Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Clinical Therapeutics

Concurrent Local Delivery of Diflunisal Limits Bone Destruction but Fails To Improve Systemic Vancomycin Efficacy during Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis

Thomas J. Spoonmore, Caleb A. Ford, Jacob M. Curry, Scott A. Guelcher, James E. Cassat
Thomas J. Spoonmore
aDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
bVanderbilt Center for Bone Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Thomas J. Spoonmore
Caleb A. Ford
bVanderbilt Center for Bone Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
cDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
dVanderbilt Institute for Infection, Immunology, and Inflammation (VI4), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacob M. Curry
bVanderbilt Center for Bone Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
eDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott A. Guelcher
aDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
bVanderbilt Center for Bone Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
cDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James E. Cassat
bVanderbilt Center for Bone Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
cDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
dVanderbilt Institute for Infection, Immunology, and Inflammation (VI4), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
eDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
fDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for James E. Cassat
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00182-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    Characterization of PUR and diflunisal-loaded PUR. SEM images of PUR foams containing 0 (A), 10 (B), and 20 mM (C) diflunisal. Scale bar, 200 μm. SEM images of PUR foams were used to determine porosity (%) (D) and pore diameter (μm) (E). (F) Release of diflunisal from PUR. Cumulative release was quantified as the amount of diflunisal released in the leachate normalized by the original amount of diflunisal in the foams. Daily release was quantified as the amount of diflunisal in the leachate at each time point. Error bars represent standard deviation (SD). n = 6 per group.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    Diflunisal does not inhibit vancomycin activity against S. aureus in vitro. S. aureus was cultured overnight with (A) or without (B) 25 μg/ml diflunisal. Diflunisal concentration was based on the total amount of diflunisal released from the foams as determined in Fig. 1. Vancomycin was delivered at concentrations near the MIC with and without diflunisal to characterize the effect of combined delivery on the bactericidal capability of vancomycin. n = 3 technical replicates per group. Error bars represent SD. Data are representative of 3 independent trials. Significance determined by Student's t test.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    Local diflunisal therapy does not inhibit systemic vancomycin activity in vivo. (A) Vancomycin was delivered at 4 different concentrations to determine a suboptimal dose that would significantly decrease the bacterial burdens in murine femurs infected with S. aureus (n = 5 mice per group). Horizontal lines represent the mean. Error bars represent SD. Dotted line depicts the limit of detection (LOD) for bacterial burdens. *, P < 0.05; ****, P < 0.0001. (B, C) Mice were treated with either PUR+Veh or PUR+Dif (see Table 1). At 14 days postinfection, femurs (B) and foams (C) were harvested for CFU enumeration. n = 4 or 5 mice per group (one mouse in the PUR+Veh group had to be euthanized according to humane endpoints). Control group demonstrates bacterial burdens consistent with separate trials (data not shown). *, P < 0.05 relative to PUR+Veh treatment as determined by Student's t test.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    Coadministration of local diflunisal treatment and systemic vancomycin therapy during osteomyelitis. (A) Micro-CT reconstructions of femurs treated with PUR+Veh, PUR+Dif+Veh, PUR+Vanc, or PUR+Dif+Vanc (see Table 1). n = 5 mice per group. One control group mouse suffered pathological fracture (second from left in the PUR+Veh group). (B) Quantification of cortical bone destruction. Error bar represents SD. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 as determined by Student's t test.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • TABLE 1

    Groups and doses of mice treated with vancomycin and diflunisal

    TABLE 1

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental material

    • Supplemental file 1 -

      Supplemental Figures S1 to S3

      PDF, 219K

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Concurrent Local Delivery of Diflunisal Limits Bone Destruction but Fails To Improve Systemic Vancomycin Efficacy during Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis
Thomas J. Spoonmore, Caleb A. Ford, Jacob M. Curry, Scott A. Guelcher, James E. Cassat
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jun 2020, 64 (7) e00182-20; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00182-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Concurrent Local Delivery of Diflunisal Limits Bone Destruction but Fails To Improve Systemic Vancomycin Efficacy during Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Concurrent Local Delivery of Diflunisal Limits Bone Destruction but Fails To Improve Systemic Vancomycin Efficacy during Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis
Thomas J. Spoonmore, Caleb A. Ford, Jacob M. Curry, Scott A. Guelcher, James E. Cassat
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jun 2020, 64 (7) e00182-20; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00182-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Staphylococcus aureus
antivirulence
bone biology
diflunisal
drug delivery
infectious disease
osteomyelitis
quorum quenching
quorum sensing
vancomycin

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596