic parameters of CTX-M-190 and CTX-M-55a

Genetic environments of blaCTX-M-190.The plasmid profiles of E. coli HS37 and the transformants were determined by S1 nuclease pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and plasmid pHS37 was characterized by PCR-based replicon typing (11). E. coli HS37 only had a single 70-kb plasmid, which was characterized as an IncI1 type. PCR screening revealed that only blaTEM-1 and blaCTX-M-190 were found on pHS37, as well as E. coli HS37. pHS37 is a self-transferable plasmid, and the frequency of conjugation was approximately 10−3 recombinants per donor cell (E. coli strain J53). pHS37 was extracted from the DH5α transformant with the Qiagen plasmid midikit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and the genetic environment around blaCTX-M-190 was determined through primer-walking sequencing. Just like other CTX-M-1 group β-lactamase genes, blaCTX-M-190 was located within the classical genetic platform, ISEcp1-blaCTX-M-orf477 (12). ISEcp1 is composed of an open reading frame (orf) encoding a transposase with 420 amino acids and two imperfect and inverted repeats, while orf477 encodes a protein of 110 amino acids with unknown function (12).

Here, we report a novel CTX-M β-lactamase, CTX-M-190, which displayed resistance to inhibition by tazobactam and sulbactam and retained hydrolytic activity against expanded-spectrum cephalosporins. As irreversible “suicide inhibitors,” clavulanate, sulbactam, and tazobactam exert their inhibitive effects by following similar reaction pathways, beginning with the formation of an acyl enzyme species and then proceeding to the formation of transient imine or enamine intermediates (13). Depending on the properties of the β-lactamase and inhibitor, the reaction will ultimately proceed to deacylation or irreversible inactivation (13). Ser133 is a conserved amino acid among all class A β-lactamases, and it also serves as a second nucleophile which attacks the transient intermediates and becomes covalently cross-linked to Ser70 in the terminal inactivation of the mechanism-based inhibitors (14). The specific substitution in CTX-M-190, Ser133Thr, may bring about structural changes that discourage the formation of the acyl enzyme complex or reduce the stability of the intermediate species with sulbactam or tazobactam and, thus, lead to deacylation and regeneration of the active CTX-M-190 β-lactamase.

Unlike the previously reported inhibitor-resistant TEM and SHV enzymes, which are typically most resistant to inhibition by clavulanate and sulbactam (13), CTX-M-190 was resistant to inhibition by tazobactam, showing a different and distinctive pattern. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a CTX-M β-lactamase with resistance to inhibition by tazobactam and sulbactam in a natural clinical isolate. CTX-M-190 may foreshadow the emergence of a new class of versatile β-lactamases with even broader hydrolytic and resistance profiles.

Previous studies demonstrated that β-lactamases from all CTX-M groups were able to acquire mutations reducing BLBLI susceptibility upon exposure to BLBLIs (15). An interesting question is why natural inhibitor-resistant CTX-M variants have not previously been described in clinical isolates. It has been suspected that the phenotypic patterns shown by the inhibitor-resistant CTX-M variants might be obscured by the more common inhibitor-resistant TEM enzymes or the coproduction of other β-lactamases, as their lack of detection might be more a methodological issue than a real absence in clinical strains (16). The emergence of CTX-M-190 highlights the ongoing and complex evolution of CTX-M β-lactamases.

Accession number(s).The nucleotide sequence of the blaCTX-M-190 gene is available in GenBank under accession number KX664469 .

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank George Jacoby for his critical review of the manuscript.

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 81120108024 and 81473250). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 24 August 2016.
    • Returned for modification 20 September 2016.
    • Accepted 2 November 2016.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 7 November 2016.
  • Copyright © 2016 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved .

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. D'Andrea MM,
    2. Arena F,
    3. Pallecchi L,
    4. Rossolini GM
    . 2013. CTX-M-type β-lactamases: a successful story of antibiotic resistance. Int J Med Microbiol303:1–5. doi:10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.02.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Mathers AJ,
    2. Peirano G,
    3. Pitout JD
    . 2015. The role of epidemic resistance plasmids and international high-risk clones in the spread of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Clin Microbiol Rev28:565–591. doi:10.1128/CMR.00116-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Pitout JD,
    2. Laupland KB
    . 2008. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: an emerging public-health concern. Lancet Infect Dis8:159–166. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70041-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Harris PN,
    2. Tambyah PA,
    3. Paterson DL
    . 2015. β-Lactam and β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in the treatment of extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae: time for a reappraisal in the era of few antibiotic options?Lancet Infect Dis15:475–485. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70950-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Yang Q,
    2. Zhang H,
    3. Cheng J,
    4. Xu Z,
    5. Xu Y,
    6. Cao B,
    7. Kong H,
    8. Ni Y,
    9. Yu Y,
    10. Sun Z,
    11. Hu B,
    12. Huang W,
    13. Wang Y,
    14. Wu A,
    15. Feng X,
    16. Liao K,
    17. Shen D,
    18. Hu Z,
    19. Chu Y,
    20. Lu J,
    21. Su J,
    22. Gui B,
    23. Duan Q,
    24. Zhang S,
    25. Shao H
    . 2015. In vitro activity of flomoxef and comparators against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Proteus mirabilis producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases in China. Int J Antimicrob Agents45:485–490. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.11.012.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Woodford N,
    2. Carattoli A,
    3. Karisik E,
    4. Underwood A,
    5. Ellington MJ,
    6. Livermore DM
    . 2009. Complete nucleotide sequences of plasmids pEK204, pEK499, and pEK516, encoding CTX-M enzymes in three major Escherichia coli lineages from the United Kingdom, all belonging to the international O25:H4-ST131 clone. Antimicrob Agents Chemother53:4472–4482. doi:10.1128/AAC.00688-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2015. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard,10th ed. CLSI document M07-A10. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute,Wayne, PA.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Matsumura Y,
    2. Johnson JR,
    3. Yamamoto M,
    4. Nagao M,
    5. Tanaka M,
    6. Takakura S,
    7. Ichiyama S
    ,Kyoto–Shiga Clinical Microbiology Study Group; Kyoto-Shiga Clinical Microbiology Study Group. 2015. CTX-M-27- and CTX-M-14-producing, ciprofloxacin-resistant Escherichia coli of the H30 subclonal group within ST131 drive a Japanese regional ESBL epidemic. J Antimicrob Chemother70:1639–1649. doi:10.1093/jac/dkv017.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Robin F,
    2. Delmas J,
    3. Machado E,
    4. Bouchon B,
    5. Peixe L,
    6. Bonnet R
    . 2011. Characterization of the novel CMT enzyme TEM-154. Antimicrob Agents Chemother55:1262–1265. doi:10.1128/AAC.01359-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Tian GB,
    2. Huang YM,
    3. Fang ZL,
    4. Qing Y,
    5. Zhang XF,
    6. Huang X
    . 2014. CTX-M-137, a hybrid of CTX-M-14-like and CTX-M-15-like β-lactamases identified in an Escherichia coli clinical isolate. J Antimicrob Chemother69:2081–2085. doi:10.1093/jac/dku126.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Carattoli A,
    2. Bertini A,
    3. Villa L,
    4. Falbo V,
    5. Hopkins KL,
    6. Threlfall EJ
    . 2005. Identification of plasmids by PCR-based replicon typing. J Microbiol Methods63:219–228. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2005.03.018.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Zhao WH,
    2. Hu ZQ
    . 2013. Epidemiology and genetics of CTX-M extended-spectrum β-lactamases in Gram-negative bacteria. Crit Rev Microbiol39:79–101. doi:10.3109/1040841X.2012.691460.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Drawz SM,
    2. Bonomo RA
    . 2010. Three decades of β-lactamase inhibitors. Clin Microbiol Rev23:160–201. doi:10.1128/CMR.00037-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Kuzin AP,
    2. Nukaga M,
    3. Nukaga Y,
    4. Hujer A,
    5. Bonomo RA,
    6. Knox JR
    . 2001. Inhibition of the SHV-1 β-lactamase by sulfones: crystallographic observation of two reaction intermediates with tazobactam. Biochemistry40:1861–1866. doi:10.1021/bi0022745.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Ripoll A,
    2. Baquero F,
    3. Novais A,
    4. Rodriguez-Dominguez MJ,
    5. Turrientes MC,
    6. Canton R,
    7. Galan JC
    . 2011. In vitro selection of variants resistant to β-lactams plus β-lactamase inhibitors in CTX-M β-lactamases: predicting the in vivo scenario?Antimicrob Agents Chemother55:4530–4536. doi:10.1128/AAC.00178-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Ripoll A,
    2. Galan JC,
    3. Rodriguez C,
    4. Tormo N,
    5. Gimeno C,
    6. Baquero F,
    7. Martinez-Martinez L,
    8. Canton R
    . 2014. Detection of resistance to β-lactamase inhibitors in strains with CTX-M β-lactamases: a multicenter external proficiency study using a well-defined collection of Escherichia coli strains. J Clin Microbiol52:122–129. doi:10.1128/JCM.02340-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
CTX-M-190, a Novel β-Lactamase Resistant to Tazobactam and Sulbactam, Identified in an Escherichia coli Clinical Isolate
Zhen Shen, Baixing Ding, Yingmin Bi, Shi Wu, Su Xu, Xiaogang Xu, Qinglan Guo, Minggui Wang
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Dec 2016, 61 (1) e01848-16; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01848-16

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CTX-M-190, a Novel β-Lactamase Resistant to Tazobactam and Sulbactam, Identified in an Escherichia coli Clinical Isolate
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
CTX-M-190, a Novel β-Lactamase Resistant to Tazobactam and Sulbactam, Identified in an Escherichia coli Clinical Isolate
Zhen Shen, Baixing Ding, Yingmin Bi, Shi Wu, Su Xu, Xiaogang Xu, Qinglan Guo, Minggui Wang
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Dec 2016, 61 (1) e01848-16; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01848-16
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Anti-Bacterial Agents
cefotaxime
Escherichia coli
plasmids
beta-lactam resistance
beta-lactamases
Escherichia coli
inhibitor-resistant β-lactamase
CTX-M-190
tazobactam
sulbactam

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596