Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Clinical Therapeutics

Efficacy of a Binuclear Cyclopalladated Compound Therapy for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in the Murine Model of Infection with Leishmania amazonensis and Its Inhibitory Effect on Topoisomerase 1B

Angela Maria Arenas Velásquez, Willian Campos Ribeiro, Vutey Venn, Silvia Castelli, Mariana Santoro de Camargo, Renata Pires de Assis, Rodrigo Alves de Souza, Aline Rimoldi Ribeiro, Thaís Gaban Passalacqua, João Aristeu da Rosa, Amanda Martins Baviera, Antonio Eduardo Mauro, Alessandro Desideri, Elmo Eduardo Almeida-Amaral, Marcia A. S. Graminha
Angela Maria Arenas Velásquez
aSão Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Araraquara, Brazil
bSão Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Chemistry, Araraquara, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Willian Campos Ribeiro
aSão Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Araraquara, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vutey Venn
cUniversity of Rome, Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Silvia Castelli
cUniversity of Rome, Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mariana Santoro de Camargo
cUniversity of Rome, Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Renata Pires de Assis
aSão Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Araraquara, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rodrigo Alves de Souza
bSão Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Chemistry, Araraquara, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aline Rimoldi Ribeiro
dCampinas State University (UNICAMP), Biology Institute, Campinas, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thaís Gaban Passalacqua
aSão Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Araraquara, Brazil
bSão Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Chemistry, Araraquara, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
João Aristeu da Rosa
aSão Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Araraquara, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanda Martins Baviera
aSão Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Araraquara, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antonio Eduardo Mauro
bSão Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Chemistry, Araraquara, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alessandro Desideri
cUniversity of Rome, Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elmo Eduardo Almeida-Amaral
eInstituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcia A. S. Graminha
aSão Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Araraquara, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00688-17
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Leishmaniasis is a disease found throughout the (sub)tropical parts of the world caused by protozoan parasites of the Leishmania genus. Despite the numerous problems associated with existing treatments, pharmaceutical companies continue to neglect the development of better ones. The high toxicity of current drugs combined with emerging resistance makes the discovery of new therapeutic alternatives urgent. We report here the evaluation of a binuclear cyclopalladated complex containing Pd(II) and N,N′-dimethylbenzylamine (Hdmba) against Leishmania amazonensis. The compound [Pd(dmba)(μ-N3)]2 (CP2) inhibits promastigote growth (50% inhibitory concentration [IC50] = 13.2 ± 0.7 μM) and decreases the proliferation of intracellular amastigotes in in vitro incubated macrophages (IC50 = 10.2 ± 2.2 μM) without a cytotoxic effect when tested against peritoneal macrophages (50% cytotoxic concentration = 506.0 ± 10.7 μM). In addition, CP2 was also active against T. cruzi intracellular amastigotes (IC50 = 2.3 ± 0.5 μM, selective index = 225), an indication of its potential for use in Chagas disease therapy. In vivo assays using L. amazonensis-infected BALB/c showed an 80% reduction in parasite load compared to infected and nontreated animals. Also, compared to amphotericin B treatment, CP2 did not show any side effects, which was corroborated by the analysis of plasma levels of different hepatic and renal biomarkers. Furthermore, CP2 was able to inhibit Leishmania donovani topoisomerase 1B (Ldtopo1B), a potentially important target in this parasite. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02169141.)

INTRODUCTION

Neglected tropical diseases affect more than one billion people worldwide (http://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/diseases/en/ ). According to the World Health Organization, the disorders caused by parasites of Leishmania spp. and T. cruzi (family Trypanosomatidae, order Kinetoplastida) that cause leishmaniasis and Chagas disease, respectively, are both considered neglected diseases since they are more prevalent among impoverished areas and are often overlooked by drug developers and other important players involved in drug access, such as officials in governments and public health programs.

Leishmaniasis is an insect-borne disease caused by more than 20 species of Leishmania and can be manifested as cutaneous, mucocutaneous, or visceral forms. These parasitic diseases affect about 12 million people and endanger another 350 million (1). The cutaneous form is the most common manifestation of the disease with 0.7 to 1.3 million new cases annually, 95% of which occur in the Americas. The current treatment for leishmaniasis poses limitations such as toxicity, a difficult route of administration, and a lack of efficacy in areas where leishmaniasis is endemic due to the emergence of drug resistance and ineffective parasite and vector control (2). All currently available drugs against Leishmania were initially developed for other diseases and have limitations when used to treat leishmaniasis. Despite efforts to discover new drugs against Leishmania spp., either through synthesis or from natural sources (3, 4), treatments are still based on the use of pentavalent antimonials, amphotericin B, miltefosine, pentamidine, or paromomycin, none of them is ideal.

The first-line treatment involves the pentavalent antimonials sodium stibogluconate and meglumine antimoniate, which display severe side effects, including nausea, diarrhea, skin rashes, hepatotoxicity, and cardiotoxicity and are associated with high death rates in HIV-coinfected patients. The polyene antibiotic amphotericin B and its liposomal formulation are second-line therapies and are highly effective in antimony-unresponsive patients, but they have limitations due to the compound's renal toxicity. Although liposomal amphotericin B is currently the most effective strategy, this drug is quite expensive, resulting in a high cost-effectiveness ratio (5). Paromomycin and pentamidine treatments have variable efficacy in different countries, but the use and availability of these drugs in regions where leishmaniasis is endemic is limited (2, 6). Miltefosine is the first orally administered treatment made available for leishmaniasis (7–9). Although it displays high efficacy in adults and children, there are many issues around its use, including potential teratogenicity, prolonged periods of treatment, severe side effects, and drug resistance (2, 10, 11).

The antiprotozoan activity of many metal-based compounds has been investigated and may offer new therapeutic options (12–18). Cyclopalladated compounds have been postulated as potential alternatives for leishmaniasis treatment (14–16). Some mechanistic studies described in the literature have shown that different metal compounds can inhibit the activity of DNA topoisomerase type 1 or 2 (19–22). DNA topoisomerases are ubiquitous enzymes that play important roles in cells such as DNA replication, transcription, recombination, and repair and have been identified in trypanosomatids (23–25). The DNA topoisomerase is essential for parasite viability, and the enzyme has been reported as a promising target for parasitic diseases (23–25). Type I DNA topoisomerase (Topo1) have been isolated from Leishmania donovani (26), T. cruzi (27), and Trypanosoma brucei (28), and the L. donovani and T. cruzi enzymes have been structurally characterized (25–27, 29). Among these protozoa, topoisomerase Topo1B is highly similar (89 to 95% amino acid sequence identity), but the parasite enzyme is structurally and/or functionally different from its human counterpart, making it suitable for drug design (25). Indeed, some DNA topoisomerases inhibitors include the anti-leishmanial compounds sodium stibogluconate and urea stibamine (23, 30).

In this work, we evaluated the antileishmanial in vitro and in vivo efficacy of the binuclear cyclopalladated complex CP2 and its potential spectrum of action against T. cruzi, as well as its possible mechanism of action involving DNA topoisomerase 1B inhibition.

RESULTS

Determination of the IC50 toward the insect stages of parasites.The antiprotozoal activity of CP2 (Fig. 1) was initially determined against the insect stages of L. amazonensis and T. cruzi, which are actively replicating in culture. It was determined that CP2 was biologically active against the promastigote and epimastigote forms of L. amazonensis and T. cruzi, respectively. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) for L. amazonensis promastigotes (13.2 μM) and T. cruzi epimastigotes (7 μM) showed that CP2 is approximately 2-fold more active than amphotericin B (23.1 μM) and has similar activity as benznidazole (4.1 μM), as shown in Table 1.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Structure of binuclear cyclopalladated complex CP2, [Pd(dmba)(μ-N3)]2 (61). A better model for [Pd(dmba)(N3)]2 is a blend of Lewis structures I and II with N1-N2 and N4-N5 intermediate in properties between a single and a double bond, with N2-N3 and N5-N6 between a double and a triple bond. This blending of structures is called resonance. The blended structure is a resonance hybrid of the contributing Lewis structures. A molecule does not flicker between different structures: a resonance hybrid is a blend of structures.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Antiparasitic activities, mammalian cell toxicities, and selective indices of CP2a

Effect of CP2 on murine macrophages and mammary adenocarcinoma cells LM3.The cytotoxicity of CP2 was evaluated against murine macrophages or LM3 cells. The results showed that CP2 presented lower cytotoxicity against macrophages (CC50 = 506.0 ± 10.7 μM), as well as LM3 cells (CC50 = 71.0 ± 4.0 μM), compared to the reference drugs pentamidine (CC50 = 35.7 ± 6.8 μM), amphotericin B (23.1 ± 2.5 μM), benznidazole (988.4 ± 38.1 μM), or cisplatin (30.3 ± 3.7 μM).

Effect of CP2 on L. amazonensis and T. cruzi intracellular amastigote forms.We further evaluated whether CP2 presented antiprotozoal activity against the intracellular amastigotes of L. amazonensis and T. cruzi, the clinically most relevant life cycle stages of the parasites in leishmaniasis and Chagas disease, respectively. Although the potency of CP2 (IC50 = 10.1 ± 2.2 μM; selective index [SI] = 49.9) for L. amazonensis intracellular amastigotes was two times lower than those of pentamidine (IC50 = 5.1 ± 1.1 μM; SI = 7.1) and amphotericin B (IC50 = 4.9 ± 0.1 μM; SI = 4.7), its selectivity to the parasite (SI = 50) was at least 10 times higher than that of the positive-control drugs. The cyclopalladated CP2 (IC50 = 2.3 ± 0.5 μM; SI = 224.9) was two times more potent than benznidazole (IC50 = 5.3 ± 1.4 μM; SI = 187.2) and highly selective to the parasite (Table 1).

Regarding the infection index (the percentage of infected cells × the number of the intracellular parasites), treatment with CP2 caused 68.5 and 74% reductions in the number of intracellular amastigotes parasites for L. amazonensis and T. cruzi, respectively (Fig. 2), while pentamidine and amphotericin B for L. amazonensis and benznidazole for T. cruzi caused 56, 65, and 47% parasite reductions, respectively.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

In vitro effect of CP2, pentamidine, and amphotericin B on L. amazonensis intracellular amastigotes (A) and in vitro effect of CP2 and benznidazole on T. cruzi intracellular amastigotes (B). The infection index was calculated after 72 h of treatment with the IC50s of each compounds. The negative control is L. amazonensis or T. cruzi intracellular amastigotes not treated with CP2. Data are expressed as averages plus the standard deviations (SD) for three independent experiments (P < 0.05).

Effect of CP2 on BALB/c mice infected with L. amazonensis.BALB/c mice infected with L. amazonensis (8 weeks postinfection) were treated for 35 days on a daily basis with two different doses of CP2 (0.2 or 0.35 mg/kg/day). A group of infected animals were treated with amphotericin B (2 mg/kg/day) on a daily basis from days 1 to 10, followed by an alternate base treatment from days 11 to 35. After 33 days of treatment, the animals treated with CP2 at both tested doses or with amphotericin B presented decreased lesion sizes compared to infected controls (animals infected and untreated and animals infected and treated with phosphate-buffered saline [PBS]; P < 0.05) as indicated in Fig. 3.

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

In vivo efficacies of CP2 and amphotericin B treatment in BALB/c mice infected with L. amazonensis. Development of foot lesions in L. amazonensis-infected BALB/c mice treated with CP2. The treatment was started 60 days after infection and continued for 35 days. Data points represent the average measurements for seven groups of eight mice each. The development of foot lesions was monitored three times a week. Values indicate the mean volume (volume = D × d × e, where D is the larger diameter, d is the minor diameter, and e is the thickness) of lesions in each group, and bars represent the SD. α, statistically significant difference from infected, nontreated animals (P < 0.05); β, statistically significant difference from infected animals treated with PBS (P < 0.05).

Regarding the parasite burden, BALB/c mice treated with 0.2 or 0.35 mg/kg/day of CP2 showed less skin parasitism in a dose-dependent manner compared to infected controls (P < 0.05). This represents decreases in parasitemia of 55 or 80% as determined from the Leishman-Donovan units (LDU index), whereas treatment with amphotericin B at 2 mg/kg/day of caused a similar reduction (83%) compared to CP2 at 0.35 mg/kg/day (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4).

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Quantitation of tissue parasite load of L. amazonensis in skin lesions of infected BALB/c mice using the LDU index (i.e., the number of Leishmania amastigotes in 1,000 nucleated cells per organ weight). The data are expressed as averages plus the SD. *, α, statistically significant difference relative to the control group (P ≤ 0.001, P ≤ 0.01); β, statistically significant difference relative to the group treated with PBS (P < 0.05). The negative controls were infected animals not treated with CP2.

Biomarkers of hepatic and renal function.Changes in liver function due to infection or different treatments were monitored by measuring the plasma levels of total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). Increased circulating levels of bilirubin were found in plasma of animals infected with L. amazonensis. For infected animals treated with amphotericin B or with CP2, no changes were observed in the bilirubin levels in compared to untreated infected animals (Fig. 5A). No differences were found in the plasma ALP levels among all studied groups (Fig. 5A).

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Plasma levels of biomarkers of liver and renal function in BALB/c mice noninfected and infected with L. amazonensis and treated with 0.20 or 0.35 mg/kg/day of CP2. (A) Total bilirubin and ALP levels; (B) ALT and AST levels; (C) urea and creatinine levels. The data are expressed as averages plus the SD. *, statistically significant difference with the noninfected animals (healthy animals) (P < 0.05); α, statistically significant difference with infected, untreated animals (P < 0.05); β, statistically significant difference with infected animals treated with PBS (P < 0.05).

Increased levels of ALT and AST were found in animals infected with L. amazonensis (untreated or treated with PBS). Treatment with amphotericin B prevented the liver damage of infected animals, since the ALT and AST levels were low. For infected animals treated with 0.35 mg/kg/day of CP2, both the ALT and the AST levels were similar to those of uninfected animals and of infected animals treated with amphotericin B (Fig. 5B). The evaluation of the renal function did not show significant changes for creatinine or urea levels in plasma of all animals (Fig. 5C).

In silico prediction of CP2 pharmacokinetic and toxicity properties.The ADMET (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity) properties of CP2 demonstrated that the cyclopalladated presented 92.96% predicted permeability for human intestinal absorption according to the data analyses presented in Table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Predicted ADMET properties of CP2 determined using the admetSAR tool

Inhibitory effect of CP2 on L. donovani topoisomerase 1B.The effect of CP2 on Ldtopo1B activity was analyzed by a supercoiled plasmid relaxation assay (Fig. 6A). The assay allows determination of the conversion of supercoiled plasmid DNA to relaxed forms due to the enzyme activity (Fig. 6A, compare lanes 1 and 3). In the presence of CP2, Ldtopo1B was characterized by a reduced relaxation capability of the substrate. The inhibition starts at a 3 μM concentration and becomes almost complete at 100 μM (Fig. 6A). Preincubation of the compound with the enzyme before substrate addition increased the efficiency of CP2, since a concentration of 12.5 μM was sufficient to completely inhibit the Leishmania enzyme (Fig. 6B, lanes 10 to 13). This result indicates that CP2 inhibition occurs through a direct interaction with the enzyme, likely binding at the active site although an indirect inhibition cannot be ruled out. Preincubation of the compound with DNA, before enzyme addition, did not affect the relaxation of the substrate by the enzyme (Fig. 6B, lanes 14 to 17). As a control, we performed the experiments in the presence of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at the same concentration as when added CP2 to the enzyme solution to demonstrate that, at this concentration of DMSO, the enzyme still works perfectly well (Fig. 6A, lane 3, and Fig. 6B, lanes 2 to 5).

FIG 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 6

(A) Relaxation of negative supercoiled plasmid DNA by L. donovani topoisomerase 1B (Ldtopo1B) in the presence of increasing concentrations of CP2 (lanes 4 to 13). Lane 1, only substrate; lane 2, substrate plus 300 μM CP2; lane 3, substrate plus Ldtopo1B enzyme. (B) Plasmid relaxation as a function of time in DMSO (at a concentration identical to that used to dissolve the CP2 compound) (lanes 2 to 5), 12.5 μM CP2 (lanes 6 to 9), 12.5 μM CP2 preincubated for 5 min with enzyme before DNA addition (lanes 10 to 13), 12.5 μM CP2 preincubated for 5 min with DNA before enzyme addition (lanes 14 to 17). NC, nicked circular plasmid DNA; SC, supercoiled plasmid DNA.

CP2 inhibits the cleavage step in the enzyme's catalytic cycle.The cleavage rate of Ldtopo1B was tested in a time course experiment incubating the enzyme with a linearized, partially duplex DNA substrate (Fig. 7A), labeled at its 5′ end with [γ-32P]ATP. The substrate is named “suicide substrate” because, after cutting at the preferential cleavage sites (CL1 and CL2), the di/tetranucleotide generated cannot be religated, and the enzyme remains covalently bound to the DNA (cleavage complex). The cleavage reaction is very fast in the absence of CP2; in fact, the bands corresponding to the cleavage complexes are fully formed after 15 s and remain constant as a function of time (Fig. 7B, lanes 2 to 10). In the presence of 150 μM CP2, the cleavage complex bands are not any more visible, indicating that Ldtopo1B is fully inhibited (Fig. 7B, lanes 11 to 19), permitting us to conclude that CP2 fully inhibits the cleavage reaction of Leishmania topoisomerase.

FIG 7
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 7

(A) CL1/CL2 suicide substrate used to measure the cleavage kinetics of the enzyme. *, preferential cleavage site (CL1); °, second cleavage site (CL2). (B) Gel analysis of Ldtopo1B cleavage kinetics in the absence (lanes 2 to 10) or presence (lanes 11 to 19) of 150 μM CP2 at various time points (0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 30 min). CL1, DNA fragment cleaved at the preferred site; CL2, second cleavage site.

DISCUSSION

The discovery of new, safe, and effective antileishmanial therapeutic agents is urgent because most currently used drugs have many problems that make treatment difficult, such as variable efficacy, severe side effects, long-term therapy, and high costs. The discovery of the antikinetoplastid activity of cisplatin (31) and its subsequent clinical development have pointed out that the chemotherapeutic properties of transition-metal complexes and the coordination of different ligands to metal is a possible strategy for finding new antileishmanial drugs. Indeed, several scaffolds of compounds containing palladium (17, 18, 32–34), platinum (35), gold (36), iridium (37), rhodium (38), and iron (39, 40) have shown antikinetoplastid activities.

The use of cyclopalladated complexes is preferable because of their higher thermodynamic and kinetic stability compared to other palladium(II) compounds whose fast hydrolysis and dissociation in solution lead to highly reactive species that are unable to reach the pharmacological targets (34). In this context, several research groups have explored the potential therapeutic applications of cyclopalladated complexes (34, 41–46). Regarding kinetoplastid diseases, it has been shown that cyclopalladated complexes were efficacious in reducing the parasite load in an in vivo leishmanial cutaneous model (18) and exhibited trypanocidal potential for Chagas disease treatment (17). More recently, Velásquez et al. showed the leishmanicidal and trypanocidal activities of a series of cyclopalladated compounds of the general formula [Pd(μ-X)(C2,N-dmba)]2 and [Pd(μ-X)(C2,N-dmba)(isn)], (C2,N-dmba=N,N′-dimethylbenzylamine; isn: isonicotinamide) against the intracellular amastigote forms of both L. amazonensis and T. cruzi (47), which were used to synthesize the CP2 derivative evaluated here.

The metal-based compound CP2 has shown leishmanicidal activity against L. amazonensis promastigotes and intracellular amastigotes. Although the observed leishmanicidal effect of CP2 (IC50 = 10.1 μM, SI = 49.9) toward intracellular amastigotes was half of that obtained with amphotericin B (IC50 = 4.9 μM, SI = 4.7), the cyclopalladated compound displayed 10-fold less toxicity to the peritoneal macrophages, as denoted by the SI values; additionally, CP2 was able to reduce the number of amastigotes in infected macrophages by 68.5%, similarly to amphotericin B in the in vitro assays carried out (Fig. 2A). Regarding the spectrum of activity, CP2 (IC50 = 2.3 μM; SI = 225) was 2-fold more effective than benznidazol (IC50 = 5.3 μM; SI = 187.2) against amastigotes of T. cruzi, making this compound very attractive for further evaluation in in vivo studies for its potential application in the therapy of Chagas disease.

The high potency of CP2 (IC50 = 10 μM) against intracellular amastigotes of L. amazonensis is in accordance with the Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative guidelines (48); this compelled us to explore its efficacy in an in vivo cutaneous leishmaniasis model. Treatment of L. amazonensis-infected mice with 0.35 mg/kg/day of CP2 through intraperitoneal administration, the first commonly used route in evaluating the potential effect of a compound, led to a significant reduction in parasite load in foot lesions (80%, as determined from the LDU). Although the reduction in the parasite burden in L. amazonensis-infected mice treated with CP2 was similar to that observed with amphotericin B (83%), the concentration of the amphotericin B was five times higher than that of CP2 and caused severely toxic effects to the animals, including weight loss at the beginning of treatment, cachexia, and nosebleeds, which were not observed in the group treated with CP2. Thus, at day 11 we followed the amphotericin B manufacturer's instruction of reducing the amphotericin B dosage in cases of severe toxic effects by switching from a daily to an alternate-day regimen until the end of the therapy course. Although CP2 did not result in a total cure in infected mice, it is worth noting that the BALB/c strain is highly susceptible to L. amazonensis infection (49), so it would be harder to eradicate. The plasma levels of hepatic and renal biomarkers after the treatment with CP2 did not show hepatobiliary disorders or renal failure (Fig. 5), which corroborates the low toxicity of cyclopalladated compounds reported in the literature (41). The altered dose regimen for amphotericin B might also have influenced the absence of toxic effects since hepatic and renal toxicity have been previously reported (50, 51). It is worth mentioning that in silico analysis to determine the safety and possible oral effectiveness of CP2 was carried out using the admetSAR tool (52) (Table 2). A compound is classified as orally effective when it demonstrates good absorption. Thus, the evaluated ADMET properties predicted that CP2 presents 92.96% of permeability for human intestinal absorption and 87.19% of permeability for the blood-brain barrier. With regard to metabolism, this molecule was classified as a nonsubstrate and a noninhibitor of a series of cytochrome P450 isoforms, although CP2 was shown to be a substrate for CYP450 3A4 (57.82%). Toxicity was also analyzed, and CP2 demonstrated the absence of carcinogenic toxicity and cardiotoxicity (noninhibitor for hERG). CP2 is also predicted as a mere class III risk for acute toxicity since it showed value for oral rat acute toxicity (LD50) of 2.7317 mg/kg (compounds with an LD50 greater than 500 mg/kg) (53). Taken together, these data suggest that CP2 is safe and orally absorbed.

Some mechanistic studies have demonstrated the ability of different metal compounds containing platinum, cadmium, copper, and gold to inhibit the activity of type 1 or 2 DNA topoisomerases (19–22). This could be due to the ability of inorganic drugs to coordinate the active site of the enzyme, blocking the enzyme-DNA interaction. Alternatively, the drugs could be coordinated to residues close to the active site, resulting in an altered enzyme structure (16); indeed, the antileishmanial pentavalent antimonial sodium stibogluconate inhibits the LdTopo1B (54). Based on this information, we decided to investigate whether CP2 is able to inhibit the activity of LdTopo1B DNA, the only one currently available for this kind of analysis (55).

Our in vitro results have shown that the relaxation activity of LdTopo1B is inhibited by CP2 and that the inhibition is dose dependent (Fig. 6 and 7). This suggests that this enzyme is targeted through the mechanism of CP2 treatment against Leishmania parasites, which has yet to be precisely elucidated. Preincubation of CP2 with the Ldtopo1B enzyme increased the inhibitory ability of the relaxation reaction, whereas incubation with DNA did not affect relaxation, demonstrating that CP2 has a high affinity for Ldtopo1B (Fig. 7). Together, these data suggest that CP2 can be classified as a catalytic DNA topoisomerase inhibitor (25).

It is well known that inhibition of DNA topoisomerases should affect mainly cell cycling cells such cancer cells (22, 56–59), but the toxicity assays performed here against the LM3 cells demonstrated that CP2 presents low selectivity for these cancer cells compared to Leishmania amastigotes, which could be indicative of the selectivity to the parasite's molecular target. It is worth noting that structural differences between human DNA topoisomerase I and LdTopo1B might be the reason of the higher selectivity of CP2 to the parasite over the LM3 cells. The human Topo1 is a monomeric enzyme composed of 765 residues, whereas the LdTopo1B is expressed from two open reading frames to produce a heterodimer consisting of a large 635-residue subunit (LdTOP1L) and a small 262-residue subunit (LdTOP1S) (30). In addition, CP2 was 2-fold less cytotoxic (71 μM) to LM3 than the antitumor drug cisplatin (30.3 μM), a potential inhibitor of human DNA topoisomerase II (60). This suggests that neither of the two human DNA topoisomerases might be a potent CP2 target. Altogether, the data presented here might explain the absence of toxicity reported in our in vivo assay.

Our data indicate that CP2 is very efficient due to its excellent biological activity against L. amazonensis, as well as T. cruzi, an indication of its potential wide action spectrum, high selectivity index, and great capacity to decrease parasite burden in in vivo experiments. In addition, its specific inhibitory effect on the topoisomerization of DNA catalyzed by LdTopo1B makes CP2 a good candidate for further exploration as a potential drug candidate against leishmaniasis and Chagas disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Compounds.Cyclometallated species represent an important class of compounds in organometallic chemistry due to their properties allowing many applications, including their use for therapeutic purposes such as antiprotozoal and anticancer treatments (61). The synthesis of CP2 and its precursors was carried out at room temperature. The binuclear cyclopalladated complex [Pd(dmba)(μ-N3)]2, here denominated CP2, was obtained as previously described (61). In summary, CP2 was prepared starting from 1.25 mmol of the compound [Pd(dmba)(μ-Cl)]2 (62, 63) and 2.5 mmol of NaN3 (Riedel-de Haën) in an acetone solution (Mallinckrodt). The mixture was stirred for 1 h, and the yellow solid was filtered off, washed with water and pentane (Merck), and dried in vacuo. The yield was 87%, with a melting point of 187°C (decomposition). The resulting CP2 and the reference drugs pentamidine isethionate (Sigma-Aldrich), amphotericin B (Cristalia, São Paulo, Brazil), and benznidazole (Sigma-Aldrich) were dissolved in DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich) and further diluted in culture media. Stock solutions were kept at −20°C. For in vivo experiments, stock solutions were prepared in PBS solution as a vehicle. The drugs were prepared daily, immediately before use.

Biological assays for parasites.Promastigotes of L. amazonensis strain MPRO/BR/1972/M1841-LV-79 and epimastigotes of T. cruzi strain Y were maintained at 28°C in a liver-infusion tryptose (LIT) medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco/Invitrogen) (64).

Evaluation of in vitro antiprotozoal activity.To determine the IC50 (the half-maximal inhibitory concentration), we used the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT; Sigma-Aldrich) colorimetric assay for L. amazonensis promastigotes and T. cruzi epimastigotes forms as previously described (47). Cells were plated in 96-well plates (TPP, Trasadingen, Switzerland) at a density of 107 parasites/ml (in a final volume of 100 μl) and incubated at 28°C in the presence of increasing concentrations of CP2 or reference drugs (from 0.5 to 100 μM) for 72 h for L. amazonensis and T. cruzi. The absorbance was then read in a plate reader (Robonik, Maharashtra, India) at 490 nm for Leishmania species according to the protocol as previously established in our laboratory and at 595 nm for T. cruzi (4, 47). The assays were carried out in triplicates, and data analysis and calculations of their IC50s were performed using the software Origin 7.0 (65).

Evaluation of cytotoxicity on murine macrophages and murine LM3 tumor cell lines.The cytotoxicity toward murine macrophages or LM3 cells was determined as previously described (66). In summary, for mouse peritoneal macrophages, the cells were collected from adult male Swiss albino mice (20 to 35 g) and seeded in 96-well flat-bottom plates at a density of 105 cells/well (100 μl/well) in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 25 mM HEPES, and 2 mM l-glutamine, followed by incubation for 24 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2-air mixture. For in vitro assay against murine mammary LM3, cells were maintained in minimum essential medium (Sigma) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 2 mM l-glutamine, and gentamicin at 50 µg/ml in plastic flasks (TPP) at 37°C in a 5% CO2-air mixture. The number of cells was determined by the trypan blue dye exclusion method. LM3 cells were adjusted to a density of 5 × 104 cells/ml and transferred to each well of a 96-well flat-bottom plate. All cells used for cytotoxicity studies were preincubated for 24 h to allow the cells to adapt prior to the addition of the test compounds. Then, the supernatants were removed, and new medium was added containing different concentrations of CP2 or the reference drugs ranging from 1.25 to 100 μM.

Positive (with amphotericin B, pentamidine isethionate, benznidazole, or cisplatin) and negative (without drugs) controls were included. Plates were then incubated under the same conditions for 24 h to be used for a MTT colorimetric assay, which was carried out as previously described (67). The absorbance was then read in a 96-well plate reader at 595 nm. The drug concentration that corresponds to 50% of cell growth inhibition is expressed as the 50% cytotoxic concentration (CC50). The cytotoxicity for host cells and protozoan species were compared and expressed as the selectivity index (SI), which was defined as the ratio of the CC50 for macrophages to the IC50 for protozoan species.

Differentiation of T. cruzi epimastigote and trypomastigote forms. In vitro differentiation of T. cruzi was performed according to the literature (68). Briefly, epimastigotes from a stationary culture in LIT medium were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 15 min at 10°C (Eppendorf) and cultured in freshly prepared LIT medium for another 48 h at 28°C supplemented with triatomine artificial urine (TAU; prepared in 190 mM NaCl, 8 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.0), 17 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, and 0.6 mM NaHCO3). Cultures were then incubated in a medium supplemented with TAU and 10 mM l-proline (TAUP medium) at 27°C for 10 days.

Evaluation of in vitro activity against L. amazonensis and T. cruzi intracellular amastigotes.To determine the leishmanicidal and trypanocidal activity of CP2 and reference drugs against intracellular amastigotes of L. amazonensis and T. cruzi, murine peritoneal macrophages were plated at a density of 3 × 105 cells/well on coverslips (13 mm in diameter), previously arranged in a 24-well plate in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS. The cells were then allowed to adhere for 4 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 (69). Adherent macrophages were infected with L. amazonensis promastigotes or T. cruzi trypomastigotes in the stationary growth phase (using ratios of 5:1 and 10:1 parasites per macrophage, respectively) at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 4 h for L. amazonensis and 24 h for T. cruzi. The noninternalized parasites were then removed by washing, and infected cultures were incubated in RPMI 1640 medium for 24 h at 37 ± 2°C in 5% CO2 to allow parasite multiplication. The infected cells were then treated with different concentrations of CP2, pentamidine isethionate, amphotericin B, or benznidazole for 24 h. After incubation, the cells were fixed with methanol, stained with Giemsa, and examined using optical microscopy (Opton). The infection index was determined by multiplying the percentage of infected macrophages by the mean number of amastigotes per infected cells. The concentration that resulted in a 50% decrease of growth inhibition compared to the control was determined by regression analysis and expressed as IC50 in μM (47).

Antileishmanial in vivo assays.For evaluation of in vivo leishmanicidal activity of CP2, female BALB/c mice (20 to 25 g; 4 weeks old; CEMIB, UNICAMP) were subcutaneously inoculated at the right hind-footpad with 107 infective promastigotes of L. amazonensis in 10 μl of PBS (early stationary phase of growth). After 8 weeks, when the lesions presented a diameter of 5 to 7 mm, the animals were randomly separated into four groups of eight animals each. Treated animals received 0.20 or 0.35 mg/kg (body weight)/day of CP2 for 35 days. Stock solutions of CP2 were prepared daily in 1× PBS after solubilization in DMSO (final concentration, 0.1%). Negative controls correspond to infected and nontreated mice, as well as those that received the same number of injections with 1× PBS (vehicle). As positive control, a group of mice received 2 mg/kg/day of amphotericin B, and a group of uninfected and untreated mice (healthy animals) was used for the analysis. The compound was administered intraperitoneally daily for 35 days. Infection was monitored three times a week by measuring the thickness of the foot lesions with a dial caliper (Mitutoyo Corp., Japan). Treatment efficacy was determined by measuring the parasite burden of infected feet using the LDU index (70).

LDU index.BALB/c mice were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation, and necropsies were performed for parasitological diagnoses of tissue smears. Parasites were counted from Giemsa-stained tissue impression smears and examined using optical microscopy for the identification of amastigote forms of Leishmania. The parasite density evaluation was performed, and the results were expressed as the LDU index, according to Stauber (70) and other authors (71–73); these data correspond to the number of amastigotes in 1,000 nucleated cells/organ weight.

In silico prediction of CP2 pharmacokinetic and toxicity properties.For determination of the safety and potential of oral absorption of CP2, the ADMET properties were evaluated by using the admetSAR tool (52). The SMILES (simplified molecular-input line-entry system) used for in silico analysis was as follows: [N][N]N1[Pd]23([N](C([H])([H])[H])(C([H])([H])[H])C([H])([H])C4C3C(C(C(C4[H])[H])[H])[H])[Pd]15([N](C([H])([H])[H])(C([H])([H])[H])C([H])([H])C6C5C(C(C(C6[H])[H])[H])[H])N2[N][N].

Toxicity for mice assays.Plasma concentrations of total bilirubin, ALT and AST, ALP, urea, and creatinine were determined in BALB/c mice at the end of the treatments using commercial kits (Labtest Diagnostica S.A., Brazil). The following principles were used in these methods to determine concentration: AST, continuous kinetic monitoring, coupled with malate dehydrogenase (74); ALT, continuous kinetic monitoring, coupled with lactate dehydrogenase (75); ALP, colorimetric method based on the rate of hydrolysis of p-nitrophenyl phosphate (76); total bilirubin, azobilirubin formation in the presence of diazotized dichloroaniline (77, 78); creatinine, chromogen formation with picrate in alkaline medium (79); and urea, the urease method (80). Blood plasma samples, collected from blood samples obtained by cardiac puncture in the presence of heparin at 5,000 IU/ml (Hemofol; Cristalia) and centrifuged at 2,500 × g for 10 min at 4°C, were stored at −20°C until ready for analyzing the changes in the biomarkers of hepatic and renal function. Assays were performed by spectrophotometric system identification in a semiautomated biochemical analyzer.

Ldtopo1B expression.To express the full-length L. donovani topoisomerase 1B (Ldtopo1B), the plasmid pESCLdTOP1A-LdTOP1B-URA (kindly donated by Rafael Balaña Fouce), with the inducible promoters GAL1 and GAL10 was used. This plasmid was used to transform a Saccharomyces cerevisiae EKY3 strain deficient in DNA topoisomerase I activity (MATα ura3-52 his3Δ200 leu2Δ1 trp163 top1 D::TRP1), as previously described (56). Transformed cells were selected on solid synthetic complement (SC)-uracil medium plus 2% dextrose at 30°C, transferred into liquid SC-uracil medium plus 2% dextrose, and grown overnight at 30°C and 140 rpm. At an optical density at 600 nm between 1 and 3, the cells were diluted 1:100 in SC-uracil plus 2% raffinose and induced for protein production by the application of 2% galactose for 6 h. Cells were harvested by centrifugation (4,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C), washed with cold water, resuspended at the ratio of 1 g (wet weight) of cells/2 ml of TEEG buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 10% [vol/vol] glycerol), and supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail (sodium bisulfite, 0.1 mg/ml; NaF, 0.8 mg/ml; 2× Complete Mini) according to the manufacturer's instructions (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, catalog no. 1836153). The cells were stored at −80°C.

Ldtopo1B protein purification.After the cells were thawed, 0.5 volumes of 425- to 600-μm glass beads were added to the cell suspension, and the cells were disrupted with 30 repetitions of 30-s vortexing each time, followed by a 30-s incubation on ice. The lysate was clarified by centrifugation (15,000 × g, 30 min), and the proteins were subjected to successive ammonium sulfate fractionations. A 35% saturation was obtained by adding ammonium sulfate to the extract (19.4 g/100 ml) and permitting the mixture to dissolve by rocking at 4°C for 60 min. The precipitates were removed by centrifugation (15,000 × g, 30 min), and the supernatant was then adjusted to 75% saturation in solid ammonium sulfate (25.4 g/100 ml) with gentle rocking at 4°C overnight. The precipitates were recovered by centrifugation (15,000 × g, 30 min) and resuspended in TEEG buffer–200 mM KCl, loaded onto a P11 resin equilibrated in the same buffer. Elution of Ldtopo1B was performed at 4°C in TEEG buffer supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail, 0.1 mg/ml sodium bisulfite, and 0.8 mg/ml sodium fluoride, with a discontinuous gradient of KCl (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1 M). Ldtopo1B was eluted at between 0.4 and 0.6 M KCl.

Ldtopo1B relaxation assay.In order to determine the concentration of the eluted Ldtopo1B (in U/μl), 1 μl of enzyme solution was diluted 3-, 9-, 27-, and 81-fold in reaction buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl, 0.1 mM Na2EDTA, 10 mM CaCl2, 50 µg/ml acetylated bovine serum albumin [BSA], and 150 mM KCl [pH 7.5]) before the addition of 0.5 µg of negatively supercoiled pBluescript KSII(+) DNA (standard conditions) in a 30-μl reaction volume. Each reaction of Ldtopo1B was incubated at 37°C for 30 min. One unit of enzyme is defined as the amount required to completely relax 0.5 μg of negative supercoiled plasmid DNA in 30 min at 37°C.

One unit of the eluted Ldtopo1B was assayed in a 20-μl reaction volume containing negatively supercoiled pBluescript KSII(+) DNA according to the standard conditions described above. Increasing concentrations of CP2 (0 to 300 µM) were added to each reaction mixture, which were stopped with a final concentration of 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) after 30 min or after each time course point (1, 7.5, 15, and 30 min) at 37°C. The samples were electrophoresed in a horizontal 1% agarose gel in 50 mM Tris, 45 mM boric acid, and 1 mM EDTA, which was then stained with ethidium bromide (5 µg/ml), destained with water, and photographed under UV illumination. Assays were performed at least three times on one representative gel.

Ldtopo1B cleavage assays.The oligonucleotide CL1 (5′-GAAAAAAGACTTAG-3′) radiolabeled with [γ-32P]ATP at its 5′ end was annealed with a 2-fold molar excess of CL2 complementary strand (5′-TAAAAATTTTTCTAAGTCTTTTTTC-3′) (20) to produce a partially duplex substrate with a single-strand extension of 11 nucleotides called “suicide substrate” (Fig. 7). The cleavage reactions were carried out by incubating a 20 nM concentration of the suicide substrate with 2.5 U of enzyme in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.1 mM Na2EDTA, 10 mM CaCl2, 50 μg/ml acetylated BSA, and 150 mM KCl at 23°C. A 5-μl sample of the reaction mixture was taken before addition of the enzyme. At various time points, 5-μl aliquots were taken, and the reaction stopped in each one by using 0.5% SDS. After ethanol precipitation, the samples were resuspended in 5 μl of trypsin at 1 mg/ml, followed by incubation at 37°C for 30 min. Reaction products were analyzed in denaturing 20% acrylamide–7 M urea gels and visualized with a PhosphorImager.

Ethics statement.Animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Experimentation of São Paulo State University (UNESP), the School of Pharmaceutical Sciences (CEUA/FCF/CAr, 20/2013 and 37/2013; CEUA/FCF/CAr, 25/2014 and 30/2014) in agreement with the guidelines of the Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência de Animais de Laboratorio (SBCAL) and of the Conselho Nacional de Controle da Experimentação Animal (CONCEA).

Statistical analysis.The statistical differences between groups were evaluated using one-way analysis of variance, followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls multiple -comparison test (using GraphPad InStat software). Differences were considered significant when P values were ≤0.05.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) for financial support grant 2013/08248-1, the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), and Programa de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Científico da Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas da UNESP (PADC). A.M.A.V., A.R.R., and T.G.P. were supported by CAPES fellowships. R.P.D.A. was supported by a CNPq fellowship.

We are also grateful to Greg Matlashewski, Paul A. Michels, and Pio Colepicolo Neto for critical review of the manuscript and Samantha J. Thomas for the English revision.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 3 April 2017.
    • Accepted 2 May 2017.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 15 May 2017.
  • Copyright © 2017 Velásquez et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license .

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Murray HW,
    2. Berman JD,
    3. Davies CR,
    4. Saravia NG
    . 2005. Advances in leishmaniasis. Lancet366:1561–1577. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67629-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Singh N,
    2. Kumar M,
    3. Singh RK
    . 2012. Leishmaniasis: current status of available drugs and new potential drug targets. Asian Pac J Trop Med5:485–497. doi:10.1016/S1995-7645(12)60084-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Torres FA,
    2. Passalacqua TG,
    3. Velásquez AM,
    4. de Souza RA,
    5. Colepicolo P,
    6. Graminha MA
    . 2014. New drugs with antiprotozoal activity from marine algae: a review. Braz J Pharmacogn24:265–276. doi:10.1016/j.bjp.2014.07.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Santos VA,
    2. Regasini LO,
    3. Nogueira CR,
    4. Passerini GD,
    5. Martinez I,
    6. Bolzani VS,
    7. Graminha MA,
    8. Cicarelli RM,
    9. Furlan M
    . 2012. Antiprotozoal sesquiterpene pyridine alkaloids from Maytenus ilicifolia. J Nat Prod75:991–995. doi:10.1021/np300077r.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Meheus F,
    2. Balasegaram M,
    3. Olliaro P,
    4. Sundar S,
    5. Rijal S,
    6. Faiz MA,
    7. Boelaert M
    . 2010. Cost-effectiveness analysis of combination therapies for visceral leishmaniasis in the Indian subcontinent. PLoS Negl Trop Dis4:e818. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000818.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Van Griensven J,
    2. Diro E
    . 2012. Visceral leishmaniasis. Infect Dis Clin North Am26:309–322. doi:10.1016/j.idc.2012.03.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Sundar S,
    2. Rai M
    . 2002. Advances in the treatment of leishmaniasis. Curr Opin Infect Dis15:593–598. doi:10.1097/00001432-200212000-00007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Singh S,
    2. Sivakumar R
    . 2004. Challenges and new discoveries in the treatment of leishmaniasis. J Infect Chemother10:307–315. doi:10.1007/s10156-004-0348-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Dorlo TPC,
    2. Balasegaram M,
    3. Beijnen JH,
    4. de Vries PJ
    . 2012. Miltefosine: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of leishmaniasis. J Antimicrob Chemother67:2576–2597. doi:10.1093/jac/dks275.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    World Health Organization. 2010. Control of the leishmaniases: report of a meeting of the WHO Expert Committee on the Control of Leishmaniasis. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  11. 11.↵
    1. Barrett MP,
    2. Croft SL
    . 2012. Management of trypanosomiasis and leishmaniasis. Br Med Bull104:175–196. doi:10.1093/bmb/lds031.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Farrell NP,
    2. Williamson J,
    3. McLaren DJM
    . 1984. Trypanocidal and antitumour activity of platinum-metal and platinum-metal-drug dual-function complexes. Biochem Pharmacol33:961–971. doi:10.1016/0006-2952(84)90501-X.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Zinsstag J,
    2. Brun R,
    3. Craciunescu DG,
    4. Parrondo Iglesias E
    . 1991. In vitro activity of organometallic complexes of iridium, platinum, and rhodium on Trypanosoma b. gambiense, T. b. rhodesiense, and T. b. brucei. Trop Med Parasitol42:41–44.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Sánchez-Delgado RA,
    2. Anzellotti A
    . 2004. Metal complexes as chemotherapeutic agents against tropical diseases: trypanosomiasis, malaria, and leishmaniasis. Mini-Reviews Med Chem4:23–30. doi:10.2174/1389557043487493.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Fricker SP,
    2. Mosi RM,
    3. Cameron BR,
    4. Baird I,
    5. Zhu Y,
    6. Anastassov V,
    7. Cox J,
    8. Doyle PS,
    9. Hansell E,
    10. Lau G,
    11. Langille J,
    12. Olsen M,
    13. Qin L,
    14. Skerlj R,
    15. Wong RSY,
    16. Santucci Z,
    17. McKerrow JH
    . 2008. Metal compounds for the treatment of parasitic diseases. J Inorg Biochem102:1839–1845. doi:10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2008.05.010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Navarro M,
    2. Gabbiani C,
    3. Messori L,
    4. Gambino D
    . 2010. Metal-based drugs for malaria, trypanosomiasis, and leishmaniasis: recent achievements and perspectives. Drug Discov Today15:1070–1078. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2010.10.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Matsuo AL,
    2. Silva LS,
    3. Torrecilhas AC,
    4. Pascoalino BS,
    5. Ramos TC,
    6. Rodrigues EG,
    7. Schenkman S,
    8. Caires AC,
    9. Travassos LR
    . 2010. In vitro and in vivo trypanocidal effects of the cyclopalladated compound 7a, a drug candidate for treatment of Chagas' disease. Antimicrob Agents Chemother54:3318–3325. doi:10.1128/AAC.00323-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Paladi CD,
    2. Pimentel IA,
    3. Katz S,
    4. Cunha RL,
    5. Judice WA,
    6. Caires AC,
    7. Barbiéri CL
    . 2012. In vitro and in vivo activity of a palladacycle complex on Leishmania amazonensis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis6:e1626. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001626.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Casini A,
    2. Kelter G,
    3. Gabbiani C,
    4. Cinellu MA,
    5. Minghetti G,
    6. Fregona D,
    7. Fiebig HH,
    8. Messori L
    . 2009. Chemistry, antiproliferative properties, tumor selectivity, and molecular mechanisms of novel gold(III) compounds for cancer treatment: a systematic study. J Biol Inorg Chem14:1139–1149. doi:10.1007/s00775-009-0558-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Castelli S,
    2. Vassallo O,
    3. Katkar P,
    4. Che CM,
    5. Sun RW,
    6. Desideri A
    . 2011. Inhibition of human DNA topoisomerase IB by a cyclometalated gold III compound: analysis on the different steps of the enzyme catalytic cycle. Arch Biochem Biophys516:108–112. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2011.10.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Wu X,
    2. Yalowich JC,
    3. Hasinoff BB
    . 2011. Cadmium is a catalytic inhibitor of DNA topoisomerase II. J Inorg Biochem105:833–838. doi:10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2011.02.007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Neves AP,
    2. Pereira MX,
    3. Peterson EJ,
    4. Kipping R,
    5. Vargas MD,
    6. Silva FP Jr,
    7. Carneiro JW,
    8. Farrell NP
    . 2013. Exploring the DNA binding/cleavage, cellular accumulation and topoisomerase inhibition of 2-hydroxy-3-(aminomethyl)-1,4-naphthoquinone mannich bases and their platinum(II) complexes. J Inorg Biochem119:54–64. doi:10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2012.10.007.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    1. Brata Das B,
    2. Sen N,
    3. Ganguly A,
    4. Majumder HK
    . 2004. Reconstitution and functional characterization of the unusual bi-subunit type I DNA topoisomerase from Leishmania donovani. FEBS Lett565:81–88. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2004.03.078.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Chawla B,
    2. Madhubala R
    . 2010. Drug targets in leishmania. J Parasit Dis34:1–13. doi:10.1007/s12639-010-0006-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. D'Annessa I,
    2. Castelli S,
    3. Desideri A
    . 2015. Topoisomerase 1B as a target against leishmaniasis. Mini Rev Med Chem15:203–210. doi:10.2174/138955751503150312120912.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    1. Chakraborty AK,
    2. Gupta A,
    3. Majumder HK
    . 1993. A type 1 DNA topoisomerase from the kinetoplast hemoflagellate Leishmania donovani. Indian J Biochem Biophys30:257–263.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Riou GF,
    2. Gabillot M,
    3. Douc-Rasy S,
    4. Kayser A,
    5. Barrois M
    . 1983. A type I DNA topoisomerase from Trypanosoma cruzi. Eur J Biochem134:479–484. doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1983.tb07592.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Bodley AL,
    2. Chakraborty AK,
    3. Xie S,
    4. Burri C,
    5. Shapiro TA
    . 2003. An unusual type IB topoisomerase from African trypanosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A100:7539–7544.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Broccoli S,
    2. Marquis JF,
    3. Papadopoulou B,
    4. Olivier M,
    5. Drolet M
    . 1999. Characterization of a Leishmania donovani gene encoding a protein that closely resembles a type IB topoisomerase. Nucleic Acids Res27:2745–2752. doi:10.1093/nar/27.13.2745.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Davies DR,
    2. Mushtaq A,
    3. Interthal H,
    4. Champoux JJ,
    5. Hol WGJ
    . 2006. The structure of the transition state of the heterodimeric topoisomerase I of Leishmania donovani as a vanadate complex with nicked DNA. J Mol Biol357:1202–1210. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2006.01.022.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Rosenberg B,
    2. Vancamp L,
    3. Krigas T
    . 1965. Inhibition of cell division in Escherichia coli by electrolysis products from a platinum electrode. Nature205:698–699. doi:10.1038/205698a0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Otero L,
    2. Vieites M,
    3. Boiani L,
    4. Denicola A,
    5. Rigol C,
    6. Opazo L,
    7. Olea-Azar C,
    8. Maya JD,
    9. Morello A,
    10. Krauth-Siegel RL,
    11. Piro OE,
    12. Castellano E,
    13. González M,
    14. Gambino D,
    15. Cerecetto H
    . 2006. Novel antitrypanosomal agents based on palladium nitrofurylthiosemicarbazone complexes: DNA and redox metabolism as potential therapeutic targets. J Med Chem49:3322–3331. doi:10.1021/jm0512241.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Vieites M,
    2. Otero L,
    3. Santos D,
    4. Toloza J,
    5. Figueroa R,
    6. Norambuena E,
    7. Olea-Azar C,
    8. Aguirre G,
    9. Cerecetto H,
    10. González M,
    11. Morello A,
    12. Maya JD,
    13. Garat B,
    14. Gambino D
    . 2008. Platinum(II) metal complexes as potential anti-Trypanosoma cruzi agents. J Inorg Biochem102:1033–1043. doi:10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2007.12.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Caires AC,
    2. Almeida ET,
    3. Mauro AE,
    4. Hemerly JP,
    5. Valentini SR
    . 1999. Síntese e atividade citotóxica de alguns azido-ciclopaladados estabilizados com ligantes bifosfínicos. Quim Nova22:329–334. doi:10.1590/S0100-40421999000300008.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. 35.↵
    1. Santos D,
    2. Parajón-Costa B,
    3. Rossi M,
    4. Caruso F,
    5. Benítez D,
    6. Varela J,
    7. Cerecetto H,
    8. González M,
    9. Gómez N,
    10. Caputto ME,
    11. Moglioni AG,
    12. Moltrasio GY,
    13. Finkielsztein LM,
    14. Gambino D
    . 2012. Activity on Trypanosoma cruzi, erythrocytes lysis and biologically relevant physicochemical properties of Pd(II) and Pt(II) complexes of thiosemicarbazones derived from 1-indanones. J Inorg Biochem117:270–276. doi:10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2012.08.024.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Vieites M,
    2. Smircich P,
    3. Guggeri L,
    4. Marchán E,
    5. Gómez-barrio A,
    6. Navarro M,
    7. Garat B,
    8. Gambino D
    . 2009. Synthesis and characterization of a pyridine-2-thiol N-oxide gold(I) complex with potent antiproliferative effect against Trypanosoma cruzi and Leishmania sp. insight into its mechanism of action. Q J Inorg Biochem103:1300–1306. doi:10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2009.02.011.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. 37.↵
    1. Croft SL,
    2. Neal RA,
    3. Craciunescu DG,
    4. Certadfombona G
    . 1992. The activity of platinum, iridium, and rhodium drug complexes against Leishmania donovani. Trop Med Parasitol43:24–28.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Rodriguez-Cabezas MN,
    2. Mesa-Valle CM,
    3. Azzouz S,
    4. Moraleda-Lindez V,
    5. Craciunescu D,
    6. Gutierrez-Rios MT,
    7. De Frutos MI,
    8. Osuna A
    . 2001. In vitro and in vivo activity of new rhodium(III) complexes against Leishmania donovani. Pharmacology63:112–119. doi:10.1159/000056121.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Silva ML,
    2. Neto AF,
    3. Cardoso SA,
    4. Albuquerque S,
    5. Miller J
    . 2002. Synthesis and “in vitro” trypanocidal activity evaluation of some organo-iron compounds. Met drugs8:329–332. doi:10.1155/MBD.2002.329.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. 40.↵
    1. Velásquez AM,
    2. Francisco AI,
    3. Kohatsu AA,
    4. Silva FA,
    5. Rodrigues DF,
    6. Teixeira RG,
    7. Chiari BG,
    8. De Almeida MG,
    9. Isaac VL,
    10. Vargas MD,
    11. Cicarelli RM
    . 2014. Synthesis and tripanocidal activity of ferrocenyl and benzyl diamines against Trypanosoma brucei and Trypanosoma cruzi. Bioorganic Med Chem Lett24:1707–1710. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.02.046.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. 41.↵
    1. Rodrigues EG,
    2. Silva LS,
    3. Fausto DM,
    4. Hayashi MS,
    5. Dreher S,
    6. Santos EL,
    7. Pesquero JB,
    8. Travassos LR,
    9. Caires ACF
    . 2003. Cyclopalladated compounds as chemotherapeutic agents: antitumor activity against a murine melanoma cell line. Int J Cancer107:498–504. doi:10.1002/ijc.11434.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. de Souza RA,
    2. Stevanato A,
    3. Treu-Filho O,
    4. Netto AV,
    5. Mauro AE,
    6. Castellano EE,
    7. Carlos IZ,
    8. Pavan FR,
    9. Leite CQ
    . 2010. Antimycobacterial and antitumor activities of palladium(II) complexes containing isonicotinamide (isn): X-ray structure of trans-[Pd(N3)2(isn)2]. Eur J Med Chem45:4863–4868. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.07.057.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Moro AC,
    2. Mauro AE,
    3. Netto AV,
    4. Ananias SR,
    5. Quilles MB,
    6. Carlos IZ,
    7. Pavan FR,
    8. Leite CQ,
    9. Hörner M
    . 2009. Antitumor and antimycobacterial activities of cyclopalladated complexes: X-ray structure of [Pd(C2,N-dmba)(Br)(tu)] (dmba=N,N-dimethylbenzylamine, tu=thiourea). Eur J Med Chem44:4611–4615. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.06.032.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Moro AC,
    2. Urbaczek AC,
    3. De Almeida ET,
    4. Pavan FR,
    5. Leite CQ,
    6. Netto AV,
    7. Mauro AE
    . 2012. Binuclear cyclopalladated compounds with antitubercular activity: synthesis and characterization of [{Pd(C2,N-dmba)(X)} 2(μ-bpp)] (X=Cl, Br, NCO, N 3; bpp=1,3-bis(4-pyridyl)propane). J Coord Chem65:1434–1442. doi:10.1080/00958972.2012.673718.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. 45.↵
    1. Da Rocha MC,
    2. Santana AM,
    3. Ananias SR,
    4. De Almeida ET,
    5. Mauro AE,
    6. Placeres MC,
    7. Carlos IZ
    . 2007. Cytotoxicity and immune response induced by organopalladium(II) compounds in mice bearing Ehrlich ascites tumour. J Braz Chem Soc18:1473–1480. doi:10.1590/S0103-50532007000800004.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  46. 46.↵
    1. Spencer J,
    2. Rathnam RP,
    3. Motukuri M,
    4. Kotha AK,
    5. Richardson SC,
    6. Hazrati A,
    7. Hartley JA,
    8. Male L,
    9. Hursthouse MB
    . 2009. Synthesis of a 1,4-benzodiazepine containing palladacycle with in vitro anticancer and cathepsin B activity. Dalt Trans22:4299–4303. doi:10.1039/b819061e.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  47. 47.↵
    1. Velásquez AM,
    2. De Souza RA,
    3. Passalacqua TG,
    4. Ribeiro AR,
    5. Scontri M,
    6. Chin CM,
    7. De Almeida L,
    8. Del Cistia ML,
    9. Da Rosa JA,
    10. Mauro AE,
    11. Graminha MA
    . 2016. Antiprotozoal activity of the cyclopalladated complexes against Leishmania amazonensis and Trypanosoma cruzi. J Braz Chem Soc27:1032–1039.
    OpenUrl
  48. 48.↵
    1. Katsuno K,
    2. Burrows JN,
    3. Duncan K,
    4. van Huijsduijnen RH,
    5. Kaneko T,
    6. Kita K,
    7. Mowbray CE,
    8. Schmatz D,
    9. Warner P,
    10. Slingsby BT
    . 2015. Hit and lead criteria in drug discovery for infectious diseases of the developing world. Nat Rev Drug Discov14:751–758. doi:10.1038/nrd4683.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Lainson R,
    2. Shaw JJ
    . 1987. Evolution, classification, and geographical distribution, p 1–120. InKillick-Kendrick R, Peters W (ed), The leishmaniases in biology and medicine. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom.
  50. 50.↵
    1. Wortmann G,
    2. Zapor M,
    3. Ressner R,
    4. Fraser S,
    5. Hartzell J,
    6. Pierson J,
    7. Weintrob A,
    8. Magill A
    . 2010. Liposomal amphotericin B for treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg83:1028–1033. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0171.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    1. Gill J,
    2. Sprenger HR,
    3. Ralph ED,
    4. Sharpe MD
    . 1999. Hepatotoxicity possibly caused by amphotericin B. Ann Pharmacother33:683–685. doi:10.1345/aph.18181.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. 52.↵
    1. Cheng F,
    2. Li W,
    3. Zhou Y,
    4. Shen J,
    5. Wu Z,
    6. Liu G,
    7. Lee PW,
    8. Tang Y
    . 2012. admetSAR: a comprehensive source and free tool for assessment of chemical ADMET properties. J Chem Inform Modeling52:3099–3105. doi:10.1021/ci300367a.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Li X,
    2. Chen L,
    3. Cheng F,
    4. Wu Z,
    5. Bian H,
    6. Xu C,
    7. Li W,
    8. Liu G,
    9. Shen X,
    10. Tang Y
    . 2014. In silico prediction of chemical acute oral toxicity using multi-classification methods. J Chem Infect Model54:1061–1069. doi:10.1021/ci5000467.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  54. 54.↵
    1. Chakraborty AK,
    2. Majumder HK
    . 1988. Mode of action of pentavalent antimonials: specific inhibition of type I DNA topoisomerase of Leishmania donovani. Biochem Biophys Res Commun152:605–611. doi:10.1016/S0006-291X(88)80081-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. Balaña-Fouce R,
    2. Álvarez-Velilla R,
    3. Fernández-Prada C,
    4. García-Estrada C,
    5. Reguera RM
    . 2014. Trypanosomatids topoisomerase revisited: new structural findings and role in drug discovery. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist4:326–337. doi:10.1016/j.ijpddr.2014.07.006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    1. Bjornsti MA,
    2. Benedetti P,
    3. Viglianti GA,
    4. Wang JC
    . 1989. Expression of human DNA topoisomerase I in yeast cells lacking yeast DNA topoisomerase I: restoration of sensitivity of the cells to the antitumor drug camptothecin. Cancer Res49:6318–6323.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. 57.↵
    1. Kiechle FL,
    2. Zhang X
    . 2002. Apoptosis: biochemical aspects and clinical implications. Clin Chim Acta326:27–45. doi:10.1016/S0009-8981(02)00297-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  58. 58.↵
    1. Walker J,
    2. Saravia NG
    . 2004. Inhibition of Leishmania donovani promastigote DNA topoisomerase I and human monocyte DNA topoisomerases I and II by antimonial drugs and classical antitopoisomerase agents. J Parasitol90:1155–1162. doi:10.1645/GE-3347.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    1. Prada CF,
    2. Álvarez-Velilla R,
    3. Balaña-Fouce R,
    4. Prieto C,
    5. Calvo-Álvarez E,
    6. Escudero-Martínez JM,
    7. Requena JM,
    8. Ordóñez C,
    9. Desideri A,
    10. Pérez-Pertejo Y,
    11. Reguera RM
    . 2013. Gimatecan and other camptothecin derivatives poison Leishmania DNA-topoisomerase IB leading to a strong leishmanicidal effect. Biochem Pharmacol85:1433–1440. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2013.02.024.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  60. 60.↵
    1. Hasinoff BB,
    2. Wu X,
    3. Krokhin OV,
    4. Ens W,
    5. Standing KG,
    6. Nitiss JL,
    7. Sivaram T,
    8. Giorgianni A,
    9. Yang S,
    10. Jiang Y,
    11. Yalowich JC
    . 2005. Biochemical and proteomics approaches to characterize topoisomerase IIα cysteines and DNA as targets responsible for cisplatin-induced inhibition of topoisomerase IIα. Mol Pharmacol67:937–947. doi:10.1124/mol.104.004416.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. 61.↵
    1. de Almeida ET,
    2. Mauro AE,
    3. Santana AM,
    4. Ananias SR,
    5. Netto AV,
    6. Ferreira JG,
    7. Santos RH
    . 2007. Self-assembly of organometallic Pd(II) complexes via CH3 interactions: the first example of a cyclopalladated compound with herringbone stacking pattern. Inorg Chem Commun (Camb)10:1394–1398. doi:10.1016/j.inoche.2007.08.020.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  62. 62.↵
    1. Cope AC,
    2. Friedrich EC
    . 1968. Electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions by platinum (II) and palladium (II) chlorides on N,N-dimethylbenzylamines. J Am Chem Soc90:909–913. doi:10.1021/ja01006a012.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  63. 63.↵
    1. Lucca Neto VA,
    2. Mauro AE,
    3. Caires AC,
    4. Ananias SR,
    5. de Almeida ET
    . 1999. Synthesis, characterization, and thermal behavior of cyclopalladated compounds of the type [Pd{C6H4CH2N(CH3)2}(μ-X)]2 (X=Cl, NCO, SCN, CN). Polyhedron18:413–417. doi:10.1016/S0277-5387(98)00310-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  64. 64.↵
    1. Silva LH,
    2. Nussenzweig V
    . 1953. Sobre uma cepa de Trypanosoma cruzi altamente virulenta para o camundongo branco. Folia Clin Biol20:191–208.
    OpenUrl
  65. 65.↵
    1. Wass JA
    . 2004. Origin 7.0. Biotech Software Internet Rep3:130–133. doi:10.1089/152791602321105799.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  66. 66.↵
    1. Passalacqua TG,
    2. Dutra LA,
    3. De Almeida L,
    4. Velásquez AM,
    5. Torres Esteves FA,
    6. Yamasaki PR,
    7. Dos Santos Bastos M,
    8. Regasini LO,
    9. Michels PA,
    10. Da Silva Bolzani V,
    11. Graminha MA
    . 2015. Synthesis and evaluation of novel prenylated chalcone derivatives as anti-leishmanial and anti-trypanosomal compounds. Bioorganic Med Chem Lett25:3342–3345. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.05.072.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  67. 67.↵
    1. Dutra LA,
    2. De Almeida L,
    3. Passalacqua TG,
    4. Reis JS,
    5. Torres FA,
    6. Martinez I,
    7. Peccinini RG,
    8. Chin CM,
    9. Chegaev K,
    10. Guglielmo S,
    11. Fruttero R,
    12. Graminha MA,
    13. Dos Santos JL
    . 2014. Leishmanicidal activities of novel synthetic furoxan and benzofuroxan derivatives. Antimicrob Agents Chemother58:4837–4847. doi:10.1128/AAC.00052-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. 68.↵
    1. Contreras VT,
    2. Morel CM,
    3. Goldenberg S
    . 1985. Stage specific gene expression precedes morphological changes during Trypanosoma cruzi metacyclogenesis. Mol Biochem Parasitol14:83–96. doi:10.1016/0166-6851(85)90108-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  69. 69.↵
    1. Moore GE,
    2. Woods LK
    . 1976. Culture media for human cells: RPMI 1603, RPMI 1634, RPMI 1640, and GEM 1717. Tissue Cult Methods3:503–508. doi:10.1007/BF00918753.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  70. 70.↵
    1. Stauber LA
    . 1958. Strain of Leishmania donovani Host resistance to genus Leishmania. Rice Inst Pam45:80–96.
    OpenUrl
  71. 71.↵
    1. Seifert K,
    2. Juhls C,
    3. Salguero FJ,
    4. Croft SL
    . 2015. Sequential chemoimmunotherapy of experimental visceral leishmaniasis using a single low dose of liposomal amphotericin B and a novel DNA vaccine candidate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother59:5819–5823. doi:10.1128/AAC.00273-15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. 72.↵
    1. Murray HW,
    2. Brooks EB,
    3. DeVecchio JL,
    4. Heinzel FP
    . 2003. Immunoenhancement combined with amphotericin B as treatment for experimental visceral leishmaniasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother47:2513. doi:10.1128/AAC.47.8.2513-2517.2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. 73.↵
    1. Mullen AB,
    2. Baillie AJ,
    3. Carter KC
    . 1998. Visceral leishmaniasis in the BALB/c mouse: a comparison of the efficacy of a nonionic surfactant formulation of sodium stibogluconate with those of three proprietary formulations of amphotericin B. Antimicrob Agents Chemother42:2722–2725. http://aac.asm.org/content/42/10/2722.long.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  74. 74.↵
    1. Bergmeyer HU,
    2. Bowers GN,
    3. Horder M,
    4. Moss DW
    . 1977. Provisional recommendation on IFCC methods for the measurement of catalytic concentration of enzymes. 2. IFCC method for aspartate aminotransferase. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem15:39–51.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  75. 75.↵
    1. Wróblewski F,
    2. Ladue JS
    . 1956. Serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase in cardiac and hepatic disease. PSEBM91:569–571.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. 76.↵
    Committee on Enzymes of the Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Physiology. 1974. Recommended methods for the determination of four enzymes in blood. Scand J Clin Lab Invest33:291–306. doi:10.3109/00365517409082499.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  77. 77.↵
    1. Perry BW,
    2. Doumas BT,
    3. Bayse DD,
    4. Butler T,
    5. Cohen A,
    6. Fellows W,
    7. Garber CC,
    8. Howell B,
    9. Koch T,
    10. Krishnamurthy S,
    11. Louderback A,
    12. McComb RB,
    13. Miller D,
    14. Miller RR,
    15. Rand RN,
    16. Schaffer R
    . 1983. A candidate reference method for determination of bilirubin in serum: test for transferability. Clin Chem29:297–301. http://www.clinchem.org/content/29/2/297.long.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  78. 78.↵
    1. Doumas BT,
    2. Poon Pat Kwok-Cheung Perry BW
    . 1985. Candidate reference method for determination of total bilirubin in serum: development and validation. Clin Chem31:1779–1789. http://www.clinchem.org/content/31/11/1779.long.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  79. 79.↵
    1. Cook JGH
    . 1971. Creatinine assay in the presence of protein. Clin Chim Acta32:485–486. doi:10.1016/0009-8981(71)90452-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. 80.↵
    1. Bernt E,
    2. Bergmeyer HU
    . 1965. Urea, p 401–406. InBergmeyer HU (ed), Methods of enzymatic analysis, 2nd ed. Academic Press, New York, NY.
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Efficacy of a Binuclear Cyclopalladated Compound Therapy for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in the Murine Model of Infection with Leishmania amazonensis and Its Inhibitory Effect on Topoisomerase 1B
Angela Maria Arenas Velásquez, Willian Campos Ribeiro, Vutey Venn, Silvia Castelli, Mariana Santoro de Camargo, Renata Pires de Assis, Rodrigo Alves de Souza, Aline Rimoldi Ribeiro, Thaís Gaban Passalacqua, João Aristeu da Rosa, Amanda Martins Baviera, Antonio Eduardo Mauro, Alessandro Desideri, Elmo Eduardo Almeida-Amaral, Marcia A. S. Graminha
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jul 2017, 61 (8) e00688-17; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00688-17

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Efficacy of a Binuclear Cyclopalladated Compound Therapy for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in the Murine Model of Infection with Leishmania amazonensis and Its Inhibitory Effect on Topoisomerase 1B
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Efficacy of a Binuclear Cyclopalladated Compound Therapy for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in the Murine Model of Infection with Leishmania amazonensis and Its Inhibitory Effect on Topoisomerase 1B
Angela Maria Arenas Velásquez, Willian Campos Ribeiro, Vutey Venn, Silvia Castelli, Mariana Santoro de Camargo, Renata Pires de Assis, Rodrigo Alves de Souza, Aline Rimoldi Ribeiro, Thaís Gaban Passalacqua, João Aristeu da Rosa, Amanda Martins Baviera, Antonio Eduardo Mauro, Alessandro Desideri, Elmo Eduardo Almeida-Amaral, Marcia A. S. Graminha
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jul 2017, 61 (8) e00688-17; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00688-17
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Antiprotozoal Agents
Benzylamines
Leishmania mexicana
Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous
Palladium
Topoisomerase I Inhibitors
cyclopalladated complex
leishmaniasis
Chagas disease
Leishmania amazonensis
Trypanosoma cruzi
Leishmania donovani
topoisomerase 1B

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596