Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Editor's Pick Susceptibility

Bicarbonate Resensitization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus to β-Lactam Antibiotics

Selvi C. Ersoy, Wessam Abdelhady, Liang Li, Henry F. Chambers, Yan Q. Xiong, Arnold S. Bayer
Selvi C. Ersoy
aLos Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wessam Abdelhady
aLos Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liang Li
aLos Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henry F. Chambers
cDivision of Infectious Diseases, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Department of Medicine, San Francisco School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yan Q. Xiong
aLos Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, California, USA
bGeffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arnold S. Bayer
aLos Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, California, USA
bGeffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00496-19
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Endovascular infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are a major health care concern, especially infective endocarditis (IE). Standard antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) defines most MRSA strains as “resistant” to β-lactams, often leading to the use of costly and/or toxic treatment regimens. In this investigation, five prototype MRSA strains, representing the range of genotypes in current clinical circulation, were studied. We identified two distinct MRSA phenotypes upon AST using standard media, with or without sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) supplementation: one highly susceptible to the antistaphylococcal β-lactams oxacillin and cefazolin (NaHCO3 responsive) and one resistant to such agents (NaHCO3 nonresponsive). These phenotypes accurately predicted clearance profiles of MRSA from target tissues in experimental MRSA IE treated with each β-lactam. Mechanistically, NaHCO3 reduced the expression of two key genes involved in the MRSA phenotype, mecA and sarA, leading to decreased production of penicillin-binding protein 2a (that mediates methicillin resistance), in NaHCO3-responsive (but not in NaHCO3-nonresponsive) strains. Moreover, both cefazolin and oxacillin synergistically killed NaHCO3-responsive strains in the presence of the host defense antimicrobial peptide (LL-37) in NaHCO3-supplemented media. These findings suggest that AST of MRSA strains in NaHCO3-containing media may potentially identify infections caused by NaHCO3-responsive strains that are appropriate for β-lactam therapy.

INTRODUCTION

Staphylococcus aureus is a major bloodstream pathogen in both community-acquired and nosocomially acquired scenarios and is the leading cause of infective endocarditis (IE) in the industrialized world (1). Compounding the danger of S. aureus bloodstream infections (BSIs) is the steady rise of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains in many geographic regions in the United States (2). MRSA is a serious infectious threat, causing more than 15,000 deaths in the United States each year (3).

MRSA have high MICs that are above Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) resistance breakpoints for most conventional β-lactam antibiotics, such as oxacillin, on standard antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) media. This finding implies a lack of efficacy of these agents in treating MRSA infections, as confirmed in selected experimental IE studies (4–6). Treatment options for MRSA are generally limited to costlier and/or more toxic drugs, such as vancomycin, daptomycin, and lipoglycopeptides, and fifth-generation cephalosporins, such as ceftaroline (7–9). In addition, great expense and effort have gone into development of such newer anti-MRSA drugs (10, 11).

AST protocols for MRSA have been standardized by the CLSI and involve growth of bacterial samples in 2% NaCl cation-supplemented, nutrient-rich Mueller-Hinton broth (CA-MHB) (12, 13). However, MHB does not accurately represent the host milieu, and MICs observed in this medium are unlikely to mirror those exhibited by MRSA within specific host microenvironments. Although research efforts have been made to effectively model the host microenvironment in vitro or ex vivo (e.g., using simulated endocardial vegetations [SEVs]) (14, 15), these models are not suitable for large-scale AST in clinical laboratories.

Recently, several groups have attempted to improve standardized AST by altering growth conditions to better reflect the host environment. For example, AST of intracellular bacteria, such as Salmonella, in media that models the host phagolysosome can better predict treatment outcomes in murine bacteremia models (16, 17). Growth of bacteria in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM) (but not in standard AST media) can stimulate expression of virulence factors typically exhibited in vivo (18, 19). These observations led to the discovery that AST of extracellular bacteria performed in such cell culture medium (including DMEM and RPMI 1640) was a better predictor of in vivo treatment outcomes than standard AST media for Acinetobacter and some staphylococci (17, 20). Of note, Dorschner et al. identified the role of physiological concentrations of NaHCO3 in facilitating the in vitro killing of Escherichia coli and MRSA by host antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) (21). The carbonate molecule was capable of altering expression of a number of key regulatory genes in E. coli, including the homolog of the MRSA stress response regulator, sigma factor B (sigB). Finally, our lab has recently confirmed the key role of NaHCO3 supplementation in rendering a range of bacterial pathogens, including MRSA, as more susceptible in vitro to multiple antibiotics, including β-lactams (17). The predictive role of this “NaHCO3-responsive” phenotype, vis-à-vis salutary outcomes to β-lactam therapy, was corroborated in a murine bacteremia model (17).

In the present study, we focused on the activity of two β-lactam agents routinely used for treating methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) infections against five well-characterized prototype MRSA strains, in the presence or absence of NaHCO3-supplemented standard media. Using this modified AST schema, we demonstrate that NaHCO3 supplementation increased the in vitro susceptibility of selected MRSA strains to both cefazolin and oxacillin (i.e., NaHCO3-responsive MRSA). Although these drugs are typically not recommended for the treatment of MRSA (22), we observed that they can be highly effective in treating such NaHCO3-responsive MRSA strains in a rabbit model of IE. In contrast, MRSA strains that were NaHCO3 nonresponsive in vitro were recalcitrant to such β-lactam therapy in vivo.

If verified in larger MRSA screening studies, these novel findings may potentially prompt modifications of AST for MRSA; this, in turn, could potentially guide new treatment algorithms for selected MRSA infections with β-lactam agents such as cefazolin and antistaphylococcal penicillins. Finally, mechanistically, NaHCO3 responsiveness correlated with the capacity of this molecule to suppress at least two key regulatory pathways intimately involved in the MRSA phenotype: mecA-PBP2a and sarA (5, 23, 24).

RESULTS

Effect of NaHCO3 on β-lactam susceptibility in vitro.MIC values obtained in standard CA-MHB for the five study strains were generally within 2-fold of those obtained in CA-MHB plus 100 mM Tris (CA-MHB-Tris; see Table S1 in the supplemental material). MRSA strains 11/11 (USA300 genotype) and MW2 (USA400 genotype) displayed a substantial decrease in MICs to cefazolin and oxacillin when grown in media containing 44 mM NaHCO3 (Table 1). Strain MRSA 11/11 also displayed a decrease in MICs to cefazolin and oxacillin, albeit less pronounced, when exposed to a more physiologically relevant concentration of NaHCO3 (25 mM). In contrast, β-lactam MICs for three other prototype MRSA strains, COL (USA100 genotype), BMC1001 (USA500 genotype), and 300-111 (CC8, spa type 4, Iberian clone) were unaffected by exposure to NaHCO3 at either concentration (Table 1). Based on these two distinct phenotypes, we termed the two strains above, whose β-lactam MICs were substantially reduced by NaHCO3, “responsive,” while we termed the other three strains, whose β-lactam MICs were unaffected by NaHCO3, “nonresponsive.”

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

MICs of β-lactam antibiotics against methicillin-resistant S. aureus grown in media with and without NaHCO3a

In addition, several recent investigations have promoted the use of the tissue culture medium, RPMI 1640, as a more physiologic, host-mimicking media and a better predictor of in vivo susceptibility to various antimicrobials than standard growth media, especially for Gram-negative bacteria (20, 25). As opposed to our NaHCO3 assays, we found that MICs to both β-lactams were decreased in RPMI 1640 for all five of our study strains, although the effect was somewhat less substantive for strain COL (Table 1).

To evaluate whether NaHCO3 sensitization of MRSA to β-lactams was merely a “weak acid” effect, we investigated the impact of salicylic acid exposure on β-lactam MICs among four of our study strains. Exposure of these MRSA strains to 25 and 50 μg/ml salicylic acid, concentrations that are physiologically achievable during aspirin therapy (26), had no effect on the β-lactam MICs in any strain tested (Table S1). These data are in accord with those of Farha et al. using two other weak acid molecules, acetate and borate (27). Taken together, this finding indicates that β-lactam resensitization of some MRSA in the presence of NaHCO3 is not the result of a generalized weak acid effect.

To further quantify the effect of NaHCO3 on MRSA β-lactam susceptibility profiles, a time-kill assay was conducted using log-phase responsive MRSA 11/11 or nonresponsive COL cells. As predicted by the MIC data, MRSA 11/11 displayed significantly greater killing when exposed to cefazolin and oxacillin in NaHCO3-containing media compared to NaHCO3-free media (Fig. 1A). After a 24 h of incubation, a ≥4-log10 CFU/ml reduction in counts was observed for MRSA 11/11 exposed to 8 μg/ml cefazolin or 15 μg/ml oxacillin in NaHCO3-containing versus NaHCO3-free media. These latter β-lactam concentrations represent sublethal concentrations as determined in multiple pilot time-kill studies carried out in NaHCO3-free media. In contrast, strain COL displayed a minimal reduction in counts when grown in NaHCO3-containing versus NaHCO3-free media under all testing conditions (Fig. 1B). Similar differential time-kill results were obtained for the NaHCO3-responsive strain MW2 and the NaHCO3-nonresponsive strain BMC1001 (Fig. S1). Interestingly, the nonresponsive strain 300-111, which has a relatively low baseline level of resistance to cefazolin and oxacillin, displayed an intermediate level of killing when exposed to 8 μg/ml cefazolin or 15 μg/ml oxacillin in NaHCO3-containing versus NaHCO3-free media (Fig. S1).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Time-kill analysis of log-phase cells grown in media with or without NaHCO3 . (A) MRSA 11/11; (B) COL. Growth in CA-MHB-Tris (closed symbols) or in CA-MHB-Tris plus 44 mM NaHCO3 (open symbols) with no drug (circles), 8 μg/ml cefazolin (triangles), 32 μg/ml cefazolin (diamonds), or 15 μg/ml oxacillin (squares) is indicated. The data are means of two independent runs performed in triplicate for each condition ± the SD. Statistical comparisons were made using a Kruskal-Wallis single-factor ANOVA and the post hoc pairwise Mann-Whitney U test. Asterisks represent comparisons (**, P < 0.01) at the 24-h time point of MRSA 11/11 exposed to 8 μg/ml cefazolin in CA-MHB-Tris versus CA-MHB-Tris plus 44 mM NaHCO3 and 15 μg/ml oxacillin in CA-MHB-Tris plus 2% NaCl versus CA-MHB-Tris plus 2% NaCl plus 44 mM NaHCO3.

Supplementation with 44 mM NaHCO3 had only a modest effect on 24-h growth kinetics for the five study strains (Fig. S2). With the exception of COL and 300-111, stationary-phase cell counts at 24 h were not significantly different between media with versus without 44 mM NaHCO3 for any strain tested.

Population analyses in NaHCO3-containing media.Population analysis profiles (PAPs) are a standard quantitative in vitro assessment of the proportions of antibiotic-resistant subpopulations within a given strain versus specific antibiotics (28). MRSA strains contain a variable proportion of highly β-lactam-resistant subpopulations. For example, homogeneously resistant (homoresistant) strains usually contain a high percentage (e.g., >10%) of such subpopulations, whereas heterogeneously resistant (heteroresistant) strains generally contain a lower percentage (e.g., <0.01%) of resistant subpopulations.

To determine the effect of NaHCO3 on β-lactam-resistant subpopulations, PAPs for cefazolin were determined for our five prototype MRSA strains in NaHCO3-containing versus NaHCO3-free agar. NaHCO3-responsive strains MRSA 11/11 and MW2 displayed heteroresistant PAP phenotypes on NaHCO3-free agar, whereas NaHCO3-nonresponsive strains COL, BMC1001, and 300-111 each displayed a more homoresistant PAP phenotype (Fig. 2A). To better characterize β-lactam heteroresistant versus homoresistant phenotypes, using COL as our benchmark homoresistant strain, we calculated the area under the PAP curve (AUC) ratios for MRSA 11/11, MW2, BMC1001, and 300-111 with respect to the COL AUC. AUC ratios of NaHCO3-responsive strains were significantly lower in the presence of NaHCO3 (compare Fig. 2A to B). Although NaHCO3 did have a slight repressive effect on the resistant subpopulation of 300-111, the AUC for this strain in 44 mM NaHCO3 was significantly greater than both MRSA 11/11 and MW2. NaHCO3 had no effect on the AUC ratio of BMC1001 or the proportion of highly resistant COL or BMC1001 cells (Fig. 2B). Exposure to oxacillin, with or without NaHCO3, yielded similar results to cefazolin, although the magnitude of suppression of the highly resistant subpopulations of the two NaHCO3-responsive strains (MRSA 11/11 and MW2) was less than that seen with cefazolin, and the differences were not statistically significant (data not shown).

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Population analysis of cells grown in media with or without NaHCO3. (A) Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) supplemented with Tris (closed symbols); (B) MHA supplemented with Tris and 44 mM NaHCO3 (open symbols). Data for strains MRSA 11/11 (solid black line), MW2 (dashed black line), 300-111 (dotted gray line), COL (solid gray line), and BMC1001 (dashed gray line) are shown. CFZ, cefazolin. Area under the curve (AUC) ratios were compared to COL as a homoresistant reference strain. The data are means of two independent runs performed in triplicate for each condition ± the SD. Statistical comparisons were made using a Kruskal-Wallis single-factor ANOVA and the post hoc pairwise Mann-Whitney U test. MRSA 11/11, MW2, and 300-111 AUC in media containing 44 mM NaHCO3 were significantly reduced compared to strains in media without NaHCO3 (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001); the AUC ratio of 300-111 in media containing 44 mM NaHCO3 is significantly greater than that of MRSA 11/11 and MW2 (*, P < 0.05).

Rabbit IE treatment outcomes with β-lactams.To verify the in vivo translatability of the NaHCO3 responsivity phenotypes determined in vitro, a rabbit model of aortic valve IE, treated with the two study β-lactams, was used. The β-lactam treatment regimens were based on (i) published protocols for experimental IE therapy that are capable of clearing MSSA strains from target tissues (5, 29), (ii) human-mimicking pharmacokinetic profiles (5, 29) (Table S2), and (iii) our own pilot treatment outcome studies of experimental MSSA IE with these regimens (Fig. S4). As predicted by in vitro MICs determined in NaHCO3-containing media, both NaHCO3-responsive strains were highly susceptible to β-lactam therapy in vivo to levels not dissimilar from that seen with the MSSA control strain ATCC 25923 (Fig. 3A; see also Fig. S4 in the supplemental material). Thus, significant clearance of MRSA 11/11 and MW2 was observed in all target tissues sampled after 4 days of either cefazolin or oxacillin therapy. Of note, sterilization of multiple target tissues was seen in >70% of organ cultures from animals infected with the two NaHCO3-responsive when treated with cefazolin; in contrast, oxacillin therapy did not sterilize any target tissues despite significant reductions in MRSA counts in IE caused by these latter strains (data not shown). In contrast, β-lactam therapy was ineffective in reducing bacterial counts in the target tissues of rabbits infected with two NaHCO3-nonresponsive strains, COL or BMC1001 (Fig. 3B). The in vitro NaHCO3-nonresponsive strain, 300-111, displayed a significant reduction in bacterial counts in all target tissues following cefazolin and oxacillin treatment; however, the magnitude of killing was significantly less than that observed in either NaHCO3-responsive strain (Fig. 3B). Interestingly, the MICs determined in CA-MHB-Tris containing 44 mM NaHCO3 were better predictors of treatment outcomes for all five strains than were the MICs determined in RPMI 1640, based roughly on previously established 2014 CLSI breakpoints (cefazolin breakpoints are no longer employed in the current 2018 CLSI guidelines [13, 30]: S ≤ 8 μg/ml, I = 16 μg/ml, R ≥ 32 μg/ml) and current oxacillin breakpoints (S ≤ 2 μg/ml, R ≥ 4 μg/ml [31]).

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Treatment outcomes of rabbits with infective endocarditis treated with β-lactams. (A) NaHCO3-responsive strains; (B) NaHCO3-nonresponsive strains. All rabbits were treated with 100 mg/kg of cefazolin (CFZ) or oxacillin (OX), t.i.d., intramuscularly, for 4 days. Data for strains MRSA 11/11 (control, n = 6; CFZ, n = 8; OX, n = 6), MW2 (control, n = 7; CFZ, n = 6; OX, n = 7), COL (control, n = 6; CFZ, n = 7; OX, n = 6), BMC1001 (control, n = 6; CFZ, n = 7; OX, n = 7), and 300-111 (control, n = 10; CFZ, n = 4; OX, n = 6) are shown. The data presented indicate the mean tissue CFU/g for each treatment group ± the SD. Statistical comparisons were made using a Kruskal-Wallis single-factor ANOVA and the post hoc pairwise Mann-Whitney U test (**, P < 0.01). Strain 300-111 had significantly greater cell counts in all target tissues following cefazolin and oxacillin therapy compared to both MRSA 11/11 and MW2 (*, P < 0.05).

It was important to ensure that β-lactam therapy in experimental IE caused by the NaHCO3-responsive strains did not select for highly β-lactam-resistant subpopulations within target tissues after β-lactam therapy. Thus, at the time of sacrifice, homogenates from these organs were parallel plated onto tryptic soy agar (TSA) containing 64 μg/ml of either cefazolin or oxacillin in animals treated with these respective agents. No such high-level β-lactam-resistant colonies were detected for either MRSA 11/11-infected or MW2-infected animals after therapy with either of the two β-lactam agents (data not shown).

To investigate whether exposure to NaHCO3 itself might influence the tissue burdens of NaHCO3-responsive strains during induction of infection, in a separate study, MRSA 11/11 was grown overnight in CA-MHB-Tris containing 25 or 44 mM NaHCO3 prior to infection of aortic valve-catheterized animals. At 24 h postinfection, there were no significant differences in target tissue MRSA counts between rabbits infected with MRSA 11/11 grown in NaHCO3-free CA-MHB-Tris versus 25 or 44 mM NaHCO3-containing CA-MHB-Tris (Fig. S3B). This confirmed that bicarbonate preexposure itself did not hinder the induction and early progression phases of infection in experimental IE caused by NaHCO3-responsive strains.

NaHCO3 levels in experimental IE.To put our in vivo outcomes in experimental IE into perspective, we measured [HCO3–] levels in both infected and uninfected rabbits. Quantification of [HCO3–] concentrations in the blood of animals with IE versus uninfected controls revealed that blood [HCO3–] levels remained relatively constant in the range of 20 to 25 mM (Fig. S3C). The fact that the maximal in vitro impact of NaHCO3 supplementation of standard media was seen at 44 mM versus 25 mM suggested that other factors are likely in play in vivo which contribute to NaHCO3 responsivity in experimental IE (e.g., host immune molecules and/or cells).

LL-37 synergy with β-lactams in the presence of physiological concentrations of NaHCO3.We hypothesized that the high-level killing exhibited by β-lactams in vivo against the two NaHCO3-responsive strains in the presence of physiologic concentrations of NaHCO3 (ca. 20 to 25 mM) may be due to a synergistic effect between β-lactams and host immune factors, particularly host defense peptides. To further investigate this, we performed a cell survival assay utilizing sublethal concentrations of the human cathelicidin, LL-37, in combination with cefazolin or oxacillin, in a minimal medium containing 25 mM NaHCO3. Strains were exposed to LL-37 and the β-lactams alone or in combination in the presence of this physiological concentration of NaHCO3.

When exposed to a combination of LL-37 and either cefazolin or oxacillin, both NaHCO3-responsive strains displayed significantly lower MRSA survivals compared to either β-lactam agent alone (Fig. 4A and B). In contrast, the NaHCO3-nonresponsive strain, COL, did not display synergistic killing when exposed to a combination of LL-37 plus either cefazolin or oxacillin (Fig. 4C), consistent with the results seen in the IE model. These data indicate that, although higher concentrations of NaHCO3 (44 mM) are required in vitro to disclose “responsiveness” among MRSA strains, host defense and/or other serum factors may foster such responsivity in vivo in combination with more physiologic NaHCO3 levels (ca. 20 to 25 mM).

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

LL-37 synergy with β-lactams in media containing 25 mM NaHCO3. (A) MRSA 11/11 (NaHCO3 responder); (B) MW2 (NaHCO3 responder); (C) COL (NaHCO3 nonresponder). CFZ, cefazolin; OX, oxacillin. Bars: no drug, hatched; LL-37 only, white; CFZ or OX, black; CFZ or OX plus LL-37, gray. MRSA 11/11 was exposed to 2.5 μg/ml LL-37 and 0.03125 μg/ml CFZ or OX. MW2 and COL were exposed to 5 μg/ml LL-37 and 0.0625 μg/ml CFZ or OX. The percent survival was calculated after 4 h of exposure to antimicrobials in NaHCO3-free DMEM supplemented with 25 mM NaHCO3. The data are means of three independent runs performed in triplicate for each condition ± the SD. Statistical comparisons were made using a Kruskal-Wallis single-factor ANOVA and the post hoc pairwise Mann-Whitney U test (**, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).

Mechanisms of NaHCO3-mediated β-lactam resensitization of MRSA: mecA and sarA expression.To understand the potential genetic basis for altered β-lactam susceptibility in selected MRSA strains in NaHCO3-containing media, we investigated the influence of NaHCO3 on mecA and sarA gene expression. The mecA locus encodes penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a) that confers β-lactam resistance in MRSA strains (24). In addition, recent studies have demonstrated that the global virulence gene regulator, sarA, can also modulate β-lactam resistance via both mecA-dependent and mecA-independent mechanisms (23). To investigate the influence of NaHCO3 exposure on mecA and sarA gene expression, RNA was extracted from cells grown in media with and without NaHCO3 in the absence or presence of 1/2 MIC of oxacillin (to maximally induce mecA expression). The quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses revealed that mecA and sarA gene expression were each significantly repressed in the two NaHCO3-responsive strains under both these mecA-noninducing and -inducing conditions (Fig. 5A and B). In contrast, mecA gene expression was not repressible in any NaHCO3-nonresponsive strain (Fig. 5A and B). The expression of sarA was only slightly repressed in COL in NaHCO3-supplemented media with oxacillin induction but was nonrepressible in media without oxacillin induction (Fig. 5A and B). The expression of sarA was also not repressible in the other NaHCO3-nonresponsive strains, BMC1001 and 300-111 (Fig. 5A and B).

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

mecA and sarA expression in NaHCO3-responsive and NaHCO3-nonresponsive strains. (A) qRT-PCR analysis of mecA and sarA gene expression in stationary-phase cells grown in CA-MHB-Tris with or without NaHCO3. (B) qRT-PCR analysis of mecA and sarA gene expression in stationary-phase cells grown in CA-MHB-Tris plus 2% NaCl with or without NaHCO3 with 1/2 MIC of oxacillin. Gene expression levels are normalized to the housekeeping gene gyrB. Gene expression values are normalized to CA-MHB-Tris for each strain. All data are derived from two independent biological replicates, tested in triplicate on two separate occasions. (B) Lipase production analysis in NaHCO3-responsive and -nonresponsive strains grown in media with or without NaHCO3. Values normalized to CA-MHB-Tris for each strain. The data are means of two independent runs performed in triplicate for each condition ± the SD. Statistical comparisons were made using a Kruskal-Wallis single-factor ANOVA and the post hoc pairwise Mann-Whitney U test (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001).

To phenotypically verify that the mecA repression observed in NaHCO3-responsive strains correlated with diminished PBP2a protein production, a macroagglutination PBP2a production assay was utilized. A clear reduction in PBP2a agglutination was observed in both NaHCO3-responsive strains after growth in NaHCO3-containing media (Table 2; see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material), consistent with the reduced expression of mecA. The NaHCO3-nonresponsive strains, COL and BMC1001, displayed high levels of agglutination in media with and without NaHCO3 exposures (Table 2; see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). Although mecA gene expression was not repressible in strain 300-111 in the presence NaHCO3, the level of observable PBP2a agglutination was slightly diminished in media containing NaHCO3.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

PBP2a agglutination of NaHCO3-responsive and -nonresponsive strains grown in media with or without 44 mM NaHCO3

Lipase production is one of the signature phenotypes normally repressed by the global regulator sarA (32, 33). To phenotypically confirm the blunting of sarA gene expression by NaHCO3 exposures seen in NaHCO3-responsive versus -nonresponsive strains, a tributyrin clearance assay was used to measure lipase production. As predicted by NaHCO3 repression of sarA gene expression, NaHCO3-responsive strains had significantly higher levels of lipase activity when exposed to NaHCO3 (Fig. 5C). In contrast, lipase production in NaHCO3-nonresponsive strains was not affected by the presence of NaHCO3 (Fig. 5C).

DISCUSSION

Several studies have demonstrated the importance of NaHCO3, the body’s primary biological buffer, in altering susceptibility of S. aureus to various antibiotics, including β-lactams, as well as to the prototypical host defense peptide, LL-37 (17, 21, 27). Here, we show the ability of NaHCO3 to increase susceptibility in selected MRSA strains to two conventional β-lactam agents commonly used to treat MSSA infections. This raises the intriguing possibility of treating MRSA infections with such β-lactam agents, a concept not currently endorsed by any therapeutic guidelines for MRSA (22). Since such β-lactams are relatively inexpensive and exhibit infrequent serious side effects (34), our findings are of potential clinical relevance. The results show that certain MRSA strains found to be β-lactam susceptible in vitro by AST with NaHCO3 supplementation can be effectively treated by β-lactam therapy in a prototypical model of endovascular infections, experimental IE.

In vitro, NaHCO3-responsive MRSA strains have a typical signature. They are heteroresistant on PAPs and have relatively low MICs within the MRSA range to conventional β-lactams (i.e., to cefazolin and oxacillin). Phenotypically, compared to NaHCO3-nonresponsive MRSA strains, such NaHCO3-responsive MRSA strains are killed significantly better in vitro by these β-lactams in the presence versus absence of NaHCO3, and NaHCO3 substantially represses the growth of their resistant subpopulations.

Importantly, not all strains with relatively low intrinsic β-lactam MICs display the NaHCO3-responsive phenotype, as demonstrated by strain 300-111. Despite displaying nearly identical basal β-lactam MICs to MRSA 11/11 in standard media, this “intermediate” NaHCO3-nonresponsive strain was incompletely cleared from target tissues in experimental IE following cefazolin and oxacillin treatment. These outcomes underscore the concept that the resistant subpopulations of such low-MIC, but NaHCO3-nonresponsive strains cannot be simply eliminated by achieving supra-MIC β-lactam serum levels in such infections. More such “intermediate” strains need to be studied in the IE model to verify this concept.

In our investigations, AST was performed at both 44 mM NaHCO3, a concentration present in certain cell culture media (e.g., DMEM), as well as at 25 mM NaHCO3, a physiologically relevant concentration for humans and rabbits (35). Although we saw highly effective β-lactam-mediated killing of our “responsive” strains in vivo, we saw only a modest impact at physiologically relevant concentrations of 25 mM NaHCO3 in vitro. These results suggested that other factors previously implicated in endovascular pathogenesis, such as host defense peptides (e.g., LL-37 or α-defensin, hNP-1 [36–38]), might synergize with β-lactams at physiological NaHCO3 concentrations to yield in vivo killing mirroring those observed in vitro at 44 mM NaHCO3. Of note, data, at least for LL-37, supported this notion. We recognize that other innate host immune factors (e.g., neutrophils, serum complement, other host peptides, antistaphylococcal antibodies, etc.) may also contribute to enhanced bacterial killing by β-lactams in vivo in the presence of physiological concentrations of NaHCO3.

In terms of how physiological concentrations of NaHCO3 might impact MRSA to alter its intrinsic β-lactam susceptibility profiles, Farha et al. (27) proposed that this molecule was simply acting through its capacity to collapse the proton motive force (PMF; PMF = Δψ + ΔpH). Thus, [HCO3–], via Le Chatelier’s principle, would drive the reaction, H+ + [HCO3–] >>>> H2O + CO2 to consume protons and collapse PMF by mitigating the ΔpH. In their study, these researchers found that an MSSA strain became more resistant to oxacillin in the presence of NaHCO3 (27) and attributed their observations to globally decreased cellular respiration and growth rates. Since β-lactams are more effective against rapidly dividing cells, these authors postulated the mechanism to be based in an overall impact of reduced respiratory energy production to fuel growth in the presence of PMF-modifying concentrations of NaHCO3. In contradistinction, our study observed essentially the opposite result in MRSA, i.e., that certain MRSA strains become highly susceptible to β-lactams in the presence of NaHCO3, indicating that additional changes to MRSA-defining gene expression patterns may overcome any inhibitory effect of NaHCO3 on global cell metabolism to render such strains as β-lactam susceptible.

The β-lactam treatment of rabbits infected with in vitro NaHCO3-responsive strains was highly effective in clearing infection in all target organs assessed. It was hypothesized that a decrease in overall virulence stimulated by growth in a NaHCO3-containing microenvironment might be part of the explanation for increased susceptibility to β-lactam antibiotics under these conditions. However, overnight growth of the NaHCO3-responsive strain, MRSA 11/11, in the presence of 25 or 44 mM NaHCO3 prior to infection had no effect on the strain’s ability to induce or propagate experimental IE.

Intriguingly, our in vitro MIC data obtained in CA-MHB containing 44 mM NaHCO3 was a better predictor of in vivo outcomes than the tissue culture medium RPMI 1640. Although use of the latter medium for AST is gaining some traction as a “host mimicking milieu” (especially for Gram-negative pathogens [20, 25, 39]), we found that it falsely predicted the efficacy of oxacillin and cefazolin for the in vivo treatment of some study MRSA strains, (e.g., BMC1001). Further head-to-head screening in both media, using larger MRSA strain collections, will be required to fully identify which medium is the best predictor of β-lactam efficacy in vivo against MRSA.

Gene expression analyses revealed that mecA and sarA were highly repressed in vitro in NaHCO3-responsive versus NaHCO3-nonresponsive strains. Repression of the mecA gene was, in turn, found to directly correspond to a decrease in PBP2a protein expression. It is unclear, however, whether NaHCO3 has a direct impact on mecA expression, or whether altered mecA gene expression is mediated through repression of sarA or other global regulons. Recent studies have shown that deletion of sarA and sigB can reduce mecA expression (23); therefore, NaHCO3 may be altering mecA expression directly and/or through one or both of these global regulatory pathways. In addition, we observed that the mecA and sarA expression levels were reduced by NaHCO3 exposures in both the presence and the absence of oxacillin induction (Fig. 5A and B). This raises an intriguing dual-mechanism notion that NaHCO3 can directly effect the basal expression of these genes, as well as interfere with mecA induction by β-lactams, such as oxacillin.

As discussed above, Dorschner et al. determined that NaHCO3 had a significant repressive impact on expression of the E. coli homologue of the key S. aureus stress-response regulon, sigB (21). This locus is known to regulate pigment production in S. aureus (40); thus, factors that repress sigB expression ultimately reduce carotenoid production, altering membrane fluidity (41). Carotenoid is critical for oligomerization and proper insertion of PBP2a into the cell membrane (42). NaHCO3’s potentially repressive impact on the sigB regulatory axis could thus result in a decrease in carotenoid production. This event, combined with decreased PBP2a expression in NaHCO3-responsive strains, could yield MRSA cells that are phenotypically “mecA defective.” In this regard, pilot studies in our laboratory have confirmed that in vitro NaHCO3 exposures in both “responsive” and “nonresponsive” MRSA can repress sigB expression, as well as carotenoid production (data not shown). Thus, bicarbonate repression of the sigB regulatory axis does not appear to play a principal role in β-lactam resensitization by bicarbonate in MRSA.

Although we have identified at least two genetic targets of NaHCO3 that may influence MRSA resistance to β-lactams, it is highly likely that NaHCO3 has pleotropic effects on multiple gene expression profiles which may contribute to β-lactam susceptibility in NaHCO3-responsive strains. Furthermore, different pathways may be activated or repressed in individual “responsive” and “nonresponsive” strains, resulting in multiple “genetic types” of NaHCO3 responsiveness. For example, wall teichoic acid (WTA) forms a scaffold for PBP2a maturation, allowing its insertion into the cell membrane (43). Deletion of genes involved in WTA synthesis can render MRSA strains more susceptible to β-lactams (43, 44), indicating that this may be another potential site of NaHCO3 action on gene expression. The modest decrease in PBP2a expression in strain 300-111, despite mecA expression being nonrepressible by NaHCO3 in this strain, highlights the latter point. Thus, NaHCO3 may be affecting multiple pathways in this nonresponsive strain, causing an increase in mecA gene expression but a slight overall decrease in membrane insertion of mature PBP2a.

Another potential “checkpoint” for NaHCO3 is PBP4, a protein involved in the generation of highly cross-linked peptidoglycan. Although this PBP is normally dispensable in MSSA (45, 46), MRSA strains require its activity for proper peptidoglycan cross-linking (47), without which it is dependent on the β-lactam-susceptible PBP2 for peptidoglycan synthesis. Interestingly, inhibition of PBP4 activity has been shown to diminish cell wall cross-linking in β-lactam heteroresistant MRSA strains but had no effect on cross-linking in homoresistant strains (48). Currently, little is known about the regulation of PBP4 expression (49); however, further investigations into the effect of NaHCO3 on PBP4 protein production may offer additional insights into mechanisms underlying NaHCO3-responsive versus NaHCO3-nonresponsive phenotypes.

Other potential genes that might be involved in the “bicarbonate effect” in MRSA include prsA, vraSR, mprF, and graSR (50–57). Each of these genes has been implicated in a phenomenon somewhat akin to NaHCO3/β-lactam responsivity called the “seesaw” effect, in which MRSA cells that evolve daptomycin resistance become resensitized to β-lactams (50–53). Many of these genetic perturbation possibilities are under active investigation in our labs using whole-genome sequencing and RNA sequencing analyses.

One of the major limitations of our study is the fact that only five MRSA strains were investigated. We are currently screening a large collection of well-characterized clinical MRSA strains which represent the broad range of clonal complex, agr, SCCmec, and spa types in current worldwide circulation for their NaHCO3-responsive profiles in vitro. Subsets of these strains will then be subjected to the same in vivo testing in the IE model as in the current work to further verify the linkage between in vitro NaHCO3 responsivity and effective β-lactam therapy in vivo.

A key in vivo finding in the present study was that, in NaHCO3-responsive MRSA IE, neither treatment with oxacillin nor treatment with cefazolin selected for the emergence of high-level (MICs > 64 μg/ml) β-lactam-resistant subpopulations within cardiac vegetations. It should be emphasized, however, that one additional limitation of the present investigation was that rabbit vegetations are considerably smaller than those of humans with IE (∼2 to 3 mm in diameter [corresponding to a weight of ∼50 to 100 mg] versus ∼1 cm in diameter [corresponding to ∼500 to 1,000 mg], respectively) (50–52). Therefore, if bacterial densities observed in the rabbit IE model (which can reach 108 to 109 CFU/gm) are similar to those in humans, then the total bacterial burden in human vegetations would be at least 10 times higher than in the rabbit IE model. This would correspondingly increase the chance that highly resistant subpopulations might well emerge during β-lactam therapy in human IE. This metric will need to be carefully monitored in any future clinical trials. Once a reliable and facile method for identifying potentially β-lactam-responsive MRSA strains has been established and verified, large-scale clinical trials to evaluate the effectiveness of β-lactam therapy for treating selected MRSA infections in human patients would be warranted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and media.The methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains used in this study were all initially derived from patients with clinical infections: MRSA 11/11 (USA300), MW2 (USA400), COL (USA100), BMC1001 (USA500), and 300-111 (CC8, spa type 4, Iberian clone) (53–58). These prototypical strains encompass the range of clonal complex, agr, and SCCmec genotypes that are in current worldwide clinical circulation. In addition, several of these strains have been previously used in experimental studies of virulence, pathogenesis and antimicrobial responsiveness (MW2, COL, and MRSA 11/11) (5, 23, 56, 59). In experimental IE studies, we also included the well-known MSSA strain, ATCC 25923, as a control.

MRSA and MSSA strains were stored at –80°C until thawed for use. They were isolated on tryptic soy agar (TSA) and incubated at 37°C in ambient air. Bacteria were grown for most experiments, including AST, overnight in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CA-MHB; Difco) with the addition of 100 mM Tris (hydroxymethyl-aminomethane) to maintain pH at ∼7.3 ± 0.1 throughout all AST testing (Fisher Scientific). In parallel studies, CA-MHB-Tris was supplemented with either 25 or 44 mM NaHCO3; these NaHCO3 concentrations represent physiologic bloodstream concentrations, and those found in DMEM, respectively. In parallel control assays, AST testing was also performed in the tissue culture medium, Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 (Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% Luria-Bertani (LB) broth. All media were supplemented with 2% NaCl when assays were performed in which MRSA cells were exposed to oxacillin.

MIC assays.The MICs of cefazolin and oxacillin were determined according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines by broth microdilution (12, 13). MRSA were grown overnight in specified media and diluted into the same media containing 2-fold serial dilutions of antibiotics. We added 2% NaCl to all media when performing oxacillin MICs. All MIC values are the mode of at least six independent determinations.

For MIC determinations performed in the presence or absence of salicylic acid, we used CA-MHB plus 100 mM Tris (CA-MHB-Tris) with or without 25 or 50 μg/ml salicylic acid.

Time-kill assays.Cells were grown overnight in specified testing media and diluted to 5 × 105 CFU/ml in 200 μl of same media on a 96-well plate (flat bottom; tissue culture-treated). Based on pilot experiments, cells were incubated at 37°C for 3 h to enter log phase and then diluted to 5 × 105 CFU/ml in 200 μl of the same media, with or without antibiotic, in a 96-well flat-bottom plate. Plates were then incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Surviving cells were quantified at 0, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h of incubation, and data are expressed as the log10 CFU/ml. A bactericidal effect was defined as a ≥3-log10 CFU/ml decline in counts at 24 h versus the count at 0 h.

Population analysis profiles.The PAP protocol was modified from published guidelines (60–63). In brief, agar plates were prepared with Mueller-Hinton Agar (MHA) supplemented with 100 mM Tris, 2% NaCl, and 44 mM NaHCO3 (where indicated) at pH ∼7.3 ± 0.1, containing 2-fold serial dilutions of cefazolin or oxacillin at concentrations ranging from 0.0625 to 1024 μg/ml. Bacterial cells were grown overnight in broth testing medium and diluted to ∼1 × 109 CFU/ml in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Ten-fold serial dilutions were performed in PBS, and 10 μl of each dilution was plated onto the MHA plates. After 48 h of incubation at 30°C, plates were enumerated for viable cells at each drug concentration. The area under a population analysis profile (PAP) curve (AUC) was calculated by linear approximation.

Synergy of β-lactams with host defense peptides.For studies of β-lactam synergy with host defense peptides, a prototypical host defense peptide, LL-37, was used. This cathelicidin peptide is commonly found in large amounts in human epithelial cells, as well as in neutrophils (64, 65), and has been documented to play an important role in innate immunity (66–68). Highly purified LL-37 was purchased commercially from Peptides International (Lexington, KY).

MRSA strains were grown overnight in NaHCO3-free DMEM (Gibco) supplemented with 25 mM NaHCO3 and diluted into the same medium supplemented with 150 mM NaCl. Diluted cells were incubated for 3 h at 37°C to enter log-phase growth. Log-phase cells were then diluted to 1 × 103 CFU/ml with LL-37, cefazolin, and oxacillin, alone or in combination; this inoculum has been used as a standard in our prior killing assays with host defense peptides (69). The final concentrations of the antimicrobials were as follows: 2.5 μg/ml LL-37 (MRSA 11/11), 5 μg/ml LL-37 (MW2 and COL), 0.03125 μg/ml cefazolin and oxacillin (MRSA 11/11), and 0.0625 μg/ml cefazolin and oxacillin (MW2 and COL). These antibiotic concentrations were determined after extensive pilot studies to represent individual drug levels that did not cause ≥50% killing of this starting MRSA inoculum. Surviving cells were quantified after 4 h of incubation with antimicrobials at 37°C, and the percent survival was calculated at this time point as follows: (CFU with antimicrobial/CFU with no antimicrobial) × 100.

Isolation of RNA and quantitative real-time PCR analyses.To quantify expression of two key genes involved in the MRSA phenotype (mecA and sarA), total RNA was isolated from the study strains following overnight growth in media with or without NaHCO3 supplementation using an RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) (59). Cells were grown overnight in specified media (CA-MHB-Tris ± 44 mM NaHCO3) and then diluted 1:100 into the same media and, followed by incubation at 37°C overnight. To quantify the combined effect of oxacillin stimulation and NaHCO3 exposure on gene expression, cells were grown as specified, but diluted into media containing 1/2 MIC of oxacillin (with 2% NaCl). qRT-PCR was performed using primers for mecA, sarA, and gyrB as previously described (59, 70, 71). gyrB was used as a housekeeping gene to normalize transcript quantifications. Relative quantification was calculated using the ΔΔCT method. All qRT-PCR gene expression data were determined from two separate biological replicates for each condition, tested in triplicate. The data are presented as the fold change in gene expression in the presence of NaHCO3 exposures compared to CA-MHB-Tris alone for each strain, with CA-MHB-Tris gene expression data being normalized to 1.0.

PBP2a agglutination assays.A semiquantitative, rapid, and reliable latex agglutination method (Seiken, Tokyo, Japan) was used to measure PBP2a production (72), using beads labeled with specific anti-PBP2a antibody (73). Strains were grown overnight in specified media (CA-MHB-Tris ± 44 mM NaHCO3) at 37°C. Cells were collected by centrifugation, washed once in PBS, resuspended in PBS to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 1.0, and pelleted. Pellets were prepped for PBP2a agglutination according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Agglutination results were scored blindly and separately by two investigators (S.C.E. and L.L.) and scored as high (+++), moderate (++), low (+), or negative (–) based on the presence or absence of an overt agglutination pattern. S. aureus ATCC 43300 (MRSA; PBP2a positive) and ATCC 25923 (MSSA; PBP2a negative) were used as positive and negative controls, respectively, in all assays.

Lipase assays.Lipase production is normally repressed by sarA (33, 74). As a phenotypic readout for NaHCO3-mediated sarA repression, a spectrophotometric assay measuring the rate of clearance of a tributyrin emulsion was used to measure lipase activity (75). Strains were grown overnight in specified media (CA-MHB-Tris ± 44 mM NaHCO3) at 37°C and then diluted to ∼1 × 109 CFU/ml in same media and filter sterilized. A 0.5% (vol/vol) tributyrin solution (Sigma) was prepared in 100 mM Tris (pH 8.0) plus 25 mM CaCl2 and emulsified by sonication for 3 min. The tributyrin emulsion was diluted 1:1 with a 0.8% (wt/vol) low-gelling-temperature agarose (Sigma), and the suspension was maintained at 50°C. Then, 1 ml of the tributyrin suspension was added to 100 μl of each supernatant in a spectrophotometric cuvette, and the OD450 was measured at time zero and at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 min. Lipase activity was calculated as the rate of clearance normalized to the cell density of each sample. A higher rate of clearance corresponds to greater lipase activity. The data are presented as the fold change in lipase activity in the presence of NaHCO3 compared to CA-MHB-Tris alone for each strain, with CA-MHB-Tris alone lipase activity being normalized to 1.0. As stated above, increases in lipase activity correlate with repression of the sarA gene “tone” (activity) (33).

Rabbit model of MRSA infective endocarditis.To verify the in vivo translatability of the relationship between NaHCO3 responsiveness or NaHCO3 nonresponsiveness observed in vitro, a well-characterized rabbit model of indwelling catheter-induced aortic valve infective endocarditis (IE) was used (59). This model is ideal for these studies since it represents a combined acute bacteremia and subacute multitarget organ, high-inoculum infection (66). Rabbits were infected intravenously at 48 h after catheter placement with 2 × 105 CFU/animal of the indicated strain; this inoculum represents the 95% infective dose for inducing IE, as established by extensive pilot experiments for each strain. At 24 h postinfection, the animals were randomized into either an untreated control group (sacrificed at this time point as a therapeutic baseline) or β-lactam-treated groups (100 mg/kg cefazolin or oxacillin, administered by intramuscular injection, three times daily [t.i.d.] for 4 days). These β-lactam treatment strategies encompass (i) dose regimens used in prior studies of experimental IE (5) and (ii) doses that mimic human-like pharmacokinetics in experimental IE (29).

To provide a perspective on the extent of β-lactam-mediated killing in vivo in experimental IE among NaHCO3-responsive versus NaHCO3-nonresponsive MRSA, we performed a parallel study using the highly cefazolin-susceptible MSSA strain, ATCC 25923, treated with the same cefazolin treatment regimen used above for MRSA IE.

In all studies, at 24 h after the last antibiotic treatment, the animals were sacrificed, and their cardiac vegetations, kidneys, and spleens were removed and quantitatively cultured on TSA. MRSA counts were expressed as the mean log10 CFU per gram of tissue (± the standard deviations [SD]). To assess the potential emergence of high-level resistance to either cefazolin or oxacillin for strains MRSA 11/11 and MW2 during such β-lactam treatments, the three target tissues were parallel plated on the above media, but containing 64 μg/ml of the antibiotic of interest. The limit of detection in target organ cultures in this model, based on average target tissue weights, is ≤2 log10 CFU/g.

To determine whether preincubation of NaHCO3-responsive MRSA in media containing NaHCO3 itself might influence the initial induction and/or early progression phases of experimental IE, MRSA 11/11 was grown overnight in CA-MHB-Tris with either 25 or 44 mM NaHCO3. Rabbits were then infected intravenously at 48 h after catheter placement with 2 × 105 CFU/animal with NaHCO3-preexposed cells. At 24 h postinfection, the rabbits were sacrificed, and the same target tissues described above were removed and quantitatively cultured on TSA.

Statistics.All statistical comparisons were made using a Kruskal-Wallis single-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and a pairwise Mann-Whitney U test post hoc comparison. The data are presented, unless otherwise indicated, as the sample means ± the SD. P values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Study approval.Female New Zealand White rabbits (weighing 2.2 to 2.5 kg) were used in all animal studies (Irish Farm). The rabbits were maintained in accordance with the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care criteria. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor–UCLA Medical Center approved all animal study protocols.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This project was supported in part by National Institutes of Health (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease) grants R01 AI100291 (to H.F.C.), R01 AI039108 (to A.S.B.), and R01AI041513, 1R42AI36065-01A1, and R42AI118133 (to Y.Q.X.).

The authors have declared no conflict of interest exists.

All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Specific contributions were as follows: concept and design (S.C.E., A.S.B., and Y.Q.X.), collection of data (S.C.E., W.A., and L.L.), analysis of data (S.C.E., A.S.B., LL, Y.Q.X., and H.F.C.), drafting the manuscript (S.C.E., A.S.B., and Y.Q.X.), critical revision of the manuscript (S.C.E., A.S.B., Y.Q.X., L.L., W.A., and H.F.C.), and final acceptance of the manuscript (all authors).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 5 March 2019.
    • Returned for modification 24 March 2019.
    • Accepted 7 April 2019.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 22 April 2019.
  • Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00496-19.

  • Copyright © 2019 Ersoy et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Tong SY,
    2. Davis JS,
    3. Eichenberger E,
    4. Holland TL,
    5. Fowler VG
    . 2015. Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev 28:603–661. doi:10.1128/CMR.00134-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. David MZ,
    2. Daum RS,
    3. Bayer AS,
    4. Chambers HF,
    5. Fowler VG, Jr,
    6. Miller LG,
    7. Ostrowsky B,
    8. Baesa A,
    9. Boyle-Vavra S,
    10. Eells SJ,
    11. Garcia-Houchins S,
    12. Gialanella P,
    13. Macias-Gil R,
    14. Rude TH,
    15. Ruffin F,
    16. Sieth JJ,
    17. Volinski J,
    18. Spellberg B
    . 2014. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia at 5 US academic medical centers, 2008–2011: significant geographic variation in community-onset infections. Clin Infect Dis 59:798–807. doi:10.1093/cid/ciu410.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Ventola CL
    . 2015. The antibiotic resistance crisis. 1. Causes and threats. P T 40:277.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Vouillamoz J,
    2. Entenza J,
    3. Feger C,
    4. Glauser M,
    5. Moreillon P
    . 2000. Quinupristin-dalfopristin combined with β-lactams for treatment of experimental endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus constitutively resistant to macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:1789–1795. doi:10.1128/AAC.44.7.1789-1795.2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Trotonda MP,
    2. Xiong YQ,
    3. Memmi G,
    4. Bayer AS,
    5. Cheung AL
    . 2009. Role of mgrA and sarA in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus autolysis and resistance to cell wall-active antibiotics. J Infect Dis 199:209–218. doi:10.1086/595740.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Brandt CM,
    2. Rouse MS,
    3. Tallan BM,
    4. Laue NW,
    5. Wilson WR,
    6. Steckelberg JM
    . 1995. Effective treatment of cephalosporin-rifampin combinations against cryptic methicillin-resistant beta-lactamase-producing coagulase-negative staphylococcal experimental endocarditis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 39:1815–1819. doi:10.1128/AAC.39.8.1815.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Purrello S,
    2. Garau J,
    3. Giamarellos E,
    4. Mazzei T,
    5. Pea F,
    6. Soriano A,
    7. Stefani S
    . 2016. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: a review of the currently available treatment options. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 7:178–186. doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2016.07.010.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Edwards B,
    2. Andini R,
    3. Esposito S,
    4. Grossi P,
    5. Lew D,
    6. Mazzei T,
    7. Novelli A,
    8. Soriano A,
    9. Gould I
    . 2014. Treatment options for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection: where are we now? J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2:133–140. doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2014.03.009.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Rayner C,
    2. Munckhof W
    . 2005. Antibiotics currently used in the treatment of infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Intern Med J 35:S3–16. doi:10.1111/j.1444-0903.2005.00976.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Van Bambeke F,
    2. Mingeot-Leclercq M-P,
    3. Struelens MJ,
    4. Tulkens PM
    . 2008. The bacterial envelope as a target for novel anti-MRSA antibiotics. Trends Pharmacol Sci 29:124–134. doi:10.1016/j.tips.2007.12.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Projan S,
    2. Shlaes D
    . 2004. Antibacterial drug discovery: is it all downhill from here? Clin Microbiol Infect 10:18–22. doi:10.1111/j.1465-0691.2004.1006.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. Cockerill FR
    . 2012. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically: approved standard. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  13. 13.↵
    1. Patel J,
    2. Cockerill F,
    3. Alder J,
    4. Bradford P,
    5. Eliopoulos G,
    6. Hardy D,
    7. Hindler J,
    8. Jenkins S,
    9. Lewis J,
    10. Miller L
    . 2014. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 24th informational supplement, vol 34. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  14. 14.↵
    1. Rose WE,
    2. Leonard SN,
    3. Sakoulas G,
    4. Kaatz GW,
    5. Zervos MJ,
    6. Sheth A,
    7. Carpenter CF,
    8. Rybak MJ
    . 2008. Daptomycin activity against Staphylococcus aureus following vancomycin exposure in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:831–836. doi:10.1128/AAC.00869-07.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Akins RL,
    2. Rybak MJ
    . 2001. Bactericidal activities of two daptomycin regimens against clinical strains of glycopeptide intermediate-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:454–459. doi:10.1128/AAC.45.2.454-459.2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kubicek-Sutherland JZ,
    2. Heithoff DM,
    3. Ersoy SC,
    4. Shimp WR,
    5. House JK,
    6. Marth JD,
    7. Smith JW,
    8. Mahan MJ
    . 2015. Host-dependent induction of transient antibiotic resistance: a prelude to treatment failure. EBioMedicine 2:1169–1178. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.08.012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Ersoy SC,
    2. Heithoff DM,
    3. Barnes L,
    4. Tripp GK,
    5. House JK,
    6. Marth JD,
    7. Smith JW,
    8. Mahan MJ
    . 2017. Correcting a fundamental flaw in the paradigm for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. EBioMedicine 20:173–181. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.05.026.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    1. Clarke S,
    2. Haigh R,
    3. Freestone P,
    4. Williams P
    . 2003. Virulence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli, a global pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 16:365–378. doi:10.1128/CMR.16.3.365-378.2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Kenny B,
    2. Abe A,
    3. Stein M,
    4. Finlay BB
    . 1997. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli protein secretion is induced in response to conditions similar to those in the gastrointestinal tract. Infect Immun 65:2606–2612.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Lin L,
    2. Nonejuie P,
    3. Munguia J,
    4. Hollands A,
    5. Olson J,
    6. Dam Q,
    7. Kumaraswamy M,
    8. Rivera H, Jr,
    9. Corriden R,
    10. Rohde M,
    11. Hensler ME,
    12. Burkart MD,
    13. Pogliano J,
    14. Sakoulas G,
    15. Nizet V
    . 2015. Azithromycin synergizes with cationic antimicrobial peptides to exert bactericidal and therapeutic activity against highly multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial pathogens. EBioMedicine 2:690–698. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.05.021.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Dorschner RA,
    2. Lopez-Garcia B,
    3. Peschel A,
    4. Kraus D,
    5. Morikawa K,
    6. Nizet V,
    7. Gallo RL
    . 2006. The mammalian ionic environment dictates microbial susceptibility to antimicrobial defense peptides. FASEB J 20:35–42. doi:10.1096/fj.05-4406com.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Liu C,
    2. Bayer A,
    3. Cosgrove SE,
    4. Daum RS,
    5. Fridkin SK,
    6. Gorwitz RJ,
    7. Kaplan SL,
    8. Karchmer AW,
    9. Levine DP,
    10. Murray BE,
    11. Rybak MJ,
    12. Talan DA,
    13. Chambers HF
    . 2011. Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children. Clin Infect Dis 52:e18–e55. doi:10.1093/cid/ciq146.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Li L,
    2. Cheung A,
    3. Bayer AS,
    4. Chen L,
    5. Abdelhady W,
    6. Kreiswirth BN,
    7. Yeaman MR,
    8. Xiong YQ
    . 2016. The global regulon sarA regulates beta-lactam antibiotic resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in vitro and in endovascular infections. J Infect Dis 214:1421–1429. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiw386.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Hiramatsu K,
    2. Asada K,
    3. Suzuki E,
    4. Okonogi K,
    5. Yokota T
    . 1992. Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence determination of the regulator region of mecA gene in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). FEBS Lett 298:133–136. doi:10.1016/0014-5793(92)80039-J.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Kumaraswamy M,
    2. Lin L,
    3. Olson J,
    4. Sun C-F,
    5. Nonejuie P,
    6. Corriden R,
    7. Döhrmann S,
    8. Ali SR,
    9. Amaro D,
    10. Rohde M,
    11. Pogliano J,
    12. Sakoulas G,
    13. Nizet V
    . 2016. Standard susceptibility testing overlooks potent azithromycin activity and cationic peptide synergy against MDR Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. J Antimicrob Chemother 71:1264–1269. doi:10.1093/jac/dkv487.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Needs CJ,
    2. Brooks PM
    . 1985. Clinical pharmacokinetics of the salicylates. Clin Pharmacokinet 10:164–177. doi:10.2165/00003088-198510020-00004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Farha MA,
    2. French S,
    3. Stokes JM,
    4. Brown ED
    . 2018. Bicarbonate alters bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics by targeting the proton motive force. ACS Infect Dis 4:382–390. doi:10.1021/acsinfecdis.7b00194.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    1. Liu C,
    2. Chambers HF
    . 2003. Staphylococcus aureus with heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin: epidemiology, clinical significance, and critical assessment of diagnostic methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:3040–3045. doi:10.1128/AAC.47.10.3040-3045.2003.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Bergan T
    . 1977. Comparative pharmacokinetics of cefazolin, cephalothin, cephacetril, and cephapirine after intravenous administration. Chemotherapy 23:389–404. doi:10.1159/000222009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Dien Bard J,
    2. Hindler JA,
    3. Gold HS,
    4. Limbago B
    . 2014. Rationale for eliminating Staphylococcus breakpoints for β-lactam agents other than penicillin, oxacillin or cefoxitin, and ceftaroline. Clin Infect Dis 58:1287–1296. doi:10.1093/cid/ciu043.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Weinstein MP,
    2. Patel JB,
    3. Campeau S,
    4. Eliopoulos GM,
    5. Galas MF,
    6. Humphries RM,
    7. Jenkins SG, II,
    8. Lewis JS,
    9. Limbago B,
    10. Mathers AJ,
    11. Mazzulli T,
    12. Patel R,
    13. Richter SS,
    14. Satlin M,
    15. Swenson JM,
    16. Zimmer BL
    . 2018. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  32. 32.↵
    1. Kupferwasser LI,
    2. Yeaman MR,
    3. Nast CC,
    4. Kupferwasser D,
    5. Xiong Y-Q,
    6. Palma M,
    7. Cheung AL,
    8. Bayer AS
    . 2003. Salicylic acid attenuates virulence in endovascular infections by targeting global regulatory pathways in Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Invest 112:222. doi:10.1172/JCI16876.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Cheung AL,
    2. Zhang G
    . 2002. Global regulation of virulence determinants in Staphylococcus aureus by the SarA protein family. Front Biosci 7:d1825–d1842. doi:10.2741/A882.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. Donowitz GR,
    2. Mandell GL
    . 1988. Beta-lactam antibiotics. N Engl J Med 318:490–500. doi:10.1056/NEJM198802253180806.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    MayoClinic. 2018. Bicarbonate, serum. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Rochester, MN. https://www.mayocliniclabs.com/test-catalog/Clinical+and+Interpretive/876.
  36. 36.↵
    1. Mishra NN,
    2. McKinnell J,
    3. Yeaman MR,
    4. Rubio A,
    5. Nast CC,
    6. Chen L,
    7. Kreiswirth BN,
    8. Bayer AS
    . 2011. In vitro cross-resistance of daptomycin and host defense cationic antimicrobial peptides in clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:4012–4018. doi:10.1128/AAC.00223-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Mishra NN,
    2. Bayer AS,
    3. Moise PA,
    4. Yeaman MR,
    5. Sakoulas G
    . 2012. Reduced susceptibility to host-defense cationic peptides and daptomycin coemerge in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from daptomycin-naive bacteremic patients. J Infect Dis 206:1160–1167. doi:10.1093/infdis/jis482.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Dürr M,
    2. Peschel A
    . 2002. Chemokines meet defensins: the merging concepts of chemoattractants and antimicrobial peptides in host defense. Infect Immun 70:6515–6517. doi:10.1128/IAI.70.12.6515-6517.2002.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Sakoulas G,
    2. Rose W,
    3. Berti A,
    4. Olson J,
    5. Munguia J,
    6. Nonejuie P,
    7. Sakoulas E,
    8. Rybak MJ,
    9. Pogliano J,
    10. Nizet V
    . 2017. Classical β-lactamase inhibitors potentiate the activity of daptomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and colistin against Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e01745–16.
  40. 40.↵
    1. Kullik I,
    2. Giachino P,
    3. Fuchs T
    . 1998. Deletion of the alternative sigma factor σB in Staphylococcus aureus reveals its function as a global regulator of virulence genes. J Bacteriol 180:4814–4820.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Tiwari K,
    2. Gatto C,
    3. Wilkinson BJ
    . 2018. Factors influencing the production of different types of fatty acid and staphyloxanthin in the Staphylococcus aureus membrane. Molecules 23:1201. doi:10.3390/molecules23051201.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. 42.↵
    1. García-Fernández E,
    2. Koch G,
    3. Wagner RM,
    4. Fekete A,
    5. Stengel ST,
    6. Schneider J,
    7. Mielich-Süss B,
    8. Geibel S,
    9. Markert SM,
    10. Stigloher C,
    11. Lopez D
    . 2017. Membrane microdomain disassembly inhibits MRSA antibiotic resistance. Cell 171:1354–1367. e20. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.012.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. 43.↵
    1. Brown S,
    2. Xia G,
    3. Luhachack LG,
    4. Campbell J,
    5. Meredith TC,
    6. Chen C,
    7. Winstel V,
    8. Gekeler C,
    9. Irazoqui JE,
    10. Peschel A,
    11. Walker S
    . 2012. Methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus requires glycosylated wall teichoic acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:18909–18914. doi:10.1073/pnas.1209126109.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Campbell J,
    2. Singh AK,
    3. Santa Maria JP, Jr,
    4. Kim Y,
    5. Brown S,
    6. Swoboda JG,
    7. Mylonakis E,
    8. Wilkinson BJ,
    9. Walker S
    . 2011. Synthetic lethal compound combinations reveal a fundamental connection between wall teichoic acid and peptidoglycan biosyntheses in Staphylococcus aureus. ACS Chem Biol 6:106–116. doi:10.1021/cb100269f.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    1. Reed P,
    2. Atilano ML,
    3. Alves R,
    4. Hoiczyk E,
    5. Sher X,
    6. Reichmann NT,
    7. Pereira PM,
    8. Roemer T,
    9. Filipe SR,
    10. Pereira-Leal JB,
    11. Ligoxygakis P,
    12. Pinho MG
    . 2015. Staphylococcus aureus survives with a minimal peptidoglycan synthesis machine but sacrifices virulence and antibiotic resistance. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004891. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004891.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Łeski TA,
    2. Tomasz A
    . 2005. Role of penicillin-binding protein 2 (PBP2) in the antibiotic susceptibility and cell wall cross-linking of Staphylococcus aureus: evidence for the cooperative functioning of PBP2, PBP4, and PBP2A. J Bacteriol 187:1815–1824. doi:10.1128/JB.187.5.1815-1824.2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Memmi G,
    2. Filipe SR,
    3. Pinho MG,
    4. Fu Z,
    5. Cheung A
    . 2008. Staphylococcus aureus PBP4 is essential for β-lactam resistance in community-acquired methicillin-resistant strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:3955–3966. doi:10.1128/AAC.00049-08.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Higashi Y,
    2. Wakabayashi A,
    3. Matsumoto Y,
    4. Watanabe Y,
    5. Ohno A
    . 1999. Role of inhibition of penicillin binding proteins and cell wall cross-linking by beta-lactam antibiotics in low-and high-level methicillin resistance of Staphylococcus aureus. Chemotherapy 45:37–47. doi:10.1159/000007163.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. da Costa TM,
    2. de Oliveira CR,
    3. Chambers HF,
    4. Chatterjee SS
    . 2018. PBP4: a new perspective on Staphylococcus aureus β-lactam resistance. Microorganisms 6:57. doi:10.3390/microorganisms6030057.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. 50.↵
    1. Durack D,
    2. Beeson P,
    3. Petersdorf R
    . 1973. Experimental bacterial endocarditis. III. Production and progress of the disease in rabbits. Br J Exp Pathol 54:142.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    1. Rohmann S,
    2. Erbel R,
    3. Darius H,
    4. Görge G,
    5. Makowski T,
    6. Zotz R,
    7. Mohr-Kahaly S,
    8. Nixdorff U,
    9. Drexler M,
    10. Meyer J
    . 1991. Prediction of rapid versus prolonged healing of infective endocarditis by monitoring vegetation size. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 4:465–474. doi:10.1016/S0894-7317(14)80380-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    1. Jaffe WM,
    2. Morgan DE,
    3. Pearlman AS,
    4. Otto CM
    . 1990. Infective endocarditis, 1983–1988: echocardiographic findings and factors influencing morbidity and mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:1227–1233. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(10)80005-1.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    1. Murthy MH,
    2. Olson ME,
    3. Wickert RW,
    4. Fey PD,
    5. Jalali Z
    . 2008. Daptomycin non-susceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA 300 isolate. J Med Microbiol 57:1036–1038. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.2008/000588-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. 54.↵
    1. Bratu S,
    2. Eramo A,
    3. Kopec R,
    4. Coughlin E,
    5. Ghitan M,
    6. Yost R,
    7. Chapnick EK,
    8. Landman D,
    9. Quale J
    . 2005. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hospital nursery and maternity units. Emerg Infect Dis 11:808. doi:10.3201/eid1106.040885.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. 55.↵
    1. Kornblum J,
    2. Hartman B,
    3. Novick R,
    4. Tomasz A
    . 1986. Conversion of a homogeneously methicillin-resistant strain of Staphylococcus aureus to heterogeneous resistance by Tn551-mediated insertional inactivation. Eur J Clin Microbiol 5:714–718. doi:10.1007/BF02013311.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. 56.↵
    1. Yang S-J,
    2. Xiong YQ,
    3. Boyle-Vavra S,
    4. Daum R,
    5. Jones T,
    6. Bayer AS
    . 2010. Daptomycin-oxacillin combinations in treatment of experimental endocarditis caused by daptomycin-nonsusceptible strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with evolving oxacillin susceptibility (the “seesaw effect”). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:3161–3169. doi:10.1128/AAC.00487-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. 57.↵
    1. Seidl K,
    2. Bayer AS,
    3. Fowler VG,
    4. McKinnell JA,
    5. Hady WA,
    6. Sakoulas G,
    7. Yeaman MR,
    8. Xiong YQ
    . 2011. Combinatorial phenotypic signatures distinguish persistent from resolving methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:575–582. doi:10.1128/AAC.01028-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. 58.↵
    1. Ferry T,
    2. Bes M,
    3. Dauwalder O,
    4. Meugnier H,
    5. Lina G,
    6. Forey F,
    7. Vandenesch F,
    8. Etienne J
    . 2006. Toxin gene content of the Lyon methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone compared with that of other pandemic clones. J Clin Microbiol 44:2642–2644. doi:10.1128/JCM.00430-06.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. 59.↵
    1. Abdelhady W,
    2. Bayer AS,
    3. Seidl K,
    4. Moormeier DE,
    5. Bayles KW,
    6. Cheung A,
    7. Yeaman MR,
    8. Xiong YQ
    . 2014. Impact of vancomycin on sarA-mediated biofilm formation: role in persistent endovascular infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis 209:1231–1240. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiu007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. 60.↵
    1. Moore MR,
    2. Perdreau-Remington F,
    3. Chambers HF
    . 2003. Vancomycin treatment failure associated with heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in a patient with endocarditis and in the rabbit model of endocarditis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:1262–1266. doi:10.1128/AAC.47.4.1262-1266.2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. 61.↵
    1. Pinho MG,
    2. de Lencastre H,
    3. Tomasz A
    . 1998. Transcriptional analysis of the Staphylococcus aureus penicillin binding protein 2 gene. J Bacteriol 180:6077–6081.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. 62.↵
    1. Abdelhady W,
    2. Bayer AS,
    3. Seidl K,
    4. Nast CC,
    5. Kiedrowski MR,
    6. Horswill AR,
    7. Yeaman MR,
    8. Xiong YQ
    . 2013. Reduced vancomycin susceptibility in an in vitro catheter-related biofilm model correlates with poor therapeutic outcomes in experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:1447–1454. doi:10.1128/AAC.02073-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. 63.↵
    1. Chambers HF,
    2. Sachdeva M,
    3. Kennedy S
    . 1990. Binding affinity for penicillin-binding protein 2a correlates with in vivo activity of β-Lactan antibiotics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis 162:705–710. doi:10.1093/infdis/162.3.705.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. 64.↵
    1. Sørensen OE,
    2. Follin P,
    3. Johnsen AH,
    4. Calafat J,
    5. Tjabringa GS,
    6. Hiemstra PS,
    7. Borregaard N
    . 2001. Human cathelicidin, hCAP-18, is processed to the antimicrobial peptide LL-37 by extracellular cleavage with proteinase 3. Blood 97:3951–3959. doi:10.1182/blood.V97.12.3951.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. 65.↵
    1. Yang D,
    2. Chen Q,
    3. Schmidt AP,
    4. Anderson GM,
    5. Wang JM,
    6. Wooters J,
    7. Oppenheim JJ,
    8. Chertov O
    . 2000. LL-37, the neutrophil granule- and epithelial cell-derived cathelicidin, utilizes formyl peptide receptor-like 1 (FPRL1) as a receptor to chemoattract human peripheral blood neutrophils, monocytes, and T cells. J Exp Med 192:1069–1074. doi:10.1084/jem.192.7.1069.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. 66.↵
    1. Scott MG,
    2. Davidson DJ,
    3. Gold MR,
    4. Bowdish D,
    5. Hancock RE
    . 2002. The human antimicrobial peptide LL-37 is a multifunctional modulator of innate immune responses. J Immunol 169:3883–3891. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.169.7.3883.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. 67.↵
    1. Tjabringa GS,
    2. Aarbiou J,
    3. Ninaber DK,
    4. Drijfhout JW,
    5. Sørensen OE,
    6. Borregaard N,
    7. Rabe KF,
    8. Hiemstra PS
    . 2003. The antimicrobial peptide LL-37 activates innate immunity at the airway epithelial surface by transactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor. J Immunol 171:6690–6696. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.171.12.6690.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. 68.↵
    1. Wiesner J,
    2. Vilcinskas A
    . 2010. Antimicrobial peptides: the ancient arm of the human immune system. Virulence 1:440–464. doi:10.4161/viru.1.5.12983.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  69. 69.↵
    1. Mishra NN,
    2. Liu GY,
    3. Yeaman MR,
    4. Nast CC,
    5. Proctor RA,
    6. McKinnell J,
    7. Bayer AS
    . 2011. Carotenoid-related alteration of cell membrane fluidity impacts Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility to host defense peptides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:526–531. doi:10.1128/AAC.00680-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. 70.↵
    1. Abdelhady W,
    2. Chen L,
    3. Bayer AS,
    4. Seidl K,
    5. Yeaman MR,
    6. Kreiswirth BN,
    7. Xiong YQ
    . 2015. Early agr activation correlates with vancomycin treatment failure in multi-clonotype MRSA endovascular infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 70:1443–1452. doi:10.1093/jac/dku547.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. 71.↵
    1. Oliveira DC,
    2. de Lencastre H
    . 2002. Multiplex PCR strategy for rapid identification of structural types and variants of the mec element in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:2155–2161. doi:10.1128/AAC.46.7.2155-2161.2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. 72.↵
    1. Jafri AK,
    2. Reisner BS,
    3. Woods GL
    . 2000. Evaluation of a latex agglutination assay for rapid detection of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 36:57–59. doi:10.1016/S0732-8893(99)00105-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. 73.↵
    1. O’Hara DM,
    2. Reynolds PE
    . 1987. Antibody used to identify penicillin-binding protein 2’ in methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). FEBS Lett 212:237–241. doi:10.1016/0014-5793(87)81352-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  74. 74.↵
    1. Cheung AL,
    2. Koomey JM,
    3. Butler CA,
    4. Projan SJ,
    5. Fischetti VA
    . 1992. Regulation of exoprotein expression in Staphylococcus aureus by a locus (sar) distinct from agr. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:6462–6466. doi:10.1073/pnas.89.14.6462.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. 75.↵
    1. Smeltzer MS,
    2. Hart ME,
    3. Iandolo JJ
    . 1992. Quantitative spectrophotometric assay for staphylococcal lipase. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:2815–2819.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Bicarbonate Resensitization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus to β-Lactam Antibiotics
Selvi C. Ersoy, Wessam Abdelhady, Liang Li, Henry F. Chambers, Yan Q. Xiong, Arnold S. Bayer
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jun 2019, 63 (7) e00496-19; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00496-19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bicarbonate Resensitization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus to β-Lactam Antibiotics
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Bicarbonate Resensitization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus to β-Lactam Antibiotics
Selvi C. Ersoy, Wessam Abdelhady, Liang Li, Henry F. Chambers, Yan Q. Xiong, Arnold S. Bayer
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jun 2019, 63 (7) e00496-19; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00496-19
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

antimicrobial susceptibility testing
MRSA
β-lactams
infective endocarditis
penicillin-binding proteins
sodium bicarbonate

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596