Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Editor's Pick Challenging Clinical Case in Antimicrobial Resistance

Imipenem plus Fosfomycin as Salvage Therapy for Vertebral Osteomyelitis

Itaru Nakamura, Tetsuo Yamaguchi, Kotaro Aoki, Yuri Miura, Satoko Sato, Hiroaki Fujita, Hidehiro Watanabe
Itaru Nakamura
aDepartment of Infection Prevention and Control, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tetsuo Yamaguchi
bDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tetsuo Yamaguchi
Kotaro Aoki
bDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kotaro Aoki
Yuri Miura
aDepartment of Infection Prevention and Control, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Satoko Sato
aDepartment of Infection Prevention and Control, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiroaki Fujita
aDepartment of Infection Prevention and Control, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hidehiro Watanabe
aDepartment of Infection Prevention and Control, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01746-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

We applied combination antibiotic therapy to treat vertebral osteomyelitis and a psoas abscess caused by glycopeptide-intermediate (MIC, 2 μg/ml) and daptomycin-nonsusceptible (>2 μg/ml) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The Etest synergy test showed the largest synergistic effects for imipenem/cilastatin and fosfomycin. Whole-gene sequencing showed amino acid changes in SA0802, SA1193 (mprF), and SA1531 (ald). Four weeks of combination treatment using imipenem/cilastatin (1.5 g per day) and fosfomycin (4.0 g per day) resulted in clinical improvement.

This Journal section presents a real, challenging case involving a multidrug-resistant organism. The case authors present the rationale for their therapeutic strategy and discuss the impact of mechanisms of resistance on clinical outcome. An expert clinician then provides a commentary on the case.

INTRODUCTION

Vancomycin (VAN) and daptomycin (DAP) have been widely used as preferred treatments for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections (1). However, the effectiveness of these treatments is often not ideal, and the mortality of MRSA-mediated bacteremia ranges from approximately 20% to 60% (2, 3). Additionally, emerging resistance against these key MRSA drugs has already been reported (1, 4–6). Therefore, we must develop additional drug treatment options for cases associated with MRSA strains that present reduced antibiotic treatment efficacy.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 84-year-old male, with chronic kidney disease, type II diabetes mellitus, and chronic heart failure associated with mitral stenosis presented with fever, backache, and walking difficulties that lasted for 4 days. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on admission showed L2-3 vertebral osteomyelitis and a bilateral psoas abscess, and the blood culture was positive for MRSA. Transthoracic echocardiography indicated no findings of vegetation; however, transesophageal echocardiography was not performed. Two weeks of VAN treatment for MRSA osteomyelitis was started, followed by 2 weeks of DAP treatment. The MIC of VAN for the MRSA isolates derived from the blood culture at this time was determined to be 1 μg/ml, whereas the MIC of DAP was not measured. The patient was transferred to Tokyo Medical University Hospital (TMUH, Tokyo, Japan) because blood cultures remained MRSA positive for 1 month and the psoas abscess deteriorated. Upon his arrival at TMUH, computed tomography (CT)-assisted drainage of the psoas abscess was performed because both blood cultures and the psoas abscess remained MRSA positive. The MICs for the isolates from the psoas abscess (TUM19798) and the blood culture (TUM19799) were determined and are shown in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 1

MICs for TUM19798 and TUM 19799

We switched to high-dose VAN treatment, combined with CT-assisted drainage, with a trough concentration of 15.0 to 20.0 μg/ml due to DAP resistance in the blood culture isolate. However, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels fluctuated, with high positive values ranging from 6.5 to 10.5 mg/dl, despite becoming negative in blood cultures on day 3 after transfer to TMUH. The treatment timeline can be summarized as 2 weeks of VAN and 2 weeks of DAP, administered at the previous hospital, followed by 4 weeks of high-dose VAN combined with abscess drainage, performed at TMUH. Despite 8 total weeks of antibiotic treatment and pus drainage, enhanced CT revealed no improvements in the remaining abscess or vertebral osteomyelitis. The CRP value was 8.4 mg/dl. Additionally, pus from the second CT-assisted drainage remained MRSA positive. Although we considered performing a more invasive surgical intervention, the patient was deemed to have a low tolerance for such intervention. We considered other antibiotic treatment regimens and the discontinuation of VAN treatment.

CHALLENGE QUESTION

What is the next option without progressing to a more invasive surgical intervention?

  • A. High-dose DAP

  • B. Linezolid

  • C. Fosfomycin

  • D. Imipenem

  • E. Antibiotic combination of fosfomycin and imipenem

TREATMENT AND OUTCOME

We selected a combination treatment of imipenem/cilastatin (IPM/CS, 1.5 g per day) and fosfomycin (FOF, 4.0 g per day), based on the results of the Etest synergy test, withdrawing VAN treatment. Despite existing reports regarding the efficacy of various antibiotic combinations and because the methods for selecting ideal antibiotic combination regimens can be time-consuming, determining significant treatments can be difficult in the clinical setting. The effectiveness of each potential combination regimen depends on the response of specific MRSA isolates, which makes determining optimal antibiotic regimens difficult. The Etest synergy test has been reported to represent a practical method for assessing the efficacy of antibiotic combination regimens, without requiring the performance of time-consuming techniques (7, 8). The Etest synergy test is a prediffusion technique, in which the first or second Etest strip is removed after 1 h and replaced directly with the second or third strip (7, 8). Each Etest strip was placed so that the positions of the MICs of the drugs, which were measured a priori, overlapped.

Etest synergy tests were carried out using FOF, IPM/CS, DAP, VAN, and linezolid (LZD), in the following combinations: IPM/CS+FOF, IPM/CS+VAN, FOF+VAN, IPM/CS+DAP, FOF+DAP, IPM/CS+LZD, FOF+LZD, IPM/CS+FOF+VAN, IPM/CS+FOF+DAP, and IPM/CS+FOF+LZD. The combination effects were measured based on the distance (in millimeters) from the MIC line to the reference point. If a combination has no effect, the reference point and the MIC of each antibiotic agent will be the same, and the distance will be 0 mm. The distance of each combination regimen was evaluated to determine the effect size of each combination.

The MICs of the drugs indicated that TUM19799 was more likely to be resistant than TUM19798; therefore, an Etest synergy test was performed for TUM19799. The results of the Etest synergy test (Table 2) suggested that triple antibiotic combination regimens would be effective; however, the risks of side effects increase as the number of antibiotic agents increase. The MICs of the last antibiotic agents (in micrograms per milliliter) and the largest distances from the reference point (in millimeters) were observed for the following combinations: IPM+FOF (MIC of last antibiotic agent/distance = 0.38/8), IPM+FOF+LZD (0.38/7), IPM+FOF+VAN (0.75/6), and IPM+FOF+DAP (0.75/6); these results indicated that these combinations were more effective than any single drug and all other combination regimens.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 2

MICs of the last antibiotic agent and distance between a reference point, equidistant from each MIC, and the last inhibitory line

Two weeks after the initial administration of IPM/CS and FOF, the abscess improved dramatically, and CRP values fell within the normal range, with the lowest value reported at 0.18 mg/dl. CT showed improvement of the psoas abscess, which almost disappeared. However, despite 4 weeks of successful combination therapy, the patient died of end-stage heart failure.

To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the differences in antimicrobial susceptibility between isolates, TUM19798 and TUM19799 were subjected to whole-genome sequencing using MiSeq (Illumina, Inc., CA, USA) and MinION (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK), as previously described (9). Furthermore, the MiSeq reads from TUM19799 were mapped to the complete genome sequence of TUM19798, and mutations in each isolate were identified using CLC Genomics Workbench software (Qiagen). Pathogen protocols were approved by the Toho University Safety Committee for Pathogens (approval number 20-53-102).

The sequence type of each strain was ST1/SCCmec type IVa, and the spa type was t1784. The virulence genes detected were lukD, lukE, sea, seh, sek, seq, and cna. We detected several acquired resistance genes, including blaZ, mecA, ant(9)-Ia, and erm(A), and we detected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in grlA (S80F and E84G) and gyrA (S84L). The acquired resistance genes and the SNPs resulted in resistance to β-lactams, aminoglycosides, macrolides, and quinolones. Compared to a reference S. aureus strain, MW2, two SNPs were identified in genes associated with VAN resistance, which resulted in the nonsynonymous substitutions Ile8Thr, located in prsA, and Ala8Thr, located in sigB. No SNPs were identified in genes associated with LZD or FOF resistance. The comparison between TUM19798 and TUM19799 showed highly similar overall genomic structures, with only eight distinguishing SNPs identified in the whole-genome sequences. Three detected SNPs were associated with the nonsynonymous substitutions Glu344Lys, Leu341Ser, and Asp47Gly, located in SA0802, mprF, and ald, respectively (Table 3). SNPs in mprF have previously been shown to affect the resistance of MRSA to DAP (4–6). Mutations in mprF can confer reduced susceptibility not only to exogenously administered DAP but also to endogenous cationic antimicrobial peptides; therefore, these mutations can potentially be selected without DAP selection pressure (10).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 3

Mutations according to comparisons between whole-genome sequence mapping results and N315 (NC_002745)

The sequencing data for TUM19798 and TUM19798 were deposited in the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ), under BioProject accession number PRJDB10142.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Lisa Giles of Cambridge Proofreading, LLC, for editing a draft of the manuscript.

We declare that we have no competing interests.

The study received no external funding.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 13 August 2020.
    • Returned for modification 2 September 2020.
    • Accepted 12 September 2020.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 21 September 2020.
  • For the case commentary, see https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02039-20.

  • Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Liu C,
    2. Bayer A,
    3. Cosgrove SE,
    4. Daum RS,
    5. Fridkin SK,
    6. Gorwitz RJ,
    7. Kaplan SL,
    8. Karchmer AW,
    9. Levine DP,
    10. Murray BE,
    11. J Rybak M,
    12. Talan DA,
    13. Chambers HF
    , Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2011. Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children. Clin Infect Dis 52:e18–e55. doi:10.1093/cid/ciq146.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Blot SI,
    2. Vandewoude KH,
    3. Hoste EA,
    4. Colardyn FA
    . 2002. Outcome and attributable mortality in critically ill patients with bacteremia involving methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Arch Intern Med 162:2229–2235. doi:10.1001/archinte.162.19.2229.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Miro JM,
    2. Anguera I,
    3. Cabell CH,
    4. Chen AY,
    5. Stafford JA,
    6. Corey GR,
    7. Olaison L,
    8. Eykyn S,
    9. Hoen B,
    10. Abrutyn E,
    11. Raoult D,
    12. Bayer A,
    13. Fowler VG
    , International Collaboration on Endocarditis Merged Database Study Group. 2005. Staphylococcus aureus native valve infective endocarditis: report of 566 episodes from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis Merged Database. Clin Infect Dis 41:507–514. doi:10.1086/431979.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Tsukimori A,
    2. Nakamura I,
    3. Okamura S,
    4. Sato A,
    5. Fukushima S,
    6. Mizuno Y,
    7. Yamaguchi T,
    8. Matsumoto T
    . 2014. First case report of vancomycin-intermediate sequence type 72 Staphylococcus aureus with nonsusceptibility to daptomycin. BMC Infect Dis 14:459. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-459.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Yamaguchi T,
    2. Suzuki S,
    3. Okamura S,
    4. Miura Y,
    5. Tsukimori A,
    6. Nakamura I,
    7. Ito N,
    8. Masuya A,
    9. Shiina T,
    10. Matsumoto T
    . 2015. Evolution and single-nucleotide polymorphisms in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin and daptomycin, based on determination of the complete genome. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:3585–3587. doi:10.1128/AAC.05159-14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Gasch O,
    2. Camoez M,
    3. Domínguez MA,
    4. Padilla B,
    5. Pintado V,
    6. Almirante B,
    7. Martín C,
    8. López-Medrano F,
    9. de Gopegui ER,
    10. Blanco JR,
    11. García-Pardo G,
    12. Calbo E,
    13. Montero M,
    14. Granados A,
    15. Jover A,
    16. Dueñas C,
    17. Pujol M
    , REIPI/GEIH Study Groups, et al. 2014. Emergence of resistance to daptomycin in a cohort of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus persistent bacteraemia treated with daptomycin. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:568–571. doi:10.1093/jac/dkt396.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Pankey GA,
    2. Ashcraft DS
    . 2005. In vitro synergy of ciprofloxacin and gatifloxacin against ciprofloxacin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:2959–2964. doi:10.1128/AAC.49.7.2959-2964.2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Nakamura I,
    2. Sakamoto N,
    3. Ida Y,
    4. Imai R,
    5. Aoki K,
    6. Ando R,
    7. Yamaguchi T,
    8. Matsumura H,
    9. Matsumoto T
    . 2015. Combination therapy against polymicrobial infection, including by NDM-1-producing Enterobacteriaceae resistant to colistin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:5092–5093. doi:10.1128/AAC.00746-15.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Harada S,
    2. Aoki K,
    3. Okamoto K,
    4. Kinoshita O,
    5. Nawata K,
    6. Ishii Y,
    7. Tateda K,
    8. Sasaki M,
    9. Saga T,
    10. Doi Y,
    11. Yotsuyanagi H,
    12. Moriya K,
    13. Ono M
    . 2019. Left ventricular assist device-associated endocarditis involving multiple clones of Staphylococcus aureus with distinct antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. Int J Infect Dis 84:44–47. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2019.05.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Mishra NN,
    2. Yang SJ,
    3. Chen L,
    4. Muller C,
    5. Saleh-Mghir A,
    6. Kuhn S,
    7. Peschel A,
    8. Yeaman MR,
    9. Nast CC,
    10. Kreiswirth BN,
    11. Crémieux AC,
    12. Bayer AS
    . 2013. Emergence of daptomycin resistance in daptomycin-naïve rabbits with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infection is associated with resistance to host defense cationic peptides and mprF polymorphisms. PLoS One 8:e71151. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071151.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Imipenem plus Fosfomycin as Salvage Therapy for Vertebral Osteomyelitis
Itaru Nakamura, Tetsuo Yamaguchi, Kotaro Aoki, Yuri Miura, Satoko Sato, Hiroaki Fujita, Hidehiro Watanabe
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Dec 2020, 65 (1) e01746-20; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01746-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Imipenem plus Fosfomycin as Salvage Therapy for Vertebral Osteomyelitis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Imipenem plus Fosfomycin as Salvage Therapy for Vertebral Osteomyelitis
Itaru Nakamura, Tetsuo Yamaguchi, Kotaro Aoki, Yuri Miura, Satoko Sato, Hiroaki Fujita, Hidehiro Watanabe
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Dec 2020, 65 (1) e01746-20; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01746-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • CASE PRESENTATION
    • CHALLENGE QUESTION
    • TREATMENT AND OUTCOME
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

antibiotic combination
fosfomycin
imipenem
Etest synergy test
whole genome analysis

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596