Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Letter to the Editor

KatG as Counterselection Marker for Nontuberculous Mycobacteria

Aron Gagliardi, Petra Selchow, Sakshi Luthra, Daniel Schäfle, Bettina Schulthess, Peter Sander
Aron Gagliardi
aInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Petra Selchow
aInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sakshi Luthra
aInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Schäfle
aInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bettina Schulthess
aInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
bNational Center for Mycobacteria, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Sander
aInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
bNational Center for Mycobacteria, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Peter Sander
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02508-19
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Ed. Note: The authors of the published article did not feel that a response was necessary.

LETTER

In a recent issue of Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Reingewertz et al. (1) report on sensitization of slow-growing, nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) to the anti-tubercular drug isoniazid (INH) upon expression of Mycobacterium bovis KatG.

KatG functions as a catalase-peroxidase (2, 3) and activates INH, which then inhibits InhA, an enzyme involved in mycolic acid synthesis (4). However, a surge in INH-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates is jeopardizing the role of INH as a first-line drug (5). In general, resistance to INH can be acquired by mutations in katG or, less frequently, in the promoter region of inhA (6, 7). In the first case, KatG no longer activates INH, while in the second case, a higher tolerance to the drug is conferred by increased InhA expression (8).

The aim of the aforementioned study was to elucidate the differences between KatG-dependent INH activation in mycobacteria and its effect on INH susceptibility, focusing on the opportunistic pathogens Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis and Mycobacterium marinum (both NTM and naturally refractory to INH).

NTM are mycobacteria not belonging to the M. tuberculosis complex and encompass both slowly and rapidly growing mycobacterial species (SGM and RGM) (9). As shown by our colleagues and other groups (1, 10–12), NTM usually show an innate decreased susceptibility toward INH. Within NTM, RGM have significantly higher INH MICs than SGM (11–13). The reason for this increased resistance is likely the result of several factors, including a failure to activate the prodrug, target-level mutations, differences in the C-terminal domain of KatG (3), the reduction of intracellular concentration (by means of efflux pumps or decreased permeability) (14), and/or the possible nonessentiality of the mycolic acid synthesis pathway in NTM (12). However, essentiality has been proven by identifying pyridomycin as a specific inhibitor of InhA preventing growth of both M. tuberculosis (MIC = 0.39 mg/liter) and NTM (M. marinum MIC = 3.13 mg/liter) (15).

In the context of NTM, no other mycobacteria have proven to be as resilient as the emerging opportunistic pathogens from the Mycobacterium abscessus complex (16). As members of the RGM (9), their intrinsic antibiotic resistance through drug- and target-modifying enzymes (17) has rendered M. abscessus complex infections extremely challenging to treat. Lengthy regimens on multiple drugs with severe side effects are the norm (11, 13). KatG phylogeny pinpointed M. abscessus complex as being closer to M. tuberculosis than rpoB-based phylogeny did (1). Alignment of KatGMabs with KatGMtb shows that the most common INH resistance-conferring clinical M. tuberculosis mutations (18) are absent in M. abscessus ATCC 19977 and sequence identity is high (approximately 72%).

Our research group has taken advantage of the resistance of M. abscessus complex to INH in a manner similar to that used by Reingewertz and coworkers. In a proof-of-concept study, we heterologously expressed KatGMtb in M. abscessus complex from a pMV361 (19) attB-integrative vector containing an apramycin (APR) resistance cassette for selection (aac). This allowed us to develop new tools for the genetic manipulation of M. abscessus complex and to use INH as an effective counterselection marker for allelic replacements (20–24), even if the MIC was well above achievable therapeutical concentrations (MIC = 32 mg/liter) (Fig. 1). Our observations are in strong agreement with the work from Reingewertz et al., showing a drop in MIC of approximately 30-fold, and are proof that INH susceptibility can be successfully exploited. However, the comparatively high MIC of recombinant M. abscessus complex pMV361-aac-katG indicates that besides poor KatG-dependent INH activation, other factors contribute to the high level INH resistance of M. abscessus.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

INH susceptibility of M. abscessus complex strains upon KatGMtb expression. MICs (day 7) for the strains used to generate M. abscessus complex pMV316-aac-katG (unpublished data) are shown. MICs were measured by broth microdilution assay (25). Luria-Bertani (LB) agar with APR and with APR-INH shows selective growth of M. abscessus complex.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the University of Zurich and the Institute of Medical Microbiology. We acknowledge financial support from Lungen Liga Schweiz/Georg and Bertha Schwyzer-Winiker Stiftung (SLA-2018-02) and Foundation for Research in Science and the Humanities at the University of Zurich (STWF-18-011).

  • Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Reingewertz TH,
    2. Meyer T,
    3. McIntosh F,
    4. Sullivan J,
    5. Meir M,
    6. Chang Y-F,
    7. Behr MA,
    8. Barkan D
    . 2019. Differential sensitivity of mycobacteria to isoniazid is related to differences in KatG-mediated enzymatic activation of the drug. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e01899-19. doi:10.1128/AAC.01899-19.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Heym B,
    3. Allen B,
    4. Young D,
    5. Cole S
    . 1992. The catalase–peroxidase gene and isoniazid resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nature 358:591–593. doi:10.1038/358591a0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Heym B,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Poulet S,
    4. Young D,
    5. Cole ST
    . 1993. Characterization of the katG gene encoding a catalase-peroxidase required for the isoniazid susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol 175:4255–4259. doi:10.1128/jb.175.13.4255-4259.1993.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Banerjee A,
    2. Dubnau E,
    3. Quemard A,
    4. Balasubramanian V,
    5. Um K,
    6. Wilson T,
    7. Collins D,
    8. de Lisle G,
    9. Jacobs W
    . 1994. inhA, a gene encoding a target for isoniazid and ethionamide in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 263:227–230. doi:10.1126/science.8284673.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Gumbo T,
    2. Louie A,
    3. Liu W,
    4. Ambrose PG,
    5. Bhavnani SM,
    6. Brown D,
    7. Drusano GL
    . 2007. Isoniazid’s bactericidal activity ceases because of the emergence of resistance, not depletion of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the log phase of growth. J Infect Dis 195:194–201. doi:10.1086/510247.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Larsen MH,
    2. Vilchèze C,
    3. Kremer L,
    4. Besra GS,
    5. Parsons L,
    6. Salfinger M,
    7. Heifets L,
    8. Hazbon MH,
    9. Alland D,
    10. Sacchettini JC,
    11. Jacobs WR, Jr
    . 2002. Overexpression of inhA, but not kasA, confers resistance to isoniazid and ethionamide in Mycobacterium smegmatis, M. bovis BCG and M. tuberculosis. Mol Microbiol 46:453–466. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03162.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Coll F,
    2. McNerney R,
    3. Preston MD,
    4. Guerra-Assunção JA,
    5. Warry A,
    6. Hill-Cawthorne G,
    7. Mallard K,
    8. Nair M,
    9. Miranda A,
    10. Alves A,
    11. Perdigão J,
    12. Viveiros M,
    13. Portugal I,
    14. Hasan Z,
    15. Hasan R,
    16. Glynn JR,
    17. Martin N,
    18. Pain A,
    19. Clark TG
    . 2015. Rapid determination of anti-tuberculosis drug resistance from whole-genome sequences. Genome Med 7:51. doi:10.1186/s13073-015-0164-0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Yew WW,
    3. Barer MR
    . 2012. Targeting persisters for tuberculosis control. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:2223–2230. doi:10.1128/AAC.06288-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Tortoli E,
    2. Fedrizzi T,
    3. Meehan CJ,
    4. Trovato A,
    5. Grottola A,
    6. Giacobazzi E,
    7. Serpini GF,
    8. Tagliazucchi S,
    9. Fabio A,
    10. Bettua C,
    11. Bertorelli R,
    12. Frascaro F,
    13. De Sanctis V,
    14. Pecorari M,
    15. Jousson O,
    16. Segata N,
    17. Cirillo DM
    . 2017. The new phylogeny of the genus Mycobacterium: the old and the news. Infect Genet Evol 56:19–25. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2017.10.013.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Brown-Elliott BA,
    2. Nash KA,
    3. Wallace RJ
    . 2012. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, drug resistance mechanisms, and therapy of infections with nontuberculous mycobacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev 25:545–582. doi:10.1128/CMR.05030-11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Griffith DE, Infectious Disease Society of America,
    2. Aksamit T,
    3. Brown-Elliott BA,
    4. Catanzaro A,
    5. Daley C,
    6. Gordin F,
    7. Holland SM,
    8. Horsburgh R,
    9. Huitt G,
    10. Iademarco MF,
    11. Iseman M,
    12. Olivier K,
    13. Ruoss S,
    14. von Reyn CF,
    15. Wallace RJ,
    16. Winthrop K
    . 2007. An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 175:367–416. doi:10.1164/rccm.200604-571ST.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. van Ingen J,
    2. Boeree MJ,
    3. van Soolingen D,
    4. Mouton JW
    . 2012. Resistance mechanisms and drug susceptibility testing of nontuberculous mycobacteria. Drug Resist Updat 15:149–161. doi:10.1016/j.drup.2012.04.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Haworth CS,
    2. Banks J,
    3. Capstick T,
    4. Fisher AJ,
    5. Gorsuch T,
    6. Laurenson IF,
    7. Leitch A,
    8. Loebinger MR,
    9. Milburn HJ,
    10. Nightingale M,
    11. Ormerod P,
    12. Shingadia D,
    13. Smith D,
    14. Whitehead N,
    15. Wilson R,
    16. Floto RA
    . 2017. British Thoracic Society guideline for the management of non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD). BMJ Open Respir Res 4:e000242. doi:10.1136/bmjresp-2017-000242.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Adams KN,
    2. Szumowski JD,
    3. Ramakrishnan L
    . 2014. Verapamil, and its metabolite norverapamil, inhibit macrophage-induced, bacterial efflux pump-mediated tolerance to multiple anti-tubercular drugs. J Infect Dis 210:456–466. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiu095.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Hartkoorn RC,
    2. Sala C,
    3. Neres J,
    4. Pojer F,
    5. Magnet S,
    6. Mukherjee R,
    7. Uplekar S,
    8. Boy-Röttger S,
    9. Altmann K-H,
    10. Cole ST
    . 2012. Towards a new tuberculosis drug: pyridomycin—nature’s isoniazid. EMBO Mol Med 4:1032–1042. doi:10.1002/emmm.201201689.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Nessar R,
    2. Cambau E,
    3. Reyrat JM,
    4. Murray A,
    5. Gicquel B
    . 2012. Mycobacterium abscessus: a new antibiotic nightmare. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:810–818. doi:10.1093/jac/dkr578.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Luthra S,
    2. Rominski A,
    3. Sander P
    . 2018. The role of antibiotic-target-modifying and antibiotic-modifying enzymes in Mycobacterium abscessus drug resistance. Front Microbiol 9:2179. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02179.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    1. Zhao X,
    2. Hersleth H-P,
    3. Zhu J,
    4. Andersson KK,
    5. Magliozzo RS
    . 2013. Access channel residues Ser315 and Asp137 in Mycobacterium tuberculosis catalase-peroxidase (KatG) control peroxidatic activation of the pro-drug isoniazid. Chem Commun (Camb) 49:11650–11652. doi:10.1039/c3cc47022a.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    1. Stover CK,
    2. de la Cruz VF,
    3. Fuerst TR,
    4. Burlein JE,
    5. Benson LA,
    6. Bennett LT,
    7. Bansal GP,
    8. Young JF,
    9. Lee MH,
    10. Hatfull GF,
    11. Snapper SB,
    12. Barletta RG,
    13. Jacobs WR,
    14. Bloom BR
    . 1991. New use of BCG for recombinant vaccines. Nature 351:456–460. doi:10.1038/351456a0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Rominski A,
    2. Roditscheff A,
    3. Selchow P,
    4. Böttger EC,
    5. Sander P
    . 2017. Intrinsic rifamycin resistance of Mycobacterium abscessus is mediated by ADP-ribosyltransferase MAB_0591. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:376–384. doi:10.1093/jac/dkw466.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Becker K,
    2. Haldimann K,
    3. Selchow P,
    4. Reinau LM,
    5. Dal Molin M,
    6. Sander P
    . 2017. Lipoprotein glycosylation by protein-O-mannosyltransferase (MAB_1122c) contributes to low cell envelope permeability and antibiotic resistance of Mycobacterium abscessus. Front Microbiol 8:2123. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.02123.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    1. Rominski A,
    2. Schulthess B,
    3. Muller DM,
    4. Keller PM,
    5. Sander P
    . 2017. Effect of beta-lactamase production and beta-lactam instability on MIC testing results for Mycobacterium abscessus. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:3070–3078. doi:10.1093/jac/dkx284.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    1. Rominski A,
    2. Selchow P,
    3. Becker K,
    4. Brulle JK,
    5. Dal Molin M,
    6. Sander P
    . 2017. Elucidation of Mycobacterium abscessus aminoglycoside and capreomycin resistance by targeted deletion of three putative resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:2191–2200. doi:10.1093/jac/dkx125.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    1. Dal Molin M,
    2. Gut M,
    3. Rominski A,
    4. Haldimann K,
    5. Becker K,
    6. Sander P
    . 2018. Molecular mechanisms of intrinsic streptomycin resistance in Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e01427-17. doi:10.1128/AAC.01427-17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Reller LB,
    2. Weinstein MP,
    3. Woods GL
    . 2000. Susceptibility testing for mycobacteria. Clin Infect Dis 31:1209–1215. doi:10.1086/317441.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
KatG as Counterselection Marker for Nontuberculous Mycobacteria
Aron Gagliardi, Petra Selchow, Sakshi Luthra, Daniel Schäfle, Bettina Schulthess, Peter Sander
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Apr 2020, 64 (5) e02508-19; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02508-19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
KatG as Counterselection Marker for Nontuberculous Mycobacteria
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
KatG as Counterselection Marker for Nontuberculous Mycobacteria
Aron Gagliardi, Petra Selchow, Sakshi Luthra, Daniel Schäfle, Bettina Schulthess, Peter Sander
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Apr 2020, 64 (5) e02508-19; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02508-19
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • LETTER
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

isoniazid
nontuberculous mycobacteria
Mycobacterium abscessus

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596