Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Clinical Therapeutics

A Prospective Real-World Study of the Impact of an Antifungal Stewardship Program in a Tertiary Respiratory-Medicine Setting

Lisa Nwankwo, Jimstan Periselneris, Jamie Cheong, Keith Thompson, Peter Darby, Neil Leaver, Silke Schelenz, Darius Armstrong-James
Lisa Nwankwo
aDepartment of Pharmacy, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jimstan Periselneris
bDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jamie Cheong
aDepartment of Pharmacy, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keith Thompson
aDepartment of Pharmacy, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Darby
cDepartment of Microbiology, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neil Leaver
dImmunosuppression Monitoring Service, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Silke Schelenz
cDepartment of Microbiology, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Darius Armstrong-James
eFaculty of Medicine, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00402-18
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

There has been an increase in fungal infections in patients with chronic lung disease over the past decades, which is associated with rapidly increasing costs to health care systems. An antifungal stewardship team was introduced to a tertiary cardiopulmonary hospital, consisting of a medical mycologist and pharmacy support providing weekly stewardship ward rounds, twice-monthly multidisciplinary team meetings, and a dedicated weekly outpatient clinic. A database was set up to record the activity of the stewardship team. During the first 18 months of implementation, the antifungal stewardship team had reviewed 178 patients, with 285 recommendations made to inpatients, and 287 outpatient visits. The commonest diagnoses treated were allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis and chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Cystic fibrosis was the largest patient group treated, followed by asthma and interstitial lung disease. There was a significant sustained reduction in monthly antifungal expenditure (P = 0.005) by £130,000 per month. There was also a significant reduction in antifungal use, measured as the defined daily dose/100 bed days (P = 0.017). There were no significant changes in expenditure on diagnostic tests. There has been a trend toward more patients having therapeutic levels of voriconazole (P = 0.086) and a significant increase in therapeutic levels of posaconazole (P < 0.0001). This study shows that an effective antifungal stewardship program can significantly reduce expenditure in a specialist respiratory service.

INTRODUCTION

Antimicrobial resistance has emerged as a major threat to modern health care systems (1). Within this context, the major focus has been on antibacterial resistance, which has had a major adverse impact on respiratory health both within the context of chronic respiratory disease as well as acute respiratory infection (2).

There has been an incompletely understood emergence of chronic fungal infection across multiple chronic respiratory diseases, in particular due to Aspergillus fumigatus. This may be in part due to increased awareness and recognition, as well as the introduction of prolonged fungus-specific culture and serological tests to aid in diagnosis. Additionally, patients with chronic respiratory disease are surviving longer with impaired local immunity in the lung, allowing for more fungal respiratory infections to occur. In contrast to invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, chronic pulmonary forms of aspergillosis are poorly defined (though systematic approaches have begun to take shape [3, 4]) and suffer from a relative lack of well-designed randomized controlled trials to guide treatment. Risk factors include bronchiectasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cystic fibrosis (CF), transplantation, prolonged steroid use, and other immunosuppressive agents, such as chemotherapy (5, 6). Aspergillus infections have increased in incidence over the past 40 years (7), with recent estimates suggesting there may be 240,000 patients with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) (3) and over 1,000,000 patients with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) in Europe (8). A number of recent studies have highlighted the emerging threat of triazole multidrug resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus (9). We and others observe emergent triazole resistance dependent both on agricultural exposure to triazoles (10) and de novo emergence of resistance in individuals receiving chronic triazole therapy, which is currently the only orally available mold-active antifungal drug class. There are data that increasing rates of triazole resistance have been noted in patients with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (11), which may develop during treatment and may be associated with subtherapeutic drug levels (12). Achieving therapeutic triazole levels using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is associated with treatment success against invasive fungal disease (13–15), though there are no published data on chronic respiratory disease.

In the United States, national data suggest that 4.9% of the antimicrobial expenditure in 2015 was due to antifungals (approximately $2.4 billion), an 18.8% increase compared to 2014 (16). The principles of antifungal stewardship are to optimize antifungal prescription by assessing the spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics, and duration and route of administration (17). This is particularly important in the context of antifungal toxicities and costs. There are relatively few data on the effect of antifungal stewardship programs, and largely, these refer to invasive fungal disease in the context of hematological disorders and on intensive care units. A UK stewardship program demonstrated crude savings of £180,000 on antifungal expenditure in a year (18), whereas Spanish studies have reported reductions in antifungal expenditure by 11.8% ($370,681) (19) and 13.9% ($529,163) (20). To our knowledge, there has not been an assessment of the effect of antifungal stewardship in chronic respiratory disease patients.

Taken together, these observations are indicative of an urgent clinical need to limit inappropriate triazole antifungal usage through judicious antifungal stewardship. We report on the delivery and impact of an antifungal stewardship program targeting the use of antifungals within the respiratory directorate at our center.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-eight patients were reviewed over an 18-month period. The largest patient group was cystic fibrosis (69 patients), followed by asthma (32 patients), sarcoidosis (25 patients), other interstitial lung diseases (15 patients), bronchiectasis (15 patients), other primary immune deficiency (8 patients), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (5 patients), and the remainder with other underlying diseases. Diagnoses after review by the stewardship team included allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (63 patients), chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (31 patients), mycetoma (20 patients), Aspergillus bronchitis (13 patients), infections with other mold species (13 patients), Aspergillus colonization (10 patients), pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (5 patients), and 6 other diagnoses. Sixteen patients had no confirmed fungal infection.

Of the CF population, 51% were male, and the mean age was 27.9 years (standard deviation [SD], 7.6). In the non-CF population, 62% patients were female, and the mean age was 56.7 years (SD, 12.8).

Apart from Aspergillus species, other molds that were thought to be contributing to respiratory disease included Scedosporium apiospermum, Scedosporium prolificans, Exophiala dermatitidis, and Rasamsonia argillacea, all in CF patients. Current rates of resistance among screened isolates of A. fumigatus at the Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust (RBHT) are 13.1%, though there are insufficient data to see if this changed after the initiation of the stewardship program.

Two hundred eighty-five antifungal stewardship recommendations were made to inpatients by the stewardship team. The recommendations included arranging a review in a specific outpatient clinic or at the fungal multidisciplinary team (MDT), advice on specific investigations to confirm/refute diagnosis, stepping down treatment to oral antifungals, ensuring appropriate dosing to attain therapeutic levels and avoid toxicity, stopping treatment in patients without confirmed fungal disease or who were likely to have colonization only, and, on occasion, escalating or adding antifungals in treatment to address failure to achieve therapeutic goals. Additionally, 287 outpatient appointments were made over the study period, allowing the medical mycologist to direct antifungal management in these patients. Overall expenditure on antifungals was reduced from £290,000 per month to £160,000 per month (Fig. 1A), a 44.8% reduction, and an amount equivalent to over a million pounds a year has been saved in terms of antifungal expenditure. There was a significant effect when analyzed by interrupted time sequence analysis (ITSA) (P = 0.005). This was largely driven by a reduced use of intravenous voriconazole and caspofungin. This was also reflected in a reduction in defined daily dose (DDD)/100 bed days of all antifungal medication (ITSA, P = 0.017) (Fig. 1B), which indicates a reduction in antifungal use while stripping out variations in individual medication cost. There was a similar effect on both intravenous and oral antifungal use (Fig. 1C).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Expenditure on antifungal drugs. (A) Expenditure on systemic antifungals against time, shown as segmental linear regression and ITSA (P = 0.005). (B) Defined daily dose of antifungals per 100 bed days by quarter, shown as segmental regression and ITSA (P = 0.017). (C) Defined daily dose of oral and intravenous (IV) antifungals per 100 bed days, shown as segmental regression.

During the study period, 6 patients died. Five patients died of progressive respiratory failure related to their underlying respiratory condition (bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, interstitial lung disease, or relapsing polychondritis) not directly related to their fungal disease, and one patient died of liver failure secondary to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. None of the deaths could be directly attributed to the fungal lung disease or antifungal medications.

Individual drug costs varied throughout the study period dependent on Trust-pharmaceutical company negotiations. In addition, voriconazole came off patent in July 2016, potentially contributing to the reduction in drug costs, though no obvious effect can be seen on expenditure data.

Despite this, while expenditure on diagnostics has shown a gradual increase over several years, this was not directly associated with the commencement of the stewardship program. Expenditure on TDM has not changed significantly (ITSA, P = 0.28) (Fig. 2), and that for serological testing for Aspergillus IgG and Aspergillus IgE has decreased, but not significantly (P = 0.074 for Aspergillus IgG and P = 0.381 for Aspergillus IgE) (Fig. 3A and B). Although numbers are small, there has been an increase in galactomannan and β-d-glucan expenditure since the stewardship program started (Fig. 3C), though probably due to the relatively low usage; this was not statistically significant (galactomannan, P = 0.38; β-d-glucan, P = 0.32). TDM analysis has shown a significant increase in posaconazole levels into the therapeutic range over time (P < 0.0001) and a nonsignificant increase in voriconazole levels (P = 0.086) but no effect on itraconazole levels (Fig. 4), as measured by linear regression analysis. Our data set's current length of follow up is inadequate to formally assess therapeutic clinical responses, such as radiological changes, lung function, exacerbation rate, and quality of life measurements.

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Expenditure on therapeutic drug monitoring. Expenditure on therapeutic drug monitoring shown as segmental linear regression and ITSA (P = 0.28).

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Expenditure on fungal serological and biochemical markers. (A) Expenditure on Aspergillus IgE against time, with segmental linear regression and ITSA (P = 0.381). (B) Expenditure on Aspergillus IgG against time, with segmental linear regression and ITSA (P = 0.074). (C) Expenditure on galactomannan (P = 0.38) and β-d-glucan (P = 0.32), shown as segmental linear regression and ITSA.

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Therapeutic drug levels over time. (A) Correlation between date and itraconazole level (dotted lines mark the therapeutic range; R = 0.0006, P = 0.535) (B) Correlation between date and voriconazole level (R = 0.013, P = 0.086). (C) Correlation between date and posaconazole level (R = 0.057, P < 0.0001).

Overall spending in fungal microbiology has increased over this time period. However, this largely stems from the introduction of extended 4-week fungal culture of sputum for CF patients in October 2014. Once the period prior to this was excluded, microbiology fungal diagnostic expenditure remained static (ITSA, P = 0.85) (Fig. 5). Aspergillus PCR was trialed during this time but was not found to be clinically useful.

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Microbiology fungal diagnostics expenditure. (A) Fungal diagnostic expenditure against time. (B) Fungal diagnostic expenditure after prolonged culture for CF samples was introduced with segmental linear regression and ITSA (P = 0.85).

DISCUSSION

The use of antifungals in chronic respiratory disease has increased markedly over past decades (21). With patients surviving longer, and in particular with prolonged immunosuppression (e.g., oral steroids), the burden of fungal disease has increased. This has been particularly evident at the RBHT, given that it is a provider of specialist cardiorespiratory care. Data on treatment are sparse, with only a few randomized controlled trials (22–24) and observational data (25, 26) guiding treatment and informing guidelines (3, 4, 27).

The introduction of an antifungal stewardship team, outpatient review clinic, and detailed discussion of patients by multidisciplinary assessment has been effective in reducing antifungal expenditure without an increase in morbidity or mortality. This is likely due to closer adherence to international guidelines, which have been incorporated into local trust microbiology guidelines. Common contributions to care given by the stewardship team include the use of therapeutic drug monitoring to optimize antifungal dosage prior to avoid switching agents and rationalizing dual-antifungal treatment approaches. The reduction in expenditure has largely derived from the reduction of intravenous treatment, which would have the additional benefit of reducing inpatient stays and attendant costs. Improved therapeutic drug monitoring may also have enabled a lesser requirement for second-line therapies. Interestingly, there has been an increase in the number of patients with therapeutic levels of antifungals despite no increase in diagnostic costs. This may suggest that prior to the setup of the stewardship team, these tests were requested but little heed taken to the results, likely due to the lack of confidence of clinicians in the use of antifungals. This was not seen with itraconazole, the drug most used by nonexperts within the Trust, perhaps supporting this speculation. The Trust has derived significant savings while continuing to provide excellent care.

There are data that suggest that increased serum concentrations of voriconazole (14, 28) and posaconazole (15) in a therapeutic range have been associated with better outcome, but there are observational studies with few patients in invasive fungal disease. In general, few patients achieve sufficient levels of antifungal drugs in serum (29). There have not been previous data examining the use of TDM for chronic fungal diseases. The lack of longitudinal data means that our data set is underpowered to inform or comment on clinical responses to azoles. Indeed, tissue levels of antifungals may be more relevant than serum levels in chronic pulmonary fungal disease; currently, there is no recognized mechanism of determining pulmonary tissue drug penetration.

The use of antifungals in patients with chronic respiratory disease has been increasing over the past few years. This is likely to be a result of better recognition of fungal disease and patients with conditions, such as COPD and sarcoidosis, surviving longer. There is also a suspicion that fungal infection may drive some respiratory pathology, e.g., ABPA and pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis. There is a clear need for further research into how these molds contribute to pathogenesis and into the development of less toxic antifungal agents.

As such, the future increase in the use of antifungals in patients with chronic respiratory disease seems likely, and we have shown that antifungal stewardship is effective and safe. We would advocate that this model could be disseminated to other centers where antifungal expenditure is climbing to good effect.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust is a tertiary center caring for patients with cardiac and respiratory disease. Within the respiratory directorate, care is provided for large patient cohorts across the south of England for chronic respiratory conditions, such as CF, difficult asthma, and interstitial lung diseases. Many patients are referred when their secondary-care physicians have difficulty managing them, so there is a high proportion of patients with advanced and intractable diseases. There is no emergency department, so the majority of inpatients have been admitted electively, often for intravenous treatment or monitoring.

In January 2015, a consultant infectious diseases (ID) physician who is also a medical mycologist and a new microbiology lead were appointed, partly to address the use of antifungals within the Trust. An antifungal stewardship team composed of the ID physician and a specialist pharmacist was set up, with a goal to review inpatients on antifungals on a weekly basis. A weekly outpatient clinic was organized to review those with chronic fungal lung disease, resulting in the care of these patients being taken over by the medical mycologist. Monthly multidisciplinary team meetings were also arranged as a forum for outpatients to be discussed, involving the physicians primarily caring for the patient, radiologists, and stewardship team. This allowed the diagnosis to be reviewed, appropriate investigations to be carried out, and specific advice regarding antifungal prescriptions to be discussed.

The patients were identified by the pharmacy team using dispensing records and electronic prescribing systems, and all patients reviewed were entered onto a Microsoft Access database. There was also extensive rewriting of the antimicrobial guideline, including a large section on antifungal use.

Data for the first 18 months of fungal stewardship implementation were recorded. This included patient demographics, underlying diagnoses, fungal diagnosis, therapeutic drug levels, microbiology, serology, radiology, and advice given. Calcofluor white fluorescence was used in sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples. Laboratory culture was used to identify molds by morphology, and in-house susceptibility testing was performed, with samples also being sent to the Public Health England Mycology Reference Laboratory in Bristol, UK. Aspergillus IgE and IgG were performed in-house in the biochemistry laboratory. Serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid levels of galactomannan were performed weekly in-house in the microbiology laboratory, with β-d-glucan levels sent to Public Health England Mycology Reference Laboratory. TDM was also performed in-house for itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry.

The results were analyzed on GraphPad Prism 7, and the effect of intervention was analyzed using ITSA calculated by Newey-West regression, a semiquantitative statistical test, on Stata/MP 12.0. This study was registered with the Quality & Safety Department of the RBHT.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Tushar Ramsurran for help in gathering data contributing to this paper.

The stewardship program has been supported by donations from Gilead, and Astellas provided funding that supported J.P.'s post.

The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or decision to submit the work for publication. The majority of the data in this paper have been gathered during routine work at RBHT.

We declare no conflicts of interest.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 13 March 2018.
    • Returned for modification 5 May 2018.
    • Accepted 6 July 2018.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 16 July 2018.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Economou V,
    2. Gousia P
    . 2015. Agriculture and food animals as a source of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Infect Drug Resist 8:49–61. doi:10.2147/IDR.S55778.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Lee B,
    2. Boucher HW
    . 2015. Targeting antimicrobial-resistant bacterial respiratory tract pathogens: it is time to “get smart.” Curr Opin Pulm Med 21:293–303. doi:10.1097/MCP.0000000000000157.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Denning DW,
    2. Cadranel J,
    3. Beigelman-Aubry C,
    4. Ader F,
    5. Chakrabarti A,
    6. Blot S,
    7. Ullmann AJ,
    8. Dimopoulos G,
    9. Lange C
    , European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, European Respiratory Society. 2016. Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: rationale and clinical guidelines for diagnosis and management. Eur Respir J 47:45–68. doi:10.1183/13993003.00583-2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Agarwal R,
    2. Chakrabarti A,
    3. Shah A,
    4. Gupta D,
    5. Meis JF,
    6. Guleria R,
    7. Moss R,
    8. Denning DW
    , ABPA Complicating Asthma ISHAM Working Group. 2013. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: review of literature and proposal of new diagnostic and classification criteria. Clin Exp Allergy 43:850–873. doi:10.1111/cea.12141.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Singh N
    . 2001. Trends in the epidemiology of opportunistic fungal infections: predisposing factors and the impact of antimicrobial use practices. Clin Infect Dis 33:1692–1696. doi:10.1086/323895.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Maschmeyer G,
    2. Haas A,
    3. Cornely OA
    . 2007. Invasive aspergillosis: epidemiology, diagnosis and management in immunocompromised patients. Drugs 67:1567–1601. doi:10.2165/00003495-200767110-00004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Groll AH,
    2. Shah P,
    3. Mentzel C,
    4. Schneider M,
    5. Just-Nuebling G,
    6. Huebner K
    . 1996. Trends in the postmortem epidemiology of invasive fungal infections at a university hospital. J Infect 33:23–32. doi:10.1016/S0163-4453(96)92700-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Denning DW,
    2. Pleuvry A,
    3. Cole DC
    . 2013. Global burden of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis with asthma and its complication chronic pulmonary aspergillosis in adults. Med Mycol 51:361–370. doi:10.3109/13693786.2012.738312.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. van der Linden JWM,
    2. Arendrup MC,
    3. Warris A,
    4. Lagrou K,
    5. Pelloux H,
    6. Hauser PM,
    7. Chryssanthou E,
    8. Mellado E,
    9. Kidd SE,
    10. Tortorano AM,
    11. Dannaoui E,
    12. Gaustad P,
    13. Baddley JW,
    14. Uekötter A,
    15. Lass-Flörl C,
    16. Klimko N,
    17. Moore CB,
    18. Denning DW,
    19. Pasqualotto AC,
    20. Kibbler C,
    21. Arikan-Akdagli S,
    22. Andes D,
    23. Meletiadis J,
    24. Naumiuk L,
    25. Nucci M,
    26. Melchers WJG,
    27. Verweij PE
    . 2015. Prospective multicenter international surveillance of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Emerg Infect Dis 21:1041–1044. doi:10.3201/eid2106.140717.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Faria-Ramos I,
    2. Farinha S,
    3. Neves-Maia J,
    4. Tavares PR,
    5. Miranda IM,
    6. Estevinho LM,
    7. Pina-Vaz C,
    8. Rodrigues AG
    . 2014. Development of cross-resistance by Aspergillus fumigatus to clinical azoles following exposure to prochloraz, an agricultural azole. BMC Microbiol 14:155. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-14-155.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Denning DW,
    2. Park S,
    3. Lass-Florl C,
    4. Fraczek MG,
    5. Kirwan M,
    6. Gore R,
    7. Smith J,
    8. Bueid A,
    9. Moore CB,
    10. Bowyer P,
    11. Perlin DS
    . 2011. High-frequency triazole resistance found in nonculturable aspergillus fumigatus from lungs of patients with chronic fungal disease. Clin Infect Dis 52:1123–1129. doi:10.1093/cid/cir179.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Howard SJ,
    2. Cerar D,
    3. Anderson MJ,
    4. Albarrag A,
    5. Fisher MC,
    6. Pasqualotto AC,
    7. Laverdiere M,
    8. Arendrup MC,
    9. Perlin DS,
    10. Denning DW
    . 2009. Frequency and evolution of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus associated with treatment failure. Emerg Infect Dis 15:1068–1076. doi:10.3201/eid1507.090043.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Guinea J,
    2. Escribano P,
    3. Marcos-Zambrano LJ,
    4. Peláez T,
    5. Kestler M,
    6. Muñoz P,
    7. Vena A,
    8. López-Fabal F,
    9. Bouza E
    . 2016. Therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole helps to decrease the percentage of patients with off-target trough serum levels. Med Mycol 54:353–360. doi:10.1093/mmy/myv099.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Smith J,
    2. Safdar N,
    3. Knasinski V,
    4. Simmons W,
    5. Bhavnani SM,
    6. Ambrose PG,
    7. Andes D
    . 2006. Voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:1570–1572. doi:10.1128/AAC.50.4.1570-1572.2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Walsh TJ,
    2. Raad I,
    3. Patterson TF,
    4. Chandrasekar P,
    5. Donowitz GR,
    6. Graybill R,
    7. Greene RE,
    8. Hachem R,
    9. Hadley S,
    10. Herbrecht R,
    11. Langston A,
    12. Louie A,
    13. Ribaud P,
    14. Segal BH,
    15. Stevens DA,
    16. van Burik J-AH,
    17. White CS,
    18. Corcoran G,
    19. Gogate J,
    20. Krishna G,
    21. Pedicone L,
    22. Hardalo C,
    23. Perfect JR
    . 2007. Treatment of invasive aspergillosis with posaconazole in patients who are refractory to or intolerant of conventional therapy: an externally controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis 44:2–12. doi:10.1086/508774.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Schumock GT,
    2. Li EC,
    3. Suda KJ,
    4. Wiest MD,
    5. Stubbings JA,
    6. Matusiak LM,
    7. Hunkler RJ,
    8. Vermeulen LC
    . 2016. National trends in prescription drug expenditures and projections for 2016. Am J Health Syst Pharm 73:1058–1075. doi:10.2146/ajhp160205.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Barlam TF,
    2. Cosgrove SE,
    3. Abbo LM,
    4. Macdougall C,
    5. Schuetz AN,
    6. Septimus EJ,
    7. Srinivasan A,
    8. Dellit TH,
    9. Falck-Ytter YT,
    10. Fishman NO,
    11. Hamilton CW,
    12. Jenkins TC,
    13. Lipsett PA,
    14. Malani PN,
    15. May LS,
    16. Moran GJ,
    17. Neuhauser MM,
    18. Newland JG,
    19. Ohl CA,
    20. Samore MH,
    21. Seo SK,
    22. Trivedi KK
    . 2016. Executive summary: implementing an antibiotic stewardship program: guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Clin Infect Dis 62:1197–1202. doi:10.1093/cid/ciw217.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Micallef C,
    2. Aliyu SH,
    3. Santos R,
    4. Brown NM,
    5. Rosembert D,
    6. Enoch DA
    . 2014. Introduction of an antifungal stewardship programme targeting high-cost antifungals at a tertiary hospital in Cambridge, England. J Antimicrob Chemother 70:1908–1911. doi:10.1093/jac/dkv040.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    1. López-Medrano F,
    2. San Juan R,
    3. Lizasoain M,
    4. Catalán M,
    5. Ferrari JM,
    6. Chaves F,
    7. Lumbreras C,
    8. Montejo JC,
    9. Herreros de Tejada A,
    10. Aguado JM
    . 2013. A non-compulsory stewardship programme for the management of antifungals in a university-affiliated hospital. Clin Microbiol Infect 19:56–61. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03891.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Valerio M,
    2. Munoz P,
    3. Rodriguez CG,
    4. Caliz B,
    5. Padilla B,
    6. Fernandez-Cruz A,
    7. Sanchez-Somolinos M,
    8. Gijon P,
    9. Peral J,
    10. Gayoso J,
    11. Frias I,
    12. Salcedo M,
    13. Sanjurjo M,
    14. Bouza E,
    15. Bouza E
    , COMIC Study Group Collaborative Group on Mycoses. 2015. Antifungal stewardship in a tertiary-care institution: a bedside intervention. Clin Microbiol Infect 21:492.e1–492.e9. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2015.01.013.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    1. Fisher MC,
    2. Henk DA,
    3. Briggs CJ,
    4. Brownstein JS,
    5. Madoff LC,
    6. McCraw SL,
    7. Gurr SJ
    . 2012. Emerging fungal threats to animal, plant and ecosystem health. Nature 484:186–194. doi:10.1038/nature10947.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Agarwal R,
    2. Vishwanath G,
    3. Aggarwal AN,
    4. Garg M,
    5. Gupta D,
    6. Chakrabarti A
    . 2013. Itraconazole in chronic cavitary pulmonary aspergillosis: a randomised controlled trial and systematic review of literature. Mycoses 56:559–570. doi:10.1111/myc.12075.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Agbetile J,
    2. Bourne M,
    3. Fairs A,
    4. Hargadon B,
    5. Desai D,
    6. Broad C,
    7. Morley J,
    8. Bradding P,
    9. Brightling CE,
    10. Green RH,
    11. Haldar P,
    12. Pashley CH,
    13. Pavord ID,
    14. Wardlaw AJ
    . 2014. Effectiveness of voriconazole in the treatment of Aspergillus fumigatus-associated asthma (EVITA3 study). J Allergy Clin Immunol 134:33–39. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2013.09.050.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    1. Stevens DA,
    2. Schwartz HJ,
    3. Lee JY,
    4. Moskovitz BL,
    5. Jerome DC,
    6. Catanzaro A,
    7. Bamberger DM,
    8. Weinmann AJ,
    9. Tuazon CU,
    10. Judson MA,
    11. Platts-Mills TA,
    12. DeGraff AC, Jr
    . 2000. A randomized trial of itraconazole in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. N Engl J Med 342:756–762. doi:10.1056/NEJM200003163421102.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Cadranel J,
    2. Philippe B,
    3. Hennequin C,
    4. Bergeron A,
    5. Bergot E,
    6. Bourdin A,
    7. Cottin V,
    8. Jeanfaivre T,
    9. Godet C,
    10. Pineau M,
    11. Germaud P
    . 2012. Voriconazole for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: a prospective multicenter trial. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31:3231–3239. doi:10.1007/s10096-012-1690-y.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Felton TW,
    2. Baxter C,
    3. Moore CB,
    4. Roberts SA,
    5. Hope WW,
    6. Denning DW
    . 2010. Efficacy and safety of posaconazole for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis 51:1383–1391. doi:10.1086/657306.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Patterson TF,
    2. Thompson GR,
    3. Denning DW,
    4. Fishman JA,
    5. Hadley S,
    6. Herbrecht R,
    7. Kontoyiannis DP,
    8. Marr KA,
    9. Morrison VA,
    10. Nguyen MH,
    11. Segal BH,
    12. Steinbach WJ,
    13. Stevens DA,
    14. Walsh TJ,
    15. Wingard JR,
    16. Young JAH,
    17. Bennett JE
    . 2016. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aspergillosis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 63:e1–e60. doi:10.1093/cid/ciw326.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Denning DW,
    2. Ribaud P,
    3. Milpied N,
    4. Caillot D,
    5. Herbrecht R,
    6. Thiel E,
    7. Haas A,
    8. Ruhnke M,
    9. Lode H
    . 2002. Efficacy and safety of voriconazole in the treatment of acute invasive aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis 34:563–571. doi:10.1086/324620.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Ceesay MM,
    2. Lewis C,
    3. Smith M,
    4. Wade J,
    5. Flanagan RJ,
    6. Pagliuca A
    . 2016. Triazole antifungals used for prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal disease in adult haematology patients: trough serum concentrations in relation to outcome. Med Mycol 54:691–698. doi:10.1093/mmy/myw031.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved.

View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
A Prospective Real-World Study of the Impact of an Antifungal Stewardship Program in a Tertiary Respiratory-Medicine Setting
Lisa Nwankwo, Jimstan Periselneris, Jamie Cheong, Keith Thompson, Peter Darby, Neil Leaver, Silke Schelenz, Darius Armstrong-James
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Sep 2018, 62 (10) e00402-18; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00402-18

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Prospective Real-World Study of the Impact of an Antifungal Stewardship Program in a Tertiary Respiratory-Medicine Setting
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A Prospective Real-World Study of the Impact of an Antifungal Stewardship Program in a Tertiary Respiratory-Medicine Setting
Lisa Nwankwo, Jimstan Periselneris, Jamie Cheong, Keith Thompson, Peter Darby, Neil Leaver, Silke Schelenz, Darius Armstrong-James
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Sep 2018, 62 (10) e00402-18; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00402-18
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

antifungal agents
antifungal therapy

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596