Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Clinical Therapeutics

Adjuvant β-Lactam Therapy Combined with Vancomycin for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Does β-Lactam Class Matter?

Thomas J. Dilworth, Anthony M. Casapao, Omar M. Ibrahim, David M. Jacobs, Dana R. Bowers, Nicholas D. Beyda, Renee-Claude Mercier
Thomas J. Dilworth
aAurora Health Care, Department of Pharmacy Services, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony M. Casapao
bUniversity of Florida College of Pharmacy, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Omar M. Ibrahim
cIndependent Researcher, Gainesville, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David M. Jacobs
dUniversity at Buffalo School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Buffalo, New York, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David M. Jacobs
Dana R. Bowers
eWashington State University College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Yakima, Washington, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas D. Beyda
fUniversity of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Renee-Claude Mercier
gUniversity of New Mexico College of Pharmacy, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02211-18
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

We analyzed the impact of vancomycin (VAN) combined with adjuvant β-lactam therapy (Combo) on persistent (≥5 days) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia versus VAN alone by using pooled data from two previously published observational studies (n = 156). Combo was inversely associated with persistent bacteremia (adjusted odds ratio, 0.460; 95% confidence interval, 0.229 to 0.923). Acute kidney injury was more common with Combo than with VAN (18.9% and 7.6%, respectively; P = 0.062).

INTRODUCTION

Treatment with vancomycin (VAN) combined with a β-lactam (Combo) expedites methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia clearance compared with VAN alone (1–5). However, the impact of Combo on persistent MRSA bacteremia, using a contemporary definition of ≥5 days, is not well studied (6). There is also no consensus on which β-lactam(s) should be combined with VAN. We sought to assess persistent bacteremia rates among adults who received treatment with Combo or VAN alone and the impact of β-lactam class on persistent bacteremia.

(This work was presented at ID Week, 5 October 2018, San Francisco, CA.)

This was a retrospective analysis of pooled data from two previously published observational studies of adult patients with MRSA bacteremia in the United States (1, 2). The first was a single-center retrospective study of patients from January 2005 to December 2012 (1). The second was a multicenter retrospective study of patients from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2014 (2). Patient cohorts in the two component studies were entirely distinct. Not all patients from the previous studies were included in the current study because the studies had different inclusion criteria. All patients included in the current study from the two previous studies had to meet the following criteria for study inclusion. All patients received VAN intravenously for ≥72 h. The Combo group received an intravenous β-lactam for ≥48 h with VAN, started within 24 h of VAN alone; the remaining patients comprised the VAN group. The primary outcome was persistent bacteremia (≥5 days of MRSA bacteremia). The impact of β-lactam class on persistent bacteremia was assessed. Acute kidney injury (AKI) (serum creatinine increase from baseline by 0.5 mg/dl or 50%) was also assessed throughout patient exposure to antibiotic therapy while in the hospital (7). Patient characteristics, severity of illness (PITT bacteremia score), infection-related characteristics, and clinical outcomes were recorded (8). Bacteremia source was categorized as primary endovascular, secondary, or catheter related (9). Endocarditis was defined using modified Duke criteria (10).

We determined the association between treatment assignment and persistent bacteremia in the entire pooled study population. Then we assessed the impact of β-lactam class (penicillin, cephalosporin, and carbapenem) on persistent bacteremia. The same analyses were repeated only for those who received Combo. Nomenclature from both databases was harmonized to facilitate data analysis. Univariable analyses were used to compare patients in the VAN and Combo groups and patients with and without persistent bacteremia. Multivariable analyses of factors associated with persistent bacteremia were performed using forward, stepwise multiple logistic regression. The criterion for model entry was α = .20, whereas the criterion for remaining in the model was significance at α ≤ .05. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was utilized to evaluate goodness of fit. SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used for all analyses.

In total, 156 of the 177 potential patients (88.1%) were included (VAN, n = 66; Combo, n = 90). Patients were excluded for receiving β-lactam therapy for <48 h (n = 9), β-lactam therapy starting >24 h after VAN initiation (n = 9), >1 β-lactam (n = 2), and enteral β-lactam therapy (n = 1). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) duration of β-lactam therapy in the Combo group was 5 days (3 to 8 days). The groups were similar (Table 1), except that patients in the Combo group had a higher VAN exposure (initial median [IQR] trough level, 17.8 [13.9 to 23.6] versus 15.7 [11.3 to 20.6] mg/liter; P = 0.039). Persistent bacteremia was less common with Combo (26.7% versus 43.9%; P = 0.027). In a multivariable model, use of Combo was inversely associated with persistent bacteremia (adjusted odds ratio, 0.423; 95% confidence interval, 0.212 to 0.843). No other predictor variables were independently associated with persistent bacteremia. AKI was more common with the Combo treatment (18.9% versus 7.6%; P = 0.062). The rates of persistent bacteremia and AKI by β-lactam class are shown in Table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Treatment assignment and persistent bacteremia, univariable analyses

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Rates of persistent bacteremia and acute kidney injury by β-lactam class

These results suggest that Combo reduces the likelihood of persistent bacteremia when using the contemporary definition of ≥5 days (6). This is important because the treatment paradigm for MRSA bacteremia is changing toward a focus on antibiotic therapy escalation in response to persistence earlier in the disease course (6). Previous studies have used a 7-day persistent bacteremia definition and/or have analyzed the impact of Combo on composite microbiological and clinical outcomes showing favorable results with Combo (1–5). Truong et al. (4) recently evaluated Combo compared with VAN alone using a composite endpoint that included persistent bacteremia (>5 days) and found no difference in persistent bacteremia between groups. Davis et al. (3) found that Combo reduced the proportion of patients with positive blood cultures at day 3 compared with VAN alone. Combo has yet to show an impact on clinical outcomes beyond those included as part of a composite endpoint, with the notable exception of results from a study that used the combination of daptomycin plus ceftaroline as salvage therapy (11). However, the ongoing CAMERA-2 trial should provide more data on this important issue (12). Combo may reduce the need to escalate antibiotic therapy due to persistent bacteremia, which may prevent the overuse of last-line agents such as daptomycin and ceftaroline. However, the rate of AKI was higher with Combo than with VAN alone. Although our study was not designed to determine the impact of Combo on AKI, this finding is notable. The initial median VAN trough level was higher in the Combo group. Higher VAN exposure in Combo may be a consequence of AKI rather than a cause of AKI. Clinicians using adjuvant β-lactam therapy should be cognizant of the potential AKI risk with Combo. Most patients on Combo therapy (60%) received piperacillin-tazobactam, which, in combination with VAN, can increase the likelihood of AKI (13). It is prudent to avoid piperacillin-tazobactam use with Combo because it may be associated with nephrotoxicity. However, we cannot endorse use of other β-lactams for Combo based on our data alone. Additional, prospective clinical trial data are needed to determine which β-lactams may be safely used with VAN as Combo. The lack of persistent bacteremia among the small subgroup of patients receiving adjuvant carbapenem therapy (n = 8) is interesting but difficult to interpret. The impact of adjuvant β-lactam class on persistent bacteremia likely requires additional study with larger sample sizes.

We included a number of important data elements in this study, but the two data sets were not identical, preventing the use of certain variables (e.g., strain characteristics and more sensitive assessments of AKI). However, multiple patient and treatment-level data were included in this analysis, and patients in the Combo and VAN groups were well matched. Our study is limited by its retrospective nature and small sample size. We were unable to draw strong conclusions regarding the impact of β-lactam class used in Combo on persistent bacteremia or AKI. In conclusion, Combo reduced the likelihood of persistent bacteremia but was associated with a statistically nonsignificant trend toward a higher rate of AKI. Clinically, Combo may reduce persistent bacteremia rates and potentially prevent overuse of salvage antibiotic therapy. β-Lactam choice for Combo warrants further investigation.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 19 October 2018.
    • Returned for modification 30 November 2018.
    • Accepted 3 January 2019.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 7 January 2019.
  • Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Dilworth TJ,
    2. Ibrahim O,
    3. Hall P,
    4. Sliwinski J,
    5. Walraven C,
    6. Mercier RC
    . 2014. β-Lactams enhance vancomycin activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia compared to vancomycin alone. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:102–109. doi:10.1128/AAC.01204-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Casapao AM,
    2. Jacobs DM,
    3. Bowers DR,
    4. Beyda ND,
    5. Dilworth TJ
    . 2017. Early administration of adjuvant β-lactam therapy in combination with vancomycin among patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection: a retrospective, multicenter analysis. Pharmacotherapy 37:1347–1356. doi:10.1002/phar.2034.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Davis JS,
    2. Sud A,
    3. O'Sullivan MVN,
    4. Robinson JO,
    5. Ferguson PE,
    6. Foo H,
    7. van Hal SJ,
    8. Ralph AP,
    9. Howden BP,
    10. Binks PM,
    11. Kirby A,
    12. Tong SYC
    . 2016. Combination of vancomycin and b-lactam therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a pilot multicenter randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis 62:173–180. doi:10.1093/cid/civ808.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Truong J,
    2. Veillette JJ,
    3. Forland SC
    . 2018. Outcomes of vancomycin plus a β-lactam versus vancomycin only for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e01554-17. doi:10.1128/AAC.01554-17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Trinh TD,
    2. Zasowski EJ,
    3. Lagnf AM,
    4. Bhatia S,
    5. Dahr S,
    6. Mynatt R,
    7. Pogue JM,
    8. Rybak MJ
    . 2017. Combination vancomycin/cefazolin (VAN/CFZ) for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSI), abstr 777. Abstr ID Week, 5 October 2017, San Diego, CA.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kullar R,
    2. McKinnell JA,
    3. Sakoulas G
    . 2014. Avoiding the perfect storm: the biologic and clinical case for reevaluating the 7-day expectation for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia before switching therapy. Clin Infect Dis 59:1455–1461. doi:10.1093/cid/ciu583.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Rybak M,
    2. Lomaestro B,
    3. Rotschafer JC,
    4. Moellering R, Jr,
    5. Craig W,
    6. Billeter M,
    7. Dalovisio JR,
    8. Levine DP
    . 2009. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm 66:82–98. doi:10.2146/ajhp080434.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Chow JW,
    2. Fine MJ,
    3. Shlaes DM,
    4. Quinn JP,
    5. Hooper DC,
    6. Johnson MP,
    7. Ramphal R,
    8. Wagener MM,
    9. Miyashiro DK,
    10. Yu VL
    . 1991. Enterobacter bacteremia: clinical features and emergence of antibiotic resistance during therapy. Ann Intern Med 115:585–590.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Rose WE,
    2. Shukla SK,
    3. BerTi AD,
    4. Hayney MS,
    5. Henriquez KM,
    6. Ranzoni A,
    7. Cooper MA,
    8. Proctor RA,
    9. Nizet V,
    10. Sakoulas G
    . 2017. Increased endovascular Staphylococcus aureus inoculum is the link between elevated serum interleukin 10 concentrations and mortality in patients with bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 64:1406–1412. doi:10.1093/cid/cix157.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Li JS,
    2. Sexton DJ,
    3. Mick N,
    4. Nettles R,
    5. Fowler VG, Jr,
    6. Ryan T,
    7. Bashore T,
    8. Corey GR
    . 2000. Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis 30:633–638. doi:10.1086/313753.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Rose WE,
    2. McCreary EK,
    3. Schulz LT,
    4. Ouellette K,
    5. Vasina L,
    6. Geriak M,
    7. Sakoulas G
    . 2017. Reduced mortality of patients receiving daptomycin plus ceftaroline compared to standard monotherapy in MRSA bacteraemia: a matched case-control study, poster P2130. Abstr 27th Eur Congr Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, Vienna, Austria.
  12. 12.↵
    1. Tong SY,
    2. Nelson J,
    3. Paterson DL,
    4. Fowler VG, Jr,
    5. Howden BP,
    6. Cheng AC,
    7. Chatfield M,
    8. Lipman J,
    9. Van Hal S,
    10. O'Sullivan M,
    11. Robinson JO,
    12. Yahav D,
    13. Lye D,
    14. Davis JS
    . 2016. CAMERA2 - combination antibiotic therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 17:170. doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1295-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    1. Luther MK,
    2. Timbrook TT,
    3. Caffrey AR,
    4. Dosa D,
    5. Lodise TP,
    6. LaPlante KL
    . 2018. Vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam and acute kidney injury in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 46:12–20. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002769.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Adjuvant β-Lactam Therapy Combined with Vancomycin for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Does β-Lactam Class Matter?
Thomas J. Dilworth, Anthony M. Casapao, Omar M. Ibrahim, David M. Jacobs, Dana R. Bowers, Nicholas D. Beyda, Renee-Claude Mercier
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Feb 2019, 63 (3) e02211-18; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02211-18

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Adjuvant β-Lactam Therapy Combined with Vancomycin for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Does β-Lactam Class Matter?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Adjuvant β-Lactam Therapy Combined with Vancomycin for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Does β-Lactam Class Matter?
Thomas J. Dilworth, Anthony M. Casapao, Omar M. Ibrahim, David M. Jacobs, Dana R. Bowers, Nicholas D. Beyda, Renee-Claude Mercier
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Feb 2019, 63 (3) e02211-18; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02211-18
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

bacteremia
β-lactam
combination therapy
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
vancomycin

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596