Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mechanisms of Resistance

Novel Aminoglycoside-Tolerant Phoenix Colony Variants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Devin Sindeldecker, Kelly Moore, Anthony Li, Daniel J. Wozniak, Matthew Anderson, Devendra H. Dusane, Paul Stoodley
Devin Sindeldecker
aDepartment of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
bBiomedical Sciences Graduate Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Devin Sindeldecker
Kelly Moore
aDepartment of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony Li
aDepartment of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel J. Wozniak
aDepartment of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
cDepartment of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew Anderson
aDepartment of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
cDepartment of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Matthew Anderson
Devendra H. Dusane
aDepartment of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Stoodley
aDepartment of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
dDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
eNational Center for Advanced Tribology at Southampton (nCATS), Mechanical Engineering, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00623-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic bacterial pathogen and is known to produce biofilms. We previously showed the emergence of colony variants in the presence of tobramycin-loaded calcium sulfate beads. In this study, we characterized the variant colonies, which survived the antibiotic treatment, and identified three distinct phenotypes—classically resistant colonies, viable but nonculturable colonies (VBNC), and phoenix colonies. Phoenix colonies, described here for the first time, grow out of the zone of clearance of antibiotic-loaded beads from lawn biofilms while there are still very high concentrations of antibiotic present, suggesting an antibiotic-resistant phenotype. However, upon subculturing of these isolates, phoenix colonies return to wild-type levels of antibiotic susceptibility. Compared with the wild type, phoenix colonies are morphologically similar aside from a deficiency in green pigmentation. Phoenix colonies do not recapitulate the phenotype of any previously described mechanisms of resistance, tolerance, or persistence and, thus, form a novel group with their own phenotype. Growth under anaerobic conditions suggests that an alternative metabolism could lead to the formation of phoenix colonies. These findings suggest that phoenix colonies could emerge in response to antibiotic therapies and lead to recurrent or persistent infections, particularly within biofilms where microaerobic or anaerobic environments are present.

INTRODUCTION

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative, opportunistic pathogen responsible for a wide range of infections ranging from those in surgical sites to chronic wounds and the cystic fibrosis (CF) lung (1–3). P. aeruginosa utilizes several methods to establish and maintain an infection, including biofilm production, multidrug resistance, and antibiotic-tolerant persister cell formation (4–7). Multidrug resistance is a growing problem worldwide and is found in numerous bacterial species, including P. aeruginosa (8–12). Additionally, P. aeruginosa isolates have been shown to be hypermutable in the context of infection, which further raises concerns for the development of antimicrobial tolerance and resistance (13). Specifically, aminoglycoside resistance is a growing concern in P. aeruginosa (14–16) and should be considered in all P. aeruginosa-related infections, including periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), CF, and wounds.

Several antibiotic tolerance mechanisms have been identified which could allow for survival of a bacterial population, and tolerance can provide a mechanism to develop full antibiotic resistance (17). Persister cells are bacteria that enter a state of dormancy in which they become metabolically inactive. This dormancy allows for the survival of these bacteria in the presence of antibiotic treatment, but once the antibiotic has dropped below the MIC, these bacteria can regrow, with the resulting population demonstrating wild-type antibiotic susceptibility (4). Although this is a low-frequency event (∼1% of the population [18]), it is a major concern, and it has been hypothesized that they could lead to recurrent infections in humans (7). Another antibiotic survival mechanism of P. aeruginosa, termed adaptive resistance, allows for transient antibiotic resistance through a temporary upregulation of efflux pumps when antibiotics are present. Once the antibiotic pressure is removed, the bacteria downregulate their efflux pumps and return to a wild-type level of antibiotic susceptibility (14, 19). Heteroresistance is another possible survival mechanism, which could allow colonies to grow in an environment with antibiotic levels above the MIC. In a heteroresistant population of bacteria, the overall population appears to be susceptible to antibiotics but contains a hidden, resistant subset of bacteria. During antibiotic exposure, the majority of the population is killed, leaving the resistant subset behind to recolonize as an antibiotic-recalcitrant infection (20). The prevalence of these and other antibiotic tolerance and resistance mechanisms may allow bacterial populations to evade complete killing and lead to recurrent and recalcitrant infections.

Previous work in our lab focused on the use of vancomycin- and tobramycin-loaded calcium sulfate (CaSO4) bone void filler beads to treat PJIs in a Kirby-Bauer-type test (21, 22). After extended culture, variant colonies emerged in the zone of clearing (ZOC) of a P. aeruginosa lawn biofilm (23). In the present study, these variant colonies which emerged in the cleared zone of the lawn biofilm around a tobramycin-loaded CaSO4 bead were characterized to determine if they were classically resistant mutants, persister cells, adaptive resistance colonies, or heteroresistant colonies or if they belonged to another variant colony type of P. aeruginosa.

RESULTS

Variant colonies emerge in the presence of tobramycin-loaded beads.The model used in our assay was similar to that used by Gefen et al. (24) to quantify persister cells in a population by first allowing a zone of inhibition to form in response to an antibiotic-loaded filter paper disk and then replacing the antibiotic disk with a nutrient disk. Switching out the disks caused the antibiotic levels to drop below the MIC, and persister cells and other tolerant phenotypes grew within the zone of inhibition (24). In the present study, we modified Gefen et al.’s (24) protocol to investigate these late-appearing resistant or tolerant phenotypes by first allowing a biofilm lawn to grow for 24 h before placing an antibiotic carrier (a CaSO4 bead or filter paper) in the center and then using an extended incubation to monitor for the appearance of colonies in the ZOC. The emergence of both resistant and susceptible colonies was observed when a 24 h lawn biofilm of P. aeruginosa Xen41 was treated with a tobramycin-loaded bead placed at the center of the plate and incubated for 96 h (Fig. 1A). On days 1 and 2, two distinct zones were visualized with in vivo imaging system (IVIS) bioluminescence imaging, a ZOC surrounding the bead, which demonstrated temporal expansion, and the background lawn. On days 3 and 4 post-tobramycin-loaded bead placement, a third zone of colonies within the ZOC became visible. This zone grew rapidly from day 3 to day 4 and began to encroach on the inner zone of biofilm clearance as well as expand further toward the outer edge of clearance. Images taken on day 5 post-tobramycin-loaded bead placement showed that all colonies which grew within the ZOC were bioluminescent and, thus, metabolically active (Fig. 1B). A pigmentation defect was evident in the variant colonies, causing them to appear white instead of the yellow-green of the wild type. However, this phenotype was transient, and the pigmentation was restored upon subculturing. Additionally, over time, a haze appeared immediately adjacent to the bead within the agar. This haze has been seen before in association with CaSO4 beads (23) and is thought to be a precipitate. The region overlying this haze was swabbed; however, no bacterial growth was derived from cultures.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

In vitro imaging system (IVIS) images of P. aeruginosa Xen41 biofilm plates. (A) IVIS imaging was performed on day 0 of the tobramycin-loaded bead placement and daily thereafter until emergence of phoenix colonies was observed at day 4. Scale is at the right of the panel. Red indicates high levels of metabolic activity, and blue indicates low levels of metabolic activity. (B) IVIS imaging overlay on a black and white photo of the plate showing high levels of metabolic activity in all colonies at 5 days post-tobramycin-loaded bead placement.

Replica plating reveals both antibiotic-sensitive and -resistant colonies.Replica plating was used to determine if variant colonies growing within the ZOC were susceptible or resistant to tobramycin (Fig. 2). While there was a large population of resistant colonies present, a susceptible population of colonies was also identified. Persister cells were found within the variant colony population (Table 1). In addition to replica plating, colonies were also isolated from the ZOC of a tobramycin-loaded bead 5 days posttreatment using sterile pipette tips and placed into both LB broth and LB broth containing 5 μg/ml of tobramycin. These counts revealed an additional population of colonies, which grew and were active on the original plates but were unable to be cultured in either the presence or absence of tobramycin (Table 1). We refer to these colonies as viable but nonculturable colonies (VBNCs). We refer to the susceptible colonies as “phoenix” colonies because they arise from the dead bacterial lawn and proliferate in the presence of antibiotic treatments. In order to ensure that phoenix colony development is not a CaSO4 bead-specific or a strain-specific phenomenon, colony counts were also obtained for the equivalent concentration of tobramycin placed on sterile filter paper disks as well as for P. aeruginosa PAO1. While the differences between resistant colony emergence rates were significant, there was no significant difference in the number of phoenix colonies produced between either strain or either antibiotic delivery method (Fig. 3).

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Replica plating reveals resistant, phoenix colony, viable but nonculturable (VBNC), and persister cell variants. Images are of representative replica plates (n = 3). (A) Original plate before replica plating. (B) LB replica plate. (C) LB plus tobramycin replica plate. (A to C) Blue arrows represent colonies which grew on all three plate types and are thus resistant colonies. Green arrows represent colonies which appeared on the original and LB replica plate but not the LB replica plate containing tobramycin and are thus phoenix colonies. Purple arrows represent colonies which only grew on the original plate and thus are VBNCs. Yellow arrows represent likely persister cells, which did not appear on the original plate but grew on the LB replica plate only.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 1

Variant phenotype colony counts for P. aeruginosa PAO1 exposed to tobramycin for 5 daysa

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

P. aeruginosa variant colonies emerge regardless of antibiotic delivery method. Colony counts were obtained of variants which emerged in response to tobramycin-loaded beads in each strain as well as to 1 mg of tobramycin in solution placed on a sterile filter disk in each strain. There was no significant difference in the number of phoenix colonies produced across all condition comparisons. Data are reported as the mean ± SD (n = 3).

Phoenix colonies have no defect in growth kinetics.Growth curves were generated for each isolate which emerged on the agar plate after treatment with antibiotic. Phoenix and resistant colonies were each compared with wild-type P. aeruginosa Xen41 (Fig. 4A). No significant difference in the maximum specific growth rate was observed for either phoenix colonies (P = 0.2981) or resistant colonies (P = 0.3168) compared to the wild type (Fig. 4B). We also measured the in situ growth of variant colonies. Colonies were measured over time as they appeared within the ZOC, and the phenotypes were compared (Fig. 4C). No significant difference was observed among the variants.

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Phoenix colonies have no defect in growth kinetics. (A) The OD600 was measured every 10 min for wild-type and phoenix isolates. Mean values (thick lines) and SD (thin lines) were plotted for resistant isolates (n = 7), phoenix colonies (n = 20), and wild-type P. aeruginosa Xen41 (n = 3). (B) Maximum specific growth rates were measured for each of the panel A curves. There was no significant difference between wild-type (WT) and resistant isolates (P = 0.3168) or between wild-type and phoenix colonies (P = 0.2981). (C) In situ colony growth was measured over time for resistant colonies (n = 29), phoenix colonies (n = 11), and VBNCs (n = 4) exposed to antibiotics. Time 0 represents the time at which the colonies were first noted. Although the phoenix colonies were consistently smaller, there was no significant difference found in colony size between any of the other groups at any time point. Data are reported as the mean ± SD.

Tobramycin concentrations remain above the MIC during emergence of variant colonies.In order to examine the possible phenotype of phoenix colonies, various studies were performed. First, it was important to define the concentration of tobramycin to which the variant colonies were exposed in order to determine if phoenix colonies could simply be persister cells. Tobramycin concentrations from the beads could diffuse to sub-MIC levels after clearing the biofilm lawn and could allow persister cells to emerge. Tobramycin levels were measured both in sterile agar (Fig. 5A) and in biofilm lawns that had been exposed to tobramycin-loaded beads (Fig. 5B). Five days post-tobramycin-loaded bead placement, the tobramycin concentration in the agar was five times higher than the MIC at the edge of the variant colony radius. Additionally, the tobramycin concentration was 20 times higher than the MIC within the lawn biofilm. The amount of tobramycin within the biofilm was similar between free, unbound tobramycin and tobramycin that was trapped either inside cells or on the cell surface or bound within the biofilm extracellular polymeric substance (EPS). In these high concentrations of antibiotic, persister cells would be predicted to not grow (7).

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Tobramycin concentration remains above the MIC during phoenix colony emergence. (A) A tobramycin-loaded bead was placed in sterile LB agar, and at various time points, agar plugs were extracted at various radii to examine the concentration of tobramycin by plating for MIC (n = 3) (data reanalyzed from reference 23). MIC zones were compared to a standard curve to calculate the tobramycin concentrations in the agar plugs. (B) At various radii, the lawn of a day 4 post-bead placement plate was resuspended, separated into fractions of freely diffusible and bound tobramycin, plated, and plotted against a standard curve to calculate the concentration of tobramycin. In the variant zone, both the intracellular and extracellular concentrations remain higher than the MIC. Data are reported as the mean ± SD.

Phoenix colonies are different than an adaptive resistance phenotype.In order to assess the potential for phoenix colonies to be the result of adaptive resistance through transient efflux pump upregulation (19), bacteria were exposed to phe-arg-β-naphthylamide (PAβN), a broad-spectrum efflux pump inhibitor, in conjunction with a tobramycin-loaded bead. No significant difference (P = 0.5377) was observed between the number of phoenix colonies which developed in the presence of (8.3 ± 6.6) or absence of (5.3 ± 4.0) exposure to PAβN. Since phoenix colonies are unable to be properly categorized in a known resistance, tolerance, or persistence phenotype, they appear to be a distinct, tolerant phenotype, able to survive and remain metabolically active despite the presence of high concentrations of antibiotics; however, once they are removed from the antibiotic-containing environment, they return immediately to a wild-type level of antibiotic susceptibility.

Phoenix colony progeny produce consistent numbers of phoenix colonies.A heritability study was performed in order to determine if the phoenix colony phenotype could be selected for and passed on to the progeny. Phoenix colonies were isolated per the standard procedure (Fig. 6A) and plated to obtain a second-generation population (Fig. 6B) and third-generation population (Fig. 6C). While there was no significant difference in resistant colonies produced from the first to second generations (P = 0.1024), there was a significant increase in resistant colonies from the second to third generations (P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference when comparing phoenix colony counts from the first to second generations (P = 0.9300) or from the second to third generations (P = 0.4529). This indicates that phoenix colony emergence remains stable and cannot be selected for or enriched.

FIG 6
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 6

Phoenix colony heritability is stable. (A) Variant colonies were generated as described, replica plated, and enumerated. Replica plating was performed, and counts were taken of the number of resistant and phoenix colonies. Phoenix colonies were isolated and grown overnight before being plated again. (B) Isolate cultures were then plated and allowed to grow for 5 days in the presence of a tobramycin-loaded bead. These plates were replica plated, and colony counts were obtained. Phoenix colonies were again isolated and grown in overnight broth cultures. (C) Isolate cultures from step B were plated and allowed to grow for 5 days in the presence of a tobramycin-loaded bead. Replica plating was again performed and colony counts obtained. No significant difference was seen in the number of phoenix colonies produced for each generation. Data are reported as the mean ± SD.

Anaerobic environments provide protection from killing by tobramycin.Previous studies have linked antibiotic tolerance in P. aeruginosa to anaerobic environments (25), which led us to evaluate the effect of oxygen depletion on the emergence of variant colonies. In order to examine the possibility that an altered metabolic state could select for the emergence of phoenix colonies, biofilm lawns of P. aeruginosa PAO1 were generated in an anaerobic chamber. After 24 h of biofilm lawn growth in the anaerobic chamber on either LB agar or LB agar containing 100 mM KNO3, to serve as an alternative terminal electron acceptor, a tobramycin-loaded bead was placed into its center. The plates were incubated anaerobically for 5 additional days. After the plates were removed from the anaerobic chamber, there was no visible ZOC, despite the lawn growth on LB agar plates, indicating that the anaerobic environment had led to protection of the biofilm lawn. In contrast, complete clearance of the lawn on LB agar plates containing KNO3 occurred, indicating that with supplementation with a terminal electron acceptor, the lawn was active and able to be killed by tobramycin to an even higher degree than plates in an aerobic environment. The plates were immediately replica plated onto LB agar with and without tobramycin. After 24 h, a confluent lawn was observed on each of the LB agar replica plates derived from the original plates lacking KNO3, and there was no growth on the replica plates containing tobramycin. This indicates that while the anaerobic environment had protected the biofilm lawn from the original tobramycin treatment, the lawn had returned to wild-type levels of susceptibility once placed in an aerobic environment. Replica plates derived from the LB agar plates containing KNO3 produced slight growth on the LB agar plate and no growth on antibiotic-containing plates, further confirming the killing of the original LB agar plate containing KNO3 in the anaerobic chamber (Fig. 7). These data indicate that phoenix colonies may be protected by an anaerobic microenvironment within the biofilm and that denitrification is not the metabolic process utilized by phoenix colonies to remain active and survive antibiotic exposure. It is possible that phoenix colonies utilize either fermentation or an alternative metabolic process to be able to grow in an anaerobic environment and survive antibiotic exposure.

FIG 7
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 7

Anaerobic environments provide bacterial protection from antibiotics. Tobramycin-loaded beads were placed in the center of 24 h lawn biofilms grown on LB agar and LB agar containing 100 mM KNO3 in an anaerobic environment. The plates remained in the anaerobic environment for 5 days before being imaged using IVIS and replica plated on LB agar and LB agar containing 5 μg/ml of tobramycin. The replica plates were grown aerobically for 24 h before IVIS imaging was performed. While the anaerobic environment protected the lawn from killing, supplementing the plates with KNO3 allowed the lawn to be killed across most of the plate.

Planktonic populations are eradicated by high concentrations of tobramycin.In both a previous (23) and the current study, biofilm lawns showed an area of complete bacterial eradication immediately adjacent to the highly concentrated antibiotic source from which no resistant, tolerant, or persister cell variants could be cultured. In order to test if similarly efficient eradication could occur in a planktonic state, stationary-phase cultures of P. aeruginosa PAO1 were incubated for 48 h with various high concentrations of tobramycin. After incubation, broth culture samples were plated for CFU counts and incubated for 7 days in order to allow any dormant or slowly growing phenotypes to appear before being counted. In all tested concentrations (400 to 1,000 μg/ml), no bacteria were recovered, despite the long incubation. Due to the very high concentrations of tobramycin, there was concern that an osmolarity effect may be causing bacterial cells to lyse. A control study was performed to determine if the high solution osmolarity caused by the large amount of tobramycin could account for the total eradication, as opposed to cell death being exclusively caused by the aminoglycoside mechanism of action. Dextrose was used to produce equivalent osmolarity in additional bacterial samples lacking tobramycin. The dextrose samples showed growth of 2.7 ± 0.5 × 109 CFU/ml, indicating that the bacteria are able to survive despite the high osmolarity exposure when such high concentrations of tobramycin are present.

DISCUSSION

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an important bacterial pathogen which is able to cause infections in several human-associated environments, including the lungs, wounds, and postsurgical sites. Its ability to form biofilms and resist antibiotic therapy is something which must be better understood to help clear infections and deal with the rise of multidrug resistance (4, 6, 8, 9, 26, 27). Calcium sulfate beads, cements, and bone fillers are routinely impregnated with antibiotics and placed at the surgical site during orthopedic revision surgeries to provide local therapy to treat infections (21). It is important to note that each of these methods allows an antibiotic gradient to develop in which the region immediately adjacent to the antibiotic source contains high enough drug concentrations to eradicate bacterial biofilms and antibiotic variants, but diffusion limitation leads to areas with lower concentrations, including those at sub-MICs. While these local antibiotic therapy methods may effectively kill a large number of planktonic or biofilm-associated bacteria, the presence and gradient of antibiotics could also facilitate emergence of antibiotic-tolerant variants, potentially resulting in a chronic or recurrent infection (28). Three variant colony phenotypes of P. aeruginosa were identified in this study: (i) classically resistant mutants, (ii) phoenix colonies, and (iii) VBNCs, all of which emerged in the presence of tobramycin. This is not due to a calcium sulfate chemistry-specific phenomenon but, instead, likely occurs in any antibiotic release mechanism in which gradients form due to diffusion limitation. It is important to note that the variant colonies take 3 to 5 days to emerge and only do so after the surrounding wild-type bacterial lawn has been killed. We propose that the death of the wild-type bacteria allows the variant colonies, which presumably exist as small proportions in the lawn, to emerge and generate discrete, visible colonies.

The observed resistant mutants are heritable and therefor likely caused by a genetic mutation. Acquired antibiotic resistance in P. aeruginosa is well documented and can occur by a number of mechanisms, including increase in efflux pump expression and modification of the antibiotic target site (5, 12, 15, 29–31). The phoenix colonies, however, appear to be driven by a new mechanism, as they are able to maintain metabolic activity and growth in the presence of high concentrations of tobramycin but revert to wild-type susceptibility once they are removed from the environment and subcultured (Fig. 8). Similar studies were performed by Gefen et al. (24), who studied the emergence of tolerant phenotypes by allowing the antibiotic concentration to drop below MIC levels. The concentration of antibiotic used in their study was significantly lower than that used in our study. In the current study, we showed that phoenix colonies are different from persister cells. The persister cells survive antibiotic therapy by entering a state of dormancy, which allows survival while the antibiotic is present. Once the antibiotic concentration drops below the MIC, the persister cells are able to reactivate and grow (7), while phoenix colonies thrive in the antibiotic-laden environment and do not seem to enter any dormancy phase. The phoenix colonies also exhibit a nonheritable change in pigmentation from yellow-green to white. This loss of pigmentation suggests a reduction in pyocyanin production, which may also give clues to the molecular mechanism behind the production of the phoenix colonies. While the phoenix colonies emerge at a very low frequency, it is still possible that they could survive antibiotic therapy and cause recolonization and perpetuation of an infected site.

FIG 8
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 8

Antibiotic variant flow chart. Following the flow chart allows one to easily determine the antibiotic variant classification of cultures and isolates. Although this chart is based on a pregrown biofilm lawn of P. aeruginosa exposed to tobramycin, it can easily be adapted to other antibiotics, strains, and culturing techniques.

In addition to tobramycin, gentamicin, another aminoglycoside antibiotic, also showed an emergence of phoenix colonies (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material), while ciprofloxacin and colistin did not (Fig. S2 and S3). While inhibition of DNA replication activity (ciprofloxacin) or membrane integrity (colistin) did not produce growth of the phoenix phenotype, it is possible that the mechanisms behind phoenix colony emergence may be linked to disruption of ribosome assembly and translation. Further studies, including transcriptomic and genomic sequencing, are needed to elucidate the mechanisms responsible for the emergence of phoenix colonies.

Previous studies have shown that an alternate metabolism caused by an anaerobic environment could lead to antibiotic tolerance in P. aeruginosa (25). Due to the presence of anaerobic microenvironments within a biofilm, it is possible that phoenix colonies originate in an anaerobic or microaerobic portion of the biofilm lawn and enter an alternate metabolic state, which then confers tolerance to the presence of antibiotics. The anaerobic chamber data presented here support the likelihood of this possibility, as there was no apparent killing of the biofilm lawn grown in the anaerobic chamber, but once removed to an aerobic environment, the biofilm lawn returned to being tobramycin susceptible. In addition, when given a terminal electron acceptor (nitrate), the lawn was able to utilize denitrification but regained susceptibility to the tobramycin, suggesting that a different alternate metabolism is responsible for the protection of the phoenix colonies.

While VBNCs were noted in our experiments, it was difficult to study them due to the lack of an ability to culture them following their initial appearance. This population could play a role in infection, but this remains purely speculative. It is likely that the VBNCs are dependent on a compound in the plate environment released from dead or dying cells that is not present once the colonies are subcultured. Further study is needed to better understand this phenotype as well as to examine the spatial distribution of VBNCs and phoenix colonies during development within the biofilm. With advancements in live single cell imaging, as well as the development of viability and metabolic reporter stains, further insight into these rare subpopulations found within biofilms should be achievable, which is a topic of our current study.

Although phoenix colonies, resistant mutants, and persister cells could lead to chronic or recurrent infections, it is important to note that high concentrations of tobramycin eradicated these variant colonies near the tobramycin-loaded beads. This is supported by the lack of growth in the ZOC on replica plates as well as by the lack of growth in cultures taken from the zone immediately surrounding the tobramycin-loaded bead where there would initially be very high concentrations of antibiotic. This suggests that closely packed antibiotic-loaded CaSO4 beads or high enough concentrations of antibiotics may be able to kill all phoenix colonies, resistant mutants, persister cells, and any other P. aeruginosa colony variants.

In conclusion, we have identified a novel, tolerant phenotype known as phoenix colonies which emerge along with other antibiotic-resistant and -tolerant variants from the ZOC of high concentrations of tobramycin. Further study, including transcriptomic or genomic sequencing, is needed to understand the complete mechanism behind the emergence of phoenix colonies and other phenotypic P. aeruginosa variants, including VBNCs, to understand how best to approach prevention and treatment strategies for patients with chronic or recurrent infections while also combating the increasing occurrence of multidrug resistance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strain and culture conditions.The bioluminescent strain P. aeruginosa Xen41 (Xenogen Corp., USA) and its parent P. aeruginosa PAO1 were used in this study. Glycerol stock cultures were stored at –80°C and streaked onto fresh Luria-Bertani (LB) agar plates that were incubated for 24 h. Isolated colonies from the LB agar plates were transferred to 20 ml of LB broth and incubated overnight on an incubator shaker set at a temperature of 37°C and at a speed of 200 rpm.

Preparing lawn biofilms of P. aeruginosa.Spreading the overnight culture on LB agar generated lawn biofilms of P. aeruginosa Xen41 and PAO1. Briefly, the overnight P. aeruginosa Xen41 or PAO1 culture grown in LB broth was diluted to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.1. Then, 100 μl of the diluted culture was spread onto a 100-mm diameter polystyrene petri plate (Fisher Scientific, USA) containing LB agar. The petri plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h to develop a lawn biofilm of P. aeruginosa. Additionally, the CFU/cm2 of the lawns was measured to be used as a reference value. In short, a biofilm lawn was generated, and a 1 cm by 1 cm area was marked and isolated using a sterile plastic loop in 1 ml of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). A dilution series was generated and plated onto LB agar by dripping 5 μl of each dilution onto the agar surface and allowing it to dry. The plates were then incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 overnight. Colonies were then counted, and the CFU/cm2 of the lawn was calculated to be 5 ± 2 · 109 CFU/cm2.

Preparation of tobramycin-containing calcium sulfate beads.All experiments conducted required the preparation of CaSO4 (Sigma-Aldrich) beads containing tobramycin. We used 240 mg of tobramycin (Sigma-Aldrich) per 20 g of CaSO4, a ratio commonly used by orthopedic surgeons when mixing antibiotics into pharmaceutical grade CaSO4 bone void filler for local release at the surgical site in PJIs (32). Once the tobramycin and CaSO4 were mixed together, sterile water was added and mixed for approximately 1 min until a thick paste was produced. This paste was spread into silicone molds (Biocomposites Ltd.) to form hemispherical beads of 4.5 mm diameter and allowed to dry overnight.

Exposure of lawn biofilms to antibiotic-loaded beads.After generation of a 24-h lawn biofilm, a tobramycin-loaded bead was placed in the center of the plate using sterile forceps. The forceps were used to also push the bead into the agar. Once the bead was placed, the plate was incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator (Heracell 150i; Thermo Scientific) for 3 days and checked daily for the appearance and spread of a ZOC as well as any colonies appearing in this zone. In vitro imaging system (IVIS) images were taken daily to monitor bioluminescence, which is an indicator of metabolic activity within P. aeruginosa Xen41. Photographic images were also taken at the same time. After 3 days, IVIS and photographic images were taken again, and variant colonies in the zone of lawn clearing were manually counted.

Bioluminescence imaging.Bioluminescence imaging was performed using IVIS imaging. Thirty-second exposures were obtained for each plate imaged. A pseudo-color heatmap was applied where red indicates high light intensity, blue indicates low levels of light intensity, and black indicates no light present. While a black color indicates a lack of activity, it cannot be used to rule out cell viability.

Determination of sensitive and resistant strains using replica plating.To characterize the colonies in the cleared zone and to screen for persisters, we used replica plating (33). A sterile cotton velveteen square (150 by 150 mm) was aseptically draped over a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) replica plater and locked in place with an aluminum ring. The tobramycin-loaded bead was removed from the center of the plate after 5 days of incubation using a sterile plastic loop. The plate was then marked to indicate the 12 o’clock position, gently placed onto the velveteen square, and tapped gently to ensure complete contact of the plate with the velveteen. The plate was then removed from the replica plater, and a fresh, sterile LB agar plate containing 5 μg/ml of tobramycin and marked at the 12 o’clock position was placed on the velveteen square. This plate was also tapped gently to ensure complete contact with the velveteen surface and then removed. Finally, a fresh, sterile LB agar plate marked at the 12 o’clock position was placed on the velveteen square and tapped gently to ensure complete surface contact. Both of the fresh replica plates were incubated for 24 h at 37°C in an incubator with 5% CO2. After incubation, the pattern of the plates was compared, and colonies which appeared on both plates were deemed to be resistant mutants. Total colony counts were compared between the original plate and replica plates. The difference between the two can be explained by the presence of persister cells, and thus, persister cell calculations were completed in this manner. Colonies which appeared on the original plates but on neither of the replica plates were deemed to be VBNCs. An additional population of colonies was observed which appeared on the LB agar replica plate but not on the LB agar replica plate containing tobramycin. Because they do not fit into any of the other categories, we termed these phoenix colonies. All phoenix colonies were isolated and subjected to MIC testing for confirmation of susceptibility to tobramycin. In addition to replica plating, colonies were isolated in LB broth to confirm the lack of growth of VBNCs in the replica plating results. In short, variant colonies were generated as above and then isolated using sterile pipette tips and dipped into 200 μl of LB broth containing 5 μg/ml of tobramycin in a well of a 96-well plate (Corning, Sigma-Aldrich). The pipette tip was then dipped into the corresponding well of another 96-well plate containing 200 μl of LB broth. A total of 96 colonies were isolated from three different plates for a total of 288 colonies. The plates were then incubated for 96 h at 37°C with 5% CO2. After incubation, the turbidity in the wells of each plate was compared. VBNCs were determined by lack of growth in the LB broth as well as the corresponding well of LB broth containing the tobramycin. Percentages for the phoenix and resistant strains were found to be consistent in the VBNC broth study compared to replica plating. The data presented in Table 1 were derived by combining both replica plating counts and VBNC broth data. Briefly, the VBNC percentage was taken directly from the VBNC broth data. This value was then subtracted from 100%, and the remaining percentage was used to calculate the phoenix, resistant, and persister cell proportions based on colony counts from replica plating.

Alternative antibiotic testing.In addition to tobramycin, additional clinically relevant antibiotics were tested for the emergence of phoenix colonies. Gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, and colistin are routinely used to treat P. aeruginosa infections (34, 35). Each of these antibiotics was examined in studies similar to those described above, including variant colony generation and replica plating. Phoenix colonies emerged within the ZOC of gentamicin (Fig. S1) but not in the ZOC of ciprofloxacin (Fig. S2) or colistin (Fig. S3), indicating that this may be an aminoglycoside-exclusive phenotype.

Comparison of the emergence of phoenix colonies by strain and antibiotic delivery method.In order to examine the emergence of phoenix colonies in different strains of Pseudomonas as well as to determine if CaSO4 directly linked this emergence to antibiotic delivery, comparison studies were completed. Overnight cultures of P. aeruginosa Xen41 and PAO1 were generated as described above. Each culture was diluted to an OD600 of 0.1, and 100 μl of the solution was spread onto sterile LB agar. Six plates were spread with Xen41, and six plates were spread with PAO1. All plates were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 overnight. After 24 h, a sterile filter disk (7 mm, Remel, Thermo Scientific) was placed in the center of three of the Xen41 and three of the PAO1 plates, and 10 μl of a 10-mg/ml tobramycin solution was placed on the disk to match the tobramycin potency in a tobramycin-loaded bead. Tobramycin-loaded beads were placed in the center of each of the six remaining plates as described above. All plates were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 5 days post-initial antibiotic exposure. Replica plating was performed, and colony counts were obtained for each plate and are represented by the mean ± standard deviation (SD).

Growth rate studies of isolates.To determine whether the phoenix colonies might have a growth defect and to rule out the presence of small colony variants (SCVs), we performed growth curves and measured colony diameter as a function of time on the plates. Variant colony generation was performed as described above, and after generation and characterization of the variant isolate MIC, growth curves were generated for each isolate along with wild-type P. aeruginosa Xen41 growth curves. In short, isolates were placed in 200 μl of LB broth in a well of a 96-well plate. The plates were then placed in a plate reader (SpectraMax i3x; Molecular Devices) and incubated statically at 37°C for 15 h. OD600 readings were taken every 10 min, with 5 s of orbital shaking occurring before each read. After the growth curves were generated, growth curve data from phoenix colony replicates were averaged to determine the mean OD600 at each time point. The same was done for resistant isolates and wild-type samples. The data were plotted as the mean ± SD. The maximum growth rate for each of these mean curves was also calculated from the maximum slope during the exponential phase and is presented as the mean ± SD. In situ growth on the plate was also measured for variant colonies. Variant colonies were generated as described above, and once colonies began to be visible, images were taken of the plates at various time points. After 5 days, the plates were replica plated, and each colony’s phenotype was determined. In addition to variant colonies, a dilution series of P. aeruginosa PAO1 was made and spread on several plates. These plates were then observed for the emergence of colonies, and once colonies were visible, images were taken of the plates at various time points. The images of all of the plates were then analyzed using image analysis software to measure the diameter of each colony. Measurements were grouped together based on variant colony phenotype, and the data were plotted as the mean ± SD.

Calculation of tobramycin concentration in agar plates and biofilm lawn.To measure the concentration of tobramycin in the agar and the biofilm as a function of time and radial distance from the tobramycin-loaded bead, we first generated a standard curve and then excised portions of both a biofilm lawn and agar exposed to a tobramycin-loaded bead in order to calculate the concentration of tobramycin in each by using a Kirby-Bauer-type assay. First, we generated calibration curves by diluting an overnight culture of P. aeruginosa PAO1 to an OD600 of 0.1 and spreading the dilution onto sterile LB agar. A sterile filter disk was then placed in the center of the plate, and 10 μl of various tobramycin potencies (8 to 500 μg/ml) was placed onto the disk. The plate was incubated for 24 h at 37°C with 5% CO2. After incubation, the zones of inhibition were measured and plotted to produce a standard curve (y = 5.2384ln[x] – 2.3996, R2 = 0.9994).

Once the standard curve was generated, the tobramycin concentration in the agar at various radii and time points was measured. Tobramycin-loaded beads were placed into sterile LB agar plates. The plates were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2, and at various time points, plates were removed and marked with 5 mm by 5 mm squares from the edge of the bead to the edge of the plate. Each of these squares was excised using a razor blade and forceps. The excised plug was then melted at 80°C. An overnight culture of P. aeruginosa PAO1 was diluted to an OD600 of 0.1 and spread onto sterile LB agar. A sterile filter disk was then placed in the center of the plate, and 10 μl of the melted plug was placed onto the disk. The plate was incubated for 24 h at 37°C with 5% CO2. After incubation, the zone of inhibition was measured and compared to a standard curve for tobramycin in LB agar to determine the concentration in the melted plug. This process was repeated at the various time points, using different plates each time.

To quantify the amount of antibiotic that might have been portioned into the biofilm, we measured both the free antibiotic concentration in the lawn and the concentration trapped in the cells and biofilm extracellular polymeric substance (EPS). Variant colony generation was performed as described above. On day 4 post-tobramycin-loaded bead placement, the plates were removed from the incubator and marked with 5 mm by 5 mm squares from the edge of the bead to the edge of the plate. The biofilm lawn overlying each of the squares was isolated using a sterile plastic loop and placed in 1 ml of sterile double-distilled H2O (ddH2O). The sample was then vortexed for 10 s before being centrifuged at 21.1 × g for 2 min. The supernatant was collected, and the pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of sterile ddH2O. The resuspended pellet was boiled at 100°C for 10 min to lyse the cells and denature proteins. An overnight culture of P. aeruginosa PAO1 was diluted to an OD600 of 0.1 and spread onto sterile LB agar. A sterile filter disk was then placed in the center of the plate, and 10 μl of either the supernatant or boiled pellet was placed onto the disk. The plate was incubated for 24 h at 37°C with 5% CO2. After incubation, the zone of inhibition was measured and compared to a standard curve for tobramycin in LB agar to determine the concentration in the respective components. Data are presented as the mean ± SD.

Population analysis profiling of background P. aeruginosa strains.To assess for the presence of heteroresistance (i.e., a small population of resistant cells that might go undetected by routine clinical antibiogram assays [20, 36]) in our background strains, we used population analysis profiling (PAP) (36). First, 20 ml of LB broth was inoculated with either P. aeruginosa PAO1 or P. aeruginosa Xen41. The cultures were incubated at 37°C with 200 rpm shaking for 24 h. After incubation, the cultures were diluted to an OD600 of 0.1 and spread onto LB agar containing a 2-fold dilution series of tobramycin. The plates were then incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 24 h. After incubation, colony growth on each plate was analyzed. If heteroresistance is present in the population, colonies should appear on the dilution plate with an 8× higher concentration than the highest noninhibitory concentration. No heteroresistance was found in our background strains (data not shown).

Effect of efflux pump inhibitor on phoenix colony emergence.To assess the role of efflux pumps in the emergence of phoenix colonies, phe-arg-β-naphthylamide (PAβN), a broad-spectrum efflux pump inhibitor (37), was used. Lawn biofilms of P. aeruginosa PAO1 were generated as described above on LB agar containing 27 μM PAβN as well as LB agar without PAβN. Tobramycin-loaded bead placement and variant colony quantification were completed as described above. The mean ± SD of the colony counts was obtained and plotted.

Heritability study of phoenix colonies.To assess whether it is possible to enrich for the phoenix colony phenotype within a population, heritability studies on phoenix colony isolates were performed. Variant colonies were generated as described above. Variant colony plates were replica plated, and all phoenix colonies were isolated and used to inoculate 20 ml of LB broth. The broth cultures were incubated for 24 h at 37°C with 200 rpm shaking. After incubation, each of the cultures was diluted to an OD600 of 0.1. Variant colonies for each isolate were again generated as before and replica plated. Isolation of phoenix colonies, overnight growth, and variant colony generation for each isolate were repeated. Data are presented as the mean ± SD.

Anaerobic chamber studies.A previous study showed the importance of alternative metabolic pathways in antimicrobial tolerance (25). In order to assess the effects of other metabolic pathways on the emergence of phoenix colonies, studies were performed in an anaerobic chamber to deprive the bacteria of oxygen. Variant colonies were generated as described above aside from incubation parameters on both LB agar plates and LB agar plates containing 100 mM KNO3. The plates were incubated at 37°C in an anaerobic chamber at all times. Inside the chamber, the plates were also placed in a sealable bag containing a paper towel soaked in water to prevent dehydration of the agar. The plates were allowed to grow for 5 days and were removed from the chamber. Biofilm lawn growth was observed on the plate and imaged by IVIS, and the plates were immediately replica plated as described above onto both LB agar and LB agar containing 5 μg/ml of tobramycin. These plates were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 in a standard aerobic incubator. After 24 h, growth on these plates was examined, and IVIS images were taken.

Eradication of planktonic tolerant, resistant, and phoenix phenotypes.The results from our replica plating studies indicate that there is a zone surrounding the antibiotic source in which everything, including persister cells, appears to be sterilized. To determine whether all cells truly could be killed with a high enough concentration of antibiotics, we performed a planktonic assay to look for the concentration at which bacterial eradication occurs. First, 100 ml of LB broth was used to prepare an overnight broth culture of P. aeruginosa PAO1. The culture was incubated at 37°C with 200 rpm of shaking for 24 h. Then, 5-ml aliquots of the overnight culture were placed into 15-ml conical tubes, and tobramycin was added to each tube in order to produce a triplicate dilution series of antibiotics at 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, and 1,000 μg/ml.

Due to the very high concentrations of tobramycin in our studies, we were concerned that there may be an osmolarity effect causing the lysing of bacteria. To control for this, a separate triplicate was prepared with 0.385 mg/ml of dextrose to produce an equivocal maximum osmolarity solution. The new cultures were then incubated for 48 h at 37°C with 200 rpm of shaking. After incubation, 1 ml of each culture was centrifuged at maximum speed for 5 min. The supernatant was then removed, and the pellet was resuspended in 200 μl of sterile LB broth. The resuspension was used to prepare a 10-fold dilution series in a 96-well plate containing sterile LB broth. Then, 5-μl aliquots were dropped onto a sterile LB agar plate. The plates were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 7 days in order to allow any dormant or slowly growing phenotypes to appear before being counted. The plates were then counted and CFU were calculated. Data are presented as the mean ± SD.

Statistical analysis.All experiments were performed in a minimum of triplicates. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was completed using GraphPad Prism version 8.2.1 for all studies, with a P value of 0.05 being considered significant. Data represented in the graphs are plotted as the mean ± SD.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported in part by the Ohio State University College of Medicine and NIH R01-GM124436 (P.S.).

We declare no conflict of interest.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 2 April 2020.
    • Returned for modification 5 May 2020.
    • Accepted 9 June 2020.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 15 June 2020.
  • Supplemental material is available online only.

  • Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Shah NB,
    2. Osmon DR,
    3. Steckelberg JM,
    4. Sierra RJ,
    5. Walker RC,
    6. Tande AJ,
    7. Berbari EF
    . 2016. Pseudomonas prosthetic joint infections: a review of 102 episodes. J Bone Jt Infect 1:25–30. doi:10.7150/jbji.15722.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Serra R,
    2. Grande R,
    3. Butrico L,
    4. Rossi A,
    5. Settimio UF,
    6. Caroleo B,
    7. Amato B,
    8. Gallelli L,
    9. de Franciscis S
    . 2015. Chronic wound infections: the role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 13:605–613. doi:10.1586/14787210.2015.1023291.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hoiby N,
    2. Ciofu O,
    3. Bjarnsholt T
    . 2010. Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in cystic fibrosis. Future Microbiol 5:1663–1674. doi:10.2217/fmb.10.125.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lewis K
    . 2008. Multidrug tolerance of biofilms and persister cells. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 322:107–131. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75418-3_6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Zavascki AP,
    2. Carvalhaes CG,
    3. Picao RC,
    4. Gales AC
    . 2010. Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii: resistance mechanisms and implications for therapy. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 8:71–93. doi:10.1586/eri.09.108.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Hall-Stoodley L,
    2. Stoodley P
    . 2005. Biofilm formation and dispersal and the transmission of human pathogens. Trends Microbiol 13:7–10. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2004.11.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Lewis K
    . 2010. Persister cells. Annu Rev Microbiol 64:357–372. doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134306.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Cross AS,
    2. Opal S,
    3. Kopecko DJ
    . 1983. Progressive increase in antibiotic resistance of Gram-negative bacterial isolates. Walter Reed Hospital, 1976 to 1980: specific analysis of gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin resistance. Arch Intern Med 143:2075–2080. doi:10.1001/archinte.1983.00350110053015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Blahova J,
    2. Kralikova K,
    3. Krcmery V, Sr,
    4. Schafer V
    . 2001. Sudden increase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa nosocomial strains with broad host range transfer of antibiotic resistance. J Chemother 13:607–610. doi:10.1179/joc.2001.13.6.607.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Zignol M,
    2. Hosseini MS,
    3. Wright A,
    4. Weezenbeek CL,
    5. Nunn P,
    6. Watt CJ,
    7. Williams BG,
    8. Dye C
    . 2006. Global incidence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 194:479–485. doi:10.1086/505877.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Keen EF, III,
    2. Robinson BJ,
    3. Hospenthal DR,
    4. Aldous WK,
    5. Wolf SE,
    6. Chung KK,
    7. Murray CK
    . 2010. Prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms recovered at a military burn center. Burns 36:819–825. doi:10.1016/j.burns.2009.10.013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Tam VH,
    2. Chang KT,
    3. Abdelraouf K,
    4. Brioso CG,
    5. Ameka M,
    6. McCaskey LA,
    7. Weston JS,
    8. Caeiro JP,
    9. Garey KW
    . 2010. Prevalence, resistance mechanisms, and susceptibility of multidrug-resistant bloodstream isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:1160–1164. doi:10.1128/AAC.01446-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Oliver A,
    2. Canton R,
    3. Campo P,
    4. Baquero F,
    5. Blazquez J
    . 2000. High frequency of hypermutable Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis lung infection. Science 288:1251–1254. doi:10.1126/science.288.5469.1251.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Gilleland LB,
    2. Gilleland HE,
    3. Gibson JA,
    4. Champlin FR
    . 1989. Adaptive resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Med Microbiol 29:41–50. doi:10.1099/00222615-29-1-41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Poole K
    . 2005. Aminoglycoside resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:479–487. doi:10.1128/AAC.49.2.479-487.2005.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Prickett MH,
    2. Hauser AR,
    3. McColley SA,
    4. Cullina J,
    5. Potter E,
    6. Powers C,
    7. Jain M
    . 2017. Aminoglycoside resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis results from convergent evolution in the mexZ gene. Thorax 72:40–47. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-208027.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Levin-Reisman I,
    2. Ronin I,
    3. Gefen O,
    4. Braniss I,
    5. Shoresh N,
    6. Balaban NQ
    . 2017. Antibiotic tolerance facilitates the evolution of resistance. Science 355:826–830. doi:10.1126/science.aaj2191.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Lewis K
    . 2007. Persister cells, dormancy and infectious disease. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:48–56. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1557.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Skiada A,
    2. Markogiannakis A,
    3. Plachouras D,
    4. Daikos GL
    . 2011. Adaptive resistance to cationic compounds in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int J Antimicrob Agents 37:187–193. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.11.019.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. He J,
    2. Jia X,
    3. Yang S,
    4. Xu X,
    5. Sun K,
    6. Li C,
    7. Yang T,
    8. Zhang L
    . 2018. Heteroresistance to carbapenems in invasive Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 51:413–421. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.10.014.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    1. Wentao Z,
    2. Lei G,
    3. Liu Y,
    4. Wang W,
    5. Song T,
    6. Fan J
    . 2017. Approach to osteomyelitis treatment with antibiotic loaded PMMA. Microb Pathog 102:42–44. doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2016.11.016.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. 22.↵
    1. Dusane DH,
    2. Diamond SM,
    3. Knecht CS,
    4. Farrar NR,
    5. Peters CW,
    6. Howlin RP,
    7. Swearingen MC,
    8. Calhoun JH,
    9. Plaut RD,
    10. Nocera TM,
    11. Granger JF,
    12. Stoodley P
    . 2017. Effects of loading concentration, blood and synovial fluid on antibiotic release and anti-biofilm activity of bone cement beads. J Control Release 248:24–32. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.01.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    1. Dusane DH,
    2. Brooks JR,
    3. Sindeldecker D,
    4. Peters CW,
    5. Li A,
    6. Farrar NR,
    7. Diamond SM,
    8. Knecht CS,
    9. Plaut RD,
    10. Delury C,
    11. Aiken SS,
    12. Laycock PA,
    13. Sullivan A,
    14. Granger JF,
    15. Stoodley P
    . 2019. Complete killing of agar lawn biofilms by systematic spacing of antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate beads. Materials 12:4052. doi:10.3390/ma12244052.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    1. Gefen O,
    2. Chekol B,
    3. Strahilevitz J,
    4. Balaban NQ
    . 2017. TDtest: easy detection of bacterial tolerance and persistence in clinical isolates by a modified disk-diffusion assay. Sci Rep 7:41284. doi:10.1038/srep41284.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Schiessl KT,
    2. Hu F,
    3. Jo J,
    4. Nazia SZ,
    5. Wang B,
    6. Price-Whelan A,
    7. Min W,
    8. Dietrich LEP
    . 2019. Phenazine production promotes antibiotic tolerance and metabolic heterogeneity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Nat Commun 10:762. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08733-w.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Hall-Stoodley L,
    2. Stoodley P
    . 2009. Evolving concepts in biofilm infections. Cell Microbiol 11:1034–1043. doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01323.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Lima J,
    2. Alves LR,
    3. Paz J,
    4. Rabelo MA,
    5. Maciel MAV,
    6. Morais M
    . 2017. Analysis of biofilm production by clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 29:310–316.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Swearingen MC,
    2. Granger JF,
    3. Sullivan A,
    4. Stoodley P
    . 2016. Elution of antibiotics from poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement after extended implantation does not necessarily clear the infection despite susceptibility of the clinical isolates. Pathog Dis 74:ftv103. doi:10.1093/femspd/ftv103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Aeschlimann JR
    . 2003. The role of multidrug efflux pumps in the antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other Gram-negative bacteria. Insights from the Society of Infectious Diseases pharmacists. Pharmacotherapy 23:916–924. doi:10.1592/phco.23.7.916.32722.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Terzi HA,
    2. Kulah C,
    3. Ciftci IH
    . 2014. The effects of active efflux pumps on antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 30:2681–2687. doi:10.1007/s11274-014-1692-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    1. Wang DD,
    2. Sun TY,
    3. Hu YJ
    . 2007. Contributions of efflux pumps to high level resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ciprofloxacin. Chin Med J (Engl) 120:68–70. doi:10.1097/00029330-200701010-00013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Howlin RP,
    2. Brayford MJ,
    3. Webb JS,
    4. Cooper JJ,
    5. Aiken SS,
    6. Stoodley P
    . 2015. Antibiotic-loaded synthetic calcium sulfate beads for prevention of bacterial colonization and biofilm formation in periprosthetic infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:111–120. doi:10.1128/AAC.03676-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Lederberg J,
    2. Lederberg EM
    . 1952. Replica plating and indirect selection of bacterial mutants. J Bacteriol 63:399–406. doi:10.1128/JB.63.3.399-406.1952.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Stefani S,
    2. Campana S,
    3. Cariani L,
    4. Carnovale V,
    5. Colombo C,
    6. Lleo MM,
    7. Iula VD,
    8. Minicucci L,
    9. Morelli P,
    10. Pizzamiglio G,
    11. Taccetti G
    . 2017. Relevance of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in cystic fibrosis. Int J Med Microbiol 307:353–362. doi:10.1016/j.ijmm.2017.07.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. 35.↵
    1. Waters V,
    2. Smyth A
    . 2015. Cystic fibrosis microbiology: advances in antimicrobial therapy. J Cyst Fibros 14:551–560. doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2015.02.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. El-Halfawy OM,
    2. Valvano MA
    . 2015. Antimicrobial heteroresistance: an emerging field in need of clarity. Clin Microbiol Rev 28:191–207. doi:10.1128/CMR.00058-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Rampioni G,
    2. Pillai CR,
    3. Longo F,
    4. Bondi R,
    5. Baldelli V,
    6. Messina M,
    7. Imperi F,
    8. Visca P,
    9. Leoni L
    . 2017. Effect of efflux pump inhibition on Pseudomonas aeruginosa transcriptome and virulence. Sci Rep 7:11392. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-11892-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Novel Aminoglycoside-Tolerant Phoenix Colony Variants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Devin Sindeldecker, Kelly Moore, Anthony Li, Daniel J. Wozniak, Matthew Anderson, Devendra H. Dusane, Paul Stoodley
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Aug 2020, 64 (9) e00623-20; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00623-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Novel Aminoglycoside-Tolerant Phoenix Colony Variants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Novel Aminoglycoside-Tolerant Phoenix Colony Variants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Devin Sindeldecker, Kelly Moore, Anthony Li, Daniel J. Wozniak, Matthew Anderson, Devendra H. Dusane, Paul Stoodley
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Aug 2020, 64 (9) e00623-20; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00623-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Pseudomonas aeruginosa
aminoglycosides
antibiotic tolerance
biofilms

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596