Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mechanisms of Resistance

In Vivo Emergence of Resistance to Novel Cephalosporin–β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations through the Duplication of Amino Acid D149 from OXA-2 β-Lactamase (OXA-539) in Sequence Type 235 Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Pablo A. Fraile-Ribot, Xavier Mulet, Gabriel Cabot, Ester del Barrio-Tofiño, Carlos Juan, José L. Pérez, Antonio Oliver
Pablo A. Fraile-Ribot
Servicio de Microbiología and Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Illes Balears (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xavier Mulet
Servicio de Microbiología and Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Illes Balears (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gabriel Cabot
Servicio de Microbiología and Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Illes Balears (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gabriel Cabot
Ester del Barrio-Tofiño
Servicio de Microbiología and Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Illes Balears (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlos Juan
Servicio de Microbiología and Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Illes Balears (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
José L. Pérez
Servicio de Microbiología and Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Illes Balears (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antonio Oliver
Servicio de Microbiología and Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Illes Balears (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Antonio Oliver
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01117-17
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Resistance development to novel cephalosporin–β-lactamase inhibitor combinations during ceftazidime treatment of a surgical infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa was investigated. Both initial (97C2) and final (98G1) isolates belonged to the high-risk clone sequence type (ST) 235 and were resistant to carbapenems (oprD), fluoroquinolones (GyrA-T83I, ParC-S87L), and aminoglycosides (aacA7/aacA8/aadA6). 98G1 also showed resistance to ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, and ceftolozane-tazobactam. Sequencing identified blaOXA-2 in 97C2, but 98G1 contained a 3-bp insertion leading to the duplication of the key residue D149 (designated OXA-539). Evaluation of PAO1 transformants producing cloned OXA-2 or OXA-539 confirmed that D149 duplication was the cause of resistance. Active surveillance of the emergence of resistance to these new valuable agents is warranted.

TEXT

The increasing prevalence of nosocomial infections produced by multidrug-resistant (MDR) or extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains severely compromises the selection of appropriate treatments and is therefore associated with significant morbidity and mortality (1–3). This growing threat results from the extraordinary capacity of this pathogen to develop resistance to nearly all available antibiotics by the selection of mutations in chromosomal genes and from the increasing prevalence of transferable resistance determinants, particularly those encoding class B carbapenemases (metallo-β-lactamases [MBLs]) or extended-spectrum β-lactamases, frequently cotransferred with genes encoding aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (4, 5). The emergence of MDR/XDR global clones, deemed high-risk clones, disseminated in several hospitals worldwide adds further concern (6, 7).

The recent introduction of novel β-lactam–β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, namely, ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam, which are stable against most mutational resistance mechanisms, including the overexpression of the chromosomal cephalosporinase AmpC, partially alleviates the urgent clinical need for new agents that combat infections by MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa (8–10). Thus, the potential emergence of resistance to these antibiotics is of particular concern. Therefore, we report here the characterization of the resistance mechanisms of a P. aeruginosa clinical isolate recovered from a surgical wound in a patient with colon cancer that was documented to develop resistance to ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, and ceftolozane-tazobactam during ceftazidime therapy.

Isolates 97C2 and 98G1, obtained with a 30-day interval from a surgical wound from a patient treated with ceftazidime, were found to belong to the same clone through pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) assays using SpeI as the restriction enzyme (11). Moreover, multilocus sequence typing (MLST), following stablished schemes (http://pubmlst.org/paeruginosa ), identified both isolates as sequence type (ST) 235 international high-risk clones (7).

Table 1 shows the comparative broth microdilution susceptibility profiles of the two isolates, according to CLSI guidelines and breakpoints (12). As shown, although both isolates were resistant to carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides, the second isolate also developed resistance to cefepime, ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, and ceftolozane-tazobactam. However, both isolates remained within the susceptibility breakpoints for piperacillin-tazobactam (16/4 μg/ml) and aztreonam (8 μg/ml).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of studied clinical isolates

To decipher the involved resistance mechanisms, the presence of horizontally acquired β-lactamases was investigated through previously established phenotypic and molecular (PCR) methods (11). Moreover, sequence variation on 146 chromosomal genes related to antimicrobial resistance was evaluated as previously described (13). Briefly, indexed paired-end libraries were generated from genomic DNA using a commercial library preparation kit (Nextera XT, Illumina, USA) and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq benchtop sequencer with a MiSeq reagent kit (version 2). Obtained paired-ended reads were aligned to the P. aeruginosa PAO1 reference genome, and sequence variation was further analyzed for the 146 chromosomal genes related to antimicrobial resistance (13). The presence of horizontally acquired resistance determinants was further explored using online databases (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk//services/ResFinder/ ).

Both isolates showed the same oprD inactivating mutation [insertion of 1 pb (C) in nucleotide 1205] responsible for the carbapenem-resistant phenotype and the GyrA T83I and ParC S87L mutations responsible for fluoroquinolone resistance. However, differential mutations between the strains for the 146 genes studied were not detected, including classic ceftazidime resistance mutations in AmpC regulators (e.g., ampD, dacB, or ampR) or MexAB-OprM efflux pump regulators (e.g., mexB, nalC, or nalD), suggesting that chromosomal mutations were not the cause of the developed resistance phenotype. Moreover, PCR assays for acquired β-lactamases yielded a single positive result for OXA-2-type β-lactamases in both isolates. However, sequencing of the amplicons showed that, although blaOXA-2 was identified in 97C2, isolate 98G1 harbored a previously undescribed 3-bp insertion leading to the duplication of the key residue D149 (https://www.lahey.org/studies/webt.asp#OXA ; D151 according to the full-length precursor OXA-2 protein). This novel OXA-2-derived enzyme was designated OXA-539 (GenBank accession no. KY094077 ). Remarkably, the substitution of this key aspartate D149 residue has been described to confer an extended-spectrum phenotype, such as that reported for OXA-15 (14) or OXA-36 (15), in which it is replaced by glycine and tyrosine, respectively.

Both OXA-2 and OXA-539 were documented to be located in an In78 class 1 integron (16), together with several aminoglycoside resistance determinants responsible for documented tobramycin and amikacin resistance (Fig. 1). Southern blot hybridization of the I-CeuI nuclease-digested genomes, following described protocols (17), suggested chromosomal location of OXA-2/OXA-539 genes, given that the OXA gene probes hybridized with bands that also hybridized with the rRNA gene probes (not shown). Moreover, all attempts to transfer OXA-2/OXA-539 through electroporation and conjugation consistently yielded negative results, supporting the chromosomal location of the β-lactamases (17).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Structure of the In78 integron harboring OXA-2/539.

To evaluate the impact of the D149 duplication on β-lactam resistance, blaOXA-2 and blaOXA-539 PCR products were cloned into pUCP24, transformed into Escherichia coli XL1-Blue, and finally electroporated into P. aeruginosa PAO1, following previously described protocols (18). Table 2 shows the β-lactam MICs of PAO1 derivatives harboring the cloning vector or the cloned OXA-2 or OXA-539 β-lactamases. As shown, OXA-539 notably increased cefepime, ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, and ceftolozane-tazobactam MICs compared with OXA-2. In contrast, meropenem MICs were less affected by the expression of OXA-539 than by that of OXA-2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

MICs for the PAO1 transformants producing OXA-2 or OXA-539 β-lactamases

To our knowledge, this is the first report documenting the in vivo emergence of an extended-spectrum OXA β-lactamase during treatment of human infection with broad-spectrum cephalosporins. Likewise, this is the first report in which an extended spectrum is generated from narrow-spectrum OXA β-lactamases through the duplication of a key amino acid. The fact that this resistance mechanism emerged in the ST235 high-risk clone, characterized by its worldwide dissemination, its extraordinary association with transferable resistance, and its higher virulence, associated with the production of the ExoU cytotoxin, adds further concern to our findings (7, 19–22). Moreover, according to a recent review, OXA-2-producing ST235 has been reported in at least 14 countries (7). However, of possible greater concern is the development of cross-resistance to ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam, because they are particularly useful for combating infections by MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa. The prevalence of primary resistance to these agents depends on the geographic location, but it is still globally low and mostly linked to the production of horizontally acquired MBLs (23–26). The main advantage of ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam over other antipseudomonal β-lactams is their stability against most mutation-driven resistance mechanisms, including the overexpression of the chromosomal cephalosporinase AmpC. In vitro studies revealed that the emergence of resistance occurs at lower frequency than with other agents, and it is linked to specific mutations leading to the structural modification of AmpC- or efflux-related mechanisms in the case of ceftazidime-avibactam (9, 27–30). In this work, we describe one further mechanism for development of resistance to these new antibiotics, through the selection of extended-spectrum mutations from narrow-spectrum OXA β-lactamases, such as OXA-2, which is relatively frequent among P. aeruginosa isolates worldwide (31). Altogether, these findings argue for the need to maintain an active surveillance of the mechanisms involved in the emergence of resistance to these new valuable agents.

Accession number(s).The novel OXA-2-derived enzyme OXA-539 was deposited in GenBank under the accession no. KY094077 .

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of Spain, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, cofinanced by European Regional Development Fund “A way to achieve Europe” ERDF, through the Spanish Network for the Research in Infectious Diseases (RD12/0015/0006 and RD15/0016/0004) and grant PI15/00088.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 29 May 2017.
    • Returned for modification 27 June 2017.
    • Accepted 29 June 2017.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 3 July 2017.
  • Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved .

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Livermore DM
    . 2009. Has the era of untreatable infections arrived?J Antimicrob Chemother64(Suppl 1):i29–i36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Mesaros N,
    2. Nordmann P,
    3. Plésiat P,
    4. Roussel-Delvallez M,
    5. Van Eldere J,
    6. Glupczynski Y,
    7. Van Laethem Y,
    8. Jacobs F,
    9. Lebecque P,
    10. Malfroot A,
    11. Tulkens PM,
    12. Van Bambeke F
    . 2007. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: resistance and therapeutic options at the turn of the new millennium. Clin Microbiol Infect13:560–578. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01681.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Peña C,
    2. Suarez C,
    3. Gozalo M,
    4. Murillas J,
    5. Almirante B,
    6. Pomar V,
    7. Aguilar M,
    8. Granados A,
    9. Calbo E,
    10. Rodríguez-Baño J,
    11. Rodríguez F,
    12. Tubau F,
    13. Martínez-Martínez L,
    14. Oliver A
    ,Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI). 2012. Prospective multicenter study of the impact of carbapenem resistance on mortality in Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother56:1265–1272. doi:10.1128/AAC.05991-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lister PD,
    2. Wolter DJ,
    3. Hanson ND
    . 2009. Antibacterial-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: clinical impact and complex regulation of chromosomally encoded resistance mechanisms. Clin Microbiol Rev22:582–610. doi:10.1128/CMR.00040-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Poole K
    . 2011. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: resistance to the max. Front Microbiol2:65. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2011.00065.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Woodford N,
    2. Turton JF,
    3. Livermore DM
    . 2011. Multiresistant Gram-negative bacteria: the role of high-risk clones in the dissemination of antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev35:736–755. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00268.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Oliver A,
    2. Mulet X,
    3. López-Causapé C,
    4. Juan C
    . 2015. The increasing threat of Pseudomonas aeruginosa high-risk clones. Drug Resist Updat21–22:41–59. doi:10.1016/j.drup.2015.08.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Moya B,
    2. Zamorano L,
    3. Juan C,
    4. Pérez JL,
    5. Ge Y,
    6. Oliver A
    . 2010. Activity of a new cephalosporin, CXA-101 (FR264205), against beta-lactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants selected in vitro and after antipseudomonal treatment of intensive care unit patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother54:1213–1217. doi:10.1128/AAC.01104-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Torrens G,
    2. Cabot G,
    3. Ocampo-Sosa AA,
    4. Conejo MC,
    5. Zamorano L,
    6. Navarro F,
    7. Pascual Á Martínez-Martínez L,
    8. Oliver A
    . 2016. Activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against clinical and isogenic laboratory Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates expressing combinations of most relevant β-lactam resistance mechanisms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother60:6407–6410. doi:10.1128/AAC.01282-16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. van Duin D,
    2. Bonomo RA
    . 2016. Ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam: second-generation β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Clin Infect Dis63:234–241. doi:10.1093/cid/ciw243.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Cabot G,
    2. Ocampo-Sosa AA,
    3. Domínguez MA,
    4. Gago JF,
    5. Juan C,
    6. Tubau F,
    7. Rodríguez C,
    8. Moyà B,
    9. Peña C,
    10. Martínez-Martínez L,
    11. Oliver A
    ,Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI). 2012. Genetic markers of widespread extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa high-risk clones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother56:6349–6357. doi:10.1128/AAC.01388-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2017. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing—27th ed. CLSI document M100. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Wayne, PA.
  13. 13.↵
    1. Cabot G,
    2. López-Causapé C,
    3. Ocampo-Sosa AA,
    4. Sommer LM,
    5. Domínguez MÁ Zamorano L,
    6. Juan C,
    7. Tubau F,
    8. Rodríguez C,
    9. Moyà B,
    10. Peña C,
    11. Martínez-Martínez L,
    12. Plesiat P,
    13. Oliver A
    . 2016. Deciphering the resistome of the widespread Pseudomonas aeruginosa sequence type 175 international high-risk clone through whole-genome sequencing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother60:7415–7423.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Danel F,
    2. Hall LM,
    3. Gur D,
    4. Livermore DM
    . 1997. OXA-15, an extended-spectrum variant of OXA-2 beta-lactamase, isolated from a Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother41:785–790.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Poirel L,
    2. Naas T,
    3. Nordmann P
    . 2010. Diversity, epidemiology, and genetics of class D beta-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother54:24–38. doi:10.1128/AAC.01512-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Aubert D,
    2. Girlich D,
    3. Naas T,
    4. Nagarajan S,
    5. Nordmann P
    . 2004. Functional and structural characterization of the genetic environment of an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase blaVEB gene from a Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate obtained in India. Antimicrob Agents Chemother48:3284–3290. doi:10.1128/AAC.48.9.3284-3290.2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Viedma E,
    2. Estepa V,
    3. Juan C,
    4. Castillo-Vera J,
    5. Rojo-Bezares B,
    6. Seral C,
    7. Castillo FJ,
    8. Sáenz Y,
    9. Torres C,
    10. Chaves F,
    11. Oliver A
    . 2014. Comparison of local features from two Spanish hospitals reveals common and specific traits at multiple levels of the molecular epidemiology of metallo-β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother58:2454–2458. doi:10.1128/AAC.02586-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Juan C,
    2. Mulet X,
    3. Zamorano L,
    4. Albertí S,
    5. Pérez JL,
    6. Oliver A
    . 2009. Detection of the novel extended-spectrum beta-lactamase OXA-161 from a plasmid-located integron in Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from Spain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother53:5288–5290. doi:10.1128/AAC.00822-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Juan C,
    2. Peña C,
    3. Oliver A
    . 2017. Host and pathogen biomarkers for severe Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. J Infect Dis215(Suppl 1):S44–S51. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiw299.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    1. Maatallah M,
    2. Cheriaa J,
    3. Backhrouf A,
    4. Iversen A,
    5. Grundmann H,
    6. Do T,
    7. Lanotte P,
    8. Mastouri M,
    9. Elghmati MS,
    10. Rojo F,
    11. Mejdi S,
    12. Giske CG
    . 2011. Population structure of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from five Mediterranean countries: evidence for frequent recombination and epidemic occurrence of CC235. PLoS One6:e25617. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025617.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Edelstein MV,
    2. Skleenova EN,
    3. Shevchenko OV,
    4. D'Souza JW,
    5. Tapalski DV,
    6. Azizov IS,
    7. Sukhorukova MV,
    8. Pavlukov RA,
    9. Kozlov RS,
    10. Toleman MA,
    11. Walsh TR
    . 2013. Spread of extensively resistant VIM-2-positive ST235 Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Russia: a longitudinal epidemiological and clinical study. Lancet Infect Dis13:867–876. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70168-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Treepong P,
    2. Kos VN,
    3. Guyeux C,
    4. Blanc DS,
    5. Bertrand X,
    6. Valot B,
    7. Hocquet D
    . 2017. Global emergence of the widespread Pseudomonas aeruginosa ST235 clone. Clin Microbiol Infect Jun22:pii=S1198-743X(17)30342-7. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2017.06.018.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    1. Juan C,
    2. Zamorano L,
    3. Pérez JL,
    4. Ge Y,
    5. Oliver A. Spanish Group for the Study of Pseudomonas
    ,Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases. 2010. Activity of a new antipseudomonal cephalosporin, CXA-101 (FR264205), against carbapenem-resistant and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother54:846–851. doi:10.1128/AAC.00834-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Pfaller MA,
    2. Bassetti M,
    3. Duncan LR,
    4. Castanheira M
    . 2017. Ceftolozane/tazobactam activity against drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing urinary tract and intraabdominal infections in Europe: report from an antimicrobial surveillance programme (2012–15). J Antimicrob Chemother72:1386–1395. doi:10.1093/jac/dkx009.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    1. Shortridge D,
    2. Castanheira M,
    3. Pfaller MA,
    4. Flamm RK
    . 2017. Ceftolozane-tazobactam activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from US hospitals: report from the PACTS antimicrobial surveillance program, 2012 to 2015. Antimicrob Agents Chemother61:pii=e00465-17. doi:10.1128/AAC.00465-17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Nichols WW,
    2. de Jonge BL,
    3. Kazmierczak KM,
    4. Karlowsky JA,
    5. Sahm DF
    . 2016. In vitro susceptibility of global surveillance isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ceftazidime-avibactam (INFORM 2012 to 2014). Antimicrob Agents Chemother60:4743–4749. doi:10.1128/AAC.00220-16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Cabot G,
    2. Bruchmann S,
    3. Mulet X,
    4. Zamorano L,
    5. Moyà B,
    6. Juan C,
    7. Haussler S,
    8. Oliver A
    . 2014. Pseudomonas aeruginosa ceftolozane-tazobactam resistance development requires multiple mutations leading to overexpression and structural modification of AmpC. Antimicrob Agents Chemother58:3091–3099. doi:10.1128/AAC.02462-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Berrazeg M,
    2. Jeannot K,
    3. Ntsogo Enguéné VY,
    4. Broutin I,
    5. Loeffert S,
    6. Fournier D,
    7. Plésiat P
    . 2015. Mutations in β-lactamase AmpC increase resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates to antipseudomonal cephalosporins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother59:6248–6255. doi:10.1128/AAC.00825-15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Lahiri SD,
    2. Walkup GK,
    3. Whiteaker JD,
    4. Palmer T,
    5. McCormack K,
    6. Tanudra MA,
    7. Nash TJ,
    8. Thresher J,
    9. Johnstone MR,
    10. Hajec L,
    11. Livchak S,
    12. McLaughlin RE,
    13. Alm RA
    . 2015. Selection and molecular characterization of ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant mutants in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains containing derepressed AmpC. J Antimicrob Chemother70:1650–1658. doi:10.1093/jac/dkv004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Winkler ML,
    2. Papp-Wallace KM,
    3. Hujer AM,
    4. Domitrovic TN,
    5. Hujer KM,
    6. Hurless KN,
    7. Tuohy M,
    8. Hall G,
    9. Bonomo RA
    . 2015. Unexpected challenges in treating multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam in archived isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother59:1020–1029. doi:10.1128/AAC.04238-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Evans BA,
    2. Amyes SG
    . 2014. OXA β-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev27:241–263. doi:10.1128/CMR.00117-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
In Vivo Emergence of Resistance to Novel Cephalosporin–β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations through the Duplication of Amino Acid D149 from OXA-2 β-Lactamase (OXA-539) in Sequence Type 235 Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Pablo A. Fraile-Ribot, Xavier Mulet, Gabriel Cabot, Ester del Barrio-Tofiño, Carlos Juan, José L. Pérez, Antonio Oliver
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Aug 2017, 61 (9) e01117-17; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01117-17

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Vivo Emergence of Resistance to Novel Cephalosporin–β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations through the Duplication of Amino Acid D149 from OXA-2 β-Lactamase (OXA-539) in Sequence Type 235 Pseudomonas aeruginosa
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
In Vivo Emergence of Resistance to Novel Cephalosporin–β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations through the Duplication of Amino Acid D149 from OXA-2 β-Lactamase (OXA-539) in Sequence Type 235 Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Pablo A. Fraile-Ribot, Xavier Mulet, Gabriel Cabot, Ester del Barrio-Tofiño, Carlos Juan, José L. Pérez, Antonio Oliver
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Aug 2017, 61 (9) e01117-17; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01117-17
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • TEXT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Amino Acid Sequence
Azabicyclo Compounds
ceftazidime
cephalosporins
Penicillanic Acid
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
beta-lactamase inhibitors
beta-lactamases
extended-spectrum OXA
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
multidrug resistance
ceftolozane-tazobactam
ceftazidime-avibactam

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596