Immunoactivating Peptide P4 Augments Alveolar Macrophage Phagocytosis in Two Diverse Human Populations

New treatment strategies are urgently needed to overcome early mortality in acute bacterial infections. Previous studies have shown that administration of a novel immunoactivating peptide (P4) alongside passive immunotherapy prevents the onset of septicemia and rescues mice from lethal invasive disease models of pneumococcal pneumonia and sepsis. In this study, using two diverse populations of adult volunteers, we determined whether P4 treatment of human alveolar macrophages would upregulate phagocytic killing of Streptococcus pneumoniae ex vivo. We also measured macrophage intracellular oxidation, cytokine secretion, and surface marker expression following stimulation. Peptide treatment showed enhanced bacterial killing in the absence of nonspecific inflammation, consistent with therapeutic potential. This is the first demonstration of P4 efficacy on ex vivo-derived human lung cells.

T he rate of early mortality from severe pneumonia and sepsis is high in developed and developing countries. Antibiotic treatment alone is inadequate for severe infections, as treatment has not been shown to reduce deaths that occur in the initial 48-hour period following admission (1). To bridge this treatment window, augmented passive immunotherapy (API) is a potential new treatment paradigm that uses the concurrent administration of an immunoactivating peptide (P4) to enhance phagocytosis with pathogen-specific antibodies in pooled immunoglobulin (IVIG). P4 is a 28-amino-acid (aa) peptide derived from the functional site of the Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumococcal surface adhesion A protein (PsaA) (2). Murine models of acute infection have demonstrated the therapeutic benefits of API administered by either intranasal or intravenous routes. Such treatment has been demonstrated to rescue mice from invasive pneumonia (3,4), influenza-pneumonia coinfections (5), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (6), independent of age (7) and strain background (8), although to date there are no data from human lung samples. Since P4 peptide treatment of Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus)-infected murine lungs prevented the onset of sepsis and subsequent host mortality (4), we hypothesized that ex vivo P4 treatment of human alveolar macrophages would lead to enhanced phagocytic function with no or limited generalized inflammation.
To test this hypothesis, healthy adult volunteers were recruited to a study in Liverpool (United Kingdom) and Blantyre (Malawi) involving bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Ethical approval was obtained from the National Health Service Research Ethics Committee (11/NW/0011) and the Malawi College of Medicine Ethics committee (P.03/11/1063). The median age of United Kingdom volunteers was 25.6 years Ϯ 9.5 (8 females, 6 males) and that of Malawian volunteers was 31.4 years Ϯ 3.3 (11 females, 2 males). Alveolar macrophages were isolated from BAL fluid collected during bronchoscopy by adherence and washing steps, resulting in Ͼ95% alveolar macrophage purity. An opsonophagocytosis killing assay (OPKA) was then performed as previously described (3) with minor modifications. Briefly, 1 ϫ 10 5 macrophages were allowed to phagocytose IVIG-opsonized Streptococcus pneumoniae strain D39-ST2 (IVIG final dilution, 1:32; multiplicity of infection, 1:100) in the presence of complement for 2 h. P4 peptide solution (10 l of 1 mg/ml solution) was added to the OPKA mixture following the preopsonization stage, and CFU were cultured from supernatants following a 2-h incubation. A bacterial killing index was established by comparing the number of pneumococci recovered after OPKA to the number of pneumococci added. In some reactions, Fc␥ receptors were occupied using human IgG prior to OPKAs to assess the involvement of Fc␥ receptors during P4-augmented phagocytosis. In line with previous data on murine macrophages (4), peptide stimulation of human alveolar macrophages led to significantly enhanced bacterial killing in both the United Kingdom (40.1% killing for control versus 68.2% killing for P4 treated; P Ͻ 0.001, analysis of variance [ANOVA]; n ϭ 14 volunteers) and Malawian (35.8% killing for control versus 47.6% for P4 treated; P Ͻ 0.01, ANOVA; n ϭ 13 volunteers) populations (Fig. 1A). In contrast, phagocytosis in the absence of antibody or complement was reduced to 10.8% or 20.1%, respectively, and no detectable differences between stimulated and nonstimulated groups were seen (n ϭ 6; United Kingdom population). Similarly, macrophages in which Fc␥ receptors were occupied following stimulation showed reduced phagocytosis (23.3%), and no detectable differences between stimulated and nonstimulated groups were seen (Fig. 1B). There is therefore a necessity for all components involved in phagocytosis (immunoglobulin, complement, phagocytic receptors) to be present for P4 treatment to be effective.
Alveolar macrophages respond to stimuli and infection with increased oxidative metabolism. We assessed whether peptide treatment would alter intracellular oxidation in the presence and absence of immune complexes using a technique previously described (9). Briefly, alveolar macrophages were first incubated with 2=,7=-dichlorofluorescein-diacetate (DCFH-DA), followed by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (100 g/ml solution; Sigma, United Kingdom) or P4 solution (10 l of 1 mg/ml solution). Intracellular oxidation was then measured using a microplate reader (BMG Labtech, United Kingdom). The assay was also performed with opsonized pneumococci to measure intracellular oxidation in response to P4-mediated phagocytosis. P4 treatment of alveolar macrophages exposed to opsonized bacteria and complement (n ϭ 6; United Kingdom population) led to a significant increase in fluorescence (oxidation) compared to that of the control (135% for the treated versus 81% for the control at 140 min; P Ͻ 0.05, ANOVA; n ϭ 6) (Fig. 1C). Direct stimulation of alveolar macrophages by P4 peptide in the absence of an immune complex, however, showed no statistical difference (102% for treated versus 84% for control at 160 min; P ϭ 0.30, ANOVA) (Fig. 1D). Direct stimulation with LPS alone, in comparison, significantly increased intracellular macrophage oxidation compared to that of nontreated control cells (139% for LPS treated versus 84% for control at 160 min; P Ͻ 0.05, ANOVA). In addition, using detergent to burst open cells following OPKA, we found Ͻ2% of the inoculum intracellularly, with no significant difference between stimulated and unstimulated control macrophages (data not shown). These data together suggest that peptide stimulation also leads to effective breakdown of internalized pneumococci.
Previous work has shown that targeting effector cells during pneumonia via direct peptide administration to affected lungs enhances the clearance of infection and prevents the onset of septicemia (4). During pneumonia, neutrophils and alveolar macrophages are the predominant responding phagocytes. We have previously shown that human peripheral blood neutrophil phagocytosis is augmented following peptide stimulation (3), and here we present the first data showing human alveolar macrophages, critical to lung defense, responding to peptide stimulation. In this study, alveolar macrophages from both United Kingdom and Malawian volunteers showed a significant increase in bacterial killing and intracellular oxidation as a result of peptide treatment. Two diverse human populations with different levels of susceptibility to pneumococcal disease were deliberately compared. United Kingdom adults of the age recruited have a low incidence of pneumonia (Ͻ1/1,000/year) and pneumococcal carriage (Ͻ10%), but in Malawi, disease incidence is significantly higher, due to greater exposure and risk factors, including malnutrition, smoke exposure, and concurrent infections (10).
In summary, we have shown that P4 peptide treatment of human alveolar macrophages led to a significant increase in their ability to phagocytose opsonized pneumococci. Importantly, we show P4 efficacy in two diverse human populations with differing levels of susceptibility to pneumococcal disease. These data are consistent with rescue from pneumonia and sepsis, as demonstrated in murine models. Our findings are important, as early treatment options for severe sepsis are urgently needed, and API offers a new paradigm for treatment of invasive diseases such as sepsis. As API is an antibody-driven treatment, in the presence of effective opsonization, peptide stimulation will lead to enhanced phagocytosis irrespective of the pathogen. Opsonization occurs through the broad specificity of IVIG, and the formed immune complexes are effectively cleared through the effects of peptide stimulation (including modulation of phagocytic Fc␥ receptors) on phagocytes (4,5). This has the potential to rapidly assist an infected patient prior to diagnostic results and antibiotic efficacy. We envisage P4 and immunoglobulin administration as part of an adjunct therapy with antibiotic treatment, a strategy that has previously been shown to rescue mice with lethal invasive pneumonia (8).
To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of exogenous peptide treatment leading to increased opsonophagocytosis of bacteria by human alveolar macrophages. Together with our previous studies, we have now shown that P4 therapy is highly effective in stimulating major phagocytes involved in defending against pneumonia and sepsis in both in vitro human and in vivo murine studies. Augmented passive immunotherapy is a promising new strategy for clinical testing within a broad range of patient groups suffering from respiratory infections.