Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Experimental Therapeutics

Viability Screen of LOPAC1280 Reveals Phosphorylation Inhibitor Auranofin as a Potent Inhibitor of Blastocystis Subtype 1, 4, and 7 Isolates

John Anthony Yason, Kristine Anne Ru Ping Koh, Kevin Shyong Wei Tan
John Anthony Yason
aLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Parasitology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kristine Anne Ru Ping Koh
aLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Parasitology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin Shyong Wei Tan
aLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Parasitology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kevin Shyong Wei Tan
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00208-18
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    Screening of LOPAC1280 for the ability to decrease viability of Blastocystis. The cutoff was set at less than or equal to 20% viability relative fluorescence units.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    Relative fluorescence units (RFU) of Blastocystis cultures treated with compounds from LOPAC1280. Each compound was compared to Mz of the same isolate, and we determined whether the RFU was significantly lower. **, P > 0.01; ***, P > 0.001. DPI, diphenyleneiodonium chloride; AUR, auranofin; BIX, BIX 01294 trihydrochloride hydrate; Mz, metronidazole.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    Blastocystis cultures show different apoptotic profiles when treated with drugs from LOPAC1280 for 6 h. In general, ST4-WR1 showed the least proportion of viable cells compared to the other isolates after treatment. Diphenyleneiodonium chloride caused the lowest viability on ST4-WR1 cultures. ST7-B cultures are relatively resistant to the drugs. ST1-NUH9 and ST4-WR1 cultures had lower viability even without treatment, suggesting their fragility when exposed to aerobic conditions. DPI, diphenyleneiodonium chloride; AUR, auranofin; BIX, BIX 01294 trihydrochloride hydrate; Mz, metronidazole.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    Flow cytometry histograms of Hoechst-stained Blastocystis cells showed no changes in nucleic acid content when treated with selected compounds from LOPAC1280 except with BIX. The latter compound increased nucleic acid content in three Blastocystis isolates. DPI, diphenyleneiodonium chloride; AUR, auranofin; BIX, BIX 01294 trihydrochloride hydrate; Mz, metronidazole.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    Image gallery showing various forms of Blastocystis obtained and identified using an imaging flow cytometer. (A) Round and vacuolar cells are typically found in cultures. (B) Granular cells were identified as having high intensity values in the side-scatter channel. (C) The irregularly shaped cells have lower aspect-ratio values in the brightfield channel. (D and E) The EDF setting made it possible to perform spot counting in Hoechst-stained cells. These spots could indicate nuclear and other nucleic acid-containing structures in the cells.

  • FIG 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6

    Changes in phenotypic features of Blastocystis cultures treated with drug hits from LOPAC1280 for 24 h as determined using imaging flow cytometry. (A) The proportion of irregular-shaped cells increased after treatment. (B) There was an increase in the proportion of granular cells of Blastocystis upon treatment compared to untreated controls. (C) Most drugs caused Blastocystis to decrease in size. (D) Multinucleated cells determined by Hoechst staining increased in Blastocystis ST7-B isolates when treated with the drugs. Each isolate treated with the compounds was compared to untreated cultures of the same isolate. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. DPI, diphenyleneiodonium chloride; AUR, auranofin; BIX, BIX 01294 trihydrochloride hydrate; Mz, metronidazole.

  • FIG 7
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 7

    N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) reduced the effect of AU in Blastocystis. A resazurin-based assay showed lower metabolic activities in the three Blastocystis isolates when treated with AU, as indicated by the lower RFU emitted by Blastocystis cultures. There was a dose-dependent rescue when NAC was added to the cultures, as shown by significantly higher RFU values. ***, P < 0.001 (comparing the RFU values of each culture conditions with the culture treated with 10 μM auranofin [AU] of the same isolate).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • TABLE 1

    Drugs that inhibit growth of Blastocystis isolates and their target class

    DrugTarget classDecreased viability of:
    ST1-NUH9ST4-WR1ST7-B
    Emetine dihydrochloride hydrateApoptosis+
    NSC348884 hydrateApoptosis++
    1,10-Phenanthroline monohydrateBiochemistry+
    2,3-Dimethoxy-1,4-naphthoquinoneCell stress+
    (–)-Scopolamine hydrobromideCholinergic++
    IdarubicinDNA metabolism+
    Pregnenolone sulfate sodiumGABA+
    BIX 01294 trihydrochloride hydrateGene regulation+++
    Diphenhydramine hydrochlorideHistamine++
    Sanguinarine chlorideIon pump+
    TetrabenazineNeurotransmission+
    Diphenyleneiodonium chlorideNitric oxide+++
    JS-KNitric oxide+
    Ammonium pyrrolidinedithiocarbamateNitric oxide+
    BNTX maleate salt hydrateOpioids+
    AzathioprineP2 receptor+
    BTO-1Phosphorylation+
    AuranofinPhosphorylation+++
    SR 57227ASerotonin++
    (±)-Threo-1-phenyl-2-decanoylamino-3-morpholino-1-propanol hydrochlorideSphingolipid+
  • TABLE 2

    IC50s of drugs that inhibit growth of Blastocystis isolates

    DrugaMean IC50 (μg/ml) ± SDb
    ST1-NUH9ST4-WR1ST7-B
    Metronidazole5.26 ± 1.32 (30.7)5.74 ± 1.65 (33.5)31.5 ± 12 (184.3)
    DPI0.0972 ± 0.113 (0.309)0.105 ± 0.00226 (0.334)0.0759 ± 0.0397 (0.241)
    AU0.0622 ± 0.00314 (0.0917)0.122 ± 0.00735 (0.180)0.113 ± 0.0424 (0.166)
    BIX0.467 ± 0.251 (0.778)0.648 ± 0.158 (1.08)1.39 ± 0.150 (2.32)
    • ↵a DPI, diphenyleneiodonium chloride; AU, auranofin; BIX, BIX 01294 trihydrochloride hydrate.

    • ↵b The micromolar concentration is indicated in parentheses.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental material

    • Supplemental file 1 -

      Fig. S1 and S2

      PDF, 230K

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Viability Screen of LOPAC1280 Reveals Phosphorylation Inhibitor Auranofin as a Potent Inhibitor of Blastocystis Subtype 1, 4, and 7 Isolates
John Anthony Yason, Kristine Anne Ru Ping Koh, Kevin Shyong Wei Tan
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jul 2018, 62 (8) e00208-18; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00208-18

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Viability Screen of LOPAC1280 Reveals Phosphorylation Inhibitor Auranofin as a Potent Inhibitor of Blastocystis Subtype 1, 4, and 7 Isolates
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Viability Screen of LOPAC1280 Reveals Phosphorylation Inhibitor Auranofin as a Potent Inhibitor of Blastocystis Subtype 1, 4, and 7 Isolates
John Anthony Yason, Kristine Anne Ru Ping Koh, Kevin Shyong Wei Tan
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jul 2018, 62 (8) e00208-18; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00208-18
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

blastocystis
LOPAC
apoptosis
auranofin
chemotherapy
drug screening
subtype

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596