Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Pharmacology

In Vivo Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of ZTI-01 (Fosfomycin for Injection) in the Neutropenic Murine Thigh Infection Model against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Alexander J. Lepak, Miao Zhao, Brian VanScoy, Daniel S. Taylor, Evelyn Ellis-Grosse, Paul G. Ambrose, David R. Andes
Alexander J. Lepak
aDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miao Zhao
aDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
bDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
cWilliam S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian VanScoy
dInstitute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Schenectady, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel S. Taylor
dInstitute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Schenectady, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Evelyn Ellis-Grosse
eZavante Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul G. Ambrose
dInstitute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Schenectady, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David R. Andes
aDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
bDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
cWilliam S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00476-17
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    Single-dose plasma pharmacokinetics of fosfomycin after subcutaneous administration in groups of three infected mice per dose and time point. The error bars represent the standard deviation. Pharmacokinetic parameters listed in the box include maximum drug concentrations (Cmax), the AUC from 0 to infinity (AUC), and elimination half-life (T1/2) for each dose.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    Impact of pharmacodynamic regression of the in vivo dose fractionation study with fosfomycin against E. coli 1-741-1. Each symbol represents the mean from four thighs. The dose data are expressed as either AUC/MIC ratio (A), Cmax/MIC (B), or percent time that drug concentrations exceed the MIC over the dosing period (time above MIC [%]) (C). The R2 represents the coefficient of determination. The ED50 represents the PD index associated with 50% of the maximal effect (Emax), and N is the slope of the relationship or the Hill coefficient. The line drawn through the data points is the best-fit line based upon the sigmoid Emax formula. The horizontal dashed line at 0 represents the burden of organisms in the thighs of mice at the start of therapy. Data points below the line represent killing, and points above the line represent growth.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    Dose-response curves (A) and 24-h AUC/MIC ratio in relation to treatment effect (B) against five select E. coli strains using a neutropenic mouse thigh model. Each symbol represents the mean from four thighs. The horizontal dashed line at 0 represents the burden of organisms in the thighs of mice at the start of therapy. Data points below the line represent killing, and points above the line represent growth. The R2 represents the coefficient of determination. The ED50 represents the AUC/MIC ratio associated with 50% of the maximal effect (Emax), and N is the slope of the relationship or the Hill coefficient. The line drawn through the data points is the best-fit line based upon the sigmoid Emax formula.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    The dose-response curves (A) and 24-h AUC/MIC ratio in relation to treatment effect (B) against three select K. pneumoniae strains using a neutropenic mouse thigh model. Each symbol represents the mean from four thighs. The horizontal dashed line at 0 represents the burden of organisms in the thighs of mice at the start of therapy. Data points below the line represent killing, and points above the line represent growth. The R2 represents the coefficient of determination. The ED50 represents the AUC/MIC ratio associated with 50% of the maximal effect (Emax), and N is the slope of the relationship or the Hill coefficient. The line drawn through the data points is the best-fit line based upon the sigmoid Emax formula.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    The dose-response curves (A) and 24-h AUC/MIC ratio in relation to treatment effect (B) against two select P. aeruginosa strains using a neutropenic mouse thigh model. Each symbol represents the mean from four thighs. The horizontal dashed line at 0 represents the burden of organisms in the thighs of mice at the start of therapy. Data points below the line represent killing, and points above the line represent growth. The R2 represents the coefficient of determination. The ED50 represents the AUC/MIC ratio associated with 50% of the maximal effect (Emax), and N is the slope of the relationship or the Hill coefficient. The line drawn through the data points is the best-fit line based upon the sigmoid Emax formula.

  • FIG 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6

    Relationship between the PD index AUC/MIC ratio and treatment efficacy of fosfomycin against all 10 isolates using a neutropenic mouse thigh model. The horizontal line at 0 represents the burden of organisms in the thighs of mice at the start of therapy. Data points below the line represent killing, and points above the line represent growth. The R2 represents the coefficient of determination. The ED50 represents 50% of the maximal effect (Emax), and N is the slope of the relationship or the Hill coefficient. The line drawn through the data points is the best-fit line based upon the sigmoid Emax formula.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1

    In vitro activity of fosfomycin against select study strains

    StrainFosfomycin MIC by agar dilution (mg/liter)Resistance mechanism
    E. coli
        ATCC 259221
        1-741-11ESBL+
        68116ESBL+
        60428ESBL+
        1452ESBL+
    K. pneumoniae
        702316KPC-3
        70688
        70404NDM-1
    P. aeruginosa
        ATCC 278538
        900216
  • TABLE 2

    In vitro and in vivo efficacy of fosfomycin against E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa

    Organism group, strain, and/or parameterControl growth (log10 CFU/ml)MIC (mg/liter)Static dose (mg/kg/24 h)24-h static dose AUC/MIC ratioStatic dose time above MIC (%)1-log kill dose (mg/kg/24 h)24-h 1-log kill AUC/MIC ratio1-log kill dose time above MIC (%)
    E. coli
        1452.31297.219.341.434827.551.9
        6812.52163,30518.937.7NAa
        60421.8184918.515.03,57241.675.9
        ATCC 259222.15125649.467.51,644193100
        1-741-12.57186.322.431.41,37213374.8
        Mean 84723.738.61,73498.975.8
        Median 25619.337.71,50887.575.3
        SD 1,38315.319.11,34678.419.9
    K. pneumoniae
        70231.265161,1228.6112.8NA
        70681.8,37583,70743.678.0NA
        70401.25417111.126.565221.542.6
        Mean 1,66721.139.1
        Median 1,12211.126.5
        SD 1,83019.534.4
    Enterobacteriaceae group
        Mean 1,15422.738.81,51883.369.0
        Median 37419.134.61,37241.674.8
        SD 1,49415.623.41,26276.122.5
    P. aeruginosa
        ATCC 278533.42869211.322.51,00415.630.9
        90023.52163,14817.935.46,31040.876.4
    • ↵a NA, not achieved.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
In Vivo Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of ZTI-01 (Fosfomycin for Injection) in the Neutropenic Murine Thigh Infection Model against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Alexander J. Lepak, Miao Zhao, Brian VanScoy, Daniel S. Taylor, Evelyn Ellis-Grosse, Paul G. Ambrose, David R. Andes
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy May 2017, 61 (6) e00476-17; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00476-17

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Vivo Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of ZTI-01 (Fosfomycin for Injection) in the Neutropenic Murine Thigh Infection Model against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
In Vivo Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of ZTI-01 (Fosfomycin for Injection) in the Neutropenic Murine Thigh Infection Model against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Alexander J. Lepak, Miao Zhao, Brian VanScoy, Daniel S. Taylor, Evelyn Ellis-Grosse, Paul G. Ambrose, David R. Andes
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy May 2017, 61 (6) e00476-17; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00476-17
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Escherichia coli
fosfomycin
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Thigh
fosfomycin
PK/PD

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596