Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mechanisms of Resistance

Resistance to the Cyclotide Cycloviolacin O2 in Salmonella enterica Caused by Different Mutations That Often Confer Cross-Resistance or Collateral Sensitivity to Other Antimicrobial Peptides

Sohaib Z. Malik, Marius Linkevicius, Ulf Göransson, Dan I. Andersson
Sohaib Z. Malik
aDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Biomedical Center, Uppsala, Sweden
bDivision of Pharmacognosy, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, Biomedical Center, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marius Linkevicius
aDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Biomedical Center, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ulf Göransson
bDivision of Pharmacognosy, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, Biomedical Center, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dan I. Andersson
aDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Biomedical Center, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00684-17
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are essential components of innate immunity in all living organisms, and these potent broad-spectrum antimicrobials have inspired several antibacterial development programs in the past 2 decades. In this study, the development of resistance to the Gram-negative bacterium-specific peptide cycloviolacin O2 (cyO2), a member of the cyclotide family of plant miniproteins, was characterized in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2. Mutants isolated from serial passaging experiments in increasing concentrations of cyO2 were characterized by whole-genome sequencing. The identified mutations were genetically reconstituted in a wild-type background. The additive effect of mutations was studied in double mutants. Fitness costs, levels of resistance, and cross-resistance to another cyclotide, other peptide and nonpeptide antibiotics, and AMPs were determined. A variety of resistance mutations were identified. Some of these reduced fitness and others had no effect on fitness in vitro, in the absence of cyO2. In mouse competition experiments, four of the cyO2-resistant mutants showed a significant fitness advantage, whereas the effects of the mutations in the others appeared to be neutral. The level of resistance was increased by combining several individual resistance mutations. Several cases of cross-resistance and collateral sensitivity between cyclotides, other AMPs, and antibiotics were identified. These results show that resistance to cyclotides can evolve via several different types of mutations with only minor fitness costs and that these mutations often affect resistance to other AMPs.

INTRODUCTION

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are highly potent, broad-spectrum, bactericidal compounds with membranes as targets, a feature that has led to a widespread belief that bacteria would have difficulties developing resistance to them (1); however, this belief has been challenged by a number of studies which demonstrate that AMP resistance is relatively easy to acquire (2–6). On the basis of the findings of these studies, it has been suggested that therapeutic exposure of bacteria to AMPs could result in the development of resistance, and as a consequence, we might compromise our innate immunity by equipping bacteria with the means to circumvent the defensive barrier posed by our own AMPs (7).

Cyclotides constitute a family of plant miniproteins (8) with a cyclotide scaffold (Fig. 1), composed of a global structure with an interwoven network of three disulfide bonds (9). The resulting cyclic cystine knot is a very stable structure that can withstand harsh conditions (10). Cyclotides have various biological activities (11–16), but one less explored activity of cyclotides is their antibacterial action. Our previous work showed that the cyclotide cycloviolacin O2 (cyO2) is a potent AMP with activity against Gram-negative bacteria (17). Combined with their high stability and versatile backbone structure, this offered an argument to explore their antimicrobial potential. However, our current understanding of the bacterial mechanisms of resistance toward cyclotides is rudimentary, and any potential future use of these AMPs as drugs would require a better understanding of both mechanisms of action and resistance. Here, bacterial development of resistance to cyO2, isolated from Viola odorata, was studied.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

(Top) Schematic structure of the cyclotide scaffold. The disulfide bonds are shown in yellow (PDB accession number 2KNM ). The α-helix in loop 3 is colored in red and yellow. (Bottom) The primary structures of the two cyclotides cyO2 and cyO3 are given.

RESULTS

Selection, isolation, and characterization of resistant mutants. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (strain DA6192) was serially passaged in increasing concentration of cyO2. At the end of the experiment (100 to 150 passages), the 14 Salmonella lineages grew in the presence of 5 to 19 times the starting concentration of cyO2 (Table 1), indicating substantial increases in resistance. Clones used for further analysis were isolated from these populations by streaking for single colonies on LB agar (LA) plates.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Summary of serial passaging experiment

Resistance in the isolated clones was characterized by time-kill experiments (data not shown) and MIC assays (Table 2). The S. Typhimurium mutants were 3- to 6-fold less susceptible to cyO2 than the wild type, and they suffered a fitness reduction of 19 to 35%, measured as the exponential growth rate in a rich medium and a minimal medium (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Relative fitness (in MHB and M9-G) and MIC of isolated mutants whose genomes were sequenced by whole-genome sequencing

The whole genomes of five independent clones of S. Typhimurium resistant to cyO2 were sequenced and analyzed for sequence changes compared to the sequence of the wild type. All mutants had between 6 and 12 mutations in different genes (see Table SI2 in the supplemental material). Genes that were mutated in more than one mutant are listed in Table SI3.

Reconstituted Salmonella mutants are resistant to cyO2.Each of 10 candidate resistance mutations identified during the whole-genome sequencing were genetically reconstituted in a wild-type S. Typhimurium background by bacteriophage lambda Red recombineering (18). The criterion for the mutations to be selected as candidate mutations was their independent recovery in more than one serially passaged lineage, indicating that they were selected and conferred resistance rather than being randomly appearing mutations (Table SI3). The genes chosen for further study were phoQ and pmrA, which are involved in lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis (19); envZ, which encodes an inner membrane protein involved in regulation of expression of outer membrane proteins and virulence factors (20, 21); ftsW, which encodes a cell division protein and lipid flippase (22, 23); yjeP, which encodes a mechanosensitive ion channel (24); rnc, which encodes RNase III, which processes rRNAs and some mRNAs (25); pnp, which encodes an exoribonuclease which is a member of the mRNA degradosome (26); rpoC, which encodes the B′ subunit of RNA polymerase (27); and plsX, which has a role in phospholipid biosynthesis (28).

Reconstructed strains were tested for resistance to cyO2. Other than the plsX mutant, all reconstituted strains were less susceptible (3- to 5-log reduction in killing) to cyO2 than the congenic wild-type strains (Fig. 2).

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Killing curves of cyO2-resistant reconstituted mutants and their congenic wild-type strains after treatment with 12.5 μM cyO2. Bacteria were subjected to the peptide, and the number of viable cells was measured at 0, 4, and 24 h.

Combinations of resistance mutations confer a higher level of resistance.Nine reconstituted mutants of S. Typhimurium showed reduced susceptibility to cyO2, but the resistance conferred by any single mutation alone could not explain the resistance levels observed in the original isolated mutants. Furthermore, as all cyO2-resistant mutants isolated from the serial passaging experiment contained more than six mutated genes, we combined the different resistance mutations to make double mutants. Since the ftsW mutation was repeatedly recovered in many lineages, all of the other resistance mutations were each combined with this mutation. These mutants were characterized by time-kill experiments and MIC assays to determine resistance levels (Fig. 3 and Table 3). The combination of the ftsW mutation with any other mutation (envZ, phoQ, pmrA, yjeP, rpoC, and pnp) resulted in increased resistance compared to that of the isolate with the single mutations, whereas the combination of ftsW with either rnc or plsX conferred no increased resistance.

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Survival index of the wild type and the cyO2-resistant single and double mutants. Bacteria were treated with 25 μM cyO2, and the number of surviving CFU was counted after 4 h. The number of surviving cells per milliliter was divided by the number of cells at the start of the experiment. The resulting value was expressed as a percentage.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

MIC values of cyO2-resistant double mutants

Fitness of cyO2-resistant mutants in laboratory media.The fitness of the reconstituted cyO2-resistant mutants was measured in rich medium (Mueller-Hinton broth [MHB]) and minimal medium (M9 minimal medium plus 0.2% glucose [M9-G]) (Table 4). These mutants were grouped into three categories on the basis of fitness: (i) the two pmrA mutants and the envZ mutant showed no significant reduction in fitness in either of the two media, (ii) the ftsW mutant had a significant advantage over the wild type in both media, and (iii) the remaining six strains showed a significant fitness cost in both M9-G and MHB.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4

Fitness of reconstituted strains relative to that of congenic wild-type strains

Some cyO2-resistant mutants show a fitness advantage in mice.The fitness of reconstituted cyO2-resistant mutants was measured by a competition experiment in a mouse intraperitoneal infection model. As shown in Fig. 4, no fitness cost was observed for any of the mutants. In contrast, the envZ mutant, the pnp mutant, and two pmrA mutants had a significant fitness advantage over the wild type. In particular, the envZ mutant possessed an exceptionally high advantage over its congenic wild-type strain, where the ratio of mutant/wild type changed from 1:1 to from 100:1 to 200:1 in spleen and liver over only 2 days of growth in mice.

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

In vivo fitness of cyO2-resistant strains. cyO2-resistant strains were competed with their respective wild-type strains in a mouse infection model. The horizontal line for each time point represents the median value. Error bars indicate the range of data points. The relative competitive index values were normalized for the effect of ChlR and KanR genetic markers.

Cross-resistance of cyO2-resistant mutants to cyclotides, AMPs, and antibiotics.Cross-resistance to cyO3 was determined by time-kill experiments using the cyO2-resistant single mutants. Apart from one of the pmrA mutants, cyO2-resistant mutants were less susceptible to cyO3 than the wild type (Fig. SI1). However, the degree of reduced susceptibility at the tested concentration (12.5 μM) varied among the different mutants, and the most pronounced cross-resistance was seen in the ftsW, phoQ, and rnc mutants.

The cross-resistance of cyO2-resistant mutants toward other classes of AMPs was determined by MIC assays in microtiter plates, using three peptides: LL-37, which is a human cathelicidin; CNY100HL (CNY), which is a derivative of the C3a component of the human complement system; and wheat germ histones (WGH) (Table SI4). No significant increase in the MIC was observed for LL-37. Only the pnp mutant was less susceptible to CNY than the wild type, and a 2-fold increase in MIC values was seen for WGH in all mutants.

Cross-resistance to a set of antibiotics was determined using Etests. The envZ mutant was less susceptible to several antibiotics (Table SI5). In contrast, the ftsW mutant was slightly more susceptible to penicillin G and ampicillin than the wild type. Other small differences (up to 2-fold) in antibiotic susceptibility were observed for several different mutants (Table SI5).

Cross-resistance of AMP-resistant mutants to cyO2.A set of S. Typhimurium mutants isolated from different serial passaging experiments previously performed in the Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology and with altered cell membrane characteristics were tested for cross-resistance to cyO2. As shown in Fig. 5, an LL-37-resistant mutant was cross-resistant to cyO2 (3 logs less killing than that of the wild type after 24 h). As these mutations were not in identical genetic backgrounds, these effects were explored further using a set of defined AMP-resistant strains constructed in other studies (9, 29–31). As can be seen in Fig. 6, an sbmA deletion mutant resistant to PR-39 and a phoP mutant resistant to LL-37, CNY, and WHG were cross-resistant to cyO2 (3 to 4 logs less killing after 24 h).

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Susceptibility of S. Typhimurium mutants serially passaged with the AMPs or antibiotics indicated in the key to cyO2 at 12.5 μM.

FIG 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 6

Cross-resistance profile of cyO2. In the title to each panel, the genotype and the peptide to which the tested strain is resistant are indicated. Samples were withdrawn at 0, 4, and 24 h. *, triple mutant (the triple mutant had resistance characteristics similar to those of the single mutants; **, very-low-level resistance.

AMP-resistant mutants that show collateral sensitivity to cyO2.As shown in Fig. 7, two cases of collateral sensitivity to cyO2 were identified. First, certain mutations in the pmrAB system conferring resistance to colistin rendered these mutants collaterally sensitive to cyO2. For example, one colistin-resistant pmrA mutant (R81C mutation, strain DA10857) was particularly susceptible to cyO2, showing 3 logs of killing after 4 h and complete killing after 24 h, whereas there was no killing for the wild type. However, it is notable that certain pmrA mutations did in fact confer resistance to cyO2 (Fig. 2), indicating that the pmrA mutations have allele-specific effects. Second, a protamine-resistant hemL mutant (W59R, DA11799) was collaterally more sensitive to cyO2 (3 logs more killing after 24 h).

FIG 7
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 7

Collateral sensitivity to cyO2. Mutant strains resistant to other AMPs or antibiotics were treated with cyO2 at 6.25 μM. Samples were withdrawn at 0, 4, and 24 h.

DISCUSSION

The mutational pathways conferring resistance to cyO2 could be broadly divided into those regulated by (i) genes (pmrA, phoPQ, envZ, rnc, and pnp) that have previously been associated with the development of resistance to several AMPs, (ii) genes (rpoC and sbmA) that are involved in conferring resistance to AMPs that are internalized into the cytoplasm, and (iii) genes that have not been previously linked with the development of resistance to AMPs (ftsW and yjeP). The mutations that confer resistance to cyO2 are expected to change bacterial physiology in different ways (Fig. 8). It is notable that a number of the identified resistance mutations are in genes whose products regulate the expression of several other genes that not only are involved in antimicrobial peptide resistance but also confer protection against the innate host defense at large. Thus, these mutations could have broad effects and result in modification of lipopolysaccharide, secretion systems, biofilm formation, and the outer membrane protein profile. Such regulatory genes conferring resistance to cyO2 include (i) the transcriptional regulators envZ, phoPQ, and pmrA, which act either directly or through downstream response regulators (19, 21, 32), and (ii) the posttranscriptional regulators ribonucleases rnc and pnp, which control RNA turnover and the maturation of different virulence factors (Fig. 8) (33–35). Resistance mutations other than mutations in genes controlling these broad regulatory mechanisms are discussed below.

FIG 8
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 8

Potential pathways of resistance to cyO2. OMPs, outer membrane proteins; OM, outer membrane; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; PG, peptidoglycan; PM, plasma membrane.

The mutation T248N in the essential cell division protein FtsW confers resistance to cyO2. It was present in four out of the five cyO2-resistant strains isolated. FtsW is proposed to be a lipid II flippase in Escherichia coli (23), and as a late recruit to the divisome, it has an important role in septum formation (36). This mutation might be involved in blocking the access of cyclotides to the phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) phospholipids, which are preferentially targeted by cyclotides (37, 38). Interestingly, the segment from E240 to A249 of the FtsW protein, which contains the cyO2 resistance mutation, is a key element in the functioning of FtsW in the septal peptidoglycan assembly machinery (39), which is assembled at about the time when PE phospholipids concentrate at the septum and required for constriction of the ftsZ ring (40).

Resistance to AMPs conferred by mutations in the putative membrane transporter of peptides SbmA (41) has been previously seen for AMPs that are internalized into the bacterial cytoplasm. This includes the proline-rich peptides, e.g., PR-39; the glycopeptide bleomycin; and the lassopeptides microcins J25 and B17 (29, 42, 43). This is in line with a previous observation that cyclotides are taken up into human lymphoma cells (44), implying that cyclotides have modes of action other than membrane damage.

A substitution mutation in rpoC (W1020R), which encodes the RNA polymerase B′ subunit, confers resistance to cyO2. Three of the five isolated S. Typhimurium mutants contained a mutation in rpoC, and two of these had the above-mentioned mutation (the other mutation was F1165S). Similar mutations in the central channel of RNA polymerase have been demonstrated to confer resistance to microcin J25 (45, 46).

Finally, a single nucleotide variation in the mechanosensitive ion channel yjeP, whose activity has been characterized in E. coli (24), conferred resistance to cyO2. This nonspecific ion channel responds to hypo-osmotic shock by releasing osmotically active ions and solutes, which might be a mechanism for compensation for the osmotic stress induced by cyO2.

Four of the nine reconstituted mutants carried a significant fitness advantage over their congenic wild-type strains in a mouse infection model, while the other five mutants were as fit as the wild type (Fig. 4). Generally, it is believed that AMP resistance is accompanied by an associated fitness cost. The significant fitness advantage acquired by almost half of the cyO2-resistant mutants in mice challenges this notion and suggests that AMP resistance might be associated with higher virulence in a host, a potential concern that has been pointed out previously (47).

In the double mutants, where one of the other resistance mutations was combined with the ftsW mutation, the general trend was that two mutations increased the level of resistance. One double mutant (the ftsW rpoC mutant) had a 4-fold increase in MIC compared to the wild type (Table 3). As demonstrated by the high number of different mutations that could be added to the ftsW mutation to increase the level of resistance, the potential mutational target for cyO2 resistance is large.

As summarized in Fig. 9, collateral sensitivity and cross-resistance were common among the tested mutants. Thus, two cases of collateral sensitivity to cyO2 were observed: pmrA mutations selected for colistin resistance (30), and a hemL mutation selected for resistance to protamine (31). Conversely, several cases of cross-resistance were seen, where mutations in sbmA, phoP, hemL, and pmrA conferred resistance to AMPs and/or antibiotics other than those they were selected on.

FIG 9
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 9

Resistance relationships between peptide antimicrobial agents.

In conclusion, the presented data demonstrate that several different types of mutations can generate resistance to cyclotides. These mutations are either neutral or confer a fitness advantage in a mouse infection model and often affect resistance to other AMPs by conferring either cross-resistance or collateral sensitivity. The finding of enhanced fitness in mice and cross-resistance suggests that the future therapeutic use of AMPs needs to be carefully monitored and evaluated to avoid the risk of selection of mutants with potential cross-resistance to human AMPs and/or antibiotics. However, the occurrence of collateral sensitivity is promising, since it suggests that an alternating drug-cycling protocol may slow the rate of development of resistance to AMPs, as has been observed for antibiotics (48, 49).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant material.Dried aerial parts of Viola odorata L. (Violaceae) were obtained from Alfred Galke (Gittelde, Germany; lot 17057).

Extraction of cyclotides.cyO2 and cyO3 (Fig. 1) were isolated as previously described (50).

HPLC.For fractionation of plant extracts, a Waters 600 controller high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system was used (Waters Corporation, MA, USA). A Phenomenex C18 column (250 by 21.20 mm [inside diameter {i.d.}]; particle size, 10 μm; 300 Å) was used. A linear gradient from 10% acetonitrile (ACN), 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (buffer A) to 60% ACN, 0.05% TFA (buffer B) was run over 45 min. Fractions were analyzed by electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) in the positive-ion mode; the capillary temperature was set at 220°C, and the spray voltage was set at 4 kV. Purification of fractions was done by using an Äkta basic HPLC system (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden). A Phenomenex C18 column (250 by 10 mm [i.d.]; particle size, 5 μm; 300 Å) was used for purification. For purification of cyO2, reverse-phase HPLC was done by running a linear gradient from 40 to 70% buffer B in buffer A. Fractions were analyzed by ESI-MS, and the pure fractions were freeze-dried. Analytical reverse phase C-18-HPLC experiments were performed using a Vydac C18 column (250 by 4.6 mm [i.d.]; particle size, 5 μm; 300 Å) and a linear gradient from buffer A to buffer B over 30 min at a flow rate of 1 ml/min.

Quantification.The dried powder was dissolved, and the weight was calculated by measuring the UV absorbance using a NanoDrop UV spectrophotometer (extinction coefficient of cyO2, 7,420/M/cm). The purity of cyO2 was more than 95%, as determined by analytical HPLC.

Antimicrobial peptides.A mixture of wheat germ histones (WGH) in 0.1% acetic acid was kindly supplied by Lars-Olof Hedén at Lund University, Lund, Sweden (isolated as described previously [51]). CNY100HL (CKYILLLRRQLARAWRRGLR) (52) and LL-37 (LLGDFFRKSKEKIGKEFKRIVQRIKDFLRNLVPRTES) (53) were obtained from Innovagen AB (Lund, Sweden).

Bacterial strains.For the serial passage experiment, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2 DA6192 was used. The other strains used are listed in Table SI1 in the supplemental material).

Serial passaging.Six independent cultures of S. Typhimurium were started in 200 μl of 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (SPB) with 0.1% Trypticase soy broth (TSB) by adding 105 bacteria to each culture. Four out of the six cultures were treated with cyO2, and the remaining two lineages were untreated controls. For every cycle, 2 μl of an overnight culture was added to a final volume of 200 μl of fresh culture. Every day, samples (60 μl) from each culture were added to a 96-well plate, and the values of the optical density at 620 nm were determined in a plate reader (Multiskan FC; Thermo Scientific). Every 5th day, 120 μl from an overnight culture in 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was frozen at −80°C. CyO2 was added just before addition of bacteria. The starting concentration of cyO2 for the cycling experiment was 6 μM. The concentration of cyO2 was raised by a factor of 1.5 after every 10 cycles. In case the bacteria could not survive in the presence of the higher concentration, cycling from the frozen culture was resumed at a lower concentration for a few more cycles. Cycling was stopped after 150 cycles (900 to 1,050 generations). Ten additional lineages of Salmonella were cycled for 100 cycles.

Isolation of mutants.By streaking for single cells, mutant clones were isolated on LA plates. Cultures from these clones were saved in 10% DMSO frozen at −80°C.

Whole-genome sequencing.Genomic DNA was isolated using a Genomic Tip 100G DNA kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Five resistant clones from the cycling experiment were sent to the Beijing Genome Institute (BGI; China) for whole-genome sequencing using the Illumina sequencing technology. CLC Genomics Workbench software (version 5.5.1; CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark) was used to assemble the sequencing reads and detect regions with sequence variations (quality-based variant detection) and regions with no coverage compared to the sequence of the S. Typhimurium LT2 wild-type strain. The cutoff frequency was set to 75%.

Time-kill experiments.Overnight cultures of bacteria in SPB (20 mM) supplemented with 0.1% TSB (Becton, Dickinson and Company, USA) were diluted to 2.5 × 106 to 3.5 × 106 CFU/ml in fresh medium. Ninety microliters of this suspension was transferred into microcentrifuge tubes containing 10 μl of cyO2 solution. The tubes were incubated with shaking at 37°C. Samples (10 μl) were taken from each tube and spread on LA plates at 0, 4 and 24 h at suitable dilutions.

Determination of antimicrobial peptide MICs.Overnight cultures of bacteria in SPB (20 mM) supplemented with 0.1% TSB were diluted to 5 × 105 CFU/ml in the same medium. Ninety microliters was transferred into 96-well microtiter plates containing 10 μl of serially diluted cyO2 solution. The plates were incubated in a shaking incubator at 37°C for 16 to 20 h. The tested concentration of cyO2 was 50 μM to 0.39 μM, and 1.5-fold dilution steps were used. At least two independent experiments, each with two technical replicates, were performed.

Determination of antibiotic MICs.MIC values for antibiotics were determined using Etests, as described by the manufacturer (AB Biodisk).

Genetic reconstitution of mutations.Mutations that appeared in more than one resistant isolate were reconstituted in a wild-type genetic background by standard genetic techniques. In brief, a kanamycin (KanR) or chloramphenicol (ChlR) resistance marker was introduced 3 to 10 kb away from the mutation of interest either by use of a temperature-controlled linear transformation system or by P22 transduction of relevant KanR or ChlR markers from our strain collection. P22 lysates were then prepared with the constructed strains and used to infect the wild-type strain. From each transduction, a congenic strain pair in which one strain carried the mutation and the resistance marker and the other strain carried only the resistance marker was saved. Subsequently, the KanR-ChlR cassette was removed by expression of Flp recombinase, leaving an 85-nucleotide scar. Reconstituted strains were confirmed by PCR and DNA sequencing.

Fitness measurements in laboratory media.Fitness measurements were carried out in Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB) and M9 minimal medium plus 0.2% glucose (M9-G). Four independent overnight cultures of bacteria were diluted 1,000-fold in the same media, and 300 μl from this dilution was transferred to 96-well Bioscreen plates (in duplicate). Bacterial exponential growth was measured in a Bioscreen C analyzer (Oy Growth Curves Ab Ltd.) every 4 min for 16 h at 37°C in continuous shaking mode. Relative fitness was determined by dividing the growth rate of mutant strain by that of the congenic wild-type strain.

Fitness measurements in mice.Fresh overnight cultures of an S. Typhimurium mutant (tagged with the ChlR) and the isogenic wild-type strain (tagged with the KanR) were grown in LB at 37°C and 190 rpm until saturation. The cells were washed 3 times in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and the competitors were mixed in a 1:1 ratio. For each competition, four 7-week-old female BALB/c mice were injected intraperitoneally with 100 μl of approximately 2 × 106 to 4 × 106 CFU/ml of bacteria. The number of bacteria in the inoculum was quantified by plating appropriate dilutions on LB agar plates supplemented with chloramphenicol (25 mg/liter) or kanamycin (50 mg/liter). At 2 days postinfection, the mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Spleens and livers were harvested, and homogenized cell suspensions were prepared in PBS. Dilutions were spread on LB plates supplemented with chloramphenicol or kanamycin to determine the ratio of the mutant to the wild type. The competitive index was calculated as the ratio of the mutant to the wild type after competition divided by the ratio of the mutant to the wild type in the initial inoculum. All values were normalized to those of the competition experiment with Salmonella strains tagged with only the ChlR and KanR. The Uppsala Animal Ethics Committee (permit no. C154/14) approved all animal experiments.

Statistical analysis.The statistical significance of the fitness measurements in laboratory growth medium was determined by Student's t test, with the significance level being set to 95% (P < 0.05). In the in vivo fitness assay, the median values were used, while the data for all the replicates are shown. Data for time-kill assays and MIC assays represent the average values from at least two independent experiments.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by Swedish Research Council grants to D.I.A. and U.G.

We thank Maria Pränting for useful discussions and comments.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 1 April 2017.
    • Returned for modification 23 April 2017.
    • Accepted 29 May 2017.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 12 June 2017.
  • Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00684-17 .

  • Copyright © 2017 Malik et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Zasloff M
    . 2002. Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature415:389–395. doi:10.1038/415389a.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Perron GG,
    2. Zasloff M,
    3. Bell G
    . 2006. Experimental evolution of resistance to an antimicrobial peptide. Proc Biol Sci273:251–256. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3301.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Habets MG,
    2. Brockhurst MA
    . 2012. Therapeutic antimicrobial peptides may compromise natural immunity. Biol Lett8:416–418. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2011.1203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Mishra NN,
    2. McKinnell J,
    3. Yeaman MR,
    4. Rubio A,
    5. Nast CC,
    6. Chen L,
    7. Kreiswirth BN,
    8. Bayer AS
    . 2011. In vitro cross-resistance to daptomycin and host defense cationic antimicrobial peptides in clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother55:4012–4018. doi:10.1128/AAC.00223-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Lofton H,
    2. Pranting M,
    3. Thulin E,
    4. Andersson DI
    . 2013. Mechanisms and fitness costs of resistance to antimicrobial peptides LL-37, CNY100HL and wheat germ histones. PLoS One8:e68875. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068875.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Lofton H,
    2. Anwar N,
    3. Rhen M,
    4. Andersson DI
    . 2015. Fitness of Salmonella mutants resistant to antimicrobial peptides. J Antimicrob Chemother70:432–440. doi:10.1093/jac/dku423.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Bell G,
    2. Gouyon PH
    . 2003. Arming the enemy: the evolution of resistance to self-proteins. Microbiology149:1367–1375. doi:10.1099/mic.0.26265-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Burman R,
    2. Gunasekera S,
    3. Stromstedt AA,
    4. Goransson U
    . 2014. Chemistry and biology of cyclotides: circular plant peptides outside the box. J Nat Prod77:724–736. doi:10.1021/np401055j.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Rosengren KJ,
    2. Daly NL,
    3. Plan MR,
    4. Waine C,
    5. Craik DJ
    . 2003. Twists, knots, and rings in proteins. Structural definition of the cyclotide framework. J Biol Chem278:8606–8616.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Colgrave ML,
    2. Craik DJ
    . 2004. Thermal, chemical, and enzymatic stability of the cyclotide kalata B1: the importance of the cyclic cystine knot. Biochemistry43:5965–5975. doi:10.1021/bi049711q.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Lindholm P,
    2. Goransson U,
    3. Johansson S,
    4. Claeson P,
    5. Gullbo J,
    6. Larsson R,
    7. Bohlin L,
    8. Backlund A
    . 2002. Cyclotides: a novel type of cytotoxic agents. Mol Cancer Ther1:365–369.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Daly NL,
    2. Craik DJ
    . 2000. Acyclic permutants of naturally occurring cyclic proteins. Characterization of cystine knot and beta-sheet formation in the macrocyclic polypeptide kalata B1. J Biol Chem275:19068–19075.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Gustafson KR,
    2. McKee TC,
    3. Bokesch HR
    . 2004. Anti-HIV cyclotides. Curr Protein Pept Sci5:331–340. doi:10.2174/1389203043379468.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Goransson U,
    2. Sjogren M,
    3. Svangard E,
    4. Claeson P,
    5. Bohlin L
    . 2004. Reversible antifouling effect of the cyclotide cycloviolacin O2 against barnacles. J Nat Prod67:1287–1290. doi:10.1021/np0499719.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Colgrave ML,
    2. Kotze AC,
    3. Ireland DC,
    4. Wang CK,
    5. Craik DJ
    . 2008. The anthelmintic activity of the cyclotides: natural variants with enhanced activity. Chembiochem9:1939–1945. doi:10.1002/cbic.200800174.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Jennings C,
    2. West J,
    3. Waine C,
    4. Craik D,
    5. Anderson M
    . 2001. Biosynthesis and insecticidal properties of plant cyclotides: the cyclic knotted proteins from Oldenlandia affinis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A98:10614–10619. doi:10.1073/pnas.191366898.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Pranting M,
    2. Loov C,
    3. Burman R,
    4. Goransson U,
    5. Andersson DI
    . 2010. The cyclotide cycloviolacin O2 from Viola odorata has potent bactericidal activity against Gram-negative bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother65:1964–1971. doi:10.1093/jac/dkq220.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Datsenko KA,
    2. Wanner BL
    . 2000. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A97:6640–6645. doi:10.1073/pnas.120163297.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Dalebroux ZD,
    2. Miller SI
    . 2014. Salmonellae PhoPQ regulation of the outer membrane to resist innate immunity. Curr Opin Microbiol17:106–113. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2013.12.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Nikaido H
    . 2003. Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability revisited. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev67:593–656. doi:10.1128/MMBR.67.4.593-656.2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Cameron AD,
    2. Dorman CJ
    . 2012. A fundamental regulatory mechanism operating through OmpR and DNA topology controls expression of Salmonella pathogenicity islands SPI-1 and SPI-2. PLoS Genet8:e1002615. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002615.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Mercer KL,
    2. Weiss DS
    . 2002. The Escherichia coli cell division protein FtsW is required to recruit its cognate transpeptidase, FtsI (PBP3), to the division site. J Bacteriol184:904–912. doi:10.1128/jb.184.4.904-912.2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Mohammadi T,
    2. van Dam V,
    3. Sijbrandi R,
    4. Vernet T,
    5. Zapun A,
    6. Bouhss A,
    7. Diepeveen-de Bruin M,
    8. Nguyen-Disteche M,
    9. de Kruijff B,
    10. Breukink E
    . 2011. Identification of FtsW as a transporter of lipid-linked cell wall precursors across the membrane. EMBO J30:1425–1432. doi:10.1038/emboj.2011.61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Edwards MD,
    2. Black S,
    3. Rasmussen T,
    4. Rasmussen A,
    5. Stokes NR,
    6. Stephen TL,
    7. Miller S,
    8. Booth IR
    . 2012. Characterization of three novel mechanosensitive channel activities in Escherichia coli. Channels (Austin)6:272–281. doi:10.4161/chan.20998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Arraiano CM,
    2. Mauxion F,
    3. Viegas SC,
    4. Matos RG,
    5. Seraphin B
    . 2013. Intracellular ribonucleases involved in transcript processing and decay: precision tools for RNA. Biochim Biophys Acta1829:491–513. doi:10.1016/j.bbagrm.2013.03.009.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    1. Carpousis AJ,
    2. Vanzo NF,
    3. Raynal LC
    . 1999. mRNA degradation. A tale of poly(A) and multiprotein machines. Trends Genet15:24–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Ovchinnikov YuA,
    2. Monastyrskaya GS,
    3. Gubanov VV,
    4. Guryev SO,
    5. Salomatina IS,
    6. Shuvaeva TM,
    7. Lipkin VM,
    8. Sverdlov ED
    . 1982. The primary structure of E. coli RNA polymerase, nucleotide sequence of the rpoC gene and amino acid sequence of the beta′-subunit. Nucleic Acids Res10:4035–4044. doi:10.1093/nar/10.13.4035.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Yoshimura M,
    2. Oshima T,
    3. Ogasawara N
    . 2007. Involvement of the YneS/YgiH and PlsX proteins in phospholipid biosynthesis in both Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli. BMC Microbiol7:69. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-7-69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Pranting M,
    2. Negrea A,
    3. Rhen M,
    4. Andersson DI
    . 2008. Mechanism and fitness costs of PR-39 resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2. Antimicrob Agents Chemother52:2734–2741. doi:10.1128/AAC.00205-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Sun S,
    2. Negrea A,
    3. Rhen M,
    4. Andersson DI
    . 2009. Genetic analysis of colistin resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother53:2298–2305. doi:10.1128/AAC.01016-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Pranting M,
    2. Andersson DI
    . 2010. Mechanisms and physiological effects of protamine resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2. J Antimicrob Chemother65:876–887. doi:10.1093/jac/dkq059.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Detweiler CS,
    2. Monack DM,
    3. Brodsky IE,
    4. Mathew H,
    5. Falkow S
    . 2003. virK, somA and rcsC are important for systemic Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection and cationic peptide resistance. Mol Microbiol48:385–400. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03455.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Viegas SC,
    2. Pfeiffer V,
    3. Sittka A,
    4. Silva IJ,
    5. Vogel J,
    6. Arraiano CM
    . 2007. Characterization of the role of ribonucleases in Salmonella small RNA decay. Nucleic Acids Res35:7651–7664. doi:10.1093/nar/gkm916.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. Andrade JM,
    2. Arraiano CM
    . 2008. PNPase is a key player in the regulation of small RNAs that control the expression of outer membrane proteins. RNA14:543–551. doi:10.1261/rna.683308.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Viegas SC,
    2. Mil-Homens D,
    3. Fialho AM,
    4. Arraiano CM
    . 2013. The virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in the insect model Galleria mellonella is impaired by mutations in RNase E and RNase III. Appl Environ Microbiol79:6124–6133. doi:10.1128/AEM.02044-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Fraipont C,
    2. Alexeeva S,
    3. Wolf B,
    4. van der Ploeg R,
    5. Schloesser M,
    6. den Blaauwen T,
    7. Nguyen-Disteche M
    . 2011. The integral membrane FtsW protein and peptidoglycan synthase PBP3 form a subcomplex in Escherichia coli. Microbiology157:251–259. doi:10.1099/mic.0.040071-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Burman R,
    2. Stromstedt AA,
    3. Malmsten M,
    4. Goransson U
    . 2011. Cyclotide-membrane interactions: defining factors of membrane binding, depletion and disruption. Biochim Biophys Acta1808:2665–2673. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.07.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Henriques ST,
    2. Huang YH,
    3. Castanho MA,
    4. Bagatolli LA,
    5. Sonza S,
    6. Tachedjian G,
    7. Daly NL,
    8. Craik DJ
    . 2012. Phosphatidylethanolamine binding is a conserved feature of cyclotide-membrane interactions. J Biol Chem287:33629–33643. doi:10.1074/jbc.M112.372011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Pastoret S,
    2. Fraipont C,
    3. den Blaauwen T,
    4. Wolf B,
    5. Aarsman ME,
    6. Piette A,
    7. Thomas A,
    8. Brasseur R,
    9. Nguyen-Disteche M
    . 2004. Functional analysis of the cell division protein FtsW of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol186:8370–8379. doi:10.1128/JB.186.24.8370-8379.2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Mileykovskaya E,
    2. Sun Q,
    3. Margolin W,
    4. Dowhan W
    . 1998. Localization and function of early cell division proteins in filamentous Escherichia coli cells lacking phosphatidylethanolamine. J Bacteriol180:4252–4257.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Ichige A,
    2. Walker GC
    . 1997. Genetic analysis of the Rhizobium meliloti bacA gene: functional interchangeability with the Escherichia coli sbmA gene and phenotypes of mutants. J Bacteriol179:209–216. doi:10.1128/jb.179.1.209-216.1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Salomon RA,
    2. Farias RN
    . 1995. The peptide antibiotic microcin 25 is imported through the TonB pathway and the SbmA protein. J Bacteriol177:3323–3325. doi:10.1128/jb.177.11.3323-3325.1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    1. Mattiuzzo M,
    2. Bandiera A,
    3. Gennaro R,
    4. Benincasa M,
    5. Pacor S,
    6. Antcheva N,
    7. Scocchi M
    . 2007. Role of the Escherichia coli SbmA in the antimicrobial activity of proline-rich peptides. Mol Microbiol66:151–163. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05903.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Yeshak MY,
    2. Goransson U,
    3. Burman R,
    4. Hellman B
    . 2012. Genotoxicity and cellular uptake of cyclotides: evidence for multiple modes of action. Mutat Res747:176–181. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2012.05.006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Delgado MA,
    2. Rintoul MR,
    3. Farias RN,
    4. Salomon RA
    . 2001. Escherichia coli RNA polymerase is the target of the cyclopeptide antibiotic microcin J25. J Bacteriol183:4543–4550. doi:10.1128/JB.183.15.4543-4550.2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Yuzenkova J,
    2. Delgado M,
    3. Nechaev S,
    4. Savalia D,
    5. Epshtein V,
    6. Artsimovitch I,
    7. Mooney RA,
    8. Landick R,
    9. Farias RN,
    10. Salomon R,
    11. Severinov K
    . 2002. Mutations of bacterial RNA polymerase leading to resistance to microcin J25. J Biol Chem277:50867–50875. doi:10.1074/jbc.M209425200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Andersson DI,
    2. Hughes D,
    3. Kubicek-Sutherland JZ
    . 2016. Mechanisms and consequences of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial peptides. Drug Resist Updat26:43–57. doi:10.1016/j.drup.2016.04.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Imamovic L,
    2. Sommer MO
    . 2013. Use of collateral sensitivity networks to design drug cycling protocols that avoid resistance development. Sci Transl Med5:204ra132. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3006609.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    1. Kim S,
    2. Lieberman TD,
    3. Kishony R
    . 2014. Alternating antibiotic treatments constrain evolutionary paths to multidrug resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A111:14494–14499. doi:10.1073/pnas.1409800111.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    1. Herrmann A,
    2. Svangard E,
    3. Claeson P,
    4. Gullbo J,
    5. Bohlin L,
    6. Goransson U
    . 2006. Key role of glutamic acid for the cytotoxic activity of the cyclotide cycloviolacin O2. Cell Mol Life Sci63:235–245. doi:10.1007/s00018-005-5486-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    1. Simon JH,
    2. Becker WM
    . 1976. A polyethylene glycol/dextran procedure for the isolation of chromatin proteins (histones and nonhistones) from wheat germ. Biochim Biophys Acta454:154–171. doi:10.1016/0005-2787(76)90362-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    1. Pasupuleti M,
    2. Walse B,
    3. Svensson B,
    4. Malmsten M,
    5. Schmidtchen A
    . 2008. Rational design of antimicrobial C3a analogues with enhanced effects against staphylococci using an integrated structure and function-based approach. Biochemistry47:9057–9070. doi:10.1021/bi800991e.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.↵
    1. Gudmundsson GH,
    2. Agerberth B,
    3. Odeberg J,
    4. Bergman T,
    5. Olsson B,
    6. Salcedo R
    . 1996. The human gene FALL39 and processing of the cathelin precursor to the antibacterial peptide LL-37 in granulocytes. Eur J Biochem238:325–332. doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0325z.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Resistance to the Cyclotide Cycloviolacin O2 in Salmonella enterica Caused by Different Mutations That Often Confer Cross-Resistance or Collateral Sensitivity to Other Antimicrobial Peptides
Sohaib Z. Malik, Marius Linkevicius, Ulf Göransson, Dan I. Andersson
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jul 2017, 61 (8) e00684-17; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00684-17

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Resistance to the Cyclotide Cycloviolacin O2 in Salmonella enterica Caused by Different Mutations That Often Confer Cross-Resistance or Collateral Sensitivity to Other Antimicrobial Peptides
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Resistance to the Cyclotide Cycloviolacin O2 in Salmonella enterica Caused by Different Mutations That Often Confer Cross-Resistance or Collateral Sensitivity to Other Antimicrobial Peptides
Sohaib Z. Malik, Marius Linkevicius, Ulf Göransson, Dan I. Andersson
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jul 2017, 61 (8) e00684-17; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00684-17
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides
Cyclotides
Drug Resistance, Bacterial
Salmonella Typhimurium
antimicrobial peptide resistance
cyclotide
cycloviolacin O2
cross-resistance
collateral sensitivity
Salmonella enterica
antimicrobial peptides
fitness
mechanisms of resistance
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596