Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Experimental Therapeutics

Short Proline-Rich Lipopeptide Potentiates Minocycline and Rifampin against Multidrug- and Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Ronald Domalaon, Yaroslav Sanchak, Linet Cherono Koskei, Yinfeng Lyu, George G. Zhanel, Gilbert Arthur, Frank Schweizer
Ronald Domalaon
aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yaroslav Sanchak
aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linet Cherono Koskei
bDepartment of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
cSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yinfeng Lyu
aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
dInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, People's Republic of China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George G. Zhanel
eDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gilbert Arthur
bDepartment of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank Schweizer
aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
eDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Frank Schweizer
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02374-17
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

A series of 16 short proline-rich lipopeptides (SPRLPs) were constructed to mimic longer naturally existing proline-rich antimicrobial peptides. Antibacterial assessment revealed that lipopeptides containing hexadecanoic acid (C16) possess optimal antibacterial activity relative to others with shorter lipid components. SPRLPs were further evaluated for their potential to serve as adjuvants in combination with existing antibiotics to enhance antibacterial activity against drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Out of 16 prepared SPRLPs, C12-PRP was found to significantly potentiate the antibiotics minocycline and rifampin against multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant (MDR/XDR) P. aeruginosa clinical isolates. This nonhemolytic C12-PRP is comprised of the heptapeptide sequence PRPRPRP-NH2 acylated to dodecanoic acid (C12) at the N terminus. The adjuvant potency of C12-PRP was apparent by its ability to reduce the MIC of minocycline and rifampin below their interpretative susceptibility breakpoints against MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa. An attempt to optimize C12-PRP through peptidomimetic modification was performed by replacing all l- to d-amino acids. C12-PRP demonstrated that it was amenable to optimization, since synergism with minocycline and rifampin were retained. Moreover, C12-PRP displayed no cytotoxicity against human liver carcinoma HepG2 and human embryonic kidney HEK-293 cell lines. Thus, the SPRLP C12-PRP is a lead adjuvant candidate that warrants further optimization. The discovery of agents that are able to resuscitate the activity of existing antibiotics against drug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, especially P. aeruginosa, is of great clinical interest.

INTRODUCTION

The increasing incidence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection imposes a significant burden in our current health care system (1, 2). Infections caused by P. aeruginosa are difficult to treat, since this pathogen often harbors multiple resistance mechanisms against most currently used antibiotics (3, 4). Intrinsic resistance in P. aeruginosa is a major hurdle to overcome. The protective outer membrane (OM) of P. aeruginosa is comprised of selective porins and a polar lipopolysaccharide (LPS) barrier that is 12 to 100 times less permeable than that of Escherichia coli (5). Compounds which are able to cross the OM and enter the periplasm are prone to efflux by up to 12 overexpressed multidrug efflux systems that prevent most antibiotics from reaching the required intracellular concentration for their antibacterial action (6, 7). As a result, there is currently a strong interest to identify novel agents that are able to enhance membrane permeability and compromise active efflux in Gram-negative bacillary pathogens such as P. aeruginosa (8).

Proline-rich antimicrobial peptides (PRAMPs) are amphiphilic cationic peptides typically possessing potent Gram-negative but poor Gram-positive antibacterial activity (9, 10). They are characterized by an unusual large amount of l-proline residues (typically 25 to 50% of sequence composition) and frequently contain a repeating PXP or PXXP motif, where X may be any amino acid but is typically l-arginine (9, 10). Well-known examples include mammal-derived Bac7(1-35) (11) (sequence, RRIRPRPRLPRPRPRPLPFPRPGPRPIPRPLPFP) and PR-39 (12) (sequence, RRRPRPPYLPRPRPPPFFPPRLPPRIPPGFPPRFPPRFP-NH2) and insect-derived apidaecins (13). PRAMPs eradicate bacteria in a dose-dependent bimodular fashion. At low concentrations, they are believed to target the 70S ribosome and the DnaK chaperone (14, 15). Conversely, they eradicate pathogens via lysis at high concentrations (15). PRAMPs enter the OM via a poorly understood mechanism (presumably through a “self-promoted” uptake mechanism similar to that of most cationic peptides) (16). Inner membrane transporters SbmA and MdtM proteins facilitate their promiscuous cytosolic uptake (17, 18). However, Gram-negative P. aeruginosa does not express both SbmA and MdtM; therefore, the mode of action of PRAMPs is restricted to membrane rupture and lysis (19). With the urgent need for new therapeutic agents/strategies to treat drug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections, PRAMPs are considered an emerging source of potential new antibiotics.

In addition to antimicrobials that directly kill bacteria, adjuvants that sensitize resistant pathogens to existing antibiotics are widely studied (20, 21). In fact, several combinations of a β-lactamase inhibitor (adjuvant) and a β-lactam (antibiotic) are already used to treat drug-resistant Gram-negative bacillary infections (22, 23). Adjuvants act on bacterial processes that may elicit direct or indirect advantageous effects toward its partner antibiotic. For instance, adjuvants that inhibit β-lactamase enzymes prevent the degradation of β-lactam antibiotics. Adjuvants that disrupt the bacterial membrane may enhance cellular permeation of otherwise membrane-impermeable antibiotics.

In this study, we evaluated the antibacterial activity of synthetic short proline-rich lipopeptides (SPRLPs) against clinically relevant Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. The short peptide sequence of SPRLPs was inspired by the repeating PXP motif apparent in longer PRAMPs. Moreover, we assessed the potential of these SPRLPs to serve as adjuvants in combination with clinically used antibiotics against P. aeruginosa. Our results revealed an amphiphilic nonhemolytic noncytotoxic l-lipopeptide lead sequence that strongly potentiates minocycline and rifampin against MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa. Furthermore, the adjuvant potency is retained in its enantiomeric d-SPRLP counterpart.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

SPRLP design is inspired by repeating PXP motif in PRAMPs.Inspired by peptide sequences of longer and naturally occurring PRAMPs such as Bac7(1-35) and PR-39, we prepared shorter synthetic versions possessing a lipoheptapeptide sequence of PRPZPRP, where Z represents either R, G, L or W (Table 1). The observed PXP repeats in naturally occurring PRAMPs were retained in the heptapeptide sequence. Position Z was incorporated to introduce amino acid variability, resulting in four sequence subsets, namely PRP, PGP, PLP, and PWP sequences (Table 1). Amino acid variability was integrated in the design to “fine-tune” the overall physicochemical property of SPRLP at the heptapeptide portion. For instance, incorporation of l-arginine imparts an additional protonizable guanidine side chain, whereas l-leucine imparts additional hydrophobicity. l-Tryptophan was added for its aromatic ring side chain, while l-glycine was selected to see the effect of replacing the carbon-based side chain groups with hydrogen. Aliphatic lipids such as octanoic acid (C8), dodecanoic acid (C12), and hexadecanoic acid (C16) were ligated to the N terminus of the cationic heptapeptide to vary the hydrophobic or amphiphilic moment in the SPRLPs (24–26). We also included the more rigid and conformationally constrained lipid 1-adamantaneacetic acid (Ad) in our study. The bulky hydrophobic adamantane moiety is perceived to be less prone to toxicity issues than longer aliphatic hydrocarbons. The C terminus of each peptide was also amidated. Sixteen acylated SPRLPs were synthesized to explore the effect of peptide sequence and amphiphilicity on their biological activity.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

SPRLP sequences under consideration

SPRLPs composed of longer hydrocarbons demonstrate antibacterial activity.The synthesized SPRLPs were evaluated for their antibacterial potency against a panel of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (Tables 2 and 3). Some of the included pathogens were collected from patients visiting or admitted to participating Canadian hospitals through the CAN-ICU (27) and CANWARD (28) national surveillance studies. Antibacterial activity was assessed using MICs against various clinical pathogens.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Biological activity of SPRLPs belonging to PRP and PGP sequence subsets

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Biological activity of SPRLPs belonging to PLP and PWP sequence subsets

The Gram-negative-specific antibacterial activity of naturally existing PRAMPs was not observed for the synthesized SPRLPs. Among the four sequence subsets, peptides acylated with C16 displayed better antibacterial activity than those acylated with C8, C12, or Ad. Three of the four peptides comprising C16 showed promising activity. C16-PRP displayed broad-spectrum activity (Table 2), with an MIC range of 4 to 16 μg/ml against Gram-positive bacteria and an MIC range of 8 to 16 μg/ml against the Gram-negative bacterium E. coli. Moderate activity against Gram-positive bacteria (MIC range of 8 to 32 μg/ml) was demonstrated by C16-PGP (Table 2). The lipopeptide C16-PWP also exhibited good activity (MIC range of 4 to 8 μg/ml) against Gram-positive bacteria (Table 3). Overall, the SPRLPs reported herein appeared to be active mostly against Gram-positive organisms.

Nonspecific membrane lysis limits therapeutic potential.Since PRAMPs are able to kill bacteria through membrane lysis, it is imperative to evaluate whether these synthesized SPRLPs also lyse eukaryotic membranes. The ability to lyse porcine red blood cells was assessed, and the minimum concentration resulting in 5% erythrocyte hemolysis (MHC) was reported (Tables 2 and 3). SPRLPs acylated with the long hydrocarbon C16 showed high hemolytic activity. C16-PRP, C16-PGP, C16-PLP, and C16-PWP resulted in 5% red blood cell hemolysis at 16 μg/ml. These data corroborate that the observed antibacterial activity of these four SPRLPs is through nonspecific membrane lysis and therefore greatly limits their therapeutic potential. The lipopeptide C12-PWP demonstrated marginal hemolytic activity, with an MHC of 64 μg/ml. However, all other SPRLPs were nonhemolytic (MHC > 512 μg/ml).

Potentiation of minocycline and rifampin by an SPRLP against MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa.Adjuvants typically do not kill the pathogens directly but are able to help their antibiotic partner broaden their antibacterial spectrum or maximize their antibacterial activity. A literature search revealed only one report of a PRAMP that can synergize a clinically used antibiotic against Gram-negative bacilli. The long proline-rich peptide dimer A3-APO, consisting of 41 amino acids, was found to potentiate chloramphenicol against Klebsiella pneumoniae in a checkerboard assay (29). However, an amphiphilic lysine-based peptide-like agent was reported to potentiate rifampin in E. coli (30). We therefore were interested in studying whether our short proline-rich heptapeptide-based SPRLPs possessed adjuvant properties. Certainly, it is advantageous to have a lead molecule of shorter peptide sequence, as it is more cost-effective and more amenable to peptidomimetic modifications for further optimization.

We evaluated the activity of SPRLPs in combination with 15 clinically used antibiotics (see Tables S1 to S3 in the supplemental material) against P. aeruginosa. The antibiotics tested included fluoroquinolones (moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin), aminoglycosides (gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin), cephalosporins (ceftazidime and cefotaxime), carbapenems (meropenem and doripenem), aztreonam, rifampin, minocycline, colistin, and fosfomycin. The SPRLPs were screened initially at a fixed concentration of 8 μg/ml (5 μM) in combination with antibiotics against wild-type P. aeruginosa PAO1. We assessed potentiation based on at least a 4-fold absolute reduction in MIC of the antibiotic, after which synergism was further validated by a conventional checkerboard assay. Fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) indexes of ≤0.5, 0.5 < x ≤ 4, and >4 were interpreted as indicating synergistic, indifferent, and antagonistic interactions, respectively (31). The FIC index was obtained by adding the FIC values of the antibiotic and the SPRLP adjuvant. The FIC of antibiotics was calculated by dividing the MIC of the antibiotic in the presence of the adjuvant by the MIC of the antibiotic alone. Similarly, the FIC of the adjuvant was calculated by dividing the MIC of the adjuvant in the presence of the antibiotic by the MIC of the adjuvant alone.

Of the 15 clinically used antibiotics and 16 short synthetic SPRLPs, an initial screening revealed potentiation of minocycline and rifampin with the amphiphilic lipopeptide C12-PRP (Table S1). Further validation by a checkerboard assay confirmed the synergistic combinations against wild-type P. aeruginosa strain PAO1. C12-PRP with either minocycline or rifampin yielded an FIC index of 0.19 or 0.14, respectively. These findings warranted further studies, since C12-PRP is nonhemolytic even at a high concentration of 512 μg/ml (Table 2). We evaluated whether the observed synergism was retained against MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa clinical isolates. But, we also investigated the capability of C12-PRP to reduce the absolute MICs of minocycline and rifampin below their susceptibility breakpoints. No established minocycline and rifampin susceptibility breakpoints currently exist for Pseudomonas aeruginosa from either the CLSI or the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Therefore, we cautiously used established breakpoints for other organisms that are as similar as possible to Pseudomonas aeruginosa for our comparison. According to CLSI (32), the susceptibility breakpoint of minocycline for Acinetobacter spp. is ≤4 μg/ml, while the susceptibility breakpoint of rifampin for Staphylococcus spp. is ≤1 μg/ml.

The combination of minocycline and C12-PRP was found to be strongly synergistic against all eight tested MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa isolates (Table 4). Moreover, the MIC of minocycline in the presence of 8 μg/ml (5 μM) C12-PRP was reduced below the susceptibility breakpoint in seven out of nine strains. Significant potentiation was also observed for the combination of rifampin and C12-PRP against MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa isolates (Table 5). At 8 μg/ml (5 μM) C12-PRP, the MIC of rifampin reached the susceptibility breakpoint in five out of nine strains. Indeed, the SPRLP C12-PRP was able to enhance the antibacterial potency of minocycline and rifampin against wild-type and clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa. The potential of this SPRLP as a lead adjuvant candidate is apparent. The mechanism of antibiotic potentiation certainly warrants further study in the future. However, membrane perturbation that results in enhanced antibiotic uptake is a likely possibility. PRAMPs are known to disrupt bacterial membranes, which is more pronounced in P. aeruginosa than in other Gram-negative bacilli (19). This suggests that the SPRLP C12-PRP may potentiate minocycline and rifampin through OM permeabilization of P. aeruginosa. Membrane perturbation may also compromise the activity of integral membrane proteins such as multidrug efflux pumps, essentially halting antibiotic resistance through active efflux.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4

Adjuvant potency of amphiphilic C12-PRP in combination with minocycline against wild-type and MDR/XDR P. aeruginosaa

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 5

Adjuvant potency of amphiphilic C12-PRP in combination with rifampin against wild-type and MDR/XDR P. aeruginosaa

The type of fatty acyl ligated to the peptide sequence PRPRPRP-NH2 is important for adjuvant activity.Since the lead adjuvant C12-PRP was discovered from a synergy scan having a fixed 8-μg/ml (5 μM) SPRLP concentration, combinations of minocycline or rifampin with other PRP subset lipopeptides warranted further investigation. Therefore, we assessed the interaction of either C8-PRP, C16-PRP, or Ad-PRP with minocycline or rifampin by a checkerboard assay. The three synthetic SPRLPs displayed indifferent interactions with minocycline and rifampin (Table S4). Interestingly, C16-PRP did not display synergism with either antibiotic, even though our initial data suggested that it can disrupt and lyse membranes. These data suggest that the aliphatic lipid C12 is optimal for amphiphilic SPRLPs to potentiate minocycline and rifampin against P. aeruginosa.

The d-lipopeptide counterpart of C12-PRP retains adjuvant potency.The amphiphilic C12-PRP is considered susceptible to nonspecific proteolytic degradation, since host enzymes (e.g., human proteases) easily recognize l-amino acid peptide bonds. Therefore, lead peptide agents typically undergo peptidomimetic modifications to increase serum stability (10, 33). We explored one approach to optimize C12-PRP by synthesizing the same sequence but with d- instead of l-amino acids, yielding the d-lipopeptide analog C12-prp. Peptide bonds formed by d-amino acids are less prone to mammalian proteases (34). Like C12-PRP, C12-prp was found to be inactive (MIC > 128 μg/ml) against wild-type and clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa. The adjuvant properties of C12-PRP were retained, but the potency was slightly reduced in the d-lipopeptide analog. C12-prp potentiated minocycline and rifampin against wild-type and MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa isolates (Tables 6 and 7). Furthermore, 8 μg/ml (5 μM) of C12-prp reduced the MICs of minocycline (Table 6) and rifampin (Table 7) below susceptibility breakpoints in some MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa clinical isolates. These results suggest that C12-PRP is amenable to peptidomimetic alterations and that further lead optimizations are possible.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 6

Adjuvant potency of amphiphilic C12-prp in combination with minocycline against wild-type and MDR/XDR P. aeruginosaa

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 7

Adjuvant potency of amphiphilic C12-prp in combination with rifampin against wild-type and MDR/XDR P. aeruginosaa

Amphiphilic C12-PRP is not cytotoxic to eukaryotic cells.Our initial assessment of the effect of SPRLPs on eukaryotic membranes revealed that C12-PRP is nonhemolytic. In fact, the concentration resulting in 5% red blood cell hemolysis for C12-PRP was >512 μg/ml. At 512 μg/ml (366 μM), C12-PRP resulted in only 4.6% ± 0.2% hemolysis (Fig. 1A). We then evaluated the potential toxicity of C12-PRP against two eukaryotic cell lines, which included human liver carcinoma HepG2 and human embryonic kidney HEK-293, by its ability to inhibit cellular proliferation and cellular viability (Table S5). We used colistin (also known as polymyxin E) and adriamycin as internal controls to represent clinically used peptide antibiotics and anticancer drugs, respectively. Amphiphilic C12-PRP did not inhibit cellular proliferation of either cell line (Fig. 1B and C) up to the highest concentration tested (50 μM), notably 10-fold higher than the C12-PRP's adjuvant working concentration (5 μM). Interestingly, a 1.5 μM concentration of the antibiotic colistin inhibited the proliferation of HepG2 cells to 50% (50% inhibitory concentration [IC50]). The anticancer drug adriamycin inhibited the growth of both cell lines at very low concentrations. We further evaluated cytotoxicity by assessing the effect of the agents on the global oxidoreductive metabolism of cells through the MTS assay (Fig. 1D and E). Neither C12-PRP nor colistin killed either cell line up to the highest concentration tested (50 μM). Congruent with results from the proliferation assay, adriamycin drastically reduced the viability of both cell lines at a low concentration. Our data presented herein strongly suggest that the amphiphilic C12-PRP is not cytotoxic to eukaryotic cells.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Evaluation of cytotoxicity of amphiphilic C12-PRP (red circles) via hemolytic activity against erythrocytes (A), inhibition of cellular proliferation against human liver carcinoma HepG2 cells (B), inhibition of cellular proliferation against human embryonic kidney HEK-293 cells (C), cytotoxic effects against human liver carcinoma HepG2 cells (D), and cytotoxic effects against human embryonic kidney HEK-293 cells (E). All experiments were performed in three or more replicates. Colistin (blue squares) and adriamycin (green triangles) were used to represent clinically used peptide antibiotics and anticancer drugs, respectively. Error bars indicate standard deviations of results from three independent experiments (n = 3).

Conclusion.An amphiphilic short proline-rich lipopeptide that synergizes with two clinically used antibiotics was identified for the first time. The nonhemolytic lipopeptide C12-PRP, with a short sequence of C12-PRPRPRP-NH2, potentiates minocycline and rifampin against wild-type and MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa isolates. More importantly, C12-PRP significantly reduced the MICs of minocycline and rifampin against P. aeruginosa below their interpretative susceptibility breakpoints. Furthermore, our data strongly suggest that C12-PRP is noncytotoxic. However, instability to proteases remains a drawback. Our initial attempt of optimization by incorporating d-amino acids retained the desired adjuvant property of the lipopeptide, and therefore, C12-PRP appeared to be amenable to peptidomimetic modification. Envisioned future work includes further optimization to bestow protease stability and to enhance the adjuvant profile of C12-PRP, by incorporating peptoids and unnatural amino acids to the C12-PRP structure. Indeed, peptide-based antibacterial drug candidates such as murepavadin (also known as POL7080) (35) and brilacidin (36), both in phase-2 clinical trials, were optimized to remove their “peptide-like” nature prior to clinical validation. Furthermore, the in vivo efficacy of the lipopeptide-antibiotic combination will be assessed in insect models of infection. Mode-of-action studies to explore the effects of the lead lipopeptide on the OM, inner membrane, and proton motive force that can result in increased intracellular concentrations of minocycline and rifampin are planned (37, 38).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Peptide preparation.All lipopeptides were synthesized on solid-phase methylbenzhydrylamine (MBHA) Rink amide resin by following a standard fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl (Fmoc) chemistry protocol (39, 40). Amino acids with reactive side chain functional groups were masked with protecting groups inert to solid-phase peptide synthesis conditions yet labile upon peptide cleavage from the solid support. Therefore, Fmoc-Arg(Pbf)-OH and Fmoc-Trp(Boc)-OH were purchased to prevent the guanidine and indole side chain, respectively, to cause unwanted reactions. The coupling reagent O-(benzotriazol-1-yl)-N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyluronium tetrafluoroborate (TBTU) and N-methylmorpholine were used to induce peptide bond formation between amino acids. All reagents and solvents were purchased from commercially available sources and used without further purification.

SPRLPs were purified via reverse-phase flash chromatography using C18 (40- to 63-μm) silica gel purchased from Silicycle (USA). Purity was assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and determined to be >95%. Each peptide was characterized using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and mass spectrometry (MS). One (1H and 13C)- and two-dimensional NMR experiments were performed on either a Bruker AMX-500 or Bruker AMX-300 instrument (Germany). Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) experiments were performed on a Varian 500-MS ion trap mass spectrometer (USA), and high-resolution matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) experiments were done on a Bruker Ultraflextreme mass spectrometer (Germany) coupled to a time-of-flight mass analyzer.

Bacterial strains.Isolates used in this study were obtained from either the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), the Canadian National Intensive Care Unit (CAN-ICU) surveillance study (27), or the Canadian Ward Surveillance (CANWARD) study (28). Clinical isolates belonging to the CAN-ICU and CANWARD studies were recovered from patients suffering presumed infectious diseases who were admitted to a participating medical center across Canada during the time of study. MDR P. aeruginosa strains in this study refer to those that are resistant to aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, cephalosporins, and carbapenems, while XDR strains are those that are resistant to aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, cephalosporins, carbapenems, aztreonam, and penicillin–β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (37, 38).

Antimicrobial susceptibility assay.A broth microdilution susceptibility test following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (32) was performed to assess the in vitro antibacterial activity of SPRLPs. Bacterial cultures grown overnight were diluted in saline to achieve a 0.5 McFarland turbidity, followed by 1:50 dilution in Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB) for inoculation to a final concentration of 5 × 105 CFU/ml. The assay was done on a 96-well plate in which the agents of interest were 2-fold serially diluted in MHB and incubated with equal volumes of inoculum at 37°C for 18 h. MIC was determined as the lowest concentration to inhibit visible bacterial growth in the form of turbidity, which was confirmed using an EMax Plus microplate reader (Molecular Devices, USA) at a wavelength of 590 nm. The wells containing MHB broth with or without bacterial cells were used as positive or negative controls, respectively.

Hemolytic assay.The ability of SPRLPs to lyse eukaryotic red blood cells was quantified based on the amount of hemoglobin released upon incubation with pig erythrocytes, in accordance with published protocols (37, 39). Fresh pig blood drawn from the pig antecubital vein was centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) three times, and resuspended in the same buffer, consecutively. Agents of interest were then 2-fold serially diluted in PBS on a 96-well plate and mixed with equal volumes of the erythrocyte solution. After 1 h of incubation at 37°C, intact cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 1,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C. The supernatant was then transferred to a new 96-well plate. The hemoglobin released was measured with an EMax Plus microplate reader (Molecular Devices, USA) at a 570-nm wavelength. Erythrocytes in PBS with or without 0.1% Triton X-100 were used as negative or positive controls, respectively.

Synergy scan testing.The synergy assay was performed on a 96-well plate in which the agents of interest were 2-fold serially diluted in working MHB. Prior to serial dilution, SPRLP was added to the working MHB medium so that a fixed final concentration of 8 μg/ml (5 μM) SPRLP per well was achieved. To ensure that the assay was working, the MIC determination test of the studied antibiotic (without SPRLP) was included on the same plate. Similar MIC results between the assay comparator and an independent MIC determination test (on a different plate) ensured the validity of the synergy test. Bacterial cultures grown overnight were diluted in saline to 0.5 McFarland turbidity, followed by 1:50 dilution in MHB (without SPRLP) and inoculation into each well to a final concentration of approximately 5 × 105 CFU/ml. Wells containing only MHB (without SPRLP) with or without bacterial cells were used as positive or negative controls, respectively. The plate was then incubated at 37°C for 18 h and examined for visible turbidity, which was confirmed using an EMax Plus microplate reader (Molecular Devices, USA) at a wavelength of 590 nm. An antibiotic MIC reduction of ≥4-fold in the presence of 8 μg/ml (5 μM) SPRLP denoted a positive synergy result and was further validated by a checkerboard assay.

Checkerboard assay.The checkerboard assay was done on a 96-well plate as previously described (38, 41). The agent of interest was 2-fold serially diluted along the x axis, while the adjuvant was 2-fold serially diluted along the y axis to create a matrix in which each well consisted of a combination of both agent and adjuvant at different concentrations. Bacterial cultures grown overnight were diluted in saline to 0.5 McFarland turbidity, followed by 1:50 dilution in MHB and inoculation on each well to a final concentration of approximately 5 × 105 CFU/ml. Wells containing only MHB with or without bacterial cells were used as positive or negative controls, respectively. The plate was incubated at 37°C for 18 h and examined for visible turbidity, which was confirmed using an EMax Plus microplate reader (Molecular Devices, USA) at a wavelength of 590 nm. The fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) of antibiotic was calculated by dividing the MIC of antibiotic in the presence of adjuvant by the MIC of antibiotic alone. Similarly, the FIC of adjuvant was calculated by dividing the MIC of adjuvant in the presence of antibiotic by the MIC of adjuvant alone. The FIC index was obtained by the summation of both FIC values. The FIC index was interpreted as synergistic, indifferent, or antagonistic for values of ≤0.5, 0.5 < x ≤ 4, or >4, respectively (31).

Proliferation assay.The CyQuant Direct cell proliferation assay kit (ThermoFisher, Canada) was used to assess the effect of C12-PRP on cell proliferation according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293) and HepG2 cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. The cells were dispersed into 96-well plates (8,000 cells/well in 100 μl). Wells with medium but no cells were used as blanks. After 24 h, various concentrations of C12-PRP, colistin, and adriamycin were added to the wells containing cells but also the blanks. After incubation of the cells with the compounds for 48 h, the CyQuant Direct detection reagent was added to the wells. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 1 h, and the fluorescence (excitation, 480 nm; emission, 535 nm) was read using a SpectraMax M2e (Molecular Devices, USA). As a positive control, CyQuant Direct detection reagent was added to a plate with untreated cells and incubated for 1 h, followed by fluorescence reading. The number of cells in each well was determined by detaching the cells by trypsin followed by counting on a CoulterZM counter to ensure approximately equal numbers of cells per well.

Cytotoxicity assay.The cytotoxic effects of C12-PRP was assessed by measuring its effect on the viability of HEK-293 or HepG2 cells. The cells were dispersed into 96-well plates, and after 24 h, C12-PRP, colistin, or adriamycin was added as described in the proliferation assay. After incubation for 48 h, the viability of the cells was determined with the MTS reagent (Promega, Canada) as previously described (42).

Statistical analysis.Data herein represent the means ± standard deviations (error bars) of the results of at least three independent experiments. The null hypothesis was evaluated via one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), where the confidence interval was set to be 95% (P < 0.05).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC) (NSERC-DG 261311-2013) and a Manitoba Health Research Council (MHRC) graduate studentship scholarship.

We thank Charles M. Nyachoti (University of Manitoba) for generously supplying fresh porcine erythrocytes.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 20 November 2017.
    • Returned for modification 18 December 2017.
    • Accepted 27 January 2018.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 5 February 2018.
  • Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02374-17.

  • Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Safaei HG,
    2. Moghim S,
    3. Isfahani BN,
    4. Fazeli H,
    5. Poursina F,
    6. Yadegari S,
    7. Nasirmoghadas P,
    8. Hosseininassab Nodoushan SA
    . 2017. Distribution of the strains of multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant, and pandrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from burn patients. Adv Biomed Res 6:74. doi:10.4103/abr.abr_239_16.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Cerceo E,
    2. Deitelzweig SB,
    3. Sherman BM,
    4. Amin AN
    . 2016. Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections in the hospital setting: overview, implications for clinical practice, and emerging treatment options. Microb Drug Resist 22:412–431. doi:10.1089/mdr.2015.0220.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Potron A,
    2. Poirel L,
    3. Nordmann P
    . 2015. Emerging broad-spectrum resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii: mechanisms and epidemiology. Int J Antimicrob Agents 45:568–585. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.03.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Gellatly SL,
    2. Hancock REW
    . 2013. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: new insights into pathogenesis and host defenses. Pathog Dis 67:159–173. doi:10.1111/2049-632X.12033.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Breidenstein EBM,
    2. de la Fuente-Nunez C,
    3. Hancock REW
    . 2011. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: all roads lead to resistance. Trends Microbiol 19:419–246. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2011.04.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kumar A,
    2. Schweizer HP
    . 2005. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics: active efflux and reduced uptake. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 57:1486–1513. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2005.04.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Silver LL
    . 2016. A Gestalt approach to Gram-negative entry. Bioorg Med Chem 24:6379–6389. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2016.06.044.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Huwaitat R,
    2. McCloskey AP,
    3. Gilmore BF,
    4. Laverty G
    . 2016. Potential strategies for the eradication of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. Future Microbiol 11:955–972. doi:10.2217/fmb-2016-0035.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Li W,
    2. Tailhades J,
    3. O'Brien-Simpson NM,
    4. Separovic F,
    5. Otvos LJ,
    6. Hossain MA,
    7. Wade JD
    . 2014. Proline-rich antimicrobial peptides: potential therapeutics against antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Amino Acids 46:2287–2294. doi:10.1007/s00726-014-1820-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Domalaon R,
    2. Zhanel GG,
    3. Schweizer F
    . 2016. Short antimicrobial peptides and peptide scaffolds as promising antibacterial agents. Curr Top Med Chem 16:1217–1230. doi:10.2174/1568026615666150915112459.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    1. Benincasa M,
    2. Scocchi M,
    3. Podda E,
    4. Skerlavaj B,
    5. Dolzani L,
    6. Gennaro R
    . 2004. Antimicrobial activity of Bac7 fragments against drug-resistant clinical isolates. Peptides 25:2055–2061. doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2004.08.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Holani R,
    2. Shah C,
    3. Haji Q,
    4. Inglis GD,
    5. Uwiera RRE,
    6. Cobo ER
    . 2016. Proline-arginine rich (PR-39) cathelicidin: structure, expression and functional implication in intestinal health. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 49:95–101. doi:10.1016/j.cimid.2016.10.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    1. Li W-F,
    2. Ma G-X,
    3. Zhou X-X
    . 2006. Apidaecin-type peptides: biodiversity, structure-function relationships and mode of action. Peptides 27:2350–2359. doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2006.03.016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Krizsan A,
    2. Volke D,
    3. Weinert S,
    4. Strater N,
    5. Knappe D,
    6. Hoffmann R
    . 2014. Insect-derived proline-rich antimicrobial peptides kill bacteria by inhibiting bacterial protein translation at the 70S ribosome. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 53:12236–12239. doi:10.1002/anie.201407145.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Podda E,
    2. Benincasa M,
    3. Pacor S,
    4. Micali F,
    5. Mattiuzzo M,
    6. Gennaro R,
    7. Scocchi M
    . 2006. Dual mode of action of Bac7, a proline-rich antibacterial peptide. Biochim Biophys Acta 1760:1732–1740. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2006.09.006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Holfeld L,
    2. Hoffmann R,
    3. Knappe D
    . 2017. Correlating uptake and activity of proline-rich antimicrobial peptides in Escherichia coli. Anal Bioanal Chem 409:5581–5592. doi:10.1007/s00216-017-0496-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    1. Runti G,
    2. Lopez Ruiz M del C,
    3. Stoilova T,
    4. Hussain R,
    5. Jennions M,
    6. Choudhury HG,
    7. Benincasa M,
    8. Gennaro R,
    9. Beis K,
    10. Scocchi M
    . 2013. Functional characterization of SbmA, a bacterial inner membrane transporter required for importing the antimicrobial peptide Bac7(1-35). J Bacteriol 195:5343–5351. doi:10.1128/JB.00818-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Graf M,
    2. Mardirossian M,
    3. Nguyen F,
    4. Seefeldt AC,
    5. Guichard G,
    6. Scocchi M,
    7. Innis CA,
    8. Wilson DN
    . 2017. Proline-rich antimicrobial peptides targeting protein synthesis. Nat Prod Rep 34:702–711. doi:10.1039/C7NP00020K.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    1. Runti G,
    2. Benincasa M,
    3. Giuffrida G,
    4. Devescovi G,
    5. Venturi V,
    6. Gennaro R,
    7. Scocchi M
    . 2017. The mechanism of killing by the proline-rich peptide Bac7(1-35) against clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa differs from that against other Gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e01660-16. doi:10.1128/AAC.01660-16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Gill EE,
    2. Franco OL,
    3. Hancock REW
    . 2015. Antibiotic adjuvants: diverse strategies for controlling drug-resistant pathogens. Chem Biol Drug Des 85:56–78. doi:10.1111/cbdd.12478.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Bernal P,
    2. Molina-Santiago C,
    3. Daddaoua A,
    4. Llamas MA
    . 2013. Antibiotic adjuvants: identification and clinical use. Microb Biotechnol 6:445–449. doi:10.1111/1751-7915.12044.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    1. Toussaint KA,
    2. Gallagher JC
    . 2015. Beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations: from then to now. Ann Pharmacother 49:86–98. doi:10.1177/1060028014556652.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Shlaes DM
    . 2013. New beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations in clinical development. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1277:105–114. doi:10.1111/nyas.12010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Sivertsen A,
    2. Isaksson J,
    3. Leiros H-KS,
    4. Svenson J,
    5. Svendsen J-S,
    6. Brandsdal BO
    . 2014. Synthetic cationic antimicrobial peptides bind with their hydrophobic parts to drug site II of human serum albumin. BMC Struct Biol 14:4. doi:10.1186/1472-6807-14-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    1. Findlay B,
    2. Szelemej P,
    3. Zhanel GG,
    4. Schweizer F
    . 2012. Guanidylation and tail effects in cationic antimicrobial lipopeptoids. PLoS One 7:e41141. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041141.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    1. Svenson J,
    2. Brandsdal B-O,
    3. Stensen W,
    4. Svendsen JS
    . 2007. Albumin binding of short cationic antimicrobial micropeptides and its influence on the in vitro bactericidal effect. J Med Chem 50:3334–3339. doi:10.1021/jm0703542.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Zhanel GG,
    2. DeCorby M,
    3. Laing N,
    4. Weshnoweski B,
    5. Vashisht R,
    6. Tailor F,
    7. Nichol KA,
    8. Wierzbowski A,
    9. Baudry PJ,
    10. Karlowsky JA,
    11. Lagacé-Wiens P,
    12. Walkty A,
    13. McCracken M,
    14. Mulvey MR,
    15. Johnson J
    , Canadian Antimicrobial Resistance Alliance (CARA), Hoban DJ. 2008. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens in intensive care units in Canada: results of the Canadian National Intensive Care Unit (CAN-ICU) study, 2005-2006. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:1430–1437. doi:10.1128/AAC.01538-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Zhanel GG,
    2. Adam HJ,
    3. Baxter MR,
    4. Fuller J,
    5. Nichol KA,
    6. Denisuik AJ,
    7. Lagacé-Wiens P,
    8. Walkty A,
    9. Karlowsky JA,
    10. Schweizer F,
    11. Hoban DJ
    , Canadian Antimicrobial Resistance Alliance. 2013. Antimicrobial susceptibility of 22746 pathogens from Canadian hospitals: results of the CANWARD 2007–11 study. J Antimicrob Chemother 68(Suppl 1):i7–22. doi:10.1093/jac/dkt022.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Cassone M,
    2. Vogiatzi P,
    3. La Montagna R,
    4. De Olivier Inacio V,
    5. Cudic P,
    6. Wade JD,
    7. Otvos L, Jr
    . 2008. Scope and limitations of the designer proline-rich antibacterial peptide dimer, A3-APO, alone or in synergy with conventional antibiotics. Peptides 29:1878–1886. doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2008.07.016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Jammal J,
    2. Zaknoon F,
    3. Kaneti G,
    4. Goldberg K,
    5. Mor A
    . 2015. Sensitization of Gram-negative bacteria to rifampin and OAK combinations. Sci Rep 5:9216. doi:10.1038/srep09216.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    1. Meletiadis J,
    2. Pournaras S,
    3. Roilides E,
    4. Walsh TJ
    . 2010. Defining fractional inhibitory concentration index cutoffs for additive interactions based on self-drug additive combinations, Monte Carlo simulation analysis, and in vitro-in vivo correlation data for antifungal drug combinations against Aspergillus fumi. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:602–609. doi:10.1128/AAC.00999-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2016. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. CLSI supplement M100S, 26th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  33. 33.↵
    1. Qvit N,
    2. Rubin SJS,
    3. Urban TJ,
    4. Mochly-Rosen D,
    5. Gross ER
    . 2017. Peptidomimetic therapeutics: scientific approaches and opportunities. Drug Discov Today 22:454–462. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2016.11.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. Weinstock MT,
    2. Francis JN,
    3. Redman JS,
    4. Kay MS
    . 2012. Protease-resistant peptide design-empowering nature's fragile warriors against HIV. Biopolymers 98:431–442. doi:10.1002/bip.22073.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Srinivas N,
    2. Jetter P,
    3. Ueberbacher BJ,
    4. Werneburg M,
    5. Zerbe K,
    6. Steinmann J,
    7. Van der Meijden B,
    8. Bernardini F,
    9. Lederer A,
    10. Dias RL,
    11. Misson PE,
    12. Henze H,
    13. Zumbrunn J,
    14. Gombert FO,
    15. Obrecht D,
    16. Hunziker P,
    17. Schauer S,
    18. Ziegler U,
    19. Käch A,
    20. Eberl L,
    21. Riedel K,
    22. DeMarco SJ,
    23. Robinson JA
    . 2010. Peptidomimetic antibiotics target outer-membrane biogenesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Science 327:1010–1013. doi:10.1126/science.1182749.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Mensa B,
    2. Howell GL,
    3. Scott R,
    4. DeGrado WF
    . 2014. Comparative mechanistic studies of brilacidin, daptomycin, and the antimicrobial peptide LL16. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:5136–5145. doi:10.1128/AAC.02955-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Lyu Y,
    2. Yang X,
    3. Goswami S,
    4. Gorityala BK,
    5. Idowu T,
    6. Domalaon R,
    7. Zhanel GG,
    8. Shan A,
    9. Schweizer F
    . 2017. Amphiphilic tobramycin-lysine conjugates sensitize multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria to rifampicin and minocycline. J Med Chem 60:3684–3702. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01742.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. 38.↵
    1. Yang X,
    2. Goswami S,
    3. Gorityala BK,
    4. Domalaon R,
    5. Lyu Y,
    6. Kumar A,
    7. Zhanel GG,
    8. Schweizer F
    . 2017. A tobramycin vector enhances synergy and efficacy of efflux pump inhibitors against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. J Med Chem 60:3913–3932. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00156.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. 39.↵
    1. Domalaon R,
    2. Findlay B,
    3. Ogunsina M,
    4. Arthur G,
    5. Schweizer F
    . 2016. Ultrashort cationic lipopeptides and lipopeptoids: evaluation and mechanistic insights against epithelial cancer cells. Peptides 84:58–67. doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2016.07.007.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. 40.↵
    1. Domalaon R,
    2. Yang X,
    3. O'Neil J,
    4. Zhanel GG,
    5. Mookherjee N,
    6. Schweizer F
    . 2014. Structure-activity relationships in ultrashort cationic lipopeptides: the effects of amino acid ring constraint on antibacterial activity. Amino Acids 46:2517–2530. doi:10.1007/s00726-014-1806-z.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. 41.↵
    1. Domalaon R,
    2. Yang X,
    3. Lyu Y,
    4. Zhanel GG,
    5. Schweizer F
    . 2017. Polymyxin B3-tobramycin hybrids with pseudomonas aeruginosa-selective antibacterial activity and strong potentiation of rifampicin, minocycline, and vancomycin. ACS Infect Dis 3:941–954. doi:10.1021/acsinfecdis.7b00145.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. 42.↵
    1. Ogunsina M,
    2. Samadder P,
    3. Idowu T,
    4. Arthur G,
    5. Schweizer F
    . 2017. Replacing d-glucosamine with its l-enantiomer in glycosylated antitumor ether lipids (GAELs) retains cytotoxic effect against epithelial cancer cells and cancer stem cells. J Med Chem 60:2142–2147. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01773.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Short Proline-Rich Lipopeptide Potentiates Minocycline and Rifampin against Multidrug- and Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Ronald Domalaon, Yaroslav Sanchak, Linet Cherono Koskei, Yinfeng Lyu, George G. Zhanel, Gilbert Arthur, Frank Schweizer
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Mar 2018, 62 (4) e02374-17; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02374-17

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Short Proline-Rich Lipopeptide Potentiates Minocycline and Rifampin against Multidrug- and Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Short Proline-Rich Lipopeptide Potentiates Minocycline and Rifampin against Multidrug- and Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Ronald Domalaon, Yaroslav Sanchak, Linet Cherono Koskei, Yinfeng Lyu, George G. Zhanel, Gilbert Arthur, Frank Schweizer
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Mar 2018, 62 (4) e02374-17; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02374-17
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

proline-rich antimicrobial peptides
lipopeptides
adjuvant
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
minocycline
rifampin

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596