Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Susceptibility

Development and Validation of an In Vitro Resazurin-Based Susceptibility Assay against Madurella mycetomatis

S. O. Abd Algaffar, A. Verbon, W. W. J. van de Sande, S. A. Khalid
S. O. Abd Algaffar
aFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Science & Technology, Omdurman, Sudan
bDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. O. Abd Algaffar
A. Verbon
bDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. W. J. van de Sande
bDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for W. W. J. van de Sande
S. A. Khalid
aFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Science & Technology, Omdurman, Sudan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. A. Khalid
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01338-20
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

We present an in vitro susceptibility assay for Madurella mycetomatis hyphae using resazurin for endpoint reading. Using this assay, reproducible MICs were obtained for amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, terbinafine, and micafungin. Results were comparable with those of a 2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide salt (XTT)-based susceptibility assay. The lowest MICs were obtained for itraconazole and posaconazole (MIC50, 0.016 µg/ml) followed by voriconazole (MIC50, 0.063 µg/ml). Amphotericin B, micafungin, and terbinafine appeared much less effective.

INTRODUCTION

Madurella mycetomatis is the most common causative agent of eumycetoma. Unfortunately, none of the antifungals currently available for use seem to be therapeutically effective in eumycetoma caused by M. mycetomatis infection. Antifungal therapy always needs to be combined with drastic surgical procedures (1). Therefore, a need to identify novel antifungal agents against M. mycetomatis infection and in vitro susceptibility assays are needed.

Previously, an in vitro susceptibility assay for M. mycetomatis isolates was published. In that assay, 2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide salt (XTT) was used as a viability dye to quantify growth after 7 days of incubation (2). However, the readily soluble, cell permeable, and nontoxic redox indicator resazurin is a viability dye that offers extra advantages in terms of its fast and exact visual endpoint determination (3, 4). Resazurin is nontoxic to cells, even after prolonged incubation with slow-growing fungi like mycetoma. The half-life of the reduced resazurin (resorufin) is ∼10 days (4). Thus, resazurin can be added at the start of the in vitro susceptibility assay. Visual endpoint reading using resazurin was possible from the 4th day of incubation. Furthermore, resazurin costs less than XTT, which is a paramount advantage in countries of endemicity.

To validate the performance of the newly developed resazurin-based microdilution assay, the susceptibility of 10 M. mycetomatis isolates from different geographic origins toward six structurally diverse antifungal compounds representing the polyenes (amphotericin B, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Woerden, The Netherlands), triazoles (itraconazole, Janssen Pharmaceutical Products, Beerse, Belgium; posaconazole, Schering-low, Kenilworth, NJ; and voriconazole, Pfizer BV, Capelle aan de Ijsel, The Netherlands), echinocandins (micafungin, Astellas Pharma, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands), and allylamines (terbinafine, Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland) was determined. Resazurin-based results were compared with those obtained with the XTT assay published previously (2). Assays were performed in triplicate. In both in vitro susceptibility assays, drugs were dissolved in sterile dimethyl sulfoxide (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Concentration ranges were as follows: 0.125 to 8 µg/ml for amphotericin B; 0.016 to 1 µg/ml for itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole; 2 to 128 µg/ml for micafungin; and 0.5 to 32 µg/ml for terbinafine. An M. mycetomatis inoculum was prepared in RPMI 1640 medium containing 0.35 g/liter l-glutamine and 1.98 mM 4-morpholinepropane sulfonic acid (5) by sonicating M. mycetomatis mycelia for 10 seconds at 28 µm maximum power (Sonirep 150, Beune de Ronde). After 7 days incubation at 37°C, the mycelia were centrifuged for 5 min at 2,628 × g (Rotana 460R, Hettich Zentrifuger, Germany). The medium was poured off, and fresh medium was added. The mycelia were again sonicated for 10 seconds at 28 µm maximum power and adjusted to transmission of 35% to 45% at 660 nm (WPA S800+, Biochrom, UK). A 100-µl standardized hyphal suspension was added to each well of a round-bottom 96-well plate (Greiner Bio-one, The Netherlands) along with 1 µl of the antifungal agent and 1 µl of resazurin solution (0.15 mg/ml). A growth control and a negative control were included. After being added, the readily soluble resazurin formed a deep blue solution. The plates were then sealed and incubated at 37°C for 7 days. During growth, resazurin is transformed into pink fluorescent resorufin in viable metabolically bioactive fungal cells. The quantity of resorufin produced is proportional to the number of viable cells and can be assessed spectrophotometrically or visually without the use of specialized equipment (3). Therefore, the MICs obtained by resazurin assay were determined visually as the first blue/purple well for each agent from the 4th day of incubation. For spectrophotometric endpoints, on the 7th day of incubation, 100 µl of the supernatant was transferred to flat-bottom 96-well plates (Greiner Bio-one). Absorbance was measured at 600 nm using a microplate reader (Epoch 2, Biotek, USA), and the MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of antifungal agent resulting in >80% reduction of viable fungal mass. Percentages of growth inhibition for resazurin and XTT were calculated using the following equations, respectively: percent growth inhibition = 100 − (OD600 NC − OD600 test/OD600 NC − OD600 GC) × 100, and percent growth inhibition = 100 − (OD450 test − OD450 NC OD450 GC − OD450 NC) × 100, where OD600 and OD450 are optical density at 600 and 450 nm, respectively.

As seen in Fig. 1, similar growth patterns were observed for strain CBS131320 with both XTT and resazurin. The first concentration of antifungal agent in which a growth reduction of >80% was observed was considered the MIC (Fig. 1). For strain CBS13120, this was 4 µg/ml for amphotericin B (Fig. 1A), 0.125 µg/ml for itraconazole (Fig. 1B), >32 µg/ml for terbinafine (Fig. 1C), and >128 µg/ml for micafungin (Fig. 1D) using either resazurin or XTT as the viability dye. Employing the newly developed resazurin assay showed a concentration-dependent pattern of antifungal activity for different classes of antifungal agents.

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Percent growth of four classes of antifungal agents employing resazurin (RZ) and XTT assays in testing Madurella mycetomatis CBS131320 isolate. (A) Percent growth obtained with XTT and resazurin for amphotericin B. At 4 µg/ml, the percent growth for both resazurin and XTT is below the 20% cutoff line. This is the MIC for this particular isolate. (B) Percent growth for itraconazole. At 0.125 µg/ml, the percent growth for both resazurin and XTT is below the 20% cutoff line. This is the MIC for itraconazole for this particular isolate. (C, D) Percent growth for terbinafine and micafungin. For both drugs, the growth percentages obtained with XTT and resazurin were never below the 20% cutoff line, and no MIC was obtained at the concentrations tested.

The MICs of the different antifungals used were variable and dependent on the M. mycetomatis isolate. The lowest MIC50s were obtained for the azoles, itraconazole, and posaconazole, followed by voriconazole (Table 1). Higher MIC50s were obtained for amphotericin, terbinafine, and micafungin. The MICs reported here were comparable with those reported for itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole (2, 5–10). Apparently, inhibition of ergosterol synthesis in M. mycetomatis isolates by either the azole class of antifungal agents or terbinafine offers the best mechanism by which to inhibit M. mycetomatis growth (5, 6). Because there are currently no breakpoints established for M. mycetomatis for any of the antifungal agents tested, the absolute value of the MIC is not indicative of therapeutic success or failure (11–13). As reported in other studies, we found higher MICs for terbinafine (6). However, the performance of terbinafine seemed clinically similar to that of itraconazole. Out of the 68 black-grain eumycetoma cases in Senegal treated with terbinafine and surgery, 20 recovered, 2 had a recurrence, 14 were lost to follow-up, and 32 were still on treatment (12). Based on the 22 patients for whom data were available until the end of treatment, this resulted in a cure rate of 90.9%, which, although lower than the 100% cure rate observed in the same study for itraconazole, was still comparable (12). Amphotericin B appeared to be less effective than azoles at inhibiting M. mycetomatis infection than previously reported (2). It has already been proven that amphotericin B has no promising therapeutic response (14). Apparently, the M. mycetomatis isolates tested were resistant to micafungin, in agreement with earlier studies (7).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
TABLE 1

MIC distribution for M. mycetomatis isolates and reproducibility and accuracy of the resazurin assay versus the XTT assay

The assay proved to be reproducible with high percent agreements (Table 1). The percent agreement was determined by calculating the percent readings with ≤1 dilution step difference between the MICs obtained with different methods. The percent agreement between the visual endpoint reading and the spectrophotometric endpoint reading of the resazurin assay ranged between 77.9% and 100%, indicating that visual endpoint reading would be sufficient when spectrophotometric reading of the endpoints is not available (Table 1). To further assess the reproducibility of this assay, a multicenter study should be performed to assess a larger number of genetically diverse isolates.

Our results indicate that resazurin is a good viability dye to be used in in vitro susceptibility assays for M. mycetomatis infection. Our in vitro susceptibility assay is flexible and can be used to test the antifungal activity of any compound and thus for drug discovery, making this assay more flexible than the commercially available Sensititre YeastOne assay (15), which uses the resazurin derivative alamarBlue for visualization. Unfortunately, the YeastOne assay is only available in premade plates consisting of premade concentration lines for standard antifungals, whereas our assay can be used with any compound of interest.

In conclusion, in vitro susceptibility assays for M. mycetomatis based on resazurin as a viability dye offers an extra advantage of visual endpoint reading without resorting to spectrophotometric measurements. The aforementioned advantage coupled with the use of the less costly resazurin, as well as the flexibility with homemade plate layouts, would be an advanced step forward for in vitro susceptibility testing against M. mycetomatis compared with MTT, especially in endemic settings.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 25 June 2020.
    • Returned for modification 2 August 2020.
    • Accepted 5 November 2020.
    • Accepted manuscript posted online 14 December 2020.
  • Copyright © 2021 Abd Algaffar et al.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ahmed SA,
    2. Kloezen W,
    3. Duncanson F,
    4. Zijlstra EE,
    5. de Hoog GS,
    6. Fahal AH,
    7. van de Sande WW
    . 2014. Madurella mycetomatis is highly susceptible to ravuconazole. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8:e2942. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002942.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ahmed AO,
    2. van de Sande WW,
    3. van Vianen W,
    4. van Belkum A,
    5. Fahal AH,
    6. Verbrugh HA,
    7. Bakker-Woudenberg IA
    . 2004. In vitro susceptibilities of Madurella mycetomatis to itraconazole and amphotericin B assessed by a modified NCCLS method and a viability-based 2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-5-[(phenylamino)carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium hydroxide (XTT) assay. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:2742–2746. doi:10.1128/AAC.48.7.2742-2746.2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Riss TL,
    2. Moravec RA,
    3. Niles AL,
    4. Duellman S
    , Benink HA, Worzella TJ, Minor L. 2004. Cell viability assays. 2013 May 1 [updated 2016 Jul 1]. In Markossian S, Sittampalam GS, Grossman A, Brimacombe K, Arkin M, Auld D, Austin CP, Baell J, Caaveiro JMM, Chung TDY, Coussens NP, Dahlin JL, Devanaryan V, Foley TL, Glicksman M, Hall MD, Haas JV, Hoare SRJ, Inglese J, Iversen PW, Kahl SD, Kales SC, Kirshner S, Lal-Nag M, Li Z, McGee J, McManus O, Riss T, Saradjian P, Trask OJ, Jr, Weidner JR, Wildey MJ, Xia M, Xu X (ed), Assay guidance manual [Internet]. Eli Lilly & Company and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Bethesda, MD.
  4. 4.↵
    1. O’Brien J,
    2. Wilson I,
    3. Orton T,
    4. Pognan FE
    . 2000. Investigation of the Alamar Blue (resazurin) fluorescent dye for the assessment of mammalian cell cytotoxicity. Eur J Biochem 267:5421–5426. doi:10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01606.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. van de Sande WW,
    2. Luijendijk A,
    3. Ahmed AO,
    4. Bakker-Woudenberg IA,
    5. van Belkum A
    . 2005. Testing of the in vitro susceptibilities of Madurella mycetomatis to six antifungal agents by using the Sensititre system in comparison with a viability-based 2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-5-[(phenylamino)carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium hydroxide (XTT) assay and a modified NCCLS method. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:1364–1368. doi:10.1128/AAC.49.4.1364-1368.2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. van Belkum A,
    2. Fahal AH,
    3. van de Sande WW
    . 2011. In vitro susceptibility of Madurella mycetomatis to posaconazole and terbinafine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:1771–1773. doi:10.1128/AAC.01045-10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. van de Sande WWJ,
    2. Fahal AH,
    3. Bakker-Woudenberg IAJM,
    4. van Belkum A
    . 2010. Madurella mycetomatis is not susceptible to the echinocandin class of antifungal agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:2738–2740. doi:10.1128/AAC.01546-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Lacroix C,
    2. de Kerviler E,
    3. Morel P,
    4. Derouin F,
    5. Feuilhade de Chavin M
    . 2005. Madurella mycetomatis mycetoma treated successfully with oral voriconazole. Br J Dermatol 152:1067–1068. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06534.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Loulergue P,
    2. Hot A,
    3. Dannaoui E,
    4. Dallot A,
    5. Poirée S,
    6. Dupont B,
    7. Lortholary O
    . 2006. Short report: successful treatment of black-grain mycetoma with voriconazole. Am J Trop Med Hyg 75:1106–1107. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2006.75.1106.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Negroni R,
    2. Tobón A,
    3. Bustamante B,
    4. Shikanai-Yasuda MA,
    5. Patino H,
    6. Restrepo A
    . 2005. Posaconazole treatment of refractory eumycetoma and chromoblastomycosis. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 47:339–346. doi:10.1590/s0036-46652005000600006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Zijlstra EE,
    2. van de Sande WWJ,
    3. Welsh O,
    4. Mahgoub ES,
    5. Goodfellow M,
    6. Fahal AH
    . 2016. Mycetoma: a unique neglected tropical disease. Lancet Infect Dis 16:100–112. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00359-X.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. Sow D,
    2. Ndiaye M,
    3. Sarr L,
    4. Kante MD,
    5. Ly F,
    6. Diousse P,
    7. Faye BT,
    8. Gaye AM,
    9. Sokhna C,
    10. Ranque S,
    11. Babacar Faye B
    . 2020. Mycetoma epidemiology, diagnosis management, and outcome in three hospital centers in Senegal from 2008 to 2018. PLoS One 15:e0231871. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231871.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    1. Calderon R,
    2. Sun N,
    3. Gay-Andrieu F,
    4. Groutas W,
    5. Weerawarna P,
    6. Prasad S,
    7. Alex D,
    8. Li D
    . 2014. Antifungal drug discovery: the process and outcomes. Future Microbiol 9:791–805. doi:10.2217/fmb.14.32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Welsh O,
    2. Salinas MC,
    3. Rodríguez MA
    . 1995. Treatment of eumycetoma and actinomycetoma. Curr Top Med Mycol 6:47–71.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Nyuykonge B,
    2. Croughs PD,
    3. Fahal AH,
    4. Verbon A,
    5. van de Sande WWJ
    . 2019. Pyomelanin secretion in Madurella mycetomatis interferes with spectrophotometric endpoint reading using the Sensititre YeastOne alamarBlue assay but not with visual endpoint reading. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e01848-20. doi:10.1128/AAC.01532-19.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Development and Validation of an In Vitro Resazurin-Based Susceptibility Assay against Madurella mycetomatis
S. O. Abd Algaffar, A. Verbon, W. W. J. van de Sande, S. A. Khalid
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Feb 2021, 65 (3) e01338-20; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01338-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Development and Validation of an In Vitro Resazurin-Based Susceptibility Assay against Madurella mycetomatis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Development and Validation of an In Vitro Resazurin-Based Susceptibility Assay against Madurella mycetomatis
S. O. Abd Algaffar, A. Verbon, W. W. J. van de Sande, S. A. Khalid
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Feb 2021, 65 (3) e01338-20; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01338-20
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

MIC
amphotericin B
In vitro susceptibility
itraconazole
Madurella mycetomatis
mycetoma
resazurin
terbinafine
XTT

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596