Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Clinical Therapeutics

In Vitro Discordance with In Vivo Activity: Humanized Exposures of Ceftazidime-Avibactam, Aztreonam, and Tigecycline Alone and in Combination against New Delhi Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Murine Lung Infection Model

M. L. Monogue, L. M. Abbo, R. Rosa, J. F. Camargo, O. Martinez, R. A. Bonomo, D. P. Nicolau
M. L. Monogue
aCenter for Anti-infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. M. Abbo
bDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
cDivision of Infectious Diseases, Jackson Health System, Miami, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Rosa
cDivision of Infectious Diseases, Jackson Health System, Miami, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. F. Camargo
bDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
O. Martinez
dDepartment of Pathology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. A. Bonomo
eLouis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
fDepartments of Medicine, Pharmacology, Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Biochemistry, and Proteomics and Bioinformatics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. P. Nicolau
aCenter for Anti-infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
gDivision of Infectious Diseases, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00486-17
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The management of infections with New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-1 (NDM)-producing bacteria remains clinically challenging given the multidrug resistant (MDR) phenotype associated with these bacteria. Despite resistance in vitro, ceftazidime-avibactam previously demonstrated in vivo activity against NDM-positive Enterobacteriaceae. Herein, we observed in vitro synergy with ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam against an MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae harboring NDM. In vivo, humanized doses of ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy resulted in >2 log10 CFU bacterial reduction; therefore, no in vivo synergy was observed.

TEXT

New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM) is a carbapenemase that efficiently hydrolyzes carbapenems and other β-lactams (1). As the prevalence of NDM carbapenemases continues to rise globally, effective antibiotic therapy is limited, increasing the demand for novel antimicrobials and synergistic combinations (2). Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is novel non-β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor-cephalosporin combination, which is shown to be stable in vitro against Ambler class A and C (and some class D) β-lactamases; yet, against NDM-producing organisms, the antibiotic often displays resistant MICs (3). However, the expression of the NDM in vivo was shown to be unremarkable against CZA, previously demonstrating antibacterial activity independent of high MICs in a murine thigh infection model (4). Other antimicrobials with potential in vivo activity are tigecycline, given its in vitro susceptibility to the organism of interest, and aztreonam (ATM), which is not hydrolyzed by NDM (5).

Humanized doses of tigecycline (lot AJP312; Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Dallas, TX) of 50 mg every 12 h (q12h) and 100 mg q12h, ATM (lot 6010677; Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC., Lake Zurich, IL) of 2 g q6h, and CZA (lot V005; GlaxoSmithKline, Verona, Italy; and lot 150901; Tecoland Corp., Irvine, CA) of 2.5 g q8h were prepared to produce exposures consistent with previously published data for each agent (6–8).

One Klebsiella pneumoniae strain provided by Jackson Health System in Miami, FL, was selected for this study. Previous molecular characterizations of the K. pneumoniae isolate revealed blaNDM, blaOXA-48, and blaCTX-M expression (9). MICs for CZA, tigecycline, and ATM were initially determined using Etest strips on inoculated Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Comparator antibiotic MICs, as well as those for CZA, tigecycline, and ATM, were subsequently confirmed in triplicates via broth microdilution according to the 2016 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (10). For synergy testing, the combinations of Etest strips were placed on the same culture medium in a cross formation, with a 90° angle at the intersection between the scales at the respective MICs for K. pneumoniae, and the plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The MICs were interpreted at the point of intersection between the inhibition zone and the Etest strip (9, 10). The fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index (ΣFIC) was calculated on the basis of the resultant zone of inhibition as follows: ΣFIC = FIC A + FIC B, where FIC A is the MIC of the combination/MIC of drug A alone, and FIC B is the MIC of the combination/MIC of drug B alone (11).

In the neutropenic lung model, specific-pathogen-free female ICR (CD-1) mice weighing 20 to 22 g were obtained from Envigo RMS, Inc. (Indianapolis, IN). The protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT. A bacterial suspension of approximately 107 CFU/ml was made for the inoculations. Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane and inoculated with 0.05 ml of the infecting K. pneumoniae isolate in 3% porcine stomach mucin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). The inoculum was administered into the nares of the mice using a pipette with an appropriate tip attached.

Two hours postinfection, groups of six mice received human simulated regimens of CZA, ATM, and tigecycline alone and in combination administered as 0.2-ml subcutaneous injections. Control animals (24 h) received 0.2 ml of 0.9% normal saline solution subcutaneously in a frequency identical to the most frequently dosed drug regimen. After sacrifice, lungs were aseptically harvested, rinsed with normal saline, and then homogenized in 1.0 ml of normal saline. Serial dilutions of lung homogenate were plated onto Trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood (BD Biosciences, Sparks, MD) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The change in bacterial density was calculated as the difference in log10 CFU from the antibiotic-treated mice after 24 h from the level in the 0-h control animals. Synergy was defined as a ≥2-log10 drop in CFU/ml from the count obtained with the more active agent at 24 h (12).

The molecular characteristics of K. pneumoniae strain 518 were NDM, OXA-48, and CTX-M positive. This strain demonstrated resistance to all antimicrobials tested, with the exception of tigecycline (MIC, 1 μg/ml), with MICs of >64 μg/ml for ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, and tobramycin, MICs of >16 μg/ml for ciprofloxacin, colistin, and ertapenem, and MICs of >512 μg/ml for amikacin, 64 μg/ml for aztreonam, >128/4 μg/ml for ceftazidime-avibactam, >64/4 μg/ml for ceftolozane-tazobactam, and >256/4 μg/ml for piperacillin-tazobactam. Figure 1 demonstrates K. pneumoniae 518 Etest MICs for CZA, tigecycline, and ATM before synergy testing. Etest MICs were ≥256, 1, and ≥256 μg/ml for CZA, tigecycline, and ATM, respectively. Figure 2 shows in vitro synergy between CZA and ATM (ΣFIC < 0.5), but not between CZA and tigecycline.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

K. pneumoniae 518 MIC determinations for ceftazidime-avibactam (A), tigecycline (B), and aztreonam (C).

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

K. pneumoniae 518 synergy interpretations for ceftazidime-avibactam and tigecycline (A) and ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam (B).

Figure 3 illustrates the antibacterial efficacy of human simulated doses of CZA, aztreonam, tigecycline 50 mg (50 mg q12h), and tigecycline 100 mg (100 mg q12h) alone and in combination against K. pneumoniae 518. For K. pneumoniae 518, the bacterial density increased by 2.66 log10 CFU in control animals at 24 h. CZA alone produced a 2.43-log10 CFU reduction at 24 h. When administered with aztreonam, the log10 CFU reduction increased to 2.54. CZA plus tigecycline 100 mg or CZA plus tigecycline 100 mg plus ATM did not improve bacterial reduction compared with that from CZA alone producing log10 CFU values of 2.15 and 2.18, respectively. ATM, tigecycline 50 mg, and tigecycline 100 mg demonstrated increases in bacterial growth at 24 h compared with that at 0 h of 2.33, 2.36, and 1.44 log10 CFU, respectively.

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Efficacy (mean change in log10 CFU ± standard deviation) of human simulated CZA at 2.5 g q8h, ATM at 2 g q6h, tigecycline at 50 mg q12h (TGC 50), and tigecycline at 100 mg q12h (TGC 100) alone and in combination against K. pneumoniae 518 (n = 6 for each group).

Despite the in vitro resistance observed for individual compounds, in vitro synergy was demonstrated with CZA and ATM, similar to previous in vitro work, providing us with a “zone of hope” regarding viable therapeutic approaches for this extensively drug resistant (XDR) organism (9, 13). Consistent with high rates of clinical failure reported in cancer patients with pneumonia treated with tigecycline, the K. pneumoniae 518 in vitro susceptibility to tigecycline was not translated to the neutropenic murine lung model at humanized doses reflective of 50 and 100 mg q12h (14). These tigecycline doses were based on a previous murine thigh model regimen that demonstrated in vivo efficacy against extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and K. pneumoniae. Furthermore, tigecycline demonstrated efficacy in a murine pneumonia model against Staphylococcus aureus, thereby eliminating an inadequate pharmacokinetic model or animal model selection as the cause of tigecycline failure (6, 15). The humanized dose of CZA monotherapy resulted in extensive in vivo killing, and as a result, synergy was not observed with combinations. This in vitro/in vivo discordance may be attributed to the broad serine β-lactamase inhibition by CZA and the poor in vivo expression of NDM, as previously described (4). Based on these and previous in vivo observations, additional investigation should be undertaken to determine the clinical utility of CZA as a monotherapy or in combination with other agents in the face of evolving metallo-β-lactamases. Furthermore, the in vivo activity of this in vitro synergistic combination in other sterile body fluids is unknown and should be further investigated.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Jennifer Tabor-Rennie, Sara Robinson, Debora Santini, Elizabeth Cyr, Christina Sutherland, Kimelyn Greenwood, Islam Ghazi, Abrar Thabit, Kamilia Abdelraouf, and Mordechai Grupper from the Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford, CT, for their assistance with conducting this study.

This study was supported in part by funds and facilities provided by the Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Affairs Merit Review Program award no. 1I01BX001974, the Biomedical Laboratory Research & Development Service of the VA Office of Research, and the Development and the Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center VISN 10 to R.A.B. This work was also supported by funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under award no. R01AI063517, R01AI072219, and R01AI100560 to R.A.B.

Funding organizations were not involved in the design and conduct of the study, the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data, or the preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or the Department of Veterans Affairs.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 6 March 2017.
    • Returned for modification 7 April 2017.
    • Accepted 12 April 2017.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 17 April 2017.
  • Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved .

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Queenan AM,
    2. Bush K
    . 2007. Carbapenemases: the versatile beta-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev20:440–448. doi:10.1128/CMR.00001-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Nordmann P,
    2. Naas T,
    3. Poirel L
    . 2011. Global spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Emerg Infect Dis17:1791–1798. doi:10.3201/eid1710.110655.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Lagacé-Wiens PR,
    2. Tailor F,
    3. Simner P,
    4. DeCorby M,
    5. Karlowsky JA,
    6. Walkty A,
    7. Hoban DJ,
    8. Zhanel GG
    . 2011. Activity of NXL104 in combination with beta-lactams against genetically characterized Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates producing class A extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and class C beta-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother55:2434–2437. doi:10.1128/AAC.01722-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. MacVane SH,
    2. Crandon JL,
    3. Nichols WW,
    4. Nicolau DP
    . 2014. Unexpected in vivo activity of ceftazidime alone and in combination with avibactam against New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in a murine thigh infection model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother58:7007–7009. doi:10.1128/AAC.02662-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Livermore D,
    2. Mushtaq S,
    3. Warner M,
    4. Zhang J,
    5. Maharjan S,
    6. Doumith M,
    7. Woodford N
    . 2011. Activities of NXL104 combinations with ceftazidime and aztreonam against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother55:390–394. doi:10.1128/AAC.00756-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Tessier PR,
    2. Nicolau DP
    . 2013. Tigecycline displays in vivo bactericidal activity against extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae after 72-hour exposure period. Antimicrob Agents Chemother57:640–642. doi:10.1128/AAC.01824-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Crandon JL,
    2. Nicolau DP
    . 2013. Human simulated studies of aztreonam and aztreonam-avibactam to evaluate activity against challenging Gram-negative organisms, including metallo-β-lactamase producers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother57:3299–3306. doi:10.1128/AAC.01989-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Crandon JL,
    2. Schuck VJ,
    3. Banevicius MA,
    4. Beaudoin ME,
    5. Nichols WW,
    6. Tanudra MA,
    7. Nicolau DP
    . 2012. Comparative in vitro and in vivo efficacies of human simulated doses of ceftazidime and ceftazidime-avibactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother56:6137–6146. doi:10.1128/AAC.00851-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Rosa R,
    2. Rudin SD,
    3. Rojas LJ,
    4. Perez-Cardona A,
    5. Aragon L,
    6. Nicolau DP,
    7. Perez F,
    8. Bonomo RA,
    9. Martinez O,
    10. Camargo J,
    11. Abbo L
    . 2016. Application of “precision medicine” through the molecular characterization of extensively drug resistant (XDR) Klebsiella pneumoniae in a multivisceral transplant candidate. Open Forum Infect Dis3(Suppl 1):2032. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofw172.1580.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2016. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 25th informational supplement. Document 132 M100-S25. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute,Wayne, PA.
  11. 11.↵
    1. Hall MJ,
    2. Middleton RF,
    3. Westmacott D
    . 1983. The fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index as a measure of synergy. J Antimicrob Chemother11:427–433. doi:10.1093/jac/11.5.427.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Gunderson B,
    2. Ibrahim KH,
    3. Hovde LB,
    4. Fromm TL,
    5. Reed MD,
    6. Rotschafer JC
    . 2003. Synergistic activity of colistin and ceftazidime against multiantibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother47:905–909. doi:10.1128/AAC.47.3.905-909.2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Marshall S,
    2. Hujer AM,
    3. Rojas LJ,
    4. Papp-Wallace KM,
    5. Humphries RM,
    6. Spellberg B,
    7. Hujer KM,
    8. Marshall EK,
    9. Rudin SD,
    10. Perez F,
    11. Wilson BM,
    12. Wasserman RB,
    13. Chikowski L,
    14. Paterson DL,
    15. Vila AJ,
    16. van Duin D,
    17. Kreiswirth BN,
    18. Chambers HF,
    19. Fowler VG Jr,
    20. Jacobs MR,
    21. Pulse ME,
    22. Weiss WJ,
    23. Bonomo RA
    . 2017. Can ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam overcome β-lactam resistance conferred by metallo-β-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae?Antimicrob Agents Chemother61:e02243-16. doi:10.1128/AAC.02243-16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Chemaly RF,
    2. Hanmod SS,
    3. Jiang Y,
    4. Rathod DB,
    5. Mulanovich V,
    6. Adachi JA,
    7. Rolston KV,
    8. Raad II,
    9. Hachem RY
    . 2009. Tigecycline use in cancer patients with serious infections: a report on 110 cases from a single institution. Medicine (Baltimore)88:211–220. doi:10.1097/MD.0b013e3181af01fc.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Koomanachai P,
    2. Crandon JL,
    3. Banevicius MA,
    4. Peng L,
    5. Nicolau DP
    . 2009. Pharmacodynamic profile of tigecycline against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an experimental pneumonia model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother53:5060–5063. doi:10.1128/AAC.00985-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
In Vitro Discordance with In Vivo Activity: Humanized Exposures of Ceftazidime-Avibactam, Aztreonam, and Tigecycline Alone and in Combination against New Delhi Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Murine Lung Infection Model
M. L. Monogue, L. M. Abbo, R. Rosa, J. F. Camargo, O. Martinez, R. A. Bonomo, D. P. Nicolau
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jun 2017, 61 (7) e00486-17; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00486-17

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Vitro Discordance with In Vivo Activity: Humanized Exposures of Ceftazidime-Avibactam, Aztreonam, and Tigecycline Alone and in Combination against New Delhi Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Murine Lung Infection Model
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
In Vitro Discordance with In Vivo Activity: Humanized Exposures of Ceftazidime-Avibactam, Aztreonam, and Tigecycline Alone and in Combination against New Delhi Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Murine Lung Infection Model
M. L. Monogue, L. M. Abbo, R. Rosa, J. F. Camargo, O. Martinez, R. A. Bonomo, D. P. Nicolau
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jun 2017, 61 (7) e00486-17; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00486-17
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • TEXT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Azabicyclo Compounds
aztreonam
ceftazidime
ceftazidime-avibactam
Klebsiella pneumoniae
resistance
New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596